Logic of 'Antisemitism' Would Suggest Powerful Jews Are the Most 'Anti-Semitic' for Their Actions Exhibiting Obscene Levels of Jewish Power and Influence

Is Alan Dershowitz an Anti-Semite for saying Jews indeed do possess disproportionate power and influence?

ALAN DERSHOWITZ SAYS JEWS SHOULDN’T APOLOGIZE FOR THEIR POWER

Of course, Dershowitz is full of BS as he frames the argument on the assumption that Jews are being ‘defensive’ about their power and wealth when, in truth, they are being DECEPTIVE, a big difference. ‘Defensive’ implies apologetics, anxiety and self-doubt that perhaps Jews aren’t deserving of all their power, influence, wealth, and success. But, there’s hardly any evidence of such. The Jewish denial of their wealth and power(or at least the nefarious influences associated with them) isn’t a manifestation of guilt or shame but a ham-fisted strategy to secure their dominant position in a society where they are a small minority.
When confronted with the facts of their power and influence, when have Jews squirmed & sweated, wrung their hands, and apologized for having too much or misusing them? Instead, they hiss with venom at any probing question, which is denounced as ‘Anti-Semitic’.
If Dershowitz were honest, he’d admit that the neurosis among some Jews about their power has less to do with feeling defensive or sorry than with the awareness that it’s no easy feat for Jews to ‘earn like Episcopalians(actually much more) while voting like Puerto Ricans’. How do Jews maintain their image of ‘champions of equality and social justice’ when they are by far the richest and most privileged people in the US, indeed the whole world? This makes some Jews nervous, not apologetic, as they feel they are deserving of all they got and, if anything, more and more.

Traditionally, the great majority of Jews were associated with the Political Left, so much so that many goyim still tend to identify Jewish influence with socialism and communism, ROTFL. Jewish Power abandoned true leftism long ago, but many Jews were weaned on leftist ideology and tactics. They are now fully tribal-capitalist-imperialist but were acculturated on radicalism.
It’s no wonder that much of the 21st century is a story of Jews trained in leftism using left-like technics to gain more power for Zion, all the while trying to transform leftism into something almost the reverse of its original intent, much like how the super-capitalists in METROPOLIS(directed by Fritz Lang) create a double of Maria whose message to the masses is the very opposite of what the real Maria has been preaching.
Much like today’s Chinese Elites invoke Maoist guerilla mythology to justify and reinforce their iron grip over a vast managerial state, Jewish Power in this century plays the role of the global capitalist-tribalist hegemon while retaining the radical will of yesteryear.

There’s been much talk of the Neocons and their political transformation but more interesting is the story of the Neolibs as they, more than the Neocons, represented the Jews who held the most sway and influence. While the ex-Trotskyite Neocon turn to the Right was swift and dramatic in the Seventies and Eighties, what went under the radar was the fact that the same process had happened to the Neolib Jews who were simply more adept at veiling this change among themselves.
Even before the Neocons fully turned to the Political Right, they(still as Democrats) represented a political minority in the Jewish Community by asking some inconvenient questions about the relationship between Zionism(supported by Jews of both parties) and Leftism.
If Neocons turned against the Left in their hardcore support of Zionism, the Liberal Jews wanted to have it both ways by supporting Zionism while serving as the leading light of American Leftism.
In the long run, the Neolib influence was far more consequential in all its devious and mendacious ingenuity. If the Neocons joined the Right(though only to use the White Right to serve the Jewish Ultra-Right), the Neolibs faced a far more arduous task of remaining on the Political Left while prioritizing the support of Zion and transforming leftism into an ever malleable ideology that could be squeezed and stretched in any shape or manner to suit Judeo-centric needs. Their monstrous brain-child was ‘wokeness’, many tenets of which run counter to traditional and true leftism. It is the Fake Maria of METROPOLIS.

Granted, the Neocons and Neolibs played a tag-team match. One wonders if Jewish American influence might have been more ideologically consistent and conscientious if (1) the American Right and GOP remained anti- or counter-Jewish (2) virtually all of Jewish Power was on the Democratic Side. If the GOP had remained anti-, counter-, or non-Jewish, it would have been more difficult for Zionist Jews to threaten the Democratic Party with defection of personnel and donations to the GOP UNLESS the Democrats cave to all Jewish-Zionist demands.
The Zionist shtick has always been, “Most of us Jews are Democrats, but we donate a lot of money to the GOP too. GOP totally cucks to Israel, and more of us Jews could migrate to there… unless you Democrats grant all our demands on Zion.”
If there were no Neocons and if the GOP adamantly rejected Jewish/Zionist influence, Jews would have considerably less leverage over the Democrats. They couldn’t threaten the Party with defection to another party. Then, Jews couldn’t be as demanding on issues related to Zionism and Wars for Zion, and conscientious Jews and genuine progressives would worry less about lots of Jewish talent and money going to the other party.
Neocons not only took over the GOP but ensured that Neolib Zionists would have a free rein in the Democratic Party. Neocon presence in the GOP meant Neolib Jews could always threaten the Democrats, “We can join our Neocon brethren in the GOP unless you agree to all our demands on issues related to Israel.” The result is the ‘uniparty’.

Jewish commentators and social critics often argue that Anti-Semitic Stereotypes or Tropes never seem to go away. What are their examples of ‘Antisemitism’? The perception that Jews control the mass media. The suspicion that Jews control banking and finance. The accusation that Jews have inordinate controls of elite institutions of society and abused their power to make the US fight Wars for Israel. The impression that Jews are more loyal to other Jews around the world than to the particular nation in which they reside. And there are others too: Jews control vice industries such as gambling. Jews promote drugs, illegal and legal, to demoralize and even destroy goy peoples. Jews push for Mass Migration-Invasion to increase Diversity to play divide-and-rule among fractured and contentious goyim. Jews promote prostitution, pornography, and sex slavery(especially with Ukrainian women) to exploit goy women as sexual commodities. Jews are two-faced and play both sides. Jews favor minority elitism over majority power. Jews are rank hypocrites in insisting that goyim support Jewish identity, territoriality, and nationality while doing everything to undermine national autonomy & sovereignty among gentiles. Jews seek to drive a wedge between goy men and goy women to weaken organic unity within the goy population. Jews invoke universal principles to cynically disarm goy nationalists while strengthening their own identity and tribalism. While Jews are perfectly fine with well-armed tribal brethren in Jewish-majority Israel, Jews seek to take away the guns of American goyim so that the Jewish-controlled state will have monopoly of arms over the populace. And so on.

Now, if all such inklings, suspicions, impressions, perceptions, accusations, and convictions are ‘Anti-Semitic’ and if we push its moral logic to conclusion, then one would have to admit that those who PRACTICE acts and behaviors that support ‘Anti-Semitic’ THEORIZING are most guilty of ‘antisemitism’.
If John commits murders and if I suspect that he is committing murders, who is more guilty of Anti-Johnism, that is IF ‘Anti-Johnism’ is defined as an unwarranted negative view of John as wicked character despite his virtue, nobility, and innocence? If John is indeed innocent and a wonderful fellow but if I suspect him of being a cretin and a killer, I would then surely be guilty of Anti-Johnism. But suppose there’s hard evidence that John is a serial killer and goes around murdering people. And suppose my suspicions/accusations are based on that evidence. Then, who is the real Anti-Johnist? Isn’t John the Killer the true Anti-Johnist because his actions have destroyed the Pro-Johnist position that John is a good guy who wouldn’t hurt a fly? Actions speak louder than words, or Actions SHOULD speak louder than words(though too often they don’t), and moral logic would place the burden of Anti-Johnism on John’s shoulders if he is the one who committed acts that betrayed the spirit of Pro-Johnism that contends that John is a jolly good fellow.

Then, the same logic applies to the matter of antisemitism. If our perceptions of Jewish wealth, power, influence, corruption, abuse, crimes, perfidy, and nastiness aren’t supported by evidence, then we would indeed be guilty of ‘antisemitism’, which is defined as irrational fantasizing and hyper-exaggeration of Jewish impact on society, much of it negative.
To clarify matters, let us consider the Eskimos. We know that Eskimos or Inuits have no power over us. They may be good at constructing igloos, walking on snowshoes, and lifting objects with their ears, but they have no control of the media, finance, Deep State, gambling, Hollywood, Military-Industrial Complex, pornography, music industry, real estate, law firms, universities, the courts, and etc. So, if we were to spread rumors about Eskimo power and its negative impact, we would indeed be delusional. We could be said to be Anti-Eskimoan, in this case defined as “Casting irrational and fantastical aspersions of power, influence, and problems on the Eskimo community.”

Now, if Jewish influence were on the level of Eskimos(or the Amish or West Virginia hillbillies), we could agree with those who sound the alarm on ‘antisemitism’. It’d be ludicrous to ascribe so much social, economic, and political influence to Jews when Jews are so feeble and ineffectual as a group. But seriously, are Jews comparable to Eskimos and the Amish? ROTFL.

Jewish Power is real, and it is vastly disproportionate to their share of the population. Jews are only 2% of Americans, but Jews are seriously over-represented in elite institutions, upper echelons of finance, top law firms, Ivy League universities, State Department, most influential think-tanks, Big Tech monopolies, uppermost courts, vice industries of gambling-drugs-and-pornography(which should be called E-Prostitution or Electronic Prostitution, very useful to Jews after they lost the business of pimping to the lowly blacks), Big Pharma(such as the sinister Sackler Family, the 21st century counterpart to the Jewish Sassoon Family that dominated the opium trade in China), and etc.

Now, Jewish Power isn’t necessarily evil or wicked. Power, like fire, can be used to do good or bad, and indeed, positive Jewish contributions to humanity in many fields such as medicine, arts & literature, philosophy, science, math, and etc. have been nothing less than astounding. Most human groups have been inconsequential, and only a handful have made a real difference, and Jews have been among the most consequential if not the most.

But among all consequential peoples, there’s been much bad as well as good. No one would say Romans were all bad or all good. No one would say the Chinese or Hindus, very consequential in Asia, were all good or all bad. Same goes for the British, French, Germans, and Arabs(who spread Islam). Great power is such that it can never be only good. Just like the Force in STAR WARS has a dark side, all forms of Great Power are open to abuse and exploitation, and all great peoples and empires have done their share of wicked things. Then, this would apply to Jews as well.

The concept of Antisemitism has moral validity if defined as follows: (1) Blaming Jews for just about everything, even for things they aren’t responsible (2) Noticing only the negative side of Jewishness and Jewish history without acknowledging the positives. But ‘antisemitism’ is not defined thus.

Rather, the mere noticing of Jewish Power is said to be ‘Anti-Semitic’. Criticism of Jewish power & influence and even the state of Israel is said to be ‘Anti-Semitic’. The notion that Jews have been bad as well as good is also ‘Anti-Semitic’. We are to believe Jews have always been noble innocent victims even when they were the villains, bad actors, or oppressors.

For example, Palestinians are accused of denying the right of Israel to exist while there’s hardly any mention that Israel was created as a denial of Palestine’s existence. We are bombarded with endless scare stories about how Iran is on the verge of getting nukes while ignoring Israel has 300 nukes(made from technology and materials stolen from the US), most of them aimed at Iran that could be wiped off the map by Zionist nuttery.
We are also to believe that Holocaust Holiness passes down through the generations(as if in accordance with Old Testament logic). So, even descendants of European Jews of the World War II period are entitled to reparations from the German government.

And it doesn’t matter how nasty Jews may be as individuals. Never mind what they do. The mere state of BEING Jewish means they are morally clean as a whistle. If a Jew spits in your face, you will be blamed for being unclean with saliva running down your chin. Jonathan Pollard was sprung from jail even though his treason led to the deaths of many. Jeffrey Epstein did come to a bad end, but the pervert-psychopath never faced true justice. And white-collar Jewish crooks can have their own luxury prisons whereas white goyim must be stuck in cells with Negroes who fuc* them in the arse.
Such social arrangement would suggest that Jewish Semites are now Supremites, or Supremacist-Semites who believe that they, as the Chosen People or Holy Holocaust people, are god-men over us and live as VIP with a separate set of rules that privilege their ilk uber alles.

In a way, it’s as if the world is divided between Jews & ‘Meta-Jews’ and Palestinians & ‘Meta-Palestinians’. Jews and ‘Meta-Jews'(or ‘Other Jews’) — groups favored by Jews, such as Homos/Trannies and American Negroes — are above the law and get special treatment… like Jussie Smollett who didn’t have to serve his sentence.
In contrast, white Americans and white Europeans are essentially the ‘Meta-Palestinians'(or ‘Other Palestinians’) as their future increasingly resembles the fate of Palestinians who were destroyed by dehumanization, deplatforming, unperson-ization, and mass-migration(of Jewish Zionist imperialist-immigrants). What is called ‘antisemitism’ in the current era is really Anti-Supremitism as those who call out on Jewish Power are not opposed to Jews or Jewishness per se but against Supremacist-Semitism or Supremitism.

Jewish obnoxiousness on this matter is made all the worse because Jews indulge in the kind of hysteria, paranoia, and lunacy they accuse others of. Jews complain that Jewish Power is exaggerated, but it’s the Jews who keep alive the fantasy that the KKK or Neo-Nazis have any power or influence in America. They do this by funding the SPLC and ADL that cook up mostly fake news about various KKK-sightings and incidents that turn out to be ‘hate hoaxes’.
The cleverer Jews use the terminological dragnet of ‘white supremacism’ in a generic way to corral just about every Donald Trump voter into the ‘Nazi’ camp. Jews insist that even expressions such as “It’s Okay to be White” and “Stop White Hate” are ‘white supremacist’ or ‘racist’.

Jews also use guilt-by-association(something they condemned during the ‘McCarthy Era’). So, since A is somehow connected to B who is connected to C who is connected to D who is connected to E, A must be in league with E. Using such a logic, it’d be too easy to connect anyone in the Democratic side with extremists and radicals. If anything, Barack Obama had direct ties to Bill Ayers, and powerful Liberal institutions did much to rehabilitate some of the worst scoundrels of 60s radicalism. Certain cop-killers were hidden by their radical associates for decades. And given Jewish-American ties with Neo-Nazi elements in Ukraine, one can easily connect many influential Jews with extremists in Kiev. And given Thomas Friedman’s close ties with Israel that has ties with ISIS, game of connect-the-dots can easily accuse Friedman of ties to terrorism.
Of course, invocation of principles doesn’t matter if you don’t have any power. Jews got the power, the megaphone for themselves and the mute-button for others, and they get to decide what is what… and too many people are sheeple and dummies to realize what is really happening.

The great irony of our era is that Jews, as the ‘New Nazis’, employ quasi-‘Anti-Semitic’ tropes against certain peoples who might as well be the ‘New Jews’. Jews do everything they accuse ‘Anti-Semites’ of doing to Jews. Notice how Jewish power often blames EVERYTHING on white goyim, the main scapegoat or ‘scapegoy’ for all that is wicked in the world. If something is wrong, blame white men, white women, white this, or white that. It’s as if whiteness is a disease and can only cured by extinction by non-breeding, race-mixing, or even murder(as in South Africa). Pathological Jewish Scholars push ‘whiteness studies’ that would have us believe that there is something innately sick or perverse about white identity and white consciousness.

Jews say it was wrong, even evil, for white Christians in the past to try to convert Jews, but Jews are hard at work converting whites to Political Correctness, ‘Wokeness’, Globo-Homomania(Queertianity as the new chrisianity), and white self-loathing as the only white virtue worth being proud of: “I’m proud of being ashamed of being white.”

But, it’s not just whites, of course, who bear the brunt of pathological Jewish ire. Jews also target Iran & Syria and spread all manner of hysteria, hatred, and paranoia on the basis of “Is it good for the Jews and Israel?” Scratch off the surface of any Jewish argument, and it comes down to “Is it good for Jews?”
Why is non-Jewish immigration bad for Israel? Because it would demographically erase the Jewish State. Why is mass-immigration good for Hungary? Don’t Hungarians have a right to preserve their territory and identity? No, because such a right for Hungarians would undermine Jewish Power to use divide-and-rule to take over Hungary. George Soros apparently wants to play Sith Lord around the world, and that is just wonderful to Jewish Power as Jews stick up for other Jews.

To understand the psychology of Jewish and Goy relations, imagine a meeting between Yahweh and the pagan gods. Suppose the pagan gods of various peoples and cultures want to meet Yahweh halfway and arrive at a compromise. Would Yahweh accept? No and why not? Because Yahweh believes Himself to be the one and only God, the one true God whereas all other gods are false gods or wicked idols that must be destroyed.

To the extent that the spiritual space constitutes the mental landscape of a people, we need to remind ourselves that the Jewish Mind is essentially Yahwehisitic. And this mental habit is alive and well even among secular atheist Jews whose obsession is Mono-Tribalism and Mono-Nationalism for Jews. Even secular Jews will accept the validity of identity, territory, and history for Jews Only. Jews reject poly-nationalism and poly-tribalism that argues that every people have a land, legacy, and lineage worth preserving. As far as Jews are concerned, Jews and only Jews are deserving of uniqueness.

In contrast, the goyim must be universalized in their worship of the Great Jews as Holy Holocaust neo-messiahs. Jewish body and blood are real. As for goyim, their identities are to be treated as baseball caps and t-shirts: Soulless objects, interchangeable and commodified. If white men controlled pornography and used Jewish women as sex meat for Arab men, how would Jews react? Jews would call it defamation and sexual imperialism. But Jews see nothing wrong with turning white women into sex meat to be traded. If anything, Jews will deem it evil for white men to demand that Jews stop trading in white women as white meat.
One thing for sure, Jewish Power is not to be trusted. Just remember the Russia Collusion hysteria spread by the Jewish control of media, academia, and Deep State.

Jews claim that Russia has historically been guilty of antisemitism, but Jewish anti-Russianism seems to be many times worse(and eternal). Also, Jews don’t believe in the middle ground or meeting people halfway. Alexander Solzhenitsyn, in his book TWO HUNDRED YEARS TOGETHER, called for both Russians and Jews to atone and bury the hatchet, but Jews have ignored the gesture because they want to own all the righteousness and dump all the blame on the Russkies whom they regard as subhumans who exist only to serve Jews. Like their God Yahweh who insists He and only He is the one true God, Jews must have it all.

Jews may pretend to compromise, but they’re always aiming to have it all eventually. They are always plotting for total control. This is where Anglo-Americans miscalculated and failed in their relation to Jews. They thought they could meet ascendant Jewish Power halfway, i.e. if declining Wasps welcome rising Bugs(Busy Urban Globalist Semites), then Jews would embrace Anglo-Americans as their bosom buddies. It’d be a win-win for both sides.
But, Jews didn’t see it that way; they were out to make themselves the New Masters and turn Wasps into their running dogs… and that is the state of the world today.

Russians learned the hard lesson in the 1990s. They hoped that Jews would act with honor and decency if given the reins over the economy, but Jews, whether Russian or American, conspired to take over just about everything and turn Russia into their fiefdom. The current Jewish hatred of Russia has little to do with past pogroms or Cossacks running wild. It’s because Russia managed to thwart the Jewish Plot to take total control. Jews today aren’t anxious about survival but obsessed with supremacism that they regard as their global right.

Of course, the Jewish War on Russia isn’t over, and it will never be over until Jews have it all. As long as Jewish Supremacism exists, it will seek to gain control of every part of the world, directly or indirectly. Just ask the Palestinians in the West Bank.
Jewish promotion of Globo-Homomania has one purpose: To weaken the moral and national integrity of every nation in favor of elite minority privilege. Homo elite-minorities in all nations hook up with elite-minority Jewish Power, especially as Jewish Power showers prizes on vain homos who choose to collaborate with Jews against their own national folks.

Jews, like white Europeans, have an adventurous spirit. When white man gazed upon the tallest mountain or the distant Moon, he didn’t give up the dream of conquest, no matter how impossible it seemed. No matter how long it took, he was going to fulfill the dream one way or another. But if whites lionized physical feats of courage and daring, the Jewish dream was always cerebral. Jews weren’t so excited about risking life and limb to accomplish the ‘impossible’. Unlike Anglos and such folks, they weren’t clamoring to climb mountains or make it to the North Pole.

Rather, they found witty ways to make other people do the bidding of Jews so that Jews could both keep their limbs and inherit the world. Consider the Wars for Israel. In the 1980s, who could have foreseen the events of the 1990s and the 21st century? But Jews pulled the strings of the media, finance, and government to make them happen. And Jews made OTHER peoples kill and die for the Jews. In the opening of the movie PATTON, the great general says that wars are not won by dying for one’s country but by making the other ‘poor dumb bastard’ die for his country. Jews got it even better: Jews win wars by making one bunch of poor dumb goy bastards slaughter another bunch of poor dumb goy bastards while they themselves rake in the dough and turn white women and Arab women into a bunch of whores. (Jews turned white women into sex toys for Jews and black men, and Wars for Israel have forced so many Arab women, especially Christians, into prostitution.)

Anyway, even if we play the rules of ‘Antisemitism’ as defined by Jews themselves, honest moral logic would suggest that Jews are the biggest ‘Anti-Semites’ because their actions provide ample evidence for those who notice patterns of Jewish power and influence that are increasingly abusive because, as they say, power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

If it is indeed ‘Anti-Semitic’ to say that Jews control the mass media, then Jews who DO control the mass media must be ‘Anti-Semites’ because they provide evidence for the perception of Jewish Media Control.
If it is indeed ‘Anti-Semitic’ to say that Jews control much of Wall Street, then Jews who DO control financial industries must be ‘Anti-Semites’ because they provide evidence for the perception of Jewish Money Control.
If it is indeed ‘Anti-Semitic’ to say that Jews control Silicon Valley, then Jews who DO control companies like Google and Facebook must be ‘Anti-Semites’ because they provide evidence for the perception of Jewish Big Tech Control.
If it is indeed ‘Anti-Semitic’ to say that Jews control pornography, then Jews who DO control the porn industry must be ‘Anti-Semites’ because they provide evidence for the perception of Jewish Porn Dominance.
If it is indeed ‘Anti-Semitic’ to say that Jews use their power to suppress freedom and liberty, then Jews who DO push for Censchwarzship must be ‘Anti-Semites’ because they provide evidence for the perception of Jewish Speech Control.
If it is indeed ‘Anti-Semitic’ to say that Jews control foreign policy, then Jews who DO control the State Department must be ‘Anti-Semites’ because they provide evidence for the perception of Israel-First Policy.
If it is indeed ‘Anti-Semitic’ to say that Jews corrupt public morals and spread degeneracy, then Jews who DO spread Homomania and Sexualization of children must be ‘Anti-Semites’ because they provide evidence for the perception of Jewish Moral Decrepitude.
If it is indeed ‘Anti-Semitic’ to say that Jews subvert Christianity & other spiritual-moral systems, then Jews who DO push ‘gay rainbows’ into Christian churches must be ‘Anti-Semites’ because they provide evidence for the perception of Jewish War on Christianity.
If it is indeed ‘Anti-Semitic’ to say that Jews commit genocide and wage wars, then Jews who DO oppress Palestinians & spread wars in Middle East & North Africa must be ‘Anti-Semites’ because they provide evidence for the perception of Jewish World Violence.
If it is indeed ‘Anti-Semitic’ to say that Jews seek to replace goy national populations, then Jews who DO push for mass immigration & great replacement must be ‘Anti-Semites’ because they provide evidence for the perception of Jewish strategy of demographic imperialism. (George Soros must be one helluva Anti-Semite for firing off so many ‘Anti-Semitic tropes’ all at once.)
If it is indeed ‘Anti-Semitic’ to say that Jews use their power to undermine the Second Amendment, then Jews who DO push for gun-banning must be ‘Anti-Semites’ because they provide evidence for the perception of Jewish Disarmament of goyim.
If it is indeed ‘Anti-Semitic’ to say that Jewish minorities in goy nations are more loyal to their own Tribe than to their fellow goy countrymen, then Jews who insist on Zionist & Jewish-First Policies must be ‘Anti-Semites’ because they provide evidence for the perception of Jewish In-Group Preference.

Consider US foreign policy. Is it equally fair to both Jews and Palestinians? And look how the mass media endlessly remind us about the ‘plight’ of Jews around the world while turning a blind eye to all the whites robbed, raped, and/or murdered by nonwhites.

In terms of what Jews DO, they are the biggest Anti-Semites because their policies and practices illustrate the vast, venal, and abusive power of Zion. Zionists complain that Israel is the victim of a double-standard that doesn’t apply to other Western Democracies, but this is more Jewish mendacity. Israel is fully supported by the US and EU despite its direct support of terrorism, illegal possession of nukes, occupation of the West Bank, and overt racial-supremacist ideology whereas all European ‘democracies'(more like ‘hegemocracies’) aren’t even allowed to defend their borders on the basis of identity, history, and territory.

Of course, the great irony is that Jews can insist that we pretend they have no power precisely because they got the most power. In history, Jews were sometimes the mouse trying to survive among elephants. Today, Jews are like the elephant that insists on being noticed as a mouse. The effect on society has been downright surreal. It gets even more surreal and twisted when so-called ‘Anti-Semitic Tropes’ are easily converted into Philosemitic Tributes via verbal trickery.

For instance, if you said Jews played a key role in pushing the ‘gay agenda’ sometime ago, you would have been smeared as an ‘Anti-Semitic conspiracy theorist’. But now that elevation of Homomania or Queertianity as the neo-religion of the West is considered fait accompli, there are now Jews who brag that their ilk had indeed done most to push the agenda. Jewish puppet Joe Biden said, yes of course, Jews did play the most important role in the triumph of the holy-and-wonderful ‘gay agenda’.

So, it’s thumbs up or down, ‘Philo-Semitic’ or ‘Anti-Semitic’, depending on one’s attitude toward Jews. If you say Jews control Hollywood and spread much filth, you’re a rabid and virulent ‘Anti-Semite’. But if you say Jews control Hollywood and deserve much praise for their ingenuity and enterprise, then you’re a wonderful Philo-Semite.
As nervous as Jews are about goyim discussing Jewish power, it’s permissible in some cases IF you praise Jews for their wise and wonderful use of their influence. Whether something is ‘Anti-Semitic’ or ‘Philo-Semitic’ also depends on who/whom and who-said-it. So, if Alan Dershowitz says that Jews indeed have lots of power and DESERVE TO HAVE IT, all is fine and well. But if someone like Kevin MacDonald notices the same power, he must be delusional and foaming at the mouth.

Granted, Jewishness always posed a great contradiction. Even as a mouse-people, they worshiped an elephant-sized God. In contrast, the pagan empires, even as elephant-powers, worshiped mouse-sized gods. Much of Jewish history is about a weak people with a strong God surrounded by strong peoples with weak gods. The Covenant is a powerful thing. In modern times, Jewish History has been about people with weak bodies but strong minds surrounded by peoples with strong bodies but weak minds. In the end, the mind wins over the body. Man controls horse, not vice versa. And all goyim need to be mindful of that.

Following the logic of today’s ‘Antisemitism’, Steven Pinker must be a rabid ‘Anti-Semite’ for noticing so much Jewish power, privilege, wealth, and representation:

Why Goyim Cannot Expect Jewish Elites to Tell Them the TRUTH — Jewish Elites Talk to Goyim Like Adults Talk to Children

 

When adults talk to children, do they always speak the truth? No. Even though children are taught the virtue of honesty, they’re deemed mentally and emotionally unfit to receive the truth and nothing but the truth. Of course, good adults try to be as truthful as possible, but they believe, with good reason, that children are too ‘innocent’ and/or immature to handle certain truths. A child who can believe in Santa Claus can be made to believe just about anything.
While lying-to-children is problematic, assuming adult faculties in children would be foolish. So, there are certain truths that we don’t share with children. And if children ask inconvenient questions, we resort to half-truths or explanations(or even concoct lies) that we feel to be appropriate at the moment. Only gradually do children mature into adults in their intellect and emotion. It’s been that way forever among humans all around the world.

However, the adult-children dynamic often exists even among adults or between groups of adults. Some groups feel more intelligent, more knowing, and more deserving of power/influence. They believe they know and understand more. Therefore, while they themselves can ‘handle the truth’, they believe other groups cannot. Such group dynamics can be along educational, class, racial, religious, or ethnic lines. Obviously, those who attended and/or work for elite institutions feel they are smarter, more capable, and more deserving of More Truth.

In contrast, the less intelligent, less informed, and less sophisticated are deemed undeserving of the raw and unfiltered truth. They must be fed the official line processed by the so-called ‘mainstream media’ which is an industrial complex of the Deep State and oligarchic corporations. So much of state documents are redacted and kept secret. And Big Media is as much about hiding, twisting, or spinning the news as investigating leads and disseminating the findings to the public. New York Times and such publications sometimes go the extra mile to expose secrets that the government wants suppressed, but more often than not, they cooperate with the Power to decide what the people should or shouldn’t be told. Often, much of their reporting is simply what they received from the government, with which they have special relations.

Furthermore, even when the Big Media exposes inconvenient secrets, they do so less for the public good or for truth-for-truth’s-sake than for partisan reasons. When MSM broke the Watergate scandal, it was working with elements of the Deep State to oust Richard Nixon. And when the MSM pushed the Russia-Russia-Russia Hysteria, or Russysteria, to discredit Donald Trump, it was in collusion with the globalist Deep State that feared populist-nationalism as a threat to their neo-imperial ambitions. The so-called Fourth Estate is less in service to the people than to the elites. Even when MSM spills the beans, it is less to inform the people than to manipulate mass opinions so that one elite faction can undermine another elite faction. It’s about using mass opinion to boost one elite faction against its rivals.

People in the MSM believe they must be the gatekeepers of truth, facts, and opinions. They believe there are too many lies, falsehoods, fabrications, and ‘conspiracy theories’ in the alternative news-sphere and online opinion world. To a large extent, they’re right about the innumerable cranks, charlatans, looneys, and nutjobs on the internet spreading half-truths, false rumors, and fake news.
And yet, it’s disingenuous for MSM to get on the high horse when it’s been guilty of the same failings and violations of ethics, and on a much bigger and more consequential scale. While so-called ‘liberal democracies’ offer more venues and outlets for news than totalitarian systems do, they are essentially ruled by oligarchies that are more concerned with power, prestige, and privilege than with truth, honesty, and integrity.

Elites have always regarded themselves as better and more deserving than the masses. They see themselves as the ‘adults in the room’ or the ‘best and the brightest’ and sneer at the masses as simpletons who ‘cannot handle the truth’. Still, even elitism could be fused with genuine idealism, i.e. elites must strive to know more, understand more, and responsibly craft news & opinions for the good of the people. They may be vain and conceited but also sincere in their goodwill toward the masses.
Such is usually the case when the social ‘adult-children’ dichotomy(one that takes place among adults) is along class-lines. The higher classes with better education feel they should make an effort to know more and have more power to do what is good for the lower classes, the hoi polloi. Such class dynamics have played out in the US, Russia, China, Iran, France, and etc. The CCP believes it knows what is good for the Chinese people. The Russian government guides the news and narrative for the national interest. The leaders of Iran think they know best and suppress certain truths while highlighting or even exaggerating others.

But when class snobbery combines with racial supremacism, the ‘adult-children’ dichotomy among adults becomes more problematic. Consider the Deep South where white elites considered blacks to be not only economic and cultural but racial inferiors. They believed the problem wasn’t merely that blacks had less education(if any) and knowledge but that blacks were innately less capable of thinking like adults. Blacks were regarded as childlike and naturally animal-primal in their emotions and thought-processes. As such, blacks could be told some truth but not all the truth, as they were deemed unfit to process or handle all of it. Besides, as blacks were bigger, stronger, and more aggressive, giving them the equal rights and freedoms could be dangerous to whites, elites and regular folks alike.

As history amply made clear, a lot of white fears and anxieties about free blacks with equal rights proved to be valid. Biologically, it’s true that blacks are less inhibited, less rational, more impulsive, and wilder. As such, blacks aren’t capable of handling the truth in the same way as whites. (That said, the bigger problem was that white elites were not honest among themselves about the threat posed by blacks. Abraham Lincoln was candid about the black problem and hoped for a permanent separation of the races by means of repatriation or creation of a black republic. If white elites had spoken the truth about blacks to one another loud-and-clear and spread the same message to the white masses, the race problem could have been brought to an end. Imagine if white elites had spread the following message far-and-wide-and-loud-and-clear: “Blacks evolved to be more muscular, more aggressive, bigger-donged, and more psychopathic. Without permanent separation, some may call for racial integration one of these days, and then blacks will destroy white manhood and conquer white women, and that will turn white guys into a bunch of ‘faggot-maggots’, spelling doom for the white race. Also, as an idol is worth a million individuals in prestige & fame and as idols in America are determined by athletic feats and musical prowess, blacks will likely dominate idolatry, and white boys and girls will effectively grow up worshiping Negroes as demigods.” If white elites had spoken such truths, most whites would surely have agreed for radical measures to bring about racial separation when the US was still a virile and healthy race-ist nation for white folks.)
Now, if blacks were smaller and weaker — like Gary Coleman or Emmanuel Lewis — , there would be less racial neuroticism. White Guilt about past wrongs done to blacks could afford to indulge a weak non-threatening race. It might be a stupid cult but wouldn’t be a complex. The current neuroticism is a racial complex because whites are instilled with collective guilt for a victim race(an object of sympathy) but also fearful of blacks as the thug-beast race. To complicate matters further, even as white guilt is premised on historical or systemic denial of racial equality to blacks, white addiction to Negrolatry is based on white adulation of perceived black superiority. Today, as blacks are tougher, louder, and stronger, white folks are now scared half to death to say anything that might trigger blacks into rage.

At any rate, even if white folks had good reasons to maintain an ‘adult-children’ dichotomy between themselves and blacks, many of their lies were self-serving. Worse, it’s often been the case that those who lie to control others often come to (half)believe those very lies, if only for emotional comfort. The ‘white lie’ can become the official myth.

In the current US, Jews and Goyim are like whites and blacks in the Deep South prior to the Civil Rights Movement. Just like white elites in the South felt they deserved to rule because they were better educated, more cultivated, and more civilized, many Jews feel they should rule because they are more intelligent, more engaged, more informed, and wiser.
Southern white elites were the ‘adults’, and blacks(and ‘white trash’) were the ‘children'(or chillun). Southern white elites were privy to certain truths whereas the blacks(and ‘white trash’) were fed simple narratives and fairytale-like myths… though in their vanity and self-aggrandizement, many Southern elites came to believe, at least in part, the myths peddled to the masses.
Historically, most of the elites have been occupied with money and/or politics and left it to OTHERS to define the Truth(or the shared myths); as the cultural elites mostly write books for the public and as the children of the elites also read these books, they too come under the same kind of manipulation, the kind that prints legend as fact.

The childlike masses are deemed undeserving of the whole truth, which they would surely misinterpret, mishandle, and mangle even if served on a silver platter, or so say the ‘adults in the room’. Therefore, the privilege of unrestricted truth must be reserved for the approved members of the elite, the kind of people who understand what is in the best interests of society.
It’s like what parents say to one another may be kept from the children. It’s like Movie Ratings forbid kids from watching R-rated movies without adult supervision. It’s like special archives that are accessible only to the credentialed. The rest of us must rely on MSM and public libraries. Even the internet doesn’t allow access to state secrets and the like.

Furthermore, monopolies like Google manipulate algorithms to favor Jewish-controlled ‘mainstream news’ over alternative sources that dare speak truth to power. Jewish globalists are like the Southern white elites in believing that they know best and deserve special access to knowledge denied to most people. The rest of us, being childlike and ‘dumb’, need to be spoon-fed what is ‘good’ for us. We need to be told what to believe and how to feel. After all, Jews are the ‘adults in the room’ while we are ‘children in the classroom’.

But then, there is a Catch-22 kind of logic to Jewish Power over us. Jews say, because we don’t know enough, we must be kept from knowing too much. But if we don’t know enough, shouldn’t we be encouraged to know more so that we may be deserving of the whole truth someday? If a child must be kept from the truth because his mind isn’t ready for it yet, then shouldn’t he be intellectually and emotionally prepared so that he will be ready in the future?
Then, the same logic should apply to adult goyim. If too many adult goyim are currently ill-informed and childlike, thus unqualified to handle truth and nothing but the truth, then shouldn’t they be instructed in the art of critical thinking so that they will be more knowledgeable and understanding of whatever the truth may be?
And yet, a Jewish Paradox comes into play to deny such possibility for growth among goyim. Notice how, over the years, our culture(even at elite levels) has gotten less adult and less critical, more infantile and more manipulative. Schools don’t teach kids how to think but what to think(which isn’t thinking at all) and what to feel.

Instead of leading us toward more knowledge and critical acumen to be deserving of More Truth, Jews say that because we don’t know enough, we should know even less! In other words, we might as well just give it up and entirely outsource our sense of history and the world to our Jewish Masters in the MSM, entertainment, academia, and Deep State deem as ‘acceptable’.
Not that those predisposed to genuine intellectual pursuit fare much better than the hoi polloi when it comes to the truth. Academia, as the ladder to the elite institutions, is such that the only chance of advancement is to never raise ‘inconvenient’ questions, which means critical inquiry is all but dead in many departments.
And the Jewish-controlled publishing media will usually reject anything worthy of real controversy. Their ‘controlled controversy’ is just another form of the official line packaged as ‘radical’ when it’s completely aligned with the agenda of the Jewish-run Deep State.
If the hoi polloi are too dumb for the truth and if the intellectually inclined are discouraged to think critically, where does that leave us? Indeed, isn’t it shocking that some of the most delusional, dogmatic, and stupid people are those with advanced college degrees. Consider the mania over gender-pronouns among the ‘well-educated’. All those years, they learned to swallow and regurgitate Political Correctness, not to think and raise questions.

For Jewish Supremacists, it’s not a matter of truth vs falsehood but ‘acceptable’ vs ‘unacceptable’, with their ilk deciding what is acceptable or not. For sure, the way Jews see goyim is worse than how adults see children. At the very least, adults expect children to eventually grow up and handle the truth. They also sincerely care about the children.
In contrast, Jews want goyim to remain stupid children forever, all the better to control them emotionally, politically, and ideologically. Jews do not want the stupid goyim to have agency or attain autonomy of mind. Jews don’t want goyim to find and explore their own truth. They are to decide what is ‘extreme’ or ‘hateful’ or ‘baseless’ or ‘meritless’. They get to say, we are to obey. Their attitude is like that of the pigs toward other animals in George Orwell’s ANIMAL FARM.

Now, if Jews were at least sincere in their commitment to truth and justice, their concerns would be more understandable. If the Jewish elites were truly moral and decent, we could understand why they would be concerned about young, impressionable, gullible, and/or boorish goyim falling under the sway of stupid Neo-Nazi or white-supremacist nonsense.
While I’m for freedom of speech and free exchange of ideas, who can deny that many young people have come under bad influence as the result of propaganda from both left and right, readily made more available via the internet? Whether one turns into a skinhead or an Antifa goon, obviously such a person is a stranger to thought: intellectually decrepit and emotionally crippled.

However, even as Jews feign concern for justice and truth, they themselves are arch-tribal-supremacists and full of hateful extremism. Also, they not only denounce white supremacism or some form of goy extremism but target for destruction any virile sign of white/goy consciousness lest it seek independence and liberation from Jewish Supremacism. Just ask the Palestinians about BDS.

Again, Jews as Master-Racists are similar to the white gentry of the Old South. Even as the white elites justified their privilege and control of narrative/myth as a means to maintain order and stability over black savages and ‘white trash’, they were trying to keep the power and wealth for themselves. They wanted permanent privilege on both racial and class grounds. They not only felt that blacks and ‘white trash’ weren’t, as yet, ready for the full truth but sought to maintain the existing power structure as long as possible. The lower elements deserved to know less because they knew less. Hardly any effort was made to urge the lower elements to know more so that they could know even more and eventually the whole truth.
But then, the white elites weren’t merely cunning and deceptive. Many of them came to believe in their own myths, if only to feel better about themselves. It was like getting high on one’s own supply.
In a way, even the elites were unwilling to face the whole truth as it implied an insurmountable burden of race relations, something with no solution in sight. Thereby, the best-seeming option was merely to preserve the order as long as possible, one which has now faded into history as the White South, rich and poor, no longer has any will to resist the coming transformation. But then, the new reality in the South isn’t about past falsehood finally being rectified with the truth but about one lie being supplanted by another.
As for the Jewish elites, they may be unwilling to face the whole truth as it portends a disturbing future for them as well. The danger isn’t the rise of Neo-Nazism but that Jews have become the very thing they’ve condemned about ‘antisemitism’. The current rulers not only forbid the Truth to the People but mutes it among themselves as well. Thus, we’re trapped in what Vladimir Putin characterized as the Empire of Lies. Falsehoods from high to low.

Especially pertaining to blacks, the white elites in the South believed that the differences weren’t merely a matter of education and cultivation but race and blood. Even though some of them did mouth platitudes about blacks gradually rising up to higher civilizational standards, they mostly wished that blacks would always remain ‘children’ vis-a-vis the white ‘adults’ who knew what was in the best interest of the Negroes.
Now, history has proven that blacks indeed do better in societies ruled by whites who are more intelligent and even-tempered; black-run societies have gone to pot, be it Haiti, Detroit, Zimbabwe, and etc.
And yet, such social dynamics, even if based on some degree of truth, were bound to be untenable in the long run because it demeaned black pride and betrayed American principles. While it seems factual that childlike blacks do fare better under whites in the role of ‘adults’, what people would choose to believe that they are best off serving as obedient ‘children’ under the guidance of another race?

It was especially tough for blacks to swallow because they are an intensely physical people who judge worth mainly in terms of who-can-whup-whose-ass? Because blacks ‘think’ so viscerally, they have a hard time accepting the fact that ‘faggoty-ass white boys’ are better than them in anything.
Now, if the white race was tougher, bigger, and stronger than blacks, then blacks would have less problem accepting the white race as the master race because black psycho-hierarchy gauges worth in terms of ass-whupping prowess.
Indeed, the main sense of racial injustice among blacks isn’t so much that they were enslaved by whites. It’s that they were enslaved by a weaker and wussier race. As such, blacks feel that THEY should have been the master race over the whites: THEY should have been kicking white boys’ ass and humping white women.

In contrast, the short brown people of Latin America have more or less regarded the bigger and taller white Conquistador elites as the rightful rulers. A similar dynamic pervaded the Aryan invasion of India and rule over the indigenous folks. Furthermore, the Aryans manipulated Hindu religion to ‘sacralize’ themselves as the more sacred class/race. By spiritualizing their power over the darker native folks, they made it a crime against the cosmos to challenge the existing social order.
In a way, Jews see eye-to-eye with the Hindus because they’re constructing a caste system in the US with themselves as the Holiest Race based on the combination of Covenant myth and Shoah cult. Jews push a kind of ‘Merito-karma’ that would have us believe that Jews, with their superior intelligence and wisdom, deserve to be at the very top. And as many elite and wanna-be-elite Americans are obsessed about IQ and status — despite their bogus PC noises to the otherwise — , they do look upon Jews as the super-brahmin caste.
Yet, not all Americans share in the conceit. White Nationalists, for instance, are more into aesthetics and beauty. While they believe Jews may be smarter, they believe whites are more attractive. And they believe that the white race has a right to preserve its beauty in white lands; as such, those most invested in the preservation of the white race and white beauty are most deserving to rule. This is why Jews see white beauty as something they must own, control, and commoditize. It must be turned from a racial preserve of the white race to a globalist product to be sold around the world by Jews. It’s also to be degraded via Jungle Fever and race-mixing.

 Video Link

While Jews may be smarter than white goyim, the Jewish-White dynamic is nevertheless markedly different from the White-Black dynamic. While we can understand how the ‘adult-children’ dynamic between whites and blacks was deeply offensive and hurtful to blacks(especially as it deemed whites to be racially more advanced than blacks), there is no denying that, without whites, blacks wouldn’t have modern civilization, or much civilization of any kind. Without whites, most blacks would be nothing but Jafro-Jivers chucking spears at hippos and running like mofos from lions or gorillas when not beating on bongo drums and shaking their booties. In contrast, despite higher Jewish intelligence and notable Jewish achievements, history has shown that whites can do just fine without Jews, indeed even better.

Paradoxically, higher Jewish achievements can be WORSE for white societies. Why? Because even though Jews use their high IQ for advancements in various fields, especially science, medicine, and technology, they use the profits not for the general good but to boost and reinforce Jewish Supremacism, and this entails the mental and emotional enslavement of the goy population.
Judeo-centrists will push any agenda or product, regardless of how harmful it may be to the general goy public, to strengthen themselves by weakening the Other. Take ACOWW or Afro-Colonization-of-White-Wombs. Why are Jews using the media, academia, entertainment, and advertising to push interracism, especially the kind where white wombs are colonized by black seed? It is to demolish white male pride and white unity. Jews seek to turn the goyim into mulatto-mestizo who are so confused in identity that they won’t be able to unite against Jewish supremacist power.
Furthermore, there is no guarantee that Jews will use their high IQ mainly for noble ends, such as finding cures for diseases or exploring deeper philosophical truths. A lot of Jews are smart but shallow, and all they care about is money, money, money, and like gangsters and crooks, they will use ANY MEANS at their disposal to rake in more cash… like Jordan Belfort and his fellow Jewish pranksters who were the basis for the film THE WOLF OF WALL STREET. Of course, Hollywood being Jewish, Martin Scorsese took care to de-Jewify the story somewhat, but it’s pretty obvious what it’s all about.

In some ways, Jews are justified in feeling like ‘adults’ over white goy ‘children’. Even though the differences between Jews and white goyim aren’t as stark as the differences between the white race and the black race — Jews are Caucasian like the Arabs and, like the Europeans, a people with a deep history of civilization and achievements — , Jews(at least the Ashkenazi ones) are thought to be smarter than whites on average(and indeed even by one standard deviation in IQ). Also, Jewish personality is wilier and more cunning, crafty, clever, sneaky, and shifty.
As such, Jews are more prone to be in the mind-game mode than whites are. Whites, especially those of Northern European stock, tend to be more obedient and one-dimensional in personality. In some ways, Jewish personality is to white personality what white personality is to East Asian personality. Jewish personality is more passive-aggressive, more multi-faceted.

Arguably, Jews had to develop such a shifty Zeligish personality as an adaptive mechanism in hostile goy societies. As a people who came to prominence with both prophecy and profiteering amongst various goy groups, Jews could never be just one thing. It’s like a salesman or a politician needs to have more of an adaptive personality than a farmer or truck driver. They must be chameleon-like; they must play different roles. Because Jews are more adept with multi-faceted personalities than white goyim are, they tend to look upon whites as overly earnest, trusting, or simple-minded.

By implication, whites can be made simple-mindedly anti-semitic or simply-mindedly philo-semitic. Whites can be made to go ‘full retard’ as either ‘nazis’ or ‘shabbos goyim’. Same is true of children. Children can be made to believe anything. They can be taught to be 100% Nazi or 100% Commie. Young ones can be made to believe in God or not believe in God. They can be made to believe in Santa or the Tooth Fairy. Boys can be made to believe they’re really ‘girls’ and vice versa.

The Jewish Mind thinks strategically at all times and never lowers the guard. It’s always on the lookout for the soft spot. It’s a house of games, like the title of David Mamet’s film. Jewish Mind is inseparable from Jewish Pride(as well as paranoia and resentment), and this makes Jews defiant.
So, it’s not easy for whites to convince or persuade Jews to go easier and make nice. Even when whites are decent and well-meaning in their interaction with Jews, the latter thinks, “What is the white goy REALLY after?” The Jew wonders, “Is the white goy trying to push his ‘truth’ onto me to control me?” Even if he realizes that the white goy is genuinely well-intentioned, he wonders, “Why is the white goy being SO DUMB and sharing his secret and/or dropping his guard when I can trick him and abuse him?” The Jew asks questions while the white goy seeks answers from the Jew who asks and answers to himself, “Why is this goy so dumb?” and “I have to exploit his stupidity.”

In a way, the Jew-Goy ‘adult-child’ dynamic is natural because it’s generally true that when a smart person is with a less-smart person, the former is more inquisitive whereas the latter is more trusting. The smarter person tries to figure out the ‘dummy’, whereas the less-smart person feels flattered to be in the presence of the ‘genius’ and gets oh-goshy.
Indeed, there are too many examples of uh-shucks-oh-goshiness among white goyim in the presence of Jews. Consider Charles Murray who wets his pants in the presence of Jewish Genius. Even Jared Taylor, though insulted, defamed, and excommunicated by Jews from social platforms and financial services, is always sucking up to Jews, deferring to them, and banning any criticism of Jewish Power & Israel on his site American Renaissance. The combination of higher IQ and wilier personality makes Jews feel more ‘adult’ in the presence of ‘childlike’ white goyim.

But of course, there is the added element of spiritual mythology and/or Holocaustianity. Among simpleminded Evangelicals, Jews are the original Chosen, the holy People of the Book. There was a time when Christianity said Jews killed Jesus and are stained forever with Christ’s blood(like Lady Macbeth), but the New Narrative blamed it all on the Romans, and most Christian pastors are the biggest cucks of Jews in the world.
For the secular goyim, there is the neo-spiritual faith in the Holy Holocaust that would have us believe no people suffered as much as the Jews and for NO GOOD REASON at all because, apparently according to the new historiography, Jews were pure-as-snow innocents all throughout history, and it was ALWAYS the goyim’s fault when Jews were met with animosity.
On the one hand, Jews denounce the superstitious-ness of goyim who were prone to BLAME THE JEW. And yet, we are to believe that all those goyim in all those places all throughout history just lost their minds and went totally cuckoo in the presence of totally innocent Jews.
So, who’s being superstitious? The real superstition is the Jewish Lie that Jews were always innocent and Goyim were always guilty. It’s statistically impossible that all throughout history, in all the outbreaks of violence between Jews and non-Jews, it was the Jews who were always innocent and it was the goyim who were always guilty.

Unfortunately, Jews tend to fall into two categories. What both have in common is self-worship but in different ways. One group believes that Jews are indeed pure-as-snow and always right and so goody-good, and therefore, it really must have been the fault of goyim. These Jews believe that the Tribe is holy because its members are morally superior to the rest of humanity. Such Jews are Moral Supremacists. They do believe in morality but are blind to Jewish immorality toward goyim and only see the ‘evil’ of hostile goy reactions to Jewish bad behavior. Even though they call for Jewish unity in pride and prestige — all Jews deserve to share in the achievements of great and good Jews — , they are the first ones to say that the behavior of bad Jews does not reflect on the Jewish community as a whole. So, when Jews act good, all Jews deserve to share in the pride of goodness. But when Jews act bad, it is ‘evil’ and ‘anti-semitic’ to notice certain patterns pertaining to Jewish ethnic tendencies. (Italian-Americans once tried to pull a similar stunt by demeaning anyone who noticed the prevalence of their kind in organized crime.) That said, the moral supremacist Jews do believe in some kind of code of ethics.

In contrast, the other kind of Jews, the Nihilist Supremacists, believe Jews are superior just because. In other words, Jews are better, superior, and more deserving simply because they are Jews, the ultimate Tribesmen. Jews are right even when they do wrong because… they are Jews. So, it doesn’t matter if Jews do good or Jews do bad. As Jews, they can do as they please to lord over goyim and exploit them. They have the mentality not unlike that of the hoodlums in GOODFELLAS. They regard themselves as the Made Men, and the Covenant gives them license to act as the World Mafia. To these types, the Covenant is purely ethnic and has nothing to do with God, whose existence they don’t believe. They’ve become the god.

While it’s inconceivable to imagine a social order in which all people are equally deserving of power and truth — even if such were offered to everyone, most people will likely reject power and truth in favor of escapism and comforting myths — , we must nevertheless strive for a society where most people are adult-like and demand to know more truth and handle more responsibility. People mustn’t be mindlessly trusting of the Power, and this goes for the US, Russia, Iran, Venezuela, India, and etc. There are no philosopher kings or wise-men among the ruling elites. Power has its own logic: Self-perpetuation by any means. Societies cannot do without the concentrations of power, wealth, and influence, but the people must insist on knowing more and asking tough questions. They must support a system of education, cultivation, and communication where people are encouraged to be more mature, rational, factual, and inquisitive. They need to be on the side of critical thinking, the will and courage to speak truth to power, or at least, ask truth of power.

Jewish Supremacists regard such as a threat. Why would they want people to think critically when, in the Current System, they are positioned as the ‘adults in the room’ while the goyim are relegated to ‘kindergarten’ status? Why would they want us to feel, think, and speak as adults when they prefer us to remain like children or cattle? This is why Jews push PC and worse ‘wokeness’ in schools at an early age. By pushing ‘anti-racism’, Jews seek to suppress white racial consciousness and identity. By pushing hysteria about ‘antisemitism’, Jews seek to suppress the truth that the reigning supremacist ideology of the West is Zionist tyranny over Palestinians, Wars for Israel, and nihilistic Jewish gangsterism throughout government & the economy.
Jews play it clever. They pretend to be ‘anti-racist’ by denouncing ‘racism’ but then shield Jewish ‘racism’ or racial supremacism by invoking ‘antisemitism’ to suppress criticism of Jewish monstrosity against Palestinians, Arabs, and Muslims. And of course, Jews push Globo-Homo on kids as early as possible in schools. Jews would have us adult ‘children’ believe that Homo-Mania is all about Human Rights and Justice when it’s really about inculcating toddlers with mindless worship of Minority Supremacism.
After all, kids aren’t merely taught that homos are born that way and do odd ‘sexual’ things. They are taught that homos and trannies are the holy ‘rainbow’ angels who deserve extra love and adoration. By making goyim worship homos as eternal minorities, Jews seek to condition goy minds to favor the minority-elite over the majority-norm. Sadly, the fact that SO MANY goyim have fallen for this shtick and even take their kids to libraries for reading sessions from drag-queen trannies goes to show there is some truth to the notion of Jews as ‘adults’ and goyim as ‘children’. Adults lead, children follow. Jews lead, goyim follow. Whites are so dumb.

This is a habit goyim must break free of. Goyim must not be like Charlie Kirk the cuck for whom ‘conservatism’ happens to be whatever Jews say it is. Kirk is more dog than human. He barks and rolls over accordingly. If Jews say NO WHITE IDENTITY, then Kirk says NO WHITE IDENTITY. If Jews say WHITES MUST SERVE JEWISH IDENTITY, then Kirk concurs and says WHITES MUST SERVE JEWISH IDENTITY. If Jews say ‘GAY MARRIAGE’ IS A CONSERVATIVE VALUE AND ‘LADY MAGA’ EPITOMIZES CONSERVATISM, then Charlie Cuck says the same. He really is a child. It could be he’s just an opportunist who says whatever to get a leg up in a Jewish-controlled system, but his childlike cuck-self really seems to believe in the ever-morphing ‘truth’ peddled by Jews who’ve taken control of Conservatism Inc. For such fools, truth is not a matter of WHAT but of WHOM. Truth is whatever that is insisted upon by Jews. So, if Jews say A is true, A is true. If Jews say B is true, then B is true. All that matters is WHO says it. If Jews(or one of their favored proxies) say it, it must be true.

While no genius, Kirk doesn’t seem like a retard either. So, why is he such a ‘child’, why is he such a dog? It’s because he has the emotions of an eight-year old who is so eager to please the ‘adults in the room’. Charlie Kirk the Cuck looks upon Jews as the holy ‘adult’ race and regards himself and fellow goyim as ‘children’ who must defer to the ‘grown-ups in the room and gain their approval’. It’s all so pathetic.

One of the most important projects among white goyim must be to create a culture of adulthood. There is a reason why adults are adults and children are children, but there is no good reason for a bunch of adults to remain childlike at the feet of other adults. It smacks of Oriental Despotism or Jerry-Springer-ism.
Individualism used to be a means by which Western Man stood out from the herd and stood up to think, feel, and act on his own. But over time, with the rise of Youth Culture and Pop Culture, individualism came to be degraded into mindless addiction to sensory overload via electronica that promoted impulsive behavior as being ‘liberated’. But liberated from what? Rational self-control, critical thought, skepticism, and restraint? It’s like a car being ‘liberated’ of its brakes. It will eventually go off the cliff. A truly free mind has control over both accelerator and brakes.
The use of individualism to rise above the herd, gain self-autonomy, and question the Power can be ennobling(and genuinely empowering), but individualism to self-indulge in drugs, sex, and lunacy at the expense of responsibility is no freedom at all. It is enslavement of the mind to the senses, but such is the kind of individualism pushed by Jews who control most media, entertainment, casinos, and drug industries.

In the end, Americans mustn’t rely on Trumpism because its brand of populism(like that of glutton Rush Limbaugh who gorged himself to death like a pig) ultimately infantilizes the populace with mindless slogans such as MAGA. That’s for the kids. The real adults should ask Trump, “If you’re so much about freedom and American nationalism, why do you keep sucking up to Jews who hate you and have done most to spread globalism around the world?”
Even though Ann Coulter has a long way to go, she was adult enough to ask tough questions of Trumpism once Trump became president. He promised the Wall. So, where was it? And Michelle Malkin took it upon herself to be more principled in challenging the bogus lies of Conservatism Inc with Charlie Kirks of the world as its fronts.
Adults must ask tough questions, not just chant slogans like childish tards at Trump-Chump rallies. In the crazy present, while adults are urged to become more infantile and childlike, children like Greta Thunberg are elevated to guru status.

In the Jewish-controlled world, illegal is legal, and legal is illegal; sin is virtue, and virtue is sin; and adults are children, and children are adults. And even though Jewish Power is the most murderous in the world, we must look upon Jews as helpless victims in need of protection. How many times have we heard that Oct 7 was the deadliest crime against Jews since the Holocaust. This from the same Tribe that was okay with Madeleine Albright saying it was ‘worth it’ to kill half a million Iraq kids. The same Tribe that watched gleefully as a Neocon-instigated war in Syria devoured 400,000 lives, a war in which Israel lent aid to ISIS terrorists. If you’re a true adult, go ask the Palestinians about the real nature of Jewish Power. And if Jews treat Palestinians that way, why would they treat you any better?

Perversely, goyim in elite circles and Deep State almost consider themselves as ersatz Jews. Even though they consider themselves not as ‘wise, worthy, and intelligent’ as the super-Jews, the holy race of geniuses and Shoah tragedy, they nevertheless see themselves as good enough to have attended elite schools and reached upper ranks of power where they get to rub shoulders with the super-Jews. Deep State is utterly Philo-Semitic in this manner.
Because they worship Jews and feel flattered to be working with and under Jews, there is a kind of ‘super-adult-and-adult’ dynamic between Jews and elite goyim. Jews are the ‘super-adults’ and elite goyim are ‘adults’. And the rest of us are mere ‘children’ who must be managed by goy elite ‘adults’ who defer to Jewish ‘super-adults’.

Because goy elites have access to the inner circles of power, they of course do know the truth of Jewish Power and Perfidy. And yet, as they were instilled with Jew-Worship from the cradle, they can’t think rationally about the Jews(and blacks and homos, two other groups Jews have ‘christened’ as especially holy).

Also, we must keep in mind that the kind of people who are most eager to reach the top are less interested in truth, honesty, and integrity than status, privilege, and power. Social climbers are really vain narcissists and nihilists at heart. They may flatter themselves that they want power and/or wealth for the higher/larger good, but it’s mostly a self-justifying myth.
Just like adults are often as foolish as children and believe in stupid things, there is no guarantee that the ‘adults in the room’, the so-called well-educated elites will favor truth, reason, and integrity over lies, cults, and mendacity. Most members of the elites won’t dare say something true or do something courageous IF it means loss of status and reputation among peers, most of whom are no less vain social-climbers and status-preeners.
This has always been the case with all peoples in all places at all times. So, even though it is generally true that the better-educated are more deserving to rule than the less-educated, it’s not a clear-cut case of the good-and-wise ruling over the bad-and-dumb. Rather, it’s fools with more education ruling over fools with less education. And for that reason, the elite justification for the suppression of truth is more often self-serving than for the common good.