The Great Lesson of the Russo-Jewish War, Aka the Ukraine Conflict: Don't be Nice Unless You Hold the Megaphone - As It Happens, Neoconazis Got the Big Speakers

 

Ukraine Is Committing Suicide by Cop – By the Saker

…I kept thinking about utter insanity of the Ukrainian actions. An outside observer could be forgiven for thinking that the Ukrainian people have some kind of death wish, and if maybe not most people, then at least the leaders of the Ukraine. And then it hit me. The Ukraine is doing what is known in the USA as “suicide by cop” …

A bulb went inside the head of Andrea Raevsky, aka the Saker, making him suddenly realize that the Ukraine Conflict is akin to ‘suicide by cop’, i.e. Ukrainian actions are so irrational and deranged that Russia has no choice but to apply full pressure. Raevsky has a point based purely on the externalities but fails with the internalities. After all, the meaning of ‘suicide by cop’ makes sense only in relation to the intentions of the suicidee-by-other-means. He wants to die but, for whatever reason, can’t make himself take his own life. Furthermore, in most such cases, the suicidee-by-cop has no intention of harming the police officers. Most often, he barges out of the house guns blaring but not aiming to kill. Or, he may shoot off blanks or make threatening gestures until the cops decide to put him down.

Kiev’s actions resemble those of a suicidee-by-cop only in that both were meant to provoke the stronger party to deadly action. But the intentions of Zelensky(and the Jewish Globalist Masters behind him), as well as those of the Ukro-Sub-Nazis, are entirely different from those of a genuine suicidee-by-cop. Unlike the latter who fires roughly toward cops only to provoke a deadly response, the Kiev regime has been targeting the Donbass region in particular(and Russia in general) for maximum harm. Whereas a suicidee-by-cop only feigns at being a homicidal maniac to draw gunfire from the cops, Zelensky and the Sub-Nazi scum around him are truly homicidal psychos driven by pathological impulses.

Zelensky’s worldview is in concert with that of his supremacist-minded tribal brethren, and the Sub-Nazi Slavs are merely the flipside of Cuck-Maggot-Slavs. If the Sub-Nazis bask in the nostalgia of the Aryan Nazi West waging war on the ‘Asiatic’ Slavic East, the Cuck-Maggot-Slavs wet their pants in the dream of being accepted, if only as servants and dogs, by the more affluent and supposedly more advanced, more sophisticated, more fashionable, and more ‘cool’ West.

Whether it’s reveling in Nazi Nostalgia fantasies or celebrating Globo-Homo & Negrolatry, it’s a case of self-loathing Slavs looking to the West for inspiration and approval. The Sub-Nazis hark back to the brief period when National Socialist Germany defined the fate of Continental Europe as the future of the West, whereas the Cuck-Maggots are slavish to the Current West dominated by Jewish Masters and Anglo Dogs.

Even though Sub-Nazi Ukrainians(who look to Hitler and Bandera) and Cuck-Maggot Ukrainians(the Cuck-Sacks) are diametrically opposed in many respects, they are united in their servility to their respective ideal vision of the West, be it ‘Aryan supremacist’ or ‘Jewish-Homo-Negro-centrist’. Especially as Russia partly defines itself as both Anti-Nazi(especially in relation to the Great Patriotic War) and Anti-Globo(especially in defiance of Jewish Supremacists who demand that the Russian Bear bend over and take it up the arse like Uncle Sam and others have done), it has resulted in the perverse alliance of the Far-Right and the Ultra-Cuck in Ukraine.
Something similar has been brewing in Poland. Prior to the Ukraine Conflict, the Polish Globalists and Polish Nationalists have often been at loggerheads. But if the two sides are united in one thing, it is self-loathing Slav-ism and contempt/hatred for Russia. The Globalists want Poland to go the way of Paris and London, even Los Angeles. As these people tend to be well-educated and urbane, they aren’t exactly Dumb Polacks.

Actually, they’re worse; they are Stupid Polacks, hardly surprising since stupidity now defines much of Western elite culture and ideology. As for the Polish Nationalists, they stand on questionable foundations. Even though Poles are a Slavic People, Polish Nationalism is predicated on how different the Poles are from other Slavs, especially the ‘backward’ kinds in the East. Of course, the West will always look upon Poles as a bunch of Slavic bumpkins fit only to be plumbers and sausage-makers, but Poles are so eager for approval, if only as inferior or second-rate ‘Central’ Europeans. Then, it’s no wonder that Polish Globo-Homo idiots and Polish ‘patriot’ tards are currently united and working with Jews and Homos to prolong the war in Ukraine to hurt Russia.

Still, Poles aren’t as deranged as the Ukrainians. After all, due to their proximity to the West and Catholicism & Latin alphabet, Poles among the Slavs, along with Czechs and Croats, have forged something like a unique national identity. Likewise, even though Swedes and Danish are Germanic peoples, they are clearly distinct from Germans. But this has hardly been the case for Ukraine, of which there never was a single well-defined historical concept or cultural entity. Indeed, much of Ukraine is simply inconceivable without Russian civilization, which originated from parts of Ukraine.

Paradoxically, precisely because Ukrainian nationality is so inchoate and ambiguous on its own, i.e. artificially made distinct from Russia, extreme policies have been implemented by Ukrainian elites to exaggerate Ukro-Russian enmity and to dehumanize Russians in general. While the differences between Russian language/culture and Ukrainian language/culture have been greatly amplified, the similarities & shared histories have been suppressed, even criminalized.
Then, it’s no wonder both ‘neo-nazism’ and globo-homo have been so appealing to entire swaths of Ukrainian self-loathing Slavs. Via globo-homo, Ukrainians can conveniently set themselves against Russia that said NO to celebration of homo bung-donging and child-genital-mutilation. And via ‘Neo-Nazi’ antics, Ukrainians can pry their history apart from the Great Patriotic War Narrative that once united many Russians and Ukrainians in shared memory even after the end of the Cold War and the creation of Ukraine as an independent republic. Needless to say, Jews are privately appalled by Ukro-Sub-Nazi types but are willing to work with ANY group against what is deemed their biggest global enemy, Russia. Anything that can be used to stoke anti-Russian hatred is worth its gold to Zion. Furthermore, it’s a convenient way for Jews to persuade that the Great Famine was the doing of Big Bad Russia than by the Soviets, most of its top leadership during the political terror and massive starvation was composed of non-Russians, many of them Jews.

A faker, if at least to fool oneself, has to be more extreme than an authentic person. The fact remains that, for all its worthless loathsomeness, Polish nationality is clearly distinct from that of Russia, just like Vietnam is from China. But the concept of a wholly unique Ukrainian nationality is as much hokum as Taiwanese nationality contra China, all the more hilarious in Taiwan’s case because, for the longest time, the Taipei government claimed to be the sole legitimate representative of all China.

Now, this isn’t to state that Ukrainian nationhood need be dissolved into greater Russia but merely to acknowledge that no sense of Ukraine-ness would be complete without taking into account its profound connections with Russia. Indeed, it’s hard to discern where exactly Russia ends and where Ukraine begins. Only in parts of Western Ukraine can one speak of a culture distinct enough to merit a separate nationality from Russia.

Still, just because peoples have deep connections doesn’t mean they have to belong to one nation. Brits and Irish both speak English and have a deep shared history as well(though often contentious), but they belong to different nations(though it will be difficult to tell them apart in the future as both are being neo-colonized under the Jewish globalist regimen that demands open borders, globo-homo, and Negrolatry). The US and Canada developed as profoundly Anglo-European countries but remained separate countries, also true of Australia and New Zealand. And Mexico and Central American countries remain independent despite having the shared background of brown native cultures(that of ‘Tacoans’) and colonization at the hands of Spanish Conquistadors.

In the same spirit, it had been workable for Russia and Ukraine to remain separate countries while acknowledging their deep historical ties. Viktor Yanukovych sought a path that was conciliatory to Russia while remaining friendly with the EU. He accepted Russia’s more favorable deal over the EU’s proposal, but it didn’t preclude Ukraine from dealing with the West either.
But whereas Russia could accept Ukraine dealing with both the East and the West, the US and EU, under Jewish control, deemed it unacceptable and thereby engineered a coup, which finally succeeded with the recruitment of sub-nazi elements(and possibly Mossad assassins).

The Maidan crisis gives us a glimpse into the Jewish Way. Unlike most peoples who are okay with multi-polarities, Jewish Power insists on ‘my way or the highway’. It’s certainly been no different in the US, where all the ‘Arabists’ were purged from the US government and institutions. Jewish Power could only accept ultra-Zionists and pro-Israelites. And whites can’t even express a mild sentiment like “It’s Okay to be White”. Never mind overt ‘white supremacism’; a mere hint of positive white consciousness triggers the Jews who demand that whites totally negate and purge their own identity while offering complete loyalty to Jews and Israel.
Then, why would Jewish supremacist mentality be any different abroad? Just like whites in the West cannot be both pro-Jewish and pro-white — they must be totally anti-white and totally pro-Jewish — , it was intolerable that Ukraine under Yanukovich would negotiate with both the EU and Russia for its own national interests.
Rather, it was decreed by Jewish Supremacists that Ukraine must deal ONLY with the Jewish-controlled West(or Schwest) and cut all ties with Russia, even murdering Ukro-Russians who looked eastward or expressed the obvious: Russia and Ukraine have been joined at the hip forever. Also intolerable was any skepticism of Schwestern intentions.

A massive de-Russification campaign began, one of the most harrowing ethnic conflicts in European history after World War II. The West, which once sermonized against excessive ethnic enmity in former Yugoslavia, did everything to stoke ethnic hatred in Ukraine, even to the extent of recruiting, encouraging, and arming sub-nazi and far-right elements. Anything that was anti-Russian was funded and elevated in the institutions. Though Jews denounce people like Greg Johnson in the US, they recruited such Naziesque types who wished the Germans had prevailed in the East in WWII and reduced Russia into a German colony of Slavo-helots.

For Jewish Power, its word is final, indeed the word of god, and that’s that. Look how Jewish supremacists are at the forefront of purging Free Speech in the West. Now that they got the power and no longer need constitutional and legal guarantees of free speech for themselves(as they control most of the institutions and industries that matter in Narrative-creations and public discourse), what now goes by ‘free speech’ boils down to “Jews say, goyim obey.”

Indeed, the main reason why Russia and other relatively sovereign nations are pushing back against Globo-Homo has nothing to do with ‘gay rights’ per se, or the freedom of individual homos to be tooty and do their own thing. No, globo-homo isn’t about ‘gay rights’ but about homosexuality, trans-nuttery, and related deviances as the mandatory and official ‘spiritual’ themes of the Empire of Judea. In other words, politicians and prominent people in the West are compelled to march in the ‘gay pride’ parades and consent to public buildings & big companies displaying signs and symbols that would have us believe that homo-fecal-penetration and tranny-penis-cutting are uniquely wonderful things, indeed so much so that an entire month must be devoted to affirming the West’s celebration of them.

Western goy elites, having become so accustomed to the rule of “Jews Decree, Goyim Agree”, hardly protested the demands made of the Ukrainian government following the ouster of Yanukovich in the Maidan ‘revolution’. Perhaps, privately some of these goy cuck-elites wanted a more moderate policy, but Jews had the whip-hand, and that meant working with the most cynical and most radical elements in Ukraine to use the country as a battering ram against Russia, to intimidate and demoralize it, as if to say, “We are right on your doorstep, we are stamping out Ukro-Russians, we are murdering people in the Donbass, and YOU RUSSIANS can’t do anything about it.”

In retrospect, it was foolish for Russians to think they could come to any terms with Zion. Russians should have realized, upon surveying conditions in the West, that Jewish Power, once sufficiently entrenched, won’t accept anything but total mastery. Indeed, consider the fate of the Anglos in the US, the UK, Canada, and Australia. Anglo ‘peace’ with Jews isn’t an accommodation but a total surrender to all their demands. Why would things be any different with Jewish demands on Russia? And of course, once Russia was beaten, Jews would then have moved against the Ukro-Sub-Nazis, purging them once their usefulness was past due. Henry Kissinger once said, “To be an enemy of America can be dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal”, but me thinks he was really talking about Jewish Power. After all, it’s dangerous for Russia and Iran to be the enemies of Jewish Power, but it’s been totally fatal for Anglos to be the friends of Jewish Power. Jewish Supremacists, as ‘friends’, gained complete access in the Anglo World to control everything and run Anglos into the dirt, where they now snort like pigs on a farm.

Anyway, if there is any lesson to take from the Russo-Jewish War, aka the Ukrainian Conflict, it’s that there’s no use being nice if you don’t control the megaphone. Suppose Bill is a big tough guy and can do real damage to little Bob. Bill wants Bob to listen and show some respect. He doesn’t want to hurt Bob too badly. He decides to play nice, relatively speaking. Knock Bob a few times but not deliver the knockout blow and punch out his teeth. Now, if Bill commanded the megaphone and made it well known to Bob and observers that he’s going easy because he doesn’t want to hurt or kill Bob, his relatively humane approach would be noted, even respected. He would be acting from the position of strength, not only in raw muscle power and bigger size but getting the message across for all to hear, especially Bob.

But, what if Bill doesn’t control the megaphone. Then, his ‘humane’ approach(given he could do serious damage if he really wanted to) is likely to be counterproductive to his aims. Bill is being nice, but suppose the owner of the megaphone spins the ‘narrative’ so that Bill is failing to deliver the fatal blow because he’s a wuss, he’s a pussy, he’s scared, he’s lazy, he’s incompetent, he’s confused, he’s all talk and no walk. Bob, emboldened by this spin, is likely to taunt Bill and hurl objects at him. Bob drops his pants and moons Bill and say, “kiss my ass, you fa**ot!” Then, he turns around and pulls out his dong and say, “Suck on this, maggot!” Meanwhile, the observers, taking their cues from the megaphone, will cheer on Bob as the defiant and feisty underdog standing up to Big Dumb Bully Bill who gets no respect, not from Bob, not from the crowd. Thus, Bill’s ‘nice’ approach would have been for naught. He only would have wasted time, and the Bill-Bob conflict would have been prolonged, with both getting hurt far more than had Bill gone all in to knock out Bob real quick.

It’s possible that something along those happened in the Ukraine Conflict. Russia’s relatively humane approach, sparing most civilian infrastructures and being rather conciliatory in tone, went totally unappreciated by most people in Ukraine and the West(though not so much in the non-West with their independent media that, over the years, have grown cynical of the US and EU). Every time Russia was trying to be ‘nice’ and come to the negotiating table, it wasn’t appreciated as an offer from a position of strength but desperation from a position of weakness, even cowardice by a paper bear that needs to rip out computer chips from washing machines to launch missiles. Russia hadn’t gone all in against Ukraine, but the Jewish-controlled megaphone assured Ukrainians and Western observers that Russian power is spent and all out of missiles, bombs, tanks, artillery, and men, most of whom are running with tails behind their legs to hide under the bed and cry to mama. In other words, Russians are just like Italian mama’s boys.

Furthermore, even though Russia’s rather light approach limited civilian casualties, it was ignored and made hardly any difference in Western opinion. Again, Russian efforts not only went unappreciated but were defamed by the Jewish-controlled megaphone that spun the conflict as the GREATEST HUMAN CATASTROPHE since the Holocaust. The megaphone told the West that evil Russians were wantonly targeting hospitals, blowing up schools & concert halls, and indiscriminately murdering civilians on a massive scale. Much of this ‘reporting’ was just projection of Ukrainian war crimes since 2014. Even though the Jewish-controlled Kiev regime used sub-nazi morons to bomb civilians in the Donbass region, the megaphone made it seem as if Russians are the ones routinely terrorizing Ukrainian innocents. And whenever Ukrainian atrocities were discovered, they were blamed on Russians with full complicity of the Western Media that take their cues from Jewish Supremacists.

If the Russian side had been heard throughout Ukraine, perhaps more Ukrainians would have considered Russia’s reasons and its offers. But, most Ukrainians got the news only from Kievian and Western sources, and all they heard was ‘Russians are monsters’, ‘Russians are scum’, ‘Russians are the worst of the worst’, and etc. But then, since the end of the Cold War(and especially following the Maidan Coup), generations of Ukrainians were indoctrinated with a nationalism that defined itself AGAINST Russia. Many young Ukrainians came to feel that London and Los Angeles are culturally closer to Ukraine than Russia is. That’s how retarded a lot of Ukrainians are. So, even as Russians went in regarding Ukrainians as Slavic brothers and sisters, Ukrainians saw themselves as part of the ‘West’ and regarded Russians as ‘orcs’.

So, what’s the point of being nice if you’re going to be blamed as the worst monster that ever lived anyway? If the megaphone is going to vilify you NO MATTER WHAT, you might as well go King Kong or Godzilla and really deal a heavy blow to show who’s boss. Niceness has value only when respected, appreciated, and reciprocated. But when it’s seen as weakness or stupidity, it will be wasted. That’s where Neville Chamberlain failed with Adolf Hitler, where Nikita Khushchev failed with Mao Zedong, and where Vladimir Putin failed with the Jews.

Niceness is nice ONLY IF met with gratitude. Otherwise, it’s just vulnerability and weakness, something that will only be abused. Indeed, the whole of Russian approach since the end of the Cold War has been fatally flawed for being overly nice to those who are hostile and hellbent on gaining supremacy over Russia, from Jewish eyes nothing but the land of dumb, lazy, and drunken Slavs. While Russians were referring to the US and EU as ‘our friends’ and ‘our partners’, the Jewish-run West ran countless articles about gangster Putin, new hitler Putin, thug Putin, and about all those stupid dumb retarded Russians.

Perhaps, one could argue that Russia’s friendly diplomacy was necessary, at least until now. Far weaker than it is today, Russia had to swallow its pride, choose caution above all, and play for time while developing its industrial and military capabilities, as well as ties with key non-Western nations, especially in Asia and the Middle East. But one thing for sure, in the current Ukraine Conflict, every ‘nice’ action by Russia went ignored, impugned, ridiculed, spun, and/or defamed. From this perspective, Russia would have done better to have Pavel Craig Robertsky at the helm instead of Putin. Fully aware of the mendacity and contempt that runs through the Western Media, Pavel the Terrible, Horrible, and Awesome(and his top commander General Asskickovich) would have brushed aside any proposal of going in ‘nice’. His motto would have been “No More Mr. Nice Guy”.

At this stage in the conflict, Russia has only one option left. Totally smash and dismantle Ukraine, take all of the eastern half. Those who want to stay are to be welcomed as brothers and sisters. Those who hate Russia must be forced into the western part of Ukraine. And there can be no mercy for those Ukrainians whose nationality is defined by self-loathing Slavism, fantasy ‘Aryanism’, imitating Dumb Polack-ism, and celebrating globo-homo-ism. There’s nothing to mourn or regret in killing as many of those scum as possible.

RUSSIAN FM LAVROV REVEALS THE INSIDIOUS PLAN OF NATO AND THE SUDDEN ROLE OF THE OSCE IN UKRAINE

 Video Link

Even if GOP can draw more 'Latinos' from the Democratic Party to win elections, Problem is All Politicians must swim in the Fish Tank controlled by Zion and Its Puppets

https://vdare.com/articles/is-the-black-brown-coalition-unraveling

But if the GOP wants to survive, it better figure out Realpolitik real fast. A key point: Making the Democrats the black party requires understanding how much Hispanics disdain and in some cases dislike blacks, and why remaining in the party does not serve Hispanic interests.
The Democrat coalition is a hodgepodge of loud, non-white, sometimes sexually-deviant sub-groups with conflicting interests. Try getting Aztlan irredentists, black nationalists, homosexual activists, Islamic grievance hustlers, and leftist Jews in one room.

Democratic Party is the Jewish Party. It's about ultra-right Jews larping as ‘leftists’. It is also the white-elite-party that makes it so formidable. Majority of Democratic voters are still whites, the bulk of the most educated and well-connected.

In truth, only Jews, blacks, and homos matter in the American Political Drama. Crumbs are thrown at Muslims, but they got zero power, and most Americans don’t like them(even true of blues state folks). Browns are numerous but hopeless. Look at Latin America. After several centuries, white minorities still rule over mostly passive brown folks. Most browns are Tacoans, not Aztlanists. In other words, they live for taco and cerveza, not the strong brew of contentious politics. Even the crime problem in Mexico is the product of most browns being tacoan beaners. They are nice people and don’t stand up to drug cartels and the like. They keep their heads low.
Americans love winners, and that’s why only Jews(winners of brain power), blacks(winners of sports & pop music), and homos(winners of fashion & style) matter. Yellows do well in school but are ‘lame’ and don’t count in identity-idolatry. Hindus seem to count more but they are mainly useful as collaborators. Under British Rule, Hindus became adept at working with the West. Sure, Indians eventually gained independence but PEACEFULLY and by adopting Western ‘values’. It also became the “world’s biggest democracy”, which goes to show how culturally servile to Anglosphere it became.

We must never underestimate the one huge advantage for the Democrats. Most white elites are Democrats, and they either control or manage all the elite institutions. This matters big time because it’s the Deep State that constitutes the permanent government. In the stupid movie THE GOOD SHEPHERD, Matt Damon’s CIA character says his WASP folks own the US and the rest of Americans are mere guests. Deep State thinking is the same. Its members are the permanent rulers, and the politicians are mere guests. Politicians come and go, but the deep state remains.

So, while politicians rely on the votes of the hoi polloi every 2, 4, or 6 yrs, once ensconced in office their chief roles are focused on appeasing big donors and the deep state. This is why the GOP is utterly useless even when they got majority hold of Congress and the presidency. In their day to day operations, all politicians must deal with the institutions of power and industries with big money. They reach out to their constituents only during election seasons, if that(as most don’t even do that), and spend of their time at the feet of Big Money and Big Government. They know the best assurance for re-election is appeasing big donors and assenting to the Deep State.

The real problem with the GOP is not elections but its total absence in the Deep State. Washington DC institutions are 95% Democratic. So, even if GOP were to win ALL the seats in Congress and have the presidency, they must deal with entrenched institutions that are wholly Democrat-controlled.
Government is a fish tank. So, Republicans lose even when they win. Imagine if politics were about land animals versus aquatic animals, BUT the government is situated in the water. Thus, wateriness always prevails. So, even when land animals win the majority of seats, they struggle to remain barely afloat in the domain of dolphins, turtles, sharks, and fishes. How can you drain the tank(or the swamp) when all the levers of power are held by the water creatures?

Now, does that mean the institutions are progressive and into social justice because they're all Democratic? No, that’s just a ruse. The Deep State is about power for power’s sake, and it’s currently controlled by Jews who got the most money, select the puppets & whores, and control the gods(the sacred symbols & narratives of society).

Pedro Alvarado focuses on the rift between brown voters and black voters, but that’s about the powerless rabble on the bottom. It ignores the white ‘liberals’ at the top in the institutions working with and for Jews. Even if more browns vote GOP and send more Republicans to Washington D.C., the latter will just end up doing the bidding of the Deep State that serves Jewish Supremacism. Look at the likes of Mitt Romney, Lindsey Graham, Youngkin, and so many others.

And let’s stop pretending Democrats are Jewish Leftists. Just ask the Palestinians how the Jews really care about 'social justice'. The likes of Chuck Schumer are closer to Netanyahu and do everything to suppress BDS. Most of Jewish 'Leftism' is just a masquerade. It’s Jewish ultra-rightist supremacism laundered as ‘progressive’. That said, there are genuine Jewish Leftists like Max Blumenthal. Like them or not, there is a certain consistency in their principled stance. But with most Jewish Democrats? Forget about it.

What to do about blacks? Bolsheviks had the Cheka, later replaced by OGPU that morphed into the KGB. A movie was made about Chekists.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X48uZMsbufI

The main driver of ‘wokeness’ isn’t ideology but idolatry and of what? Jews control ‘wokeness’ and mainly use the idolatries of globo-homo and BLM. During the Obama yrs, globo-homo was most prominent. Jews didn’t worry about black loyalty then because having Obama assured virtually all black votes for the Democrats.

But after Obama, blacks were less enthralled of the Party because, looking back on the 8 yrs under Obama, Jews and homos got most of the goodies(and immigrants gained a lot) while blacks got little but symbolism. No wonder Donald Trump increased his share of black vote. Not by much but every vote counts in some blue states. Also, in the 2016 election, many blacks in Michigan didn’t vote at all.

So, in the final yrs of Trump’s presidency, Jews decided to go big on BLM or black idolatry.
Thus, politics since then has been stoking black ego and erecting monuments to blackity blackness, like George Floyd statues, ROTFL. It even led to de facto human sacrifice in riots(as offerings to angry black gods) and the bogus trial of Derek Chauvin who most certainly did not kill Floyd, the fentanyl junkie.

Anyway, if early Soviet Union was terrorized by the Cheka or Chekists, one could say the current order is tyrannized by Blacka(or Bleka) and its Blackists(or Blekists). This is what it should be called. Blackism or Blekism(to play a word game on Chekism). And it is of course a reign of terror because it goes against truth and common sense. The obvious lie can be enforced only with threat and violence.

Communism lasted as long as it did in Russia not only because of terror and repression but because enough people at the top really believed in the nonsense they were peddling. So, even when the system was faced with crisis after crisis, they doubled down on their radicalism…. until finally they stopped believing and the whole system became one big cynical game of position and status until that deteriorated too.

For now, we must let Blekism run its course. Let the Blekists idolatrize blackness as innately noble and sacred. Let them blame all black problems on non-blacks. Let them sweep black criminality under the rug and pretend it doesn’t exist or is justified. Let them do this until they can no longer deny the truth.

This news story is beautiful: https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2021/12/07/where-have-all-the-flowers-gone/

"They will next be robbing hotel guests room by room. I remember checking into an upscale hotel on Rio de Janeiro’s Copacabana Beach sometime in the 1980s. I asked the clerk why the hotel had 30 armed guards with submachine guns in the lobby. He replied that last week a gang took over the hotel and robbed guests room by room. The same event can’t be very far in our future. Democrats already permit blacks to burn and loot the business districts of Democrat-controlled cities. Just ask any resident of New York, Chicago, Minneapolis, Seattle, Portland, Atlanta what life is like in Democrat cities."

It’s Blekism running riot and spreading terror. It’s like use of poison gas in war. It's used against the the other side but the wind may blow it back in your direction. Blue city elites meant to use black terror against Middle America but it’s blowing back in their face. It’s total LOL.

So, I say let Blekism take over blue areas. Black-and-Blue, the new formula of ‘wokeness’. Let the blues believe blacks are saintly Emmett Tills being killed by rednecks when, in truth, black thuggery and criminality(sanctified as noble) are wreaking havoc all over. Blue city folks won’t listen to us, so they will have to learn the hard way… just like communism finally failed of its own excesses.

By the way, what is a ‘Latino’? White ones? Brown ones? There are even black ones. ‘Anglo’ only means white Anglo Americans. But ‘Latino’ can mean any race. So, a brown tacoan with zero white blood still counts as ‘Latino’ simply because he speaks Espanol. Ridiculous.

A thought. If whites are offended by the term ‘white supremacism’, maybe they should go with WHITE STUPDENOUSISM or WHITE STUPENDISM. White Stupendism believes white achievements have been stupendous, which is true enough historically in arts, culture, science, and philosophy. Saying that one’s race, people, and culture is stupendous is surely less controversial than saying it is supremacist.

VINCENT JAMES || DEREK CHAUVIN APPEALING HIS CONVICTION

On Memorial Day, Americans Must Not Only Mourn the Fallen but Remember that US Soldiers Died in Wars of Empire and Genocide — US Military Is Now the Death Squad of Zion

https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2020/05/25/97596/

Paul Craig Roberts:

In a Memorial Day editorial, the ignorant, white-hating editorial board of the New York Times wrote:

“Bases named for men who sought to destroy the Union in the name of racial injustice are an insult to the ideals servicemen and women are sworn to uphold – and an embarrassing artifact of the time when the military itself embraced anti-American values.”

The ignorance in this statement is extraordinary. The South left the union because the South was being economically exploited by the North. The South fought because the North invaded the South. The North invaded the South, as President Lincoln said repeatedly, to “preserve the union,” that is, the empire. Lincoln said repeatedly that the South could have slavery forever if only the South would stay in the union.

Notice the selective moral outrage at the New York Times.

For true moral outrage, we don't even need to dwell on the distant past. Since the end of the Cold War, the US military has been involved in Wars for Israel that destroyed entire nations on false pretexts. Judeo-Nazis, aka Neocons and other Zionist swamp creatures, were behind this. And the US military backs Israel, the actions of which against Palestinians would count as 'genocide' by UN definition.

And what of US imperialist wars? We've been told over and over that all those US soldiers died defending US freedom. By dropping bombs and killing millions overseas? Apparently, those US imperialist soldiers in Philippines were dying(and killing the Filipinos by the bushel) to defend freedom at home!! US has a strange idea of defending freedom. America cries out in pain as it strikes other nations. It surrounds Iran but accuses Iran of aggression. Its navy confronts China in Chinese water but China is accused of belligerence.

Because the US was never invaded, most fallen US soldiers either died killing one another(in the Civil War) or killing foreigners in imperialist wars. They had NOTHING to do with defending US territory or US freedom. Even the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor was not a prelude to some grand plan to invade, let alone defeat, the US. It was to forestall US naval power in the Pacific so that Japan could secure its dominance over Asia.

The vile cliche or trope about US soldiers having given their lives in defense of US freedom must be laid to rest. US soldiers did NOT die defending US freedoms. US role in Korea and Vietnam had nothing to do with defending freedom at home. Was American democracy threatened because China fell under communism? No. Then, why would it have mattered what happened to Korea and later Vietnam? Also, by dividing those nations in the first place, it was the US that planted the seeds for horrible civil wars there.

When the US attacked and invaded Iraq on bogus grounds, we heard the mantra yet again. Oh say can you see, those American boys and girls with bombs and missiles were defending US freedom! Or, we were told the US had to fight terrorists over there so it wouldn't have to fight them over here. Except that Iraq, like Libya and Syria, became infested with terrorists ONLY BECAUSE of US intervention. Looking further back, who'd done most to create the lunatics who did 9/11? It was US allies, especially Saudis and Pakistanis. And, US and Israel had been encouraging and using Jihadis, directly or indirectly, to undermine the region for dominance. And there should no longer be any doubt that Israel covertly egged on those Muslim radicals to attack NY and DC so that the US military could be used to fight more Wars for Israel. As most Americans have been dumbed down by Hollywood movies where ALL Muslims are 'terrorists', most Americans couldn't distinguish one bunch of Arabs from another bunch or one sect of Islam from another. Hussein had nothing to do with it, but he was a 'muzzie' too, and that was good enough for so many Americans to support the invasion. Clever Jews exploited goy ignorance and apathy on foreign affairs. Indeed, US and Israel continue to play this game to keep Syria in a state of war and destruction.

Because soldiers believe in patriotism & did as ordered and because so many young men died before they could start families and fulfill their dreams, every nation should honor their fallen, even if those soldiers fought in unjust wars. This goes for Japan and Germany as of the US.

But let's face facts. Majority of US soldiers died in imperialist wars, some of which were almost genocidal in nature. Why does NYT focus so much on the Evil Slavery Narrative when the US military carried out imperialist or semi-genocidal wars against the American Indians, the Mexicans(who lost the SW territories), Asians, Arabs, and etc.? The body count is in the millions, and no, those wars had NOTHING to do with 'defending freedom at home'.
So many idiot Americans thank US soldiers for defending American democracy, but just how did the US military do that by bombing and destroying impoverished or developing nations thousands of miles away? Did Americans lose their freedom when the US withdrew from Vietnam? Would US democracy been endangered if US didn't invade Iraq in 2003?
Actually, if the US has become less democratic and more oligarchic over the years, it's because goy America lost the civilian war of institutional power(and the culture war) to Jewish supremacists, Zionist-globalists, or Judeo-Nazis. The war that really must be fought is OVER HERE, and the best weapon is Truth and Courage. But clever Jews still have so many dimwit goyim believing that US freedom can only be preserved by US soldiers marching off to war to destroy and degrade whomever Jews hate. Jewish Hate is the driving force behind US foreign policy and belligerence.

Of course, NYT is run by Jewish supremacists who now fully endorse US imperialism, as most wars in recent yrs have been Wars for Israel. Who cares if all those Arabs and Muslims died? There's no moral outrage about any of that in the Paper of Wreckage. Precisely because Jewish supremacists at NYT need whites to remain as servile cucks, they keep cooking up this 'white guilt' BS about the special evil of the South.
But if the South is guilty of slavery, why isn't the North blasted for its 'genocide' of the American Indians? Isn't genocide worse than slavery? (Of course, as mass immigration and eradication of American Indians turned out great for Jews, never mind all that.) And it was the dominant North that led US into imperialist over-reach that piled up so many dead bodies around the world. And recently, Jews have lots of blood on their hands as they've led US into Wars for Israel. And sanctions are a form of war too, and they've destroyed countless lives, mostly Arab and/or Muslim, to quench Jewish supremacist blood-lust. So, in observations of future Memorial Days, let us shame the Jews who've turned and abused the US military as a semi-genocidal war-mongering machine for Zion. JKK or Jew-Klux-Klan is the real terrorist power of the US. Or, at the very least, Americans should thank US military men for being such stupid whores of Jewish Power. Such gratitude would at least be honest in spelling out what the American War Machine is all about.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/apology-day

On Memorial Day yesterday, Americans were called upon to remember the American soldiers who have been killed in America’s many foreign wars. U.S. interventionists should have also used the day to apologize not only to the families of those veterans but also to the families who lost loved ones as a consequence of U.S. interventionism in their countries.

The Irony of how Holocaust Remembrance Slipped in Jewish Supremacism under the Guise of Anti-Supremacism

https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2019/05/13/the-lies-about-world-war-ii/

Irving never directly addresses in either book the Holocaust. He does document the massacre of many Jews, but the picture that emerges from the factual evidence is that the holocaust of Jewish people was different from the official Zionist story.

One of the problems of Holocaust Remembrance(akin to Holocaust Worship, which leads to Worship of Jews) is that it 'esoterically' carries the seeds of Judeo-Nazism. In other words, it is supremacist, or yet another form of supremacism even as it denounces the 'master race' supremacism of Nazism. The rites and rituals of Holocaust Remembrance aren't really about the evil of mass murder, six million dead, or a people being targeted for mass extermination. It's really about the outrage that it was done to JEWS. The moral logic would suggest that Jews are the superior race, the true master race, the holy race. Therefore, the real crime of the Holocaust was that a false wanna-be master race(the Teutons) dared to mass murder the true master race, the Jews. In remembrance, what we hear is not the outrage of killing 6 million people(though some analyses point to numbers closer to 3 million) but 6 million JEWS. So, the real abomination of Nazi Criminality was that it targeted Holy Jews than mere humans. One gets the sense that the Holocaust wouldn't have been deemed so evil and unforgettable/unforgivable IF Nazi Germans and their collaborators had killed another people while sparing Jews. Abe Foxman was once recorded admonishing Ukrainian leaders NOT to conflate the 'Holodomor' with the Holocaust. The Shoah is a jealous god, and 'thou shall not worship no tragedy before(or alongside) it'. If Jews really regarded the Holocaust as a crime against Humanity, they would welcome comparisons of Jewish suffering in the Shoah with the sufferings of rest of humanity in similar tragedies. But Jews insist on maintaining the singularity of the Shoah because the victims weren't merely human but JEWS. Now, it's understandable why a people would be more upset with their own dead. After all, Armenians are more upset over what the Turks did. Chinese are more sensitive about the Nanking Massacre. The difference is that Jews don't merely grieve over their own dead among themselves but try to force all the world to feel that the Shoah was worse than any other tragedy because it was done to JEWS. Indeed, Jews want goyim to believe that suffering of Jews is worse than even the suffering of their own goy kind. Whites, it seems, have truly bought into this. They are so obsessed with protecting a single hair on a Jewish child in Israel but turn a blind eye to the grisly deaths of thousands of whites in South Africa(because whites expressing white identity will displease the holy Jews). As long as the super-rich Jewish diamond industrialists can rake in billions by bribing the black-run government, who cares if white gentiles get slaughtered on farms?

The 20th century has seen lots of bloodshed and mayhem. But most mass-killings have been forgotten, ignored, or suppressed. Even rationalized. Many will argue that the Holocaust was especially evil because it wasn't just mass-killing but a targeted genocide of a specific people. Fair enough. Still, one can't help but feel that the real outrage is over murder of JEWS than murder of mere people, the goyim. Suppose millions of Jews had died not by targeted genocide but by a broader movement, like forced collectivization in the USSR. Suppose a political campaign ended up killing millions of Jews by famine and starvation than by extermination squads. Would the deaths of those millions of Jews be mostly ignored like the deaths of millions of Ukrainians or Chinese(under communism)? I think not. The reason why Jews are far less harsh on communism is because most Jews greatly benefited in the USSR just when millions of Slavic Christians were being dispossessed and killed by starvation. It was good for Jews, and the victims were goyim. And do Jews feel even a smidgen of remorse or conscience about what they did in Russia in the 90s? Most Jews don't. If anything, they even make alliances with Neo-Nazi elements in Ukraine to undermine and eventually take over Russia, as if it belongs to them as well. Jews kvetch about one dead Jew in Israel but show NO feelings about countless dead Muslims resulting from Wars for Israel.

So, Holocaust Remembrance isn't anti-supremacist. It is a sly program of slipping in Jewish Supremacism under the guise of anti-supremacism. Jewish dead in the Holocaust are portrayed as the greatest victims of racial supremacism, but the sheer inordinate emphasis on the victims being Jewish implies that Jewish Lives are more precious than any other lives. If German Nazis had spared Jews but tried to wipe out Hungarians or only Gypsies, I doubt there would be as much fuss about it.
One thing for sure, Hitler's plan for Russia was grim and brutal. He planned mass exterminations in the millions to be followed by mass enslavement. A Slavic-holocaust or Slavocaust was planned for Russians, and given that Germans conquered much territory during the war, one could argue that all the Slavs under German Occupation were also holocaust survivors(using the logic of the Jewish definition of 'holocaust survivor', who could be ANYONE who lived in zones under Nazi Occupation even if he or she never stepped inside a Nazi Concentration Camp). And yet, there is no World Remembrance of Russian deaths and sacrifices. Germans aren't pressured to feel guilty over their crimes against Slavs. If anything, the German government is pressured by Jewish-controlled US to wage economic war to spread misery in Russia. Germany is also silenced from noticing and denouncing the alliance of Jews and Neo-Nazi elements in Ukraine.
Also, if the great lesson learned by Germans from WWII and the Holocaust is the evil of Ethno-Supremacism, why are most Germans and Europeans silent about the obviously ethno-supremacist policy of Jewish-controlled US that favors Jews over Palestinians, Jews over Arabs/Muslims(whose nations have been devastated at the behest of Zionist power), Jews over Christians -- notice the total silence about all those Christian Arabs destroyed as the result of Wars for Israel -- , and Jews over Russians? In the end, the lesson of Holocaust Remembrance is not "It is evil for any people to claim superiority and commit mass-murder against another people deemed inferior" but "It is evil to target Jews for political violence because Jews are innately holier, superior, and more precious than any other race." Holocaust Remembrance logic implicitly posits that the Shoah was worse than a case of mere human-cide. It was closer to Deicide, the killing of god-men. It's a logic borrowed from Christianity. Why did the killing of Jesus matter so much? After all, Jews and Romans killed plenty of people. Jews stoned many deemed as heretics or blasphemers. Romans killed many deemed to be traitorous or dangerous to the empire. Then, why make such a big fuss about the killing of Jesus, some Jewish carpenter in Judea? Because, at least according to Christian Mythology, He was no ordinary man. Indeed, He was even more than a Great Man. He was God-Man. Thus, it wasn't murder of a human but the murder of the Son of God.
Similar logic underlies Holocaust Remembrance. The real crime is not mass murder of humans but the mass murder of JEWS, the holy race, the awesome race, the genius race, the ancient race, the super race, and etc. Granted, Jews are indeed one of history's great peoples, and surely, the mass killing of Jews will be more consequential than the mass deaths of, say, Bolivians or Burmese. If all Bolivians or Burmese were to disappear(or had never existed in history), the world be pretty much as it is. But if Jews had never existed, the world would be profoundly different, for good or ill. And if Jews were to vanish into the thin air, the world would be much affected by their absence. So, it's understandable why Jews(and their fans, admirers, cucks, and worshipers) would be so obsessed about the well-being and power of Jews in the world. But then, this is precisely why Holocaust Remembrance isn't ultimately anti-supremacist but neo-supremacist. It is less a condemnation of racial supremacism per se than a condemnation of false supremacism that dared to do violence to the true supreme people, the genuine master race of Jews.
Indeed, US politics cannot be understood apart from the fact that Jewish Supremacism is the core defining 'principle' of all that happens. Notice how US politics isn't essentially about Left vs Right but "Jews like?" vs "Jews don't like?" White Identity is suppressed(even if it isn't supremacist) because Jews fear ANY white consciousness will undermine blind obedience among whites to Jewish Supremacism. Slaves mustn't have pride or ego. Only the master deserves to have them. People with pride and ego do not want to serve others. Only when such are taken from them do they become servile to those who are allowed a sense of self. Jews hate the sight of 'uppity' whites who prefer to think for themselves about their own identity and history than be berated by Jews that they are so tainted by 'white privilege' and burdened by 'white guilt' that they must forsake white identity and serve another people, one that happens to be holy, to gain redemption. Of course, that Other People are Jews(even though Jewish money and skills played a big role in White Imperialism, Slave Trade, and conquest of non-whites). Jews bitch about 'white supremacism', but they are suppressing white national liberation from Jewish Supremacism. All this Russia, Russia, Russia hysteria is presented as 'progressive' resistance against Trump as Putin-Puppet, but it's all about Jews. Jews hate Russia because its national autonomy stands in the way of total Jewish World Hegemony. And they esp hate Russia because it says NO to Homomania, a proxy of Jewish World Imperialism. Jews push mass non-white immigration into the West on grounds of 'tolerance' and 'inclusion', but it's all about "Is it good for Jews?" It's obvious from so many New York Times op-eds that what Jews want is to destroy white majority power and create a crazy-quilt nation so that they can play divide-and-rule among goyim from above. That's all it's about. And notice how Jewish Power, both Republican and Democratic, work behind the scenes to shut down BDS even though it is mostly deemed a leftist movement. Why are Jewish 'progressives' working with Jewish Republicans(and cuck-christo-Goppers) to destroy BDS, a movement for justice for Palestinians? Because most Jewish Liberals are Jews first and Liberals second. Or, they are Jewish Supremacists first and Jewish humanists second. Even in the bluest states, powerful Jewish Liberals have worked with even hardline Republicans(worthless christo-cucks, the most of them) to shut down BDS. New York is said to be one of the most 'liberal' states, but its cuck-governor bans BDS. Texas and NY are seen as red vs blue, but when it comes to Jews uber Palestinians, both are totally agreed that the US must serve Jews no matter what. And in Florida, a bill is about to become law that would ban speech that notices Jewish power, Jewish supremacism, and Zionist tyranny over Palestinians. Such a law isn't about humans. It's about gods, premised on the notion that Jews are so holy, great, awesome, and wondrous that it would be downright blasphemous to cast negative aspersions on Jewish Power, notice wicked patterns of behavior among Jews, connect the dots of Jewish influence, condemn Wars for Israel, and call out on Zionist tyranny over Palestinians(and others). Jews say they are condemning 'hate speech', but they are pushing blasphemy laws with themselves as new gods.
Also, if Jews are so concerned about how 'Hate Speech' may lead to violence against powerless minorities, why were they so silent about all those 'liberal' Hollywood movies and TV shows that feature Muslims and Arabs as terrorist madmen or token 'good guys'(who are good ONLY WHEN they collaborate with the US empire against other Muslims)? If Jews are so sensitive about victim-hood, why do they promote violent rap music that celebrates gun violence, rape, & mayhem and call women 'bitches' and 'ho's'? If Jews are so worried about how 'hate speech' may lead to new atrocities and wars, why do the Jewish-run media spew so much Hate News against Iran, Syrians, Arabs, and Russians? Didn't Fake News and Hate News under Bush II and Obama lead to bloodbaths in Iraq, Libya, and Syria? And if Jews despise Trump as 'literally Hitler', why are they most silent and even supportive of him when he is most belligerent, demagogic, and warlike in his hysteria about Iran and Venezuela? It seems Jews don't mind Trump being 'literally Hitler' as long as it's against peoples and nations hated by Jews. Indeed, Jews even form alliances with Literally Nazi elements in Ukraine to get what they want. They even cheer on ISIS psychopaths to wreck Syria, an ally of Iran, IF it is deemed Good for Israel.

The 'moral' logic of Holocaust Remembrance is like that of Globo-Homo-Mania. Initially, the 'gay' agenda was sold as freedom for homosexuals. We didn't have to approve them or welcome them. It was based on the scientific truth that some people are born with homo tendencies, and it's not their fault. Also, as people have feelings, it's not good to insult and harm homosexuals. Just let them be. And most Americans went along with this. But, it soon turned out that this GloboHomo business wasn't just about tolerance of deviancy and freedom for perverts but a supremacist idolatry of homos(and even trannies) as an angel-like special people whom we must feel compelled to celebrate, praise, lionize, and rhapsodize over. As for those who refuse to do so and call out on the true nature of the 'gay' agenda, they are to be deemed as 'homophobic', or sick in the head and unfit to reach upper ranks of society where all the goodies are. Even a huge chain like Chick-Fil-A is to be denied access to cities like Chicago where mass celebrations of Anno Sodomini takes place annually. Apparently, Dick-Fill-Ass is what the US is really about.

Both Holocaust Remembrance and Globo-Homo have been sold as being about justice, equality, and anti-supremacism, but both are actually predicated on the supremacist notion that Jews and homos(their main allies and most tireless globalist agents) are special and deserve praise, adulation, and obedience above and beyond all other peoples. Clever Jews have coated the poison pill of Jewish supremacism with anti-supremacist sweetener. In the mouth, it tastes like 'equality and justice' but dissolves in the stomach to spread mindless support of Jewish Supremacism. At AIPAC rallies, Jews and cucks make big speeches about 'Never Again' and 'No to Hate', all the while pledging undying support for Zionist tyranny against Palestinians, Wars for Israel, mindless hatred against Iran, and defamation of whites who insist on having an identity emancipated from the clutches of the Shylock Doctrine.

Jews could have used Holocaust Remembrance to learn and teach a greater lesson for all mankind. It could have been about how it's wrong for ANY would-be supremacists to wipe out another people. Alas, the lesson has become just another form of Supremacism, i.e. we need to remember the Holocaust forever and ever because the victims were JEWS, the holy and superior race. The lesson became selective than universal.
Even the Jewish-controlled Narrative of the US is about "Is it good for Jews?" Jews say Immigration was noble because it was great for their own kind. But didn't Immigration of Europeans and Jews lead to the 'genocide' of native indigenous folks? Didn't Jewish Hollywood make tons of Westerns lionizing the white pioneers who rubbed out the Indians? Didn't immigration lead to Nakba Pogroms that wiped Palestine off the map? Never mind all that. Too inconvenient for the Judeo-centric Narrative.
Jews say they are for universal principles and reach for a global audience on that basis, but their ultimate message isn't "equal justice for all humans" but "all humans must agree to praise, worship, and serve Jews and furthermore ensure that all the world will be good for Jews". Jews are not surrendering to universalism but exploiting its reach to make humans serve Jews as the god-race.

But then, the very notion of Jewishness is essentially supremacist as it's based on the conviction that the one true God chose Jews to be masters over all humanity. Indeed, when so-called progressive Jews cling to Jewishness, they are sticking to an exclusionary identity-ideology that says Jews are special and more blessed than others. Even among secular Jews, this mental habit seems to remain. Some Jews argue that Jewishness is about Jews minding their own business and demanding to be left alone by goy bigots. But Jewishness isn't like being Amish, a culture that really just wants to be left alone. Jewishness is about Jews excluding goyim from their own world but making all the goy world include Jewish Power as the righteous master and ruler over all of humanity. It is a mad contradiction, a psycho-political dilemma at the root of the world's biggest problems and conflicts.

If Holocaust Remembrance really has a universal lesson to impart, it should be that ANY PEOPLE can act like Nazis and ANY PEOPLE can end up like Jewish victims. If the message is truly anti-supremacist, then no people are innately nobler than others & no people are innately more wicked than others. Germans who were once Nazis could suffer like Jews did under Nazi tyranny. Jews, who were once victimized, could become like Nazis and terrorize the world. In other words, any people, even Germans, could become 'Jews' in the metaphorical sense, and any people, even Jews, could become 'Nazis' in the metaphorical sense. But according to Holocaust Remembrance, we are to fixate on Jews as the Eternal Victims no matter what they do in the future. Such Moral Privilege is a form of supremacism. It implies that even if Jews were to act like Nazis, they shall always be morally shielded with the Anne Frank card. And even when Germans face replacement and extinction, they are to be regarded as 'Nazis' forever. This is crazy, and the Holocaust is now just a Holo-Curse.