The Militarism Canard... or the 'Civilian' Actors Have Been More Dangerous

 

One thing for sure, one needn’t be of the military to be militarist as, often is the case in the West, the civilian leadership(or puppetry of the oligarchy) tend to be more militarist, whereas a considerable number of military men often warn against excess adventurism. It goes against the grain of the popular narrative(via academia and mass media/entertainment) that the warmongers are embedded in the military. How often have we heard about the role of Japanese MILITARISM in the series of impossible wars that brought death and destruction upon mainland Asia and finally upon Japan itself?
The early Cold War Narrative often pits relative peace-seekers like John F. Kennedy against the War State, which some have suspected in the assassination of the former. Films like FAIL SAFE, DR. STRANGELOVE, and SEVEN DAYS IN MAY have military men plotting to bring about World War III in the name of defeating communism. And of course, the great bogeymen of World War I(or the Great War) have long been the German MILITARISTS.

But, some of the biggest warmongers have been in the civilian sectors of government, business(like William Randolph Hearst who beat the drums for what came to be the Spanish-American War), and the intellectual class(later to set up their various think-tanks). Most Jewish-Zionist Neocons, including women like Victoria Nuland the Cookie Monster of Maidan, never served a day in the military. (Tulsi Gabbard did and is less enthused for endless wars.) The near-epithet of ‘isolationism’ was cooked up by the intellectual class to shame and/or purge those calling against aggression or conflict via interfering in foreign affairs. Oftentimes, it was the civilian types blaming the military types for an unwillingness to engage the world in a warlike manner.

The Jewish, as well as the homo, angle is rather interesting in the phenomenon of civilian-militarism, or ‘civilitarism’. Many peoples/cultures throughout history have been depicted as warlike: Macedonians, Romans, Germanics, Mongols, the Turks, and etc. But not the Jews, renowned more for spiritual pursuits and aptitude for business. Of course, one could argue that the art of prophecy, of which Jews became masters, is a kind of spiritual declaration of war on the souls of humanity, its modern variant being the radical-secular ideology, such as Marxism that inevitably instigated wars and counter-wars.
In a sense, Jesus and Muhammad were the biggest warmongers of history even if by accident. So many wars in their name. And of course, one could argue that business, driven by ruthless competition, fuels aggression and expansion that could opt to resolve matters by war, or war as a continuation of business by other means.

At any rate, we’ve often been fed the impression that Jews, who tend to be cerebral, found themselves surrounded by warlike goyim. Even Robert Oppenheimer, the father of the atomic bomb, has been characterized as a man of peace at odds with the militarists who want to blow up the world.
To be sure, there’s been the figure of the Jewish radical or revolutionary, one committed to violent means, but the distinction(convincing or not) is nevertheless made in his favor as someone who uses violence as a means of idealism, whereas militarists supposedly love war for war’s sake(as in the case of PATTON the movie). Revolutionaries supposedly fight wars to save the world, whereas militarists fight wars to beat the world up.
In lobbing bombs, anarchists believed themselves to be working for justice/peace, i.e. the institutions are oppressive and tyrannical, and one must dismantle their structures to bring forth a world of everlasting peace and justice.

Of course, the revolutionary is the inheritor of the prophetic mindset, what E. Michael Jones calls the ‘Jewish Revolutionary Mindset’, and it has obscured the warlike nature of the Jewish Way. No matter how many bodies pile up, the Jewish narrative speaks of ‘tikkun olam’ or ‘healing the world’. Some trace the warmongering of the Neocons to their Trotskyite origins, and perhaps there is something to that, but given the near-universal support of the Wars for Zion among the entire spectrum of Jewish elites from the Democratic Party to the Republican Party, the Trotskyite origins are probably more a footnote than the main thesis of the Jewish Worldview.

A key difference between the Jewish radicals/revolutionaries of old and the Jewish-Zionists Neocons/Neolibs of today is that a good many of the former were willing to join in the fight. They were true believers in the new prophecy(such as Marxism), for which they were willing to give their lives. It was a redeeming facet to their fanaticism, whereas the current hegemonists of World Jewry have no concept of the Good other than Jewish Supremacist Power, i.e. they are too good to expend their own precious lives.
As such, they prefer to expend any number of subhuman inferior goy lives to realize their own agendas. What do Zelensky of Ukraine and Netanyahu of Israel have in common? Their reckless provocations seek to draw the US into a wider war. Make goyim fight goyim. Make Slav fight Slav, make Western Europeans fight Eastern Europeans, make American goyim fight Russian goyim. And Netanyahu’s wet dream is to make the US take on Iran and the rest loathed by Israel.

Even the sheen of Jewish warrior spirit and courage has gone from Zionism. One appeal of Zionism to the Jewish(and sympathetic goy) imagination was that, unlike the stereotypical Jew of yesteryear who cowered before their tormentors(and were herded into trains to the camps during World War II), the founders and defenders of Israel stood firm and fight like lions and hyenas, the mythos behind EXODUS the novel and movie. The Six Day War narrative had little Israel besieged by hostile Arabs preparing for The Holocaust the Next Chapter, but proud and heroic Israeli Davids, all on their own, smote the Arab Goliaths in a mere six days. Jews sure could take care of their own!

But with the grueling quagmire in Gaza and given that Israel’s neighbors aren’t quite the pushovers they used to be, Zionism is less about Jewish Spartanism that Smartanism, or how to cleverly manipulate the US to enter the war and fight Israel’s enemies so that precious Jewish lives don’t have to be sacrificed.
Amusingly enough, Jewish feelings about whites aren’t all that different from their feelings about the Palestinians — they are all inferior subhuman goyim — , but various goyim are under the delusion of being favored by the Jews, the rightful master race. It’s like a bunch of dogs believing that they will be spared and rewarded if they serve the Asian master who kills and eats dogs; it doesn’t occur to them that THEY may be the next in the pot. So, even though Jews did the Palestinian Nakba and are now pushing White Nakba, white shabbos goy dogs hope and pray that Jews will spare and reward them as the ‘good dogs’ if they bark and bite at the ‘bad dogs’. But even Palestinians like Rashida Tlaib could be so deluded. She denounces what the Jews are doing to her people but earlier played cheerleader to the Jewish War on Russia via Ukraine as proxy.

Of course, some will say that the stereotype of the passive Jew who got beaten up by bullies(before Zionism revived the warrior spirit of the Israelites) has been something of a stretch. Passive Jew? Jews have long been known for being ‘pushy’, hardly a passive trait. And the criminal world has been filled with ‘Tough Jews’ in both Europe and the US. And Bolshevik Jews, before Zionism became a thing, amply demonstrated how blood-curdling they could be. Even though the Jewish schlemiel-weakling isn’t as fantastic as the Noble Magic Negro, it too has been something of a false stereotype that lend the dubious impression of Jews being hapless victims or nincompoops in tight spots.

Video Link

Given the reality of Jewish life and history, it’s hardly surprising that the Jewish ‘civilian’ sector is rife with aggressive tendencies, the kind that may lead the world to Chutzpacalypse Now. Besides, if perceptions and passions precede action, the vitriol that often spews forth from the Jewish community against white goyim, Christians, Russians, Iranians, Palestinians, and now even the Chinese is a sure sign that much of Jewishness is a raging cauldron of arrogance, fear, resentment, and paranoia. Many Jews relished in ‘Punch a Nazi’ and ‘Trump is Literally Hitler’ antics that often led to violence, culminating in Antifa and BLM wrecking entire parts of cities in 2020, though in the case of Ukraine, Jewish violence opted for ‘Hug a Nazi’, if only to hurl the ‘Nazis’ at the Russkies.

Outwardly, homos also come across as unlikely warmongers. The common image of a thug, bully, or warrior is that of an alpha male tough guy, like Colonel Kilgore(Robert Duvall) in APOCALYPSE NOW. Arnold Schwarzenegger in CONAN THE BARBARIAN was no pansy fairy but a testosterone-filled slayer of men and humper of women. Homos have often been portrayed as victims of macho-man bullies and ‘God Hates Fags’ patriarchal types.
In truth, homos tend to be vain, and vanity seeks privilege, a domain of power, and the nature of power is aggressive, expansive, and coercive. Once a part of the power elite and/or the deep state, homos have sought to impose their neo-aristocratic will on everyone else, out of revenge if not haughty delight.
It is then hardly surprising that the US deep state, run by Jews and homos as the top elites, has become even more warlike than in the days of the ‘hawkish right-wingers’, the types who overestimated or exaggerated the Red Menace but nevertheless regarded it as a genuine threat, whereas the current pro-war mania merely and cynically invokes ‘muh democracy’ as a cover for an agenda that is entirely ethno-supremacist and homo-hegemonic, as if the entire global economy must be dictated by Jewish bankers and all the world’s institutions, secular and spiritual, must hoist the ‘gay’ banner.
The quasi-aristocratic homos sneer at the straight world as the peasantry that must bow down to the superior tooty-toots. Like Tim Roth’s feline character in ROB ROY who loves to cut down the lower-class dogs.

Video Link

Though true that plenty of gung-ho types in the military rattle their sabers at perceived enemies while plenty of peacenik types in civil society chafe at overseas(or neo-imperialist) ventures, the fact remains that, by and large, the most adventurist and reckless figures driving the world to the edge(of even Nuclear Armageddon) tend to be in the ‘civilian’ sectors whereas the military brass generally harbors a sober and cautionary attitude on foreign policy, if only because they feel responsible for their men.
It’s the reverse of developments in Japan in the 1930s when the civilian government’s attempts at diplomacy went undermined by the military that was hellbent on war as the only solution.
The so-called Greens in Germany, once associated with the Peace Movement, are now among the most vociferous beaters of war drums even at the risk of World War III with Russia(and its partners).

At the very least, many American civilian-leaders in the past had served in the military(and even participated in war) and had few illusions about what it was about. Even those who hadn’t chosen military careers had direct experience of violence. John F. Kennedy suffered from pain all his life. Dwight Eisenhower as President, head of the civilian government, grew increasingly anxious about where the Cold War may lead, as World War III could involve nuclear weapons.

In contrast, most civilian hotheads today have no military experience, and this could be said of most of their family members, friends, and associates as well. As such, they tend to see military men as pawns and toys than as fellow comrades, the kind of people with whom one once rubbed shoulders.
Furthermore, there’s an ethnic component to the civilian-military dynamic in the current order. The Jewish-Zionist-Supremacist types who dominate the civilian government tend to see goyim as expendable, less than fully human. It’s no wonder that they are so blasé about casualties, military and civilian, in wars in the Middle East, North Africa, and Ukraine, or about the victims of US-led sanctions, like the 500,000 Iraqi children whose deaths Madeleine Albright deemed as ‘worth it’; indeed, even when Jews carry out wholesale massacres in Gaza and spread terror throughout the region, the main narrative from the Jewish-controlled media is “What can be done to protect Israel?”
But then, Jews, who tirelessly heap abuse on whites, Christians, Muslims, Russians, Iranians, Chinese, Venezuelans, Hungarians, and etc. and defame entire nations & cultures, are the first ones to bitch about ‘antisemitism’ and how they need ‘protected group’ status despite constituting the most powerful and destructive force in the world.

As for cuck-minded goy maggots like John Bolton and Lindsey Graham, they crave approval and plaudits from Jews as their masters and bark like attack dogs. (Given the pathetic nature of so many goyim, Jewish supremacist attitudes are understandable to a degree. If all those around you acted like lap dogs vying for your approval at every moment, would you respect them?)

The so-called civilian ‘democratic’ regimes of the West demonstrate that militarism can thrive outside the military as a mindset of excessive confidence and arrogance of force. The Neocon/Neolib administrations are totally militarist, far more so than the average officer in the Army or Navy.
The Iraq War was the brainstorm of the civilian government led by George W. Bush and Dick Cheney who figured that the surest way to increase Jewish allegiance to the GOP was by giving Zion the war it wanted, especially with ‘liberal’ Jews in the media also hankering for the so-called War-on-Terror.
Needless to say, Jewish Power played it smart. It got the war it wanted while also criticizing Dubya as a reckless cowboy, useful as plausible deniability. The New York Times pushed for the Iraq War, but when it went badly, claimed to have been duped by Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld.

While the German militarists have been named as the chief culprits of the First World War, the conflict was as eagerly embraced by the civilian sectors of society. And the civilian government in France had been itching for war, if only to avenge the defeat at the hands of Bismarck. At the very least, the Germans, militarists and civilian authorities alike, believed that the war was a matter of survival or national integrity as Germany was squeezed between vengeful France and increasingly hostile Russia. They regarded it as much a war of defense as of offense(as the best defense). The most gratuitous and unnecessary participant in the war was Great Britain, ruled by a civilian government, with which Germans sought no conflict.
Even in the Pacific War, the Asian sphere of World War II, it is too simplistic to lay all the blame on the Japanese militarists as evidence suggests that the civilian FDR administration was trying to bait Japan(and Germany) into war. And near the end of the war, prominent military figures like Dwight Eisenhower and Douglas MacArthur detested the use of the atomic bomb, the decision of Harry Truman, the civilian head as commander-in-chief.

The myth of Camelot(of John F. Kennedy), which stems in part from the Cuban Missile Crisis and America’s involvement in Vietnam, usually pits the idealistic Peace Corp president against the right-wing military generals or the military-industrial-complex as the bogeyman(while blithely overlooking the fact that Eisenhower had originally meant to call it the ‘military-industrial-congressional complex’ to highlight the civilian aspect of the beast — today, more fearsome is the Military-Intellectual Complex whereby Jews cook up the ideas and agendas to be executed by goyim-golem in the military). Liberal opinion at the time was of the mind that, but for Kennedy, the world would have been embroiled in World War III and with nukes. This tough guy attitude that talk is weak, diplomacy is delusional, and only overwhelming force will thwart the enemy was seen as dangerous, even pathological. But then, the Liberals set the template in the late 1930s and early 1940s that war and only war could resolve the issues with Germany, Japan, and Italy, and the right-wing Cold War mentality was essentially a continuation of war-only mindset.

General Jack D. Ripper of DR. STRANGELOVE is a precursor of ‘Dirty’ Harry Callahan but at the global level: Diplomacy, like legal process, is for ‘liberal’ wimps, and it is time to grab the gun and pull the trigger. Again, the anti-militarist satire is rather ironic as the very people(of Liberal persuasion) who denigrated the hardcore Cold Warriors as paranoid and psychotic had been the ones who’d insisted on the absolute and total destruction of the enemies in the buildup to and during World War II. Anyone calling for peaceful solutions were tarred as ‘unpatriotic’. And figures like Oppenheimer were hellbent on speeding up atomic research in order to turn German cities into ashes. (And the Liberals, Jews and Goyim, hardly opposed the theft of US nuclear secrets by Israel that ignored or violated all international rules and norms and even cooked up scenarios like the Samson Option. If anything, ‘liberal’ and ‘conservative’ Jews alike have demanded that American politicians of all stripes stand behind Israel no matter how bellicose its foreign policy.) Today, the supposed heirs of this ‘no appeasement’ school invariably denounce any diplomatic solution in conflicts involving Russia, Iran, and increasingly China.

While there were hardliners in the military, especially in the early part of the Cold War, the kind who even pressed for first-strike on Russia, hawks were also to be found among civilian ideologues, and it wasn’t just the likes of Barry Goldwater. Indeed, the gloom-and-doom specter of the right-wing demagogue often masked the warlike nature of the entire spectrum of American Politics. LBJ appealed to voters as the Peace Candidate contra the madman Goldwater, but he was the one who escalated the war in Vietnam. (In our time, voters were warned that Trump was too unstable and dangerous on the world stage, but it was the Jewish-heavy administration of Joe Biden that unleashed new wars. As long as the ‘right-wing demagogue’ trope remains potent in political discourse, the actual warmongers can evade responsibility by pulling the alarm on the ‘far-right’ or ‘fascist’ threat. They pose as counter-bullies to the right-wing bullies, domestic and foreign, in the name of ‘democracy’ or whatever, even though they are now the most hegemonic bullies in the world.)

Many military men, having witnessed the horrors firsthand in the Second World War, have advised against aggressive actions in the Cold War. In US history, generals who became presidents — George Washington, Ulysses Grant, and Dwight Eisenhower — tended to be sober-minded on matters related to war. Indeed, America’s involvement in the bloodiest wars — The Civil War, World War I, World War II, Korean War, Vietnam War, and Iraq War — owed to presidents whose closest advisers were ideologues or businessmen.

The ‘industrial’, as well as the intellectual/ideological, feature of the military-industrial complex was far more decisive in the formulation of agenda. Regarding the current bloodbath in Ukraine, the most enthusiastic cheerleaders for more death and destruction are in the civilian sectors than in the US military. The business elements are ecstatic about profits, and the intellectual/ideological(mostly Zionist) elements are fanatical in their dream of conquest of Russia as the final trophy in the hegemonic design of World Jewry.

While Oliver Stone’s revisionist film JFK shows Lyndon B. Johnson being prodded into escalation in Vietnam by military types, the real drivers of policy were the so-called ‘The Best and the Brightest’, the know-it-all mandarins with their high concept of ‘defending’ the Free World.
Films like DR. STRANGELOVE, SEVEN DAYS IN MAY, and FAIL SAFE propped up the useful scapegoat of the US military when, in fact, the bigger danger lay in the civilian sector.
For sure, it was the rising prominence of Jewish strategists of varying worldviews, which more or less converged on ‘neoconservatism'(or Nulandism), that would turn the US into a full-blown imperialist power that has simultaneously managed to frighten and alienate much of the world. Ironically, most of these saber-rattlers never served in the military or even fired a gun.
The Ukraine catastrophe and the looming disaster in Taiwan are the brainchild of civilian ideologues and think-tankers or political shills. Whether it’s Nancy Pelosi visiting globo-homo Taiwan to provoke China or Lindsey Graham accompanying the likes of Victoria Nuland to Ukraine, civilian rule hasn’t ruled out militarism.

In retrospect, 20th Century Wars weren’t generally the conflagrations started by militarists. The most notable militarist-led disaster was Japan’s ventures in mainland Asia and eventual clash with the US, and it may have owed to Japanese militarism being rooted in Japanese culture and ethos going back to the samurai. Even after modern Japan abolished the samurai caste, the vision of the military as the true embodiment of the spirit and honor of Japan remained, thus fueling a ‘sacred’ sense of mission absent in most militaries(premised on professionalism) around the world.
Otherwise, however, military men were often the peace-makers or at least peace-keepers. Kemal Ataturk of modern Turkey had no ambitions beyond the national. Franco, upon victory in the Spanish Civil War, was careful not to become entangled in alliances that might drag Spain into a larger conflict. Ultimately, Charles De Gaulle ended the bloody war in Algeria. Generally, it appears those who’d held higher ranks were more judicious than those who’d held lower ranks. Hitler, after all, was only a corporal.

Fascists have often been confused with the military, not least because fascist leaders donned military gear. Benito Mussolini and Adolf Hitler dressed and acted the part of military commanders. Actually, both came into their own as intellectuals, ideologues, and activists.
Unlike most military men who specialize in tactics and logistics(and are thereby acutely aware of the limits of power based on availability of men and material), the intellectual/ideologue types tend to base their worldview on Big Ideas or the ‘vision’ thing.

Perhaps, fascists are the only people who’ve been demeaned and scapegoated more than the military for the wars and destruction of the late modern era. While the militarists(usually depicted as military men though anyone can qualify) have often been impugned as thick-skulled and overly blunt in their approach to foreign affairs, they weren’t necessarily depicted as sadistic, cruel, and/or evil. Not knowing any better, they’re prone to solving crises with violence and aggression. In their lack of ideas(and even brains), they may be childish and stupid in their violence-first or violence-only approach, but at least they aren’t inspired by Evil Ideas.

In contrast, fascists are reviled as people of ideas, all bad. Such a characterization is somewhat understandable given the romanticism of war by certain Italian Fascists and Hitler’s brutalist vision of the world, humanity and history locked in a constant flux of struggle and violence.
Still, fascist-bashing is usually a form of scapegoating by dumping the blame of history on the fascists when, in fact, capitalists, communists, liberals, and etc. have hardly been amateurs in war and aggression. FDR was the true father of the military-industrial-congressional complex. Winston Churchill plunged the British Empire into a war it could easily have avoided. While Josef Stalin and Fidel Castro were generally cautious, figures like Leon Trotsky and Che Guevara were globe-trotting revolutionaries committed to stoking conflict wherever and whenever. Communism, even more than fascism, blurred the lines between revolution and war, between civilian and military.

Not only have the fascists been blamed for virtually everything, but even when non-fascists have resorted to aggression and violence in politics, they were smeared as ‘fascist’, thus placing the blame on ‘fascism’ than on the actual parties involved. It’s like Christians blaming Satan for everything that goes wrong, thereby absolving themselves and their religion for the failings, i.e. even when they did it, the ‘devil’ either did it or made them do it.
So, when Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump did the bidding of Jewish Neocons, they were often condemned as ‘fascists’ when, in fact, their policies were the logical extension of Western capitalism, decadent liberalism, corrupt conservatism, and ethnic nepotism(of the Jews).

By calling one another ‘fascist’, both the ‘liberals’ and ‘conservatives’ can go on pretending that they themselves aren’t the problem, which supposedly lies with ‘fascism’. So, Clinton the Democrat wasn’t really responsible. It was Clinton the closet-fascist. Or Bush the closet-fascist. Or Obama or Trump the closet-fascist. What a convenient way to exonerate the system of its failings. Just call everything bad about the American System ‘fascist’, and Americanism is spared condemnation. Instead, the problem is the ‘fascism’ that has somehow managed to infect the pristine US system. You see, it was the ‘fascist’ bug that messed up the system. This way, one sector of American political discourse can always pretend that Obama-ism or Trump-ism isn’t just another manifestation of Americanism but an errant ‘fascist’ mutation that seized power against the spirit of the Constitution and Apple Pie.

Jews who control the gods control Big Tech and Corpocracy that attack Trump and Populism — The Need for the INNER-WARRIOR among white patriots

People talk of Big Tech censorship and 'corpocracy' and the like, but it is Jewish Power that pulls the strings. In THE GODFATHER PART 2, Michael Corleone asks Hyman Roth about who had Pantangeli killed. Roth says the Rosato Brothers. But then, Michael asks, "But who gave the go-ahead. I didn't." In the world of organized crime, you couldn't just go around killing anyone on a whim, especially IF the target happened to be of some prominence. You needed permission, the go-ahead. So, Michael knew it was highly unlikely that the Rosato brothers would have just acted on their own. They needed the approval and assurance of higher authority. Roth was behind it all. And in the THE GODFATHER, Vito Corleone realizes the Tataglia wouldn't have gone so far without the backing of a bigger crime boss, Barzini(who was forming an alliance with the Five Families to bring down the Corleones). We need to know the Hyman Roth Rule in why what happens happens.

It's true that Big Tech and the Corporations have loads of cash, and money = power. But money on its own lacks compass or direction. Money is like gunpowder. It can make lots of explosions and shoot off countless rounds. So, obviously, the side with money has lots of raw power. But then, who gets to decide how that power is used. Who gets to choose what gets blown up or in which direction the guns are pointed? In WWII, Germany had lots of tanks and planes, and Russia had lots of tanks and guns. That was only raw power. It was the personalities(Hitler and Stalin) and ideologies(National Socialism and Soviet Communism) that decided the direction of gunfire. Soldiers, tanks, and planes do not wage wars on their own.
Consider the Military-Industrial-Complex. We've been told it is the most dominant force in government. Certainly, military contractors have their lobbyists and spread lots of cash all over D.C. They are war profiteers with boundless greed. But if it were only about money, MIC would be pushing for war with ANY country. Surely, war on Israel would be just as profitable as war on Iraq, Libya, Syria, Iran, Afghanistan, or whatever other nation. And given the facts of Israel's creation(via imperialism, ethnic cleansing, and what amounts to 'genocide' by UN definition of the term), occupation, apartheid policies, aid to terrorists, covert role in 9/11, espionage on the US, financial theft, and possession of nukes(made from stolen US material), a strong case can be made to sanction, bomb, invade, and occupy Israel. US could protect the Palestinians as the 'New Kurds' or 'New Kosovo Albanians'. And MIC could make tons of cash from Shock and Awe on Zion.

If indeed money is the main motivating force in D.C., then MIC would have steered US into many more wars, especially against Israel. It would have made billions from such a war. But how come such a prospect isn't even remotely conceivable. War on Israel? Why, Israel is "the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful nation I've ever known in my life." So, even though MIC is about money(and the egotism of power), it lacks inner compass. Its aggression must be turned toward certain targets by a higher power. So, MIC can be turned against Russia, Iran, China, Venezuela, Libya, and etc., but no one would dare to turn it against Israel(or any nation looked upon favorably by Jews, such as Saudi Arabia even though it is by far the #1 terrorist-sponsoring nation in the Middle East after Israel). So, those who control the gods control those who live by money and/or power egotism. MIC makes money by targeting countries hated by Jews. And military brass flexes its muscles against those hated by Jews. Jews control the gods, and money and muscle follow the gods. Why did the US military go from a right-wing institution to a crusader of globo-homo, Jew-worship, and Afromania around the world? Because having all those guns and bombs doesn't mean you got vision and direction. No, like hunting dogs, the military doesn't pick its own agendas or its own fights. It is directed by the higher powers, those who control the gods. And Jews control the gods. Military-Industrial-Complex stands down to the Jewish Tribal-Spiritual Complex that creates and controls the gods for whom people must work, pray, live for, and die for.

So, when we look at Big Tech de-platformings and Big Corporations denying service to certain groups, it isn't enough to say the problem is with corpocracy and Silicon Valley. And, money isn't the primary decider in all this. If it were, retail companies would have slammed BLM and Antifa for what the 'mostly peaceful demonstrators' did over last summer. Walmart and Target would have denied service to Democrats who encouraged the riots. They would have made announcements denouncing black thuggery. And they would have cut off services to progs and libby-dibs who fanned the flames. But, even after their stores were ransacked by black thugs fueled by BLM lunacy, the companies made announcements to the effect that they sympathized with the rage and hatred behind the violence and mayhem. They took the knee to the Negro because Jews control the gods and made Afromania one of the three gods of the new trinity. While cucking to Jewish gods will lead to loss of money, refusal to cuck will lead to total disgrace and downfall. Big Business figures it's better to lose half by cucking than lose all by not cucking.

People think Jack Dorsey is now more powerful than the US president, but that is total nonsense. If anything, Dorsey and Trump are in the same situation. They must do as the Jews say. Notice every time Jews kick Trump in the rump, he takes his frustrations out on Iran, China, or some other country. (A Jew-White Boxing match would be one where the Jew hits the white, and the white hits the Russian. Jew hits the white again, and the white hits the Chinese. Jew hits the white yet again, and white hits the Iranian. Jew hits the white once again, and the white hits the Palestinian. MAGA could not win despite its energy because it never dared to hit back the Jew.) It's like, when a master kicks the dog, the dog goes attacks the cat or rabbit or another dog.

If Dorsey is truly all that powerful, imagine the following scenario: Suppose Dorsey was so angered by BLM riots instigated by Obama in 2016 that he decided to ban POTUS from Twitter. Could he have gotten away with it? No way. The whole Hyman Roth of media complex, deep state, elite groups, and true believing prog masses would have attacked him. He would have faced legal sanctions and serious consequences.
Or suppose following last summer's riots and mayhem, big corporations decided to ban all Democrats and prominent figures who aided and abetted the riots and violence(against police and civilians alike) by encouragement, donations, lawfare, and the like. Would big business have dared to take such action? Would they have gotten away with it? No. They are just Money Power, and money has no inner compass. Money follows the gods, and Jews control the gods. Indeed, the $$$ shouldn't say "In God We Trust" but "We obey the gods controlled by Jews".
So, control of the gods is key. It's no wonder Jews used their power to erect the Holocaust Museum in Washington — given US history, the group most deserving of a prominent genocide museum is the American Indians, but leave it up to Jews to be obnoxious and occupy morality like they occupy West Bank — and then did everything to prevent the construction of Communist Horror Museum. The ghosts of countless dead goyim killed by Stalin, Mao, and etc. would compete with the gods of the Jews, especially as Jews played such a prominent role in communism as agents, killers, smugglers, propagandists, and spies.

So, who gave Jack 'Rosato' Dorsey the go-ahead to take out Trump? Who assured Dorsey that he wouldn't suffer any repercussions(and if anything, has much to gain) if he were to kick Donald Trump down the stairs? Of course, Jewish oligarchs in Big Tech don't need permission as they are among the people who control the gods. But goyim like Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, and Tim Cook(the crook) need the go-ahead by 'Hyman Roth'. If Jewish Power didn't want Trump taken down, Dorsey wouldn't have done so. Without Jewish approval(and insistence), Amazon and Apple wouldn't have moved against Parler. Super-rich white goyim have tons of money, but they don't control the gods. As such, they are busy appeasing the gods controlled by Jews. They live in a world where Jews, blacks, and homos are holy but where whites are defamed as having demon-possessed souls. So, white money today is 'spiritually' like the money of organized crime. It is dirty and has to be 'morally' laundered and cleansed by the Holy People. Jews are like the money-changers at the gates of temple. Rich whites can be redeemed only in service to Holy Jews. It's the only way 'dirty' white money becomes 'clean' money. Those who control the gods decide which money is 'clean', which is 'dirty'. No wonder the US is always eager to send billions over to Israel. Jews are holy, so when US sends big cash to holy Zion, it's as if American Wealth is symbolically cleansed. "As president, I pledge 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, etc billions to Israel"... Cheers and cheers, the $$$ have been cleansed.

Now, some may argue that rich white goyim AGREE with Jews on most matters, and therefore, it isn't so much a case of them obeying Jews but agreeing and working with Jews. But why do they think and feel that way? Because they were educated in Jewish-heavy elite institutions and get most of their news from Jewish-run media. So, the images, sounds, idols, icons, narratives, and mantras that fill up their minds have been formulated by Jews. Jews have long been masters at this. After all, they wrote the Bible, the Book of Everything that combine history, philosophy, mythology, story-telling, genealogy, poetry, law, and even humor. To create and control the gods, it's not enough to specialize in any one field. Rather, you must 'bring it all back home' like Bob Dylan's album said. After all, if Karl Marx had just focused on economics, he would have been a number-cruncher, a historian-accountant. Instead, he pulled together the various threads of philosophy, economics, history, morality, neo-spirituality, science, and prophecy all into a single package. As Jews combine images, stories, icons, and etc into one package through their control of institutions and industries, they effectively own the electronic bible of 'sacronics'. Hollywood is the new vatican, Ivy League is the new seminary of Jewish Gods Learning, such as how to worship globo-homo and magic negro(and how to shut up about Jewish Power or else be labeled an 'antisemitic' heretic).

Because Jews control the gods, they have the crucial leverage. Suppose there are two banks, one run by white conservatives and one by Jews. Suppose the Jewish Bank decides to deny services to a group for its 'white supremacist' ties, and suppose the White Bank decides to deny services to a group for supporting Israel and its terrorist activities. Suppose both banks are equally big. Now, which one will emerge unscathed and which one will face ruin? As whites are the devils in the New World Order where Jews control the gods, Jews can label anything as 'white supremacist' and deny it service. But, as Jews are the forever holy holocaust people, even the denying of service to Jewish terrorism and supremacism is taboo. So, the White Bank will come under media attack, lose customers(who are brainwashed), and lose partners. Jews control the gods, and that is crucial. But what do most whites do? They don't create and control their own gods but worship the gods of the Jews. Even Trump and his Trumpeteer morons are always yapping about 'Muh Israel' and 'Record Low Unemployment for blacks' even after Jews deny whites service and blacks go around beating up whites in riots. And organizations like TPUSA worship globo-homo and promote the tranny Lady Maga.

If white folks are to control the gods, there needs to be the rise of white prophets. Some called Trump the 'Todd-Emperor', but he was just a charlatan-hustler whose gods were all controlled by Jews even as he appealed to white votes. He was essentially a 'todd-jester'. Now, the white prophet doesn't have to be anti-Christian. Muhammad wasn't. If anything, Muhammad had great respect for Jesus and the Old Prophets. He saw himself as furthering the Prophecy.
A new prophecy is necessary in the West because it's obvious that Christianity has run its course. Catholicism is just lavender mafia homo club. Mainline Protestant churches are now run by lesbian crypto-atheists. Evangelicals are just dogs-of-Zion who believe in Noah's Ark. And Orthodox Christianity is just a mausoleum religion in Russia. More churches are built but stand empty. The fire has gone out of Christianity, and I doubt it can be relit. And yet, it was a great religion worthy of remembrance and still has inspirational, if not 'salvational', value.

And whites must learn to become inner-warriors. In the end, inner-warriors survive and can win because they have resilience and persistence. They have inner life, internal source of conviction and passion. In THE GODFATHER PART 2, Michael Corleone knows well enough that the Cuban military has more guns and supplies than Castro's men. They are supported by the US and Big Money. But, a guerrilla is willing to give his own life for the cause. He has inner fire whereas the Cuban military are mere mercenaries who take orders. So, Michael later tells others that the guerrillas can win. They certainly did in Cuba and Vietnam.
The outer-warriors have no inner conviction. They just do as told. They are willing to kill but unwilling to die for anything. White mentality is that of the outer-warrior. No wonder conservatives are so into honoring military men and veterans, the outer-warriors with guns who merely follow orders and do as told. But are these soldiers inner-warriors? Do they have core conviction?
Now, consider the Jews. If the US waged war on Israel or Jewish Power, Jews wouldn't go along. Jews are inner-warriors whose core loyalty is about Jewish Soul, Pride, and Power. But if white soldiers were ordered to fight useless Wars for Israel or turn their guns on fellow white folks, they will do just that. It's like the white police, total outer-warriors. Ordered by superiors to allow Antifa to beat up Trump supporters, the white police doesn't lift a finger. Ordered by superiors to attack and arrest Proud Boys, the white police does just that. It's the outer-manhood of holding clubs & guns and just doing as told. They are like dogs with no inner compass. Dogs will attack ANYTHING as ordered by the master. Only the inner-warrior is truly free because his sense of loyalty and rightness is independent of what the Power says. He is a soul-warrior than merely a body-warrior. Outer-warriors may have big swords or big guns, but their sense of war doesn't extend beyond what they're ordered to do.

Perhaps, whites make such poor inner-warriors because they had less need to develop an inner-warriorhood. After all, most of white history was about whites in white lands being led by white rulers. So, it was just understood and taken for granted that being an outer-warrior was synonymous with the well-being of white folks. In contrast, Jews had to master their inner-warrior-ness precisely because they lived under goyim for so long. Whether it was the Egyptians, Assyrians, Romans, or Christian Europe, the rulers and the masses were goyim, sometimes hostile to Jews. So, even as Jews pretended to go along and get along outwardly, they had to keep the Jewish fire burning within their hearts. They mastered the art of keeping the fire alive in the dark cellar. It's like the final scene of Martin Scorsese's THE SILENCE where it's implied the priest didn't really relinquish his faith in God/Jesus. The fire was kept alive in some hidden corner of his heart. In a way, his place in Japan is like the Jew's place in Christian Europe. The fire had to keep burning in some secret place.

In contrast, Europe, especially Northern Europe(and historic America is an extension of Northern Europe), became so powerful, rich, expansive, and dominant around the world that whites took it for granted that the outer manifestations of Western Power were in sync with the heart and souls of white folks. But then, the institution and industries fell into Jewish hands one by one. Also, as Jews gained control of the gods, they began to switch on anti-white neon signs within white souls. Whites watched TV & movies made by Jews, and their hearts became aglow with holy homo and Magic Negro.

Because the outer-power of the West traditionally looked out for white interests and was founded on white identity, there had been no need to develop a strong inner-self among white folks. By the way, Western Individualism isn't the same as having an inner-self. Individualism means the individual's freedom to do whatever, with his main objective being 'happiness', which in our time means videogames, food, and lots of trivialities. In contrast, an inner-self is deeper than any whim of an individual.

After a forest fire, everything looks dead and extinguished on the surface, and indeed those organisms that exist only above surface will have been totally destroyed. But why do plants sprout again and grow into trees? Because the roots deep inside the soil were untouched by the fire. Those plants have the inner-warrior.
Why did Romans fade from history whereas Jews survived as a people/culture? Roman Empire was entirely formulated as an external power. It was great as long as it could win wars and dominate others. But there was precious little sense of the inner-Roman. The Jews got demolished worse by the Romans than Romans by the Germanic Barbarians, but Jews survived and took over the world because they perfected the art of the inner-warrior. And the US will eventually leave Afghanistan because the Taliban, as ragtag and backward as they are, do have an inner sense of Jihad and tribal pride. In contrast, the mostly white soldiers in Afghanistan are mere mercenaries of Jews, and America's interests are purely political than spiritual.

Whites need their own Jihad mentality as inner-warriors. This way, even when the enemy takes over outer-power and scorches the landscape of patriots, the white inner-warriors will still believe in what they are, still hate the enemy, still carry on the fight, and wait for The Day of Reckoning.

Nothing Good and True is Possible in Western Discourse UNLESS People Name and Blame Jewish Power as the Driver of the Worst Trends around the World — Failure to Honestly Diagnose the Root Cause is Fatal

We see Jewish-Israel-Zionist-globalist connections everywhere, but no one, on both the mainstream 'left' and mainstream 'right', says anything. If someone on the dissident right notices patterns of Jewish Power, he is a 'nazi'. If someone on the dissident left notices similar things, he is an 'anti-Semite'. But even most dissident voices across the spectrum would rather not discuss Jewish Power.

Nothing, and I mean nothing, is possible in the West until Jewish Power is identified, exposed, and criticized(and ultimately condemned). As with cancer, you will not fix the problem IF you only focus on the symptoms. Weight loss, nausea, aches, fever, fatigue, skin problems, indigestion & bowel issues, appearance of sores, or etc. cannot be dealt with on an individual basis when there is an underlying cause. Now, one can feel nauseous without having cancer. Everyone suffers from indigestion on occasion. But there are times when symptoms are a manifestation of a deeper problem. They arise from something serious and must be diagnosed and treated in the most effective and honest manner. Also, existing minor problems can be severely exacerbated by a grave illness like cancer. Suppose someone has long suffered from a chronic but manageable problem, one that was inconvenient or painful at times but far from deadly. Such a problem can grow far direr when a person succumbs to cancer. Or to something like HIV. Many people have problems with minor infections but get over them or manage them throughout their lives. But if a person is infected with HIV(and left untreated), the immune system will break down and then even minor infections grow out of control and pose a serious threat. Consider how the chronic black problem had been more or less controlled in the US before Jewish Power began to kill the proud white cells that had kept black fever in check. Today, the power of white cells is so weak that even nasty yellow bitches in NYT can strike a blow against White America. Whiteness can be trampled on even by some over-educated Suzie Wong.

This is why anyone who whines and groans about the problem of America(the empire of the world) shouldn't be taken seriously IF he or she won't address the central issue of Jewish Power as a cancer of humanity. Surely, even some Jews notice this and want an end to Jewish Supremacism, just like some Germans realized the cancerous nature of Nazism. Sadly, sensible Germans didn't have the numbers, the means, and the power to stop Adolf Hitler before he caused serious damage. (To be sure, Nazi madness arose in concert/contention with other forms of madness, especially communism, Jewish supremacism, Japanese imperial fanaticism, and the utter neurosis of Anglo hypocrisy.) The ONLY way Nazism could be defeated was by overplaying its hand and forcing other nations to unite to crush it. There were Good Germans but not enough of them. And at this point, it's reasonable to say there aren't enough Good Jews and they lack the sufficient influence to stop the madness of Jewish Supremacists who are pushing the world to the brink of disaster(though many would argue the world is already there). If Jews can't manage their own cancer, then other peoples must... just like if Imperial Japan couldn't limit its own ambitions, others had to do it for them.
Now, some people(such as Susan Sontag) would argue that Anglo-Americanism(and Western Power in general) had long been cancerous in its seemingly limitless expansion around the world. But while there's no doubt that Western Power has wrought great destruction around the world — not only through invasions and wars but by technological innovation that, while making life easier for countless humans, befouled or entirely erased entire ecological systems — , there was also tremendous construction as well. So, the West was in a way the great cancer but also the great chemo/cure of humanity that lifted the rest of mankind from the chronic disease of backwardness, superstition, and tyranny. (Tyrannical power of the Imperialist West was necessary to break the grip of local tyrannies that had defined most of humanity from time immemorial, i.e. even though the British Imperialists were exploitative and even ruthless at times in India and China, those non-white civilizations started a new chapter of progress and understanding only under the revolutionary influences from the West. The West also abolished slavery around the world, a kind of mega-civil-war among humanity that dwarfed the American Civil War. If Union Imperialism justified itself by ending slavery in the South, couldn't one make a case that Western Imperialism waged wars for the liberation of mankind, especially in the Global South where slavery was hardly considered a 'sin'? Of course, the West had also greatly profited from the slave trade, was often hypocritical & inconsistent, and often invoked virtue & progress as rationales to justify imperial rule, but the grand arc of modern history leaves no doubt that the predominant concept of 'human rights', 'liberty' and 'justice' all arose in the West and spread outward. In other words, it's ironic how those who call for 'de-colonization' are actually products of Western moral-and-cultural colonization. But precisely because they are ignorant or repressive of history, their ideology can only be rabid and insane. They're incapable of grasping the complex threads of history, thereby unable to give credit where it's due. At any rate, modern Western History could be seen as either the cancer or the cure of humanity, and only time will tell if, in the end, it was all worth it. Currently, the way things are going, it seems the entire Western Enterprise is falling into disaster not only for the West but for the world. And yet, the main reason for this is not due to White Power but its defamation and demise, thereby making white ability, talents, and skill be used manly to promote Jewish supremacism, Negrolatry, and Globo-Homo-mania, all of which have no redeeming facet as opposed to Western Imperialism of yesteryear that, despite its failings and abuses, also spread principles of rule of law, property rights, ideals of liberty, Christianity, science & technology, individual conscience, and art as personal expression. In contrast, Jewish Supremacism is essentially Judeo-Nazism. Negrolatry means we must worship Negroes as idols of trash culture. Globo-Homo-mania says it isn't enough to allow homos to be free to bugger one another because the whole world must be compelled to celebrate... homo fecal penetration and tranny penis-cutting.)

Take recent events, and they make no sense without mentioning Jewish Power. Also, nothing could really be done about them because JQ is OQ, or Jewish Question is Out of the Question. Therefore, even those who condemned certain events or trends in the strongest terms eventually came up empty because they didn't address the SOURCE of the problem. For example, condemning MIC or the Military-Industrial-Complex only goes so far because its policies are shaped under Jewish Supremacist Power. Just think. If MIC is simply about warmongering so that weapons-industry can reap more profits and so that hawks can have fun playing games on the global chessboard, why doesn't the US ever target Israel or Jewish interests? After all, ANY war or act of aggression can be profitable or 'fun' for those of MIC. Yet, Israel and nations like Saudi Arabia are never targeted even though both had something to do with 9/11 whereas Iraq and Iran had NOTHING to do with it. Also, if 'War on Terror' is what US policy is about, why did it turn a blind eye to Israel and Turkey aiding ISIS & Alqaeda terrorists in Syria? Why did the US back the Jihadis in Libya? While MIC does exist and is about profits and gamesmanship, it is not the ultimate arbiter of US foreign policy. US is ruled by Jewish Supremacist Power, which decides and directs what is permissible for the MIC. Think of MIC as a hunter who loves to kill animals. If MIC could do it as pleases, it would try to bag ANY animal. But suppose MIC can only hunt what is permitted, and suppose that is decided by the power higher than MIC. Surely, if the hunting grounds have bears, tigers, leopards, wolverines, boars, and elk BUT if hunters can only go after bears and tigers but not leopards, wolverines, board, and elk, then we can't say the hunters have the final say in what gets killed and what gets spared. If hunters could do as they please, they'd likely shoot anything that moves. MIC is like the hunter, but it only gets to hunt what is allowed. And that decision is made by Jewish Supremacists. MIC doesn't care as long as it gets to HUNT something. It's like the mindset of hunting dogs. The canines want to hunt something but don't really care WHAT as long as they're allowed to track and maul something. John Bolton, CIA goons, most military generals, and weapons industry are content as long as they're given something to threaten, encircle, and/or destroy, something to reap massive rewards from in profits and positions. John McCain was a very good dog to the Jewish Supremacists. MIC is like athletes in a sports team. They don't really care whom they play against as long as they get to play.

This is why anti-war positions that failed to discuss the Jewish Element were bound to fail. It's like denouncing hunting dogs without mentioning the hunter who directs the dogs to attack certain animals. During the invasion of Iraq, Tucker Carlson(who supported the invasion) interviewed Patrick Buchanan and, while conceding that Buchanan had every right to uphold his anti-war position, sniped at him for having made 'antisemitic' remarks about the Jewish Lobby. But how could anyone make sense of the Iraq War without mentioning the role of Jewish influence? Today, Carlson is much lauded by even those on the Dissident Right for saying it like it is, but the common thread has been the unwillingness to address the JQ. Now, some will say Carlson won't have a job for long if he broaches that topic, but then, none of what he says will matter because the heart of the matter is Jewish Supremacist Power. Carlson can rail about this, that, and everything under the sun, but unless he mentions, exposes, and shames Jewish Supremacist Power, it will go on creating new problems for America and all the world. Carlson can blame 'leftists', 'liberals', 'globalists', antifa, BLM, greed, the 'elites', and so on and so forth, but it only amounts to noticing the symptoms of cancer but never mentioning the cancer.
If Bobby is throwing water balloons, setting things on fire, shooting spitballs, tossing firecrackers, and other naughty deeds, will he stop acting badly if HE isn't called out and named as the culprit? Suppose everything he does is condemned but he himself always goes unmentioned. So, throwing water balloons, setting fire on things, and etc. are recognized as bad behavior, but they are never connected to Bobby the bad kid. Why would Bobby stop acting badly when, even when his actions are condemned, he himself is never named and, if anything, is coddled and praised. (It's like there is so much talk of blacks as victims of violence, but there's far less mention about blacks being the perpetrators. Whether in Africa, the US, or the UK, we hear so many stories of blacks as victims but not as perpetrators. Thus, the effect is more sympathy for those poor poor blacks but no pressure on blacks to stop acting like savages.) Tucker Carlson will never name the Jew when it comes to US open borders policy, but he will praise Israel for its own tight border policy. Now, some will say that Carlson is, wink wink, naming the Jew by making such connections. But such pussyfooting won't go far, not least because many idiots won't pick up the dog-whistling and no one in the conservative movement will get the memo that there needs to be a serious change in the narrative. As long as Jewish Power goes unmentioned, it will continue to act badly because it is never blamed for anything. Even when what they do is disapproved, the responsibility never falls on their lap. In 2016, Donald Trump seemed to do the unthinkable, especially in the rah-rah-military GOP, when he condemned the Middle East wars, but he never mentioned Jewish Power even though it was the main force behind the disasters. If anything, Trump sold himself as Israel's best friend and reviled Iran, a nation that had NOTHING to do with 9/11. And even as Trump called for improved ties with Russia, he said nothing as to why US-Russia relations got strained in the first place. The failure of diplomacy resulted from Jewish rage about Russia not fully cucking to globo-homo Empire of Judea. While Trump failed to mention the obvious Jewish Factor in the animus between US and Russia, Jewish Supremacism went all out to smear Trump and Vladimir Putin with false accusations of collusion. So, Jews can name and target Trump, Putin, Russia, Iran, and White America(as 'white supremacist' central) with vitriol, but no one better name the Jews as being the primary force behind global tensions. If Jews are to be mentioned, it is only as Eternal Holocaust Victims, Forever Victims of Antisemitism, the Most Wise & Wonderful People on Earth, and the Noble People of Israel. Only praise and no criticism of Jews. This means Jews have a power over the West not unlike what Hitler had over Germany or Stalin over Russia. You could name them and talk about them but only in the most positive and glowing manner, and NEVER in a critical, let alone condemnatory, manner. And of course, this has set the template for other aspiring groups, especially blacks and homos. If you want to talk about blacks, it better be in praise, sympathy, awe, or rapture but NEVER in a critical tone. If you want to discuss homos, it better be in mindless celebration of 'rainbow' sodomy and penis-and-balls-cutting(among trannies). Of course, blacks and homos enjoy such protections because Jews control the media, academia, & the deep state and have all the politicians in their pockets. As for capitalists who only care about money, they have no ideas or values other than More Profits and Good Publicity. Rules of publicity are shaped by media and academia in the West and by the reigning power in many non-Western nations. So, companies are eager to present themselves as all about BLM and globo-homo in the West while the very same companies dare not push globo-homo in places like Saudi Arabia. It's like McDonalds, the main cow-killer around the world, will only sell lamb-burgers in India. That's the essence of capitalist morality.

John Mearsheimer in The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities says the reigning ideology that drives the US is 'Liberal Hegemonism', but if so, why are most US politicians all about tribal Israel? Why is the US closer to theocratic Saudi Arabia than to more modern and secular Arab states like Syria? Why is US 'liberalism' opposed to border security for Hungary but totally for it for Israel? Why is the 'liberal establishment' in the US less hostile to China than to Russia despite the latter being less repressive? And if 'liberalism' is about more freedom, why are the elites for more censorship and more suppression of free speech? And if postwar 'liberalism' is about more equality, why are the 'liberal elites' not bothered by the rise of super oligarchs like Jeff Bezos who do the bidding of ADL and Sergei Brin & Mark Zuckerberg who are Zionist-Jews? And if 'liberalism' is about colorblind recognition of all, why does the US care so much about black lives while turning a blind eye to all the victims of black crime and violence? So much for 'liberal hegemony'. This is all the more surprising coming from someone who wrote about the Israel Lobby. Did he suddenly get cold feet and change his tune, like that worthless whore Amy Chua? In truth, the problem of American foreign policy isn't the preponderance of 'liberal hegemony' but the contradictions between Jewish supremacist hegemony(as the real power in the US & West) and the 'liberal' masquerade(as smoke-and-mirrors to fool the world that US is about 'muh freedom' than 'muh Israel'). US is a nation where both parties totally cuck to the Zionist demand that BDS be suppressed while pretending American Values are about justice for all. The Jewish Mayor of Minneapolis was seen kneeling and bawling before the coffin of George Floyd the Fentanyl Groid, but when did he or his ilk get on their knees for all the Palestinians killed by IDF death squads and all the Arabs starved, bombed, or otherwise killed by US war machine that takes its marching orders from Jewish Supremacists?

We cannot fully understand the aftermath of 9/11 without naming the Jew. Even 9/11 cannot be fully understood without considering the Zionist angle, something that has been suppressed far more than 9/11's connection to the Saudis. The financial meltdown of 2008 owed largely to policies pushed by Jews, but Jews got to blame dumbass Bush II and install Obama the 'socialist' as puppet who, surprise surprise, bailed out the big banks and then later unleashed more Wars for Israel in the Middle East. (And of course, globo-homo was a Jewish proxy from the beginning, and it came to full tutti-fruition under Obama, another proxy of the Jews.) Cuck Culture and Jungle Fever owe largely to Jewish control of media, entertainment, and narrative, and it has been devastating to the white race. Jewish advertising and propaganda are pushing the Afro-Colonization of White Wombs, and white women and white men go along as they're little more than mental slaves of Jewish Supremacist manipulation. Since the election of Donald Trump, it's been Jews, Jews, Jews pulling the strings, but no one mentions this most crucial and obvious fact in the institutions and industries that matter. While plenty of people, especially on the 'right', dismissed or denounced the Russia Collusion Hoax, they dared not tie the smear-campaign with Jewish Power. They blamed Democrats, 'liberals', MSM, 'progressives', the deep state, and so on, but they never said anti-Russian hysteria is almost entirely a Jewish Thing. (It's like blaming 'Democrats' and 'socialism' for the demise of Detroit in a criminal hellhole.) Seriously, if any people other than Jews controlled the US, would there be such bad feelings between Russia(that actually wants good relations) and the US(where all the goy cuck politicians are so afraid of Jews that they dutifully bark at Russia while being kicked in the ass by Jews?) So, even as the Russia Collusion Hoax has been exposed as false, nothing will change and more such nonsense will be created out of the thin air because the main culprit, Jewish Supremacist Power, was not named and shamed. (Similarly, will anyone mention Israel and Jewish Power as the force behind Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell? Of course not, so Israel and Mossad will just find OTHER people to create honeypots to trap and blackmail others.) As for Ukraine-gate, the Jewish Hand in it was so obvious that there were murmurs of a Jew D'etat, but of course, the Jewish-run MSM was busy attacking such notions as 'paranoid' and, yes, 'antisemitic'. Jews conspire and act like negative Jewish stereotypes but then blame others for daring to notice. As usual, it was the dissident elements that did most of the noticing while most of 'mainstream' media just toed the line yet once again.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/EmPIZNCXDNNQ/

Then, take the Covid Hysteria. Sure, it's a real disease, but there's no question that the Jewish-run media way over-hyped it to shut down the economy, thereby dampening the only thing going well for Trump. If Covid had hit the US during Obama or under Hillary, would there have been such massive coordinated shutdowns? No way. And then, there was the BLM fiasco, the logical outcome of Jewish fanning the flames of the '1619 project' in the pages of NYT in concert with other PC nuttery. Jewish Power is Mao-like. It is never blamed for anything. Mao Zedong's Great Leap Forward devastated the Chinese economy and may have led to the deaths of over 30 million, but he got little if any blame. If anything, he was able to pull off another nuttery with the Cultural Revolution. Likewise, the very Jewish supremacists who gave us the Iraq Disaster and the financial disaster got to pull off more disasters with Libya, Syria, and Ukraine. And then, as if sanctioning Russia and Syria was not enough, Jewish Power chose to sensationalize Covid and sanction the entire Western economy because it didn't like the trends toward nationalism and populism. Lock everyone down under the power of 'experts'. And then, Jewish Power set off a variation of Cultural Revolution via BLM-Antifa riots and craziness. Why was Mao able to pull off another act of nuttery? Because he wasn't named and blamed for the Great Leap Forward. Because the extent of his megalomania was underestimated. Why doesn't Jewish Power ever stop in its vileness? Because it is never named and blamed and because people are unwilling to acknowledge the sociopathic nature of Jewish neurosis. Sure, some people will denounce Antifa, BLM, deep state, the 'liberal media', and etc., but they still won't connect the dots and arrive at a full picture that shows Jewish Supremacism as the reigning power of the West, the power behind the power. As such, Jews will continue to act the Bad Mao, or Maoitz.

Of course, just like the excesses of the Cultural Revolution came back to bite Mao, the mayhem of BLM and Antifa has caused damage to some Jews as well. But the fact is the Jewish-run Democratic Party, Jewish-run media, and Jewish-run deep state coordinated the protests/riots as yet another attempt to bring down Trump. It doesn't matter that Trump is a shameless shill for Zion because, as far as most Jews are concerned, he is the voice of white populism that calls for nationalism than globalism. Also, as US is the metropole of the world empire, Jews figure that what happens in the US has seismic effect on the rest of the empire. So, with both Covid and Floyd-mania, the crisis was orchestrated into a Scylla and Charybdis affair. Put Trump between a rock and a hard place. No lockdown, and Trump gets blamed as a murderer of every death. Lockdown, and the Trump economy vanishes into the thin air. Take action against BLM-Antifa rioters and terrorists, and Trump is attacked as dictator, tyrant, and mass killer. Do nothing and he is seen as weak and wussy by his own supporters.
This is why you must name the Jew. It's like the fortunes of the Corleones in THE GODFATHER reversed ONLY WHEN Vito Corleone realized it had been Barzini all along. Without that knowledge and counter-moves based on that knowledge, the Corleones were surely finished. Who is the 'Barzini' behind all the recent BS and madness? It sure ain't the Eskimos. But white people don't think or act like Vito Corleone. They are more like that worthless Fredo who will sacrifice his own family for 'something for me'. Take Mitt Romney, who can also be compared with Senator Geary that lowlife scum. But it may be worse than that. Too many whites are like Mr. Martini(Danny De Vito) in ONE FLEW OVER THE CUCKOO'S NEST. Tucker Carlson and Alex Jones talk big, but if you ask them to mention who has the real power, they turn all Martini-like in the following scene: White race, now a bunch of Martinis who can't even say the obvious truth.


These days, whites are cucked beyond belief. White women have been indoctrinated to hate white men and are into jungle fever. And white men, so cucky-wucked, are either willing to hand their women to Negroes or unwilling to lift a finger to defend white women. But then, what's the point of defending your women when they spit at you as a bunch of weak, wussy, white 'racists' while celebrating interracism? White men are demoralized on both 'left' and 'right'. On the 'left', you got cucky-wucks so eager to display their proggy bona-fides by celebrating the Great Replacement and the Afro-Colonization of White Wombs. On the 'right', you got white guys who figure it's futile to stand up for the white race and defense of white women as any expression of whiteness is 'racist' and as many white women will attack you for implying that white men and white women should be part of a unity and that white women need protection by evil white men. So many white women get their worldview from TV and movies where white women are protected from venal disgusting white men by noble-minded Negroes. Of course, reality says otherwise, but people prefer fantasy over reality, just like people prefer drug-induced states than sobriety. White Fantasy, not White Fragility, is the real problem.

Recently, vile black and Asian bitches in NYT and other media outlets have written awful things about white women, but who owns and controls NYT and publications like Time? Who hired those nasty bitches whose voices were given a platform? Do Hawaiians control NYT? Never mind the small potatoes. Who is the big rotten apple behind them all? Barzini was the power behind the Tataglias, and Hyman Roth was the power behind the Rosato brothers. Who are the power behind the nasty NYT 'woke' bitches? It is, of course, the Jews, but all we hear from the 'right' is, "Dear Jews, those wokesters are coming for us whites today, but they will come after you wonderful Jews some day, and we whites don't want to see that because we wuv you Jews sooooooooooooooo much." How utterly pathetic and craven considering it was the Jews who set those wokesters on the whites. It'd be like the Corleones trying to protect Barzini from the Tataglias whom Barzini is using against the Corleones. So, these white cuckservatives do nothing as BLM and Antifa destroy white statue and monuments, but they raise a fuss about the rare BLM march in D.C. that was anti-Israel.

Anyway, the nasty black, yellow, and other bitches in the media attack white women over the fact that white men used violence against blacks to protect their own women. In pure Hollywood fashion of White Fantasy, the narrative goes that some shrill deranged white woman falsely accused an innocent black man of rape or something, and then white mobs descended on blacks and lynched half of them. While white-on-black violence was indeed part of US history, only a fool would believe that white women were all liars and black men accused of rape were all innocent.
Furthermore, if we tally up the numbers of all the white women robbed, assaulted, raped, and/or murdered by blacks, it's pretty astronomical especially since the 1960s. So, the violence was far from a one-way street. True, there were explosions of white violence and even what might be called pogroms against black communities in the US, but there has also been the problems of black crime and violence against whites in the South, North, Midwest, the West, and all over. Blacks even rape girls in Okinawa. But why is there no outrage about all the black-male-on-white-female violence? All the beatings, rapes, robberies, murders? Also, what about the violence by black girls on white girls? Just like tougher black guys usually beat up and humiliate white guys, tougher black girls usually beat up white girls. And yet, all the moral outrage is about precious black lives, all the funnier when blacks are the main killers of blacks. Black Lives Matter More because Jews control media, academia, & entertainment and elevated blacks to higher moral status. Also, in a nation as sports-sex-and-pop-music-crazed as the US(and the modern world in general), many people have come to see Negroes as the most awesome. The combination of pop idolatry, black megalomania, white search for replacement-spirituality(with demise of Christianity), and Jewish supremacist control of media/academia has led to a kind of black supremacism. So, even though interracial violence has often been about black men against white women, the only concern is what might have been done to black men because of white men acting in defense of white women. (This is funnier when blacks will often kill each other over someone saying something about someone's mama.) US history used to be about prizing white lives over non-white lives — though whites were free to slaughter one another in duels, gun-fights, and wars — , but social reforms led to the need to regard the lives of all Americans equally.

But then, something happened. Jewish Power emerged to favor Jewish lives above all others. So, it was Zionists over Palestinians. It was about berating the Christian West for 'antisemitism' and other crimes against humanity while never discussing the Jewish role in the history of wars, mayhem, exploitation, and invasions. Jews were only to be regarded as wise men or wonderful entertainers OR the most tragic victims of 'antisemitism' and the Holocaust. So, thousands of Jews killed in Cossack pogroms in Ukraine mattered more than millions of Slavs killed by Jewish Bolsheviks. A handful of Jews killed by Muslim terrorists mattered more than an entire people crushed and destroyed by Zionists and Wars for Israel. Thus, the filthy lies of BLM are following in the footsteps of Jewish Supremacism that, instead of insisting on equal worth of all Americans, nudged the US toward favoring Jews uber alles. Jews came to hate the notion of colorblindness because it would mean Jewish Power should be scrutinized just like white power. It meant Zionist Israel should be shown no favor over Palestinians or Iran. Jews, with their higher IQ, wealth, and arrogance, didn't want to settle for being equal with the rest of mankind. They insisted on their special vaunted status. Of course, Jews couldn't brazenly spell out their supremacism like Hitler and the Nazis did. Just like Wall Street bundled bad loans with good loans via derivatives, Jews bundled their supremacism with all the lame talk of 'liberalism', 'spreading democracy', 'fighting racism', 'combating white supremacism', 'remembering the Holocaust', and etc. Jews have certainly used Antifa thugs and lawfare as their proxy goon force to shut down any expression of white populism. And Jews push BLM to give the impression that 'white supremacism', not Jewish globalism and urban elite gentrification, has been the animating force behind tougher policing and increased incarceration. Instead of talking about Bill Clinton's new policies and Michael Bloomberg's Stop-and-Frisk, let's talk about the 'legacy of centuries' of whites being so eeeeevil. And let's not discuss how the Israel military and police treat Palestinians 100x worse than how blacks were treated by white police in apartheid South Africa.

No Honesty, No Truth. No Truth, then no True Justice. Anyone who rags on and on about this or that issue without naming the Jew simply cannot be taken seriously. Akin to worthless doctor who notices the outward symptoms but never names the deeper disease, those who criticize and/or condemn recent problems but refuse to name the Jew are close to useless. Fish rots from the head, and the head ain't Eskimo or Hawaiian.

Now, will all problems dissolve into the air IF Jewish Power is exposed and dealt with? Of course not. Humanity will always have problems, and all parts of the world were plagued with problems with or without Jews. So, there will always be more problems and other problems. But, the main problems facing the West cannot be understood apart from Jewish Supremacist grip on so many key institutions and industries. And the agenda of this power is nothing less than the total humiliation and destruction of the white race. Jews told white women to hate white men, and so many white women did. But now, they are being set upon by Jews, blacks, and yellows but no longer with the protection of white men whom they forsook or denounced. And white men watch all this anti-white-female violence, physical or verbal, but do nothing because they are either afraid or figure what's the point when so many white bitches are into jungle fever or spew hatred at white males. And what power molded the minds of white folks, especially since the 60s? It was 'Barzini' all along.

Now, some whites pray for rich and powerful Jews finally seeing the light and forming an alliance with whites as Diversity, especially blacks, turn on Jews. It's been the great white dream of William F. Buckley, John Derbshire, and Jared Taylor. But, it won’t happen. Jewish-black tensions go way back, but Jews always managed to buy off blacks. If Jews can buy off all whore politicians of both parties, why not blacks? Look at Al Sharpton. He’s a 'house nigger' now working on the Jewish Plantation. Also, black Jew-baiting is tactical than principled: It is merely a way for blacks to demand for more stuff from Jews. For example, blacks will pretend to care about Palestinians… but then fall back in line when Jews give them more stuff. It’s the same old song. The real question is why isn't there a fraying between whites and Jews? Could it be that whites still haven't figured out that most Jews despise them, not least because of the wussy cuckery? The more whites cuck, the more Jewish Power dic*-slaps them as weak and pathetic.

Also, despite Jewish-black tensions, both sides have the eye on the prize, and it’s all about milking whitey. Jewish supremacism is premised on white submission, and so, Jews must promote ‘white guilt’ to make whites subservient to Jews. And Jews use jungle fever and jungle faith to promote ‘white guilt’ and white cuckery. So, even though blacks may beat up some Jews and rob/loot some Jewish communities, that’s all small potatoes to Jews, the cost of 'doing business'. Even a few Jewish eggs must be broken to make the Jewish Supremacist Omelet. Jews want to control the world, and that totally depends on the obeisance of whites as the subservient managerial class. Whites must be to Jews what the German managerial class were to Hitler.

Blacks also know that black supremacy depends on 'honkeys' as White Atlas as supportive shoulders for black Negrolympian-ism. Without whites, blacks would be jungle buffoons beating on bongo drums and chucking spears at hippos. It was through whites that blacks gained access to all the good stuff of modern economics, science/technology, medicine, sports, pop music, and etc. Of course, black pride simply can’t accept those facts, but deep down inside, blacks intuit they be nothing without white folks. And so, blacks also rely on the promotion of ‘white guilt’ to keep whites bowing their heads to blacks, so blacks can keep leeching off whites.

Now, whites should be speaking truth to power, but most white 'conservatives' are like the ever-faithful battered girlfriend in relation to Jewish Power. Imagine some Jewish guy fooling around with other girls while routinely beating up and insulting his white girlfriend who, however, prays that her undying loyalty will finally pay dividends when the Jewish boyfriend goes from prodigal punk to faithful husband. To such a person, we'd say, "Yeah, keep dreaming." Sadly, that is the White Dream regarding Jewish Power.

Now, it's well-known why it's so difficult to name, let alone blame, the Jew. Jews are immensely powerful and can destroy just about anyone. But Jews not only have money power & influence but 'spiritual' power as the Holy Holocaust People. They've sacralized Jewishness as synonymous with the highest morality on grounds that NO PEOPLE suffered as much as the Jews did. So, even as Jews are pitiless against their enemies, rivals, and anyone they don't like, the current West is infected with bottomless pity for those poor, poor, helpless Jews, oh boo hoo hoo. Jews learned the art of Christianity, which served as the moral shield for the expansionist West, i.e. the mighty use of swords and guns to conquer the world while invoking Jesus and the Early Christians who faced persecution and death; so, even as Western armies invaded and conquered through violence, they put on a passion play of being the martyrs of history. Thus, the West got 'spiritual' cover for their temporal deeds. This was why Jews were so eager to replace Christianity with a new mass cult in the West, and it was Holy Holocaust Worship, along with Queertianity and BLM. Holy Holocaust Worship was mainly designed to make Europeans and Christians worship Jews as the newly sacrificed christ-figures who died for the sins of white folks. Globo-Homo is to replace Easter and Christian festivities with celebration of sodomy and tranny-degeneration that defile Christian values. And BLM is to infect white Americans with forever 'white guilt', thereby being too cucky and browbeaten to stand up for white identity and interests. Jews were behind all three.
So, the problem for many people is not merely the monetary influence of Jews but their moral prestige that was concocted with Jewish control of media, academia, and whore politicians. Money and might alone won't secure long-term power. Money is about buying influence, and might is about ruling with fear. While power by money and might can last, it has no real respect among the people who, when the opportunity arises, may rise up in rebellion. Consider the fall of the Shah of Iran. He had money and might(via the secret police) but no respect from the people. And that is why Jews worked not only at making lots of money but creating a moral cult of Jews as Holy Holocaust People. Thus, anyone who notices Jewish Power in a critical manner is denounced as a 'nazi' even though Jews now got all the power and money while critics of Jewish Power simply want a fairer reckoning with history.
But however difficult it may be to overcome internal psychological pressures and external social pressures, people of the West must break out of the conditioning and begin to honestly address the problems of Jewish Power. Unless this cancer is exposed, there is no hope for truth, reform, and restoration of sanity & balance. During the Cold War, there was a journal called Problems of Communism. Today, what we need most is the Problems of Jewish Supremacism. Just don't counter Jewish supremacism with a supremacism of your own. Just because so many Jews are a**holes doesn't mean that anti-Jewish a**holery, like that of Hitler and the Nazis, was justified.