Thursday, May 10, 2018

In Times to Come, could Muhammad be a Greater Inspiration for White People than Jesus Christ?

Could Muhammad be a greater inspiration for gentiles than Jesus Christ for the challenges faced by white people as they march into an uncertain future? By this, I don’t mean Islam, nor am I suggesting that Muhammad was a greater figure than Jesus. I haven’t read the Koran, and I’m not familiar with the details of the Islamic faith. Like most people, I know the general outlines of who Muhammad was, what he achieved, and how Islam is deeply meaningful to countless people in the world. Also, I only have a basic sense of how Islam is different from Christianity or Judaism and how Islamic history, for better or worse, developed in conflict with Christian history.

So, why do I raise the question as to how Muhammad may serve a great inspiration for White National Liberationists in the struggles to come? It is mainly for one simple reason. Muhammad was a non-Jew who founded a great religion inspired by religions founded by Jews: Judaism and Christianity. THAT is Huge. Even though Christianity passed over to non-Jews, most significantly to Europeans who made it into the most powerful faith on Earth, it was totally founded by Jews. So, all Christians — unless they happen to be Jewish converts to Christ — are really worshiping a religion envisioned, enacted, and enlivened by Jewish spirit and imagination. Therefore, Christians are merely spiritual servants of Jews.

Sure, we can argue that Jesus, the Disciples, and Paul were rejected by the Jewish community. We can argue that the Disciples and especially Paul turned against the Jews and placed their hopes with pagans who might be converted to the New Faith. And we can argue that pagans, having been converted to Christianity, came to both spiritual and material greatness. They also gained power over Jews who, in turn, came to detest Christianity as a faith stolen from them by Arabs and Europeans by the way of Jewish traitor-heretics: Jesus, His Disciples, and especially Paul. Yes, that may all be true. Jews wholly rejected Jesus and the Disciples, and the Christian Faith became a deeply meaningful religion of Europeans and Arabs(before Islam won over most of them later).

However, the history of Christianity seems to suggest that Jews and Only Jews are capable of prophecy and of receiving the divine light. The great prophets of the Old Testament are Jewish. And Jesus was born a Jew, and all His Disciples were Jewish. And Paul was Jewish. Therefore, Christianity, though coming into its own as a great religion among Europeans, totally relied on the vision, imagination, and oratory of Jews. Of course, there were many great European thinkers who analyzed, interpreted, and advanced Christian theology. St. Augustine is perhaps the most important. Later, there were Martin Luther and John Calvin. And many others. But still, they were not prophets or founders. They were intellectual servants of Jesus and other Jews who were wholly responsible for founding the New Faith. With Christianity, one can’t get away from the feeling that non-Jews simply haven’t the reach and the depth to be prophets, to be touched by the divine light, and to be inspired by a sense of spiritual destiny. The fact that all those Europeans became good Christians means that, no matter how intelligently they can interpret texts, no matter how many machines they can build, and no matter how many battles they can win, they are incapable of the profoundest creative will: To prophesy the true purpose, to behold the true light, and to forge the truth faith. As long as Europeans/whites cling to Christianity, they shall be servants of the creative, prophetic, and visionary will of another people, one with prophetic will and visionary power.

So, even as European Christians became the most powerful people on Earth and even scared Jews to death at times, the undeniable fact was that Jews had made the fire. Jesus, the Disciples, and Paul may have found a new way to make the fire brighter and more inflammable from the original formula, but they too were Jews. So, when we look at the entirety of European Christendom, it is a story of a people who could not make a fire of their own and have been living off the fire of another people all these years. To be sure, Europeans tended the fire in wonderful and even genius ways, but it was never the fire. They hadn’t made it. Jesus and other Jews made it from the original fire of the Rabbinical Jews.
Consider Elvis Presley, the King of Rock n Roll. He got so rich and famous, one of the most iconic and legendary entertainers of the 20th century. But all said and done, despite his charisma and real talent, his core act — what made him famous in the first place — was an imitation of black rhythm-n-blues. So, no matter how big and famous Elvis and his imitators got, there is no getting around the fact that they ‘stole’ the fire of black music. They themselves could not come up with that music. They could only co-opt it and make it their own. To be sure, ‘black music’ in America couldn’t have come into existence without blacks having taken so much from white musical idioms and instruments. There was no Jazz, ragtime, and blues in Old Africa. Still, the jiggity energy that animated rhythm-and-blues was essentially African.
Now, one can argue that white people made something even better out of black music — in ingenuity, brilliance, and experimentation, the Rolling Stones far surpassed the bluesmen who inspired them — , just like Europeans made of Christianity new possibilities that never would have occurred to Jews. Consider the Notre Dame Cathedral, the music of Johannes Bach and Handel, and the many tomes & artworks that expanded upon or expressed the profound themes of Christianity. And yet, neither Christianity nor Rock n Roll can be claimed by white people as their own organic child. It’s like a family can adopt a child and raise him to grow smart, sturdy, and even spectacular, but when push comes to shove, one must admit that the child was not born of that family. He was taken from another family. In the Argentinian film THE OFFICIAL STORY, a military officer and his wife do their utmost to raise an adopted child with love and care, but as the wife discovers, the child was taken from her natural parents who'd been executed/murdered by the military junta. Jews have an ambivalent feeling about Christianity. On the one hand, it is the child that they threw out or sought to kill in its cradle; but it somehow lived and passed over to Arabs and Europeans who raised it to grow into a great religion. On the other hand, Jews see Christianity as their own child that was ‘stolen’ by another people. Jews didn’t want the Christian-child but then came to resent the fact that it found a place among another people who raised it to become the most powerful religion on Earth.

But all said and done, there is no getting around the fact that, as long as Europeans/whites cling to Christianity, they must live with the reminder that they, as a people, have been living under the spell of another Tribe and have been incapable of envisioning and founding a religion or grand vision of their own. In science, whites have proven their genius and brilliance. In arts and architecture, whites have surpassed all other peoples. And despite the huge influence black music has had since the 20th century, the greatest and the most sublime music was made by Europeans, especially the Germans. And the bulk of the greatest literature was also written by Europeans/whites. Also, Europeans were the masters of philosophy and developed some of the most amazing mythologies ever. It is very possible that Greek mythology is the summit of human imagination. But in the long run, mythologies cannot hold a candle to a religion. Mythologies, though communal religions in their time, eventually come to be regarded as folklore, metaphor, or imagination. A civilization outgrows them. In contrast, religions and deep faiths are forever. Even the brightest light of reason and science cannot rid the world of faith and religion. It is in the art of creating religions that Western Man has totally failed. It was the Jews who came upon the art of spiritual fire-making. White spirituality has amounted to little more than tending the fire started by Jews. Therefore, as long as white people mainly look to Jesus, the Disciples, and Paul for inspiration, they will be spiritual captives of another people. They will have failed to become prophets themselves.
The story of European Christianity is filled with scholars, saints, priests, scribes, missionaries, and teachers. But there are no prophets because white Christians totally submitted to the vision, imagination, and prophecy of the Jewish heretics who came to form the core circle of the Christian founding.

In contrast, Muhammad did something truly remarkable. The key factor was that Muhammad was not Jewish(or even a Christian). He was a pagan Arab who, instead of striving to be accepted into the Jewish community or converting to Christianity, had the strength of will, both daring and reckless, to create a new religion. Unlike all those Europeans who merely knelt at the feet of Jewish prophets, Muhammad chose to be a prophet on his own terms. He decided to learn about the great faiths of Jews and Christians, seek the divine light, commune with God/Allah, and present the True(and Final) Version of the Way of God. The West failed to produce a man of such will. Perhaps, in this regard, the Semites, Jewish or Arab, just have more sand(no pun intended). They have more gristle in their soul-gizzards to grind it all down and reconstitute something else. If the West swallowed whole the Jewish-founded faith of Christianity that passed through the spiritual digestive system without much alteration, the Semito-Arab Muhammad ground down Judaism and Christianity to the point where they could serve as fertilizers for something new and different. Thus, Islam was born. Even though it could not have existed without Judaism and Christianity, it was more than an interpretation of those established religions.

Europeans dared not challenge the Messianic prophecy of Jesus, the Disciples, and Paul. While they could pray to God and hope to earn His blessing, they didn’t dare to believe that they could be face-to-face with God and be the new prophets or messiahs. For them, the Old Testament and the New Testament were the Core Canon. All they could do was hope to understand it, interpret it, build on it, and live by it. In contrast, Muhammad had the Semito-Chutzpah to entertain the notion that he himself could be the next prophet, indeed the Final Prophet, and lay down the real definitive Message from God/Allah. To put it in vulgar terms, Muhammad had bigger balls than all the European Christians who left behind so many books and arts in service to Faith founded by Jews. (Granted, Muhammad’s claim of being the Final Prophet robbed all future Muslims of the prophetic will, something that is now owned only by Jews because they still await the messiah whether in the spiritual or secular sense.)

Anyway, it now appears that Christianity is finally nearing the end of its life-span. Mainline churches are totally worthless and more about worshiping homos & trannies than God and Jesus. Evangelicals are low-IQ morons whose main theme is "I Luv Israel". Catholic Church is a den of closet-homosexuals, pedophiles, Third World leeches, and flakes like the current pope. Third World Christianity is a hodgepodge of ugabuga superstition in Africa or prayer for higher social status in Asia.

So, what is there? Should white people turn to Islam? Of course not. Islam is simply not compatible with the European soul. What about Mormonism? It is essentially a useless stillborn cult-religion that is neither Christianity nor a new religion. In some ways, the founders of Mormonism were comparable to Muhammad in that they had the daring to claim a New Message from God above. And yet, Mormonism also claimed to be an extension of Christianity, and the Mormon Latter-Day Saints will insist that they are indeed good Christians. Though I haven’t read the Book of Mormon either, what I’ve heard of it suggests it can’t hold a candle to Koran in imagination and depth. I can’t help feeling that Mormonism is now essentially a Cult of appearing moral and respectable in habits and manners WITHOUT any substantive search for deeper truth. There is something a bit too ‘pat’ and ‘sure’ about Mormonism. Notice how Mitt Romney passes himself as a good Mormon because he adheres to all the Mormonic do’s and don’ts. I’m sure he doesn’t drink and has acted like a 1950s conservative dad at home. But look beneath the shell of respectability and Romney is a lowlife slimeball and sleazebag in business and politics. He sort of reminds me of the gentile Studio Boss in HAIL, CAESAR!(a Catholic to be sure) whose idea of repenting for sins as a good Christian is centered around trifle like quitting cigarettes while being utterly oblivious to his complete immersion in the sordid and lurid world of Hollywood.

Anyway, the future is a big question mark. Christianity is essentially a spent force. Mainline Christianity is a homo worship, Catholicism is a closet-homo, Third World, and New Age mess. Orthodox faith and practice are more stable but essentially a museum piece. It is about preservation, not rejuvenation. Evangelicals are too dumb to comment on. Mormons are a bunch of cultists. Ironically, because of their negative association with polygamy and other scandals, the latter-day-Mormons have been so obsessed about coming across as more-normal-than-normal, a strategy also adopted by homos(at least some of them) who are eager to present themselves as the New Normal because so much of homo culture has been associated with debauchery, disease, and death. But, such striving for ersatz normality by Mormons and homos make them fundamentally dishonest and unwilling to face the true nature of what they are. The fact is Mormonism began as a crackpot pseudo-religion founded by a charlatan. Still, its latter-day-success attests to the power of persistence, diligence, and earning potential. With enough members and dollars, the Mormons became impossible to ignore, just like homos later... and that may be why more Mormons are warming up to ‘gay marriage’. Neither Mormonism nor Homomania has anything real at their core. They are false faiths whose respectability owes to outward appearance of ‘normality’ and the power of cash to buy friends in high places.

We are living in dark and strange times but also the most exciting times. It turns out there is no End of History. The Left is now a joke, essentially a worship of Homos and the idea that Bruce Jenner is a ‘woman’. And infantile chanting of slogans such as ‘Diversity is our strength’ or ‘Inclusion, goo’. Jews promote Homomania as the new faith, but how long can such idiocy last? Even mainstream culture is being utterly pornified. For most people, Pop Culture is the only culture, and PC dogma is their entire world-view. Nothing is certain in our times. Even as PC tries to make us worship Diversity, Homomania, Shoah, and Magic Negro as new religions, most people find no great or deep meaning in them. Also, the sheer power of Pop Culture has a way of trivializing everything into frivolity. When Jews tell us, in equal measure, to remind ourselves that Bruce Jenner is a ‘woman’ and that ‘6 million died in the Holocaust’ — or that we owe it to ‘6 million dead Jews’ to support tranny fantasies because refusing to do so may lead to another Holocaust — , we are living in some kind of Clown World. It means there is a great spiritual, moral, and visionary vacuum in post-soul of latter-day-modernity. So many are grasping for meaning and truth but don’t know what it is, where it is. So, the future will likely be a time of new prophets and new covenants. The old formulas no longer speak to us, the current formulas are decadent or demented, and future visions have yet to be discovered.

Anyway, in striving to find the new visions and new truths, white people might look more to Muhammad than to Jesus. While Jesus was a Jewish prophet-Messiah in the long line of Jewish prophets, Muhammad was an Arab(a non-Jew) who DARED to take on the role of the prophet. No white man in history ever dared to look so deep and far, indeed to the extent of INDEPENDENTLY founding a great religion. European Christians, incapable of being prophets themselves, merely accepted and served the prophetic will and reach of the Jews.


  1. The biggest problem with your article is that it perpetuates the lie that the Jews are the Israelites of the Bible when the Anglo Saxon Europeans are. Europeans upto the late 1800’s Knew this. The Jewish Encyclopedia acknowledged that the Jews were not Israelites.
    This former knowledge of their identity is why Christianity flourished compared to today where it is dying and being rejected by white Anglo Saxon people.
    If White Anglo Saxon people rediscovered what their heritage was theBible would make more sense to them. Jesus was sent to the Lost Sheep of the house of Israel, Europeans carry with them the promises of God. Not the “Jewish people”. The evidence is in the heraldry of Europe and the ancient symbols of Israel, which are more than the “star of David” which is not an Israelite tribal symbol anyway. Search the truth, you will find it

  2. The only thing Europeans can "learn" from Mo is bloodlust.


  3. sorry to burst your bubble. There is a decent chance Mohammed's mom was Jewish. His wife certainly was and the tribe that initially gathered around him were Jews or krypto Jews. Here's an interesting read about all of that.
    Sad to say, lets just call all the abrahamic religions Jewish mind controll. We need a better way!
    That site is great. He's the one that tied the printing press as a subversive Jewish weapon for me

  4. by the way, this guy at Christian Solution takes a PDF by a Jew-Abramson and makes it clearer for us laymen. Here is the PDF if you wish to go hard core

  5. "Introductory Comments from The Christian Solution:

    You may not have thought about this or even known it, but both Christianity and Islam claim to have the same origins.

    Both start off with mainly Jewish converts, then later gather in an overwhelming number of converts from other religions.

    Both claim Abraham as their father. Both claim to be monotheistic.

    So, what's the difference?

    One set of Jews thought that Jesus Christ was the true Messiah, come to bring peace on Earth.

    Another set of Jews thought that Mohammad was the true Messiah, come to smite the followers of the false Messiah. "