Accusations of 'Antisemitism' serve as Moral Cover for Jews who act out Antisemitic Stereotypes — Blacks use 'Racism' the same way — Jewish Supremacism requires more than mere Meritocracy — The Myth of Jewish Sainthood as Jews are after Worldly Power, not Spiritual Truth(except in worship of themselves as the new god)

The monstrous Sackler Family whose pharmaceuticals led to the deaths of 100,000s of white people, but NO ONE cares in the Media run by Jews

JEWISH DIAMOND MERCHANT 'TROPES'

The Antisemitism Paradox is as follows: Jews accuse people of 'antisemitism' to get away with acting like 'antisemitic' stereotypes. There's also the 'Racism' Paradox. Blacks accuse people of 'racism' to get away with acting like 'racist' stereotypes. It's like bad people accusing others of defaming them as 'bad' in order to get away with acting bad.

While Anti-Jewish feelings and attitudes can get out of control(and even become cancerous as with Adolf Hitler and the Nazis), there's no getting around the fact that broad stereotypes about certain groups are based on reality. Indeed, something like Nazism was an extreme reaction to bad Jewish behavior. The radical character of this hatred was pathological, but it was not an animus based on insane fantasies that slandered totally innocent Jews. (Furthermore, Nazi evil had much in common with Jewish evil as both were expressions of racial supremacism and arrogance.) It's like communism was an extreme and dangerous reaction to capitalism, but many of its criticism and condemnations of capitalism were justified(and even defenders of capitalism noted its problems and saw the need for reform and some measure of socialism as counter-balance.)
If the dark tragedy of extreme antisemitism, such as Nazism, was that it could only see the BAD in Jews, thereby condemning all Jews into objects deserving of hatred and even elimination, the dark tragedy of the post-WWII period has been a mindless Philosemitism that could see only the GOOD in Jews. This wouldn't have mattered if Jews were a powerless people or a middling population, but it became the most dangerous mindset in a world where Jews have amassed supremacist power over the world. An attitude of willful naivete and sappy obeisance to the most powerful people in the world is dangerous, especially when the attitude of many Jews isn't much different from their arch-enemy of history, the Nazis. Jewish Power is based on Master Race contempt for goyim, though this aspect is obfuscated by Jewish-controlled media's mantras about 'social justice'. Right, all that talk of 'equity', that must be white Jews are in an equitable position vis-a-vis goyim. Notice that even in industries and institutions where white presence/power has been slashed to smithereens, there are cries of 'too many whites', but there can never be talk of 'too many Jews' even in fields where the 2% constitute the overwhelming majority as owners, managers, or influencers.

The problem for Jews is, even as they fear 'antisemitic' stereotypes or 'tropes' that cast them in a negative light, they are committed to and obsessed with(and even addicted to) doing the things associated with 'antisemitic stereotypes/tropes'. This is because too many Jews(especially at the top) aren't content merely to be good Jews who get along on equal footing with goyim. They aren't even satisfied with the surplus wealth, privilege, and power that come via meritocracy. As Jews have higher IQ, a purely meritocratic system will ensure that Jews will attain and control more; and as all barriers to Jewish access and ascension have faded over the years, Jews have much to gain from meritocracy alone. But even that isn't enough for Jews because meritocracy, properly applied, puts a limit even on the talented. While meritocracy favors the more talented group over others, it doesn't ensure total power for the advantaged group. Jews aren't content with mere over-representation; they must have overwhelming control over key institutions and industries, which is why Jewish finance sector is propped up by Jews in the justice department and deep state. (The notion of 'too big to fail' means Jews have more cards up their sleeve than mere meritocracy. Even when they gamble and lose, they are bailed out. And even when Neocon pundits were so wrong about the Iraq War, they are favored for hiring by Jewish-run media and think-tanks. Consider that miserable worm Max Boot.) And of course, Jewish finance sector favors Jewish ventures in Big Tech and other areas. If a Jew and a goy come up with the same great idea, guess who will receive favorable financing?

And Jews want to control the icons and idols that ensure irrational emotions in favor of Jewish Agenda. Manipulation of icons means Jews get to control the gods, and then Jews can preach: Jews = Holocaust = Holiness. Yet, 'sacralization' of Jews, far from ensuring saintly Jewish behavior, has only encouraged Jewish gangster behavior. Shielded by the aura of holiness(whereby any critical view of Jewish people, power, and/or culture could be deemed 'antisemitic', thereby 'nazi'), Jews became the 'made men' of America.
It's the law of human nature that, 99 times out of 100, more exaltation leads to more execrable behavior. Why were so many princes and princesses such spoiled snotty louts? All the adulation made Josef Stalin, Adolf Hitler, and Mao Zedong more megalomaniacal, arrogant, and tyrannical. (No wonder the Christian Mythology of Man ascending to God-status in Heaven necessitated that He be dragged through the mud and pay the dues. But then, the mythology says Jesus was God to begin with.) When man is allowed god-status, his ego is filled up with arrogance and a sense of entitlement, which leads to hubris. Apotheosis leads to appalling behavior.

This is why saints and holy men are expected to relinquish worldly power and wealth. To gain higher spiritual worth, one must abandon material ambition in the world of man. But Jews paint themselves as the new christs on account of the Shoah Narrative, and then use their sham-holiness as moral shield to amass more wealth, privilege, and power than mankind has ever before. Thus, Jewish saintliness is a fraud. While there are surely individual Jews who, as survivors or historians, tried to derive wisdom from the tragedy, too many Jews have used the Shoah as Shoah-business or a moral license to cheat, lie, steal, and even commit mass-murders against peoples deemed as enemies or rivals of Jews.
And this is what's so frustrating about the lectures, sermons, and warnings about 'Antisemitism'. Instead of cautioning goyim about the dangers of 'antisemitic' stereotypes while, at the same time, reminding Jews not to confirm them by practice, anti-antisemitism has come down to Jews doing whatever they please(thus certifying some of the hoariest 'antisemitic' cliches) regardless of morality or decency while the rest of us must forgo any criticism of Jewish power & abuses lest it be 'antisemitic'. It's turned into a sick game of 'Heads We Win, Tails You Lose'. Thus emboldened, Jewish behavior has gotten worse and worse, culminating in the dark year of 2020 when Jewish Power paralyzed the world economy with Covid Hysteria nonsense and terrorized the Western World with BLM madness to bully the white race into shame and submission. Of course, when it comes to sheer death and mayhem, the biggest victims of Jewish Insanity have been the Arabs and/or Muslims in the Middle East, at least those who live under regimes that refuse to be puppet-partners of the Zionist-controlled US.

Jews and blacks are the biggest destroyers of the West with their use of moral outrage as cover for outrageous immorality. So, blacks will say there's this 'racist' stereotype of blacks as criminals, implying that anyone who notices reality is a 'racist'. And if one can't help noticing it despite the admonition, just pretend it's 'teens' or 'youths' who are doing it. And on occasion that blacks do admit the criminality, it is blamed on systemic racism or 'history of white supremacism', which means black crime is reparations-by-other-means or rightful-revenge against Evil Whitey. Of course, blacks coast on such delusions with crucial support from Jews who are experts at moral sophistry. Because of Jewish support(and use of blacks), status-aspiring blacks tend to develop a moral blind spot where Jewish Power is concerned. If blacks are indeed opposed to all forms of supremacism, they would call out on Zionism but know all-too-well that they'll be relegated to Field Ni--er status whereas those who denounce Evil Whitey but overlook Evil Jew will be awarded with House Negro status, and of course, Oprah and Obama were mega-advertisers in this regard.

At any rate, the group doing the most harm to the West from above is the Jews, and the one doing the most harm from below is the blacks. If Jewish finance won't get you, black fist will. And yet, both groups are shielded from criticism because of the taboos of 'antisemitism' and 'racism', which are designed less to suppress unthinking bigotry against Jews and blacks than to protect truly bad Jewish and black behaviors from exposure and criticism. In other words, Jews privately know they are addicted to supremacist power and ethno-arrogance; they want everything and know that they must play dirty to get it; only playing clean according to principles won't do it. That means Jews must often act like 'antisemitic' stereotypes to get what they want, and what better way to shield this behavior from scrutiny than by howling about 'antisemitism' at every turn?
Same goes with blacks. Blacks are no longer content with promises of equality and freedom. They savor being the thug and acting like dey be kangz and shi*. They love to thump people in the streets, rob & loot, rape & pillage, and howl like idiots. They are addicted to acting like crazyass ni--az. So, just like Jews with their constant alarmism over 'antisemitism', what better way to shield bad black behavior from pushback than by hollering about 'racism' at every turn?

So, neither 'antisemitism' taboo nor 'racism' taboo exists to remind us that there are good Jews along with bad Jews(as the case is with all other groups) but to silence our noticing of bad Jews and bad blacks. Normal morality would lead us to praise the good about a people while condemning the bad. So, good things done by whites deserve admiration whereas bad things done by whites are reason for condemnation. And this should apply to every group. But with Jews and blacks, normal morality doesn't apply. Even the bad things done by Jews must either be praised(as somehow 'good') or ignored. Same with blacks.
Of course, normal morality doesn't apply to whites either as even the good things they've done must come under hyper-scrutiny and somehow be spun to seem 'bad' or at least questionable or marred. It's as if Jews are observed through the telescope whereas whites through a microscope. Jews are like gods in heaven who are far above us, and we must peer through a telescope for a glimpse of their greatness. In contrast, whites are pored through a microscope for every blemish. It's like Jews as diamond merchants. They examine the diamond for the slightest flaw and emphasize it over the soundness of the diamond as a whole. We are supposed to see radiant holocaust-holiness even in a Jew covered in muck whereas note the slightest blemish(of 'micro-aggression') even in a white of great achievement. This way, even a terrible Jew seen through a telescope will seem better than a good white seen through a microscope. Whiteness is like the stained fork in the Monty Python restaurant skit. No matter how trivial, it is cause for guilt, shame, and self-annihilation. Fork politics against Folk politics.

Examples of Jews using the 'antisemitic' card to cover up actions confirming 'antisemitic' stereotypes abound. Consider Jews and Pat Buchanan. In the runup to the Gulf War in 1990, Buchanan wrote a column noting that the biggest promoters for war were Israeli Firsters whereas most of the casualties will come from whites and blacks. Abe Rosenthal of New York Times howled 'antisemitism' and accused Buchanan of Blood Libel, i.e. Buchanan suggested Jewish sacrifice of gentile blood for Jewish interests. Soon after, even William F. Buckley Jr. was piling on Pat Buchanan who, in a few years, would become persona non grata in the GOP, especially as he reversed his support of 'free trade'.

Now, what is Neocon Foreign Policy but a case of exploiting goy muscle and sacrificing goy blood for Jewish ends? If anything, Buchanan's criticism wasn't strong enough. Indeed, US foreign policy as Blood Libel has been true whether Democrats or Republicans were in control of government(as US politics is a game of who-gets-to-be-top-puppets-of-Jews). Puppet Bill Clinton appointed heartless Madeleine Albright who said it was 'worth it' to sacrifice countless Arab lives. George W. Bush and his Neocon crew waged wars in which many thousands of American soldiers were killed or wounded and countless more Arab lives were destroyed, and these conflicts were essentially Wars for Israel. And Barack Obama was no better, laying Libya and Syria to waste at the behest of Jews who gave him money.
So, Abe Rosenthal's shrieking about 'antisemitism' wasn't to prove the falsehood of 'antisemitic' stereotypes but to give moral cover to Jewish behavior that all-too-often validates those stereotypes.
It's like blacks going on a looting spree and then bitching about how it's 'racist' to stereotype blacks as robbers and looters. That the West has willingly succumbed to such foulness is a sure sign of soul-sickness at the core, not least because cancerous Jewish Power has taken over the institutions. The sheer disregard for goyim is evident in what the Sackler dynasty did to white working class by addicting them to opioids. But even the GOP, the so-called white party, was deathly silent on that matter. One worthless Negro, George Floyd, dies from drug overdose, and Jews turn him into the biggest thing since Anne Frank, but when hundreds of thousands of whites died from dangerously addictive drugs peddled by Jewish crooks, and no one cared, and of course, white working class demise continued under Trump who, to save his own skin from Jewish attacks, had little to say but 'Muh Israel'.

Abe Foxman the Jew and Joe Biden the Goy: Master and Dog

Of course, the Neocon Wars validate yet another 'antisemitic' stereotype. Not only are Jews willing to sacrifice goy blood for Jewish ends but Jews use the power of money to control goy politicians and deep state goons like so many puppets and dogs. What honest person, in this day and age, can deny that Jewish Power controls virtually all politicians in a dog-and-pony show? Even Donald Trump and Marjorie Taylor, though vilified 24/7 by Jews high and low, have little to say but "Muh Israel" and "I gladly sucked Netanyahu's pud." The relationship between US politicians and Jewish donors is like that between Hollywood celebrities and Jewish moguls. If you want to be a star, you have to get on your knees, suck, and make sure to swallow. There's truth to the notion of D.C. as Hollywood for Ugly People(though Hollywood isn't exactly pretty either these days).

The 'antisemitic trope' of Jewish Money in politics leads us to another 'antisemitic trope'(that too is demonstrated as truer than false by Jewish behavior). Jews throw a lot of money around, but why are they so rich? Now, Jews are bound to be richer than other groups because they are smarter and thrive in a meritocratic system. It explains why there are so many Jewish doctors, lawyers, accountants, consultants, professors, and etc. But it's not Jewish doctors and lawyers who dominate money in politics. It's the billionaires and mega-billionaires. Did all those billionaire Jews on Wall Street really rake in all that cash by brilliance alone? Or is there a New Boys Network?
Worse, if the Old Boys Network dominated by Wasps could be called out(because there was no taboo against anti-Wasp sentiments and, furthermore, plenty of reform-minded whites were committed to self-criticism), the New Boys Network is a closed system because of the taboo against calling out on bad Jewish behavior(why, it'd be 'antisemitic'!) and the knee-jerk tribalism among Jews to circle the wagons against goyim. And with Jews in law firms & courts with further support from Jews in the Fed and Deep State, Wall Street Jews can play a rigged game and rake in countless billions... and if their reckless gambles were to fail, they could always count on bail-outs premised on 'Too Big To Fail', which really means 'Too Jew to be Through'.
And even legal means by which some Jews got stinking rich only validate 'antisemitic tropes' of Jews and their close association with the vice industry. Take gambling, which became cancerous and spread all over America as Jews consolidated elite power in the US(and of course, Jews have also spearheaded marijuana legalization and are positioned to dominate the business). Gambling is really mass-theft, and it has utterly degraded the 'family values' theme of the GOP that relies on Vegas money. What do Jewish casino moguls do with all that money? They turn politicians into servants of Mammon and puppets of Israel. That the GOP profusely eulogized a cretin like Sheldon Adelson illustrates how far the cancer has spread.

Another 'antisemitic' stereotype is the suspicion that Jews care more about their own kind, aka World Jewry, than about any goy-majority nation in which they are citizens. But who can deny this? Jewish behavior has been signaling this forever. Who can deny that Jews in Russia, Jews in Poland, Jews in Germany, Jews in UK, Jews in the US, Jews in Mexico, and etc. all feel closer to one another than to goy folks in the respective nations? How else can the New Cold War with Russia be explained except as a case of Russian Jews, US Jews, and World Jewry in general conspiring to gain total control of that nation, much like Jews have already done so in the US and UK?
One thing for sure, the last thing a Jew in a goy nation wants to see is goy nationalism. Now, if a Jew in Poland were indeed a Polish patriot(without 'dual loyalty'), he would welcome Polish nationalism, that is, if indeed, the 'antisemitic trope' of Jews being unpatriotic and/or treasonous is untrue. But, Jews in Poland hate Polish patriotism, and Jews in Hungary hate Hungarian nationalism. Not only do they want nothing to do with goy national pride but they seek to suppress it. Now, some Jews will say that they oppose goy nationalism because it's small-minded and potentially prejudiced. Therefore, Jews support a colorblind value system where no one is judged by the color of his skin or the label of his ethnicity, i.e. all the world must be turned into the brotherhood-of-man. Jews have especially made this argument in the US, supposedly a nation founded on universal principles of liberty and justice. Thus, even if it's true that Jews are disloyal to goy patriotism in any given nation, it's not out of wickedness or treachery(as 'Anti-Semites' charge) but out of higher idealism and humanitarian principles. But such self-justification yet proves another 'antisemitic trope', that of the two-faced weasely Jew.

After all, if American Jews were indeed committed to colorblindness and universal justice, they would reject Jewish identity & interests as they demand and expect whites to abandon white identity & interests. But the very Jews who tell whites to give up their own identity & interests in favor of universality & equality then turn around and say whites must favor Jews & Israel uber alles. It's two-faced and weasely. So, whites must give up white identity in favor of universality but then betray universality in favor of Jewish identity. It's just bait-and-switch. It's enough to drive a people schizo, and perhaps it explains why so many white people today seem to be totally nutsoid. Under the spell of Jews, their minds are filled with an unresolvable contradiction but must carry on as if it all makes sense because the 'antisemitism' taboo is too powerful. After all, if you question Jews, you must be a 'Nazi', and there's nothing worse than that. In a nation where even Donald Trump and white conservatives(who are much-abused and constantly mocked by Jews) go out of their way to bleat 'Muh Israel', questioning Jewish Power is simply out of the question. In a way, white conzos who are being destroyed by Jews are like the victims of Stalin. Even as the latter were sent to the Gulag or condemned for execution, they continued to believe in Stalin and sang praises to him... to their last breath.

So, if we examine the Jewish con-game, it goes as follows. Jews say Goy Nationalism is bad. Jews say Universalism is good. So, Goyim give up their own nationalism in favor of universalism. But then, Jews say goy must favor Jewish Identity-Politics(or Jewish Idolatry) over universalism. Why? Because... it's the 'patriotic' thing to do. In other words, American Patriotism is fundamentally about sucking up to Jews. Imagine that. The trick is really to make goyim reject their own identity to favor Jewish identity. But then, precisely because Jews fear that some goyim might catch on to the BS, they use media, academia, and whore politicians to fool the masses that praising Jews and supporting Israel are the highest form of patriotism.
Now, why would the case of a goy people of a goy majority nation championing Israel, a foreign nation, be the highest expression of patriotism? Since when is the celebration of the Other a matter of 'true patriotism'? After all, patriotism is about Our People and Our Nation, not Those People and Their Nation(or Empire). Imagine British Imperialists telling Hindus in India that the highest form of Indian patriotism is allegiance to England and the British Empire. Sadly, the collaborator elites can be bought with money and/or threatened with disgrace/destruction, and the masses are just dumb enough to fall under mantric sway. When something is said over and over and over by authorities of both 'left' and 'right', it just becomes one of those New Normals that no one really thinks about. Jews toy with the goy as if they are god messing with Job.

Some members of the Italian Mafia once tried to pull the same stunt that Jews have pulled over America. To protect Mafia or Cosa Nostra activities from scrutiny and criticism, they fronted Italian-American 'civil rights' organizations that complained it was prejudiced against Italian-Americans to cast light on organized crime within the community. So, exposing the mafia or Italian-American criminality was tantamount to defamation against the Italian-American community as a whole. But, this shtickolini was really to protect those very criminal activities from investigation. But just like the Rosato Brothers and Pantengeli were small potatoes to Hyman Roth in THE GODFATHER PART 2, the Italian-Americans didn't have the mental sparks, financial firepower, tribal unity(as family loyalty divided the Italian-Americans into warring clans), and spiritual inspiration(such as Shoah Business that proved to be invaluable to Jews as moral shield and cudgel) to gain power over America, especially by ousting Wasps from the top position.

IT'S NOT THE RUSSIANS OR CHINESE; WHO HAS TOTAL SUPREMACY OVER AMERICA

Empire vs Alliance: The World Significance of Jewish-controlled US Empire at odds with the Alliance of Sovereign Nations, especially Russia, China, and Iran — Why Europe became more servile to an America taken over by Jewish Supremacist Power

The key difference in the current global affairs is it comes down to Empire vs Alliance.

On one side, there is the US empire and the countries under its iron wing. Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan are mere puppets of this empire in the East. And EU is the puppet in the West. The empire has only one power center. The advantage of this arrangement is the concentration of power and easily understood command structure. US and its 'partners' are like Soviet Union and Warsaw Pact nations during the Cold War. There is a clear chain of command. US gives the orders, the rest follows.
If the rest was less willing to follow Donald Trump, it was because the Deep State had the real power and Trump was regarded as a nuisance(soon to be gotten rid of by means fair and foul). Of great significance is that American power isn't only military, monetary, material, 'mammonic', and market-oriented but moral(and spiritual), especially because Jews control the gods. All of the empire are united in worship of the same gods: The icons, idols, & narratives of the Jews, blacks, homos, and 'diversity/inclusivity'(as defined by Jews, of course, as Israel is allowed to be ultra-nationalist and even supremacist).
Western Europe was less reverential to the US when the latter was ruled by Anglo-Americans, aka Wasps. While Wasps had pride, power, and prestige, they didn't go around making themselves out to be holy saint-victims innately possessed of sanctity. They represented earthly power and could be challenged and expected to be. So, even though Europeans were subordinate to Anglo-American Power for military, monetary, and material reasons, they didn't feel morally(or spiritually) inferior to White Americans; indeed, the Ugly American(which usually meant White Christian American) tropes were common in Europe among all classes.
Sure, America bailed out Europe after WWII and defended it from the USSR, but it was seen as morally marred by the history of 'genocide'(of the American Indians), slavery, 'racism', and neo-imperialism. Indeed, Anti-Americanism was vogue among Europeans during the Vietnam War when the US was lambasted as the New Nazi-like power. Anglo-Americans were giants but not gods; they were supremely powerful but not sacred. Sanctity was bestowed upon the seemingly pitiable Jews.

During the Cold War, Europeans didn't think too much of the sacralization of Jews. After all, WWII & the Shoah and exodus to Israel(and America) had greatly reduced the number of Jews in Europe. Thus, special sympathy for Jews seemed mostly a matter of sentiment, a luxury that Europeans could afford. And besides, the two great empires, US and USSR, following WWII were ruled by white goyim, and no one thought Jews would come to control either. Western Europe spearheaded the sacralization of Jews at a time when the Jewish Community seemed an object of pity. And White Americans also shared in this sacralization without foreseeing the future of Jewish Power in America.
When a powerless people are sacralized, it may be indulgent and naive, but it can't do much harm if they remain powerless. Sucking down to the powerless, as opposed to sucking up to the powerful, can't do much harm. After all, American Indians were sort-of-sacralized in the 60s, but it was inconsequential as Indians lacked to means to gain power. We could sacralize Eskimos or Australian Aborigines, but it'd come to nothing as those people will never amass power.

But, when whites in Europe and US sacralized Jews at their moment of weakness, they utterly lacked foresight as to future consequences. If you take pity on a little baby bunny, at most it will grow into a harmless rabbit. But if you dote on a tiger cub, it will grow into a giant predator. Jews with their higher IQ, pushy personality, vengeful memory, and covenant-based supremacism, had the potential of (re)gaining tremendous power and taking control of the West. When Europeans sacralized Jews as helpless Holocaust Survivors. And they thought the US, the master over Europe for the foreseeable future, would be ruled by Anglo-Americans or White-Christian Americans. As long as the US-as-lone-superpower was ruled by white Christians, Europeans could hold their own in terms of moral discourse and argument. While Europeans felt a certain degree of gratitude toward White Americans, they felt zero guilt toward them.
But because Europeans had sacralized Jews as a race of saint-victims(premised on heavy European guilt as mass-murderers or collaborators in the mass murder), they were poorly position to say NO to American Power were Jews to becoming the ruling elites of the US. Wasps were giants but not gods, but Jews came to control the gods. As Europeans chose to worship Jews as an eternally tragic and holy people, they felt compelled to cave to whatever gods controlled by the Jews. Saying NO to Jewish demands was a no-no, tantamount to heresy. If Jews said 'You celebrate Diversity', Europeans said 'We celebrate Diversity'. If Jews said 'You Cuck to Negroes', Europeans said 'We Cuck to Negroes'. If Jews said, 'You bend over to globo-homo', Europeans said 'We bend over to globo-homo'.

Plans for Holocaust memorial next to UK parliament

Jewish-controlled US has infinitely more power over the EU than Anglo-America ever did during the Cold War. Jews are deemed holy whereas Anglo-Americans never were. Europe in the Cold War had to shine Anglo-America's shoes, but EU today has to kiss the Jewish-America's toes, just like cucky whites grovel at the feet of blacks and wash them. In this sense, the so-called 'free world' is really like a theocracy. The US empire of old ruled by White Christians was admired and feared for its money and military, or earthly matters. But US empire ruled by Jews is obeyed as the new Vatican. "Oh holy Jews, please tell us what gods to worship next." If Jews say, "Men with wigs are women", the cucks in US and EU fall all over themselves to recite the catechism of "Men are women". There is a kind of quasi-spiritual unity in the empire as all are expected to worship the same gods. They got homo parades in Japan, BLM marches in S. Korea, and pro-empire Poles are totally into globo-homo and Great Replacement for Poland. Winning plaudits and approval from divine Jews, holy homos, and noble Negroes is their highest sense of good.

The disadvantage of the current Empire is that the puppet states, while servile and pliable, lack any real sense of innate pride and purpose. They are like mercenaries or puppets always taking orders or looking over their shoulders with no internal sense of worth. They are parrots than patriots. And even though Jews control the gods, the current idols are more of fashion and fancy than substance and meaning. Indeed, if Jew-run US were to vanish overnight, so many minions in the Empire would be completely lost as they utterly lack agency as individuals and pride as sovereign nationals. They would be like TV sets that no longer receive the signals. Instead of pulling up moisture from the roots, they grab vibes from the air.

On the other side, there is the Alliance. Russia and China are independent and sovereign. Russia doesn't own China, China doesn't own Russia. They are allies out of common interests and mutual understanding. Far weaker is Iran, but it too is no puppet. It has an independent government with its own course of action. Iran chooses to work with Russia and China out of shared interests, not out of servility. Russia doesn't tell China what to do, China doesn't tell Russia what to do, Russia doesn't tell Iran what to do, China doesn't tell Iran what to do, Iran doesn't tell Russia what to do, Iran doesn't tell China what to do. Rather, they understand they face similar challenges and coordinate efforts. There is real strength in this as each nation has its pride and sovereignty. The weakness, however, is the three nations can never be as united as the empire with its single command center.

Not only are Russia, China, and Iran(and nations like Venezuela) independent in government, military, and monetary policy but they control their own gods. Russian government has its own gods centered on Russian history & culture, China has its own gods rooted in Chinese history & CCP mythos, Iran has its own gods based on Islam & Persian history. Venezuela has its own narrative of the Bolivarian Revolution. They are truly diverse in the proper meaning of the word. Not only diverse as different races but in values and narratives, and they respect the right of others to have their own gods. China doesn't tell Russia to revere Confucius and Mao, and Russia doesn't tell China to build Orthodox Churches or monuments to Alexander Nevsky.

In contrast, the US empire requires all its puppets to bow down to Globo-Jewgromo, or globalist worship of Jews, Negroes, and Homos. Indeed, all countries within the empire must elevate Jews, Negroes, Homos, and Foreigners/Immigrants above their own people, culture, and history. Whether it's France, Germany, Sweden, Japan, Taiwan, Canada, Australia, or whatever, the Globo-Shlomo Empire demands that they suppress nativism(in favor of invasivism), national pride, & unity-heritage-memory, and instead favor foreigners/immigrants, celebrate the minority homos, adulate the Negro, and remember the Holocaust. In a broad sense, the Alliance is 'polytheist' as each nation has control over its own gods, whereas the Empire is 'monotheist' as all within the empire are required to worship the gods controlled by Jews.

Janus-like India is the big outlier in this. On the one hand, it plays along with the US empire, especially in its stance against China. But when push comes to shove, it often chooses an independent path that is unthinkable for Japan or Germany, even for France and UK. Another outlier is nations like Hungary. Though part of EU, it insists on nationalism and its own cultural values.

Nations that side with the Alliance are accepted as sovereign nations. In contrast, nations that join the empire(or have been forced into it) must cuck to Jews, wave the homo flag, hail the Negro, and welcome the Great Replacement.

The biggest problem for the empire is it's an empire-empire, which makes everything far more complicated. In the past, most of America was White Christian, and American Empire reflected White Christian power, pride, and values. White men were tough, hardy, proud, and ready to fight. Today, the US is controlled by Jews, i.e. white christians are totally cucked to Zion. On the one hand, Jews need whites to be hardy managers and soldiers for the Empire, but on the other, Jews need whites to be guilt-ridden toadies without white pride. Jews both weaken whiteness and expect it to carry the burden of empire. It's like castrating someone and then adding more load on his back.
Still, white christians are found at all levels of the US empire, and to a naive outsider it may still seem as if the US is a White Christian Power. After all, Joe Biden is said to be a catholic. But in truth, all these whites are hapless and sappy cucks to Jews.

Also, unlike White Christian American elites of old, Jews don't primarily identify as American but Jewish, i.e. they feel closer to World Jewry than to goy Americans. Thus, Jewish Power that rules the US isn't really American but Zionist and supra-nationalist. So, the American Empire serves a bigger empire, the Empire of Judea or EOJ.
And yet, because the US pretends to be a 'liberal democracy' and a protector of the 'free world', white cuck christians must pretend they are animated by 'human rights', 'democratic principles', and 'muh constitution' when, in fact, their only modus operandi is "Will it please the Jews and win me more pokemon points for being such a good cucky-wuck?" Also, as part of the so-called 'free world', the satellite nations in Asia and EU must also carry on with the pretense that they are free & independent and happily & willingly embracing globo-homo when, if anything, they are puppet-democracies where the elites have little choice but to follow the Washington Line(just like International Communism once obeyed the Moscow Line) and promote decadence, degeneracy, and 'diversity' on their own peoples. While the Jew-run US doesn't usually send in tanks like the Soviets did with Poland, Hungary, and Czechoslovakia, it has ways to destroy the reputation, stability, and marketability of any satellite nation by coordinated efforts of media and finance. Furthermore, as so many young ones in satellite nations were either educated in the US and/or brainwashed the 'Western Media', they are more than willing to collaborate with the Empire against their own nation and people.

BIDEN WHITE HOUSE CONFUSION WITH IRAN AND CHINA POLICY

Notes on "Hollywood Sold Its Soul to China … Now What?" by Christian Toto

If you want a sense of the retardation of the so-called American Right, check out this utterly moronic article about Hollywood and China.

https://www.hollywoodintoto.com/hollywood-china-box-office/

It's another case of bash-china-cuz-zio-vagina. Because white Americans are such submissive pussies to Jewish Power, they would rather vent their frustrations on China(when not Iran or Venezuela) as release valve. From Russia-Russia-Russia to China-China-China, out of the frying pan into the fire... all because neither side, 'left' or 'right', dares to speak the truth on Jewish Power. 

Whites are so fearful of and cucked to Jewish Power that it would rather blame China than Jews for the woes facing America. By the way, why should any real American Rightist care about Hollywood's problems (if indeed Hollywood is in freefall) when it is the enemy of White America? If China is playing a role in the demise of Hollywood, white patriots should be cheering(and hopefully envisioning and creating their own entertainment complex free of vile Jewish globalist influences). 

Idiocies and hypocrisies abound in the article. First, take the title: <b>Hollywood Sold Its Soul...</b> ROTFL. Since when did Hollywood have a soul? Long before the rise of China's box office and investment in Hollywood, the Jewish-run industry had already smeared white Christians, white Southerners, and conservatives countless times and promoted all sorts of degenerate filth. On the occasion when Hollywood made 'pro-conservative' or 'patriotic' movies, the villains were usually foreigners who conveniently happen to coincide as objects of hatred or indifference to Jews. Consider all the movies where Muslims were little more than terrorists foaming at the mouth. Or all those movies where gung-ho US heroes/troops were mowing down commies(usually Vietnamese) or Russkies. 

In contrast, most Hollywood 'liberal' movies feature American Conservatives or Rightists as the bad guys. And not just bad guys but irredeemable monsters who need to be exposed and destroyed without mercy. So, even as Jewish Hollywood fanned hatred against American Conservatives, American Conservatives could only hate FOREIGN enemies. Given Hollywood's long history of hostility against Conservatives, why would any American Rightist assume Hollywood had a soul to lose? And besides, Hollywood was never about art & truth but about propaganda & commerce. Granted, on occasion Hollywood did manage to produce some first-rate entertainment and even art, but the industry was mostly about crass entertainment for maximum profit and mass propaganda. If Hollywood did have a soul and lost it, it was long before the Chinese Factor entered Tinsel Town. 

Beneath the headline, the author says: Chinese films are crushing U.S. titles, leaving Tinsel Town in the financial dust

Of course, the author means INSIDE China as Chinese movies have little export value. But why is that a bad thing? Why shouldn't Chinese movies dominate the Chinese box office? Is the author some kind of cultural imperialist who believes all nations should surrender to Hollywood dominance? A true conservative believes in nationalism and sovereignty, and if Chinese movies out-compete American products in China, that is a good thing, especially as so many Hollywood products these days promote little more than decadence, degeneracy, anti-white vitriol, black megalomania, globo-homo nuttery, and culture of contempt so common among Jews. And it seems some of these Chinese movies are patriotic and heroic, which would make them conservative and nationalist within the Chinese context. Why would that be a bad thing? If anything, white people in US and EU should take some cues from China and wean themselves free of Jewish Hollywood Control. The problem isn't that China is doing something wrong, but white people in the West are. Chinese make their own products whereas whites have outsourced their creativity, dreams, and artistry to Jewish Control. Even when directors and writers are white gentiles, they are ever so mindful not to offend Jews and their favored allies, homos and blacks. 

The author, appropriately named Christian Toto, whines that Hollywood has pandered to China on the following matters in exchange for access to Chinese markets: 

Adding Chinese characters to existing stories

Shooting product placement scenes for Chinese theatrical editions

Avoiding stories that depict China in a negative light

Allowing films to be sliced and diced to appease Chinese censors

Adding Chinese characters to existing stories? Is this really a problem? How many Chinese characters have we seen in movies? At most, there might be some Asian sidekicks(often not Chinese), but Asians are far from prominent in Hollywood movies(and I'm not sure Chinese watch Hollywood movies to see Chinese people, which they can see plenty on TV and in the streets). Still, putting some Chinese in Hollywood movies actually makes sense IF it will boost box office in China. After all, Hollywood is a business, and the US abandoned nationalism in favor of globalism. Naturally, Hollywood regards the entire globe as its marketplace. It is no longer a national industry but a global one, but then this kind of 'free trade' was pushed by both Republicans and Democrats.

What makes far less sense is why there are so many Jews, homos, and blacks in movies. Why are less appealing Jews often favored over whites in prominent roles? Why are there so many homos in movies and TV, creating the impression among Americans that a whopping 25% of the population is homo? Of course, the most ludicrous casting involves blacks. Blacks are the biggest criminals and worst students in the US, but they are likely to be a heroic cop, wise judge, magical saint, or scientific genius on the big screen. And whose idea was it to promote Jungle Fever where white actresses are now routinely paired with black men, the message to white women being, "Black guys are the real men while white men are flabby maggots, so white women should abandon white dorks and go with black men. And, black men are noble of heart while white men are a bunch of closet-racists, so white women should invite Afro-colonization of their wombs and reject white 'racist' males." Jews have been pushing this line forever, but idiot cuck dorks like Christian Toto don't get it or are too cowardly to speak the truth. Notice this supposed 'anti-racism' is predicated on racial differences that says blacks are superior to whites. Jews pushed this craziness.

As for product placements, that's been around forever. True, they are annoying but hardly began with the Chinese. 

Avoiding stories that make China look bad. But again, why is this a problem? Hollywood is not about art but entertainment. Entertainment is about giving people what they want. And if Chinese now make up a big share of the box office and don't want to be insulted by Hollywood, what's wrong with that? The real problem is that white Americans take so much abuse from Hollywood but keep handing over their hard-earned money to Hollywood Jews despite all the anti-white insults. So, which people are making less sense? The Chinese who say, "We give you Hollywood Jews lots of money in box office revenue, so we ask you not to insult us as a bunch of nasty 'chinks'" or whites who say, "You Hollywood Jews piss and shi* on us and drag us through the mud and tar-and-feather us, but we will keep giving you tons of money and praise Jews & Israel to high heaven"? Which people are being retarded? 

Cuck-roach Brad Pitt in KALIFORNIA. Jewish Hollywood's portrayal of 'White Trash' subhuman.

Actually, white Americans in the past acted like Chinese today. They exerted considerable pressure on Jewish Hollywood. This is why Hollywood didn't insult the American South back then. It's why Hollywood was careful not to insult Christians and Christianity. White people said to Hollywood, "Look, we built this nation in which you Jews found freedom and made lots of money. And we make up most of the audience, so you better not shi* on us." So, Hollywood was mindful not to be brazenly anti-white. But Jews got ever bolder with their control of media, academia, and entertainment over the years and brainwashed whites to hate themselves, suck up to Jews unconditionally, cuck to blacks, bend over to homos, surrender to immigrant-invasion, and etc. 

If Chinese refuse to go down the same rabbit hole, good for them. The problem isn't with the Chinese but with whites. Whites caved to Jewish demands and grovel at the feet of Zionic Hollywood that spits on them. China is doing vis-a-vis Hollywood what whites had done in the past. It is the whites who've sold their souls to Jews, and people like Christian Toto seem resentful of the Chinese who have not. (It's like white cucks, such as John McCain and Lindsey Graham, who totally caved to Jewish Power grew resentful and secretly envious of men like Vladimir Putin who haven't. Dogs on the leash bark at dogs running free.) But instead of telling fellow whites to emulate the Chinese when dealing with Jews, Christian Toto gripes about bad bad China. His message to Jews seem to be, "We whites totally grovel before you like dogs while Chinese don't, so why do you Jews show more consideration to the Chinese than to us?" But the question answers itself. A man respects a strong horse than a jackass. China acts like a strong horse whereas White America is content to be a jackass to he Jews. No one respects the groveler, and no wonder White American jackass routinely gets kicked in the rear by Jewish Power.

Allowing China to censor and re-edit films. But EVERY nation does that. Arab nations often cut out things deemed dangerous or offensive. It's just the way of business. McDonalds in India don't sell beef. And Jewish Pressure in the US either censors, re-edits, or bans foreign works. For example, Pokemon cartoons in Japan featured Buddhist swastika symbols(which have nothing to do with Nazism) but they were excised in the US version because Jews didn't like it. Miramax, Harvey Weinstein's company, was notorious for cutting out entire chunks from foreign movies for whatever reason. Israel has its own censors. US publishing companies still hasn't released Alexander Solzhenitsyn's book about Jews and Russia. And today, Jews are the biggest censors and book-burners as they pressure Amazon and other companies not to sell certain titles that Jews find offensive. Also, Jews dominate censorship on Facebook, Youtube, Twitter, and much else. Indeed, the mere act of supporting free speech can get someone fired, blacklisted, or deplatformed. Just ask Parler. Facebook had more to do with communications behind the Jan. 6 melee in Washington D.C., but Parler got the boot, not Facebook. Jews also shut down BDS movement in many states. Jews shut down free speech through control of private enterprise and public institutions. Where are American Conservatives on this matter?

By the way, if Hollywood is such a sanctuary for artistic freedom and social truth, how come it hasn't made a single movie about the Zionist Nakba(that destroyed Palestine), Jewish role in the Brazilian Slave Trade, Jewish role in Opium Trade in China, Jewish role in Cheka & NKVD terror campaigns in the Soviet Union, Jewish role in exploiting black talent in music & sports — Spike Lee did touch on that a bit in MO' BETTER BLUES but got abused badly by Jews — , Jewish Neocon mendacity that led to the Iraq War, Jonathan Pollard's treachery in cahoots with Israel, and Israel's attack on USS Liberty? Now, what would happen to anyone who proposed such a movie in Hollywood? He'd be blacklisted and gulaged faster than any dissident in China.

Meanwhile, the Hollywood elite ignored China’s human rights violations at every turn. Celebrities railed against Georgia’s strict abortion legislation but looked the other way as China operated concentration camps for minority Muslims.

I'm sure there is mistreatment of Uighurs in China, but the sensationalist reports sound about as plausible as last yea's scare-mongering stories about Covid in China. Some are totally over-the-top. Also, whatever the Chinese are doing, it is within their own national borders. In contrast, US has illegally invaded Muslim nations and supported terrorists. What the US has done, directly or indirectly, to Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Iran, and Afghanistan is infinitely worse than anything done by China to Uighurs. I don't recall any Chinese official saying it's worth it to kill 500,000 Uighur children like Madeleine Albright said of Iraqi kids. 

Also, let's not forget that the US aided and abetted the Nakba pogroms that erased Palestine off the map. The US lends support to IDF death squads that mow down Palestinian women and children. The US looks the other way as caravans of illegal Jewish settlers march into West Bank to take the grab the remaining Palestinian territory. Israel also aided ISIS killers in Syria. 

And, US was created by mass invasion and mass 'genocide' of its indigenous population. And it was during the so-called Good War of WWII that US dispossessed over 100,000 Japanese/Americans and had them 'interned'. And US meddled in Vietnam and ended up killing over a million people. So, where do Americans get the nerve to point fingers at OTHER nations? 

In the insane year of 2020, US was a Jewish-controlled lunatic asylum where the authorities encouraged mobs of Antifa thugs and BLM scum to terrorize, attack, and rob Americans in every city and town. And now, Joe Biden, the puppet of Jews, intends to 'uighurize' all Deplorables as 'domestic terrorists'. And yet, Christian Toto, like Alex Jones and Tucker Carlson, whines about China as the source of America's woes. 

Now, China may no longer need U.S. movies to entertain its populace. The L.A. Times reports Chinese-made films dominated the country’s 2020 box office charts. The highest ranking U.S. film, “Tenet,” came in at number 11.

Well, kudos to China. White America should do the same thing. Build its own industry and make its own movies that aren't all about cucking to Negroes, bending over to Homos, caving to Trannies, and sucking up to Jews, Jews, Jews. 

White American Conservatives have long complained about Hollywood. Then, why not unite and make their own movies? Chinese did it. Could it be White America so cucked to Jews that it cannot conceive of an arts, culture, & entertainment independent of Jewish dictates? 

The (Chinese) government, eager to embrace film’s cultural soft power, is promoting patriotic fare for audiences to lap up. Compare that to U.S. studios, which routinely strip away pro-U.S. elements to appease foreign markets.

But what would be 'pro-US elements'? American Conservatives have been telling themselves that Jews are the greatest, Israel is the holiest, and all patriotic Americans should grovel before Jews, Jews, Jews as the holy Holocaust People of the Holy Book of the Holy Land of the Holy History. (Never mind Jews turned the Holy Land into Sodom and Gomorrah with massive freak show 'gay' parades.) Well, if we follow the American Conservative logic, nothing is more patriotic, American, and wonderful than sucking up to Jews who know best. Since Jews run Hollywood and say the New Americanism and New Patriotism are all about Diversity, White-Bashing, Tranny-mania, Globo-Homo, and BLM celebration, that must be the New Americanism. After all, Jews demand it, and American Conservatism says Jews Know Best. Americanism in the Current Year, according to both 'left' and 'right', is What Jews Want, or WJW.

More recently, celebrities laid low as alarming news regarding China’s lack of transparency over COVID-19 leaked out.

Right, because America is so transparent unlike China. That's why the US went to war over fake WMD in Iraq. That's why the Deep State pulled the Russia Collusion Hoax for three straight years. That's why the Deep State, medical community, big media, and various institutions(most of them directly or indirectly controlled by Jews) conspired to exploit the vastly exaggerated Covid hysteria to ensure massive fraudulent mail-in voting and recession that paved the way for Biden's win. Don't you just love the US as paragon of truth and transparency, one where 350 million people must take orders from the likes of Fauci? That must be why Edward Snowden is still in Russia and why Biden administration(filled with Jews) are going after Julian Assange hard. US loves transparency and admires whistle-blowers... unlike big bad China.

Now, I have no illusions about China and its massive corruption and political repression. But let's stop pretending that the US is a 'city on a hill' or a 'liberal democracy' governed by Rule of Law. The US is a Jewish-supremacist gangster state where the real law isn't the Constitution but "If Jews want it, they get it." 2020 was a spectacular demonstration of what Jewish Power is capable of to get the results it wants. These insane Jews didn't hesitate to ruin the economy and destroy countless livelihoods and then humiliate/punish America with George-Floyd Riots to get their way. And what did the authorities do? Even though innocent people were being attacked, they poured gasoline on black rage to discredit Trump's America. 

Meanwhile, the Hollywood elite savaged President Donald Trump’s pandemic response while praising the work of New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, whos disastrous policies likely led to thousands of unnecessary deaths. 

Finally, some truth, but it wasn't just Hollywood but all the big media and the deep state and the medical community that pushed the Big Lie. And those are controlled by whom? Eskimos? If Hollywood spread lies while the more sober institutions of media, medical industry, and the US government stood for truth and transparency, the US would indeed be a nation of Rule of Law. But Hollywood was a secondary player to the madness that was really commandeered by Deep State, Wall Street, Big Media, and Medical Community. The SERIOUS sectors of US conspired to change the outcome of the 2020 election. It was Jews, not China, but don't expect spineless cucks like Christian Toto to ever speak the truth. The likes of him will stick to bash-china-cuz-zio-vagina.

PROJECT VERITAS BANNED FROM TWITTER FOR REPORTING ON FACEBOOK VICE PRESIDENT

Transformation of Diversity Politics from Rule by Anglo-America to Rule by Judeo-America — How Jewish Power used Diversity to divide & rule over Goyim and then formulated New Terms of Goy Unity on terms favorable to Jewish Supremacism

The American Mythos of Anglo Pride

America was diverse from the beginning, predominantly Anglo but with other Northern European ethnicities, and it increasingly grew diverse as later newcomers were less Anglo or Northern European in general. There was also the large number of blacks, but they were sufficiently different to be considered and treated as a separate population, and this was even truer of the American Indians. More immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe and then finally from non-Western nations meant that the US would grow more diverse, which could also mean more divided.
Therefore, as counterbalance to the divisiveness wrought by diversity — even the American Civil War resulted from Diversity as an all-white South surely would NOT have seceded from the North; it did so because white Southerners feared the blacks and thought the whites in the North were agitating the Negroes — , the Anglo-American elites devised a formula for unity that roughly went as 'Principles for All, Pride for Us', i.e. the American Ethos would de-emphasize origin, race, ethnicity, color, religion, and etc. BUT the narrative of American Mythos would emphasize the vision, courage, foresight, ability, and wisdom of the Anglos. So, Americanism would appeal to all but reveal the Anglos as the true founders, builders, and settlers for all else for everything else to be possible. So, even as the US grew more diverse, dangers of division would be ameliorated by not only shared principles(in the Constitution) but shared respect for the Anglos as the First and Foundational Americans.

But Jews couldn't abide by that. Now, if Jews were a middling people with, say, an average IQ of 90 and possessed of a milder personality(than a pushy one with chutzpah coming out of their ears), they too would likely have abided by the Anglo Formula for Principles for All, Pride for Us(Anglos). After all, even though every non-Anglo group felt some degree of envy and resentment for the Anglos, there was more respect and admiration. It's like in the traditional Southwest, a Mexican might call an Anglo a 'damn gringo' behind his back but was ever ready to say "Si, Senor" when the Anglo boss needed the Mexican to do something, like saddle a horse in THE BIG COUNTRY. Same with the Negroes. For all their rage and loud talk, blacks on their own are like the Tataglias without the backing of Barzini in THE GODFATHER. Blacks on their own 'could never have outfought (white)Santino'. This is why blacks so eagerly pimp out to Jews. Not that they like Jews, but they know Jews place special value on blacks as bouncers and pimps.

Jews exploited the possibilities inherent in the promise of Principles-for-All in order to gain power over Anglo-Americans. Jews argued, "If the US is indeed all about equality and liberty, why was the history of America 'racist' and why was Free Speech restricted in one form or another?" Taking over the Law and Media, Jews pushed ever harder on civil liberties, especially as many Jews were radical, subversive, criminal, and/or pornographic. And under this pressure, the US did become freer than ever for awhile. Late 60s to the mid-80s were probably the golden age of Free Speech, not just in the US but in world history.

But as Jews aimed to grab more power and take over as the new ruling elites, they believed that both the politics of Pride and Principles as laid down by Anglo-America had to be altered. As long as the Pride of Narrative belonged to the Anglos, Jews would have to play a sidekick role in the American Mythos. Jews might even come to be seen as usurpers than rightful rulers.

Just like Christianity, though owing so much to Judaic tradition and Early Jews, defined itself against Jews as Christ-Killers — it was an effective way for Christians to wrest the rightful ownership of God from the Jews — , Jews felt they must villainize the white race(especially those of Northern European stock) in the American Mythos in order to conceive of a New Americanism where Jews and their allies/minions would be the true rightful owners of America.
Jesus was a Jew, but also the Son of God murdered by Jews, or so said the Christians. Gentiles took so much from Jews but blamed the Jews for the greatest crime conceivable, the killing of the Son of God. Likewise, Jews took so much from Anglo-America but felt compelled to stab its heart in order to lay claim to the New America. According to the New Jew Narrative, White Americans, despite having founded and built Early America, betrayed it like Judas betrayed Jesus: Whites talked a good talk but were really 'racist' & 'white supremacist' and crucified black jesus(though there isn't much talk of American Indians lately) while their racial brethren in Europe came to crucify the holy Jews as new christs. So, ultimately, White America is the Judas that betrayed the American Mythos, and the True Founding Fathers are the Immigrant Jews and the Blacks(and their proselytizing missionaries or missionfairies are the homos).

So, the Pride of Anglos had to be changed to Shame/Guilt of Anglos. And these emotions had to be a kind of Moral Pornography or 'Mornography', so relentless, aggressive, and overwhelming in its mind-fuc* that whites wouldn't dare stand up and say, "Wait a minute, you're going too far..." It explains why Jews promote stuff like MISSISSIPPI BURNING and 12 YEARS A SLAVE where southern whites males aren't merely flawed or bad but downright perverse & degenerate in their evil. It's beyond heroes and villains; it's about angels and monsters. So, the Pride of Anglos, which used to be a key unifying factor among diverse non-Anglo Americans went out the window. These days, the debate is about whether it's worth saving any statue or monument to Anglo-American heritage.

Now, what about the Principles? Would it still be Principles for All based on the Constitution and the Bill of Rights? Initially, Jews took full advantage as stalwart champions of this ideal to protect Jewish radicalism/subversion/pornography and also to ensure the separation of the state from any expression of Christianity. But, as Jews amassed more power for themselves and noticed that others were critically taking notice of Jewish power, Jews began to change their tune and go the neo-Bolshevik route of altering the meaning of Free Speech whereby it became 'free' only if Jews approved of it.
Likewise, when Jews talk of 'democracy', they really mean outcomes favored by the Tribe. So, if a legitimate democratic process leads to an outcome disfavored by Jews, it's 'autocracy' or 'far right'. But if Jews pull dirty tricks to subvert the democratic process but get the result they prefer, it is 'democracy'. For Jews, both the ideas of Free Speech and Democracy are about Rule of Lawyers, not Rule of Laws. Whatever Jews say is the 'truth'.
As a result, the Ideal of Principles-for-All turned into Power-for-Us, the Jews. New America is essentially about Shame for Anglos and Power for Jews. Blackness is the bludgeon Jews use against whiteness, and Queertianity is the replacement for Christianity.

Under Anglo-American rule, the problems of increasing diversity was dealt with limiting immigration mostly to whites, ending mass immigration in the 1920s, and instituting Principles for All & Pride for Anglos. And it more-or-less worked... except with the Jews, but then, this was to be expected from a people who stubbornly maintained a separate identity and culture amongst majority Christians and Muslims over the many centuries. Also, among the various newcomers, Jews alone had the combination of identity, ability, neurosis, and cunning to fully exploit American Meritocracy for their own aggrandizement and apotheosis.

Once Jews secured their place in the New Order, they concocted a grand plan of not only takeover but permanence. After all, in the game of king-of-the-hills, the king is usually pushed aside by challengers, old and new. If a people as prestigious, privileged, and powerful as the Anglo-Americans could be pushed off the hill, it could happen to Jews as well. Jews felt that, as long as the US remained a white majority nation, whites might finally come to realize Jews are a hostile/subversive bunch up to no good(not least because the better Jews, for sake of tribal, were too often hesitant to go after the bad Jews). Therefore, Jews needed to bring about even more Diversity to secure permanent power, and this time, the newcomers would be non-white.

Jews figured there would be less chance of non-whites uniting with whites against Jews than whites uniting with other whites against Jews. After all, blacks had been in the US for a long time, but white/black tensions were never resolved. Jews pushed for more immigration on account of 'Diversity' and 'Multi-Culturalism' being advantageous to Jews. And indeed, it did lead to more divisions among the goyim in the 'culture war' that took off in the late 1980s. Jews were relieved by the sight of babelization among the goyim.
But, this wasn't entirely good for Jews either. After all, if Diversity means more division among various groups insisting on their distinct identities & narratives uber alles, that meant there could be no national unity to get anything done on a domestic, let alone global, scale. For Jews to use American Power effectively, all Americans had to be united around SOME themes even if remaining divided on others.
After all, in a truly multi-cultural system, most gentile groups would ask, "Why should I praise Jews and support Zionism when I am not Jewish, and besides, what Jews are doing to the Palestinians is like what white imperialists did to my folks long ago?" A much divided America would mean the goyim wouldn't be able to unite against the Jew, BUT it also meant they couldn't unite on ANY issue as each group would be into 'our identity' and 'our interests'. Furthermore, if Multi-Culturalism really meant each group should stick to its own culture and values, most cultures(especially non-white ones) would be anti-globo-homo, something pushed by Jews. Such would be an obstacle to the Jewish Agenda.
Jews needed the goyim divided on identity & color but needed their unity on certain matters to render them useful to Jews. It's like a metallurgist uses heat to pry metals apart but then remolds them into unified solid metal. The increasingly diverse peoples had to be brought together on key issues and agendas favored by Jews. (Of course, Jews only needed to win over the elites and 'spokesmen' of every group, and such status-driven types were easy to bribe and browbeat.) And what would the terms of re-unity be for the diverse goyim in the New America with Jews as top dogs. It obviously couldn't be the old terms of Pride for Anglos and Principles for All. It had to be Shame for Anglos so that Jews and non-whites(and cuck-whites) would all be united on Blaming Whitey as the Eternal Bogeyman.
The other term was Power for Jews(than Principles for All), but it had to be veiled as the goyim might recoil from brazen Jewish Supremacism? And this is why Jews couldn't hog all the prestige for themselves and favored two other groups, Homos and Blacks to form a triumvirate. Homos of all colors(white, black, brown, yellow, etc.) would create the rainbow-impression that the New Order is about equality for people of all colors. And as the black narrative in America came to define the struggle against 'racism', blackness would have significance beyond its racial identity. MLK and Mandela are like global symbols for struggle for justice in the way that Jesus, though Jewish of origin, came to symbolize Love for All Humanity. With such elevation, of course homos and blacks were fully onboard with the Jewish Agenda... on the understanding that the two groups would pretend to be the best of friends — notice how BLM activities prominently display 'gay' colors — and either totally support Jews or at least keep mum about the crimes of Zionism & Wars for Israel. One thing for sure, whether one is Pete Buttigieg, Joe Biden, or Barack Obama, you get rewarded big time if you kiss the Jewish Behind.

The end result hasn't been Multi-Culturalism where each and every identity/interest is of equal worth and equal time but the Tri-Supremacism of Tentpole Identities(or Idolatries) of Jews, blacks, and homos. So, if you're Jewish, black, or homo, you are 'made', but if not, you must seek 'social credit' points by sucking up to one, two, or all three of the Tentpole Identities.
Indeed, for all the talk of 'white privilege', a white person who sucks up to Jewgromo(Jewish-Negro-Homo) Idolatry is favored many times over than a non-white who sympathizes with BDS, condemns the Wars for Israel, or denounces 'gay' behavior. The blondest and most-blue-eyed white person who sucks up to Jews, waves the 'gay' flag, and/or flashes a BLM sign is far more likely to succeed than the nappiest blackest black who, unlike Barack Obama and Kamala Harris, dares to condemn Israel and champions Palestinians and other brown people being crushed by Zionism and its wars.
In other words, one's own race/color ultimately matters less than which race/color one sucks up to. A white person's 'white privilege' actually expands IF he sucks up to Jews, takes the knee for the Negro, and bends over for the homo. In contrast, a non-white's supposedly magical 'diversity' means next to nothing if he or she goes against the terms set by Jews. There are many whites in the Deep State because they suck up to Jews. In contrast, Tulsi Gabbard's mixed-race identity means NOTHING because she dared to upset Jews on foreign policy. Indeed, so-called Liberal Jews much prefer white GOP cucks like Lindsey Graham and Mitch McConnell over someone like Gabbard. What does that tell you? It's the politics and 'spirituality' of group-idolatry.

Paradoxically, America's anti-class attitudes turned society into more of a neo-class system, at least with the rise of globalism. Prior to the radical expansion of 'free trade', the US had essentially a National Capitalist economy where the middle classes and working classes had considerable leverage in the economy. With the vast majority of Americans identifying as 'middle class', it seemed as if US solved the problem of class conflict after WWII and during much of the Cold War. But with hyper-globalism and China/India entering the world economy, the American Middle Class and Working Class were threatened. Also, the ebbing away of any traditional sense of Americanism and with libertarianism ensconced as the new defining value of Establishment Conservatism, the individual mattered far more than the community, and one's worth was entirely the product of personal success. Thus, successful whites were more likely to feel closer to other successful individuals regardless of race or color, especially as whites were taught to believe white identity/solidarity is 'racist' and any notion of white folk/volk is 'nazi'. So, what did this neo-individualism lead to? The rise of the new uber class for whom status-conscious membership in the club means everything whereas the unsuccessful whites are dismissed as 'losers' or 'deplorables'. In a way, the elite goy attitude toward the masses came to resemble Jewish attitude toward goyim: Contempt and derision. (Jews needed to worry less about class because the majority of Jews were very successful, and besides, pride of identity/unity wasn't verboten among Jews and, if anything, a tribal obligation that was, furthermore, cheered on by goyim who would have denounced similar consciousness among their own kind.) It's no wonder Jews encouraged the spread of libertarian individualism among whites. 'Muh liberty' negated 'Our Community' among whites. Of course, Jews, blacks, and homos were, contra the whites, totally encouraged not only to boost their own identities but demand that other groups favor Jewishness, blackness, and homo-ness over their own identities & culture. A Muslim who hollers BLM is favored over a Muslim who shouts, 'Proud to be Muslim', and a Mexican who waves the 'gay' flag is favored over a Mexican waving the Mexican flag.

Anyway, that's how the new unity works in New America. It's no longer about diverse white ethnicities and non-whites being united on Principles for All and Pride for Anglos. Rather, the pride(even holiness) is hogged by Jews, Homos, & Negroes as the Tentpole identities that the lesser multi-culti identities are pressured to rally around. As for Principles, the hell with Americans striving to live up to the promise of the Constitution. Why, that would mean equal gun rights and speech rights for all Americans. A well-armed populace might rise up against tyranny. And a free-minded people might speak truth to power, which is mostly Jewish nowadays.
So, it must be about Power than Principles. And yet, Jews understand that most people will not discard Principles in favor of Tribal Power for Jews despite their special sympathy or reverence for the Jewish people. So, even though it's really all about control, Jews have worded their power-grab in the language of principles pertaining to 'hate speech' and 'white supremacism'. (Of course, goy 'liberals' have their own reasons for supporting Speech Control. Prior to the internet and especially social networks and live-streaming, most discourse-of-consequence happened in the big media, elite academia, and institutions of the learned, or indoctrinated. So, it was mostly the educated talking amongst themselves. But the internet and live-streaming made it possible for the Average Joe to have his say on equal terms, and oddly enough, the less educated Joes sometimes had more interesting things to say because, being unattached to industry or institution, they could speak their minds in the way that elites could not, at least if they were to hold their status and positions; paradoxically, the more power you gain, the less power you have to speak freely. With all the Average Joes saying that Liberal Princelings wear no clothes, naturally the 'liberals' want to control speech for the masses. Other than that, the New Cult of Wokewicz demands that all be properly reverential to the Holy Three of Jews, Homos, and Blacks. If Jews want to control speech to protect tribal power, 'liberals' want to control speech to preserve status & prestige.) The gall, the chutzpah, of these people. It's like the notorious Jewish Harvard Professor Noel Ignatiev who rags on 'whiteness' as inherently 'racist' & 'supremacist' and must therefore be wiped out as an identity, but all of this is just projection because, if identity has been supremacist in conception and practice, it is Jewishness that says the Jewish soul, blood, and body are superior due to special blessing by the one and only God. So, Jews not only denied that other peoples have their own gods and insisted the God of the Jews is the only God for all the world and all of humanity, BUT this God made Jews better than all the rest. Jewish Supremacism is a jealous god that will simply not tolerate any other identity that has the potential of saying NO to Jewish Megalomania. This is why Jewish Power shames whiteness into paralysis so that it will serve Jewish Supremacism.

So, in summary, there was the problem of diversity that was solved under Anglo-American rule with Principles-for-All as ethos and Pride-for-Anglos as mythos.
But Jews brought about the second round of Diversity that led to yet another crisis of divisiveness. This served Jews well in having a goy populace that could not unite, but it posed the problem of each group being for itself than for any sense of common purpose. How could Jews rally the diverse goyim into serving the Jewish Agenda(as the New Americanism) if every group says 'Our Identity Uber Alles'? And so, Diversity had to be re-united under the New American themes of Sacred Semites, Noble Negroes, and Holy Homos. Therefore, whatever differences your people may have with other peoples in the US, just remember that it is the 'patriotic' duty of ALL AMERICANS to bow down before the Jews, kneel before Negroes, and cheer for homos & trannies. And spit on whitey.

WE KNOW HOW TO MAKE AMERICA STRONG - American Renaissance

The Problem with Michael Lind's Thesis of the New 'American' Elites and their Cult of D.I.E, or Diversity, Inclusion, & Equity

This is a very interesting article by Michael Lind:

The New National American Elite - America is now ruled by a single elite class rather than by local patrician smart sets competing with each other for money and power BY MICHAEL LIND - https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/new-national-american-elite

But he might have said it far more succinctly with "Jews control the gods". But then, he writes for Tablet, a Jewish journal, and that means you can't offend the gods. After all, Jews are the god-makers in the US.

All this wokeness comes down to Jews rigging the game to elevate their own status and power. Lind mentions Episcopalians and Hindus as among the very rich, but the fact is it's the Jews, NOT Episcopalians and Hindus, who control the gods. That makes all the difference. This means a Jewish pundit who makes $200,000 a year has more power than Jeff Bezos or Bill Gates with their many billions. As long as Jews control the gods, Jews lead, goyim follow. Twitter is run by Jack Dorsey a goy but works under pressure from Zionist ADL and Jewish-heavy SPLC. To understand the concept of Jews controlling the gods, consider the following:

Jews who control the gods control Big Tech and Corpocracy that attack Trump and Populism — The Need for the INNER-WARRIOR among white patriots - https://dailyandreaostrov.blogspot.com/2021/01/jews-who-control-gods-control-big-tech.html

The Dark Ramifications of Jews Controlling the Gods — Control of the Gods leads to Control of All Money & Power — Why Jews Have the Power to Control the Gods - https://dailyandreaostrov.blogspot.com/2021/01/the-dark-ramifications-of-jews.html

There's been much talk of rising Chinese Power, and China may be seen as a new strong horse in world affairs, but what is the difference between Jewish Power and Chinese influence in the West? Jews control the gods, Chinese don't. Jews got both the strong horse and sacred cow whereas Chinese only got the strong horse:

Jewish Power Strategy contra Chinese Power Strategy — The Jewish Advantage of Using both the STRONG HORSE and the SACRED COW — US Dollar Supremacy in Money and Jewgromo Shekel Supremacy in Morality - https://dailyandreaostrov.blogspot.com/2020/12/jewish-power-strategy-contra-chinese.html

With Some Self-Awareness, White Americans Would Realize that Chinese Work with Jews to Undermine the West Because Whites Have Been Doing Exactly the Same Thing — White Complicity in the Jewish Destruction of Christian West — Why the Control of Northern Europeans Is Key to Jewish Global Dominance - https://dailyandreaostrov.blogspot.com/2020/12/with-some-self-awareness-white.html

And why did 'gay rights' turn into Gay Rites, a replacement for Christianity? It was a Jewish Plan.

As stated here: Ron Paul style Libertarianism is Useless against Globalist Gangster Fascism of the Deep State & Big Industry, both of which worship the Gods controlled by Jewish Power — Only Solution against Globo-Homo Gangster Fascism is the National-Humanist Neo-Fascism of the Patriots - https://dailyandreaostrov.blogspot.com/2021/01/ron-paul-style-libertarianism-is.html

We see this in the apotheosis of the tranny. Now, did most women want this? Did they want to take a backseat to a bunch of freako men pretending to be ‘women’? No. It was Jews who wanted it. Why? Jews seek to suppress any notion of majority identity and pride. Among womenfolk, real women are more than 99% whereas tranny faux-women count for less than 1%. And yet, women now must make way for trannies as champions of female sports. Why? Jews see tranny power/privilege as analogous to Jewish power/privilege. In both cases, it’s the minority-elite dictating and dominating over the vast majority. When the great majority of goyim let themselves fall under Jewish Power, stuff like globo-homo and transmania were almost inevitable as furtherance of Jewish Power Strategy. Jews see it as cultural rhyming: Jewish minority elite power rhymes with tranny minority elite power.

Of course, homos/trannies are also useful to Jews because, while not every nation has Jews, every nation has its share of homos and trannies who tend to be alienated from their own society and therefore willing to work with Jewish Globalists who shower them with special favors and privileges.

Indeed, why is it that all this talk of 'diversity, equity, and inclusion' never apply to Jews? Jews control the media & academia and inundate us with mantras about diversity, blah blah, equity, blah blah, and inclusion blah blah. But, the very Jews who push mass immigration into gentile nations insist on Jewish-only immigration to Israel. While Jews try to make nations like Hungary and Polish less Hungarian and less Polish, they try to make Israel more Jewish by accepting only Jewish immigrants and encouraging natalism among Jewish women.

Also, if diversity matters, then shouldn't proportionality as well? Jews are 2% of the US population but control 95% of all media. Jews control all of Big Tech directly or indirectly. They directly control Google and Facebook and indirectly control Amazon and Twitter because Jews control the gods or what is holy. So, Jews can pressure Bezos and Dorsey to suppress certain voices as 'heretical'. So, books and tweets for white identity and interests are banned BUT there is no banning of Zionist supremacism, Jewish arrogance, and Jewish lies. Amazon sells books that tell complete lies about the founding of Israel. Books into Nakba Denial are never censored. Zionists who support IDF death squads who mow down children in Gaza and promote apartheid policies in the West Bank are not censored. If anything, they are celebrated. Sheldon Adelson once called for nuking Iran, a nation with no nukes, but he was allowed to be the main donor to the GOP. Incredible. And Jewish-run Hollywood has made tons of movies that depict Muslims as hairy terrorist but not a single movie about the Nakba, not a single movie about Jewish role in Bolshevik terror, not a single movie about Jewish role in selling opium to the Chinese, and not a single movie about Jewish role in Atlantic Slave Trade to Brazil. Brazil imported 10x the number of slaves as the US, and Jews played a big role in the slavery. Madeleine Albright said it's worth it to murder half a million Arab children, but she's a celebrated figure. It's as if Jews are above the law. So says Philip Giraldi: 

Trump's Unpardonable Pardons - Another disgraceful performance from “Israel’s president” by PHILIP GIRALDI

And despite all this talk of 'equity', has the NYT ever hired a Palestinian-American columnist to give his or her side of story? No, NYT columnists are heavily Jewish-Zionist who support the Nakba pogroms that erased Palestine off the World Map. Or the columnists are browbeaten goyim who dare not rock the boat and name Jewish Power out of fear of being blacklisted as an 'Anti-Semite'.
And no one complains that there are TOO MANY JEWS or that Jews are over-represented in any area. No, the complaint is always about too many whites(or too many Asians). So, the issue of 'equity' is NOT really about equity for all but complaints about how certain FAVORED GROUPS are not well-represented in certain areas. As Jews are favored, it's never a problem that they dominate media, Hollywood, state department, finance, and etc. Look at Biden's government. It's 66% Jews at the top, but no one complains. There can never be TOO MANY JEWS. Indeed, when Rick Sanchez said Jews control CNN, he got fired for speaking the truth. Also, it's never a problem when blacks are over-represented. Who complains that NBA and NFL aren't diverse enough? Most basketball stars are black. The great majority of footballers are black. Any many pop singers are black. But no one complains, and, if anything, black prominence is always a cause of celebration. Indeed, if blacks were over-represented at Silicon Valley or elite NY high schools by a huge margin, would anyone complain? NO. Blacks, like Jews, are considered sacred. So, the notion of 'too many blacks' can never be a problem. And 'too many Jews' is always a good thing. We've heard so many complaints about Not Enough Black Quarterbacks, but we never hear complaints about NO white, yellow, or brown running backs in the NFL. It's perfectly fine for blacks to hog entire positions in sports.

The problem is only 'too many whites' and 'too many Asians'(though this is usually chocked up as 'too many whites', i.e. Asians count as 'honorary whites' in the Jewish-run order). Homos are also favored. Homos dominate fashion at the expense of women. Partly, it's because many homos have talent in that area, but another reason is homos act as an insular mafia. Also, homos are vastly over-represented in key fields, even in bastion of power. Washington D.C. is 10% homo, and homos are found at all levels of the Deep State and work as agents of US Imperialism and Jewish Supremacism. But no one bitches about 'too many homos' because homos are favored. Jews control the gods, and it's always a blessing for Jews, blacks, and homos to have all the power, money, and prestige they can get.

Also, why do Jews, blacks, and homos get the most sympathy in the discourse? The greatest crime of the US was genocide of the Indians. The Jewish Holocaust didn't happen in the US. It happened in Europe, but there is a Holocaust Museum in the DC mall but no American Indian holocaust museum. Blacks suffered slavery, but surely genocide is far worse than slavery. Besides, blacks still own their ancestral lands in Africa. Africa is black. In contrast, the American Indians not only suffered genocide but lost their ancestral lands forever to invasive masses from the Old World. Mass Immigration wiped out the American Indians, just like Mass Immigration of Jews wiped out Palestine.
Let's face it. Mass Immigration = Genocide. It's bad enough American Indians lost their lands to whites, but now they must lose it to the entire world in the name of Open Borders. Is that what 'inclusion' is about? Well, Palestine allowed 'inclusion' of some Jews in the 19th century, but how did that turn out? More and more Jews arrived until they replaced the Palestinians who now live under apartheid.

Jews claim to be 'liberal', but how come both Democratic Jews and Republican Jews support the anti-Constitutional suppression of BDS, a movement calling calls for equal justice for Palestinians? For sure, Michael Lind won't be writing about the hypocrisy in Tablet because his media presence depends on sucking up to Jews.

As for Diversity, if it's so great as a panacea for all problems, why doesn't Israel adopt an Open Borders policy and take in tons of Chinese, Hindus, and Africans? By the way, isn't Diversity the product of imperialism? Why is Latin America diverse? It used to be homogeneously brown. It became diverse with the white Spanish and Portuguese invasions. And it was made further diverse by the slave trade that brought over millions of blacks(without the approval of the brown natives who lost their power of say). Now, is that something to celebrate? Mass invasion, mass genocide, mass rape, and slavery? The brown natives of South America didn't ask to be invaded. They didn't ask their lands be made diverse via imperialism and slave trade. Now, what is the result of this diversity? White Hispanics and Jews are at the top of the totem pole in so-called Latin America. You got mixed-raced mestizos in the middle , and you got brown natives and blacks on the bottom. Wow, something to celebrate!
Or, look at Hawaii. It was once entirely Hawaiian. But it was made diverse by white invasion. And then, white invaders allowed massive Asian immigration. As the result, the native Hawaiians are now only 12% of the population in their ancestral homelands. Sounds to me like cultural genocide, but we are told it's something to celebrate. "Hey, you native Hawaiian, why don't you celebrate the demise of your people and culture in favor of white invaders and Asian collaborationist immigrants?" Sounds cruel if you ask me.

Btw, why is it even called 'Latin America'? The indigenous folks have been living in the southern continent for over 20,000 yrs, whereas the white Latino invaders have been there for only 500 yrs. And yet, it's called Latin America. Why must indigenous identity and culture take a backseat to the identity of Latin European invaders?

‘Latino’ or ‘Latinx’ is an Insult to the True Identity of the Indigenous Peoples of what is called ‘Latin America’ — Indigeneity of the Original Peoples was destroyed by the Diversity brought forth by Spanish and Portuguese Imperialists who furthered Diversity with Massive Influxes of African Slaves — Diversity conquered and raped Indigeneity - https://dailyandreaostrov.blogspot.com/2018/12/latino-or-latinx-is-insult-to-true.html 

Finally, the notion of inclusion is problematic. What does it mean? Does it mean every nation should adopt Open Borders and accept outsiders? But look at the fate of Tibet. It is forced to include the influx of Han Chinese. There are 1.5 million Tibetans and 1.2 billion Han Chinese. The policy of 'inclusion' is leading to the erasure of Tibet as a distinct people and culture. People denounce nativism but is invasivism any better? Indeed, the story of organisms has been one between nativism vs invasivism. Americans of all people should know this. American Indians were nativists who fought to protect their lands from invasivist European settlers. Nativism lost to Invasivism. Over time, the white settlers became the new nativists who put down roots in American soil. But with open borders, they will be replaced like the Indians. Look at California that, in a few decades, went from a solid white majority state to white minority state. 

Jews understand this. This is why they are totally nativist in Israel while pushing invasivism on goy nations. Jews want goy nations to be filled up with diversity so that Jews can play divide-and-rule among the divided populations. Jews do this in the US. Jews make anti-Muslim movies and show them to white Christians and tell them, "Join the military, go to the Middle East, and blow away those raghead muzzies", and then Jews bring Muslims here and put their arms around them and say, "We Jews and you Muslims are allies against those eeeeeeevil white supremacists." What a dirty game these Zionists play.

Nativism is the Flip-side of Invasivism — It's the Way of All Organisms - https://dailyandreaostrov.blogspot.com/2018/10/nativism-is-flip-side-of-invavisism-its.html

Also, inclusion can lead to exclusion. Why? Because various groups have different talents. Allowing blacks into sports has led to exclusion of non-blacks. Because blacks are better natural athletes, allowing them into the game means others don't get to play. All running backs are black. All 100 m sprint finalists are black. The French soccer team is largely black. Many sports teams might as well put up a sign: "Non-Blacks Need Not Apply". Los Angele is very diverse with lots of browns and yellows, but the sports teams are almost all black.

And letting trannies into women's sports means that women will be excluded from winning because men-pretending-to-be-women are bigger and stronger. And allowing smarter Jews into America has led to Jewish takeover and domination of so many elite institutions. And with their power, Jews exclude who poses a challenge to Jewish interest. If you support BDS, forget about it. You won't work for Wall Street, State Department, NYT, or Hollywood. If a film director shows interest in making a movie about Nakba, he will be blacklisted 100x worse than Dalton Trumbo and other communists in the 50s.

And notice how Jews use globo-homo to push Zionist supremacism. Jews made globo-homo holy in Western hearts and minds. Then, Jews tell the West, "Look, Israel has big homo parades whereas Muslims are hostile to homos." As Western folks are now so into globo-homo, they will support Zionist oppression of Palestinians on that count: Israel celebrates homos and trannies.

In the past, Western Imperialism sugarcoated its wars and invasions with missionary tales of spreading the Christian Faith. So, the invasions and exploitations were morally justified under the cover of Christian sanctimony. Today, the decadent West that is brainwashed by Jewish control of media/academia is into worship of 'rainbow' sodomy as the highest value. So, the deep state merely need to paint the Bomb gay to win the support of the so-called 'progressives'. Instead of 'onward Christian soldiers', it's 'onward homo soldiers'. 

Indeed, what is the new cold war with Russia about? Russia doesn't allow massive homo parades in the Red Square. Russians consider the grounds sacred. Annually, they remember the sacrifice of 25 million who died in defense of the Motherland against the German Wehrmacht. But Jews seek to desecrate the holy ground with parades where vain homos and trannies strut around with dildos. And yet, American 'progressives' are now so into globo-homo idolatry that they see Russia as the evil nation and support the new cold war.

What a stupid world.