Why the Holocaust Narrative must be turned on Its Head — Instead of the World Apologizing to Jews for Not Having Done Enough to Prevent the Evils of Nazism, Jews Need to Apologize to the World for Having Aroused Radical Teutonism that Not Only Killed Millions of Jews but Tens of Millions of Goyim

An essential necessity for the future well-being of mankind: The Holocaust Narrative must be turned on its head. It is most necessary because the biggest threat to world peace and justice is unrestrained Jewish Power that is now just as supremacist as Nazism was, if not more so. Like the Nazis who thought any number of Slavs and lesser folks were worth sacrificing for the creation of Greater Germany, powerful Jews feel any number of Arabs/Muslims and goyim in general may be sacrificed on the altar of "Is it GREAT for Jews?" (Apparently, "Is it GOOD for Jews?" is no longer good enough.) Of course, Nazism was overtly supremacist whereas Jewish Power is covertly supremacist, but if we appraise Jewish Power by its walk than its talk, it is undeniably in supremacist mode.
After all, it's actions that count, not words. If someone says he would never steal but steals, he's a thief. If someone says he didn't commit murder but did, he is a murderer. We need to bypass the 'sayology' and take a good hard look at the 'do-ology' of Jewish Power. Never mind what Jews say. Judge them by what they do.

Given the events of the past fifty years, one would have to be jaded, blind, or dishonest not to have noticed that Jews feel a single Jewish life is infinitely more precious than countless goy lives. It isn't just Madeleine Albright saying it was worth it to kill half a million Arab kids. Jews have pushed for various Wars for Israel in which countless Arabs and Muslims have been traumatized, displaced, maimed, or killed. And, many American soldiers have died or returned with broken bodies or souls; and the conscientious among them have to live with the fact that they took part in Jewish-Supremacist Imperialist ventures that destroyed entire nations.

But, Jews feel zero guilt and, if anything, feel justified because it was goyim sacrificed in the interests of Jews, the superior race. So, despite what they say about 'liberal democracy' and anti-supremacism, Jews are utterly supremacist in what they actually DO, and in the end, it is the doing, not the saying, that counts. (But with monopolistic control the media, Jews can hoodwink a lot of people. Too often, the Power of the Word > Reality of the World. So, even though Israel has hundreds of nukes aimed at other nations, the alarmism in the Western Media is about Iran getting nukes even though it hasn't a single one and US intelligence services have yet to prove Iran has a viable nuclear weapons program.) It is actually worse than that. If Jews preferred good Jews over bad goyim, that would be one thing. Even if they preferred good Jews over good goyim, that too would be somewhat understandable as many folks favor their own kind over others. Then, Jews would have some degree of moral credence. But based on what Jews really DO, it's evident Jews believe even BAD Jews are superior and possess souls/bodies more precious than those of GOOD goyim. A moralist favors the good of the other kind over the bad of his own kind. A tribalist favors the good of his own kind over the good of the other kind. A supremacist, in contrast, favors even the bad of his own kind over the good of the other kind. Who can deny that Jewish Power is now in the third mode, that of utter supremacism? How many Jews protest the pardoning of Jonathan Pollard by Barack Obama and Donald Trump? It was reported that the biggest funeral in Israel was for a Rabbi who said Jews are so superior to goyim that the latter exist like cattle to serve Jews. Apparently, even secular Jews who may not consciously think that way nevertheless FEEL that way given the character of Jewish-dominated domestic and foreign policies emanating from the US.

If we judge them by their actions, secular and 'liberal' Jews feel that even the lives of bad/guilty Jews are more precious than the lives of good/innocent goyim. The attitude is not unlike how we humans regard the animal world, i.e. we favor even bad humans over good animals. Even criminals have rights and are kept alive in prison whereas perfectly innocent animals are slaughtered for meat. If an animal kills a human, even when provoked, it faces extermination. But if a nasty human kills an innocent dog or cat, the punishment is relatively minor. If we judge Jews by what they do, they are supremacist.
SCHINDLER'S LIST quoted a piece of spiritual wisdom that goes like, "To save a single life is to save the world", but apparently, that single life must be Jewish. Jews really practice, "Better to save a single Jewish life than the world of filthy inferior goyim." How else can we explain all these pardons under Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump? Jews have been applying pressure to have some of the worst Jews go free, and Jews on both sides of the aisle are totally fine with this. Democrat Jew or Republican Jew, it all comes down to "We Jews are so special and superior that we are above the laws that apply to inferior goyim." So, even though many goyim who committed far lesser crimes rot in prison, some of the worst Jews that ever lived go free(and are soon making big fortunes again in the bosom of the Jewish community).
Jonathan Pollard sold US secrets to Israel which then traded them with the USSR, the arch-enemy of the US at the time. The information led to executions of scores of double-agents behind the Iron Curtain. So, Pollard wasn't only a spy and traitor but effectively a murderer as well. But Jews don't care. He goes free, and there is NO OUTRAGE among Jews. Obama set him free, and Trump(despite getting rump-humped by Jews) lets the bastard fly off to Israel. And Netanyahu greets and hails the traitor as a hero, and not a single US politician, general, or intelligence officer expressed any outrage, probably out of fear of being targeted by Jewish Power that operates like the mafia; even if Jews don't have you destroyed outright, they can pull all sorts of strings to prevent you from being promoted and favored within the Deep State because all goy politicians and operatives live in fear of being associated with anyone who dared to voice opposition to What-Jews-Want.

Even after the Pollard-Netanyahu stunt, we are told over and over by both parties that Israel is our greatest ally. Why not just say "Israel is our god", therefore whatever Jews do is sacrosanct and must be obeyed? When it comes to blind worship of all things Jewish, the US is hardly different from North Korea: Jews are Kim Jong-Un and the goyim are the mindless dogs. The sheer obeisance borne of fear, awe, sentimentality, and rapture on the part of goyim, from politicians to voters, is hardly distinguishable from the slavish servility of North Koreans toward their Supreme Leader.
Following victory in the Pacific War, US preached to the Japanese about liberty, rationalism, and rule of law and imposed a Liberal Democracy on those grounds. Japan was to reject Emperor Worship, Hirohito declared himself a man and not a god, and there would be no more of that atavistic attachments at odds with modernity. That was the US then, but now, the US is an insane, irrational, and quasi-spiritual metropole of blind worship of vile Jewish Power, vain globo-homo, and vicious black thuggery, one where the likes of George Floyd are spun into saints. Jews control the gods, and we must shut our eyes/ears and turn off our minds to any thought that goes against what the Jewish-controlled gods say. Americans worship Hirohitowitz

When Jews have done so much to bring down Donald Trump but his main priority is to curry favor with Jews by threatening Iran some more, pardoning a bunch of Jewish crooks, and letting Pollard fly off to Israel, the US is already 'North Korea' in the 'spiritual' sense. Jews own goy souls because Jews control the gods. If Jews really believe in what they SAY about human rights and liberal democracy, they would have expressed outrage over Jewish pressures upon Obama to pardon Pollard and upon Trump to let him move to Israel, the very nation that enabled the espionage. (On the other hand, as long as all US politicians repeat the mantra "Israel Is Our Greatest Ally" over and over, any espionage that benefits Israel cannot be treason, I guess.) But, there is only glib silence among Jews who are only too happy to see one of their own be released regardless of his crimes. Jews, 'right' or 'left', believe even a guilty lowlife Jew is more deserving of freedom & opportunity than any bunch of subhuman goyim.

Consider the Jewish historiography about the so-called Red Scare. What was it a reaction to? It was to expose the many communist spies embedded in various US departments. Some Jews even sent nuclear weapon secrets to mass killer Josef Stalin, the arch-communist who'd grabbed all of Eastern Europe after World War II. But notice the MAIN THEME about the era is not about what those Jewish traitors and spies did but what Joe McCarthy did. So, never mind widespread Jewish treachery in service of a communist mass killer. Just focus on how McCarthy prevented some people from working in Hollywood for a several years. Of course, Jews were especially offended because a good number of blacklisted writers and directors were Jewish. Some Jews being blacklisted for their communist ties or sympathies is a bigger outrage than Jewish traitors spying for mass killer Stalin.
Furthermore, the pseudo-tragedy of the Hollywood blacklist and etc. got far more historical attention and condemnation than the far greater injustice of over 100,000 Japanese-in-America dispossessed and 'interned' during World War II. (One wonders if Jews supported US government reparations to the Japanese-Americans because they grabbed much of the confiscated wealth. Without the government paying off the Japanese-Americans, Jews might have been sued to return the properties.) And how did ADL get started? Jews felt a Jewish rapist-murderer's life was too precious for goy justice. Why should a Jew die for raping and killing a subhuman goy girl? To the Jewish mind, a Jew facing goy justice is like a man being tried by apes. Jews even used pressure to have Nathan Leopold sprung from jail despite his horrid crime. He was sentenced to life in prison and 99 yrs for kidnapping, but he was released during his lifetime. And of course, Jews have done everything to ensure Roman Polanski remains free despite his vile crime.

Cold-blooded Nathan Leopold who got lifetime sentence and 99 yrs but was sprung from jail in his lifetime. It's good to be Jewish.

If we judge Jews by what they DO, they are totally supremacist and believe Jews are God's or History's MADE MEN who should be above the law, at least vis-a-vis goyim. Jews think a Jew killing a goy is like a man killing an animal. The punishment shouldn't be too harsh as a superior being killed an inferior being. Goyim in this equation are rather like blacks on the Southern Plantation where a white killing a black wasn't as bad as a white killing a white(and of course a black killing a white).
The New Slavery is invisible to most people because it's not based on goyim being denied the Rule of Law but on Jews being Above the Law. There are two forms of slavery: One is where some are denied the Rule of Law, and the Other is where some are not bound by the rule of law. So, even though we are not slaves in the technical sense, we are bound by the Rule of Law whereas Jews are Above the Law(or they rule the law). This arrangement effectively turns us into slaves of Jews because WE must obey the rules whereas the Jews and their allies do not. In 2020, why were Antifa and BLM able to run riot and loot and burn? Because they had the blessing/protection of Jews & the Jewish-controlled Deep State, they could do the violent bidding of Jews hellbent on getting rid of Trump and punishing America for having elected him(and for daring to re-elect him). James Field, whose crime was infinitely less grave than what Jonathan Pollard did, will rot in prison forever.

If blacks in the past wanted to be equal under the law, Jews want to be above the law. (Of course, blacks today want what Jews got and are no longer interested in equality under the law. Fish rots from the head, and Jewish above-the-law-ism has infected the mega-egos of homos and blacks as well.) In a sense, slavery is relative. Even if no one is technically a slave in the classic sense, the system is essentially a slave state IF some people are NOT bound by laws that apply to the rest. If I get to cheat, steal, and murder but am not judged like everyone else under the law, I'm essentially a master over others. Of course, some Jews do end up in prison, but how long did it take for Bernie Madoff to finally get caught? And he was offered as scapegoat only to deflect public view from similar crookedness by Wall Street on a far larger scale. And how long did it take for Harvey Weinstein to finally meet some justice? (And how long before he is pardoned too?) And why did Jeffrey Epstein get so many sweetheart deals before he finally got locked up for real. And what really happened in his prison cell? And why aren't journalists pursuing these questions? But then, why would they? Many are Jewish, and even non-Jewish ones work for Jewish owned corporations.

Relativity of freedom posits that the Rule of Law is liberating and empowering IF everyone is bound by the law. So, for those who are not protected by the Rule of Law, it is a step up IF they too gain the protection. It doesn't mean they get to do as they please, but it means the system will protect them from those who dare to do as they please. Rule of Law is like a key for everyone to the door of justice. However, in an order where some are allowed to be Above the Law, the Rule of Law becomes repressive and enslaving. It becomes a chain. Why should people be bound and tied to the Law when others are allowed to do as they please and not only not be punished but rewarded?

Paradoxically, Jewish Evil flows from (the cult of) Jewish Sainthood, the Holocaust Narrative. The Narrative would have us believe that because Jews suffered so horribly at the hands of the most evil regime(and its many collaborators) that ever existed, they must be noble, holy, and totally innocent. After all, Evil attacks the Good, and if the Nazis were the most evil people that ever existed, they surely went after the most wonderful, wise, and noble people that ever lived. So, as the Holocaust Narrative says Jews are so good(and as Jews have bought into their own myth), whatever they do must be good or at least forgivable whereas anyone who condemns or criticizes Jews must be evil... because only 'nazis' would hate such a good people. So, even though the true lesson of the Shoah should be anti-supremacism, it has only cleared the way for Jewish moral supremacism that justifies whatever Jews do.

Now, if Jews were a powerless or middling people, such conceits wouldn't be so dangerous. But when Jews are the most powerful people in the US(therefore the world), it poses a grave danger to humanity to have such a people dominate the US as the lone superpower. And this is why we need to revisit and revise the Holocaust Narrative for the good of both Jews and ourselves because the Holocaust Card has become a get-out-of-prison license for Jews regardless of what they do.

And for that reason, it is important that we try to turn the Holocaust Narrative on its head. No, don't be like lunatic deniers and say it didn't happen or Jewish deaths were all just an accident. Even if the 6 million number is surely bogus, there was a Plan and millions of Jews perished(though I'd guess many Jews died like goyim caught up in the war than exterminated by the Nazis; when bombs fall, they don't discriminate between Jew and Goy). We need to reject the deniers and instead put the Shoah in a more meaningful context. It would be monstrous to say the Jews deserved it, but it'd also be foolish to say Jews were white-as-snow innocent angels who were set upon for no reason by crazy lunatics who just hallucinated the evils of Jewish power, influence, and activities. The Shoah was an extreme backlash that went off the rails, but it was an evil reaction to very real Jewish evils. (Evil can clash with Evil, as in the war between the Nazis and Commies in WWII. Fighting the Other Evil doesn't make your side Good.) Also, given the Jewish roles in the events that led up to WWII, one could argue Jews were more deserving of the horror than many groups in the 20th century who got smashed to pieces for no fault on their part. Any Central/Eastern European nation/people that happened to be located between Nazi Germany and Commie Russia got crushed in WWII. They were like innocent mice caught between two raging elephants. Or, consider the fate of Laos and Cambodia that suffered horribly because they happened to be 'caught between' North Vietnam and the US. Vietnamese used their territories to reach South Vietnam, and the US dropped tons of bombs on them, weakening the ruling regimes and driving many to the communists. The peoples of Laos and Cambodia had nothing to do with the global forces that led to the Cold War, but so many got ground to dust.

But Jews were different. Jews played a decisive role in the events and developments that led to World War II that killed many more goyim than Jews(though Jews may have died the most in per capita terms, though one could argue the Ukrainians got it worse in the 20th Century because they were mass-killed by Bolsheviks & radical Jews, destroyed by Nazi Germany, and then punitively crushed by Soviets for collaboration). Jews usually blame not only Germany but other nations as well. They say the entire civilized world bears guilt one way or another. European nations were guilty of either neutrality or allying with Nazi Germany. And too many ordinary European collaborated with the Germans in rounding up Jews. And Russia was guilty of the Nazi-Soviet Pact. US and UK were guilty of dragging their feet to fight the Nazis, and they didn't sufficiently bomb the railroads used for shipping Jews to death camps. So, most goyim were either killers, collaborators, cowards, feet-draggers, or simply didn't care enough. So, by varying degrees, all goyim are guilty for what happened to the Jews. So, all the world must get on their knees and pray and pay, offer hollers and dollars. Some have to pay more, with rich Germany at the top of the list. But UK and US must also pay because they didn't do enough. And besides, Jews argue that the Shoah was more-or-less a culmination of the entire history of antisemitism in Europe. So, ALL OF WESTERN HISTORY must atone for its crimes against Jews.

But, that is only one way to look at it. But there are other ways to connect the dots.

Another way is to demand that Jews feel some guilt toward all humanity for their prominent role in the events and developments that led to crises that finally exploded in World War II and destroyed so many people, mostly goyim. Jews should look in the mirror and take a honest assessment of their place in history. It's like Japanese are right to mourn what happened in the firebombings of Tokyo and the nukings of Hiroshima/Nagasaki, but those horrors didn't just happen because the US decided to go bat-shit crazy and cross the Pacific to kill whole lot of 'Japs' for the hell of it. Granted, the US should look in the mirror and realize it too played a role in the developments that led to the Pacific War. After all, it had been US and UK that emboldened Japanese imperialism as leverage against Imperial Russia and counterweight to slowly-but-surely waking China. It was disingenuous for the US to enable Japanese Imperialism in Asia and then suddenly pull out the rug and play the good guy opposed to imperialism. (After WWII, the US aided French Imperialism against the Viet Minh.)

While it'd be absurd and cruel to blame ONLY JEWS for the events that led to WWII, one could make a solid case that the war and its horrors would not have taken place IF Jews had been less radical, irresponsible, greedy, and arrogant(and so utterly lacking in self-awareness, not least by projecting their pathologies onto others).

First, there was the Jewish role in the communist putsch in the Soviet Union. Also, most communist movements in Germany and Eastern Europe were led by Jews. Why did Jews have to push something so radical? Moderate socialism was gaining ground in Europe. Even conservative elites accepted some degree of socialism as compromise with the working classes. Many Christian groups believed socialism is more aligned with Jesus' teachings than capitalism is. People like Bismarck had negotiated with socialists. But communists were different. They were for radical violence, and their vision frightened the bourgeoisie and the old order; it even alienated much of the goy working class that wanted better pay and conditions, not tyranny under a radical regime. Would fascist and other hard-rightist movements come to power in Italy, Germany, and other nations IF NOT for the threat of communism and other forms of radicalism in which Jews were prominent, either as activists or theorists?

Besides, this fear wasn't just some fantasy cooked up by the 'far right'. Communists in the USSR pioneered modern totalitarianism and mass terror on an unprecedented scale. Jews were vastly over-represented in the secret police and rounded up countless people. Millions ended up dead in gulags or by summary execution. Many were tortured and traumatized for life. All property and wealth were looted by the state. And Christians fared especially badly at the hands of communists, and Jews played a big part in this bloody orgy. 50,000 churches were destroyed in the USSR. So much of culture and tradition was wiped off the map. In time, the word of these tragedies reached the West and drove many Christians to the right against the left, indeed even the far-right because the far-left in the USSR showed what it was capable of. Who could deny that Jews played a huge role in communism? The failed German communist putsch was led by Jews. If it hadn't been for the threat posed by communism, would Europe have fallen under fascist and hard-right dictatorships? It certainly would have been less likely. While Jews were not the only monsters of far-left radicalism, they played a key role that alienated so many goyim and hardened their hearts to Jewish suffering later.

But it wasn't just the Jewish radicals of the far-left who made things worse for themselves and mankind. It was Jewish capitalists and cultural perverts, especially in Germany following World War I. Germany had just gone through the ordeal of war and faced massive challenges of rebuilding the economy and creating a whole new political order. The Versailles Treaty had already made things very difficult, and national tensions were bound to be high as certain territories with German-majority populations were handed over to Poland and Czech nation.

Still, most Germans swallowed their pride and bore the brunt of post-war hardships and supported the new republic. During this most crucial time, Jews could have played a constructive, healthy, and patriotic role. But what did so many Jews do? They took advantage of German weakness and worked with International Jewry to financially fleece Germany and pick it to its bones. Just when Jews had a great opportunity to show themselves to be good patriots and fellow-citizens, they took advantage of German weakness to rig financial institutions and make off like bandits while the bulk of the German population saw their lifetimes savings wiped out overnight by hyper-inflation.
But there was even more, indeed as if the worst among the Jewish population simply couldn't resist showing their true colors. For a nation in dire straits, the best remedy is morality, unity, and sobriety in culture and values. The US in the throes of the Great Depression got culturally more sober and conservative. (If, by the time FDR took office, the US had been in deep depression for three years, Germany had been in a depression for fifteen years when Hitler took power in the same year. Naturally, the German solution turned out to be far more radical, as well as vengeful, than the American one. The Jazz Age happened in the US when the times were good. In contrast, something far more decadent and downright degenerate befell Weimar Germany during a Depression that was far worse than anything that hit America.) But, just when Germans were most desperate and destitute, Jews led the way in promoting the very worst of soul-befouling Weimar Culture. While Weimar Period was not without cultural ferment and genuine achievement in modernism, much of it was sick, grotesque, demented, and pathological.

Worse, the timing was all wrong. In the real estate business, there's a saying, "Location, Location, Location". In history, it's "Timing, Timing, Timing". Much of Weimar Culture was the last thing Germans needed at the time. When a people who'd been defeated, humiliated, and dispossessed couldn't help but notice that Jews were among the biggest spreaders of cultural pollution, why should anyone be surprised that it led to a massive anti-Jewish backlash? (In the US, Japanese-Americans had nothing to do with Pearl Harbor, but the lot of them were dispossessed and packed off to internment camps. In contrast, Jews of various stripes — radical leftists, financial sharks, organized criminals, and cultural perverts — had played leading roles in the degradations of the Weimar Period. If angry democratic Americans could do such a thing to an innocent population, is it surprising that Germans reacted far more extremely against Jews whose actions had really caused harm to Germany and Europe via financial thievery, radical ruthlessness, and cultural degeneracy?) Such fury at capitalist decadence was certainly not limited to the Far Right. The Communists also railed against the self-indulgent Decadents when so many fellow nationals were suffering. Indeed, Jewish Leftists themselves denounced the greedy elites and the bourgeoisie for their oysters, champagne, and parties while The People couldn't find work. Consider the films of Sergei Eisenstein and other radical Jewish directors who depicted the elites as either corrupt aristocrats or greedy capitalists reveling in pleasure and piggery while the people had no bread.

Then, why should it be surprising that the National Socialists would score big with a similar narrative because, after all, Jews in particular fared far better than your average German during the Weimar Years? Jews were not only over-represented among the bourgeoisie but in the financial sector that was more parasitic and vulnerable to rigging. Furthermore, rich Jews were culturally more 'liberal' than most goy members of the bourgeoisie who, furthermore, were more involved in making things than manipulating currency.
As Karl Marx had already stated in the 19th Century, capitalism brings out the worst in Jews; but then, did Marx know that communism would also bring out the worst in Jews in another way. Either way, Jews gained tremendous power and/or wealth at the expense of goyim in both Soviet Russia and Weimar Germany. No wonder both Stalin and Hitler thought something had to be done. Communists didn't name the Jew, but the heavily Jewish Trotskyite elements were purged. In Germany, the Jew was named, but unfortunately not only for which they were responsible but just about everything. (It is in this regard that Hitler's view of Jews was, in more ways than one, a counterpart of Jewish view of goyim. After all, Jews aren't content to blame only the Germans of the National Socialist Era for what befell the Jews. Instead, many Jewish scholars have argued that Germans have long had dark souls, especially about Jews, and this pathology finally erupted in WWII, i.e. there was Evil Incarnate in the German soul, history, and/or culture. Jews went even farther and argued that ALL of European History was somehow responsible for the Shoah, which was no accident but the inevitable culmination of the sickness at the heart of Western Civilization. In other words, European-Christian Civilization, given its innate evil, was predestined to commit such a crime against the wise and noble Jews. And of course, Jews have gone even beyond that in the current West where whiteness has been made synonymous with deviltry. While Jewish rhetoric isn't exactly eliminationist so far, it is certainly 'humiliationist' and 'dissolutionist', i.e. the only way whites can be good is by groveling before Jews and their favored allies and, furthermore, offering white wombs to create black babies than white ones. In a similar vein, Hitler was convinced that the Jewish Problem went far beyond what rotten things the Jews did in his time. Jewish role in bloody radicalism, financial looting, and cultural degeneracy were all manifestations of a deeper sickness of the Jewish soul, one that could be resolved preferably by expulsion from European lands or, if push came to shove, eliminationist means. Hitler vs the Jews was a war of one supremacism vs another, both with an over-arching theory as to why the other side is so cursed that it must be defeated, humiliated, and, if need be, eliminated.)

If Jewish radicals said to goy masses, "You suffer because the piggy elites exploit you and party all night long; therefore, rise up and destroy them", it's hardly surprising that 'Anti-Semites' resorted to similar tactics: "You live in misery because Jews rob you and corrupt you; rise up and take back what's yours." (These days, Jews suppress not only racial politics but class politics among whites. Racial politics are okay only if directed against whites and sometimes at Arabs. There was a time when a good number of Jews belonged among the working class or hungry scholars and felt betrayed by capitalism that appeared to favor an alliance of rich Jews and rich goyim at the expense of All-Jew-Unity. No wonder they turned to socialism or communism, even against Jewish capitalists who seemed eager to assimilate to gain status than stick loyally with the Tribe. But now, with so many Jews being super-rich, rich, or affluent in the US and, furthermore, due to All-Jew-Unity premised on Zionism and Pride of Hegemony among all within the Tribe, most Jews are agreed that the best way forward is the formula of Jewish tribalism, supremacism, and capitalism to be shielded by a rebranded 'left' that poses as 'radical' but really serves to promote globo-homo and protect the vast wealth and privilege of Jews. Jews got burned by National Socialism but also lost out under communism in the long run, and so, Jews have decided to bury both racial politics and class politics among the white population. No wonder Bernie Sanders took a dive against Hillary and Joe Biden. He didn't really want to win because he's a Jew first and 'socialist' second. Better to have a goy toy as total puppet of Jewish Power than be put in a position where he is expected to choose socialism over tribalism.) If Jews hadn't acted the way they did after World War I, there would have been far less likelihood of National Socialism gaining power. After all, the two major European countries that were deemed 'most notoriously antisemitic' were Russia and France, not Germany, where Jews had generally fared better in the 19th century, especially under Bismarck.

Then, why did so many Germans come to hate Jews in the interwar period? Just when Germans were trying to climb out of the purgatory of history, too many Jews acted like capitalist pigs, radical nuts, or cultural psychos. The program of the Jewish Left was no consolation as it alienated the majority of Germans. Communism, while claiming to be for social justice, had already reared its ugly head in Russia. If Jewish degenerates degraded culture with filth, Jewish communists waged a different kind of culture war to create the New Man. Too many Jews robbed Germany, and too many Jews polluted the culture, dominated organized crime, and vices of all kinds. And the 'social justice' Jews on the Left seemed more obsessed with power and control than in tune with the values of most Germans.

Because Jews, in all their egotism and ethnocentrism, never seem to own up to their injustices done to goyim, repeated the same thing all over again in Russia of the 1990s, which paved the way for Vladimir Putin who thankfully is no Hitler. But Jews, with megalomaniacal neurosis to match that of the HAL-9000 computer, admit to no faults of their own and just insist Putin is New Hitler and it was entirely Russia's fault that the 'reforms' didn't pan out in the 1990's. Never mind what Russian Jews did, and not with just a little collusion from World Jewry centered in the US. Jews are so full of themselves as wiser, smarter, and superior that they're deathly afraid of admitting wrong, especially to inferior goyim.

It's like the pride of authority that adults have in relation to children. Even when the adults are clearly in the wrong, they're loathe to admit as much because it would not only expose a fault but erode their aura of respect and authority. Whether parent or teacher, his authority over children rests on the shared perception that he knows best and they must take orders from him. Greater the arrogance of authority, bigger the anxiety of authority. The more a figure of authority denies fallibility, the more he fears being proven wrong. It's no wonder HAL-9000 computer takes extreme measures to wipe out all evidence that it may have been wrong. Jewish Power is now this way. Jews believe themselves to be not only smarter and not only wiser but pretty much all-knowing.

They also believe themselves to be holier and entitled to unconditional sympathy because of 'Muh Holocaust', which is remembered less as a mass killing of a people than the mass-murder of gods, with every Jew being a little jesus; in other words, European Christians are the real christ-killers since every Jew is like a little christ and 6 million of them were killed. Combination of super-arrogance and super-anxiety has made Jews virtually incapable of admitting wrong and arriving at a sounder power arrangement with other groups. They are right even when wrong, and you better believe it. So, the very Neocons who pushed for the Iraq War are still going strong in the institutions, the very crooks who brought about the financial meltdown are still raking in billions on Wall Street, and Jonathan Pollard isn't just a free man but a HERO in Israel, America's Greatest Ally.
So, since Jews are never wrong, if the world is becoming a more dangerous place, the fault is entirely with the world of goyim than anything Jews may have done. In the case of Russia, if Jews had sense, they would be thankful that Putin is no Russian Hitler and, if anything, has been good to Jews who've supported his regime. But Jews got super-egos and must have everything their way. Because Putin isn't a total whore to Jewish Power, he must be targeted for destruction.

If it weren't for Jewish radicalism(and the Bolshevik horrors in the USSR) that horrified the capitalists & conservatives(and even some liberals), Jewish finance capitalism that robbed Germany and left so many destitute, and Jewish cultural pollution that repelled so many Germans in search of moral and spiritual guidance in hard times, it is highly unlikely that Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist Party would have amounted to much, let alone come to power. Even though Hitler among others over-stated the case of Jewish Evil, much of what they said had more than a kernel of truth for many Germans who'd witnessed and/or experienced various evils of the Weimar Period stemming from Jewish perfidy. Also, most Christian Churches and organizations would not have warmed up to Neo-Pagan National Socialism but for the fact that they came to associate Jews with Godless communism that butchered countless Christians in Russia and with Weimar degradation that turned culture into a cesspool.

True, Italian Fascism came to power BEFORE National Socialism, but Benito Mussolini was not particularly anti-Jewish and his movement was hardly a world-shaker. Besides, Mussolini initially expressed loathing for Hitler and formed an alliance with Germany only when it emerged as the indisputable strong horse in Europe. Though Hitler took some inspiration from Italian Fascism, it was not the main catalyst for National Socialism's eventual triumph in Germany. It was the Depression and the failed democracy. The Depression was made far worse by Jewish financial predation on the economy, and the democratic project could hardly thrive in a culture of dissipation brought upon by degeneracy. As Jews played a key role in the deprivations and degradations of Weimar Germany, they deserve much, if not all, the blame for the rise of National Socialism.

While National Socialism was the last thing the Jews wanted, Jewish behavior made its rise almost inevitable. It's like the last thing a homo wants is AIDS but if he keeps getting rammed up the ass, he's likely to get it. The last thing a criminal wants is to be arrested, but if he keeps stealing he'll end up behind bars. The Nazis proved to be the bad cops of history, indeed arch-criminals to boot, but the rise of the Nazis was in large measure a reaction to Jewish venality. Now, it may well be that the majority of middle class German Jews were decent folks, but then, power is always defined by the elites, and Jewish elites of money, culture, and politics gave a terrible account of themselves that affected goyim's perception of the Jewish community in general. Fair or not, people were apt to think, "If most Jews are good, why don't they do something about the bad ones? Because they agree with the bad Jews!" Or maybe most Jews weren't so bad but supportive of bad Jews out of pride of tribal power and influence. It's like many Germans who weren't particularly keen on Hitler nevertheless supported him as the champion of German restoration and pride. It's like most white Southerners didn't own slaves and had no role in the slave trade, but the decisions of the elites tainted all the American South, just like the decisions of the Japanese elites in WWII led to ruination of the whole populace. Elites matter. When the elites stink, all the people suffer.

Ironically, despite National Socialism's antipathy toward Jews, its success depended on insane levels of Jewish Perfidy. Likewise, Jewish evils in 90s Russia paved the way for Putin and his gang. Jewish Evil is the manure that fertilizes the growth of 'antisemitism' and SJPH, or Stuff Jewish People Hate. Had Jews acted responsibly in Russia of the 1990s, maybe a working democracy and economic system would have sprouted on Russian soil, and it would have gone a long way to build trust and confidence between Russians and Jews. But no, Jews simply couldn't resist raping the entire economy down to the last kitchen sink. Their tribal arrogance and personal egotism, plus their bottomless contempt for dumb drunken Slavs, made it nearly impossible for Jews to hold themselves back, any more than Dracula could at the sight of blood. And what are Jews trying to do today around the world? Spreading globo-homo pornographics as the new faith and the looting of entire national economies.

At any rate, Jews didn't just ruin it for themselves but for all the world. By rousing the Teutonic Dragon and provoking a far-right backlash that led to Hitler's rise to power, not only did the Jews themselves suffer from the evils of Nazism but so did many more among the goykind, especially the Slavs. Jews made it bad for everyone by provoking what should have been left alone. In that regard, it's the Jews who need to apologize to all of humanity, not vice versa. It's like someone who plays with fire may not only burn himself but burn down the whole village. Imagine a scenario where there's a hideous creature called the Dark Soul Beast that lurks beneath ground. This is a fearsome monster but generally avoids the surface. But, once above ground, it can do serious damage. So, most people in town know not to mess with the monster. Just leave it be in its own dark domain. But suppose a visitor in town keeps doing things to provoke the monster. He throws rocks into tunnels leading to where the beast resides. He pisses into the hole leading to the monster's lair. He tosses rotten food into the hole. The townsfolk warn the visitor to stop because the beast might be aroused, but the visitor tells them to just fuc* off and keeps doing stuff to provoke the Dark Soul Beast. And one day, the creature had just about enough of the provocations and crawls out and tears the visitor limb from limb. But then, the monster is so furious that it begins to attack the whole town like it's King Kong or something. So, not only did the visitor suffer terribly but the town got wrecked too. In a sense, the visitor is a victim, but he is not an entirely innocent victim. He provoked and roused something that should have been left alone. Furthermore, in infuriating the monster with his antics, he also made the whole town suffer.

And it is in this sense that Jews must bear some responsibility not only for the Shoah but also for the tens of millions of goyim who perished in World War II. If certain Jews hadn't been so radically unhinged, if certain Jews hadn't been so wantonly greedy, and if certain other Jews hadn't been so grossly perverted, there was a good chance that the dark Teutonic soul would have remained in slumber, and the Weimar Democratic experiment might have worked. And then, not only would millions of Jews not have died in the Shoah but tens of millions of goy lives that perished in WWII also would have been spared. Will Jews ever face up to this, that they played a key role in bringing about WWII by provoking the dark Teutonic soul? (Even though Germany suffered far worse in WWII than in WWI, the quick recovery and successful democratic experiment may have partially owed to there having been virtually no Jews to mess up the rebuilding project as they'd done following WWI. But ever since Jews took over the US and applied pressures on EU to embrace Diversity and Multi-Culturalism, the democratic project has gone terribly wrong in every European nation. Also in recent years, Germany invited Jews to immigrate, and these Jews are acting just like the Jews of the Weimar Period. They never seem to learn, but this time, it could be that Jews may well fully realize the total racial and cultural demise of Germany that has become castrated and deracinated, thereby incapable of offering up any resistance.) Jews learned nothing, and they will learn nothing as long as goyim submit to the obnoxious Holocaust Narrative of wholly innocent Jews mass-murdered by Evil Nazis and their goy collaborators who just went batshit crazy for no good reason or just for the hell of it.

What lies ahead for the world in the 21st century if Jews don't face up to their history & failings and if so many goyim go along with Jews out of ignorance, naivete, worship, cowardice, opportunism, or insanity? How many people realize that the US is the lone superpower that is utterly obeisant to Jewish Power gone megalomaniacal and psycho? People talk of how North Korea with nukes is run by lunatic Kim or how Iran is ruled by evil Ayatollahs. If so, just think how far more dangerous things are when the lone superpower that can blow up the whole world many times over is ruled by Jews-gone-wild and with total submission from both political parties and goy cuck elites, or the Soy Cuck Club? If what has happened to the Middle East in this century is any harbinger for events to come, we are in big big trouble unless people begin to courageously address the Jewish Question and Jews begin to make a more honest assessment of themselves and their history.

Indeed, not only did Jewish Evil, in conflict with German Evil and in conjunction with Soviet Evil, bring about the cataclysmic World War II, but Jewish Evil has been the driving force behind the many horrible events since the end of the Cold War. Jews call for War-on-Terror but more often than not work with terrorists to destabilize secular Arab nations and modernizing Muslim nations. Jews denounce the Nazis but were more than willing to recruit quasi-nazis in Ukraine to topple the government there, one that despite its corruption was democratically elected. Just about everything said about Iraq, Libya, and Syria were lies, all in furtherance of Jewish Supremacism.

Jews are not only partly responsible for WWII but for involving the West in the grievous crime of destroying the Palestinian people. As Jews couldn't steal Palestine on their own, they used the West as partners-in-crime. Those who aid and abet in a crime are also criminal, and the West is guilty of complicity in the destruction of the Palestinian people whose fate forewarned the coming of White Nakba under Jewish hegemony.
So much for "Never Again", which apparently means Never Again only for Jews but 'Never Mind' for the rest of humanity. Never Again a Holocaust for Jews, but when Jews create mini-holocausts all over the Middle East, just Never Mind. As Madeleine Albright said, it's worth it to kill hundreds of thousands of Arab children. As the Yinon Plan laid out, it's in the interest of Jewish Supremacism to provoke bloody wars all over the Middle East. So, terrorism is wonderful as long as Israel and the US can arm & supply neo-medievalist anarcho-Muslim terrorist to blow things up in nations like Syria and Libya. The Jewish-controlled US and Israel start the fires but then pretend to be the world's firemen putting out the fires. Arsonists larping as fire-fighters. Norman Podhoretz wrote of "World War IV", but it never seems to have occurred to him that Jewish Power is the new nazism. But what do Jews care?
If, at the very least, they suffered along with the rest of humanity in WWII, they've arranged things so that Jews remain untouched and enjoy life like effendi while the goyim do all the dying, getting maimed, getting displaced, and getting replaced. Middle East and North Africa get ravaged by wars, and the populations get displaced. Meanwhile, the native white peoples of Europe get replaced, and if any nation, such as Hungary, says NO to the 'refugees' of the Wars for Israel, it must be targeted for destruction by whatever means. Holocaust of goyim is amusing to Jews and perfectly fine AS LONG AS Jewish lives remain safe and secure. Never Again for Jews, Never Mind for goyim.

What is in store for humanity in a world where Jewish Power is not named and exposed? Just think. Russia and China are both nuclear-armed nations, and their interests and ambitions are regional and limited. In contrast, Jews want to use the US to rule the world. Also, tensions between US and Russia are worse now than during the Cold War solely because Jews hate Russians for taking their country back from Jewish oligarchs. How insane is that? And while Jews work with the Chinese to undermine White America, they also find the 'Chi-Com' trope useful because angry white Deplorables are likely to blame everything on China without ever waking up to Jewish Evil.
So, we have half the country, the libby-dibs, blaming Russia-Russia-Russia for everything, and we have the other half the country, the conzo-wonzos, blaming China-China-China for everything. Such tensions can be resolved IF people speak the truth and expose Jewish Power as the real machinations behind most global tensions. But ironically, so many Americans worship Jews like the German masses once revered Hitler. Blind, mindless, and crazy. If this madness goes on, 21st century could blow up worse than the 20th century. And even more than in the first half of the 20th century, Jews will have played a big role in it, indeed by far the biggest. After all, whereas Jews constituted only one of the great powers that gambled with history in the first half of the 20th century, they are by far the most dominant power in this century.

Now, suppose the worst possible scenario happens and a war worse than WWII breaks out some time in the 21st century. Things get so out-of-control that suppose 3 million Jews die and many more goyim die, anywhere from 30 million to 50 million. What will Jews say then? Will they bitch and moan about 'Muh Holocaust II' and ignore the many more dead goyim? Will they blame the goyim for yet another horrible war and their failure to save the Jews once again? Will they do that without ever facing up to the fact that Jewish Power would have played the biggest role in turning goy nations against one another and triggering a world conflict? Given the current state of Jewish character, I wouldn't be surprised.

OUR ‘GREATEST ALLY’ JUST GAVE A HERO’S WELCOME TO A HATED ENEMY OF THE US by The Red Elephants - Vincent James

Unlike Classic Marxism, the Current 'Socialism' is NOT about Class Conflict but about the Special Primacy of Jews, Blacks, and Homos — Current 'Socialism' is more about Resentment of the Educated Class than Needs of the Workers of the World

Political Correctness and 'wokeness' have been associated with socialism-communism, but they are now more like Judeo-Nazism with Maoist hysterics about the supremacy of blacks and sanctity of homos. Under communism, the worst possible label was 'bourgeois', and so, anything deemed bad, heretical, or false was deemed 'bourgeois' even if it had nothing to do with the actual historical bourgeoisie. When communists attacked other communists, they accused the other being 'bourgeois'. During the Sino-Soviet Rift, the Soviets belittled Maoism as a 'petite-bourgeois' theory, and the Chinese predictably denounced Soviet Union as 'bourgeois revisionist'. (Marxists also dismissed the Iranian Revolution as 'bourgeois'.) So, 'bourgeois' became an all-encompassing term of excoriation against anything deemed undesirable or threatening to the ruling regime or communist hack-intellectuals. It was like all sides in Christian Europe accused their enemies of being agents of the Devil. "God was on OUR side" while the Other Side was tainted with Devil-worship EVEN IF they all worshiped the same God.

Still, the emphasis on the 'bourgeoisie' as the source of all evils — even Fascism and National Socialism were theorized as mere byproducts of bourgeois capitalism, i.e. the rich class recruited faux-revolutionary thugs to protect its property from the communists and workers as vanguards of the True Revolution — makes it clear that Marxism believed class conflict to be the central issue deciding history and morality. The worst evil in the world was class oppression because it was diagnosed to be the source of all other evils. As Karl Marx said, so-called antisemitism is the cause of class conflict: Because Jews are so maniacal about money, capitalism fuels their insatiable greed, and this leads to Jews acting badly and goyim feeling resentful of Jewish wealth and abuses. Therefore, the ONLY way to get rid of 'antisemitism' and other forms of bigotry is to bring about a communist revolution that would make for a classless society of equality. That way, Jews and Goyim will be comrades, brothers and sisters, under the sun. According to classic Marxism, as long as capitalism exists and bourgeois factors create class divisions, it will lead to other forms of divisions as well. One reason will owe to some groups being more adept at business and extraction; they are more clever that way and gain dominance over other less acquisitive groups. The other reason will be the rich and powerful will exploit racial and cultural differences as a divide-and-rule mechanism. Yet, another reason will be that the masses of proles will be too overworked, under-educated, and beastly in a system of dog-eat-dog capitalism to rise above crude tribalism. Ultimately, the real source of all such bigotries was economic injustice. Make people equal in property and education, and they will appreciate one another more as fellow humans. Marx was convinced that, while Jews may gain great wealth under capitalism, they will always be hated. (Ironically, Jews came to be regarded with greater suspicion in the Soviet Union while they came to be much praised in the capitalist US. American Capitalism, having a less darker history than the European counterpart, may have been a factor. American cult of freedom has been more meritocratic and extols the Winner, especially because of the mythos that ANYONE can succeed. Jews certainly won big. But it also owes to the fact that Jews took over much of the academia and media & entertainment and elevated the Shoah to a quasi-religion and made 'racism', especially against Jews and blacks, the worst possible sin — badmouthing Arabs, Iranians, and Palestinians is perfectly fine.)

Anyway, if capitalism said ANYONE, regardless of race or creed, can become gloriously rich, communism said ANYONE, regardless of race or culture, can be made evil by greed and money. Capitalism said it's great that a Jew or a Christian can become rich. Communism said it's sad that both a Jew and a Christian can be corrupted by money. Marxism didn't spare the Jews. While Marx lamented antisemitism, he didn't regard Jews as innocent pure-as-snow angels who were hated for irrational reasons. He believed they were hated for rational and material reasons: Capitalism brought out the worst aspects of Jewish Character as molded through history(of money-making). So, the only workable compromise between Goyim and Jews was for goyim to drop their resentment on grounds that Jews will forsake their greed. Only then as comrades could Jews and all kinds of goyim get along.

Because Antifa types and other so-called 'leftists' claim to be socialist or even communist — and because so many on the Right love to draw parallels between Marxism/Maoism and current PC madness in the West — , one would think Old Communism is back in force. But actually, so-called Antifa, though claiming to be anti-fascist, is oddly closer in spirit to Nazism that put Race at the center of its worldview. Unlike Marxism that said ANY PEOPLE, both Jews and Goyim, can become corrupted by money and power, the current PC insists that the problems of power is almost always about 'white supremacism'. So, it doesn't matter how rich Jews are, how successful blacks are, how well-off non-whites are. The problem is always about 'whiteness'. If some whites are exempted from total abuse, it is only because they funnel lots of money toward PC to appease the beast. According to PC, a poor white person who holds an American flag and doesn't hate himself & his race is a greater evildoer than super-rich whites like Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates who fund PC causes.
As for Jews, blacks, homos, and certain non-white groups, it doesn't matter how rich they are. (Latin American whites are also exempt from the worst of abuse.) You are GOOD simply because you're Jewish, black, homo, or etc. But if you're white(and straight), it doesn't matter how many hardships you face. It doesn't matter if you've been attacked by blacks or fleeced by Jews. You SUCK because you're white.

The notion of 'racism' change from one's attitudes to one's innate character. It went from mutable to immutable. It went from an attitude that anyone can have, borne of ignorance and meanness, to a condition that certain groups are born with, regardless of their attitude. So, you can be a hateful Jew or nasty Negro, but you're hardly 'racist'. You can be a Zionist Jew pushing all kinds of wars in the Middle East to destroy countless Arab/Muslim lives, but that's okay. Jews can dehumanize Russians and white Christians, and that's cool too. And, blacks can do thug-talk, threaten other races, attack other groups, and indulge in all sorts of hateful rhetoric. But no matter what they do, it's always contextualized as 'resistance against systemic racism', that is UNLESS blacks badmouth Jews and homos.
In contrast, if you're white, you are 'racist'(or tainted with the white mark of cain) no matter how much you try to be fair with rest of humanity. Indeed, the reason why white Antifa types are so soul-damaged is they indulge in an insane kind of self-hatred. They've internalized Jewish PC so much that they believe it's no longer sufficient for whites to reject 'racist' hatred against non-whites. Rather, whites must actively hate their own race as innately tainted with the 'original sin' of 'racism'. Thus, White Antifa is less about anti-hatred than pro-hatred-against-the-self. (Of course, Jewish leaders of Antifa happily promote such attitude among their white dolt comrades.)
If Antifa is truly communist, socialist, or Marxist, it should focus mostly on economic issues. In regarding the 'bourgeois' elements as the source of all inequality and evil, they would condemn ALL forms of power, wealth, and privilege. They would hate Barack Obama who's approaching a billion dollars in personal wealth. They should be denouncing Tim Cook and other fancy-pants homos who do the bidding of oligarchs and the deep state. Karl Marx did just this. Though of Jewish origin, he lambasted Jewish capitalists as among the worst bourgeois elements. But no such is heard from current Antifa and of course BLM. Their worldview is essentially racial-supremacist in that good or evil is really a matter of one's identity. So, it doesn't matter what Jews, blacks, or homos do or how much wealth they have and how much privilege they enjoy. They are wonderful and good simply because of their vaunted identities. In contrast, it doesn't matter how difficult one's situation is as a white person; it doesn't matter how much he or she tries to be good and fair-minded. He or she is bad, even 'white supremacist', simply because he or she is white or, worse, refuses to hate himself/herself.

How ironic that Jews who support Antifa as anti-fascist and anti-'racist', a means to expose and hunt down 'nazis' and 'white supremacists', are now the main purveyors of something like a Neo-Nazi outlook. Jewish Power pushes a certain racial essentialism. Jews are forever to be 'essentialized' as the Holocaust People, or Holochs. So, even when Jews act like Nazis and abuse Palestinians, Jews are a bunch of Anne Franks while Palestinians might as well be the 'nazis'. In the most perverse way, Jews have used the narrative of victimization under supremacist Nazis to justify a kind of moral nihilism for Jews, i.e. because Jews suffered so much, they are forever wise, and therefore, everything done by Jews must be grand! In other words, Jews invoke 'Never Again' against the evils of Nazism to act like a bunch of Judeo-Nazis. Just ask the Palestinians.
And blacks are to be 'essentialized' forever as a bunch of Emmett Tills when, in fact, so many black thugs roam the streets and terrorize people worse than the KKK ever did. If Jews really care about humanity, why are they most angry with Donald Trump when he wants to de-escalate wars in the Middle East? Why have the likes of Thomas Friedman praised ISIS as the wreckers of Assad's Syria? If Jews are really against 'racism', why are they perfectly fine with Trump and Pompeo's most blatant form of racial bigotry: the mindless support of Zionist imperialism against Palestinians and other Arabs? And if Jews are opposed to racial essentialism, why do they create TV shows that feature Jews and blacks as noble simply for what they are, whereas whites are villains because it's in the nature of whites to be 'racist' and 'supremacist'?
Jews fool a lot of people by claiming to condemn 'white supremacism', but the notion that some groups are incorrigibly 'racist' whereas other groups, such as Jews and blacks, are always 'anti-racist' is essentially supremacist. A truly anti-supremacist view would argue that ANY group, given the circumstances, could be supremacist. It was certainly the case with Romans and Germanic barbarians. When Romans were on top, they could lord over the Germanics with supremacist arrogance. But when the empire fell apart and the Germanic barbarians rampaged through Rome, who were the supremacist overlords?

Any honest person would admit the current US is animated by Jewish Supremacism, especially in foreign policy and historical memory. When Jews are remembered only as victims of the Shoah but not as perpetrators of mass killings of others, it's like remembering white history only in terms of what American Indian savages did to white settlers but not what the white invaders did to the Native Tribes. And how can BLM be anything but a form of supremacism when it pretends that even obvious black thugs and degenerates are saintly victims of white supremacism while totally overlooking all the anti-white violence carried out by deranged blacks? When blacks rioted and looted, carrying out modern-day pogroms, the Jewish-run media didn't care about the victims because they were white or non-blacks. (While some Jews were negatively affected too, Jewish Power saw it as a gambit to bring down Trump America. One step backward for Jews for three steps forward for Jewish Power.) Indeed, the Jewish PC Narrative mirrors the peculiar manner of Jewish remembrance of Russian History. Jews never let us forget about the Slavic pogroms against Jews but suppress all discussion of Jewish role in Bolshevik violence that literally destroyed millions of lives. In other words, pogroms were worse because thousands of Jews were affected because, of course, a single Jewish life has more value than a million Slavic lives. It's a form of JLM or "Jewish Lives Matter MORE than Slavic lives", especially if the Slavs were slaughtered at the behest of Jewish communist henchmen.

At the very least, because communism identified economic injustice and class oppression as the true source of evil, any group could be condemned for being 'bourgeois'. While the Soviet Union forbade antisemitism, an ethno-racial animus against Jews, it attacked Jewish capital as well as goy capital. So, even though Jews were protected as communists, they could be destroyed like anyone else as capitalists. So, Jews could be good(communist) or bad(capitalist). But according to current Identity Politics of PC ideology, Jews are never bad or wrong. Jews can be Liberal Zionists or Neocons; both are great. Jews can be socialist or capitalist; both are super. Jews are great no matter what they do. Both GOP and Democratic Party expend most of their energies in flattering and appeasing Jews. Democrats will denounce white conservatism but praise Neocons. Republicans will denounce white liberalism but praise Liberal Zionists. Jews are exempt from all blame. Donald Trump was dragged through the mud by Jewish Power, but his main message is "I Luv Israel, and I Kiss Jewish Butt." And in the recent riots, black thuggery and violence were celebrated by Democrats and unopposed by Republicans. Even as cities burned, Trump was sucking up to blacks and making Fentanyl Floyd into a saint-angel.

This is so unlike Marxism or communism where any group, any nationality, or any race could face moral censure and condemnation for evils. Current PC is more like Nazism because it's about the racial supremacism of Jews and blacks(with special honors for Homos). It says certain groups(Jews, blacks, and homos) are infallible, while whites are intrinsically tainted(no matter what they do or say). Sadly, whites brought this upon themselves because they've enabled the current state of affairs. Whites grovel to Jews who demean them most. Whites also hurt those who face the same kind of hatred from Jews. Given Jewish vitriol and venom against whites, the logical thing would be for whites to side with other targets of Jewish hatred. Whites should be main allies with Russia and Iran; whites should be shouting, "Palestine is our greatest ally." But whites, as politicians, preachers, tax-payers, and soldiers, go out of their way to do the bidding of Jews in destroying other victims of Jewish Power. So, even as Jewish Power clobbers Trump and his white Christian Base, they are enabling the total destruction of Palestine. It'd be like Poles sucking up to Nazi Germany even as Germans push them around. It's truly a disgusting sight.

Whatever socialism that remains among the American 'Left' is NOT about the workers. If American 'leftists' really cared about the Power of Labor, it would call for end of immigration which has a scab-effect on Big Labor. They would also support policies that encourage more blacks toward productive work. But the American 'left' condemned welfare reform under Billy Boy Clinton because it 'heartlessly' put conditions on blacks to find some kind of useful employment. American 'left' doesn't care for workers or labor. What goes by the name of 'socialism' in most places is the demand for more freebies for parasites. Indeed, most 'leftists' and so-called 'progressives' look down on most jobs as demeaning and dirty for 'losers'. They don't want to pick up the shovel. They want to use pens. They want the government to produce more 'clean' jobs for bureaucrats, officials, operatives, instructors, activists, coordinators, managers, and the like. They want to be busy doing nothing in bogus jobs that make them feel they are 'saving the planet', 'working for progress', 'raising consciousness', 'fighting hatred', and etc. Over the years, more people got college degrees, but most degrees outside practical fields like science, technology, medicine, and the like are pretty useless. What good are most 'liberal arts' degrees or 'humanities' degrees, let alone degrees in Women's Studies, Black Studies, Gender Studies, and most social sciences? Out of college, all these people with fancy-pants college degrees realize their future is working for Starbucks and serving coffee to people who make lots of money in high tech, medicine, entertainment, finance, and the like. (And those with secure government jobs do pretty well.) And this breeds resentment among many of the educated. Thus, current 'socialism' is not about the proletariat or the working class at war with the rich; rather, it's about college-educated Starbucks workers feeling resentful about having to serve expensive coffee to their much more successful peers who specialized in practical fields like technology or money management. These 'socialists' don't feel any sense of camaraderie with the Workers of the World whom they regard as 'losers of the world'. They don't lose sleep over wage-slaves toiling in Asia to make Nike shoes. If anything, they want the hip and fashionable lifestyles enjoyed by the yupsters, or yuppie-hipsters who work for companies like Apple, Google, Microsoft, and Wall Street firms. In a way, they feel more deserving of the good life because they majored in more 'meaningful' fields like arts, culture, and ideas whereas their more successful 'shallow' peers only care about making money. And yet, they are gravitated to the world of privilege; their dream is to live in a fancy condo, be surrounded by books and music, and attend cocktail parties. But only a handful of people who majored in arts/culture/ideas get to attain privileged slots in society.

Still, given the resentment against the successful, you'd think the current 'socialists' would be most passionately anti-rich. But despite their rhetoric about the 99% vs the 1%, their main passions are for the holy three of Jews, blacks, and homos(and sometimes 'diversity'), while their main ire is directed at 'white supremacism', 'racism'(that means speaking truthfully about blacks), 'homophobia'(that means refusal to celebrate 'gay pride'), and 'nazism'(that means anyone hated by Jews is a 'nazi' who must be punched and destroyed).
Of course, being anti-rich while being mindlessly pro-Jewish makes no sense because Jews are, by far, the richest people in the world. For one to say that excess wealth is evil but then claim that Jews are above criticism is, for all practical purposes, anti-socialist. If Jews, the richest people on Earth, cannot be condemned, it means Jewish Wealth must be protected. And being pro-'gay' is also antithetical to socialism because homos are naturally vain, narcissistic, elitist, and fancy-pants aristo. While there have been some homos on the Real Left, homo nature tends toward catering to the rich, privileged, and the fancy crowd. Once 'socialism' is associated with homo-celebration, Mayday turns into Gayday, which is precisely why rich Jews and the oligarchy(even in the GOP) pushed the homo agenda so far.
Also, celebration of Jews and homos can only be a kind of elite-minority-supremacism. While some minorities are poor and powerless, some are rich and powerful, much more so than the great majority. In the US, almost nothing is said of the plight of American Indians or Muslim-Americans(especially of Palestinian backgrounds), the powerless minorities. Jews and homos, as minority-ruling-elites, count for much more; they are akin to the British Imperialist minority elites in India or the white-Jewish minority elite in Old South Africa.
As for blacks, yes, it's true that many are mired in poverty and backwardness. But blacks are also oppressors as street thugs, predators, criminals, and bullies. It's been said that comedians should punch up than down, but it's not like all members of the group are either up or down. While some whites are above blacks, some whites are below blacks. While rich whites live in communities totally safe from black criminality, other whites are constantly attacked by black thuggery. Just because one bunch of whites are above blacks doesn't mean ALL blacks are above them. Some whites are below blacks. But in Jewish-controlled US, there is this crazy notion that ALL whites are privileged with supremacist power while ALL blacks are oppressed. It's like ALL Jews are forever Holocaust Survivors or something whereas ALL Russians, despite having suffered tragically from Jewish Bolshevism and Jewish gangster-capitalism(in the 1990s and even today under international sanctions), are forever tagged with blame for the pogroms.

What can be done to save the West? It must go Cold Turkey with the truth. And white people have no one to blame but themselves unless they speak the obvious truth: That the West is now Jewish Supremacist and that 'white supremacism' is just smoke-and-mirrors cooked up by Jewish Power to distract people from the fact that the modus operandi is "Is it great for Jewish Supremacism?" Then and only then can whites work toward White Liberation whereupon whites will be telling Jewish Power, "I don't want to work on Maggie's Farm no more." This will not only be great for whites but for all victim peoples of Jews, such as the Palestinians, Iranians, and Russians. White Racial Disobedience and Resistance to Jewish Supremacism will mean No More Wars for Israel & Zion and no more use of white energies to spread the 'ghaspel'(the ghastly gospel) of Globo-Homo and Afro-Mania around the world. The White Bridges used to spread Jewish Supremacism(and its proxies) around the world must be blown up. If whites resist, the rest of the world will take inspiration and follow suit. If whites cuck and submit to Jewish Supremacism, the rest of the world will do the same. This is the special place whites have in the world. Though the West is Jewish-supremacist and Jewish-dominated, Jewish Power feeds on white submission and obedience. White behavior vis-a-vis Jewish Power serves as the template for all the world. So, if whites suck up to Jews and worship globo-homo-BLM craziness, other races will do likewise. But if whites finally say NO and stand up to Jewish supremacist perfidy, others around the world will also get the message and toss away the shackles. Whites no longer have the power of rule, but they still have the choice between submission and liberation to the rule. And what whites do will determine the direction of history.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/lQzSILxdgCOq/

Commentary on "Bolsonaro: a Monster Engineered by Our Media"(by Jonathan Cook)

https://www.jonathan-cook.net/blog/2018-10-30/bolsonaro-is-a-monster-engineered-by-our-media/

Without the gatekeepers in place to limit access to the “free press” – itself the plaything of billionaires and global corporations, with brands and a bottom line to protect – the rabble has supposedly been freed to give expression to their innate bigotry.

Nothing will make sense unless we mention Jewish control of much of Western Media and Finance. And of course academia that produces all the 'thinkers' and strategists and enforcers of law firms, courts, and deep state. While ALL global oligarchs and corporations have some things in common, ethnicity and group-identity do matter. Jewish oligarchs, Russian oligarchs, Chinese oligarchs, Iranian oligarchs, and etc. are all in the Game for Wealth and Privilege, but they don't think alike. The reason why Jewish Power hates nationalist candidates is because nationalism means 'our nation, our people, and our land first'. America First or Brazil First. This is bad for Jewish globalist supremacism because nationalist regimes will put their nation before Jewish globalist interests. Generally, a nation is defined by its majority population. Poland has minorities of non-Poles, such as Vietnamese, but Core Poland is the Polish people. So, a nationalist Poland is about prioritizing the identity and pride of Poles. Now, this shouldn't be a threat to ordinary Jews or even successful Jews. After all, Poland is open to world trade and has gotten over its worst anti-Jewish excesses. So, why are Jews so pissed? Because they seek world dominance and hegemony. And that means making white nations(and some others) prioritize Jewish-controlled globalism over nationalism. Also, nationalism, because it boosts national and ethnic pride and identity, is more difficult for Jews to manipulate. In order for Jews to gain control over a people, they need to suppress national pride in favor of 'white guilt' or Homomania or Afromania. Nationalism is like a heavily shielded phalanx. This is why Jews push Diversity, Homomania, Afromania, and White Guilt. Diversity makes it more difficult for white nations to pull together into one. Homomania undermines moral integrity, and young ones become most excited about waving 'gay' flags in honor of homo fecal penetration. Afromania undermines white manhood by presenting blacks as superior studs with more muscle, bigger dongs, and louder voices. It infects white women with Jungle Fever and white boys with cucky-wuckery. It says black race is superior to the wussy white race that needs to be mixed with cooler blackness. And White Guilt makes whites feel that they are uniquely guilty of historical 'sins', and therefore, the ONLY permitted pride among whites is the Pride of Redemptive Self-Loathing. Then, Jews can manipulate whites into supporting Jews, the people with Sacred Victim Identity.

The problem with Jonathan Cook's brand of leftism is it analyzes the world only in terms of Economic Interests, as if the world is made up of Noble Poor and Evil Rich. He also assumes that all the Rich think alike. Not so, especially when a Rich People happen to have a strong ethnic identity. Jews do have a strong identity, and therefore, Jewish Rich aren't only out for money. They are out for Power in service of Jewish supremacism. Consider the sanctions against Iran. From a purely economic viewpoint, it makes no sense. Lots of Jews can make tons of money dealing with Iran. Iran would be happy to do business with Jewish oligarchs in US and EU. So, why the sanctions? Why are Jews sacrificing business opportunities in Iran? It's because they, as an ethnic-minded people, see Iran as a threat to Israeli hegemony. And take Russia. Jewish bigshots can make tons of money by encouraging more trade with Russia. So, why the sanctions? Because Russian brand of nationalism(though mild) and sovereignty inspires other nations to defy the Jewish globo-homo hegemony. So, unless Cook mentions the Jews, he won't get at the heart of what is going on. Indeed, one reason why even non-communist Jews valued Marxism and ideology of Class Conflict was because the theories obfuscated the level of Jewish involvement in capitalism. By turning the conflict into one between the Workers and the Generic Bourgeoisie, it led people to overlook the fact that Jews had a special role in world capitalism, especially in finance. People don't live on bread alone. Money is nice but ultimately meaningless. Like Sheldon Adelson said, he found true meaning in life by becoming an avid supporter of Israel. Money gave him privilege and power, but Zionism gave him meaning. Granted, there are lots of rich people without meaning. They just rake in all the dough. But such people eventually end up serving those with meaning(whatever it may be) because power is like electricity. In and of itself, it has no higher purpose. It has to be directed at something. So, power from an electric generator is used to power TVs. Or radios. Or computers. Jews use the Juice to serve the Jews. This is why they are so powerful. They not only have money but meaning. In contrast, deracinated creeps like Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos have no meaning except money, money, and money. So, when it comes to meaning, they follow the lead of the Jews who do have meaning. So, Bezos' Washington Post continues to shill for Israel and Jewish supremacism even though Bezos the Bozo isn't Jewish.

Simon Jenkins:
When debate is no longer through regulated media, courts and institutions, politics will default to the mob. Social media – once hailed as an agent of global concord – has become the purveyor of falsity, anger and hatred. Its algorithms polarise opinion. Its pseudo-information drives argument to the extremes.

Of course, Jenkins is full of BS. Not because he's wrong about much of social media but because he'd be fine with the lies, fake stories, vulgarity, and stupidity AS LONG AS the political outcomes favored globo-homo hegemony. After all, homomania was spread through trash culture, celebrity nonsense, PC mobs on social media, and lots of herd-like hysteria. But people like Jenkins never protested the trashiness as long as it served their agenda. Also, the reason why there are so many crazies in social media is because the globalists have pushed the erosion of roots and culture. So, we have too many clowns who get swept up with the latest trends, fashions, and hypes. If there is one good thing about the spread of nationalism via social media, it is the desire to reconnect with roots, identity, and heritage that give life meaning.

Also, even if social media are full of fake news and conspiracy theories, they are beneficial as counterweight against the power of Deep State and Corporate Media. Alex Jones spread lots of nonsense, but his conspiracy theories did encourage his fans to be more critical and less trusting of the Deep State and globalism. Given that the Deep State is a warmonger and that the big corporations brainwash us with endless BS advertising, it's not the worst thing to be more distrustful and cynical about the Powers That Be. Under Limbaugh-ism, many Americans were led to support the Iraq War. But under Jones-ism, Americans are far more likely to question the US aggression. Indeed, Jones condemned Trump for his attacks on Syria. Social media are filled with lots of alternative truths and lies. But even alternative fake stories are still preferable to fake stories by MSM because, whereas MSM tells lies to support globo-homo imperialist hegemony, alternative fake stories are made to question the Power and oppose imperialism. So, even if not every alternative 9/11 story is true, it still encourages people to ask more questions than just TRUST the Power, which by now is utterly corrupt, not least because it is concentrated in the hands of Jews who, unlike Wasp elites of old, will not tolerate any criticism of them. Jews say we must condemn 'white nationalism' but ignore the fact that 'white nationalism', like other forms of nationalism, is a reaction to Jewish Supremacism. When Jews in media say they are going to do to white people what they did to Palestinians -- replace them permanently -- , of course nationalism against Jewish supremacism is going to be a response. Jews claim that they stand for a polyglot multi-cultural society against 'white supremacism', but Jewish vision of Diversity isn't about all peoples sharing power equally and proportionately. No, it's about Jews at the top using the Diverse Mass against white people. It's like British using their multi-colored troops to put down national resistance in the colonies. If Jews were truly for equality and proportionality, they would be pushing for a New Social Order in which Jews own only 2% of wealth, 2% of media, 2% of Wall Street, 2% of Hollywood, 2% of gambling, 2% of Silicon Valley, 2% of Law firms, and etc. After all, Jews are only 2% of the population. But Jews never seem alarmed by the fact the the 2% is gaining more of the wealth, privilege, and power. So, Jewish opposition to white nationalism is to protect Jewish supremacism. Jews seek to use Diversity to create divisions against goyim so that the 98% won't be able to unite against the 2% that rules the West.

Bolsonaro, like Trump, is not a disruption of the current neoliberal order; he is an intensification or escalation of its worst impulses. He is its logical conclusion... Despite their professed concern, the plutocrats and their media spokespeople much prefer a far-right populist like Trump or Bolsonaro to a populist leader of the genuine left. They prefer the social divisions fuelled by neo-fascists like Bolsonaro, divisions that protect their wealth and privilege, over the unifying message of a socialist who wants to curtail class privilege, the real basis of the elite’s power.

If Trump is an intensification of the worst impulses of neoliberal order, why are Jews and Deep State so angry at him and even cooked up Russia Collusion nonsense to derail him? If neoliberals are all about greed, why do they oppose Trump's wish for peace with Russia? It will mean more business opportunities for US corporations and businessmen? NeoLiberal is Judeo-Hegemonic, and Jews put their identity and power above all things. The fact is the US is the most powerful and influential nation on Earth. So, when Trump says he is a nationalist, it is a green light for other nations to follow suit. Neoliberals hate this because their increased profits depend on Free Trade Globalism. Also, Jewish supremacism depends on suppression of national identity and pride in goy nations, esp white ones. Money isn't everything, and Jews know this. Germany is the biggest and richest nation in Western Europe, but it is politically among the weakest. Why? It's nationalism and identity have been totally suppressed by Shoah-Worship and German Guilt. So, Jews can run circles around Germany despite its great wealth. In contrast, Hungary, though much smaller and poorer, has pride of identity, and that makes it difficult for the likes of Soros to run roughshod over it. It's not only about money and class. Jews know that national identity is the most unifying force in a nation. Indeed, even a poor backward nation like Vietnam was able to expel a superpower like the US because of the power of nationalism. Rich people, middle people, and poor people can become one under nationalism. Even socialism works best along with nationalism. Nationalism breeds trust and shared sense of destiny. Socialism works better within homogeneity than amidst diversity where some groups feel they are being robbed by others. Because socialism works best within the national framework, the fascist-socialism is the best kind. Sweden's success didn't owe to democracy or liberalism. It owed to homogeneity, intelligence, trust, and unity of rich-middle-and-poor. But look how the social fabric and social welfare in that country is beginning to fray with Diversity Invasion that fills the nations with leeches.

Trump and Bolsonaro are not logical CONCLUSIONS of the world order. They are limbo-figures. What they stand for is inconclusive and contradictory, not least because the nations they rule over are now so diverse, fractured, and messy. Trump has been all over the map, partly due to his impetuous nature but also due to Deep State obstacles that have sabotaged his plans for making up with Russia, ending war in Syria, and erecting a wall along the border. Because of these pressures, Trump has been forced to be even tougher on Russia to prove he's not a Russian agent.
While the super-rich may prefer Trump's tax cuts, they are not just about money. Most of the super-rich hate Trump because they are either Jewish and/or Globalist. Jews hate Trump for reviving nationalism(that may stand in the way of Jewish supremacism), and globalists like Bezos hate Trump because they are post-national and see the entire globe as their oyster for the taking. A nation, even a nation as big as the US, is too small for their scope and ambition.

Do the globo-oligarchs prefer 'fascists' like Trump and Bolsonaro over true socialists? Maybe, but keep in mind that Bernie Sanders stood with the globalist oligarchs against Trump in 2016. Also, Sanders seems to be just as anti-Russia and anti-Syria. So, is Sanders really a Socialist First or Zionist First? As for Jeremy Corbyn, the Establishment's opposition to him has little to do with his economic policies. The Power knows they can always pull the strings and manipulate things to rein in socialism no matter who wins. The reason for all the ire against Corbyn has been his pro-Palestinian stance. Most media are owned or financed by Jews. If Corbyn just played at being socialist and waved the Israeli flag, Jews would be seeing him as their boy. But Corbyn has often sided with Muslims and Palestinians, and this pissed off Jews. British Jewish elites pushed mass-immigration-invasion into the UK to use non-whites against whites. The Jewish narrative was 'we noble Jews and you noble colored against those evil racist whites'. But Corbyn listened to Muslims who said, "Racist Jews are killing Arabs and waging evil wars in the Middle East" and agreed, even if mildly. And that set off the media firestorm against him.
So, what do Corbyn and Trump have in common despite their different economic theories? They are both hated by Jews. Jews hate Trump for igniting 'white nationalism'(against Jewish supremacism), and Jews hate Corbyn for supporting Palestinian nation-hood(against Zionist supremacism). The failure to mention the Jewish Power in this is either a blindspot or craven cowardice on the part of Jonathan Cook.

The true left – whether in Brazil, Venezuela, Britain or the US – does not control the police or military, the financial sector, the oil industries, the arms manufacturers, or the corporate media. It was these very industries and institutions that smoothed the path to power for Bolsonaro in Brazil, Viktor Orban in Hungary, and Trump in the US... Former socialist leaders like Brazil’s Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva or Hugo Chavez in Venezuela were bound to fail not so much because of their flaws as individuals but because powerful interests rejected their right to rule.

Hugo Chavez became virtual dictator. He rose through army ranks, and he used cronies in the military to back him. The reason why his successor is still in power is due to strong-arm tactics. Also, Chavezism failed for two reasons. Total dependence on high oil prices and promising freebies to masses of Diversity. Even as Chavez railed at Uncle Sam, his nation's economy depended totally on American capitalism. Without US consumers buying Venezuelan oil, there was no economy to speak of. Also, Venezuela is a low-trust and low-talent society. All that race-mixing led to too much low IQ and high-impulse African genetics. And, Diverse societies lack trust. White elites in Venezuela don't feel a common bond with the masses. And mixed-race people are confused in identity and feel nothing in common with native Indians. With such low talent, its economy depended on selling oil. And when oil prices were high, Chavez could dole out freebies to the masses to gain popularity. But he did nothing to expand industry or encourage enterprise. When oil prices plummeted, the whole thing collapsed. Socialism only works in tandem with nationalism and productive capitalism. Capitalism creates the wealth that can be taxed. No taxation, no socialism. Communism was about all the economy run by the state, and that was one huge failure. Also, socialism requires trust. People must think in terms of paying into the system and getting things back. In low trust societies, people try to pay nothing in while getting everything out. Now, a homogeneous people can be lacking in trust too. Look at Greek national character(though, to be sure, Greeks are much mixed due to endless invasions). But diversity makes it even worse. This is why any socialist who rejects capitalism and nationalism isn't for real. Socialism must rely on healthy capitalism that can be taxed. Socialism must maintain national unity that allows for trust and common bonds. This is why Swedish socialist policies must be for Swedish. If Swedes conquered Poland and Hungary and tried to maintain socialism for all three peoples, it'd be a mess as there would be too many divisions. How did Soviet socialism work throughout its vast diverse empire? Non-Russians got tired of Russian imperialism, and Soviet elites got sick of providing free stuff to an empire of leeches who did minimal work but demanded maximal benefits.

The real problem of Latin America isn't socialism or lack of socialism. It's diversity. Socialists will say all the world will become nice if they adopt Swedish social democracy, and libertarians blame the failure of Detroit on 'socialism' of the Democratic Party. It's all BS. Swedish social democracy worked for Sweden due to its racial, social, and cultural factors. Sweden will fail as it fills up with Diversity. Its social democracy will not work in an African nation with too many contentious tribes, low IQ, and lack of cultural capital. But then, libertarianism will also fail in places like Detroit because blacks are predisposed by genetics to be wild and crazy. Yes, that is race-ist but race-ism is truth. Races evolved differently to have different talents. Blacks are talented at chucking spears at hippos and running from them. They didn't evolve for civilization. They were not domesticated by evolution. Bringing them inside civilization is like bringing in coyotes and badgers into the house. They still got the wild genes.

Local elites in Latin America are tied umbilically to US elites, who in turn are determined to make sure any socialist experiment in their backyard fails – as a way to prevent a much-feared domino effect, one that might seed socialism closer to home... The media, the financial elites, the armed forces were never servants of the socialist governments that have been struggling to reform Latin America.

What about Cuba? Castro gained total power, and while the Cold War was on, the Soviet Union provided it with generous subsidies. But what did Castro create? Nothing. His entire economy depended on freebies provided by the Soviet Union.
There are good things about capitalism and socialism, and societies need combination of both, but Cook's worldview is simply, "It failed because socialism wasn't allowed to take over totally." Has he forgotten about how the Chinese rejected Maoism? How the Soviet Union collapsed? Communism doesn't work. Also, history teaches us that capitalism isn't a universal panacea either. While capitalism allows for great freedom and opportunity in business, it is also fiercely competitive, and some nations are bound to do better than others(or some groups in any nation are bound to do better than others). So, Hindus are far more adept at business than blacks in Africa. Chinese, with their generally higher-IQ population, have done better with capitalism, along with Japanese. In contrast, low-IQ nations failed with capitalism. Chinese have also done much better under capitalism than the native populations of Philippines and Southeast Asia.

Anyway, socialism isn't some panacea. I know socialists feel justified in pontificating about it because socialism is about 'social justice', but the world doesn't work simply on the basis of chest-thumping 'good will' and 'righteousness'. The fact is too many Latin American nations are too diverse, too divided, too low in IQ, and etc. to succeed with either capitalism or socialism. So, both libertarians and socialists are wrong when they apply their theories on the global scale. The best that such nations can hope for is a kind of humanist national neo-fascism where elites instill the people with some positive national character. It won't fix problems overnight but can set the nation forth on a sound long-term path that favors the right kind of genes and habits. Bolsonaro isn't such a character because he's essentially a lout.

Within days of Corbyn’s election to the Labour leadership, the Times newspaper – the voice of the British establishment – published an article quoting a general, whom it refused to name, warning that the British army’s commanders had agreed they would sabotage a Corbyn government. The general strongly hinted that there would be a military coup first.

It's about the Jews. Jews hate Corbyn because he's pro-Palestinian. It's not about socialism. Jews and British oligarchs don't fear socialism because they can easily pull strings to undermine it, like they've done under both Blair and Cameron. What they can't stomach is how Corbyn gave moral support to Palestinians and Muslims opposed to Neocon wars. That is the good side of Corbyn. And his socialism isn't bad either. But he too is an idiot because he's for mass colonization of UK by Africans and Muslims. Ironically, even as he denounces Zionist colonization of West Bank, he totally supports the Third World colonization of the UK. This is why being a socialist isn't enough. One must be a social-nationalist.

Finally, the problem of putting socialism or class consciousness at the center of meaning is that class is too fluid. Consider all the immigrants in the US who began on the bottom but whose children rose to the top. If someone has a working-class father but becomes a rich person, what should be his 'class consciousness'? There are legit class interests, but class is not a deep identity(and ever-changing along with technology). Also, a society cannot function with a single class; communism tried to utter failure. It's natural to have several classes(and many sub-classes) due to differences in talent and specialization of tasks. So, how can the various classes co-exist and cooperate? With nationalism. Nationalism instills the elites with the sense that the masses are part of the national family to guide than merely economic units to exploit. And nationalism instructs the masses that the rich elites are okay as long as they use their wealth and talent for the good of the national community.
But globalism undermined this. Globo-elites, libertarian or proggy, pretend to care for ALL humanity, but that is of course impossible. So, they end up making noises but doing nothing except fill their own pockets... like Bono. It's like a parent who neglects his own children by pontificating that he loves all the children in the world. All talk, no walk.

The best societies are ones where socialism serves nationalism. The cooperation among the classes based on shared identity, trust, and culture of responsibility. Globalism and Diversity undermine all this.