Three Kinds of Treason: The Good, the Bad, and the Clueless — The West, the Rest, and Rebellion — James Comey the Scummy — Delusional Symbolic Morality of Justice Junkies

Let’s consider the three kinds of Treason(though surely there are other kinds). The first is a kind of higher loyalty directed by conscience and moral compass. The second is driven mainly by greed & opportunism(and cravenness). The third kind of treason feels like the first kind(an act of conscience) to the traitor but is actually manipulated by a devious power with lock on media and academia. In the modern West, many white people have found themselves in one of the three categories.

Generally speaking, ‘Treason’ is a dirty word. But it is also a relative concept. Benedict Arnold is considered to have been a traitor, but one could argue that the thirteen colonies were treasonous against the Mother Country and the King. Robert E. Lee was loyal to Virginia, but Virginia was deemed to be treasonous to the Union. Also, it wasn't unusual for a person to have divided loyalties. During the Civil War, a mother could find one of her sons fighting for the North and the other fighting for the South. Who was the traitor in the family?

And in a way, many great leaps of human discovery and advancement were the products of a kind of treason. Mythologies are filled with themes of righteous or liberating treason. Young gods rebel against older gods and take over the divine realm. Prometheus, half-man/half-god, betrayed the gods in stealing their fire and passing it to mankind. Christianity could not have been born without ‘treasonous’ Jews such as Jesus, Peter, and Paul whose conception of God’s will and design was seen as heretical, blasphemous, and intolerable to the Jewish community.
And America was born of Inspired and Idealistic Treason against the supposed Tyranny of the British Empire(and the Mother Country). All great revolutions were acts of rebellion, indeed treason, against the existing order. One could also say all of life is the product of treason. A daughter, the beloved of her father, goes off with another man and becomes his. The movie FATHER OF THE BRIDE illustrates the father’s ambivalence in giving his daughter away. (This may be a bigger problem when the groom is a man of another race, as in OTHELLO when the white hussy goes off with a blackamoor). And so often in life, the son finally becomes a man by standing up to his father in an act of defiance. Even as the father or father-figure resents such rebellion, there is also a sense of pride in the realization that the child has grown into a man and can finally think and act for himself. It is why John Wayne characters in RED RIVER and THE SEARCHERS come to grudgingly accept and even admire the younger partner as having grown into full manhood with a mind and will of his own. Without that element of rebellion against the father, a man will never be his own man. He will never be a wolf and remain a dog all his life.

Indeed, this was one reason why the West advanced far ahead of the East. In Asia, there was far greater emphasis on sons to remain obedient to their fathers and on subjects to remain loyal to their masters/rulers. In China and Japan, there was nothing worse than being accused of disloyalty and treason. And in India, the complex caste system demanded strict adherence to rules of social belonging and obligations. Anyone deviating from his caste duties could come under the harshest punishment. It was seen as treason against the cosmic will, the Karma.

Things were somewhat different in the West. While it also placed great emphasis on loyalty and fealty to kings, lords, church, and patriarchs, there was more leeway and wiggle room for individuality, independence, and liberty. Part of the reason was genetic. White people were innately less servile than East Asians. (If racial and cultural uniformity may have encouraged conformism in East Asia — people who look alike tend to think and act alike — , excessive diversity in India may have necessitated an iron regimen of conformism to maintain the order. Diversity + Freedom = Chaos. Therefore, to keep the peace among so many different ethnic groups, the spiritual-cultural order of India had to insist on the most obsessive adherence to core caste principles of Hinduism. If the Jewish Covenant spiritualized the ethnic uniqueness of the Tribe, Hindu Karma spiritualized one's caste obligations as a sacred duty. The Covenant united Jews in body and soul. In the most intricate way, Karma both separated and interwove the lives of so many castes of Hindus. Perhaps, Jews might have devised something like a caste system had they come to rule over vast numbers of gentiles but, unlike the Aryans who gained dominance over India, Jews were generally surrounded by far more powerful empires. Thus, the main obsession of Jews was preservation of their own identity. But in today's world, Jewish Supremacists have become the Master Race overlords in the World, and in the rapidly diversifying West we are seeing the rise of neo-caste-systems that are unavoidable with excessive Diversity. Earlier, Latin America already and organically ended up with a caste system even though such wasn't explicitly devised as had been in India long ago.) Another reason for the greater spirit of rebellion in the West owed to Christianity that said there is a Higher Power and Higher Truth than anything devised or known by man. Indeed, Christianity itself produced a rebellion called Protestantism that denounced the corruption of the Catholic Church. Catholic Church accused Protestants of heresy and treason, but Protestants accused the Church of having betrayed God.
Also, unlike pagan gods who weren't all-powerful and compromised by their failings, Christianity said there is only One God and One Truth; and Jesus was the Son of God, the Perfect Man sent to Earth to die for mankind’s sins. So, even as a European might serve his King or Lord, he believed there is a Truth and Justice far greater than any temporal master on Earth. As such, it was justified in the eyes of the righteous to betray one’s lord to serve the higher good and higher glory. Such a betrayal is at the center of BECKET where the eponymous hero(played by Richard Burton) betrays his friend(played by Peter O’Toole) and king for the higher truth. And in CHARIOTS OF FIRE, the devout sprinter believes he must go against God and Country to remain faithful to the greater glory of God.


Of course, a people who are overly rebellious and treasonous will cause social chaos and havoc. But a people who are overly servile and obedient will not produce the kind of individuals with the audacity to think differently. After all, all great change are bold acts of 'treason' against the status quo. To achieve the power of flight, one has to defy what most people presume to be impossible. A short story by Ray Bradbury, "The Flying Machine", surmises that China fell behind the West because its rulers and elites favored status quo, harmony, and continuity over leaps and bounds in history. So, even as the flying machine is marveled at, the inventor is to be put to death because his wondrous contraption violates the existing harmony. Such momentous leap in possibility may well upend the entire social order... indeed the kind that enveloped Great Britain in the Industrial Revolution. That was a profound rebellion against tradition and nature. Ironically, the fact that the Romantics denounced Industrialization’s war on nature and countryside in a poetic and passionate way shows that they too were imbued with the spirit of defiance. Industry defied nature with machinery, and Romantics defied machinery with imagination.

We can go on and on with many other examples, but the point is, even as Treason is usually regarded in a negative light, it(or an aspect of it) is intrinsic to every great change. In the Ayn-Randian myth-making, the great innovative hero can’t help but upset the existing order by envisioning something no one had thought before. As such, he is met with fierce resistance and opposition from conservative, conventional, or controlling forces that insist on continuity of established forms, ideas, and means.


For some people, an act of treason is a moral necessity. A famous example involved the German officers who conspired to assassinate Adolf Hitler. Though their plan was clearly an act of treason, the conspirators felt they must do something to bring an end to Der Fuhrer’s madness. (Those in the Deep State who are now conspiring against Trump may be seen by some as today's 'Good Germans', but if the German officers conspired against Hitler for his reckless warmongering that brought Germany to the brink of ruin, today's Deep State operatives are the warmongers who hate Trump because he spoke in favor of peace with Russia, no more Middle East wars, and limited nationalism than for boundless globalist neo-imperialist hegemony.) More recently, there was Edward Snowden who spilled the beans on the Deep State to expose its abuses and general contempt for the American public and other nations, even supposed allies. Of course, James Comey would have us believe that he too acted out of ‘higher loyalty’ to the greater good, but revelations show that his loyalty was to the Deep State. He is a sleazebag and slimeball, and one wonders how such a lowlife could have ascended so high in government. But then, it makes perfect sense because any kind of complex organization usually favors yes-men, toadies, ass-kissers, boot-lickers, and shmoozers over mavericks, free thinkers, and men of honesty. Comey’s combination of craven careerism and schoolmarm-ish moralism not only made him an ideal candidate to climb the ladder but the kind of fool who could easily dupe himself into thinking he is a real-life Atticus Finch. In fact, Comey was always a teacher’s pet whose horizons as careerist and pseudo-moralist never veered from the conventional path of what-to-do and what-to-think. It goes to show that intelligence and diligence are not enough to create a real human being. Comey is a classic company-man-type. He is a suit, an empty suit at that devoid of real soul and agency. He dutifully swallowed all the a-b-c’s of do-goody PC without question, led the life of a cucky-wuck hubby-and-dad, and climbed the ‘corporate ladder’ of the Deep State. Thus, for Comey the Deep State drone, it has always been all-for-the-company and in the spirit of PC ‘progressivism’, the verity and validity of which he never gave any consideration because his personality is of the type that never deviates from the path chosen for him by others.

In contrast, Edward Snowden, while no saint, really did embark on a course of action that took courage and conscience. One may argue Snowden was overly idealistic, naive, egoistical, or judgmental, but the fact is he fully understood that his life would never be the same after spilling the beans on the NSA. It would especially be risky because he would make Obama’s administration look bad. At least if Bush or McCain had been president, Snowden’s act of betrayal might have gotten sympathetic coverage from the ‘Liberal’ Media or the ‘Progressive’ community. But because he exposed the Deep State under Obama, almost all the powers-that-be in media, academia, and Deep State(all controlled by Judeo-Nazi Democrats) decided to collude to make his life as miserable as possible.
Snowden’s deed was clearly an act of treason but also an act of counter-treason as Snowden believed that the Deep State had betrayed the trust of the American people and the protections guaranteed by the Constitution. His act was truly that of higher loyalty. He didn’t do it for money, privilege, or power but to expose the truth of the Deep State and what it was capable of in not only spying on American citizens but subverting foreign nations, all the communication networks of which had been infiltrated or sabotaged by the US government. Snowden exposed that the US as the Lone Superpower functions not as a democracy but operates as a Deepocracy. Power and Righteousness(as the ‘exceptional’ and ‘indispensable’ nation) have not only corrupted but blinded the people in the Deep State to their own arrogance, corruption, and foulness. They are worse than organized criminals who, at the very least, know they are crooked scum of the earth. In contrast, all the vile deeds of the FBI, CIA, NSA, and the Pentagon are whitewashed with the conceit of the US as the necessary policeman, judge, and jury of the world.

Men like Snowden and Joachim Fest’s father(who refused to serve the Nazi regime) are relatively rare. Even people who want to do likewise haven’t got the spine to stick their necks out. This is understandable for obvious reasons in tyrannical societies where those suspected of treason or disloyalty could be locked up or even executed. Because Stalin destroyed even those who were loyal to him, a climate of fear gripped the USSR, and as such, few dared to say or do anything that carried even the slightest whiff of dissent. (Soviet government was bound to be paranoid and repressive because everyone involved in the creation of the New Order was radical, ruthless, cunning, devious, and subversive. Unlike the American Republic that was formed more-or-less by like-minded, like-cultured, and like-blooded Anglos, the 'Russian' Revolution was made by groups intoxicated with extreme ideology and/or extreme personality. Stalin knew it was either his faction or the other faction. And he knew about the nasty personality of Jews, which he countered with his Georgian-Caucasian bandit cutthroat cunning that totally blindsided Jews who thought they could outwit him.) But then, freedom + opportunity can also turn people into craven cowards. This may seem counter-intuitive because freedom and opportunity connote individuality, high spirits, and daring. But freedom and opportunity also mean possibility of great success in wealth and privilege. And those who become addicted to and defined by wealth and privilege become deathly afraid of losing their trophies and treasures by saying the ‘wrong’ word or doing the ‘wrong’ thing. Consider the sudden fall of Donald Sterling from grace and fortune simply because he told his mulatto mistress to stop whoring around too much with Negro ball-players. That's all it took to bring down someone that big. So, in a way, a very libertine America has created a class of uber-successful cowards and dorks. While they have the individual spirit and drive to make great gains in business or some endeavor, their addiction to success makes them fearful of bad publicity. Since one’s reputation is determined by the prevailing PC and the media(almost entirely controlled by Jews in the West), the rich and/or successful dare not step on the wrong toes.

So, the US is a paradoxical society where freedom to succeed has actually diminished freedom of thought among the very successful. If you can’t rise too high or make too much money, it’s no great loss to say the ‘wrong’ word and be demoted or fired. Suppose you have a job making $80,000 a year but get fired for courageously sticking up for your beliefs and have to settle for a job making $50,000. It’s a loss but not something totally momentous. But suppose you have an opportunity to make $100 million but could lose it all by saying the ‘wrong’ word... like Don Imus with the 'nappy-headed hos' remark. You’re likely to play it safe and just go along with the Official Dogma and Approved Narrative(that define who is respectable and who isn’t) to make the big bucks. Cucks make the bucks.
It is then no wonder that so many successful people just caved to ‘gay marriage’. As Jews control the media, academia, law firms, and government, they got to decide what is ‘more evolved’ and what is ‘hateful’ or ‘irrational’. Ill repute could lead to shunning by the ‘right kind of people’, and therefore, one learns to play along and go along... as the eponymous character intended to do in BARRY LYNDON to win favor among the aristocrats.

The second kind of Treason involves those without conscience. They will betray anyone just for personal greed. Take Paulie in THE GODFATHER who, it turns out, cut a deal with the Tataglias for extra cash. Guys like Paulie lack not only moral conscience but even the slightest modicum of honor. Real slimeballs, they will do ANYTHING to get ‘what is mine’. This is a characteristic commonly found among Southern Italians, Greeks, and Hispanics. Greasy and sleazy, such types are incapable of shame, let alone remorse, as they stoop to any level to get ‘what is mine’. They usually have the personalities of toadies and sidekicks. They are like the couple of hoodlums in MIDNIGHT RUN who serve as a foil to the pair made up of Robert De Niro and Charles Grodin.

De Niro’s character won’t take a bribe, and Grodin’s character got in trouble because he did the right thing(like Edward Snowden). In contrast, the two toady hoodlums will do just about anything to get ‘what is mine’ in their sordid world of crime and corruption. And the other bounty hunter, Marvin, is also a sleazebag. At one point, he is willing to sell the Duke(Grodin) to the gang boss for a million dollars. (He must be an Irish pig.)

The world has TOO MANY people who will betray their convictions, principles, and values just to get ‘what is mine’. The criminal world is full of them, but then, so is the legitimate world. People just love money, success, privilege, and pleasure at any cost. Look at the Mormons who preach morality but are always willing to cut deals with Big Money to rake in the dough. Mormons are fake moralists. Their clean-cut lifestyles create the impression of morality but really serve as a shield to hide all their materialist-driven compromises. Look at the total scum Mitt Romney. Or conehead Evan McMullin. But then, US elite society is filled with these careerist-opportunist liars who betray their core principles just to get ‘what is mine’. Just how is it that all those Republican Conservatives who supposedly believe in Family Values didn’t raise the slightest opposition to the agenda of Homomania? Where was their conviction?
The fact is they were mainly concerned with their careers in a nation where most top industries and institutions are controlled by Jews who can make or break anyone via the media that decree who is of good or ill repute. As Jews promoted Homomania as the neo-religion(even replacement for Christianity), even the most 'conservative' members of the GOP just went along because what mattered most to them was not courage of conviction but careerism and opportunity. Why open their mouths and risk losing lucrative careers as politicians(who rely on Jewish money and media coverage) and lobbyists and lawyers(upon leaving office).
Even law firms, now mostly controlled by the Tribe, only serve clients and cases deemed safe and ‘reputable’ by the Jews. So, the side that opposed ‘gay marriage’ in defense of True Marriage before the Supreme Court couldn’t get any support from top law firms. And top Jewish-run law firms are using all their resources to sue Richard Spencer and shut him down while truly courageous dissidents can’t get any representation.


Even though the second kind of Treason is crass and lowdown, at least there’s an element of honesty. Craven careerists and weasely opportunists know they’re just in it for the money, for ‘what is mine’. They betray morality, values, and principles to move up the ladder or feed at the trough. Now, people like Paulie in THE GODFATHER aren’t betraying principles or values because they got none. Paulie betrayed the Corleones, his employers, but he didn’t betray his own values because he’s utterly devoid of any moral sense. At Connie’s wedding, the Chico-Marx-lookalike-jerk mutters to himself about how he would steal the money bag if it were anyone else’s. So, a total slimebag like that has no sense of morality to betray. The most he can do is betray other people.

In contrast, there are many people who do have a sense of values but betray them out of material self-interest, social approval, or cowardice. If they’re honest, they will admit, at least to themselves and maybe close ones, that they’ve betrayed moral values for material values. If less dishonest, they will rationalize their compromises with all sorts of twisted logic. If truly dishonest, they will pretend that their act of betrayal was actually done out of realization of higher morality. A good example is Charles Murray changing his mind on ‘gay marriage’. The craven bald-headed fool caved to Jews and Homos, but he desperately tried to convince himself that his change of heart was brought upon by becoming ‘more evolved’. Not much better is Ross Douthat, the chunkheaded pompous Catholic jerk, who got down on his knees and begged for ‘terms of surrender’. In other words, he’d be willing to bend over and take it up the ass but please oh please, don’t force Christian bakers to make ‘gay wedding’ cakes. Some courageous Christian. And since when do Jews and homos show any respect or consideration for craven cuck-cowards like chunkhead Douthat? Opportunists like Murray and Douthat can rationalize all they want, but deep down inside, I know and they know that they caved under pressure because they don’t have the true grit, the kind of character that informed Joachim Fest’s father who refused to go along with the Nazis. Murray and Douthat are ultimately little more than putty in the hands of Judeo-Nazis.

Finally, the third kind of Treason is the most problematic. Suppose we apply the three types of Treason to white people. Let’s consider the first kind of Treason, that of higher loyalty to Truth and Honor. Suppose there is a white nation that is committing a grave wrong to a non-white nation. Suppose a white person in the white nation betrays his own nation and sticks up for the non-white nation out of moral conviction. So, even though he wants to be loyal to his nation, the great wrong compels him to stick up for the other nation. When Ron Paul and Pat Buchanan opposed the Iraq War, they were accused of treason by many Conservatives. But their ‘treason’ made a moral argument against what they deemed to be illegal and unjustifiable US actions. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11, and the US had no legitimate reason to bomb or invade Iraq.
Now, let’s consider the second kind of Treason, that of craven opportunism, among white people. The most obvious example of this is all those white politicians and cuck-elites saying or doing anything, even at great harm to their own race and nation, just to win favors from all-powerful Jews. Whether Democratic or Republican, most white politicians, members of the Deep State, or big business will betray their own race and nation if serving Jews will further their careers or fill their pockets. They’ve grown so cynical and/or shameless in a debased Jewish-run nation of amorality that they don’t believe in anything but their personal status and prestige. Patriotism is gone in a US that is no longer a white nation. Faith is gone in a nation that is no longer about God but about holy homos. And morality is gone in a nation where most kids grow up to rap, trash, tattoos, and piercings. In such a fallen world, what is the only thing worth salvaging? Gimme ‘what is mine’.

The first and second kinds of Treason are easy to understand. The first kind is about higher morality and conscience. The second kind is about base desires. Though the first and second kind are different, they have one thing in common: Agency. The man of higher morality thinks and reasons on his own and comes to his own conclusion of what must be done. The man of base desires may not be admirable of character but, at the very least, he freely chooses to act out of craven greed.
But what about the third kind? It is marked by lack of agency. The person who practices the third kind of Treason is convinced that he or she is acting out of higher morality but is really nothing but a tool. Consider all the pussy-hatted white feminists or SJW-types into self-righteous supremacist vanity. They believe they are betraying the white race for the noblest reasons. They associate whiteness with ‘racism’, ‘white privilege’, patriarchy’, ‘xenophobia’, and etc. As GOOD white people, they believe that their anti-white stance speaks volumes about their higher virtue. After all, they’ve transcended base tribalism of us-versus-them and have chosen to side with rest of humanity in the name of Social Justice, Diversity, and Inclusion. The people afflicted with the third kind of Treason really feel this way. But do they have agency?

Of course not. Take James Comey, a race-traitor who serves the Jewish-controlled Deep State that is hell-bent on destroying White America. Comey may believe himself to be a goody-good white man with a ‘higher loyalty’ who counters white ‘racism’ to make for a better America founded on the principles of MLK’s teachings. But did James Comey, a man with a teacher’s pet personality and company-man's lack-of-imagination, ever dare to think outside the Box of what he was told by the media and academia? Did he ever ask hard questions about the Power? Did he ever notice that the Power is full of hypocrisy? Was he ever self-aware of the fact that he violated FBI codes of conduct to favor certain outcomes in service of End-of-History that insists on hegemony of US as the ‘indispensable’ and ‘exceptional’ nation, presumably because the US is about Jew-worship, Magic-Negro-and-Mandingo-Worship, and Homomania? Has there ever been a man so tall in body but so tiny in understanding? Still, one could argue that Comey-ism doesn’t really qualify as the third kind of Treason. His treachery could be categorized with the second kind. He is essentially an opportunist and company man. He may have deluded himself that his betrayal of Trump and the white race is about ‘higher loyalty’, but he’s always been about climbing the ladder and serving his own career. He may see himself as a kind of proggy Howard Roark, but he is actually pure Peter Keating. Indeed, had he grown up in Nazi Germany or Commie East Germany, he would have been someone like Adolf Eichmann, a yes-man who just swallowed the official dogma and followed orders.
Keep in mind that Comey violated the rules of the FBI not out of personal conscience(as Snowden did) but in total obeisance to Deep State power. The order came down to protect Hillary Clinton, and he did just that. Also, his meteoric rise in the agency suggests he was spotted early on as the kind of toady who will dutifully serve The Power above all. The Power controlled him in body, mind, and soul. And Comey was fine with that because his pathological personality wants to be accepted, approved, and appointed.

In contrast, there are white race-traitors who truly and sincerely believe that their treachery is for the higher good. They believe their Treason is of the first kind, a greater loyalty to a higher justice. They see themselves as above the brutish tribal politics of ‘us versus them’. They see themselves as possessing sympathy and compassion that too many tribal white ‘racists’ lack. Even when they are told that their positions will lead to White Genocide, they stick to the anti-white program in the conviction that whites must atone and pay the price for their unforgivable historical crimes. They feel so noble of heart and soul that they are even willing to sacrifice their racial-communal well-being for world justice. Also, unlike the Comeys, Hillarys, Bidens, McCains, and Bushes of the world, these race-traitors of the third kind of Treason have little to gain by spouting the nonsense that they do. They usually gain nothing by posturing as deracinated do-gooders. So, at the very least, they are not primarily opportunists and company-men like Comey or other such sleazeballs.

But they are nevertheless delusional moral morons because they lack agency and understanding of The Power and how it works. Indeed, it is doubtful if these clowns had a single independent, autonomous, or original thought/observation in their entire lives. Everything they believe and say is just druggy incantation of PC catechisms planted in their minds by Jewish-run academia or media. And the idolatry that governs their imagination is the product of Hollywood and Jewish-run music industry. Indeed, the narrowly selective nature of their social justice sympathies shows how utterly controlled by Jews they are. Because the West is so thoroughly Jewish-controlled, the general rule is "The more your views align with the agenda and narrative of the Empire of Judea, the more you are a tool of The Power." Because most Jews are Zionist, anti-white, Homomaniacal, pro-Mass-Invasions(to all nations except Israel), and promote interracism(with black men) for white women & cuckery for white males, the chances are you are a total tool and puppet of Jews if you, as a white gentile, also support those policies to a tee. Granted, there is a chance that you, all on your own, arrived at the same conclusions, but there is a greater chance of winning a national lottery.

The more you diverge from official dogma and narrative, the more you’re independent of The Power controlled by Jews. This is why Jews are using all their power to attack the Alt Right more than any other force. Alt Right is the most liberated and emancipated in mind and body from The Power. Paradoxically however, the further right you veer from the Alt Right, the more you’re likely to be an Unwitting Tool of the Jews because it is in the interest of Jews to associate any white identity politics as ‘nazi’. Indeed, the 14/88 and Neo-Nazi elements are not what Jews fear most. If anything, Jews find such lunatics and losers very useful as ‘bad optics’ to smear White Identitarians with. It is then not very surprising that some of the key leaders of Neo-Nazism have actually been closet-Jews. In Canada, Jews encouraged Neo-Nazis and skinheads to make a scene in order to use the ‘scandal’ to fear-monger and push for Hate Speech Laws. (Of course, Zionist Judeo-Nazi vitriol against Palestinians and Muslims is not deemed as ‘hate speech’.) This is why ADL and SPLC fear Jared Taylor far more than David Duke. Whatever Duke says, right or wrong, the Jews can always smear him as the ‘former Grand Wizard of the KKK’. But no such smear can be done to Jared Taylor, which is why Taylor has been banned from Twitter but Duke hasn’t been. And in the end, it is Mike Enoch’s intelligent and rational discussion of the Jewish Question that trigger Jewish Supremacists. Jews don’t fear the side of Enoch that larps as ‘nazi’ because Jews could always use it to smear the Alt Right.

This is why Ramzpaul had a point in bemoaning Alt Right’s flirtation with parodi-nazis like Andrew Anglin.

Even the slightest association of the Alt Right with ‘nazi’ element will be used by Jews to smear the entire movement. In contrast, New York Times can run sympathetic articles about Marxism and Maoism because (1) Communism was once a weapon of Jews to smash Christian Churches and to kill millions of Slavs and (2) Communism has been regarded as the main enemy and destroyer of fascism(though, ironically, Israel adopted a fascist conception of the nation-state, and former communist nations like China and Russia are now governed along lines that resemble fascist theory of power and history).

Anyway, one look at something like the Pussy March, and you know that all these deracinated and insipid race traitors lack agency. I mean, what self-respecting person imitates countless other minions and idiots whose idea of ‘social justice’ is wearing a ‘pussy hat’ or walking around in pussy costumes? All their chants and slogans are tiresome cliches spoon-fed to them since cradle. The sheer lack of coherence and consistency in their world-view proves how feeble of mind and weak of conscience they are. Their hysteria is not the outpouring of deep passion but desperation of people who must throw tantrums to again attention for their 'virtue' toy-playing. "Look Ma, I'm so goody-good." It’s like a crybaby who wants love, attention, and huggy-wug. Their movement is about tantrums of the Current Year, not deep passion for what really matters.

These people have hive-minds. Their morality is purely symbolic than substantive. So, the ONLY reason they opposed the Iraq War was because they hated Bush. The only reason they were silent about Obama’s wars and greater destruction in the Middle East and Ukraine was because Obama had the ‘progressive’ symbolism of being a ‘historic’ black president. Granted, there are plenty of such morons on the American Right as well. They supported Edward Snowden only because he made Obama’s administration look bad. But if Snowden had spilled the beans on the Bush regime, then many of those Rightard dolts would have hated him and called him a ‘traitor’.
Symbolic justice/morality is really a form of injustice. Consider Bradley ‘Chelsea’ Manning who was pardoned by Obama ONLY BECAUSE he’s a tranny. Because of the symbolic value of LGBTQ in the current PC, Manning got a get-out-of-jail-free-card. If not for that symbolism, he would have rotted away in prison for a couple of decades. And because of the symbolic value of Jews(and Jewish clout in law and government), Jonathan Pollard got pardoned and rewarded by rich Jews with a plush job. This man was a total traitor, but Jews take care of their own. Indeed, while Pollard was in prison, Jew-run Media always ran Christ-like photo of him.

And in the case of Charlottesville, Deandre Harris the thug was set free because his blackness has symbolic value. In contrast, Jacob Scott Goodwin who counter-attacked him for having attacked a white guy is facing ten years in prison. This is how Symbolic Justice works in PC-ruled US, one where illegal alien leeches are symbolized into sacred 'dreamers'. If your identity has symbolic value, you get ‘affirmative justice' points. But if you’re a white guy and totally innocent, you are attacked and persecuted even though it is YOU who have been victimized. Richard Spencer, for instance, is being sued by Powerful Jewish Law firms because he symbolizes ‘white supremacy’.
Now, we know how Palestinians feel. One of the biggest mistakes that white race made was sympathizing with Zionists over Palestinians. Whites thought that if they supported Jewish nationalism and identity, Jews would reciprocate and support white people. Instead, Jews decided to do to whites on a grand scale what they’d done to the Palestinians. The West is now turning into a giant West Bank. White voices are being silenced. White people are fired and destroyed. They are denied justice and representation. They are dehumanized by the Judeo-Nazi media and entertainment.


The fact that so much of Western ‘justice’ is now based on symbolism than substance is proof that most White Race Traitors are more dogs than humans. They have no understanding of anything except on the surface of which-group-is-deemed-holy and which-group-is-deemed-wicked by the Powers-that-be. Indeed, most Progs are too lazy and stupid to do any searching for themselves and just rely on either Jew-run MSM, Organized Education, or Hollywood(!!) for their impression of how the world works and what is happening. When a truth-teller on black crime like Colin Flaherty gathered up all the evidence of bad black behavior, the Jews-who-run Youtube took him down.

As far as Jews are concerned, reality is too triggering and undermining of Jewish supremacist power. To prop up their tribal domination, Jews need to favor symbolism over substance. Because Jewish supremacism cannot operate without White gentile submissivism and because White Submissivism cannot exist unless White Identity & Pride are paralyzed with ‘white guilt’ and white cuckery(before the Negro), Jews push the symbolism of the Magic Negro and Mandingo. The Magic Negro myth promotes the symbolism of blacks as the perfect children of the christian god(of course, the Jewish God favors Jews), a people horribly wronged by wicked and satanic whites who must atone forever. And Mandingo myth — it is time to replace TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD in classrooms with MANDINGO the novel — says blacks are the true master race with more muscle and bigger dongs. So, there is the symbolism of blacks as noble victims deserving of white guilt & sympathy and as nature’s true aristocrats, the authentic race that must be worshiped by slow, dweeby, and flabby white boys who should surrender their women to the superior black men.

Now, if we sweep aside the bogus symbolism, a more sensible view would be, "Yes, it’s true that blacks were once enslaved or discriminated against in the US, and it is also true that blacks are more muscular and tougher than whites." So, what does that mean in the real world? It means blacks can kick white ass. It means black thugs are filled with arrogance and contempt for the ‘faggoty-ass white boy’. It means blacks don’t believe in equal dignity with the white race but feel that white wombs exist to be colonized by black seed and white boys' faces deserve to be smashed by black fists. It means black males see white males as ‘white boys’ who should suck up to blacks. In other words, it’s a clusterfuc* of complexity with no easy solutions.

But do NOT expect the SJW self-righteous-supremacist types to be aware of anything. They have no idea that their anti-white treason is a programming coded into their minds by Jewish Supremacist globalists, the real terrorists of the World (Dis)order. They just go for symbolism of black holiness... just like plenty of idiotic ‘conservatives’ on the so-called ‘American Right’ fixate on the symboism of Jews as a Holy Holocaust people who can never do any wrong... which is why Pat Buchanan has to school that idiot Sean Hannity on why Bibi Netanyahu is so full of shi*.

Anyway, the third kind of Treason is about the controlled minds of pets and dogs of PC. There is no agency, no real conscience, no true understanding of what is what or what is really happening in the world. It is about being addicted to the feeling of holier-than-thou, more ‘evolved’, more ‘righteous’, and pure-of-heart(which is hilarious when your average prog is a total degenerate). They are really more like crack addicts or sugar-junkies of delusional justice. They are Justice-Junkies whose idea of right-and-wrong has been totally implanted in their minds through electronica controlled by heinous Judeo-Nazis who continue to destroy Palestinian lives.
Granted, there are some people on the Left or Progressive side who are awaking to the bogusness of Russia Hysteria Conspiracy narrative, the corruption of Neo-Liberalism, and the urgency of Palestinian calls for justice. They also realize that Obama’s foreign policy was essentially a continuation of Neocon nuttery under Bush because, after all, there is no real difference between Zionist Neocons and Liberal Zionists who, in essence, play Good Cop and Bad Cop to fool the world.

Meritocratic Fallacy — Choosing the Brightest doesn’t necessarily choose the Best — Problems of Symbolic Morality over Real Morality among the Powerful

In the most basic sense, meritocracy is the fairest and most effective way of selecting the most capable. This is most obvious in sports. The fastest runner is the fastest runner. Fastest swimmer is the fastest swimmer. The heaviest-lifter is the heaviest-lifter. We can’t argue with the results. But, we also know that the most capable are not necessarily the best in terms of morality and character. We know that many top athletes are scummy lowlifes. Who can forget the saga of OJ? Still, there is an idolatrous aspect to our nature that wants to believe that the most talented, most skilled, or most able is also the best in character. This is why most action movies have heroes who are not only the best-looking but the toughest. There is an idealized combination of attractiveness, ability, and morality. Good guys look good and are really the best. The handsome hero of SHANE really is the fastest gun in the West. Even so, we don’t expect too many athletes or some such to be paragons of morality and ethics. (But then, in our nihilistic age, many thug athletes and rappers are admired precisely because they spit on norms of morality and decency.)

But what about the elites in law, academia, government, enterprise, and media? Unlike athletes who merely need to prove their mettle in brute strength, people who succeed with their minds must gain knowledge, attend prestigious schools, and demonstrate worth on many levels of human relations. Because education is about the teaching of history, literature, science, ideas, and culture, we would like to believe that those who won by intellectual meritocracy are indeed the best kind of people. Not only the smartest but the wisest and most judicious. After all, they read so many books and gained so much knowledge. Unlike sports where brutal performance is all that counts, academics isn’t only about getting good grades but attaining higher and deeper understanding of many facets of truth. Or so we like to think.

Now, there are certain inbuilt virtues within meritocracy itself. Any serious student must have the simple virtues of effort, diligence, discipline, commitment, and stamina. Without such habits and attitudes, one cannot do well in school(unless one happens to be a super-genius). But simple virtues are just that. They are useful in the service of attaining certain goals, but they don’t reveal the higher truth or deeper meaning. After all, simple virtues can be in the service of an evil system. Dutiful and sober men can work hard to support the system. The men in the German film DAS BOOT are high in simple virtues. They are men of commitment and patriotism. But they ultimately serve an evil system.

Higher virtue arises from the question of "What kind of power am I serving?" The main character of LIVES OF OTHERS is a hard-worker and has simple virtues. But for most of his life, he never asked whether what he is doing is worth doing. He's been a ‘good soldier’ who followed orders and did his duties. He has simple virtues but is blind to the full moral implications of his work... until something alters the course of his life.

This is worth keeping in mind because there is no guarantee that those who study hard really care about anything but status, privilege, and power. They may read books, do homework, pass exams, go to good schools, get degrees, and get good jobs, BUT they may not have cared about truth, justice, or meaning. Education for them was just a means of gaining credentials to have the Good Life. They are like the vapid yuppies of AMERICAN PSYCHO(horrible movie).

Now, one may argue that the very process of education will change a person. Surely, no matter how cynical or materialistic one may be, wouldn't he be moved, inspired, and transformed by the great knowledge that he absorbs from literature, history, psychology, humanities, and maybe even some courses on philosophy?
True enough, but then, is there a lasting impact of education on most people? Consider Billy Boy Clinton and Hillary Clinton. Two high-IQ people who read many books and attended top colleges. Then, why are they so shallow, cynical, scummy, vile, stupid, trashy, hideous, insipid, and despicable? What did they really learn from all those books and all those courses? Despite their high intelligence and credentials, why are they so lacking in ethics, conscience, virtue, balance, wisdom, and basic sanity? We would like to believe that people so smart who went to top schools and learned from the best professors and read many more books than we did would be people of genuine worth. But it seems the ONLY thing they ever cared about was egotism, vanity, privilege, fortune, and fame.

So, what does that tell you? Meritocracy in academics may, more or less, choose the brightest but far from the best. In the 50s and 60s, there was the idea that the best-and-the-brightest were going to do wonderful things for America. But even as many such people were indeed the brightest, they were not the best(in character). Robert McNamara was the poster-child of the divergence of brightness and best-ness. And after the fiasco of the Vietnam War, he came to realize this and felt bad for the rest of his life. Well, at least he had a conscience about it. But look around today. So many people who have high IQ, went to best schools, got the credentials, and were chosen for high positions turn out to be total scum. And even after they destroy everything, there is no sign of conscience. Look at the intellectuals and officials around Billy Boy Clinton and George Dubious Bush. Look at the brightest bulbs around Obama who helped him destroy nations around the world.

Some of these people went to the best schools. They got credentials and prestige. And yet, they act like gangsters, sociopaths, degenerates, and monsters. And someone explain how any sane, sensible, and moral person can endorse something like Homomania? Indeed, consider that Jews have the highest IQ and got the most education. And yet they are the biggest proponents of degenerate Homomania that conflates homo fecal penetration and tranny pud-cutting with the ‘rainbow’ that is then associated with cookies, sodas, and churches. Did Jews gain so much knowledge to peddle that kind of nonsense?

It may be that some people of ability will gravitate toward power out of ideals. They hope to gain power to do what is good for the people and nation. But the system has a way of choosing the talented-and-vapid over the talented-and-valid.
After all, one thing that becomes apparent to anyone seeking power is that the path is compromised. Even as doors open to people of ability and talent, they must also kiss a lot of ass, compromise their principles, keep their mouths shut, spout platitudes, and learn to go along. Such are necessary in any social setting, but it either turns idealists into cynics or exiles. As cynics, they do gain power eventually but come to care for nothing but the power. As exiles from the corrupt system, they maintain their ideals or integrity but they gain no power.
Generally speaking, the system seeks talent-and-vanity than talent-and-integrity. Those with real integrity have a serious problem rising up the ladder of power because they must remain silent, tell lies, or dirty their hands. They must play the game and keep their mouths shut. The must accede to the 'omerta' not unlike in GOODFELLAS.

In contrast, those who are talented and mainly into power for vanity don’t care if they must make compromises and even embrace corruption. They just want to be among the Winners and Players. And this may account as to why so much of the Deep State has genuine deep talent but is so utterly shallow when it comes to ideals, ethics, scruples, and principles. The filtering effect of power tends to keep out those with integrity in favor of those who will say or do anything to gain power. So, we have a world of Samantha Powers, John Boltons, John Yoos, James Comeys, Donald Rumsfelds, Hillary Clintons, Dick Cheneys, Victoria Nulands, and other such scumbags who aren’t troubled in the least by all the mess they cause around the world. They just want to be with the Winners and play the game of power.

But actually it’s even worse than that. These lowlife scum and sleazebags are so full of themselves and think themselves noble, honorable, brilliant, and amazing. Those obsessed with privilege, status, and power tend to be narcissistic by nature. Also, they conflate meritocracy & credentials with morality & credence. Because they went to fancy schools and got fancy degrees and rubbed shoulders with 'respectable' peoples around the world, they think they are the best of the best. And because they often wield power above the law, they feel as if they’re imbued with divine powers of higher wisdom and understanding. So, while the rest of us should be judged by the law, they are above the law because they are so... special. Just like the hands of gods can’t be hampered by the laws of mortals, the power of the Deep State cannot be hamstrung by the banal laws of the hoi polloi, the ‘little people’. While such a view might be deemed as arrogant and corrupt, those in the Deep State believe it is their duty to be above the law because their role is SO VERY IMPORTANT. So, they tell themselves that they must bend and twist the law for a ‘higher loyalty’.
Also, there is the mostly compliant and complementary media that works with the Deep State. And there are think-tanks and the academia made up of pretty much the same kind of people, and they are all into "If you scratch my back, I will scratch your back." So, even though most people in the Deep State are really shallow, venal, and vile goons, there is a vast cottage industry to shower them with praises and prizes. Sometimes, it can be downright ridiculous, as when Obama awarded Joe Biden with the Medal of Freedom. Imagine that, the president giving the vice-president the award.
Perhaps, there might be more of a balance IF both parties were equally represented in the deeply entrenched institutions of Washington D.C., but the fact is the DC and the Deep State are now an almost entirely a one-party system where most people are into clone-think, worshiping the same icons and idols. Notice that Pompeo in the Senate questioning was asked about his views on ‘gay marriage’. Homomania is sacrosanct in all areas of the Deep State because the Jewish top dogs made it so. Because Homomania is considered sacred, it is easy for any sleazebag in the Deep State to signal that he too is part of the holy crowd. He needs only to wave the homo flag. Or spout off platitudes about ‘diversity’ and ‘inclusion’ or yammer something about how they are inspired by MLK and etc.

So, the system is rigged not only to favor the talented-and-unscrupulous but also to make the unscrupulous feel that they are moral paragons and agents on the side of angels. Without such manipulative psycho-mechanisms, members of the Deep State will just feel utter cynicism as gangsters, crooks, and liars. Such people cannot maintain morale for long.
So, the secret of the Deep State is to attract those without scruples but to make them feel that they are the most scrupulous. We see these traits in sleazebags like John Brennan and James Comey. Both are hollow men, empty suits when it comes to principles. They are pathological liars and crooks who will pull anything to serve the interest of the Deep State. BUT they sincerely believe themselves to be on the side of angels BECAUSE the system showers praise on those who stick with the Official Narrative and Sacred Cows of the Current Year.
People like Edward Snowden cannot go very far in the System because they have too much of a conscience. Comey may claim to have a ‘higher loyalty’, but it really means his loyalty is to the Deep State. In contrast, Snowden had a deeper loyalty to an idea of justice. He spilled the beans on the Deep State and, as such, paid a huge price. The system praises the Comeys and McCabes of the world while trying to destroy people like Julian Assange and Edward Snowden who see the need for transparency in the Deep State of the lone superpower that, since the Cold War, has grown ever more arrogant, aggressive, and demented.

It is the logic of power. Power wants those of ability who will serve the system loyally. Power wants technocrats and commissars than truth-seekers and idealists. But the Power also needs to maintain the morale(if not true morality) of its servants by making them feel that they are on the right side of history.
It was the same in communist nations. The system obviously wanted yes-men and sycophants who would never ask too many questions. But the goons also had to be convinced that they were the most virtuous because, without such conceit, they might just grow awfully cynical and operate only as gangsters. The system wants dogs that believe in the nobility of service to the master.

This isn’t easy to do because the Power(of whatever nation or ideology) is always corrupt, compromised, and dirty. It is very difficult to get close to power and keep one’s principles. It may be that idealists hope to gain power to do good, but by the time they’ve come close to power, they’ve become the dirty Power. Imagine a Broom that is to be used to clean up society. But to get to the Broom, one has to wade through all the filth. By the time one finally gets to the center to wield the broom, one is as dirty as the former holders of the broom. And there is the realization that the broom itself is so dirty that using it will only spread than clean the filth.
This is how the Boomer generation idealists all turned out. It’s a sad story really. Those who loathed Richard Nixon became worse than Nixon. And their main reason for going after Donald Trump, no saint himself, is because Trump, despite his own sleaziness and filth, poses a threat to the ways of the Deep State, for which Hillary was like the Queen Bee to protect and serve. To the Deep State drones, Trump is like a bear that messes up the Deep State honeycombs. Trump’s victory sent out a massive signal among the drones to bring back Hillary and kill Trump. So, he’s been stung from many sectors of the Deep State.

Because the Power is so corrupt and compromised, the most effective means by which it instills drones with a sense of righteousness and holiness is by promoting symbolic morality, which is so much easier than real morality. Symbolic morality is characterized by icons, idols, mantras, rites, and rituals.
It was always easier to be a symbolic Christian than a real Christian. A real Christian had to seriously regard the teachings of Jesus, examine one’s own failings, sincerely seek redemption, and seek personal salvation in the eyes of God. In contrast, a symbolic Christian merely needed to wear a Crucifix, hold a rosary, say a bunch of ‘Hail Mary’s, and attend certain services. Michael Corleone is no real Christian in THE GODFATHER, but he is a good symbolic Christian who donates generously to the Catholic Church and attends the ritual that makes him godfather to his sister’s child. Both the Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church came to favor symbolic Christianity over real Christianity, which found new hope with Protestantism, which, however, also succumbed to new concoctions of rituals and symbolism... or just grew tired because how can spiritual movement define itself as a ‘protest’ forever when it’s become so deeply entrenched in the Order and the Power.

Anyway, symbolism means never having to say you’re sorry. So, never mind if you were one of the Teutonic Knights in Russia or Crusaders in the Holy Land. Never mind all the brutality and violence you carried out. Never mind all the un- or anti-Christian acts you’ve committed. As long as you stick to symbolic Christianity, you can tell yourself that you carried out the will of God. After all, your battle shield had a sign of the Cross. And before charging into battle, you knelt and held your sword like a Cross and prayed to God. You might have even sung a hymn with other warriors. And after sacking the city and raping women and killing children, you may have offered a prayer to God in a Church. Thus, by making the symbolic gestures, you can feel blessed and righteous in your violence. And you can conveniently forget that so much of what you did went against REAL CHRISTIAN teachings.
This is why symbolism is so appealing. Consider the studio executive in HAIL CAESAR! by the Coen Brothers.

In many ways, he acts like a gangster and henchman. He is ruthless, cunning, and not above using bribes and blackmail to keep people silent. He’s about making the system run smoothly as possible. And yet, he feels himself to be a good man. Why? He goes to Church and make confessions before a priest. Of course, it’s about trivial stuff like his failure to stop smoking, but the rituals makes him feel as a man of God.

The Deep State is secular but paves over its gangsterism, corruption, and venality with its own version of Symbolic Morality. Gee, the New and Improved FBI must be noble because its agents must make a pledge to the MLK statue. James Comey thinks himself a goody-good man because he compares himself to the attorney in TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD. And he must be a goody-good man because Obama, the historic black president, showered him with praise. It’s all symbolism. Never mind Obama the real guy is a sleazebag who shilled for Jews to bail out Wall Street and to destroy nations hated by Jews or Israel. He has magical aura because of the symbolism of being the ‘clean cut black guy’ and the ‘historic first black president’. So, never mind what he really is. Just fixate on what he symbolizes. He’s supposed to represent the fulfillment of the Dream that was cut short by the death of JFK, Malcolm X, RFK, and MLK. He’s supposed to be all those things, with a touch of Sidney Poitier-ness. In reality, what was Obama but a punk? As president, what was his idea of moral progress? Worship of homos and trannies. And what was his foreign policy? The destruction of nations at the behest of Judeo-Nazis.
We’ve heard the counterculture mythology many times that the Vietnam War and the Cold War could have been averted IF John F. Kennedy, MLK, and RFK had not been killed by the evil Deep State. How ironic that Obama, the fulfillment of the Dream, started a ‘new cold war’ with Russia, spread wars all over the Middle East, pulled off a coup in Ukraine, and became a compliant favorite of the Deep State. But never mind all that. Just focus on the symbolism.

The emptiness of symbolic morality can be seen in James Comey’s wife. She was a Hillary supporter and was so very angry over Hillary’s loss because she so badly wanted a ‘first woman president’. Again, it’s symbolic morality over real morality. Never mind what Hillary Clinton really did as Secretary of State. She acted like a gangster and did the bidding of the EOJ(the Empire of Judea) to destroy Libya and spread terror and war all over the Middle East. Millions of people had their lives destroyed as a result. Never mind her long history of corruption. Never mind her total lack of scruples. Never mind her arrogance, contempt, and vileness. The only thing that matters to Comey’s vapid, shallow, and disgusting wife is that Hillary would have been the ‘first woman president’. So, her symbolism trumps all other considerations.

This is how PC operates. It has no use for real morality or truth. Rather, it icon-izes or idolizes certain groups as magical, special, or deserving. So, if the military promotes a black woman to the rank of general, that must be good because of its symbolism. Never mind if she really deserved the title or if she, along with everyone else, is being used to fight immoral Wars for Israel. Or consider how we were supposed to praise Trump's decision to lob missiles into Syria in 2017 because a female naval officer was involved in the operation. PC symbolic morality. A feminist soldier pushed a button, so it must have been a blessed act.

Or, never mind how corrupt and sick the Deep State is. Hey, it appointed some holy homo to some important position. It is a game played by both sides. So, the vile GOP goes for the symbolic morality of being the best friend of Israel. Since Jews are supposedly the Holy Holocaust People and Israel is the Holy Land promised to Jews, the GOP is supposedly righteous and moral whenever it is associated with the symbolism of Jewishness. When morality shifts from a matter of personal responsibility and individual conscience to rites and rituals of symbolic signaling, society becomes as corrupt as when the Catholic Church was selling ‘indulgences’. Once sin was altered from a reality to a ‘symbol’, it could be bought and sold, like commodities in a stock market. (It is all the more dangerous today because the most powerful group in the US, the Jews, cannot be touched. In contrast, while past Wasp elites held much pride and prestige, they were not seen as holy, and therefore, it was fair game to notice their power and call foul on it. This had a restraining and reforming effect. But try to speak truth to Jews, blacks, and Homos. It'd be like sacrilege since they are the Holy Three.)

James Comey is a sleazebag but thinks himself so holy-shmoly because the ‘historic black president’ anointed him. And his wife thinks she’s such a noble person because she so passionately wanted a ‘first woman president’. Never mind that they are preening and privileged members of a vile, venal, mendacious, and murderous community that concocts policies to turn the world upside down at the behest of Judeo-Nazis and soulless corporations, the bottom line of which is more profits-at-any-cost. As long as they got the Proper Symbolism, they don't care. They think they own goody-goodness.

We have a pretty effective way of meritocracy. Despite the problems of Affirmative Action, for the most part the System does a pretty effective job of selecting and pooling the best in talent. But it has done an atrocious job of favoring the ethical-talented over unethical-talented. If anything, the Power tends to push away anyone with any integrity, honesty, and true morality based on facts. Political Correctness or PC has made this problem much worse. Though ostensibly an agent of justice, its dogmatic formula of predetermined Right and Wrong means that everyone just stick to the script, not unlike in Communist systems where people could not question the ‘scientific’ and ‘moral’ infallibility of Marxism-Leninism itself.
PC makes it very difficult for anyone in the academia, media, and government to speak honestly about Jewish Power, black pathology & crime, homo degeneracy, and female hysteria. PC morality is essentially symbolism-centered around icon-ized identities of holy victimhood. So, Jews are eternal victims of Holocaust. Blacks are sacred victims of slavery, and MLK is bigger than God and Jesus. Homos are angels, and if you say otherwise, you are a ‘homophobe’. And women, especially white women, are eternal victims of Evil White Men like Haven Monahan and must be protected from evil white men by... noble black man. ROTFL.

Reality is very different from the Sacro-Narrative and the Grand Delusion, but the power of symbolism can be such that it makes people hallucinate False Realities. Consider the symbolic power of the TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD narrative. America has changed so much since the 1950s, but we are still supposed to believe that redemptive white folks must do something to save poor helpless Negroes from the KKK lynchmob. While we live in the reality of the 21st century when so many white folks are suffering and being physically attacked by blacks, our sense of reality comes from Jewish-controlled TV and movies that define hyper-reality for us. Also, the False Reality of TV trespasses into our living room and smuggles PC symbolism into our brains while robbing us of our critical faculties, especially as TV shows rely as much on manipulative use of music and other visceral effects.

Thus, we have a world where meritocracy is rewarded ONLY IF it is without integrity. Consider journalism. What is the chance of anyone being hired IF he were to raise truly provocative questions about what is really going on? To work in journalism, one has to adhere to the PC rules of the Holy Three: Jews, Negroes, and Homos. (Women are holy ONLY IF they can be construed as victims of the Evil White Male, the Haven Monahans of the World.) The fact that David Reich had to close his book on DNA and racial differences with so much PC tripe goes to show that daring to speak the truth is like walking through a minefield. One wrong word, and you can be blown away and ruined forever.
This is really an immoral war on truth and liberty, but PC is seen as moral because of its symbolism. Once certain groups have been ‘sacralized’, facts and reason no longer matter. They are forever haloed in association with a certain event or condition in past history. So, Jews are Holocaust People no matter what they do. Even a black thug-rapist is a Holy Slave person. Even ‘hate hoaxes’ aren’t so bad IF in the service of spreading the message about the Holy Three. It’s like the Catholic Church wink-wink tolerated all those phony ‘miracles’ on grounds that they boosted hope among the faithful. 'Hate Hoaxes' might as well be called 'hate miracles'.

PC is really a form of virtue-vanity and, as such, is about empty calories. Indeed, fake virtue is worse than no virtue because it lulls us into thinking we do have virtue. But look at the modern world remade by the false virtue of PC. There is moral and cultural cancer all around resulting from the radical and mindless worship of everything Jewish, black, or homo OR with anything associated with nonsensical sanctimony about ‘diversity’ and ‘inclusion’, which in reality, comes down to the crazy notion that all nations except Israel should welcome Invasion and Replacement by hordes of foreigners who come to leech off the wealth. Unless we can create a New Reality that combines meritocracy of ability with ‘ethicracy’ of truth and reason(backed up by courage and spine), there is no hope for the future.