How the World Went from Universal Nationalism to Universal Imperialism, and the Hidden Empire of Judea

 

Nationalism is the best defense against imperialism.

Nationalism means a people minding their own business. It means having national sovereignty and respecting the sovereignties of other nations.

Imperialism, in contrast, means trampling on the rights and independence of other nations.

If National Socialism had remained in nationalist mode, it wouldn’t have disrupted the world order. But it went into imperialist mode and trampled on and violated the rights of self-determination and self-rule among other nations.

Initially, Japan modernized for nationalist reasons. Threatened by British and American imperialism, it emulated Western science & technology to defend the homeland.
But it went from nationalism to imperialism upon the realization that the great powers were conquering and dividing the world among themselves. In order for Japan to compete and command the respect of other great powers, it too entered the imperial game. Furthermore, the UK and US, two imperialist powers, welcomed Japan into the imperialist club as a counterbalance to expanding Russia and unstable China.

Prior to the emergence of modern nationalism, much of the world had been divided among the great powers with little regard for established borders. Indeed, it had been so since time immemorial. Power and might decide the boundaries and limits of power. So, Persians conquered and laid claim to huge swaths of territory, even areas inhabited mostly by non-Persians. Same with the Romans, Mongols, Russians, Ottomans, and the Western European empires. There was no established principle in the world that insisted on a Basic Right of security, ownership, independence, and self-rule. Jews did have the concept of the Covenant and Holy Land(promised to them by God), but this ‘right’ meant nothing to the greater empires that dwarfed the Jews.

Security could only be assured by might. There was no universal ideal or international law agreed upon by all the peoples of the world. And no global institution existed to enforce higher principles. For most of history, peoples were too busy conquering, defending, adventuring, or discovering to think in terms of universal political morality for all humanity. If a kingdom or state was sufficiently powerful and ambitious, it could embark on invasions and control of more territory. It was about grabbing more and more until met by an equal or greater force or exhausted of resources.

But then, there was the rise of modern nationalism in Britain, France, the US, then followed by Germany, Italy, and Japan. Modern nationalism was a noble development insofar as it obligated the national elites to represent, serve, and defend the national people AND ignited the nascent idea that a nation had a RIGHT to land, security, and independence. Nationalism made national autonomy a right in terms of ideals and principles. Indeed, the main theme of the American Revolution was the idea of the colonists right to break away from the British Empire and establish a free and independent nation-as-republic. Even kings and noblemen who’d resisted the French Revolution and defeated Napoleon eventually adopted the nationalist model as a means to modernize and unite the populace, who went from being subjects of monarchs to the ‘free people’ represented by monarchs.

However, due to the long legacy of imperialism(stretching back to the beginning of history itself) and the relative backwardness around the world, modern nationalism inherited the ambition for empire-building. This led to a contradiction. Even as nationalism defended the homeland from other nations and empires, it sought to expand its own imperial base.
So, Japanese nationalism went from defending Core Japan to conquering and claiming other lands that were non-Japanese. Earlier, the British had gone from securing an Island Nation-Kingdom to conquering other territories that would eventually constitute a gigantic world empire. Though a nation born of independence from the British Empire, the US went from creating a new nation out of the wilderness in the New World to searching overseas for imperial domination, especially after the defeat of the Spanish Empire.

Western Imperialist expansion was hardly unique as most of the non-West was no stranger to the imperial mode of constant invasions and counter-invasions. The non-West however lacked the nationalist ideal of (1) elites-and-peoples bound by historical and cultural covenant(which would have made foreign invasions more difficult) and (2) the political principle of the rightness of national autonomy and self-determination. Their political philosophy was essentially might-is-right. When the Brits invaded the territories of what came to be known as ‘India’, they merely usurped dominance from the Muslim Mughals.

But, World War I and especially World War II dealt a serious blow to the imperialist model. Nazi imperialism and Japanese imperialism, following the second world conflict, were not only defeated at huge cost but denounced as epitomes of evil. Also, it wasn’t long before almost all Third World folks demanded their own national independence, waged wars of liberation, and eventually expelled the European imperialists(sometimes with moral support from the US or the material support of the Soviets). And the Vietnamese fought a long hard battle to drive the US from what had once been ‘Indochina’.
Granted, much of the Third World demand for national independence was possible only as the byproduct of global transformation by the European powers that, via modern communication & transportation, as well as archaeology and education of the local elites, instilled a new consciousness among the non-West of a larger sense of collective identity, unity, and pride. In many cases, the very ‘nations’ seeking independence were the creations of Western Imperialism, such as Indonesia, much of the Middle East, and all of Sub-Saharan Africa.

With the end of WWII, there was the gold standard of Universal Nationalism. The new consensus was that EVERY people deserved to have a safe and secure homeland. Such an ideal had been expounded by Woodrow Wilson following World War I, but it didn’t go far because the Great European powers weren’t about to abandon their empires, without which they’d lose their great power status as their homelands were limited in territory, resources, and population.
And as the West set the template, Japan was determined to have an empire too. This all came crashing down after the horrors of WWII in which Europeans themselves suffered the ignominy of imperialist domination and rule under Nazi Germany(followed by Eastern Europeans under Soviet domination, though in a way, Western Europeans, though freer and richer, fell under US hegemony, which lasts to this day and, following the end of the Cold War, expanded to the borders of Russia.)

Due to the Imperialist Legacy, modern nationalism developed as nationalism + imperialism for some nations. If some European nations were content to remain and defend their own territories, others had embarked on imperial ventures long before the rise of nationalism. Thus, French nationalism inherited the French empire and valued it as a source of prestige and power. This was a system of ‘Nationalism for me, but not for thee’. The modern British and French were proud nationalists at home but sought to suppress and crush nationalist consciousness in their subject peoples though, contradictorily, their extensive archaeological studies of other cultures led to a reawakening of historical memory and pride among the locals. Consider Angkor Wat in Cambodia and the Pyramids of Egypt.

But with the eventual fall of empires following WWII, the new template was “Nationalism for me and for thee.” Let each and every nation, big or small, powerful or weak, rich or poor, be free and independent. And this was to be a moral right. In the New Order, the richest, biggest, and most powerful nation had no right to conquer and claim a small, weak and poor nation. At the very least, as a matter of principle, even the biggest nation and smallest nation were equal in its universal right to national self-determination. After all, there was a reason why the world body of international law came to be known as the United Nations than United Empires. And the Cold War provided some degree of protection for the weaker nations, e.g. the Cuban Revolution couldn’t have survived without Soviet support, and the Southeast Asian nations leaned to the US for protection against subversion from Red China, while North Vietnam relied on the support of the USSR and China to fend off American Neo-Imperialism. And as long as the Soviet Union existed as the other superpower, the US thought twice about getting entangled in the Middle East.

In the post-WWII era, many progressives and liberals were supportive of the national liberation struggles in Vietnam, Algeria, and Cuba for independence and autonomy. And when Soviet tanks rolled into Czechoslovakia, it was the last draw for many Western Leftists who denounced it as a communist form of imperialism.

Still, the US and USSR towered over the world as the two great empires. Of course, neither admitted that its version of world domination was imperialistic. Soviets insisted their hegemony was about the brotherhood of man under communist ideology. And the US claimed to serve as the defender of the Free World.
And, if their apologists did detect elements of imperialism in the US or Soviet world order, they argued it was different from the Bad Old Imperialism. It was imperialism-as-necessary-evil against either Communist Tyranny or Capitalist Exploitation. So, even if Pax Americana was an empire, it was a noble containment strategy against the insatiable fanaticism of communism. Or, the Soviet empire was praised for lending support to peoples around the world seeking independence from the exploitation by Western capitalism(via ‘neo-imperialism’). At any rate, the assumption was that the justification for imperialism-as-necessary-evil would fade once the Evil Empire(communist or capitalist) finally vanished from the world.

Eventually, the Cold War did end with the collapse of the Soviet Union and the emergence of nations no longer under the Soviet-Russian yoke: Lithuania, Estonia, Georgia, Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, and etc. It appeared that universal nationalism came to prevail over Soviet Imperialism. Russians(under the supervision of Jewish globalist carpetbaggers) now ruled over Russia, not over other peoples with their national autonomies restored.

With the end of the Cold War, many people, Americans and non-Americans alike, hoped that the US empire would wind down as well. After all, the Imperial Uncle Sam had been justified on grounds of containing and, if possible, rolling back the Soviet empire. With no more Soviet Empire, what need would there be for the US empire?

Maybe just maybe, the US empire could have come to an end, and America would have returned to the nationalist mode: The US minds its own business, and other nations mind their own business, and, as good neighbors, all nations trade with one another, share ideas, and communicate. Fences make for good neighbors. And, bridges among nations are supposed to facilitate the transport of ideas and goods, not to allow for mass migration and neo-colonization.

But three developments kept the US in the imperial game.

1. The US got filled with the hubris of End of History. Having won the Cold War, the American elites thought the American Way was the only way. In terms of political philosophy, mass culture, economic theory, and military prowess, the idea was that America, as the ‘exceptional’ and ‘indispensable’ nation, has the right to ‘lead’ and ‘defend’ the world. “If you’re not with us, you’re against us.” My way or the highway.

2. The West’s cult of mass immigration as not only an economic necessity but a moral imperative resulted in all-out mass invasions of white nations by the Third World. This had a profound impact on world consciousness as nonwhites, who’d previously demanded and fought for nationalism and independence, came to devalue nationalism in favor of a new kind of imperialism, a globo-mutual-imperialism. As nonwhites figured it is so much easier to have a good life by moving to the West than by working as patriots to reform and develop their own nations, they effectively became champions of demographic imperialism and mass-colonization. The West was given carte blanche to militarily occupy, financially dominate, and culturally influence most of the world in exchange for opening its borders to the whole world, thereby allowing the children of non-white immigrants to rise up and attain status and stake in the US-led world order.

Once, like Fareed Zakaria or Nikki Haley, they gained elite positions in the West, they became cheerleaders for the globo-imperialist warmongering against non-white peoples. After WWII, peoples in the Third World sympathized with one another in what they regarded as a common struggle against White Imperialism. But in the Age of Globalist Empire, nonwhites who rose up the ranks in the West came to function as servitors of the Zionist-controlled Empire against non-white nations. Having been groomed & appropriated by the West(that serves the Empire of Zion) and flush with status & privilege, the likes of Haley and Zakaria are more than happy to cheer on the bombing of nations like Libya, Syria, Iraq, and etc.

As for the EU, by some estimates Brussels is already one-third Muslim and is expected to become majority non-white in a few decades. As nonwhites settled in the West, they identified neither with their nations-of-origin or with white Westerners. Many came to exist in an ideological limbo of globalism, a kind of Universal Imperialism.
Take Francis Fukuyama, the man who announced the triumph of ‘liberal democracy’ as the End of History. He’s no longer Japanese in any meaningful sense, but he’s not part of the White West either. He resides in the lala-land-of-the-mind called End-of-Historia. And Amy Chua feels as a member of what she calls the ‘supergroup’.

Perhaps, one reason why former imperialist Western nations became so pro-immigration was their subconscious desire to justify past imperialism. After all, imperialism once spread diversity around the world (permanently in Latin America), and the anti-imperialist impetus was essentially anti-diversity. Algerians and Vietnam eventually rejected and resisted the Diversity of European colonizers, just like Palestinians did everything they could to stem the flow of Invasive Diversity of Zionist colonizers. And Tibetans certainly aren’t happy about the mass-migratory Diversity of Han Chinese who keep flooding into Tibet.
Anyway, by welcoming demographic imperialism from non-white nations, former white imperialist nations could be subconsciously defending their past imperialist record of having imposed Diversity on subject territories that could not say NO to the well-armed European colonizers and their collaborators… like Hindus who followed in the heels of British Imperialists into Africa and Southeast Asia. Diversity = imperialism. Homogeneity = nationalism.

3. Another reason why the US empire grew bigger and more aggressive was because Jews became the new ruling elites of America. Why did this matter? Because Jewish power is essentially and intrinsically imperialist. As Jews are a minority elite in the US, they don’t identify with most Americans who are seen as dumb and filthy goyim, the untermensch. Jews regard themselves as superior to goyim and mainly identify with other Jews in other nations. So, from the perspective of Jewish supremacists, gentile nationalism is feared and loathed as independence and autonomy from Jewish Hegemony, just like the British Imperialists regarded the nascent nationalism among the American colonists as a threat to British Imperialist hegemony. Jews fear and loathe gentile nationalism as an hindrance to Jewish globalist networking for Jewish supremacist hegemony. After all, if goyim put their own people and culture first and foremost, their nation would take precedence over Israel and Jewish interests.

Jews are like the British imperialists who feared the rise of nationalist consciousness in Third World nations. The British elites didn’t feel an affinity with the native majority in any of the subject domains. Their affinity was with the Mother Country and to the network of British Imperialists around the world. British Imperial power could sustain itself only by making the subject peoples mainly ‘identify’ with British Imperial prestige than with local national concerns.

Kenyan nationalism meant Kenyans asserting authority against the British rulers. It meant Kenyans should defend and serve their black identity in their own nation than the global ambitions of the British imperialists. Indian nationalism meant the brown people of the subcontinent demanding self-rule & self-determination and, furthermore, asking the Brits to leave. As Gandhi said:

If the British were about ‘Nationalism for me but not for thee’(or imperialist-nationalism), Gandhi was about universal nationalism, or ‘Nationalism for me and for thee’. The British feared universal nationalism as a viral threat to their own brand of imperialism, one in which only the British had national independence as well as imperial pride. After all, if every non-white domain(or Ireland for that matter) of the British Empire insisted on national autonomy, how could British hegemony be sustained?

Today, Jews think and act like the British imperialists. Most Jews don’t feel a shared sense of identity, history, or destiny with gentile nationals in the US, Canada, Poland, France, UK, Germany, Brazil, and etc. To Jewish minorities(elites or otherwise) in such nations, most of the people are just seen as replaceable and interchangeable filthy goy untermensch. To sustain Jewish supremacism, Jews suppress goy nationalism. Consider how David Brooks and William Kristol are obsessed with keeping Israel as a Jewish ethno-state BUT they’d love to see whites in Europe, US, and Canada reduced to minorities in their lands of their ancestors. And hideous Jewish supremacists like Max Boot and Jennifer Rubin think gentiles exist as cannon fodders in the endless Wars for Israel. To Jews, goyim are little more than cattle. Jews look upon gentiles like ruling pigs look upon other barn creatures in George Orwell’s ANIMAL FARM.

Jews now practice Imperialist Nationalism of ‘Nationalism for me but not for thee’. So, Jews say all Western nations must support Israel as a JEWISH STATE but also insist that white gentile nations must abandon nationalism(even one that says ‘for me and for thee’) because gentiles exist to serve Jewish power first and foremost. Jews don’t want gentile nationalism to come between Jewish Supremacism and White Submissivism.
Also, Jews push for Mass Invasion(aka ‘immigration’) to turn the native white majority populations into minorities in their own nations. That way, Jews can control the native majority by guilt-baiting them with accusations of ‘racism’ for being insufficiently ‘welcoming’ of non-white mass invaders and leeches. And as the nation grows ever more diverse, Jewish Imperial elites hope to play divide-and-rule by pitting nonwhites against whites, whites against nonwhites, nonwhites against nonwhites(as they are racially diverse), and whites against whites(as they’re ideologically divided).

This is why Jews fear being ‘gandhi-ed’ out of the West. Indeed, what would happen if white folks woke up and told the Jewish supremacist-imperialists, “It’s time you left”? What if whites decided on mass civil disobedience against Jewish Power? Say NO to the Wars for Zion. Goycott Jewish Hollywood, Goycott Jewish media, Goycott Jewish-run businesses that are hostile to whites, Goycott Jewish Casinos. No to Zion. Time to tear down the Zion Curtain. That would surely make the Jews sweat. As the Hindus(against Brits), blacks(against Segregation), and National Socialists(against Jews) proved, boycotting businesses can be very effective. Palestinians are leading the way with BDS. Of course, Jews use Economic Warfare all the time. Consider how Jews use the West to sanction Iran and Russia. Consider how MAGA types have been debanked and deplatformed and hit with endless lawfare. Donald Trump is being stripped of all his wealth. (Of course, the sad sack of shit is still bending over to take it up his arse from the Zionic dong.)

As it stands, Jewish imperialism is far more insidious and dangerous than British imperialism. At the very least, British Imperialism, like the French or Spanish kind, was OUT IN THE OPEN. It wasn’t denied. If anything, the British made a splashy pageant of it 24/7. Brits were singing anthems about how Britain rules one third of the globe. So, there was NO DOUBT as to the nature of the British Empire.

In contrast, Judea is a Hidden Empire. Even though the biggest power in the world is the Jewish Global Network — most US politicians, academics, media people, and etc. are agents or shills of Zion — , Jewish power uses goy countries as fronts to carry out its vile deeds. So, even though the Power of Zion was behind the war on Syria, Westerners have been led to believe the US and EU are only trying to get rid of Assad as the ‘butcher of Syria’ and gasser-of-children. Jewish supremacists are craven but cunning arseholes who use their vast capital to manipulate, bribe, and threaten OTHERS to do the fighting and dying.

It was very different in the Age of the British Empire. Everyone knew the British were in command of using their proxies and subjects to further British Imperial interest. So, even when Brits recruited and ordered Indian, African, and Arab troops to fight in wars, no one would have thought India, Kenya, or Arabia were leading the charge. Everyone would have known that those non-white forces were doing the bidding of the British.
But, because the Empire of Judea is a Hidden Empire, so many people fall for the charade that ‘liberal democratic’ Western nations have freely chosen to wage these Wars for Human Rights, which are really the Wars for the Hidden Empire of Zion. The UK and France are essentially vassal nations of the US that is a vassal whore of the Empire of Judea.

The problem with MAGA was never nationalism. If the US had chosen the nationalist path — what Pat Buchanan called ‘republic, not an empire’ — after the end of the Cold War, the world would be a safer and better place. Just think. Suddenly, the Soviet Union was gone, and Russia was no longer a threat and sought political and economic cooperation with the world. If Anglo-Americans or WASPs had kept the power, maybe something could have been worked out.
But Jews were rapidly gaining elite dominance in the US in the 80s and 90s. And Jewish attitude toward Russians was hardly different from their attitude toward white Americans: Both are mere cattle, replaceable and interchangeable.
To Judeo-Nazis, white Russians and white Americans are filthy goyim, or untermensch, more akin to dogs, horses, cattle.

So, the hope of Russia’s transition from communism to a market economy was wasted. Jewish globalists held the reins of ‘reform’ in Russia and economically plundered the nation in the 1990s. Also, Billy Boy Clinton, a shill of Jewish globalists, pushed NATO right up to Russia’s borders.
Jews figured, “Don’t let a crisis go to waste.” Jews exploited the End of the Cold War for their own nefarious interests. Instead of having the US empire retreat with the fall of the Soviet empire, Jews took advantage of America-as-sole-superpower to consolidate control over the EU and Russia. Thus, European nations soon became mere vassal-states in a few generations. Also, clever Jews manipulated the vanity of warriors like John McCain and ‘thinkers’ like Samantha Powers into believing that they, as redemptive gentile leaders of the ‘exceptional’ and ‘indispensable’ nation, were entitled to the right of Enlightened Empire Building to remake the whole world in their image.

Of course, Jewish directed the power of the US mostly toward Jewish-Supremacist agendas, which is why most of US aggression has been directed at the Middle East, North Africa, and Ukraine(or Pale of Settlement). Consider how Jewish power directed the US to use sanctions, invasions, and even the support for Jihadi terrorists to undermine stability in the Middle East, all for the supremacist interests of Israeli hegemony. Jews, in their perversity, even went so far as to strike up an alliance with sub-Nazi forces in Ukraine as battering ram against Russia.

Donald Trump in 2016 ran on nationalism that promised to end or severely limit American ventures overseas. Prior to his administration, the US had already been the imperialist wrecker of Iraq, Libya, Syria(where CIA aided Al Qaeda, the very people who were accused of carrying out 9/11), and the recruiter of Neo-Nazi elements to pull off a coup in Ukraine.
Trump sounded good during the campaign, but the Deep State circled him like sharks and forced his hand to do the bidding of the Empire of Judea instead of focusing on the problems at home, like the broken southern border.

Globalist ‘humanitarians’ say the rich and powerful US shouldn’t be so self-absorbed and instead help other nations. But their idea of ‘humanitarian’ intervention mostly comes down to destroying nations hated by Jews. And the bulk of US foreign aid is more money for Israel to keep on crushing Palestinians and destabilizing the Middle East with threats and attacks.

Jews hate the idea of American nationalism because it means the goy sheeple of the US will no longer go baaaaah and support Wars for Zion. Also, the theme of American Nationalism would be, “American leaders must do what is good for MOST Americans(most of whom are not Jewish).” Jews hate the notion because Jews feel zero affinity with goy Americans. Jews want the bulk of American resources and energy to be channeled toward sustaining the globalist hegemony of Jewish Power. The mentality of Jews isn’t much different from that of an absolute monarch. The king expects the people to serve him, not vice versa. The Jewish 2% expects the gentile 98% to serve them, not vice versa.

The world needs universal nationalism more than ever. Nationalism for Me and for Thee. But as long as Jewish power rules the West, it remains difficult. Jews fear gentile nationalism because it undermines the neo-imperial globalist Jewish hegemony of the US.

To better understand the Jewish mindset as a microcosm, consider the Israel-Palestine conflict. How nice it’d be if Jews went for ‘Nationalism for Me and for Thee’ with their Palestinian neighbors. Jews would have Israel as their homeland, and Palestinians would have the West Bank as their homeland. But nope, Jewish power summons the support of the West to crush Palestinian nationalism while maximizing their own nationalism with massive walls and military violence. It is a form of Imperialist Nationalism: ‘Nationalism for Me but not for Thee.’ So unjust.

‘Nationalism for Me but not for Thee’ is like the logic of American Slavery, which was ‘Freedom for Me but not for Thee.’ Abolitionists began to ask, if white folks should be free, why not blacks too?
Likewise, if Israel has the right to be free and independent as a Jewish state, why doesn’t Hungary have the right to be free and independent as a Hungarian nation? Sorosian Jews call upon the West to praise and support Zionist nationalism but then pressure the EU to sanction and destroy Hungary for having chosen national survival and self-determination.

We know why things are so. Because Jews seek to maximize their own tribal power, they seek to weaken the ethno-national power of all other peoples who will then be coerced to serve Jewish globalist hegemony.

Anyway, how depressing that Trump, who ran on nationalism and an end to globo-imperialism of US interventionism, was pressured by the Deep State Zionists and Military Industrial Complex to continue with the same old same old, which is sucking up to Jewish Supremacists.
The US continues to occupy much of desperate Syria. The US accuses Russia of meddling in Western affairs — who can forget the Russia Collusion Hoax? — and harboring aggressive global ambitions when, in fact, the Jewish-controlled US is the #1 meddler in other national elections and the invader & destroyer of Iraq & Libya and an enabler of terrorists in Syria and Ukraine. When will this madness ever end?

The US is like India under the British. Sikh Indians joined in all the British Wars. When the British fought in Africa, Middle East, WWI, and WWII, Indian soldiers served under ‘queen and country’ that wasn’t their own. Indians had no agency. The US is under Jewish imperialism & cuck to Jewish wars. A jewel in the crown for the Jews. White Americans are now the Sikh Men of the West.

Anyway, the overall arc of history is as follows.

1. Imperialism. The mighty dominate and rule over all others. Might is right.

2. National Imperialism. The right of one’s own nation to be safe and secure from invasions but no such rights granted to other peoples. Example: Japan defended itself from other empires but advanced into China. ‘Nationalism for me but not for thee.’

3. Universal Nationalism. The right of each nation/people/culture to be free and independent. Nationalism for all peoples of the world as the core basis for international cooperation. It is the Template that emerged from the ashes of WWII and the end of European and Japanese empires. ‘Nationalism for me and for thee’.

4. Universal Imperialism. The right of great powers to militarily, financially, and culturally invade and transform other nations: Drop bombs, take over banks, bribe politicians, and spread Homomania as the new crusading faith. In turn, the great powers must welcome vast demographic invasions by the rest of the world. ‘Imperialism for me and for thee.’ It’s great for Jews who control Western banks and whore politicians of the US & EU and who seek to use increased Diversity in the West to play divide-and-rule among goyim.
We see this dynamic playing out between the EU and the Middle East. The EU supports the Zionist-US invasions of the Middle East and then welcomes millions of Muslim ‘refugees’ displaced by those invasions. The EU becomes demographically invaded in turn.

Boomer cucks did immeasurable harm to the US, the West, and whites by cucking to Jews and Israel and ceding all power and moral authority to the Jews. Had white boomers been more adversarial and pushed back against Jewish Supremacism, the Jewish supremacist cancer wouldn’t have spread so fast and far. Sadly, instead of atoning for their epic error in judgment, the boomer cucks are doubling down on their cuckage to Israel in the latest bloodbath in the Holy Land.

How things might change if white people took inspiration from the Palestinians.
Palestinians are weak and small in number but full of fight and courage. Whites are big and powerful in number but filled with craven brown-nosing cuckery.
If Palestinian Defiance were combined with White Potential, Jews would be finished.
Palestinians cannot beat the Jews. But, whites with the Palestinian spirit could beat the Jews. If whites grew defiant and stood up to Jews and finally realized that Zion is their enemy, Jews would lose white support, and then Jewish Power would be over. Jewish Power must feed on white submission and support. If whites were to wake up and say NO MORE to Jewish Wars in Ukraine and Middle East, Jewish terror and tyranny would fade from the world that could enter a new golden age.
Palestinians are weak politically and militarily but they do have something priceless: truth and courage. They know Jews are their enemy and have the guts to fight even after Jews pound them again and again. Whites are potentially the most powerful people on Earth but have fallen in grace in the US and EU because they cravenly cuck to Jews, their main tormentors. Just imagine the promise of Palestinian Guts + White Potential? If whites thought and acted like Palestinians, Jewish Power would be kaput sooner than later.
What have whites gained by sucking up to Jews? Whites may have thought Jews would be nice to them if whites aided and abetted the Jewish destruction of Palestine. But what happened? Whites only fed the beast of Jewish greed, supremacism, and hubris, and Jews are now looking to push WHITE NAKBA to diversify the West itself so that goyim can be divided-and-ruled. White Cucking to Jews since WWII has been the biggest tragedy of Western Civilization. Learn from the Palestinians. White Intifada against White Nakba.

The Power of Racination vs the Weakness of Deracination. Tale of Two White Groups: The Racinating Jews and Deracinating European-Americans

Especially since the end of World War II(though the general process began much earlier), white people in America could be lumped into mainly two groups. European-Americans(or ‘whites’) and Jews. Jews have long been considered as white people in the US even though most ‘full-blooded’ Jews(Ashkenazim) tend to be 50% Semitic. One could argue that many Hispanics are more white than Jews are. ‘Hispanics’ in America can be of any race, color, or nationality as long as they are of Latin American descent. Given that Italians(especially from Southern Italy) and Greeks are genetically more similar to many Jews than to Northern Europeans, it may seem odd that they too are being lumped with ‘white people’ while Jews increasingly stand apart. Furthermore, due to acceleration of mixed-marriages among Jews since the 1960s, a good many of today’s Jews are more European than ever and look it. Apparently, many successful Jewish men in the past 50 yrs married European-American women. Indeed, Jewish-Americans range from almost entirely white to almost entirely Semitic, and the proof is in the looks. Some Jews look more Anglo or Nordic than Semitic, while some Jews look like Groucho Marx and Alan Dershowitz. Given these racial or interracial complications, why does it makes sense, politically and culturally, to speak of Two White Americas, Jewish and ‘white’? It has to do with the factor of ‘Racination’ vs ‘Deracination’.

While it’s true that race is real and even biologically based, everything human is also about consciousness. Consider blackness. It’s biologically real that black races evolved in Sub-Saharan Africa. And yet, consciousness about blackness can change from place to place, from period to period. This is further complicated by mixed-race-ness. How people with black blood respond to their blackness differs from Brazil to Venezuela to Mexico(where most blacks became mixed into the racial brew) to the US. A light-skinned person with some blackness may identify as mixed-race or quadroon or octaroon in Brazil as such response has been the general norm. But in the US, he or she may identify fully as black for reasons of racial pride or solidarity(or exaggerated self-aggrandizing self-pity). But that is in the NOW. In the past, when the US was more race-ist, a light-skinned black person might have considered himself/herself as superior to darker blacks. Or, if possible, a light-skinned black with mostly white looks would have tried to ‘pass’ as white’. Consciousness of blackness used to be of shame than pride in the slavery era. So, cultural-consciousness of the ideological Zeitgeist goes a long way to determine whether a people emphasize(and even exaggerate) their racial/ethnic consciousness OR suppress(and even erase & deny) it.
Perhaps the most famous(and maybe shameful) case was of Germans in the US and UK during World War I. Germans have many virtues, but their subordination to authority and anxiety for social approval have been problematic. On the positive side, it could make them more unified in politics and united in purpose. But it could also mean a herd-like willingness to do anything to GO ALONG. Ironically, both German hyper-deracination in the US & UK and ultra-racination in Nazi Germany have an underlying common psychological structure. In both cases, German masses were swayed by the prevailing authority. German-Americans and German-Britons folded under pressure and out of fear all too easily. Germans under German Nationalism rallied en masse in total devotion to Der Fuhrer, the Man of the Hour, the Man of Destiny. In one respect, one could say German-Americans blended easily into Anglo-America and Anglo-Britain because of racial likeness and also because Anglos accepted them as racial brethren, indeed more than any other people. But given the rich and proud history of German Civilization & Culture, it seems rather shameful that, under pressure of a few years, so many Germans were willing to erase and suppress so much of their rich identity and culture. It was one thing for Germans to learn English and become Good Americans and Good Britons in foreign lands. But to go so far as repress or reject so much of Germanness except ‘harmless’ cultural identifiers such as beer, sausage, sauerkraut, and pretzel seems almost incredible. There are so many Americans of German stock who have nothing German about them in historical or cultural consciousness(except maybe in Holocaust Guilt). If Germans had been a tiny minority, it wouldn’t matter. But, for a long time, they were the biggest ethnic minority and contributed so much to the building of the US.
From a political viewpoint, perhaps it was a good thing that German-Americans became nearly fully Anglo-Americanized for the sake of national unity. As European Conflicts pitted Anglos against Germans in the first half of the 20th century, perhaps the US avoided similar ethno-national tensions because German identity had been successfully suppressed and subsumed into Anglo-America, especially during World War I when harsh measures were taken against the German-American community. But politics aside, what’s rather depressing is that so many Germans really took it to heart and waged war on their own identity. Germans rejected their identity beyond what was called for. It’s like there were times when Jews, under social or political pressure, had to pretend to just along. But apart from their external behavior, Jews never surrendered their Core Identity of Jewishness. Jews went along in body, not in soul. But German-Americans rejected their identity like Lutherans purge their souls of the Devil.
Does this mean that religion is stronger than race or ethnicity? Not necessarily. More likely, race + religion is the strongest identity. Jews have held steadfast onto the idea of the Covenant with God. And this sense of the Covenant, more than any political policy by Jews or ‘whites’, may have been most crucial in the resilience of (sacro-)racial identity of Jews. Wherever, whenever, and whatever, Jews primarily see themselves as Jews. They may be ‘Americans’, ‘Frenchmen’, ‘Polish’, ‘Russian’, ‘Iranian’, ‘Egyptian’, or whatever, as there are Jews all over the world, BUT the goy nationality is merely the dress that Jews wear. In flesh and blood, Jews are Jews. If an American Jew was forced to choose between being only American(and not Jewish) OR Jewish(fixed to another goy nationality), he will choose the latter. Jews value Americanism as the vehicle that brought them to supreme power. But it’s a tool, not their heart and soul. Also, as just about anyone can become an ‘American’(in mere five yrs necessary for citizenship), it’s not a very meaningful identity anymore. It is a means to material success, privilege, opportunities, and power. If something is open to everyone, it doesn’t really belong to anyone. America has become a Globo-Cow for all the world to squeeze for milk. The teats for treats for the world. And Jews now have primary ownership of the cow. Just like a farmer doesn’t identify himself as a cow even though he profits handsomely from it, when a Jew says he’s an ‘American’, it means something like "I’m a dairy farmer." ‘American’, to a Jew, is more an occupation, status, or position than an identity. The Jew’s true identity is Jewishness, not least because it is richly rooted in deep history, and it belongs to Jews alone. It is immutable, therefore precious to Jews. It is Jewishness, the binding of religion and race, that has made Jews unique throughout history(though there are elements of that in Hinduism as well, another ethno-religion. But if caste-less Judaism bound all Jews together as one people, the powerful caste-element left behind a much divided and fractured India). Religion is powerful but mainly a matter of faith, of the heart. Also, universal religions are mutable and thus weaken tribal or racial identity. After all, no race or identity owns Christianity, Buddhism, or Islam. Religions can impart meaning and inspire people to noble deeds, but in emphasizing the heart over blood, it does little for identity, roots, and history.
As for tribalism, it too has its advantages and weaknesses. Naturally tribal, people like being part of a common community that comprises members of similar looks, alike temperaments, and shared signifiers. But tribalism as mere tribalism can be crude and ham-fisted, a vision of the world where it all boils down to ‘my tribe(or country), right or wrong’. Such emotions may be powerful but not very ennobling, and in worst cases, dark and despicable, as in wars when nations mercilessly kill countless civilians of one another in an orgy of tit-for-tat macro-tribal vendetta. The great advantage of Jewishness is that their religion is wedded to their race. So, when Jews think of God, He isn’t just a universal abstraction but their own God, the one and only Deity who made them the Chosen. Also, because Jews believe that their race is blessed by God and History, they regard serving their own tribe as a spiritual and moral endeavor. As far as Jews are concerned, the world can only be blessed by Jews, the Chosen. So, Jews must reach the top and gain the most power in order for the rest of humanity to be redeemed(by serving Jews). Indeed, rest of humanity must aid and abet Jews in this endeavor because Jews are the Chosen of God. Jews claim to be for universal justice, but Jewishness can only be about Jewish mastery & supremacism since it's premised on the conviction that humanity can't do without Jews, the only people who can redeem and bless the world. The logical conclusion is all goyim must praise and serve Jews as the Master Race because Jews and only Jews deliver justice to the world. But if Jews must be elevated above all of humanity to bring about a just world, isn't that unjust? Isn't it about Jewish supremacism and mastery? (This mentality characterized Jesus as well. He thought humanity could be saved only through Him. But at the very least, Christianity calls on Jews and Gentiles to be equal and alike. In contrast, Judaism posits that each and every Jew is like a messiah who must be obeyed, served, and praised by goyim. Thus, Jews and Gentiles can never be one people; Jews must be the master race over goyim, albeit one that promise justice to goyim. But if a people insist on having total power over you, would you trust them to administer justice on blind faith? US has been a most fascinating macro-experiment in Jewish Power. Jews got near-total power, and what are they doing with it in finance, gambling, entertainment, real estate, law, liberty, pornography, foreign policy, and culture?)

This is why the most important lesson of the 21st century may be that only peoples with their own covenants will survive and grow in power. As it stands, Jews are the ONLY PEOPLE with the Covenant. And that is why their power keeps growing while those of ‘whites’ keep diminishing. Covenant is like the freezer. Frosty the Snowman can survive in the Cold but not in warm weather. Covenant does to identity what freezer does to ice. It keeps it solid. Without the Covenant, identities melt into the puddle under the heat of globalism. White identities are melting like ice outside the freezer. Meanwhile, Jewish ice remains within their own freezer and grow harder and bigger. And this isn’t just a matter of blood but consciousness. While one must have Jewish blood to be Jewish, there is an added element of consciousness. In the US, someone who is 1/4(or even 1/8) Jewish may feel more strongly Jewish than a German-American or Swedish-American who is 100% of his ethnic-stock feels German or Swedish. Why would this be? Why would someone with a fraction of Jewish blood feel so powerfully Jewish while someone who is fully German feels hardly German? The Jewish Covenant, like a freezer, hardens identity. In contrast, even 100% Germans are consciously so deracinated that they don’t know what to make of their German blood, culture, and history. Even Germans in Germany have lost their sense of meaning and purpose. Many of them think German culture is just food, beverage, music, and books, products to be marketed to or shared with the world. And since holy Jews say German history and culture are tainted forever by Holocaust Guilt and ‘racism’, maybe the ONLY way to redeem Germanness is to fully expunge it of its ethno-racial component and turn it into a ‘world identity’, like the Bahai church or Mardi Gras festival in New Orleans.

A perfect demonstration of how Jewishness has been empowered by Racination while whiteness has become dis-empowered(even disemboweled) by Deracination was evinced in Paul Ryan’s last year in Congress. He made much fuss about the need to reject and suppress white identity and white nationalism, but upon discovering through a DNA test that he is 3% Jewish, he was wild and ecstatic with joy that he had some precious Jewish blood. Racination of Jewishness has made even traces of Jewishness precious, like glimmers of gold. But Deracination of whiteness has convinced so many whites that their identity, blood, and roots have NO value. Paul Ryan reacted to the 3% Jewish side of him as if he found a gold nugget in a stream. As for the 97% of him that is white, he just treated it like dirt and sand to wash away. So, there we see the effects of Racination and Deracination on the Human Consciousness.
This is all the more ironic because, for most of the world(and even to Jews), whiteness is the ultimate gold to gain access to. Why do so many non-whites want to migrate(often permanently) to white nations, white-made nations, or white-majority nations? The reasons are many: Economic, political, moral, cultural, sexual, and material. Non-whites feel white people do things better, maintain superior social & economic systems, tend to be more fair-minded, and are more attractive as mates. And deep down inside, Jews know that they rode to supreme power on the Great White Horse. Without Europe and white-made US, would Jews be ruling the world? Could Jews have gained the kind of power and wealth they did on the backs of blacks, Muslims, Asians, or etc.? No, despite their problems with the Christian Europe/West, Jews gained most in association with white civilization that rose to heights of achievement and glory. But the relations between Jews and Europeans were tense, and not only because of religious issues but economic ones. Jews provided invaluable service as moneylenders, but it could also be parasitic and over time, Jews could amass fortunes in an almost exponential way. And Jewish loyalty was always questionable since they always regarded themselves as Jews first. Jews always bitch about discrimination, but their very identity was discriminatory, exclusionary, and even supremacist. Because of the relationship between Europeans and Jews that was, at once, productive & mutually beneficial AND wrought with mutual distrust & contempt — with Jews getting the worse of the conflict(due to numerical disadvantage) when things got out of hand — , Jews are worried that the current white-Jewish partnership may also end badly, even in bloodshed. Jews remember how they got expelled from so many nations as a beleaguered minority. (But then, when Jews had the power, they violently expelled Palestinians from their own homeland. It goes to show that Jewish expulsions were a matter of power, not noble Jewish victimhood. More numerous Europeans pushed out smaller numbers of Jews. What is amazing about the Nakba Pogroms is that the smaller Jewish population pushed out so much of the majority Palestinian population. When Jews got the power, they don’t choose to be noble victims. They prefer being ruthless victors. Of course, in their publicity campaigns, they still play ‘victim’ in the manner of ‘The Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you’.) In order to maintain the partnership between Jews and whites, Jews insist on further racinating Jewishness(with pride of identity, nobility, tragedy, glory, spirituality, and awesomeness) and deracinating whiteness(as ‘nazi’, ‘white supremacist’, ‘evil’, ‘far-right’, ‘extremist’, etc). So, all US politicians singing hosannas to Israel, the US waging Wars for Israel, the media spreading Hate News against ‘enemies of Israel’ and any nation antagonized by Jews, and endless blather about Jewish This & Jewish That is perfectly ‘normal’ and ‘American as Apple Pie’. But, even the sentiment, "It’s Okay to be White" or a supposed ‘white power’ hand sign must be objects of witch-hunts. In other words, Jewishness is so awesome that we must praise and worship it uber alles, whereas whiteness is so wicked that even the slightest whiff of it must be treated like poison and sound the alarm.
And yet, people may wonder... if Jews hate whiteness so much, why don’t they just pick up their stuff and leave? Why don’t Jews depart from white nations and go resettle in non-white world of Africa, Asia, Latin America, and etc.? Get away from whites as far as possible. Indeed, if whites suck so bad, why were Jewish Immigration Patterns so often about GOING WHERE WHITE PEOPLE ARE GOING, GOING WHERE WHITE PEOPLE ARE? And why did Jewish bankers fund white imperialists who colonized other parts of the world? Why did Jews come to the US created by whites who committed ‘genocide’ against Indians? And why do Jews ask white nations above all to support Israel and praise Jews? If whites are so evil and wicked, why do Jews so heavily rely on whites as their main support system? Why do Jews want to associate Jewish interests with White Support? Why taint holy Jewishness with wicked whiteness? It’s like someone cursing Satan and then asking Satan to come to his aid at every turn. It makes no sense, at least on the surface.
What this indicates is that Jews have a love/hate thing with whites. Jews love whiteness as the gold standard of high civilization, social order, technological progress, political stability, and etc. They also lust after whites as the ‘best fuc*’. But this love of whiteness also makes them feel angry and envious. After all, if Jews are indeed the Chosen people, why are whites more attractive and more pleasant? Why do so many Jews look like Anthony Weiner(and act like him too)? Why do Jewish men prefer white women over Jewish women? Why do Jewish women prefer white men over Jewish men? Also, it angers Jews that their religion is relatively ‘petty’ and brutal compared to the loving and embracing universality of Christianity, historically the religion of whites. To resolve the issue, Jews maintain the exclusivity of Jewishness while appropriating the universal aura of Christianity that is more inspiring to all mankind. But how does one remain an exclusionary Jew while pontificating about equal justice for all mankind? How do you preach love and brotherhood while sticking to an identity that says, "WE are the Chosen, not you goy filth." Jews have been unable to resolve the issue, and that’s why we have a crazy kind of neo-universalism in the West. If Christianity offered the hope that ALL peoples could be equally precious in the eyes of God, Holocaustianity or Jew-Worship as universal-faith means All Peoples must bow down before the Jews as the Chosen(or Shoasen). It’s a total perversion of universalism whereby all peoples are made to reject their own tribalism so as to revere the uber-tribalism of the Jews. Same logic operates behind Homomania, a proxy of Jewish Power, the message of which is all the straight and normal people around the world must bend over to a tiny minority of vain sexual deviants whose idea of ‘sex’ is homo-fecal-penetration or whose idea of ‘gender’ is tranny penis-cutting. But then, consider the astronomical ascension of Jewish and Homo power precisely because their identities have been ‘racinated’ or ‘consecrated’ to such extent. Meanwhile, look at the dissipating identities of whites, Europeans, and Japanese who have accepted soulless consumerism and status-competition as their main fixations.
What this teaches us is that genuine universalism of equality is bound to fail. It has never worked. If anything, Jews have taken advantage of universalism to make all the world worship them. The lesson for each and every people is to define, shape, and guard their own identity in terms of race, range, and roots. Blood, soil, and history. Jews certainly gained power by doing just that. And finally, to turn one’s identity into a Covenant, a people need to create a visionary narrative that says they have a special contract with the Great Being, the Ultimate Power of the Universe. If Jews sought it out and got themselves the Covenant, other people can also attain a covenant for themselves through their own prophetic striving. This and only this will secure the existence of a people. It must be race, roots, and range BLESSED BY religion. As Christianity has finally come to an end, there must be an Age of White Prophets who seek the voice of the Ultimate Power, with whom a covenant can be written for the white race and for the white race alone. If Jews have their own Covenant, why shouldn’t whites have one of their own? Christianity failed for the white race in the end because its all-inclusive Covenant belongs to everyone. And if someone can be had by everyone, it belongs to no one in the end. It’s like air we breathe. It doesn’t belong to any of us but to all of us. You are not the air you breathe. You are your blood, your organs, your body, your brains with unique memories and thoughts. Christianity will continue to have meaning and purpose as a religion that preaches certain virtues and teaches certain values, but it has no value as an identity. It can be appreciated as universal oxygen for all the world that wants to breathe some blessed air. But if Europeans and whites are to survive as a people, they need a covenant that is about their particular place and purpose on Earth and in the universe. It is a covenant that must be the stuff of vision and depth but also devoid of hubris and vanity. It must be of both heroism and humility.

Anyway, why did all non-Jewish whites become deracinated in the US while Jews got more racinated? In a way, Jews were always racinated due to the nature of the Covenant. Indeed, Jewishness was always more than a matter of religious faith but of ancestry and memory. But another factor was Jews talked and read more. More talk means Jewish kids heard more from grandparents and parents about past history and heritage. Jews also read more, and they also produced much of their own literature. So, they not only learned much about history and the world but through their own lenses. Also, Jewishness vis-a-vis Christianity had a doubly reinforcing effect. Not only did Jews insist on excluding goyim from their own community but the Christian community regarded Jews as the Other. Even in the US where anti-Jewish feelings were less pronounced, there was a sense of Jewish-Christian Divide that Jews cleverly manipulated because Jews wanted to gain access to the white(esp Wasp) world but didn’t want whites to pry into the Jewish World. The formula has become dangerous in a world shaped by Jewish Supremacism. When Jews weren’t yet dominant in elite fields, the notion of 'Jewish community' simply meant their ethnic enclave or cultural community(like the one featured in Woody Allen's RADIO DAYS or Neil Simon's BRIGHTON BEACH MEMOIRS). As such, there was no reason for non-Jews to stick their noses into Jewish affairs, just like Jews didn’t stick their noses into what was happening in Chinatown or Polish Town. But what happened as the result of more and more Jews entering elite fields to the point where entire elite spheres turned into Jewish Communities? When elite institutions were ruled by Wasps, the Jewish Community was a about neighborhoods and distinct Jewish organizations. A handful of Jews within elite circles didn’t change the equation. But when so many college departments, courts, media outlets, law firms, financial firms, and etc. are so dominated by Jews, it means the elite sphere itself has turned into a Jewish Community. Why is this dangerous? Because elite power has not only been tribalized into Jewish supremacism but into one that cannot be criticized. For example, it’s one thing to let Chinese be Chinese and do their own Chinesey things in dinky Chinatown. People in such a Chinese Community are not going to have power over us. But, suppose this convention of Leaving the Chinese Community Alone is extended to Chinese Power that hypothetically takes over the elite institution and industries of America. Those powerful Chinese will have power over us, but they will be protected from criticism on account that they constitute a 'Chinese Community'. Jewish Community now comprises the globalist-imperialist rulers over us, but we are to pretend that it still constitutes some hapless Jews eking out a living in a poverty-stricken shtetl. Jews in the Jewish Community can do their Jewish things for Jewish reasons. But as elites of a multi-racial and multi-ethnic empire, Jews in high places must take leave of the Jewish-Community-Mentality, but they haven't. They play the New Romans but while eating bagels among themselves than breaking bread with all Americans and humanity.
Jewish Community has gone from Rags to Riches, but we are supposed to see just the rags. Paradoxically, it is Jewish riches that make us see Jews in rags. Jews expend great sums to keep cranking out Holocaust movies that, GROUNDHOG-DAY-like, remind us that Jews are always poor victims of the Holy Holocaust. Jews buy off politicians to give speeches about how Jews are a hapless and powerless people in need of protection. Jews steal land from Palestinians and use IDF death squads to mow down women and children in Gaza, but the Jew-run US narrative is "We must protect Jews from Hamas."

In contrast to Jews, white Americans of all stripes have become deracinated. Because Judaism is about identity + religion, Jews still feel as Jews even as they become secularized. Even if they no longer literally believe in the Torah, they feel Jewish in the ethnic sense. In contrast, because Christianity is a matter of the heart, once the Faith begins to fade, it comes to mean very little to the ex-faithful. One can be an atheist and still feel powerfully Jewish because Judaism has a powerful historical-and-ethnic component. But once a Christian begins to feel doubt about God and Jesus, his loss of faith is near total, and there is nothing of meaning left. As Christianity once mattered so much to white folks in Europe and the US, the fading of Faith struck them much harder than such did to Jews. Even without faith in God, Jews got ethno-identity and history from Judaism. But without Faith, whites got nothing from Christianity.
That being the case, in an increasingly irreligious modern world, could whites recover their identities on ethnic, cultural, and historical grounds? This was doable in Europe with distinct ethno-states, but this ran into problems due to imperialism, communism, National Socialism, and war. Imperialism of various kind suppressed many form of ethno-nationalism. National Socialism and WWII gave white forms of nationalism a bad name. Communism suppressed national identity in the Soviet Union. But it was even more problematic in the US. Anglo-Americans, German-Americans, and Ethnic-White Americans, in order to get along together, all settled upon a very generic sense of Americanism. In order to accommodate non-Anglo-whites, Anglo-America had to water down an already rather bland Anglo-American culture even further. As a result, Anglo-American identity became near-anemic. Also, the American Myth of having broken free of the Mother Country to forge a new civilization created a blank-slate mentality among too many Anglo-American elites. As for Irish-Americans and even more problematic arrivals from Eastern and esp Southern Europe, their assimilation into Anglo-American necessitated the loss, repression, or neglect of entire aspects of their original cultures that grew weaker down the generations. Ian Buruma said that the problem of Singapore is that no single language — Chinese, English, Hindi, Malay, etc — is spoken well because everyone tries to accommodate other groups and get along. Likewise, because so many kinds of whites had to get along together in the US, White-American-ness is both everything and nothing. It was flexible and practical enough to accommodate so many white ethnic groups, and as such, was a very successful formula. But the end result was that all these White Americans came to lack a sense of distinct roots, history, and identity. Anglo-Americans with deeper roots had to pretend that late-arrivals from Eastern and Southern Europe were also part of American Civilization. And Italian-Americans, Greek-Americans, and Polish-Americans had to pretend George Washington was the ‘father of my country’ when their ancestors arrived a full century later after the American Republic was founded and played no role in the creation of the essentials of American Civilization. So much depended on make-believe and consensus-thinking than on blood-and-soil and true ancestry. Same problems now exist in France where Arabs & Africans are expected to embrace French history as THEIR OWN history while the white French(the real French) are made to believe that Arabs & Africans are(and always have been) part of Core French Civilization. Such things don’t work out well. Look what happened to the Roman Empire.

Of course, there are other reasons why white identity, along with racial and national identities all over the world, grew weak in the hyper-modernizing world of the 20th and 21st centuries. Rapid urbanization that led to atomization and individualism, followed by suburbanization that led to genericism, boredom, and mall culture. While suburbs had the look of small-town-living, they were extensions of urban life, not rooted communities that developed from the soil. Also, consumerism and non-stop barrage of electronica that turned culture mainly into one of fashion and celebrity than community, values, and remembrance. And the sheer vastness of America and mobility of Americans made it difficult for many to maintain their sense of identity and togetherness. In the US, Italian-Americans could be in New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, Miami, and etc. Chinese-Americans could be East Coast or West Coast. Or they could be in Texas. Anglos in the West have often been at odds with Anglos in the East. According to Woody Allens’ ANNIE HALL, NY Jews and LA Jews don’t see eye to eye.
That said, the fact that Jews were able to not only maintain but, in many respects, strengthen their Jewishness despite urbanization, globalization, and modernization goes to show that a people can control their consciousness despite all material transformations. Karl Marx said material conditions determine consciousness, but Jews have certainly been an outlier in this insofar as they managed to preserve and empower their identity despite the widely held belief that globalist trends are bound to weaken all ethnic & national ties in favor of global hubbub where all people are, more than anything, atomized individuals in pursuit of pleasure, happiness, and opportunity. Then, how is it that Jews, the most globalized and modernistic people on Earth, are also the most rooted in cultural heritage, historical memory, and ethnic loyalty? It goes to show what the power of will and consciousness is capable of. Of course, plenty of Jews have fallen by the wayside. And there is no guarantee that Jewish Identity or Power will last forever. But the fact that Jews have both immersed themselves in modernity and identity demonstrates that it is POSSIBLE for other peoples IF they were to summon the will, imagination, and vision to do likewise(and with more decency and principles).

Now, we know why Jews insist on racination for Jews and deracination for whites. As Jews are a minority, their power depends on blind loyalty and obedience of whites. Jews know that whites are far less likely to obey and serve Jews IF whites have a proud and powerful identity of their own. Just like the ego of the slave must be broken in order for him to serve the master(the sole owner of ego), the identity of whites must be erased in order for them to serve the master-identity of the Jews.
But as the current morality is against slavery and master-race ideology, Jews have cleverly shaped the Narrative to suggest that it’s all about whites suppressing their own ‘supremacist’ and ‘extremist’ tendencies to lend a hand and offer protection to poor, hapless, and beleaguered Jews who are beset on all sides by irrational ‘Anti-Semites’ and ‘Nazis’. So, we are to believe that White Supremacy is still the Way of the World, and therefore, Good Whites must make an extra effort to keep the Nazis and KKK down to protect Jews and prevent another Holocaust. In truth, we know that Nazis and KKK have zero power. We know that sporadic acts of violence toward Jews in the US and EU are reactions to Jewish Supremacism and Zionist Imperialism. While these acts of violence are often unpleasant and even contemptible, Jews have the power and hold most of the cards. And Jews have abused the power in so many ways. They angered Muslims with the Nakba and Wars for Israel. Jews have angered Eastern Europeans by pushing the Great Replacement. And many Americans are angry due to policies pushed by Jews, but many of them still do not know the full truth because the media they rely on for news & info are controlled by Jews who scapegoat everyone but themselves for all the social, economic, and political problems. Because many white people don’t know what is really going on, some of them turn to dumb or crazy ideas that reek of Neo-Nazism or KKK-ism out of desperation. Why? Because they are confused with lack of information. If they were truly woke to the truth, they’d realize that the US and EU are now colonies of the Empire of Judea, much like India was once the colony of the British and like Vietnam & Algeria were once the colonies of France.

If whites really knew what was up, they’d opt for White National Liberation movements against the Jewish Empire. If they are asked what they seek liberation from, they’d say from the Empire of Judea or EOJ(aka ZOG). But because many whites are confused and ill-informed and don’t know what to think or say, some of them stupidly fall into crazy Neo-Nazi strains of thought-and-expression, which are advantageous to Jews who can point to it and say, "Looky here! Didn’t we tell you? It’s the Nazis all over again." Thus, these fools hand moral advantage to Jewish Supremacists once again.
In contrast, if they characterized their movement as White National Liberation, people would ask, ‘liberation from what?’ The very notion of LIBERATION would imply that whites are under a supremacist power from which it seeks autonomy, emancipation, and independence. And this power is the Empire of Judea. White National Liberationists want liberation from Wars for Israel, from immoral support of Zionist-Imperialism, and from Jewish Hatred toward Russia, Jewish Hatred toward Iran, Jewish Hatred toward Syria, & Jewish Hatred toward Arabs. White National Liberationists want freedom from Homomania as the new-satanic-christianity, or Queertianity, all of it invented and employed by Jews. White National Liberationists want freedom from sexual colonization by blacks, aka ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs being pushed by blacks.
There are many ways a people can be colonized. Their land can be taken and colonized by others. Their women can be taken and their wombs can be colonized by others. Their children can be taken(as Greek boys who were recruited and indoctrinated to become Janissary to the Turks, a form of mental and soul-colonization). White National Liberationists want freedom from white sports being colonized by blacks, white history being retro-colonized by blacks & Diversity who were NOT a crucial part of European history. And above all, White National Liberationists want freedom from the demands of the Jewish Master Race. White National Liberationists dare to be uppity against the Jews unlike all those cuck-collaborator House Honkey or House Goy whites who ho-de-do before their Jewish Massuhs.

But there is still a problem. What does it mean to be white? Even without(and before) PC and anti-white propaganda, the notion of whiteness in America was useful and practical enough to maintain unity & order but not strong enough to constitute a united identity of depth and meaning. It is precisely that lack of substance in cultural and historical meaning that makes ‘white power’ sound more rude & abrasive than, say, the power of rooted identity. For instance, Irish Power or Greek Power has some resonance with history and culture. It’s not just about power for power’s sake but power to defend a tradition and community. But because whiteness is so vague, both too narrow and too broad, it comes across as a nihilism of power. It’s like refined sugar, which packs lots of calories but has zero nutrients. In contrast, Jewish Power isn’t just about power-for-power’s-sake but power to defend a history and culture. It has nutrients and fiber along with the calories. As for Black Culture, it has gained an element of nobility as an identity of resistance against racial oppression. So, even though blackness is as vague as whiteness — what do blacks in the US know or care about real black cultures of Africa? — , it seems more justified as empowerment in search for justice and equality. In contrast, because whiteness has been synonymous with power and domination in the US, the notion of ‘white power’ seems redundant, like ‘power power’. What’s the point of calling for more power for what is already powerful? In the past, such an argument would have been valid. But in the much-transformed and fast-changing America, it is no longer so. History doesn’t remain the same. At one time, China was the richest and most powerful civilization on Earth. Then, it was the Sick Man of Asia beset by imperialist powers. Then, it was a poor communist nation, united but backward. Now, it is on the rise, and it would be foolish to pretend today’s China is like China of 100 yrs ago. Just as Chinese changed so much in 100 yrs — along with Jews and their status in the world — , whites today are not what they were 100 yrs ago, and this goes for both those in US and EU. Jews know very well that history is always in a state of flux(more than ever in the turbulent age of globalism), but they want to fix the Narrative and Iconography permanently with Jews as Eternal Victims and Whites as Eternal Victors NO MATTER WHAT HAPPENS. This way, Jews get to guilt-bait whites and manipulate them into serving the poor, noble, and hapless Jews FOREVER. And many whites prefer to go along with this Narrative because even though they must act as servants, they get to play the master. Cuck whites serve Powerful Jews, but the Drama they put on is of noble white knights defending poor noble Jews from the Dragon of Hate. It’s so much like Hollywood. Jews own the place and hold all the cards, but the movies are of Great White Knights fighting forces of White Hate and Bad Muslims to ‘save the world’.

In order for whiteness to be something other than political sugar, it has to gain in nutrients. While Jews seek to deconstruct whiteness, White National Liberationists must seek to construct whiteness into a meaning. This doesn’t mean this constructed whiteness must replace European identities such as Polishness, Hungarianness, Irishness, Russianness, and etc. Rather, it would be another plane of identity. Identity can be multi-layered or -leveled. Before there were many European peoples, there was the white race. White Race biologically and 'mytho-spiritually' pre-existed all European cultures, ethnicities, and nationalities. It is the root, truly of blood and soil. And in the US, even as so many European identities have faded and been forgotten, there remains whiteness as a biological and genetic presence. What can be done with this identity that cannot be done away by ideology or propaganda? Jews seek to deconstruct and invalidate it. But WNL or White National Liberators can construct whiteness into a meaning of depth and substance. One of blood and soil, of one history and continuity, one of evolution and environment. A Book can be written on the subject, and it can be shared and read. And then, whiteness will have justification for power and revival. It may even gain a covenant.