Wednesday, February 21, 2018
Jared Taylor Cannot Win with Facts and Reason Alone - Vision of Future trumps View of Reality - Richard Spencer’s Vision Needs to Smoke Less Crack
There are two prominent figures in the alternative sphere of the rightist spectrum. There is Jared Taylor and Richard Spencer.
Jared Taylor makes good sense backed with facts and logic on a host of issues, but he lacks the vision thing. After all, Moses didn’t manage to lead all those Hebrews out of Egypt just by noticing facts around him. He inspired his people with the vision of a better tomorrow and the Promised Land. He promised them the laws of God on the conviction that God, the one and only God, was on their side. Without such prophecy, neither the mythical Moses nor the historical Muhammad could have achieved what they did. We may learn a lot from someone who points to things around us and gives a factual analysis of every item. But we aren’t likely to be inspired by him or look to him for The Truth, the one that lends meaning, purpose, and direction to our lives. Rather, it is the man who points to the distant horizon and speaks of the great future that inspires people and make them want to follow him. He is the prophet who is far-sighted, whereas the ‘factualists’ are short-sighted.
We need all the fact-based people we can find as they get things done in the world, but the future is made by those who lead the people to ‘another’ world. This another world could be literal in the sense of discovering or conquering a distant territory. Or it could be a vision of how our own land could be transformed into something far greater.
Now, Jared Taylor does have a passion and objective of sorts. He is passionately committed to his own race, culture, and heritage. And he looks forward to a world where whites will be safe and secure in identity and posterity. But it doesn’t excite or inspire because the Taylor’s vision of a good society is all about the A-B-C’s of stability. If he could have a Father-Knows-Best-like society for his own people, he would be content, and that would be that. Such a society would certainly be nice, but it’s not visionary enough to inspire masses of white people to view it as their Promised Land. To inspire the masses, the vision must be more than something nice or something-that-had-been. It has to be something that has yet to be, something so great, wondrous, and glorious. It needn’t be something as fanciful(and ridiculous) as Wakanda, but the vision has to be powerful enough to turn people into zealots and true believers who are willing to kill and die for this vision.
If Bolsheviks, Italian Fascists, National Socialists, Zionists, and Lazarusites have one thing in common, it is the Vision thing. Benito Mussolini convinced Italians that they could once again become a race of heroes, like the warriors of Roman Times, if they come together as a people under his leadership. Bolsheviks intoxicated both the educated elites and landless peasants with a future vision of the End of History of justice and truth. Zionists excited Jews with the hope not only of nation of their own but the recovery of their lost Holy homeland. And the cult-worshipers of Emma Lazarus romanticized the notion of America as a Proposition Nation, the full greatness of which has yet to be realized with the arrival of dreamers from all over the world. Good or bad, sensible or insane, those -isms offer more than facts and reasons. They offer a vision.
In the end, people are not moved by clarity of the empirical mind but the fever of the imperial spirit. Clarity of facts and logic reduces our emotional heat. So, while Jared Taylor makes a convincing case on matters of race and culture, he leaves us feeling calm, cool, and collected. But history is not made by gentlemen. Gentlemen are good managers and officials. But they are not the ones who supply the heat and the juice to make the people want to do something more than the usual, the normal, the routine, and the mundane. Napoleon didn’t inspire his men with facts and data. He made them believe in him, his abilities as leader and his vision of glory for France and the Revolution. T. E. Lawrence convinced all those divided Arab tribes to follow him and serve him not with dry lectures on history or cold political analysis. And it wasn’t just the promise of loot either. He made them believe in his special powers and the dream of Arab unity and glory that had been out-of-reach under Ottoman Rule.
And he did all this despite not even being a Muslim. He managed to convince Arab Muslims to fight fellow Muslims of the Ottoman Empire because his showbiz quasi-prophet act was so compelling.
In the end, history is made by people who believe in a Taboo. They feel what they believe isn’t merely factual or true but holy and sacred. Indeed, the holy and sacred is favored even over factual evidence. After all, we can factually debunk or intellectually deconstruct much of Jewish religion, myths, legends, and history. We can say that, as there never was a God, the notion of Promised Land or Holy Land is just nonsense. Based on chemistry, the dirt in Palestine/Israel is no different from dirt in any neighboring nation. So, there was no Covenant. It was all an invention. And Moses probably never existed, at least in the version told in the Old Testament. But none of that matters to Zionists, even the most secular ones. They BELIEVE in a covenant with history if not with God. And this myth fills them with a vision of the future that MUST be. It is NOT negotiable. And this vision is so powerful that even the most secular leftist Israeli Jews will pick up assault rifles and kill bushels of Arabs, Muslims, and Persians IF that’s what it takes to preserve Israel as the eternal vision of home for the Jews.
Richard Spencer understands this need for Big Vision, a sense of not only being right but righteous. In the end, an order cannot exist for long without its zealots. Israel may have secular elites who think about ‘higher’ and drier things, but it survives only because it has its core neo-Zealots who are willing to go to any length to defend the nation from enemies from both within and without. Now, if an order is totally overrun by zealots, things can get out of hand, like Iran during it rabid Islamo-revolutionary phase. A healthy society needs more than vision, passion, and conviction. There is value in liberal open-mindedness and inquiry. But if an order is only open-minded and dryly intellectual, it won’t have the ferocity to come together and defend the order against enemies. It’s like a person needs more than passion and fists. He needs a mind and heart. But without the fists ready to fight off the threats, the mind and heart will have no security. Before any idea or value, the person must survive as an organism, and that means it must be ready at all times to move into the mode of ferocity and fists to fend off any enemy that threatens his survival and well-being. And this will to survive isn’t based on an idea but an animal passion. But since animal passion alone will just keep a person on the level of an animal(like so many blacks), the mind and heart have to create a vision for the fury and fists to serve. And this vision is something more than objective accounting of reality. Israelis are not committed to defending their nation because they have an objective assessment of their land in terms of economics, minerals, agriculture, water, and etc. After all, the rules of agriculture and market economics, like laws of gravity, are pretty much universal all around the world. All nations read from the same economics and chemistry books. No people ever wanted to defend their nation based on the mere sciences of economics, sociology, psychology, or archaeology. After all, a rational and scientific understanding of anything is a universal endeavor and belongs to all peoples. Even non-Germans can read about German history or brush up on what archaeology has to say about ancient Germanic folks. Even non-Greeks can learn about Greek philosophy, and even non-Jews can read about the history of the part of the world called Palestine/Israel. Knowledge doesn’t belong to any single people. So, if anyone can learn about the history of Jews or Israel(and can even gain more knowledge about Jewish history & culture than your average Jew does), why is it that Jews believe that Jewishness and Israel belong to them in the way such don’t belong to any other people? Why are Jews willing to fight and die for Jewishness and Israel in ways that mere gentile scholars of Jewish culture and Israel do not? It’s because Jews have something more than objective or scholarly interest and knowledge about Israel. They have a powerful sense of their myth, narrative, tragedy, and future/destiny that binds them together. And Jews feel that even gentiles who strongly identify and sympathize with Jews cannot be part of the Tribe. (Incidentally, the reason why many whites so strongly identify with Jews and Israel even though they’re rebuffed by Jews is because they’ve been denied passion in their own identity or failed to develop something on their own with their own vision of the covenant.)
Furthermore, it’s not enough to say that whites are special and especially accomplished. After all, a people who do great things only attract attention from around the world. All great empires not only tried to conquer the world but absorb the world. So, if whites are said to be so great, then, it leads to the logic of universalism, i.e. whites should spread their greatness all over the world(because, after all, greatness wants to rule and doesn’t want to be contained), and the rest of humanity should be able to partake of this greatness.
If whites are to survive as a unique race and culture, the notion of greatness or superiority(in IQ or talent) isn’t enough. Greatness only attracts the attention of others. Also, greatness wants to be admired by others. What great actor or actress doesn’t want to be loved by as many people as possible? What great corporation doesn’t want to expand its market share all over the world? Indeed, when it comes to their great achievements in science, financial power, entertainment, and media, Jews want to take over the entire world. While greatness seeks to dominate others, it also absorbs them, and as the result, the Other also becomes a part of the Great Power. Also, greatness, in its sheer meritocracy, doesn’t necessarily favor one group over another. In some cases, group differences are so stark that meritocracy does lead to total or near-total domination by one group. On meritocracy alone, women cannot compete with men in sports. If women want to play, they need a sports league of their own. In basketball, meritocracy has led to near-total black domination. But greatness in many fields does not so decisively favor one group over all others. Greatness in chemistry, physics, and computer sciences led to the rise of many white, Jewish, and Asian scientists and engineers. Since greatness favors greatness over mediocrity, white greatness will favor non-white greatness over white mediocrity. So, even if one could make the argument that whites have achieved the greatest things in history, putting greatness, ability, and talent at the center of everything will undermine ethno-nationalism and identity of collective racial inheritance. After all, even if it’s true that whites have been more adept at reason and science than other races, the fact still remains that most whites are not very smart or creative. Meanwhile, there are plenty of non-whites who are very smart and creative, and if given a chance by the Western system, will do head-and-shoulders better than most whites. And then, whites of intelligence and creativity will favor non-whites of intelligence and creativity because the system would put greatness and meritocracy at the center of all things. And this is why all this stuff about IQ doesn’t cut it. It’s interesting and informative but doesn’t support the Vision necessary for the survival of a race, culture, and territory.
This is obvious from the case of Jews. If indeed Jews should primarily care about greatness and meritocracy, then the smartest, most creative, most successful, and most powerful Jews should primarily seek out their counterparts of excellence among the gentiles. Smart Jews shouldn’t care about dumb Jews just like smart whites are told to dump on dumb whites. Smart whites are told to think meritocratically and identify mainly with smart Jews and smart non-whites. If smart and powerful Jews acted just like smart and privileged whites, would Jewish people, Jewish culture, and Jewish nation survive? After all, even though Jews are, on average, smarter than other groups, there are plenty of not-so-smart Jews. And yet, Jewish identity, culture, and nationalism remain strong because smart Jews believe they should primarily identify with other Jews, smart or dumb. So, even though smart Jews will work with smart non-Jews in elite endeavors of physics, chemistry, finance, and computers, when away from work their main identity and loyalty are with Jewishness, Jewish history, Jewish culture, and Jewish nationhood in Israel.
In contrast, look at the decline of Episcopalians despite the fact that they had an IQ equivalent or possibly even higher than of Ashkenazi Jews. So, why did Jewish power keep rising whereas Episcopalian power faded despite their individual successes. As individuals, there are still many successful, rich, and/or super-privileged Episcopalians. But because they abandoned their sense of racial/cultural unity and history/heritage, the sense of their own community was lost. Episcopalianism was both too exclusive and too weak to survive as an identity. Those within the denomination were exclusive enough to set themselves apart from other white Christians, but they lacked an communal sense that was powerful enough to hold the community together like among Jews(or even Mormons). Power isn’t more than a series of individual successes. True power is the unity of those of individualities. It’s like a bunch of individuals can be great warriors, but if each fights only for himself than coming together to form an army, they won’t stand a chance against the power composed of individuals working as a team. If every wolf acted as a lone wolf, it could not bring down a moose, elk, or bear. But if they work as a team, they can bring down the biggest game.
Jews retained a powerful pack instinct, whereas Episcopalians, despite equal intelligence, eventually turned into lone wolves. Since Episcopalians couldn’t form a pack of their own, their lone talents attached themselves to those with pack instinct. Today, most successful white gentiles just serve Jewish interests because Jews still act as a pack to form a dominant team. The only way this team can be countered is by forming counter-teams, but Jews have used their control of academia and media to indoctrinate white gentiles with the idea that pack-mentality is noble among Jews(and blacks) but downright evil and ‘supremacist’ for whites.
Imagine single beams of light. They are all very nice but unless all those beams converge, there cannot be the super-beam that burns as bright as the sun. Indeed, the Sun is powerful because so much matter converged over time within a single gravitational field to create that great furnace in space. It’s like charcoal. If you have 20 lit charcoals and place them apart, you won’t be able to cook anything because there is no combined heat. To cook a steak, you have to pack the coals together for a real flames that can cook a whole pig(though, to be sure, pigs should be spared for their intelligence). It’s like what Albert Speer pulled off at the 1936 Berlin Olympics where all the beams of light converted to create a super-beam, an artificial sun in the sky.
So, it isn’t enough for White National Liberators to focus so much on metrics of intelligence, creativity, originality, personality traits, or whatever. This is especially because ability and superiority tends to be disloyal to the tribe. If a white guy is good in basketball, he will play with blacks in the NBA because he wants to be with the best. A pretty white cheerleader will not side with race. Since she has something of special value(her looks), she will want to be associated with someone else with special value, and if a Negro beats a white guy in sports, she will go with the Negro because of his athletic superiority. A brilliant Chinese scientist may decide to move to the US and work at MIT because American academic institutions are where the best minds are. And even smart Jews are tempted to forgo Jewish interest IF doing so boosts their chances of being with the best people.
Fortunately for Jews, even when Jews go for total meritocracy, they can be assured of being with lots of fellow Jews since Jews have a decisive advantage in IQ. And even when Jews marry non-Jews, it’s usually the case that the latter decides to raise the kids as Jewish since Jewishness has such prestige in the halls of power. The thing is Jews didn’t become so powerful with merit alone. It wasn’t simply because Jews tend to be smarter, and therefore, there are more smart Jews in high places. It’s because all those Jewish beams of light converged to create the Jewish sun of power. Because Jews know this is the secret to their own power, they discourage it among gentiles. Without their strong sense of tribe and unity, Jewish advantage in ability and intelligence could paradoxically be a liability where Jewish power is concerned. Again, despite higher general Jewish IQ, most Jews are not geniuses or even very smart. Your average Jew has an IQ of 110 to 115, which is good but not outstanding by any stretch of the imagination. And there are Jews with IQ considerably lower than that. Israel has a lot of Sephardic Jews, and their IQ isn’t much above that of Arabs. So, if Jews went by meritocracy alone, they could easily become like Episcopalians in no time. The smart and successful Jews will only watch out for their own individual interests and, being deracinated, prefer to identify with fellow successful people regardless of their race, color, or creed. In time, the top talents among Jews will feel closer to smart Anglos, smart Arabs, smart Chinese, smart Russians, smart Latins, and even smart Iranians. The middling Jews and dumb Jews will have no representation, leadership, guidance, and protection from powerful Jews. Eventually, they will lose heart and confidence while the smart Jews just look out for self-interest like Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden. Notice that Jews never speak up for Anglo-identity, Christian power, or European heritage. Indeed, such are seen as bad or tainted. In contrast, Hillary supported Israel even in its savage beat-down of Gazans, and Joe Biden, though a deracinated piece of turd, calls himself a ‘Zionist’. According to the likes of George Hee-Hawley, white people are evil ‘racists’ or ‘white supremacists’ if they want to preserve their own identity and heritage, but it’s perfectly okay for Jews to not only uphold their own identity, culture, and territory BUT compel even non-Jews like Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, Barack Obama, John McCain, Donald Trump, and Nikki Haley to go all out in their support of Zionism, indeed even Zionist imperialism over West Bank.
The fact is whites need to be like Jews. Smart, middle, or dumb, it doesn’t matter. If you’re white, you’re part of the family. It’s like a decent member of the family doesn’t disown his brother or sister because he or she isn’t very smart. A race is an extended family. A true nation must be a place for this extended family where every member, from smartest to dumbest, has a sense of belonging. So, even though a white chemist at work must cooperate with chemists of all colors around the world, away from work he must be a white man whose main loyalty is to his race, culture, and nation. And if Jews complain, tell them to stop having their own pack mentality.
Jared Taylor is a perfect gentleman, but gentlemen don’t make history, esp if they don’t have power. Gentlemen can inherit and manage power, but they lack the power of vision to generate the necessary passion for power. Gentlemen stand for moderation, civility, and order, all of which are fine qualities to have in an order, but the forceful will of power was not generated by those qualities to conquer lands or convert souls. Gentlemen are about compromise and negotiation, which are necessary modes in what we call a ‘free society’, but an order is almost never created by compromise but by a compulsive drive to make a vision or dream come true(as long as it has real-world chance of success). Granted, the visionaries can’t only be insistent. While it’s true that Jews realized the dream of Zionism by being insistent, persistent, and zealous, they also knew when to negotiate. Also, Jews had developed many sources of power in finance, media, and government to exert influence over goyim. If Jews had been like lowly Gypsies and just made demands, they would have gotten nowhere.
And it’s also true that Stalin, Hitler, and Mao often played it passive/aggressive. They could put on a nice face, appear moderate or willing to compromise, and be very diplomatic. But even when they were playing ‘nice’, they still had a fire burning within them for the fullest realization of their vision. They could speak softly, but they always carried their hot poker. They could lower to heat to assure rivals and enemies that they favor warmth all around, but they still tended the hot fire within the furnace of power. Jews were passive/aggressive in their push for Zionism, but the passive side always served the aggressive side. Jews were sometimes willing to seem ‘nice’ to look for vulnerabilities on the other side so that, when the time was right, they could drive the stake right through the heart. It’s like a boxer will sometimes move back, throw light jabs, and pretend to go easy... only to find that perfect moment to land the real blows to send the opponent to the canvas. So, Jews weren’t just sparring with their opponents. Even when they seemed to go ‘easy’, they had KO on their minds. And this is a kind of instinct that is alien to Jared Taylor. Raised with southern gentlemanly qualities and patrician instincts, he lacks the power of balls and the instinct to bite-and-tear-off-the-other-balls. He wants to remain above the fray and keep his hands clean. He wants to be dignified, rational, and moderate, even though his views are considered ‘extreme’ by the current Narrative. In contrast, Jews, even though they can seem civil and gentlemanly like Taylor, do have the chimpanzee-an power of balls and instinct to ball-bust other balls. Chimpanzees got big balls because they want to hump as many chimpanzesses as possible. They are truly Portnoic in their lust for domination and fun.
The once glorious revival of the American South in the American Imagination despite the terrible defeat in the Civil War owed to the Southern control of their own Narrative. The South stuck with the Narrative that white Southerners were the tragic victims of Northern white race-betrayal and aggression. And Southern historians depicted the Reconstruction as rape of the South by carpetbaggers, much like Russians feel that their nation was ravaged by Jewish globalists in the 1990s. Also, Southern Whites depicted blacks as the big threat to white social and moral order. D.W. Griffith’s THE BIRTH OF A NATION had an electric effect on the nation. And GONE WITH THE WIND blew away UNCLE TOM’S CABIN. While Harriet Beecher Stowe won the war, Margaret Mitchell won the peace by ennobling the tragic defeat of the South as a romantic epic. Almost no one reads UNCLE TOM’S CABIN, but GONE WITH THE WIND still has countless fans around the world. Even William Faulkner, though very critical of the South, had great nostalgia for Southern heritage. All of this came crashing down with the Civil Rights Movement and thereafter that not only championed the rights and the counter-narrative of Negroes(which was understandable and justifiable since blacks also had a tragic narrative that had been suppressed by White Southerners) but waged total war on anything that imbued the South with tragedy, nobility, integrity, and beauty. In time, Jews got white Northerners to despise everything about the white south, and Southern elites, having been educated by Jews and Liberals, came to loathe their own heritage. According to the current Narrative, there was NOTHING redeemable about the South. So, if there's any glory to America, it all belongs to the North(mainly because it defeated the South) and Immigrants. But this is, of course, bogus since the North, even more than the South, led the Manifest Destiny that wiped out the Indians. Isn’t ‘genocide’ worse than slavery? Also, didn’t the arrival of all those Immigrants lead to greater westward expansion and more ‘genocide’? Jews may have been escaping from pogroms in Eastern Europe, but they came to a nation created by pogroms against Indians. So, how noble are the Jews? (Furthermore, Jews played a key role in the Southern slave economy.) Now, the American Narrative of Westward Expansion shows that one can have a dual narrative about a nation. One can admire the great white vision of conquering the West and turning what had been a savage wilderness into a great new nation. But one can also acknowledge the tragedy of Indians who got trampled and cast aside by the march of progress. We can honor both the triumph of the cowboys and the tragedy of the Indians. But when it comes to the South, "there is only one side", and this BS from Jews who were heavily involved in communist mass-killing, financial destruction of nations, and Nakba & Wars for Israel in the 20th century and 21st century.
This is why one must KNOW YOUR JEW before doing battle with them. For persistent, insistent, and obsessive Jews, there is no compromise. It’s their way or the highway. Notice how Putin made things very good for Jews despite his move against certain Jewish oligarchs who looted the nation in the 1990s. Many Jews were allowed to remain filthy rich, and the Jewish community in Russia gets extra-protection as anti-Jewish sentiments and actions are severely proscribed. But do Jews show any appreciation? No, the likes of Max Boot the chimpan-Jew wants to get together with other nasty Jews and chew on Putin’s balls all night long.
Jared Taylor is under the delusion that Jews can be negotiated with on grounds of equal partnership. It is a gentlemanly approach, but it is deeply flawed because Jews aren’t interested in equal partnership. They want total domination and control. Jews are pushy and fierce. They want it all. Was the guy in THE HEARTBREAK KID willing to compromise? No, he wanted total ownership of the golden shikse poon. If the father had said, "Okay, you can’t marry and screw my daughter, but she will give one blowjob per month", does anyone think the Jewish guy would have said OK? No way. He wanted the whole nine yards.
There are three reasons why Jews don’t want equal partnership with white goyim. (1) Being smarter, Jews think they have the right to dominate others. (2) Being a minority with far fewer numbers than white gentiles, Jews feel that whites may one day renege on the equal partnership and use their numbers to gain dominance over Jews, as sort of happened in Russia. (3) Jewish appetite for power and control is just insatiable regardless of any other factor. Just like Harvey Weinstein had to grab all those women and just like Anthony Weiner had to keep sending his penis pictures to so many women, Jews can’t help themselves.
So, when people like Taylor offer equal partnership, Jews see no point in negotiating. Also, people like Taylor are now so powerless that they are in no position to negotiate. While all the Zionists who support the violent policies of Israel get to run the media and all the think-tanks, Jared Taylor can’t even keep his Twitter account. And while AIPAC rallies calling on all US politicians to support Israel’s brutal occupation of West Bank are lavishly funded and held at huge stadiums, American Renaissance conferences could barely secure a venue. So, Taylor’s fig leaf to the Jews means NOTHING to the Jews. They see him as a defeated man and are out to silence him totally.
Now, if people like Taylor held the real power in America and if they offered equal partnership to Jews on the premise that Jews must be nice to whites, Jews may take up the offer strategically to bid for time as they keep gaining in power to the point where they can finally dethrone and ‘discredit’ anything associated with whiteness. It’s like Jews in the Old American South arrived at a compromise with the Plantation system, and Jews in Russia pretend to go along with Putin while looking for ways to eventually steer Russia into the pocket of Jewish ownership.
Anyway, Taylor's offer is meaningless because Jews already have the power. Why would they take up on the Taylor Plan when they have nothing to gain from him? What do the likes of Taylor have to offer to Jews who got Wall Street, Ivy Leagues, Hollywood, Las Vegas, Big Media, Deep State, High-Tech, and Biggest Law firms? Now, there is a chance that Jews may have to come to the negotiating table in the future if something really BIG happens. Suppose things get so bad for whites that there are violent upheavals in both the US and EU. Suppose the current ruling elites are toppled from power, and a New White Power emerges to take center stage. In that case, Jews better pray that there might still be some whites who are sympathetic to them.
So, one could argue that Taylor’s Offer to Jews is less about the Now than about the Later when Jews might find themselves in big trouble. Or even if whites do totally lose out to Jews and globalism, Jews may face more dangers from non-whites, especially Muslims in the EU. If indeed the EU becomes heavily Muslim and if these Muslims become ever more violent toward whomever they regard as ‘Zionist’, then Jews better hope that whites will side with them and protect them from violent Muslims and Africans.
Anyway, like it or not, the Jewish elites do have a powerful vision of uniting the whole world under the glob-dome of Political Correctness as virtue-vanity ideology, Pop Culture as the only culture, Homomania as the new religion, US militarism as the sole hammer, and Wall Street finance as the final arbiter of all things. The unholy trinity of Jewish Money, Jungle Boogie, and Justice Junkies. And masses of sheeple addicted to celebrity culture. White females to become meat for Jews & Negroes, and white males to become sappy cucks like CucKen Burns.
Yes, it’s all shallow and crass but nevertheless powerful, enthralling, and mesmerizing because it is so pervasive and relentless in fueling vice, vanity, and (delusion of) virtue as a single combo of ecstasy and rapture, best exemplified by the hysterics of Homomania, the celebrations of which convey the excesses of hedonism, conceits of narcissism, and arrogance of moralism. The vanity of vice is the new virtue.
Of course, it’s all ludicrous, but the power of the electronic media, monopoly of terminology, and fulsome pageantry override the senses that render clear thinking almost impossible for so many people. Because the power of media amplifies images and sounds that have such spellbinding impact on so many people, the effect is sufficient to win over and hold most people... in the way that Christmas lights and celebrations are enough to convince children that Christmas is so wonderful even though they know nothing of the religious foundation of the holiday. It’s like Las Vegas, and its endless cascades of lights. It’s not just the prospect of gambling that draws people there. They feel alive, like a ball inside a pinball machine being bounced around endlessly regardless of rhyme or reason.
To be sure, the very nature of globalist power is its biggest vulnerability. Because it is so false, phony, and degenerate, it can only be kept alive by endless supercharged voltage of fun, frills, and fortune. In Old America prior to the rise of electronic media, many families were isolated and had little, but they found real meaning in the family, community, Church, and patriotism. But all those are gone, so what is there but bogus visions and values? Since bogusness is shallow and stupid, it can only be sold with a lot of glitz and shine. It’s like Bread and Circuses of Ancient Rome. Once the state couldn’t provide them anymore, there was nothing to go on. True value has meaning even when ‘unplugged’. It’s like a genuinely worthy song has value even without all the layered effects of electronica. In contrast, many current hits have very little content without the production values that just add a lot of bells and whistles. It’s like a dish with lots of sauce but hardly any meat. Still, as long as the globalist elites have the juice to keep the mojo flowing, billions of people all around the world will remain captivated by the kumbaya.
Against such power, Taylor’s arguments may be sound and factual but are ultimately ineffective. It’s like facts and data sound boring, insignificant, and irrelevant when uttered between two giant speakers blasting words and music that incite the masses into chants and convulsions.
Rappers yammer nonsensical crap, but why do they have such power over so many people, even those who are well-educated and well-read? It’s because rappers are thunderous and hurl fire and brimstone to the beat. Their way isn’t to argue or discuss a point. They command and demand respect.
The thing is, before humans are creatures of reason, they are emotional and sensual beings, and the reason loses out to the rhythm. Consider the success of the utterly stupid Disney revamping of STAR WARS into yet another franchise. The sheer power of hype makes the myth live.
Whatever his faults, Richard Spencer understands that a vision, however corrupt and tawdry, has to be countered by another vision. This takes boldness and a leap of imagination. Would communism have collapsed in the Soviet Union and neighboring Communist nations if the Capitalist West hadn’t existed? After all, as inefficient and underdeveloped Eastern-European communist nations were, they were still far more advanced than nearly all of the non-white world and the Third World. So, if the US and Western Europe hadn’t existed, many people living under communism would have thought they have the best system in the world... just like the Byzantine Empire, being cut off from developments in Western Europe, thought it had the best of everything in comparison to the nearest neighboring powers. And prior to the challenge posed by the West, the Chinese were confident that they had the best of all worlds. Their own vision of things was enough. It was when the more advanced vision of the West challenged the Chinese vision of civilization that the whole system began to gradually but surely unravel, eventually gaining steam whereupon the nation came to be racked by one revolution after another. Would the people of Romania have stood up to Ceausescu if their only vision of Romania had been the one pushed by the state? Weren’t they inspired by what they heard of the world outside Romania and communism, one of freedom and enterprise and ambition and success? It is the counter-vision that undermines the current-vision.
In understanding this, Spencer is onto something. But if Jared Taylor’s view is too short-sighted and factual, Spencer’s vision is too grandiose and delusional. When the West must struggle to save itself and survive, does it make sense to dream of colonizing Africa once again... or flying off to Mars and stars for interstellar colonies? Maybe such is in the cards centuries from now, but white people today need to fix their vision on matters that are most essential. After all, if the West is lost to the darkies, there won’t be the future of great science and technology. Spencer might argue that whites being a majority is not important, because, after all, Jews are a minority yet have so much power. And Brits ruled all of India with a small imperial caste. But what eventually happened to the Brits in India? They got overwhelmed by sheer numbers and got booted out once nationalism and mass political consciousness got universalized. As for the dominance of Jewish minority elite, it's possible only because Jews have white gentiles to serve them and support them. Could Jews have gained such power if they’d stayed out of white world and set up communities in Africa, Asia, Middle East, and Latin America? Blacks would have just raided and raped them. Asians would have ignored them. Muslims would have severely proscribed their freedom. And Latin Americans would have been too lax and corrupt to provide a system in which Jews could thrive with assurance of Rule of Law and Private Property. It is no accident that Jews gained the most power among white people. So, Jewish power depends on white support. This was the case in South Africa too. Jews grew very rich there because they were protected by the white Anglo-Boer support system. But when blacks took over and the white support system dramatically weakened, Jews found their place in South Africa far less certain, which is why Jews are deeply worried about black and Hindu(who compete with Jewish diamond merchants) condemnation of ‘white monopoly capital’. Given that Jewish supremacy depends so much on the white support system, one would think that Jews wouldn’t be so eager to keep pushing for more invasion-immigration and Diversity that will diminish white power, in which case Jews will have less of a white support system to rely on.
But, the Jewish idea is that Immigration and Diversity should be pushed at least to the extent that white majority power is broken. In other words, Jews want to live in a nation with lots of whites but one in which whites cannot form a majority to block whatever agenda Jews want. Now, shouldn't Jews worry about non-whites working as a new majority against Jewish power? No. Why not? Because non-whites will be too diverse — blacks, Mexicans, Asians, Hindus, Muslims, etc. — to agree on anything and unite into an effective force. Also, even though non-whites will supply the votes(almost entirely for more immigration and more gibs), they will not get to control the agenda since most of them don’t have the means to reach elite positions, and the only ones that do, the Asians, tend to be pretty docile and obedient to the dominant Narrative and Agenda. Non-whites will supply the votes to keep Jewish elites in power, but it will be the Jewish elites who make all the important decisions. And if non-whites get restless, Jews can always use the power of media to direct non-white ire at 'white privilege'.
Anyway, the Vision is the key. Whites must be instilled with a passion so powerful that makes them feel the world is intolerable UNLESS their vision is realized. This vision must essentially be national since white people need to respect the national visions of other peoples as well.
In big things, there must be mutual respect and reciprocity. The notion of one people or nation ruling or controlling the whole world will lead to more disasters. One must have a passionate vision, but one must also have a sense of limits.
Richard Spencer thinks white people have some 'Faustian' destiny to rule, but this is total misreading of history. So much of the world was once easy to conquer because (1) The West was so advanced in arms and technology and (2) the Non-West societies lacked national consciousness. So, when whites conquered a territory and took out its elites, most natives didn't care because their concept of power was something that happened above. They saw themselves as subjects than citizens. So, what did it matter if they were subjects of local power or foreign power? Subjects are meant to obey. So, if foreign imperialists took out local elites, it was the war between the 'gods' that had little to do with most native folks.
That was then, this is now. All the world have gained development in modern technology, and all peoples around the world have national consciousness. India even has nukes. What would happen if the British tried to invade India or China today? Even the lone superpower like the US got badly bogged down in a third-rate power like Iraq.
People need vision, but every vision must have limits. The world is not a STAR WARS movie where people get to play Darth Vader. On the other hand, Taylor's C-3PO-like factualism doesn't quite inspire.
Tuesday, February 20, 2018
Tyler Cowen Is Full of Beans in Claiming ‘Same-Sex Marriage’ Had No Deleterious Impact on Larger Society - In Fact, Homomania Canonized Lies as the New Truth
Tyler Cowen, whose future vision for most Americans is to consume more beans, is full of hot air when it comes to the ‘gay rights’ and its larger impact on society. In an interview with Camille Paglia, Tyler, the Harvey-Weinstein-minus-the-gonads-look-alike-fool, smugly remarked that, you see, the world didn’t come to end and the sky didn’t fall because ‘gay marriage’ became the Law of the Land. So, the LGBTQ revolution was no big deal. There was nothing to be worried about. It was just about homosexuals getting their due ‘gay rights’ and becoming like the rest of us. Society just ‘evolved’ by accepting homosexuals as people just like you and me. And even now, whether its Cowen, Steven Pinker, and Jonathan Haidt, we keep hearing the term ‘gay rights’ when it comes to the issue of this phenomenon called the LGBT(Q) movement. This is fundamentally false for several reasons. The fact is homos got their ‘gay rights’ ages ago. Except for some localities, most of America came to accept homosexuals for what they are and even came to tolerate trannies. Following the social and cultural transformations of the 1960s, most homosexuals had full rights as individuals and could work at just about any job. Also, in some many elite industries, homosexuals were not only well-represented but favored, not least among themselves, just like many industries that came to be dominated by Jews went out of their way to favor Jews over others despite the fact that discrimination against Jews was a thing of the past. The Jewish-dominated media created the impression that homos were still oppressed and persecuted all over America by favoring certain narratives. So, if there was a case where a homosexual got attacked by local thugs, it made the national news. But the media covered up stories of homosexual degeneracy and bad behavior.
The media have the power to mold mass perceptions. Consider the media blackout on the instances of black thugs playing knockout games against whites or non-blacks. Despite the problem, the media turned a blind eye, and many Americans didn’t know about it unless they looked to alternative news sources on the internet. However, when some blacks pulled knockout games on some Jews in NY, it was suddenly newsworthy. The Jew-run media obviously deems Jewish lives more worthy.
Or consider the whole Trayvon Martin affair. There are so many cases of blacks acting aggressive and brutalizing members of other races, but the national media pay almost no attention to this problem. It makes the local news and then sinks into a memory hole.
Colin Flaherty had a Youtube Channel in which he gathered up various local news about bad black behavior and thus made it available to the worldwide audience. But the Jews who run Youtube shut down his channel because it went against the Narrative. Jewish power relies on white submissivism to Jews, and the only way to ensure such servility is to paralyze whites with ‘white guilt’. Since white Americans had nothing to do with the Shoah, the guilt-bait that Jews use on white Americans is about black slavery and ‘Jim Crow’. The Jewish Narratives says blacks were these noble, wonderful, and wise people who were greatly wronged by white people for no reason. So, anything that whites did in the past to secure their well-being against blacks was ‘irrational’, ‘unjustifiable’, and ‘evil’. So, if whites are made to feel that they’d mistreated a people who are so very good and noble, they are bound to feel extra-guilty. Thus burdened with ‘white guilt’, whites feel paralyzed in terms of pride of identity. Their only redemption, then, is to serve other peoples... such as Jews and whatever groups Jews find particularly useful at the moment. And that is why Colin Flaherty was banned from Youtube. His videos and narration drove home the point that there is something innately dangerous about blacks, and therefore, whites in both past and present often had valid reasons for fearing and loathing blacks. 'Racism' wasn't just this irrational fear of skin color but a response to blacks being more violent and tougher because they evolved in Africa. Flaherty's truth was too power for Jews who run youtube.
But when it comes to whites spewing vitriol against Muslims, Jews are far more forgiving because Jews need white warriors against the Arab/Muslim/Persian enemies of Zionism. So, if Colin Flaherty had made anti-Muslim videos highlighting how cruel, barbaric, and murderous Muslims are(especially in Muslim nations as Jews do have use for American Muslims as wonderful immigrant allies against White America), he would still have his Youtube channel as does Pat Condell, most of whose shtick is to attack Muslims as the source of 99% of all the problems in the world. Condell is apparently in good graces with ADL, the Zionist-supremacist organization, that partners up with Facebook, Google, and Twitter to decide who should or shouldn’t be terminated.
Anyway, the media can make a mountain out of a molehill and make a molehill out of a mountain. The media can look at something small with a convex lens to make it loom large OR look at something large through a concave lens and make it shrink small. Via ‘convexing’ or ‘concaving’, the Jewish-run media can play all sorts of tricks to mess with collective perceptions of reality. When it came to the horrors of the AIDS epidemic unleashed by the homosexual community, the Jew-run media downplayed the role of degeneracy among homos. Instead, the usual narrative was that homos were angelic victims struck down by some mysterious ailment when, in fact, virtually all of them contracted the disease by out-of-control ‘bunging’. Rather than give us the hard facts, the media and entertainment gave us stuff like the Tom Hanks movie PHILADELPHIA that would have us believe that a homo guy, who is more normal-than-normal, got the disease almost accidentally and unknowingly. To further drive home the point of angelic homo victim-hood, he partners up with a black guy. And we are to believe in that in a big Liberal city in the 1990s, no law firm will take a legal case of a homosexual. (Few years ago, when the ‘gay marriage’ issue made it to the Supreme Court, the side opposing 'gay marriage' could not get representation from any big law firm. And Richard Spencer, up to his neck in frivolous lawsuits from Charlotesville's Jews and cretins, can’t find a single lawyer to defend him. And Christian bakers who are driven out of business and hit with huge fines for refusing to bake perversion cakes for ‘gay weddings’ have a difficult time getting legal representation. But in the Jew-run universe of media and entertainment, we are to believe that it’s the beleaguered homosexual in a big city who can’t find anyone to represent him against a big corporation and had to settle for some cynical black guy who, in time, learns to revere the homosexual guy as some angelic figure. "Sheeeiiiit, homos be even holier than us niggaz.") But then, the Jew-run media had us believing forever that Israeli Jews are under threat from crazy Palestinians when, in fact, it’s the Palestinians who’ve been oppressed and brutalized by Israelis ever since Jewish Zionists decided to murder the nation of Palestine and build Israel over its grave. The motto, "Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you" is so apt when it comes to so many crises around the world. The Jew-run US is the aggressor against much-diminished Russia, but Americans are told that Putin is ‘new hitler’ and Russia meddled in US elections. (If anything, the US has been meddling in Russian politics since the 1990s when Jews financially raped that whole nation.) Jews use American Power to rip apart Muslim nations like Libya and Syria, but we are to believe that good ole Americans were just acting in defense of 'human rights' to protect innocent people from evil tyrants. And even though Iran hasn’t invaded anybody forever whereas Israel has invaded its neighbors so many times, the power of Jewish money and influence forces every politician and newsperson to carry on as if the Israel and maybe the US are facing an ‘existential’ threat from Iran.
Anyway, when Jews like Cowen, Haidt, and Pinker refer to the homo agenda as ‘gay rights’, they are just playing mind-tricks with us. They must know that ‘gay rights’ was a thing long time ago. What we’ve had since the 1990s was the rise of Homomania, Queertianity, or Gay Rites. Jews having used the power of media and entertainment to turn homosexuality into a holy icon. Jews want Americans to abandon Christianity and traditional symbols & values and surrender to the bacchanalian quasi-spirituality of Homomania. It’s like worship and festivity all rolled into one, like the Mardis Gras in New Orleans turned into a neo-religious event. But then, these very same Jews transformed gambling from a vice to a new kind of ‘virtue’ that even corrects historic wrongs by tossing some shekels at American Indians in reservations. (Now, why didn’t the Germans and Poles think of that? Why not run casinos in former Nazi camps? And run some in Ukraine to in honor of the victims of Stalin. And then, the owners and operators can rake it in big time while tossing some shekels at the ‘survivors’ and their descendants to prove that it’s all for a good cause.) Steven Pinker is deeply anti-religious and takes pride in his thoroughgoing atheism... but he seems to be utterly blind to the fact that Homomania is the new defacto religion of America. Since homos, as yet, don’t have their own temples in honor of the holy bunghole, they’ve decided to take over Christian churches and drape them with homo colors, easily done since most Mainline churches are run by deracinated and decadent lesbians or oddballs and because Baptist churches are mostly run by hucksters looking for easy bucks from Zionist oligarchs by turning their churches into centers of hatred against Palestinians and Iranians. It’s hardly an exaggeration to say that Evangelical Christianity in America is 70% about ‘Muh Israel’ and "Let’s drop some more bombs on those subhuman ‘muzzies’", which is amusing because American Jews despise white Evangelicals more than any other group, yes even more than Muslims. But that’s Amerika in a nutshell. Jews despise and spit on a group that reveres and serves them the most, and Evangelicals weep and pray for the group that reviles and abuses them the most. Is it any wonder why one group has so much more power over the other?
Pinker claims to be atheist, but he’s apparently okay with the neo-religion of Homomania enforcing taboos just as a religion does. But then, where does one start with the lies of the homo agenda? First, the very idea of using ‘gay’ to denote ‘homosexuality’ is a perversion of language. ‘Gay’ meant happy, blissful, giddy, light-hearted, and/or debonair. Even if gay qualities are more pronounced among homos than straight people, there are homos who aren’t gay in style and manners, and there are straight people with gay qualities. And yet, homos claimed the whole term for themselves, and then the adjective was turn into a noun, as in ‘gays’ meaning a bunch of homo guys. Imagine blacks owning ‘fast’ to mean ‘black’ because blacks generally run faster than other races. Imagine Asians owning ‘studious’ because they tend to study harder than other races. But the lunacy didn’t end with ‘gay’. Recently, with full support of Jew-run media and Jew-run advertising — it’s hard to tell which is which anymore — , the ‘gays’ decided to own ‘pride’ too. ‘Gay pride’ sounded ridiculous enough because, after all, where is the pride in homo fecal penetration and men sucking each other’s penises? Worse, with LGBT(Q) combining ‘gays’ and trannies into one single combo-meal identity, ‘pride’ is also supposed to apply to men who put on wigs, wear dresses, pump themselves with artificial hormones, and even have their genitals mutilated to be altered into fake genitals of the opposite sex. As if that wasn’t enough, homos decided that their symbol should be all the colors. Yes, 2% or 3% of LGBT(Q) folks should lay claim to the entire color spectrum. And then, homo-ness should be ass-ociated with things that have no relation to homosexuality. So, we are supposed to buy homo-colored Oreo cookies. Now, why would anyone want to associate cookie-eating with homos buggering one another or with trannies going to doctors to have their genitals mutilated?koshering even foods mostly bought and consumed by non-Jews. (Perhaps, there is something a bit ‘gay’ about oreo cookies, at least when homos eat it. Maybe homos see the white cream between two black cookies as akin to sperm with feces up the bunghole.) Why must most food be koshered when most Americans are not Jewish? Why must so many food products by ‘homoshered’ even though most Americans aren’t homo? Evidently, Jews promoted homos because they want to normalize for all Americans the sense that the great majority must favor and serve the minority elites. Since both Jews and homos constitute minority elites, their powers are complementary. It’s like the Jewish and Homo alliance in the Coen Brothers’ HAIL CAESAR. Jews are wizards of profits and prophecy. Homos are wizards of creativity and visionary prowess. Jewish prophets profit from Homo visionary vanity. Since the masses want to stare up at icons and idols than gaze at humdrum humanity, Jews need their homos who have an exquisite eye for details in creating iconic figures and images. That aspect of creativity is one thing homos can lay special, though hardly unique, claim to because a disproportionately higher percentage of homos have that keen eye and touch than straight people do. It’s hardly surprising that the homo revolution was top-down than the other way around since it was the rich, privileged, and vain who could most afford the services of the whoopity-doopers. Still, most homosexuals aren’t that creative, and even the ones that are tend to favor shallow vapid expression than anything with depth. If anything, homosexual creativity was much more substantive in the past because, having to remain in the closet, homos channeled their creative energies to explore and represent things of deeper or higher value. But once society turned libertine and allowed homos to indulge totally in their own vanity, homo creativity has gone mostly into self-indulgence in fashion and kitschy pageantry. Most of homo expression today is self-parody.
Anyway, to further elevate Homomania into a neo-religion, the Jewish-run media and heavily Jewish-influenced mass education spread the notion of ‘homophobia’. It was a total misuse of the term phobia that really means extremely fearful and panicked reaction to something harmless. A man who freaks out over a small white mouse could be said to have a phobia. But ‘homophobia’ could mean anyone who found homo fecal penetration gross, opposed ‘gay marriage’ as insane and immoral, or cracked a joke about homos. Imagine that. Finding homos to be amusing in a ridiculous way is ‘phobic’. Using this logic, Polack Jokes would be ‘Polophobic’. Jokes about fat people would be ‘fatophobic’. Jokes about short people would ‘shortophobic’.
Now, some may argue that terms like ‘homophobia’ and ‘xenophobia’ aren’t to be taken at face value. They should just mean something like strong animus or opposition to a cause, culture, or movement. But this is disingenuous because designating someone as ‘phobic’ means something far more than anti- or counter-. It implies he is clinically sick in the head, totally irrational, or completely delusional. After all, if ‘phobic’ just means anti- or counter-, why isn’t the open borders crowd not referred to as ‘border-phobic’? Why aren’t feminists called ‘man-phobic’? The term ‘phobic’ is inherently judgmental, so when a people are called ‘homophobic’, it means they are sick, demented, or evil.
But because Jews gained monopoly over the terminology and have control over all media and platforms, they get to invent terms — indeed, ‘homophobia’ was invented by some Jew — and enforce their usage on all of us through schools and news. Considering that men like Steven Pinker, Jonathan Haidt, and Tyler Cowen flatter themselves as free-thinking intellectuals free of PC mental prison, you’d think they would expose the corruption of language in the current political, cultural, and ideological debate, but they just play along with the Jewish-invented terminology. Why? Because despite their liberal, libertarian, or secular credentials, they must feel something deep inside that is powerfully tribal?
Anyway, even a cursory examination of the homo agenda in its unholy alliance with Jewish power makes it obvious that so much of morality, culture, and intellectual discourse had to be compromised and corrupted in order to push the agenda through. There was no way Homomania could go beyond ‘gay rights’ into the ‘promised land’ of Gay Rites unless the American elites were bullied into compliance and the American masses were duped into Summer-of-Homo kumbaya. Secular Liberals generally love to point out how stupidly misinformed the American public is, but they don’t seem bothered by the fact that Americans believe that 25% of Americans are homosexual based on Jewish media saturation of homo characters and themes. Intellectual Jews who love to bemoan the dire state of American education are more than happy to keep most Americans ignorant and misled about issues and matters IF their ignorance is a boon to Jewish power. On occasion, some Jews do lash out at the utterly stupid ignorance of American gentiles who’d for so long been browbeaten into not noticing Jewish Power. It’s getting embarrassing for both Jews and gentiles. I mean, how are Jews supposed to keep insisting that they don’t control Hollywood? And how are gentiles supposed to be respected by Jews when they are dumb enough to fall for the ADL and Ben Shapiro’s line that Hollywood is not run by Zionists but by a bunch of ‘leftists’ who hate Israel. I’ll believe it when Hollywood begins to make a spate of movies about the nobility of Palestinians? Indeed, how about Jews make a BLACK-PANTHER-like movie for Palestinians that imagines the existence of a super-technological Palestine that might have existed IF Jews hadn’t come barging in to steal the land? Joel Stein couldn’t take it any more on the issue of who really controls Hollywood. Enforced ignorance and willful naivete makes either a**holes or idiots out of all of us.
In a way, the West is suffering from the Knowledge Paradox of Jews. In many ways, it’s true that Jews are more educated, more knowledgeable, and better informed than most other groups. They are closer to the news, they read and write more books, they earn more Ph.D’s, and they are more curious about what’s happening around the world. So, naturally, Jews are frustrated with so many gentiles who aren’t well-educated, curious, inquisitive, intellectual, and knowledgeable about world affairs. On one level, Jews do want gentiles to be smarter & more engaged and less ignorant & dumb. They do want to raise the intellectual and information bar higher for gentiles who tend to be less intelligent, intellectual, and informed than Jews. But Jews also love their power and privilege. They also know that not all of Jewish money and influence were gained honestly, morally, or meritocratically. Jews also want to expand their power and wealth even more, and that means they will have to keep bamboozling the goyim.
Now, the climate change controversy may indeed have merit as something we should all worry about, BUT it’s also obvious that Wall Street Jews are hyping it to build another massive tech bubble, this time in green energy. The plan is they’ll put in the money in IPO’s and then watch their stocks grow sky high as sucker gentile money pours in, and then they will pull out their great gains just before the big crash. So, Jews get in first and get out first.
Also, Jews know full well that Diversity will be awful for white gentiles in the US and EU. This is so patently obvious to anyone with eyes. Then, why do Jews want white gentiles to be so ignorant and brainwashed on the issue? It’s because Jews want to secure their supremacist power permanently by destroying white majority power in the West. As rising Diversity will pit gentiles vs gentiles — just consider the likes of Pat Condell bickering endlessly with Muslims — , Jews will get to play divide-and-rule. And even if whites do discover that Jews had pulled a dirty one on them, it will be too late for them to do anything about it. If all of America were like California, then resurgence of white power through elections would be impossible. Jews on top will just play the various gentile groups against one another.
This is why we see the funny phenomenon of Jews berating white people(especially conservatives) for being so ignorant and dumb but then flip out when white people finally do some research and figure out who really has the power. Whatever one thinks of Paul Nehlen, he did some independent research and realized which people have the most power in America and what they are doing with this power against White America. But Jews hate him even more than they hate dumb ignorant ‘white trash’ who voted for Trump and support Israel. So, there’s the paradox of Jews wanting whites to be smarter but freaking out when whites actually use their brains to figure out what’s really going on. Jews have long prided themselves in being independent thinkers who go against the grain of institutional power or official narrative. And Jews act as though they want to inspire the rest of us to be likewise, but when gentiles do follow in the path of the ‘culture of critique’ and learn to see the real power and devise ways to analyze this power, Jews throw a fit and try to shut them down like they shut down the free speech rally in Charlottesville.
Indeed, Jews with god-complex now see us as God saw Adam and Eve. God wanted Adam and Eve to know stuff, but He didn’t want them to eat from the Tree of Knowledge lest they gain the secret of God’s power. So, when they dared to eat the fruits, they were violently exiled and denied the amenities of the Garden. Charlottesville was like the Garden of Eden story. The Alt Right dared to eat the forbidden fruit of the Tree of Power. Having eaten the forbidden fruit, the Alt Right was willing to spill the beans on what the real Power is like in the US. Jews-as-god simply couldn’t allow such knowledge and truth to be known to the people. So, just like God destroyed the Garden and made life difficult for Adam and Eve, the Jewish Power in the US used the police and antifa goons to attack and disperse the Alt Right patriots and White National Liberationists. And just like Adam and Eve found the new reality hostile and forbidding without the old amenities, many on the Alt Right have been fired from jobs, denied service, banned from platforms, and etc.
Jews fear the new language of the Alt Right. They don’t want anyone to hear it, so the Jewish media mendaciously distort the message of White National Emancipators. Just like God destroyed Babel and scattered people all over, Jewish power seeks to smash and destroy the rising tower of white consciousness and unity. Jews also know that people can speak the same language but still not understand one another since they favor different terminologies — pro-life vs pro-choice — and work from different premises. So, two groups could speak the exact same language and comprehend each other but still not understand the other side that seems so ‘evil’. So, there is more to English than English. Because Jews control most of media, academia, and government, to come under the influence of English in the modern world is to come under the sway of Jews. English is now essentially Zionglish. (And what blacks speak in rap is essentially ‘nigglish’.) Jews would have all of us learn and speak Zionglish and think as Jews want us to. We don’t have to learn a special language apart from English to use Zionglish. Knowing English is sufficient for us to fall under the spell of Zionglish, the power of which draws from the (1) narrative premise (2) terminology in how certain terms are defined and in how new terms are created (3) the icons of images and sounds that are associated with certain terms or narratives.
For example, by rules of Zionglish, the narrative premise of the Modern West is ‘white guilt’ derived from the history of white evils of ‘racism’, ‘antisemitism’, and whatnot. A term like ‘gay’ is defined to mean homosexual, thereby impressing upon us the notion that homosexuality is defined more by style than the gross fact of homo fecal penetration. And a term like ‘racism’ is defined as ‘supremacist hatred for other races, especially black’, when in fact, ‘ism’ should just mean belief in something. Also, via the power of electronic media, Jews associate certain ideas, attitudes, and stories with certain images, sounds, and sensations. So, white power is associated with KKK and Holocaust. Black history is seen totally in terms of saintly black victimhood, like the incident at Selma. And even though most black slaves were not beaten 24/7, the iconic image of the slave experience is some black man with badly scarred back. And the narrative of Jim Crow Era is linked with images of lynched blacks even though, in a span of a century, not all that many blacks were lynched. So, that’s how Zionglish works. All you need to know is English but just learn to read, listen, think, and speak as the Jewish media and academia want you to do.
In contrast, Alt Right rejects Zionglish and puts forth a new way to use English. It rejects the terms pushed on white folks by Jews. Alt Right rejects the the simple-minded narratives that, though not entirely false, are rigged to protect and favor Jewish power and privilege. And Alt Right white national autonomists have their own storage of images, sounds, and memes that they want to share to counter the Mono-Narrative pushed by Zionglish.
After all, when Jews talk about Diversity, they don’t mean they care about diversity of views. They just mean diverse races and peoples should all submit to the power of Zionglish that pervades all the global media, academia, and politics. This is why Jews fear true intellectualism, independence of mind, and critical spirit among gentiles. There’s too high a chance that gentiles who learn to see, think, and speak on their own will NOT think like Jews. Sigmund Freud tried to use Carl Jung as a student and follower, but Jung had his own will and agency. He didn’t feel like cowering to anyone. So, we are stuck in a strange world where Jewish elites encourage us to learn more and think more but also tell us what to see, what to think, and what to say. Jews want to make us believe that we, of our own volition, have arrived at the same conclusions as the Jews, but if we were truly free to see, think, and speak, then the chances are we will arrive at different conclusions, all the more so since Jews don’t really believe what they say.
Indeed, there are two Jewish conclusions: the official and the esoteric. So, to the rest of us dummies, Jews will tell us such-and-such as the official conclusion. But among themselves, they have their own modes and codes to, wink wink, send signals that are not supposed to be picked up by us. So, when Jews say, ‘diversity is our strength’, it has two conclusions. The official one would have all of us believe that diversity will indeed enrich and empower each and everyone of us. In contrast, the esoteric conclusion among Jews is, wink wink, "It’s good for the Jews because a gentile house divided unto itself cannot challenge our power."
Diversity babelizes. It not only sets whites against non-whites but sets whites against whites as some whites will remain skeptical of the cult of diversity while others will drink the whole kool aid. Diversity also sets non-whites against their own kind. Muslims who choose to assimilate to trashy Western Pop culture will feel alienated from Muslims who choose to remain true to the faith.
In the globalist order, if all the many diverse peoples are to have one thing in common, it is Zionglish, the usage of which instills in every goyim that the holy three of life are Jews, Homos, and Negroes. Holocaustianity, Homomania, and Rap.
Anyway, just how did the LGBT(Q) movement prove to be especially damaging to the modern world? Why is Cowen so wrong in claiming that the world just went on as usual, and everything is back to normal... except for the fact that homos can ‘marry’?
What LGBTQ-ism did to American society, in which PC had already made it dangerous to speak the truth, was to institutionalize the telling of lies on a grand scale. If, prior to LGBTQ-ism, the thing was to keep your mouth shut and not utter obvious truths(such as relation between blacks and crime) that might offend certain sensibilities, the new norm with LGBTQ-ism was to boldly and brazenly expound the lie not only as the 'truth' but the holy sacrament to which we must all bow down.
Lies aren’t good but a part of everyday life. We all tell lies, little ones and big ones. Sometimes, people tell white lies to be diplomatic. Sometimes, people tell lies to save their own necks for reasons that may be justifiable or not. But we still know, deep down inside, that lies are lies. No one should be proud of telling lies. And we have rule-based means by which to distinguish truth from lies. So, when Jayson Blair of the New York Times was exposed as having written a bunch of false stories, he was reprimanded and fired despite the Times being a ‘liberal’ paper that supposedly feels sympathy for blacks. After all, the world would be scary indeed IF we were told that reality is whatever anyone claims it to be. So, if journalists make up stuff and call it trans-reality and if all of us are compelled to accept such lies as truth, what are to make of real reality and false reality? This was the problem of communist nations where the people were supposed to believe the official narrative no matter how ludicrous it was and had no relation to the reality that the people could see all around. Lies are lies, and they will always be around us like flies. We have to tolerate them, but we must never mistake them for truth.
This is why the institutional protection and promotion of lies as the ‘truth’ is so dangerous, indeed downright cancerous. It means society no longer has the integrity, courage, and resolve to expose and expunge lies and falsehood to defend and uphold the truth. It means there is now a Power that can arbitrarily decide what is ‘true’ and what is ‘false’; and the debate is OVER-AND-DONE-WITH and you better just shut up, follow along, and sound off when called upon.
Nothing, not even the much corrupted black politics, promoted and spread lies as spectacularly as LGBTQ-ism did. According to its loopy logic and fanciful narrative, homos were merely blameless saintly victims of HIV epidemic. We straight people should blame ourselves for not having sufficiently cared for the homos who were buggering one another in bathhouses. (If memory serves us right, whenever homos were given warning and advice on the riskiness of their behavior, their main attitude was mocking laughter or the middle finger. But then, how can we judge a holy people for anything? Even when they do wrong, they are holy, and that means they’re blessed, and since they’re blessed, the blame must fall on us, not them, for not having done more for such a blessed people. But now, some of you will say, "But we did warn them, but they did it anyway and brought it upon themselves." Ahhh, but such attitude is mistaken because it assumes that homos should act according to our sense of reality and responsibility. Since homos are holy and blessed, they should be able to do whatever they please in their own ‘reality’ and revelry. So, if whatever they love doing to each other leads to problems, then it is incumbent upon us, not them, to find the cures and solutions so that they can do as they please and not suffer the consequences. It is the ‘right’ of a holy people to do as they please and not suffer the consequences. To fully such a ‘right’ for a holy people, it is up to us to toil and sweat to come up with The Solution. So, if homos want to bugger one another all over and all the time, it won’t do for us to admonish them and warn how such behavior can do great harm. They must be free to indulge in such behavior because they are holy and, as such, anything they do is blessed. What we must do is try to come up with a cure for all diseases related to homo behavior. That way, homos can bugger a 100 bungs a night and not catch some dreaded disease. That is true progress.) By the logic of LGBT-ism, we are to believe that homo man’s anus, the fecal organ, is a sex organ. We are supposed to say, yep, a bunghole really is, just like a vagina. And ‘two daddies’ or ‘two mommies’ are just as biologically and morally feasible as two real parents of mom and dad.
After all, some homos are rich while many straights are poor, and that means money and privilege are the final arbiters of worth and meaning.
So, the biological and social facts of homosexuality are just as legit for matrimony as the bio-moral basis between man and woman. And if you disagree, you are suffering from a ‘phobia’, or ‘homophobia’. Furthermore, if you entertain funny thoughts about homos or trannies in your head, you must also be irrationally fearful of homosexuality. Yes, homosexuality is so wonderful that entire city blocks must be shut down for massive parades with ‘rainbow’ colors. Most of history must be disregarded as oppressive, backward, and less ‘evolved’ because civilizations around the world never thought to associate homo fecal penetration with rainbow colors and find the highest meaning in hysterical celebration of marching fruitkins and tootkins. Why stop there? Golly gee, homos are so angelic and saintly that every church should be pressed upon to get with the program and festoon its exteriors and interiors with homo colors. And since trannies are allied with homos, they must be holy too. If Jews are holy, then homos are holy because they’re Jews’ best friends, and if homos are holy and if homos say trannies are included in LGBT-ism, then, trannies must be holy too. The logic of Holy-by-Association. Therefore, we better believe a man is a ‘woman’ if he puts on a wig and dress. And of course, his penis and balls can become a ‘vagina’ through surgery. Or, if he decides to keep his penis and balls, he is a ‘woman’ with penis and balls(meaning that penis and balls are no longer distinctly male, and vagina is no longer distinctly female), and you better make sure to believe it because if you don’t, you are ‘transphobic’, and that means you’re a bad bad person. Just have faith in the ‘science’ of LGBT-ism, and believe that a man can have a vagina, and a woman can have a penis. And if you make sure to address him as a ‘her’ or her as a ‘him’, you should be fined for big bucks, and if you don’t pay up, you should be thrown in prison. If you don’t accept the New Truth, you should end up like that baker who refused to bake a homo wedding cake and was prosecuted, dispossessed, and destroyed.
Now, the examples above are all brazen and insane lies, but the Power protected and promoted them. The Power enforced them through all the media and academia they control. Liberal politicians, out of degeneracy or opportunism, enthusiastically got on board, and Conservative politician hung their heads in muted shame in servility to the Power. They knew they lacked the balls to stand up for truth and morality. After all, the Power is with Jews, and if Jews say homos and trannies are their best friends, it is as good as holy writ, indeed as irrevocable as AIPAC demand that the US always favor Zionists over Palestinians(despite the fact that Jews never tire of decrying Old ‘white supremacist’ America for having favored certain groups over others).
Well, what happens to society and culture when that level of mendacity is not only permitted, not only promoted, but even enforced and sanctified by attacking and destroying any voice or agenda that won’t play ball? The end result was the spread of Lying as the New Truth.
BLM was the black counterpart to LGBTQ. Blacks got envious of homos getting all the love and attention with their spectacular lies and hype, so why shouldn’t blacks do likewise and scream ‘black lives matter’ even though the biggest threat to black lives in America is guns and knives in the hands of other blacks. Notwithstanding the problems of police brutality and corruption, black lives are saved by increased police presence. But who cares about the truth when fantasy feels so much better? And if homos have the 'right' to alter reality to whatever they wish, why shouldn't blacks do likewise. When blacks sided with OJ Simpson, much of white America still had the fortitude to shake its head and cry foul. But with BLM in the Age of Obama, we were all supposed to believe in its utterly crazy premise of white cops going around randomly killing innocent blacks. Just like straight society no longer said NO to homo vanities, white society succumbed to Obama-ism and couldn't say NO to BLM lies, what with the mendacious Jew-run media pushing it 24/7.
We always had lies, but the lies today are truly mind-boggling. During the Cold War, it’s true that US exaggerated and lied about Soviet strengths. Still, it was true enough that the USSR was a superpower and a rival to the US. It had also been inhuman and committed mass terror and carried out mass-killings. And even after Stalinism, it remained repressive and left people no choice but to submit to Big Brother.
But is Russia today a ‘new nazi nation’? Is Vladmit Putin really a ‘new hitler’? Where do the media get this stuff? It’s totally fantastic. For over a year, we’ve been bombarded with nonsense reports about how Russia hacked the election. And this from a nation that gloats about how it successfully screwed over so many nations with CIA dirty tricks and secret meddling through NGO’s. And this from Liberals whose great pride during the Cold War was having stood up to ‘paranoid’ and ‘hysterical’ red-baiting elements of the American Right and the military-industrial complex. Was there never any principle involved, or have the new Liberals, in their total collusion with the Deep State and Military-Industrial Complex, completely lost their bearings with too much power, privilege, and connections?
And just how did War on Terror turn into War with Terror against Assad and Gaddafi? How did the US, which got involved in the Middle East after 9/11 in the name of taking out terrorists, forge an alliance with remnant Alqaeda elements(labeled as ‘moderate rebels’) in the destabilization of secular and modern Arab state? How could so many people in media and academia remain so utterly silent about this? Was it because Obama was supposed to be The One, and therefore his presidency was not to be derailed by the revelation that his foreign policy turned out to be even worse than that of George W. Bush? But then, wasn’t Obama himself just one big lie than The One? A huckster pimp elevated to some Hollywood vision of Jesus, Lincoln, Kennedy, MLK, Sidney Poitier, and even Reagan all rolled into a nothing-burrito? Yes, even Reagan. When there is just one total power in the media(that of Jewish globalists), the truth is infinitely malleable according to its whims.
And if blacks and cucks fantasize about this Wakanda in BLACK PANTHER, we should get all excited and pretend it’s better than real. It is Black Eden and Valhalla that WE must build for them because such a ‘cool’ and ‘badass’ people deserve something so awesome. Favor the fantasy. And never mind that yuppie Progs have been using immigration, gentrification, and incarceration to save cities from black crime. Just believe in Wakandanics as a legit vision on how Earth can become a Black Planet.
LGBTQ-ism was one of the worst cancers to befall mankind. Cowen’s smug view wasn’t worth beans… but then he’s the guy who wants us to subsist on beans.
In a nutshell, Lies + Righteousness = Cultural Cancer. Ordinary lies just come and go. Big lies exposed as such are shamed and destroyed. But when big lies are consecrated as the New Truth, it not only kills one truth with an ugly lie but sets the template for endless multiplication of lies. Once a civilization is about favoring the big lie over the essential truth, it sends a message throughout the system that a lie has precedence over the truth. The Power feels it can peddle any lie as the truth since it not only got away with a big lie but convinced the masses of its holiness.
And in a democratic nation like the US, such template emboldens everyone to feel that he or she also has a ‘right’ to demand that his or her fantasy be favored over the inconvenient fact. So, if Lena Dunham is convinced that she is sexy and attractive, we are supposed to play along.
Lies are just lies but when lies are armed with righteousness, it emboldens other liars, fantasists, and nutjobs to follow suit and make similar demands.
Now, Tyler Cowen is right that ‘gay marriage’ didn’t lead to explosions, fires, earthquakes, volcanoes, and comets falling from the sky. But not every catastrophe is so dramatic. It’s like smoking. Almost no one dies of cancer or heart disease right away because he or she begins to smoke. But the risk of cancer is much higher... just like fecal penetration greatly increases the chance of anal cancer. Not every deadly thing is sudden or violent. Rather, the effect can be insidious. This is the nature of cancer. Cancer doesn’t begin with a bang. It begins with the most silent of whimpers. It involves just a few cells. If it begins so small and so quietly, why is it so deadly? Because it introduces a new ‘code’ into the system. Prior to the development of cancer, the body followed a code that regarded cancerous cells as dangerous. So, those cells were corrected, contained, or destroyed. But what happens when cancer begins to go out of control? At that point, the body has lost the means to say NO to the spread of this new programming. Even the healthiest bodies have some cancer cells, but they remain alert and identify the cancer cells as problems to be dealt with. It’s like even good societies have lies and corruption, but the system works hard minimize such bad things. But when the body loses the means to say NO to cancer cells, it is as if the cancer has been ‘consecrated’(or cancercrated) in the body. They now feel emboldened to keep growing and spreading, and in time, they take over the entire body.
LGBT-ism was cancerous, but it still could have been held in check if enough Americans and if the institutions upheld the eternal truths of biology and morality. As long as the main coding of the system only tolerated LGBT-ism while maintaining the core truths of biology and core values of morality, the LGBT-cancer cells could have been contained. But when the very core institutions of media, academia, government, and then even the church accepted the total lies of LGBT anti-essentialist biology and the degenerate immorality that would have us pretend that two men or two women could have kids together, it led to the big cancer of ‘gay marriage’.
Marriage has been the most essential, most crucial, most meaningful, and most fundamental core institution of human civilization. It is the mother of all covenants. It fuses true biology with true morality, the idea that man and woman should commit to one another to take care of children they create together. This was no game, no lifestyle choice, no fashion. It was the core truth from which life sprung and found meaning. In a tolerant society, homos can be homos and can live together and pretend to be ‘mates’, but homo stuff can never be marriage, just like imitation crab meat cannot be real crab meat, just like a plastic tomato can never be real tomato, and just like fool’s gold cannot be real gold(even if one invokes ‘metal equality’). ‘Gay marriage’ was pushed on the notion of ‘marriage equality’, as if invoking ‘equality’ justifies anything. In fact, it is demented to pretend that things of such unequal value have equal value. According to LGBT-ism, we must pretend that a man’s anus has equal value as a woman’s vagina in the name of ‘sexual organ’ equality. This mindset has led to trannies insisting that a penis and balls can be female sex organs if they so choose to believe. What ‘gay marriage’ set off was a hell. The ideas behind ‘gay marriage’ undermine core truths and principles and forces us to not only accept the lie but treat it as holy writ. Being forced to live with lies is one thing. But when lies are consecrated, they turn cancerous. When incest-freaks call for ‘same family marriage’ and if polygamists call for multi-marriage in the name of ‘marriage equality’, what will the likes of Cowen say?
But the cancer of LGBT-ism goes much further than issues of sex and morality. It created a culture where a lie isn’t only to be tolerated but esteemed, revered, and even worshiped. Hang the LGBT flag in churches and make believe that Jesus died to honor men who indulge in fecal penetration and men who go around pretending that their penises and balls are really female sex organs. When that kind of lies is instilled in the hearts and minds of children all over America, the message is loud and clear. There is no set truth, there is no set morality, there is no real biology. The New Truth is about pushing one’s fantasy as fact with the hope and dream that it will come true. And how do you make it 'come true'? By gaining power like Jews and homos who, with their vast media and deep state power, now feel emboldened to make up any bunch of lies and spread them shamelessly. The reason why this Russia Hacking nonsense has gone on for as long as it did is because we no longer have a culture based on any sense of truth. Instead, truth is just a game played by those with power.
Since Jews and homos have the most power and since both groups have a tendency toward neurosis, we are living in a real clusterfuc* world. Just how did Jennifer Rubin Erderly concoct that bullshi* story in Rolling Stone magazine about the gang-nazi-rape that never happened at UVA and fool so many people? It was not only because PC silenced so many voices but because LGBT-ism encouraged us to tell brazen lies and indulge in loony fantasies about 50 genders and pretend they’re all real. But don’t just pretend but press on all of society to comply to the demands of one’s ego and vanity.
Monday, February 19, 2018
American Domestic Policy Will Come to Resemble Foreign Policy as the Nation Becomes More Diverse under Globalism
|A Globo-Nihilist World of Universal Gangsterism|
It should be plainly obvious to anyone with even basic knowledge of world affairs that foreign policy tends to be far more cynical, craven, and criminal than domestic policy. This is almost universally the case. Granted, some tyrant who treats his own people like dirt will likely be more responsible in foreign policy simply because he can’t push other nations around like he can trample on his own people. Mugabe, while he was strongman of Zimbabwe, had very little regard for his own people who acted like dirt and were treated like dirt. Though Mugabe reeked of contempt for other nations as well, especially white ones, he couldn’t push them around like he could his own people. And of course, tyrants like Josef Stalin and Mao Zedong were more mindful when dealing with great powers than in dealing with their own people who were regarded as little more than sheep or cattle. But those are extreme cases of tyrants with immense power and totalitarian means to carry out any amount of atrocities and bloodbaths.
In most cases, the leaders and elites must be mindful or mindful enough of the people they rule, and this applies even to autocratic nations where the ruling class is not all-powerful and could be in serious trouble if they lose the support of the masses. This has especially been true since the near-universalization of the Enlightenment democratic principle that the leaders exist to serve the people than the people exist to serve the leaders. So, even autocrats must do more than merely give lip-service to this ideal. Otherwise, it could lead to the erosion of popular support or, lacking such enthusiasm, of the people’s willingness to submit. After all, even people who submit out of fear may continue to do so if they believe that the rulers are doing a good enough job.
So, in most nations around the world, the Rule is that the leaders must be especially mindful of the people they govern. Unless they can persuade the people that they care and are doing the best for the nation, they could lose the modern equivalent of the ‘divine right’ or ‘mandate from heaven’. In the modern world, the mandate comes from the people. And since all leaders are elected only by the people of the nation, they must be bound to their own nation. And even if they are autocrats, their justification for power is National Interest. So, the Cuban government, though non-democratic, claim to be watching out for the interest of the Cuban people. The government of the CCP in China claim to represent the Will of the Chinese People. Turkey’s Erdogan’s increasing autocratic grip is predicated on the notion that his regime needs extrajudicial powers in the present situation because foreign enemies and agents(possibly even the American ally) are out to undermine Turkish sovereignty. And for this reason, domestic politics can’t be as cynical, cutthroat, opportunistic, nihilistic, and gangsterish as foreign policy. On the outside, foreign relations may seem more civil and considerate. After all, it’s called diplomacy, and national leaders are expected to act statesmanlike on the world stage. So, even leaders of nations with cultures as different as the US and Saudi Arabia are cordial and well-mannered in their discussions and negotiations. In contrast, there is much bickering between the ‘left’ and ‘right’ in UK parliament and US Congress.
But in foreign relations, the veneer of mutual respect is just that: A veneer. Indeed, mutual good manners are necessary precisely because so many nations agree on so little in terms of historical narrative, culture, religion, social values, and national interest. So, it’s all a case of smiling while holding a knife behind their backs. It’s like the show of ‘respect’ in THE GODFATHER films. It’s just a way of doing business because there is nothing but ‘business’ among different nations. Josef Stalin surely found out the hard way when Adolf Hitler, who’d approached him with seeming respect, suddenly launched a surprise attack on the USSR. Hitler acted like Michael Corleone in the final act of THE GODFATHER. (Michael put the other big families at ease and then sprung an attack when they least expected it.) And Muammar Gaddafi also found out the hard way when the very Western leaders who’d been all smiles, handshakes, and pats on the back turned on him and crushed his regime. And when he was brutally lynched to death, there was Hillary Clinton cackling like the Wicked Witch of the West in THE WIZARD OF OZ.
So, foreign policy is never ever to be trusted. It is gangster politics of ever-shifting alliances predicated on the most nakedly brazen of political interests(mostly of the elites because most people of any nation have no stake in world affairs or world power). Consider how the US was all smiles and handshakes with Saddam Hussein when he was fighting Iran. Even when Hussein used poison gas and launched missiles on civilian targets in Iran, the US sent him arms while pretending to be neutral. Worse, the US, via Israel and other proxies, even sent arms to Iran to prolong the war between Iran and Iraq as long as possible. Foreign policy can be THIS cynical, nasty, and brutal. Later, after the Gulf War, the US decided to force sanctions in Iraq that led to the deaths of 100,000s of women and children by some accounts. Again, this sort of thing is easier done to another nation than to one’s own people. Indeed, it’s telling that George W. Bush got more flak for the supposed botch-up of the Hurricane Katrina disaster relief than for what he did to Iraq(including the grisly Abu Gharid episode) and neighboring nations. In the case of New Orleans, the main culprit was the weather and broken levees, but Bush was held accountable for something he had little control of. The disaster killed around 1,800 people, but it was a much bigger issue for Americans than Bush’s wars that killed 100,000s not only by US guns and bombs but by unleashing a civil war that Bush’s clownish regime hadn’t foreseen or prepared for.
So, what does that tell you? Because the US government and American elites aren’t accountable to the world, they can act with utmost impunity, mendacity, opportunism, cruelty, sadism, and total disregard. After all, people in nations destroyed by the US aren’t going to vote in US elections. They aren’t going to donate to US politicians. And as they don’t control the US media, their side of the story isn’t going to be told to the American public, most of whom, by the way, are indifferent to what’s happening around the world(despite their nation being a superpower that can make or break any nation) because they are mainly immersed in hedonism and narcissism. (Granted, most people are like that all over the world, and in that sense, Americans are no worse. However, Americans have greater responsibility to be knowledgeable because they elect leaders whose power can profoundly affect the lives of millions, even billions, of people around the world. If a people live in an inconsequential nation like Iceland or Finland, it doesn’t matter because their governments are NOT going to threaten, destroy, or invade other nations. But when the peoples of Germany and Japan failed in the 1930s to stop their governments from acting recklessly in foreign affairs, the result was catastrophe for the world and their own nations. And for this reason, Americans don’t have a choice. Given the power of the US to destroy the world, all Americans must feel compelled to know about what is happening around the world. It’s because so many Americans are ‘insouciant’[as Paul Craig Roberts calls them] that the Bush regime was able to hoodwink Americans to just go along with a war based on total lies. And it was also why most Obama voters hadn’t a clue as to what was really happening in Libya, Ukraine, Syria, & Yemen and with Russia.) If the US were a better nation, then the media, as the fourth estate, would do its role in informing Americans about what is really happening around the world, what kind of people have the most power and what kinds of agendas they are pushing, and what the tragic toll of all this amounts to, but the media are owned by the People of Power; so, why would the Power expose its dark truths to the People?
During the Cold War, there was more of a balance of power among the elites as there was no single consensus ‘truth’. Many on the Left genuinely believed in socialism, even communism. As such, they entered journalism to expose what they regarded as the rot and disease of capitalism and greed. And many Jews, fast rising in power and privilege, felt it was their calling as both tribesmen and idealists to speak truth to Wasp elite power. Jews regarded their opposition as both ‘good for the Jews’ and ‘good for All Americans’ since it is always good to knock the top dog down a few pegs.
Back in the 1960s, despite the eroding prestige of traditional institutions, they still exerted a large and heavy, even if increasingly ‘silent’, influence. The Catholic Church couldn’t be ignored. And as long as there were many people who’d grown up prior to the 60s, their formative experiences had made them culturally and morally more conservative, not least because the Great Depression and WWII had had a very sobering impact on many Americans of all races and classes. Also, the American South still clung to its own narrative, and this was represented in both the Democratic and Republican Parties. For a long time, the Democratic Party relied on Dixiecrat votes. And the Republicans, to make further gains, especially as immigrant-heavy and black-heavy big cities were so solidly Democratic, also reached out to the South. Even though the Civil Rights Movement was gaining the moral upperhand, the South had its own counter-narrative that went heard in many political circles.
And the mounting tensions from the Vietnam War led to the rise of anti-war voices and patriotic voices. So, there was no single narrative, no single truth, no absolute consensus. Back in the 1960s, the Liberals had genuine radical leftists on their side, and someone like Bill Buckley on the Right could even voice Segregationist sentiments. Some really thought the Soviet Union was a pretty good nation and represented the hope of mankind, at least in supporting Third World anti-imperialist causes that would have been lost without Soviet backing. And some others really thought that the Soviet Union posed the greatest menace to world and thought a far more muscular foreign policy was necessary to roll back communism and hopefully defeat it. And when the feminist movement exploded on the scene, there was a wide range of opinions pro- and con-. But over the years, most of the voices and values grew silent and faded away, leaving only one voice to speak for all in the name of End of History. Catholic power faded, what with even Catholic Americans caring more about Rock, drugs, and sex. Church teachings sounded lame and boring to them. Also, the Church was rocked by pedophile sex scandals, especially damaging because the Jewish media and law firms piled on to bleed the Church dry. As for the Mainline denominations, they became increasingly secular and decadent, and most people lost interest. Today, Mainline churches mostly stand empty and are run mostly be lesbians who apparently have nothing better to do than playact as ‘christians’.
Jewish faith has eroded too, but Jewish power grew stronger because Jewishness doesn’t need religious faith to carry on. It is essentially a blood identity, an ethnicity. So, even Jews who lost faith remained as proud Jews and worked with religious Jews to expand Jewish power. As for older people and their attitudes & values, they all faded as they grew old and died. Indeed, how many members of the Greatest Generation are still alive? Their values died with them because they never formed institutions or created new traditions to keep their morals and values alive. As time passed, Jews gained even more control of the media, and they pushed only one Narrative that favored Jews, blacks, and feminists, thereby putting their opponents on the moral defensive.
The opponents of Jews, blacks, and feminists suffered from two deficits. They weren’t as adept, clever, and crafty as Jews in formulating their counterattack. Also, even if they could, they didn’t have the material and financial means to do so because Jews and Liberals controlled most of the media. Furthermore, pushy Jews, via the TV shows ROOTS and THE HOLOCAUST, made blacks and Jews the holy peoples of the world, making it nearly impossible to be critical of them without being called names. Also, Jews employed the dirty trick of guilt-by-association. Though Jews denounced such tactics when used by Joseph McCarthy, they gleefully denounced peoples, institutions, and industries by exposing their ties to ‘unsavory’ groups. Jews used ADL, SPLC, and NAACP(though black, it was largely funded by Jews) to do the dirty work on this. So, while any bunch of Jews could hang out with radical leftists, real-life hoodlums, Zionist imperialists, and financial sharks, it became political & financial suicide for any white gentile to have even the most tenuous ties with ‘far-right’, ‘antisemitic’, or ‘racist’ individuals or organizations. And later, this was extended to ‘sexist’ and ‘homophobic’ figures. Because Jewish media made such a big stink about McCarthyism and Red Scare, it was bad form to point out that elite colleges and media had many leftist and even far-leftist types. It was even worse to point out that many of these leftists were Jewish or closely affiliated with powerful Jews. Such noticing was deemed ‘antisemitic’, ‘paranoid’, and ‘red-baiting’.
In contrast, Jews and their allies could blow the whistle on the even the flimsiest connection between white gentiles(especially white conservatives) and anyone with the slightest odor of ‘hate’. Remember how the media deemed it bad form to make a big deal out of Obama’s ties with Bill Ayers and Rev. Wright. However, the media went after Trump for being supported by David Duke even though Trump never met Duke. Trump was told to disavow a man he’d never avowed in the first place. In this climate, Jews and Liberals could maintain connections and alliances with the Left and even Far Left whereas American Conservatives and white gentiles couldn’t venture beyond Conservatism Inc. The Right has been so vilified that many Americans believe that even the moderate Right is worse than the farthest Left. And if young people at least were read about and were taught about the horrors of communism during the Cold War, most of that has gone down the memory hole because most college professors hardly touch on the evils committed by the radical left in the 20th century. This is why we have the "There is only one side" mentality at Charlottesville. The Alt Right cannot even exercise their basic Constitutional Rights, whereas Antifa lunatics can run wild, attack people, and destroy property, but still be tolerated by authorities that take orders from Jewish elites.
Through ideas and idols, the ‘left’ has thoroughly indoctrinated and ‘icontrinated’ the majority of Americans into believing that there is only one truth, and there is no room for debate or discussion. And yet, things are actually even more impoverished ideologically and morally because even the real Left has been effectively paralyzed. Even though there are still many Marxist and communist types in universities, they exert almost zero influence on culture and power. They either spend most of their time on ridiculous 50-gender issues OR fixate on trivial stuff like ‘body positivity’, ‘slut pride’, or ‘empowerment’ through pop culture.
The End of History, in gloating over the fall of communism and the false god of Marxism, left the Power with only one objective: Power. Francis Fukuyama’s Liberal Triumphalism meant a death knell not only to Communism and Fascism but to religion, tradition, community, culture, patriotism, family, national sovereignty, and etc. Granted, those values had already eroded so much by the fall of communism. But as long as the communist empire existed, many people in the West still felt invested in and bound together by some great cause and conviction: To defeat the Evil Empire, like Rocky defeated Ivan Drago in part IV. But when the Soviet Empire collapsed, there really was nothing standing but power and greed. Though Fukuyama declared Liberalism as champion, he couldn’t have been more wrong. As events would prove, the real winner of the Cold War was Jewish supremacism. By the end of the Cold War, Jews had taken over most top institutions and industries. Since most Jews claimed to be ‘liberal’, they could have favored liberal values over Jewish interests, but blood turned out to be more powerful than ink among Jews. Unlike Wasps who really went from racial mindset to an ideological and liberal one, Jews moved away from liberalism to neo-tribalism. Jews, who’d been proud of their defense of civil liberties(even for Neo-Nazis) through their support of the ACLU, lost interest in tolerance & free speech and increasingly pushed Political Correctness in media and academia. With every year, journalism had a tighter list of do’s and don’ts. And universities went from a breeding ground for dissent and debate to a place of consensus based on indoctrination and intimidation. Increasingly, more ideologically charged classes and sessions became Mandatory for all students. If the Right became morally and ideologically restricted and curtailed(to the point where Conservatives could only defend abstract principles like individual liberty and private property but couldn’t invoke any pride in whiteness or European heritage, even though, for some reason, it was mandatory for them to fervently support Jewish pride and Israel), the Left was ignored and treated as irrelevant. Even though Marxists were not defacto banned like the race-ists and fascists from media and academia, they were treated as irrelevant nuisance, and indeed they were just that.
Too many former leftist boomers had made too much money and got too powerful. They’d seen the failure of the communist model in the Soviet Union. They’d seen the rise of China under capitalism. So, there was only one game in town, and it was capitalism. But if capitalism of yesteryear was associated closely with nationalism and liberalism(and rule of law), the new globalist capitalism raised the stakes of power and profit much higher, and so, the new elites of the state and big business no longer had any concern for the nation or the people. The people themselves became a nuisance, an obstacle to more profits and power for themselves. And the Rule of Law just came to be seen as outdated ‘regulations’. So, Wall Street was deregulated to the point where financial system operated like a casino. And with loosening morality in an America growing ever more shameless and degenerate, the business of gambling, that had once been considered a vice that should be restricted to a few cities, spread all over America. The most blatant example of this new kind of capitalism was in Russia in the 90s. Despite erosion of values, institutions, and morals, there was sufficient checks and balances in the US to prevent something on the scale of what happened in Russia. But following the fall of the Soviet Empire when the old controls were gone but a new one yet to develop, the Jewish globalist capitalists swooped into Russia to game the system and loot as much of Russian national property as possible. It was surely the biggest looting in the world history. This was the real End of History, which was the Beginning of the Power. A future of gangsterism and tribalism.
In this game, only those with fanatical power-lust and tribal zeal will come out on top. Those who only care about money will not win big. Bill Gates is super-rich as an individual, but he belongs to nothing bigger than himself. As for tribes without power-lust, they will be nothing. Amish have a tight-knit community, but they mean nothing to the world. Mormons do care about power/wealth and group cohesion, but Mormon are nowhere near the ability of Jews, and they lack tribal pride. Whatever that had been tribal and racial about Mormonism is no more. It is now in evangelical mode, and it won’t be long before it takes in too many dummies and non-whites. Jews are identity-zealots and power-obsessives. The only people who are comparable in the world today are the Chinese.
Even though many white gentiles are rich and powerful as individuals, they lack collective power because PC instilled white minds to disdain any power organized around whiteness or European themes. So, Europeans are going about Africanizing European identity and heritage. This has gone furthest in Sweden and the UK where even historical figures are made into blacks in TV shows and movies.
It’s as if blacks have a special claim and right to European history, heritage, and heroes. It’s no longer enough for blacks to have their own history and heritage. Because Africans have no written history and no record of great achievements, they want to take over white histories, legends, and mythologies. And since white people have grown so admiring of blacks in sports & pop culture, they want to present white history to blacks as a gift. Also, because whiteness has been so impugned, whites find it difficult to take pride in white heroes of history. The ONLY way they can make white history ‘good’ again is by turning white heroes into black ones. It’s like Alexander Hamilton as a white male is, well, just a ‘dead white male’, one of those ‘bad guys’, the villains of history responsible for all that went wrong with mankind. But if you turn him and other Founding Fathers into rapping Negroes, they are suddenly ‘cool’, and white people are allowed to get all excited about them.
Anyway, foreign policy is dirty business. While it’s true that all politicians are weasels and even politics-at-home is usually sleazy and slimy, there are still limits to what politicians can do at home. No matter how much Obama hated white conservatives, he couldn’t do against them what he did to Libya, Ukraine, and Syria. And even though the Jewish-run ‘liberal’ media lie through their teeth about whites and conservatives, they can’t lie about Americans the way they can lie about foreign nations and foreign affairs. The media told a big lie about Trayvon Martin and Ferguson, BUT it was nothing like the lies they told about Libya, Ukraine, and Syria that led to the destruction of entire nations. Also, because enough Americans still do care about what happens IN America, there are voices to counter and correct the Narrative pushed by Jewish-run MSM. Also, despite Obama and Holder’s support of BLM and other lunatics, they wouldn’t dare push the violence like they pushed the violence in Libya and Ukraine. At the very least, the Obama regime wouldn’t have dared to send air strikes against white conservatives who oppose BLM. In contrast, the NATO gained control of air space in Libya and dropped endless bombs on Gaddafi until the rebels closed in on the capital, captured the dictator, and lynched him to death. The US could do stuff like that with other nations because US laws, rights, and protections don’t apply to other nations and foreign peoples.
If there are bad guys in the US, the government must follow proper procedures to pursue and arrest the culprits or suspects. But on foreign lands, the US government can just rely on some unverified intelligence to send drone strikes to blow up ‘terrorists’ and if lots of innocent people get killed in the bargain, so what?
So, all the restraints that apply in the US don’t apply in other nations. Even though the elites of America are lowlife scum and would love to rule with an iron fist, as long as American domestic politics is national and proscribed by Rule of Law, they can’t act in pure gangster-nihilist mode. They must follow the rule book. Also, as representatives and servants of the American People, they must demonstrate their loyalty and concern for the American people. Even if these elites look down on most Americans as worthless losers, they can’t be candid about their feelings and must always assure the American people that they have the interests, rights, and protections of American people at heart.
But what happens with increasing Diversity that makes America resemble the world than a distinct nation? We’ve seen how US foreign policy works in other nations. The Deep State will do just about anything and stoop to any level to gain an advantage over other nations. If it takes spying, drone strikes, subversion, invasion, torture, and etc, so be it. Around the world, the US is dealing with strangers. Since they are strangers, the US government owes them no due process and respect. Since they’re strangers, the US government doesn’t have to represent and protect them. The US government is free to do anything to gain the advantage against such strange peoples all over the world. Also, there doesn’t need to be and indeed there can’t be any consistency of rules, values, or methodology in dealing with all those strange peoples because they are all different from the US and from each other. So, the US makes up new rules and concocts new methods for dealing with each people. In contrast, in domestic politics and governance within a single particular nation, people do expect the government to be consistent, predictable, and principled in its affairs. In national politics, the government doesn’t see the people of the nation as strangers but fellow countrymen bound by blood, values, history, and/or principles.
But if the US becomes more diverse, then the varied and diverse Americans will begin to see each other as strangers. During the Great Depression and WWII, the US government was white and most Americans were white. So, the white government looked upon the white masses as fellow countrymen. And when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, all Americans from top to bottom understood what it meant to be attacked by ‘Japs’. Hoover, Roosevelt, Truman, and Eisenhower had one thing in common in feeling a common bond with the American people who were seen as fellow countrymen. Even though there was ethnic diversity, most non-Anglos had been educated to be good patriots on the Anglo-American model. There was the black problem, but as blacks made up 10% of the population and aspired to be accepted and respected by white society, they too could be seen as fellow Americans. And especially beginning with Truman, there was a concerted effort to do right by the Negroes.
Now, of course, there was lots of corruption in politics and business back then as well. Politics being politics and business being business, corruption will always be with us. But when the nation was more cohesive, the US domestic policy was indeed based on the nationalist and patriotic sense that the government must do right by the people. In other words, the US government must not treat fellow Americans in the way it might treat Iranians, Guatemalans, Cubans, Vietnamese, Mexicans, and etc. If the US government and multi-national corporations approach foreign nations and strange peoples as just pawns, puppets, markets, or rivals/enemies in a ceaseless global gangster turf war, it simply wouldn’t do to see American people that way. Whether citizens of America are on the left or on the right, the US government must treat them all as fellow Americans with same protections under the law. In contrast, no such rules apply to foreign nations. It’s like, if a Muslim-American admires Osama Bin Laden and hates the US, he still has all the access to US government services, enjoys all the basic rights and protections, and has the same voting rights as any other American. In contrast, if he held such views in the Middle East, he could end up dying in drone strike. Or, if he’s fighting an enemy of Israel, he could be armed and funded by the CIA to commit acts of terror.
In contrast, it would be scandalous for the FBI or CIA to directly fund Antifa groups to attack white conservatives and patriots. But the US unreservedly funded and aided Neo-Nazi elements in Ukraine to topple the government there.
If a government acts more responsibly and restrained on the national level and in domestic mode than on the global level in foreign policy mode, what happens when excessive Diversity makes a nation into just a smaller version of the world? Even if the US still continues as a nation-state, will it act like one when it resembles a mini-world than a self-contained nation?
And if leaders like Roosevelt and Eisenhower felt a direct and deep connection with most Americans as fellow countrymen, how do the current government and Deep State look upon most Americans? Despite all the hollow rhetoric about how ‘diversity is our strength’, the fact is white elites in Deep State don't feel any real deep connection with Muslims, Mexicans, Asians, Hindus, Arabs, and host of other non-white groups. (And when non-whites reach elite status, they not only fail to form a bond with whites but lose the bond to their own people. They turn into political zombies.) Instead of growing nearer non-whites, these white elite operatives will only grow further apart from white Americans. The official line says white elites are one with non-whites, but the fact is they feel and remain separate from non-whites except in the most superficial way(and this accounts as to why globalized Western culture gets more superficial since it is only on such level that diverse people can communicate and get along). It’s a full-time job for elites to feel as one with ONE people. It’s impossible to feel one with over a 100 ethnic groups in the US. But because white elites must make an effort to connect with non-whites, they must disconnect their bonds and loyalties to whites. The end result is nothing but cynicism and nihilism. Unable to connect or really care about non-whites and no longer connected to whites, the only thing left for these Deep State elites is "what’s in it for me?" They just become soulless careerists whose only obsession is status, position, and privilege. To keep the status and rise higher, they will say and do ANYTHING to get what’s theirs. Isn’t this what we see in a soulless careerist robot like James Comey? This also goes for Hillary Clinton. In the end, did she care about anything? Did she care about white people or the working class? Of course, that would have been anathema in New America. White leaders caring about white people? Why, that would be ‘nazi’ and ‘racist’. So, did she really care all about all those trannies, slut priders, Muslims, blacks, Mexicans, Hindus, Chinese, and etc., the kind of people with whom she has zero cultural connection or rapport? No, it was all just for show. Like Comey, she isn’t allowed to connect with whites and is unable to connect with non-whites. All she had left was self-serving careerism. Same with Theresa May and all the other cretins.
Diversity means no shared standards, values, meanings, or identities. That is why foreign policy is a game of gangsters. Since the rules, values, loyalties, norms, and the narrative of one nation are so different from those of other nations, the only way that nations can play the game is through distrust, cynicism, espionage, and dirty tricks more commonly associated with gangsters.
Indeed, when we compare the FBI and the CIA, why does the latter have more sinister connotations? FBI has skeletons in its closet too, but because it’s a domestic and national law enforcement organization, it must be careful not to deviate too far from the Rule of Law that protects the rights of all Americans. Americans care more about a wrong done to a US citizen by US government than a wrong done to 100,000 foreigners by the same government.
In contrast, the CIA has been involved in outright subversion, espionage, aid to terrorists, torture, spreading fake propaganda, meddling in foreign elections, bribery, and aiding Pentagon in the invasion of other nations.
Recent revelations about the FBI show how corrupt the agency can be, but the FBI has also played a prominent role in taking down organized crime in the US. In contrast, the CIA has been linked with organized criminals, terrorist, and even neo-Nazis in its nihilistic effort to do just about anything to spread the oligarchic hegemony of the US. As the US becomes more like the world, the rulers of the US will act more like CIA than the FBI in dealing with the American people. The people will no longer be seen a citizens and fellow countrymen but as pawns in a game. Consider the Carol Reed film THE THIRD MAN. When the nihilist American Harry Lime was in war-torn Austria, he didn't see the people there as his fellow countrymen. No, they were just units, pawns, or fleas. He felt no connection to them, and their lives didn’t matter to him. He acted only for himself and for money.
In the current America, the problem goes deeper than white elites no longer feeling a bond with white Americans and being unable to really connect with non-whites. There is a power above that of white elites, and of course, it’s the Jewish elites. Too many Jews are in arrogant, contemptuous, and hostile supremacist mode in relation to gentiles. Jews mainly identify with fellow Jews all over the world than with fellow Americans, most of whom are goyim. American Jews cared more about Soviet Jews than for fellow Americans who might be Catholic or Baptist. And once those Soviet Jews came to the US, they felt far closer to Jews in UK, France, and Israel than with fellow Americans who happen to be gentile.
Did Madeline Albright feel anything for the 500,000 Iraqi children that might have died as the result of US sanctions concocted by Zionists? No. Why not? Because the kids weren’t Jewish. As a thought experiment, let’s suppose Israel comes under the rule of someone as ‘evil’ as Saddam Hussein. Suppose the US calls out on this Jewish Hussein who is denounced as a 'new hitler'. Suppose the US calls for sanctions that might starve 100,000s of Jewish kids to death. Would Jews support such a policy in the name of getting rid of an evil dictator? No way. Jews care for fellow Jews. That, in and of itself, is good. A people should care for their own kind. Now, it’s possible for a people to love their own kind the most but still respect and care about other peoples. This quality is woefully missing from most Jews who will cause any amount of harm to others just so Jews can have it all. The sheer obnoxiousness and vileness of Jews as they’ve gained supreme power in the US and EU have so clearly illustrated why this thing called ‘antisemitism’ was so rife throughout history. Jews will tell any amount of lies and pull any number of dirty tricks to get their way. The likes of Max Boot and David Brooks are hardly different from Jennifer Rubin Erderly and Stephen Glass in their shameless and insane obsession to spin any story and invent any nonsense to push their agenda that, despite the bogus ‘universalist’ or ‘humanitarian’ rhetoric, really just comes down to, "Is it good for the Jews?"
With uber-elites such as that, with white elites serving them while being disconnected from white masses and unconnected to non-white masses, with white masses no longer represented and led by elites, and with so many non-whites splintered along racial, ethnic, religious, and other lines(and their children having trashy stupid pop culture as their only culture, Homomania as their only faith, and PC as their only rule book), the US will no longer resemble a nation but a mini-world or a mini-empire. Then, it is only natural that US politics will go from the mode of national policy to the mode of foreign policy. It will no longer be a case of elites seeing Americans as fellow countrymen but as a Glob-ful of strangers. And in a world of strangers, everyone will be out for the only thing that still matters: Status, Position, and Privilege.
Instead of Puerto Ricans becoming Americanized, Americans are becoming Puerto-Ricanized.