Sunday, June 28, 2020

J-WOW or Jewish War on White is behind the Arson of the West — Without Naming Jewish Supremacist Power as the Cancer Afflicting the White Race, there is No Hope — Complex History vs Cartoon History — Triversity over Diversity

What is to be done?

Push back against the main enemy. Jewish Supremacist Power or JSP.

This latest fiasco sweeping across the US and even EU is more of the same old Jewish War on White or J-WOW.

Naturally then, the most sensible thing is for whites to seek White Emancipation or White Liberation from Jewish Supremacism. A call for White Liberation from Jewish Supremacism will be most effective in dispelling the myth of 'White Privilege'. If people scoff and ask, "White Liberation? What do whites gotta be liberated from?", one need only say, "From Jewish Supremacist Power that makes white people fight Wars for Israel, makes white people support Zionist 'genocide' of Palestinians, makes white people cheer on the Jewish War of Hatred against Syrians, Iranians, Russians, among others. White Liberation from Jewish Supremacist control of predatory financial looting. White Liberation from Jewish Supremacist promotion of degeneracy and decadence as the stuff of neo-spirituality. White Liberation from Jewish Supremacist encouragement of more Drugs on the populace, which by the way, led to mass white deaths. White Lives Matter, and no white life is 'white trash'."

The problem began when whites didn't only cede power but moral(and even spiritual) authority to Jews. It's one thing for power to go from one people to another. It happens all the time. And in a democracy, the power goes back and forth among various parties. But suppose one party not only cedes power to the other party but totally surrenders to it as the fount of all truth, wisdom, and nobility. In other words, the other party that now has total power cannot even be criticized. But suppose it gets even crazier than that. Suppose the other party that has the power and the moral authority cannot even be said to have the power. Even though the other party pretty much rules everything, it must be characterized as 'for the little guy and the underdog, a party of helpless victims in need of eternal protection and special sensitivity'. Suppose Tiny Tim becomes Titan Tom but we go on pretending he's tiny and timmy. This is why Jewish Power is so utterly toxic in the US(and West in general). Jewish Power is like a black hole. It wields immense power and force but cannot be seen. It sucks in the light that could illuminate it.

When white people, especially Anglo-American Christians, ruled America in the past, they were sometimes good, sometimes bad, but one always knew WHO held the power. Indeed, the so-called Wasps were proud of their power. And because everyone knew they had it, they could be criticized and corrected. They could be pushed back from within and without. Wasp reformers pushed for progress for a more just society. And non-Wasps, especially Jews, critiqued and often satirized the negative aspects of Wasp rule. Thus, white power was out in the open, and as such, could be analyzed, criticized, and reformed. Also, there was an element of self-criticism and magnanimity among Wasps. Sure, Anglo-Americans could play dirty like everyone else, but there is no denying that Anglos and Northern Europeans made the best and most law-abiding(and reformist) societies because of the cultural(and possibly racial) character of those peoples. (Compare them with the social orders created by Muslims, Hindus, Chinese, or Southern Europeans & Eastern Europeans. If some people were too hot-tempered & contentious to maintain a just and orderly society, others, especially the East Asians and Tacoans were too passive and subservient to challenge corruption and tyranny.)
Jews posed a special threat to the American Order because they were (1) smarter than Wasps, thereby on the up and up and (2) lacking in cultural character. While Jews drone on and on about Tikkun Olam, it's just self-serving BS, ethno-propaganda. After all, if Jews CARE so much about the well-being of humanity, why haven't they done anything about the Palestinian Problem? How could they blithely allow current Jewish Power to do what it's doing in Syria, Iran, and Libya? How could they cover up what Jewish globo-capital did to Russia in the 1990s? While non-Jewish minorities were also lacking in cultural character, they were less dangerous because they were either less intelligent & capable than Wasps or only equally intelligent. In contrast, Jews, being smarter by one standard deviation than whites, could rise above them. Also, being pushy and crypto-supremacist in outlook, they were going for the jugular in the American power game. Now, if Jews had cultural character, maybe they would have made decent and even better elites. But being devious and vicious like Alan Dershowitz(and he's not the worst of them as there's even bigger scum like Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler), they want all the power and all the moral authority without any accountability and responsibility. Indeed, look what Jews have made of the Shoah. A genuine tragedy, it's been turned into shameless shoah-business.

Power is always dangerous but not so much when it's out in the open for examination and criticism. Adolf Hitler and Josef Stalin would have been far less dangerous if they could have been publicly scrutinized. Also, power shouldn't be synonymous with moral authority. Power is only as good as it behaves. This is how democracy works. People get sick of Party A and hang their hopes on Party B. If Party B messes up, the people go back to Party A or go with Party C. So, the power has moral authority only as long as it delivers. It doesn't get to have the power and authority just because it is what it is. But that is the state of affairs with Jewish control of the US. With Wasps, we could see the good and the bad. We could look back on Wasp history and see the triumphs, the tragedies, the evils. But with Jews, we must pretend they don't have the power when they control just about everything. We must pretend Jewishness = moral authority from the beginning of time to the end of time. We must pretend everything about Jews and Jewishness is the noblest thing. Even when it's clear that Jews have wronged Palestinians, all we hear from US politicians and elites is 'Muh Israel'. Meanwhile, there is ZERO sympathy or even acknowledgement for the countless victims of Jewish-Zionist globalist supremacism in Russia, Middle East, and around the world. That vile harridan Madeleine Albright, the murderess of countless Arab children, is still given the podium to pontificate about the dangers of 'fascism'. The vile Cass Sunstein, the ardent Zionist and pro-Deep-State war-monger, sounds the alarm on the coming of 'fascism' to America. Jewish Control of the US has led to Wars for Israel that have destroyed so many lives. Jewish Power acts like Judeo-Nazis, but what do we get from TV shows? Stuff like NAZI-HUNTERS and PLOT AGAINST AMERICA.

These are truly a shameless and awful people. These people who've done most to defame the white race and desecrate white monuments(via their proxies, of course) are the ones who are most revered by idiot whites. That being the case, whites DESERVE all the horrors awaiting them as monumental stupidity can't be helped. But then, in many ways, white cuckery to Jews is more the product of white elite cravenness than stupidity. Surely, many white elites KNOW who has the real power. To keep their own status and privilege, they must suck up to Jews. And since white elites serve as the brains of the white masses, their attitude serves as the template for the rest of the white population. Look how GOP's cucking to globo-homo-mania has led to so many white 'conservative' normies, even Evangelicals, embracing Lady Maga and other lunacies. Even Orthodox Christians are over 50% for 'gay marriage'. But Jewish Power, so immense in media and mass entertainment, not only control white masses through the elites but through Hollywood, advertising, and propaganda. Why are so many white youths even from working class and lower middle class backgrounds joining Antifa or marching down streets chanting Black Lives Matter? What were their formative influences? Endless TV ads showing blacks radiating with wisdom while whites are shallow shits. So many movies like 12 YEARS A SLAVE, DJANGO UNCHAINED, THE HELP, GREEN BOOK, SHAPE OF WATER, SELMA, BLACK PANTHER, and so on and so on. Meanwhile, the worst villains and vermin are whites, even more so than the 'Muslim Terrorists'. Most people are pretty shallow, dumb, or childish, and of course, most white idiots who have TV, movies, pop music, and advertising for their MAIN CULTURE will be mentally molded by Jewish Media Monopoly.
Now, certain works about the black tragic past are warranted. After all, there is a dark side to US history. But even an art film like 12 YEARS A SLAVE is suspect in the larger context because Hollywood's moral conscience and outrage are so selective and tribalistically distorted. Indeed, if Jews really care about the truth and justice for all, why hasn't there been a single movie about the horrors faced by whites in South Africa? Why not a single movie about Nakba and the plight of Palestinians? Why not a movie about the Jewish role in Communism and the deaths of millions in the Great Famine? Or the turbo-gangster-capitalist rape of Russia in the 90s? Or how about USS Liberty? 12 YEARS A SLAVE was produced by Arnon Milchan, the arch-Zionist who is totally okay with Jim Crowitz in the West Bank. He once worked to steal US nuclear material and then negotiated with Apartheid South Africa. Yet, THIS JEW dares to lecture whites on the evils of their 'racist' past. Okay, there were evils in White History, but where are the movies about evils of Jewish History? Or about black brutality that has taken so many lives in American Life? Or how Israel supports ISIS terrorists in Syria? This is why Jewish Moralism works in bad faith, indeed worst faith. It's not true morality where the rules apply to all but cheap(but effective) weaponized moralism meant to increase Jewish Power at the expense of others. If White Christians have some degree of guilt-conscience about the Other, it appears the core of Jewish Power has no such consciousness. It's really merchant-morality where Jews invoke the shackles to collect more shekels.
Jews have not only poisoned the minds of so many white youths but those of blacks as well. Now, blacks were bound to be problematic due to genetics. They evolved to be tougher, wilder, more muscular, and more aggressive. The very hunter-warrior traits that were generally weeded out among most other races were favored in black evolution. Also, hot Africa favored lean muscle and impulsiveness. In contrast, the northern savages, such as Eskimos, American Indians, and the Lapps, developed more fatty tissues and even temperaments during long cold months. As for Australian Aborigines, they evolved alongside kangaroos and wombats, animals less dangerous than lions, hyenas, cape buffaloes, hippos, rhinos, elephants, and other beasts that just couldn't stand the Negroes and tried to stomp them out, which made blacks run faster and jump higher. So, blacks would have been problematic regardless.
But Jews, with their control of media and academia, emphasized Negro Nobility and White Culpability. The new Narrative made far less sense than the old one. The Anglo-American Narrative on the Negroes was more judicious. Yes, slavery went against American Principles, blacks toiled on the farms, and the suffering of blacks must be recognized and addressed. That said, blacks did make great strides in the US compared to what they'd been in the Dark Continent: spear-chucking savages beating on bongo drums and driving hippos crazy. Under whites, blacks adopted a great religion, learned work ethic & civilized behavior, gained access to modernizing amenities. Also, blacks gained higher morality. Indeed, even when black Americans argued against oppression and for liberty, they were using the white man's values. By African 'values', there was nothing wrong with slavery. The Bantu Way was "if you kick the ass, you keep the ass." That was it. If Frederick Douglas had decolonized his mind of white influence and thought like a black African, he would have thought, "Sheeeeeeiiiiit, dem honkeys deserve to rule over us ni**ers cuz they's badass and gots da power." So, the Anglo-American view of blacks in America was balanced. Whites had clearly done wrong to practice slavery in the US and sometimes treated blacks in terrible ways, but blacks did go from savagery to some semblance of civilization in the New World under whites. But then, Jewish Power pushed the Narrative where whites were totally wrong and blacks were pure as snow. And even though the number of lynchings of blacks(most of them thugs and criminals) wasn't all that high throughout US history, Jews created the myth that just about every other Negro was hanging on a rope from a tree. Lynchings became Lynchocaust. But compare lynchings of blacks in the US with violence around the world, and they hardly qualify as among the greatest horrors in human history. In many parts of the world, many more people died in one year or even a single month than all the blacks killed by lynching in all of US history. Indeed, Jews have killed more Palestinians since 1948 than whites killed blacks with lynching. And how many Arabs/Muslims died as the result of Zionist-led sanctions on nations like Iraq, Syria, and Iran? Too many to count.
Jews have pushed a cartoon history were the Confederacy was merely about slavery. But it was much more, as any society is about much more than its economic institution. Back then, the Confederacy wasn't merely defending the slave system but their own kind of civilization and way of life distinct from those in the North. Besides, the real catalyst for the Civil War was more 'genocide' than slavery. It was westward expansion(that led to massacres of American Indians) that pushed the slavery issue to the front. As the North added another more state, the South insisted on adding another as well to balance things out. It was Manifest Destiny and destruction of the American Indians(in which the North was even more involved than the South) that made the slavery issue more contentious. But notice how we almost never hear anything about that. Characterizing the Confederacy as nothing-but-slavery is utterly disingenuous. In truth, every social order, every civilization, has sought to defend itself despite its problems of oppression or 'human rights'. American Indians were savages and practiced all sorts of horrors, but we honor their fight against the white man because they were trying to preserve their way of life, the only one they knew. True, Indians had slavery and some of them even practiced cannibalism and sadistic torture, but they had a culture of their own. When the West arrived on Japanese shores, the West was bringing lots of progress, but the Japanese still resisted and tried to maintain their independence. Should we boil it all down to 'Jappers were trying to maintain an oppressive caste system and slavery of the peasants?' When the French invaded Russia, it's true they were coming with more advanced ideas about liberty and dignity of man, but was it wrong for Russia to resist and fight back? Would it make sense to characterize the Russian defense of the motherland as merely 'trying to preserve serfdom'? Only a puritanical moralistic fool thinks like that. Even when a civilization practices slavery or things we may disapprove of, it is MUCH MORE than that single institution.

And even though the KKK degenerated into a kind of nihilism, it arose to defend whites from blacks who'd been encouraged by Northerners to act up. To merely call it 'terrorist' is hilarious coming from Jews who created Israel through use of much terror. Surely, Jews know of Irgun. Indeed, Jews revolutionized the modern use of terror as Bolsheviks and Zionists. And Jews have no problem aiding terrorism all across the Middle East to make Arabs fight Arabs, make Muslims fight Muslims. And speaking of terror, what of US military in WWII? Weren't the willful mass-bombings of civilian targets in Germany and Japan a form of mass terror? A single such bombing killed more innocent civilians than all the killings done by the KKK. And what are sanctions but a form of terror-by-disease-and-starvation? This isn't to defend the KKK, which became a sinister outfit, but it is hardly unique in having used terror to gain certain objectives. And today, blacks are even worse. Their riots, lootings, rampages, random attacks on whites, arson, and etc. are all forms of racial terror meant make others cower to their neo-savage demands. In some respects, blackkk rampage is worse than KKK violence. Whites in hoods, though violent, were trying to maintain or restore order. Black rioters and looters, in contrast, are using terror to spread disorder and mayhem as the New Normal of America. Also, KKK was closer to the truth than BLM is. It's been true that blacks are a natural threat to whites because they are more aggressive and tougher. In contrast, BLM is based on the utter BS that countless innocent blacks are being mowed down by the white police. If the KKK over-reacted to the grim truth of black thuggery, BLM lunatics are basing their actions on utter fantasy. The truth is black lives are killed by black lives, which also kill non-black lives all across America.

With American Indians, there is a more nuanced and complicated understanding. Yes, no one would deny that American Indians were proud peoples(though bloody savages as well) with deep and rich roots in the American Land. And there was real tragedy in their defeat at the hands of whites. It was especially tragic as most subject peoples of white colonization regained control over their lands. With American Indians, this became impossible as they weren't too many in number to begin with, too many were wiped out by diseases, and the mass-immigration from the Old World never ended. So, there is that tragic side to American Indian History. But there is also the other side of America, that a great rich and free nation was founded on where there had been only wilderness and Red Savagery. And in time, even American Indians benefited from the New Order. So, we can see both the tragedy and triumph of the American Indian narrative.
And such a narrative used to prevail with blacks as well. Both Northern and Southern scholars acknowledged how blacks had gained as well as lost in their American experience. But why is there still a nuanced perspective on the story of American Indians(even though they suffered 'genocide', far graver than slavery) while no such exists with blacks? For one thing, Jews gained too much from immigration to associate mass immigration with imperialist invasion that led to the great replacement of natives, especially because they pulled something similar with the Palestinians. But the main reason why Jews have promoted the cult of the Noble Negro is that their supremacist rule over the West relies on white submission and white obedience, and THIS means making whites feel shame and guilty about their own identity and interests. NO UPPITY WHITES. Whites must have their heads bowed low. In Europe, Shoah Guilt was enough to cower people's heads over there, but in the US, it was the stuff about blacks. Jews also figured that blacks are especially useful in this because whites will tend to feel most guilty about whom they look up to as 'cool', 'awesome', and 'superior'. Whites may feel bad about all those dead Vietnamese, Central Americans(killed by US-backed right-wing death squads), and Arabs, but they are, visibly at least, mediocre peoples, and whites can't get to excited over them. But whites were bound to feel a special guilt regarding blacks, the race of athletes, studs, orators, singers, and etc. And so, there could be no nuance or complexity about white-black relations. Whites could not say something sensible like, "Hey, it's too bad that our ancestors whipped your kind and made them pick cotton, and I'm sorry if I ever said 'ni**ger', but you gotta admit you blacks were a bunch of jungle/savanna savages without written word, the wheel, higher spirituality & ethics, and it was through us white folks that you were elevated from savagery to civilization." And once upon a time, prominent blacks like Zora Neale Hurston and Booker T. Washington admitted as much. While harshly critical of the institution of slavery, they also realized that the Negro was uplifted from savagery thanks to contact with whites. But such nuance has been banned over the years. Blacks are all good and were living in Edenic paradise, and it was them evil 'racist' whites who ruined black utopia. Today, many fools, blacks and whites, think all of Africa would be one big Wakanda if not for white colonialism, which is ROTFL. Righteous Negro Pastor Manning speaks the truth:

With a more nuanced view of history, whites could correct their ways but so could blacks. But once the New Narrative became Black Angel and White Devil — oddly similar to one pushed by Black Muslims, albeit with Jews included among the White Devils — , whites were responsible for everything while blacks were responsible for nothing. Even when blacks failed, the blame wasn't on them. Rather, it was said whites failed them. So, if black students failed, they didn't fail on their own, but white society failed them. If blacks rioted and looted, they were acting in the name of vigilante justice because whites failed them in justice. George Floyd likely died more from drugs than the police restraint, but never mind his criminality and pathology and just blame the white knee... and white everything. Is it any wonder that we now live in a nation where blacks rampage around like animals but are revered as angels? Blacks murder each other, but the narrative is 'whites must stop killing blacks'. Never mind many more whites are killed by blacks in any given year. When one side is totally right no matter what while the other side is totally wrong no matter what, it's not politics or morality but a demented form of theology. It's like gods are right no matter what they do because they are gods and therefore must be appeased by humans, even if gods cause terror on mankind. Nothing good can come out of this Negrocracy or Afrocracy, but Jews pushed it as effective weapon against white identity.
But then, Jews enjoy the same kind of 'spiritual' nihilism for themselves over whites. No matter what Jews do, they are right. If Jews got too much power and privilege, it must be blamed on whites as 'white privilege'. Jews can use media to criticize, condemn, and lambaste White Christians, Russians, Iranians, Chinese, Turks, French, Germans, Anglos, and etc., but no matter what Jews do — spread wars, financially loot the world, mess with elections, spread degeneracy, promote drug culture, and etc. — , you better NOT name the JEW in the abuse of power, corruption, and decrepitude. Even now, many in the US don't know that it was the Jewish oligarchs who raped Russia in the 1990s. (Indeed, even Russian leaders are afraid of speaking this truth.) Even now, most Americans don't know that these crazy wars were essentially Wars for Israel.
This is why Jewish Power is infinitely more dangerous than Anglo-American power of old. Wasps could be jerks, a**holes, stinkers, and lowlifes, but you could call out on them. And many groups did. Jews, Italian-Americans, Irish-Americans, black-Americans, and etc. all called out on Wasp Power and, as such, pressured Wasps to mend their ways. But with Jews, it's impossible. It may partly be because Jews feel more anxiety and paranoia as a minority elite, but it's also a matter of personality. Jerry Nadler is a rather typical personality type among Jews. You see it in Abe Foxman and Neumann(on SEINFELD) as well. It's a vileness, viciousness, mendacity, and obnoxiousness beyond human imagination. All combined with utter shamelessness, the kind that led Ron Jeremy to suck his own dic*.

You see this personality type in Sarah Silverman and Howard Stern as well, but at least certain Jewish comedians, like Don Rickles, had the saving grace of brazen Jewish irascibility, which at least dropped all inhibitions and said it like it is, as with Mel Brooks. But when Jews like Nadler go into moralistic mode, it is beyond repulsive because they lack the requisite character for speaking about truth and justice. Howard Stern being trashy and vulgar in his shamelessness is one thing, but when loathsome Jews like Anthony Weiner, Jerry Nadler, and Adam Schiff pretend to be the moral arbiters of US politics, it's total pukesville, all the more so because they have no qualms about promoting Jewish Supremacist wars all over the Middle East.

So, it's about time to expose the real power behind the Wizard of Globoz. It's Jewish Power. All these Antifa and BLM riots are part of the Jewish War on White. Now, most Antifa and BLM clowns surely don't know that they are tools of Jewish Power. They really believe they are on the right side of history. But who made them feel such cartoonish emotions that reduces the world into a comic book of heroes and villains, angels and demons? Who financed stuff like GREEN BOOK and other movies that ONLY focus on white moral failings or white bigotry while presenting blacks as the flawless breed? Who were behind PC education that sanctified Jews, blacks, and homos as angels while whites were scapegoated for all that is wrong? Who funds groups like Antifa and provides lawfare to free them after new rounds of vandalism? Who controls the media that gives gushing coverage to BLM mayhem and Antifa thuggery? Who created all those TV shows and devised public education that made so many whites into sappy, silly, and stupid cucks who kneel at the feet of Negro thugs and cheer on Antifa vandals & hoodlums? Who pushed Russia Collusion Hoax? Sure, Deep State did it, but who gave the go-ahead? And regardless of how serious Covid is or isn't, who politicized it to shut down the whole economy to bring down Donald Trump and to send a message to the whole nation, "If you re-elect Trump, we will mess up the economy for all of you!!"? It's JSP or Jewish Supremacist Power. (Indeed, if Hillary were president, all these panics and hysteria would have been kept under lid by Jewish Power. Though Trump is a shill of Zion, the mere perception of him as a tough-talking white guy with balls has been sufficient for Jews to smear him and humiliate him to send a loud-and-clear message that whites deserve no identity and must only kneel as cucky-wucks. Once again, Trump was caught in a vice. If he took hard action, he would be blasted as a 'fascist tyrant' by the deep state and Jewish-run Media. If he did little or nothing, he would look weak and his tough-guy exterior would be exposed for its utter hollowness.)
Trace the puppet-strings to the puppet-master, and this is yet another Jewish War on White. But idiot white MAGA-tards will cheer Trump as he declares West Bank as part of Israel. Jewish Power defames and destroys whites, but whites just can't cuck enough before the holy holocaust Judeo-Nazis. Indeed, what is the #1 rule of American Politics? Thou Shalt Not Offend Jews. Why did GOP cuck to 'gay marriage'? Main reason was it was afraid to offend Jews who wanted it. Why haven't Trump and Barr taken serious measures against Big Tech monopoly and Antifa thuggery? Because Jews would be very displeased.
Incredibly, Jews who practice apartheid and enforce Jim Crowitz policies in West Bank are lecturing White Southerners about the evils of 'racism' and the bad ole Jim Crow days. Even as Neocons call for the erasure of Southern Heritage, they call on Southern Whites to support Zionist tyranny over Palestinians. The truly sickening thing is whites fall for this Every Single Time.

If in recent years, blacks have reason to be pissed, it's because globalists pushed mass immigration that led to more competitive pressures on blacks. Also, it was urban 'liberal' Democrats and their homo allies who spearheaded gentrification that removed many blacks from big cities. And if blacks got incarcerated at higher numbers, it was because the New Democrats under Bill Clinton decided to get tough on crime. And in overwhelmingly 'liberal' cities like NY, the voters elected Rudy Giuliani twice and Michael Bloomberg three times to bring down crime, mostly black. And Jews also used globo-homo to push black issues to the back of the bus. And US police was trained with Israeli strong-arm tactics under the auspices of ADL and other Jewish groups. And it was the Jewish-run music industry that promoted and spread gangsta rap that encouraged blacks to murder each other. But now, these Jews and so-called 'progressives' try to pin all the racial problems regarding blacks on Trump and his voters. And so many whites are so cucked that they fall for this slime tactic and get on their knees. It's beyond pathetic. And it goes to show that Jewish Power is utterly shameless in its sham moral pornographics to push any narrative, no matter how false and ludicrous, to get what it wants.

Unless whites call for White Liberation from Jewish Supremacism and side with Palestinians and wave the Palestinian Flag(if Confederate Flag is banned), they have no hope. Whites can bitch about Antifa, BLM, crime, and diversity, but if they don't Name the Jew, it'd be like a cancer patient and his doctor discussing all the symptoms of cancer without ever naming the cancer. Such a doctor is useless, and such a patient is sure to die. If there's a dead rat stinking up the house, find the decaying rat. No amount of removing objects from the house will deal with the smell. And air sprays and opening the windows will only be temporary fixes. You must find the dead rotting rat.

Also, anyone who still uses the term 'racist' as an epithet is part of the problem. It doesn't matter how 'based' you are. Using the term 'racist' to mean the worst of all evils is to give into the terms of the enemy. The fact is Ism means belief, and race + ism should mean belief in the reality of race and racial differences. Thus, yes, America is race-ist because races exist and the races are different. Blacks do what they do because they are more muscular and more aggressive. That is a race-ist truth, and it has to be addressed honestly. Against lies, only truth is the real weapon.


In a way, the current lunacy has blown the Cult of Diversity out of the water.We’ve been told on and on about the wonders of Diversity, but most groups in the US don’t matter. Blacks and Antifa have harmed so many groups, but there is total silence about their plight from both 'left' and 'right'.

In the US, only Jews, blacks, and homo matter. PC is really about Tri-versity than Diversity.
It’s been said the US has so many ethnic and national groups who should be appreciated and celebrated, but no one cares about them. They are all just extras, backdrop, or at best supporting actors in the National Drama hogged by Jews, blacks, and homos. But then, why shouldn't it be so? After all, what is post-war Americanism but an amnesia-ism(with no memory of ‘boring’ histories and cultures) and idol-worship of winners and contempt for losers. Such is the logic of late-stage consumer-capitalism. Sure, there’s the usual rigamarole about equal opportunity, but the dog-eat-dog competition produces just a handful of big winners. Jews win in finance, verbal IQ, and high tech. Homos win in fashion and celebrity. Blacks win in sports and pop music.
And so, according to the logic of Cultural Capitalism, only those three winner-groups matter, and the rest are just backdrop. Whites do win in the beauty department, but as whites are denied identity and autonomy, white beauty is now seen as a commodity that belongs to others. In other words, white women belong to Jewish men and Negro men, and white guys belong to immigrant women of all stripes. The idea of whiteness belonging to whites is anathema. (Still, it’s weird that in a world that denies whiteness as an identity and quality, most peoples everywhere still notice whiteness as most appealing and gravitate toward it via immigration or fantasy.)

So, it’s time to talk of the Triversity than Diversity. Here’s some proof. This Iranian man’s livelihood has been destroyed, but no one cares. Why should they? He’s part of Diversity, not Triversity(of Jews, homos, and blacks).

Saturday, June 27, 2020

Notes on Susan Sontag's Infamous Statement: "White Race Is the Cancer of Human History"

Susan Sontag wrote:

“If America is the culmination of Western white civilization, as everyone from the Left to the Right declares, then there must be something terribly wrong with Western white civilization. This is a painful truth; few of us want to go that far…. The truth is that Mozart, Pascal, Boolean algebra, Shakespeare, parliamentary government, baroque churches, Newton, the emancipation of women, Kant, Marx, Balanchine ballets, et al, don’t redeem what this particular civilization has wrought upon the world. The white race is the cancer of human history; it is the white race and it alone—its ideologies and inventions—which eradicates autonomous civilizations wherever it spreads, which has upset the ecological balance of the planet, which now threatens the very existence of life itself.”

Even though her views were extreme on this matter, she wrote this in genuine sympathy with the Third World. This was when the Vietnam War was raging and when the Non-West was seeking alternative paths to development. Also, even those on the Right may recognize a kernel of truth in Sontag's characterization of the Modern West. All this talk of 'growth and more growth' at the expense of all other considerations is a kind of cancer. After all, those on the Dissident Right are sick of 'muh growth' rhetoric of the globalists, libertarians, radical capitalists, and etc. GOP is only about GDP.

Sadly, where Sontag was wrong was that this cancer could spread from white nations to non-white ones as well.

it is the white race and it alone—its ideologies and inventions—which eradicates autonomous civilizations wherever it spreads

If only it were true. Today, non-whites have joined in globalism and are taking part in the destruction of all autonomous societies. Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea, under Western influence, have ended up with barren wombs and high suicide rates. They now welcome mass immigration. And Filipinos and others scramble to Japan and will demographically take over, and what had once been a unique Japanese people and culture will be lost. Hindus are all over the world taking part in globalism, from African cities to San Francisco to New York. Indeed, at this point, even if every white person were to suddenly vanish from the face of the earth, the cancer of globalism will likely spread and spread.

In a way, white 'racism' was a check on the white cancer. As long as whites offended others with supremacist attitudes, non-whites pushed against white power and influence. But then globalism came along, and the white empire was willing to welcome, extol, and promote non-whites to the highest ranks. White 'anti-racism' emboldened non-whites to join in the white-made globalist world order. (Indeed, it's likely Gandhi and others would have joined with the British Empire if it hadn't been 'racist' toward their ilk.) White 'racism' and Western nationalism posed as both the enemy and model for non-white nations. Against white 'racism', they needed their own racial identity as a weapon. And non-whites realized that the national system is most ideal for organizing modern societies. So, the struggle for 'national liberation' was also an enterprise in national formation. Some peoples, like the Vietnamese and Thais, already had a genuine sense of ethnicity, culture, and territoriality. Others, like the Indonesians and those in Middle East and especially much of Africa, had to work at creating new national identities. Still, as long as whites were in 'racist' and nationalist mode, non-whites felt compelled to emphasize their own racial-national identities as bulwark against the 'cancerous' Western Power(and, to be sure, rival non-white powers). Thus, the white cancer was limited to the white world. And maybe the New Order would have turned out poly-national after World War II. With the end of European empires, whites would have their world, and non-whites would have their own.
But the post-war story wasn't dominated by Western Europe, a fading power, but by the US and USSR that competed for Universalist Hegemony. Both were empires that claimed to be committed to 'anti-racism'. USSR was about communist brotherhood of man, comrades all around the world. US claimed to represent liberal democratic values and individual liberty applicable to all. As such, if European Empires had sought to dominate and exploit non-white colonies, US and USSR reached out with a vision of Enlightened Imperialism whereby non-whites would be treated as equals of whites. In some ways, this sounded good on paper, but it was one sure way to spread the white cancer as the white cancer cells were now willing to merge with brown cells IF the brown cells agreed to join with the white cancer.

While Sontag meant 'cancer' as damnation, there is a repressed awe of Western Civilization in her characterization. After all, cancer is no simple disease like a minor headache or sprained ankle. It isn't just a case of the flu or toothache that a dentist can fix. Cancer is a GREAT disease, an awesome disease. Until relatively recent times, it could not be cured. It started small but spread all throughout and led to sure death.

Sontag wrote:

The truth is that Mozart, Pascal, Boolean algebra, Shakespeare, parliamentary government, baroque churches, Newton, the emancipation of women, Kant, Marx, Balanchine ballets, et al, don’t redeem what this particular civilization has wrought upon the world.

Yet, the implication is that THOSE THINGS are part of the cancer. Indeed, what is the nature of cancer? It strives for total domination. It is obsessive, unrelenting, aggressive, expansive, maniacal, and totalizing. It must express itself to the fullest extent, and that means spreading all throughout the body EVEN IF it means death for the body. In one of her essays, Sontag associated sex with death. Sex(and orgasm), in its striving for the fullest sensuality and pleasure, takes the body to the furthest limit, beyond which lays death. It's no wonder Sontag had a special thing for Yukio Mishima who was also obsessed with sex and death. The boy who got his first orgasm staring at a picture of St. Sebastian shot full of arrows ultimately died in much the same way albeit with a blade. Cancer is like the Terminator. You can't bargain with it. It seeks total and ruthless domination, and nothing better stand in its way.
But that very mindset is at the heart of Mozart, Pascal, Shakespeare, Newton, Kant, Marx, Western Arts, Western Ideologies, and etc. Western Artists, more than those of other cultures, were most powerful in individuality, egoism, vanity, and even megalomania. Mozart did it his way, even truer of Beethoven and Wagner. Western scientists insisted on pushing further and further without end to get closer to the stars and atoms. Western explorers and discoverers searched further and further, even out into space. Western ideologies have sought to arrive at the ultimate truth, emancipate all of mankind or liberate every individual soul. Whether communism, capitalism, libertarianism, or feminism, they are about more liberation, more freedom, more justice, or the Permanent Revolution. So, even if one might find much that is good about them, they are essentially 'cancerous' in that they know of no limits. They must keep pushing further and further, even when it appears all possibilities have been exhausted.
However, the reason why the West became especially 'cancerous' was due to the stabilizing influence of Jewish Culture via Christianity. Western drive toward super-competitive excellence via individualism and universalism may have begun with the Greeks, but such extremes of ambition tend to burn themselves out. Thus, the West, like the Rest, went through cycles of rises and falls. Like the Tower of Babel, the pagan West rose high but fell to earth again. But then, Christianity came along and provided an emotional, moral, and spiritual gyroscope to Westernism. Christianity's powerful moralism emphasizing humility and devotion could be heavy and repressive, thereby suppressing individual expression and excellence, but it also had a stabilizing effect on the Western pagan drive for no-limit exploration, discovery, conquest, and experimentation(the biting into the Forbidden Fruits). It provided a humble heart to the egotism of pagan pride. Thus, a kind of balance was formed between the liberal will to explore and conservative desire to preserve.

Paradoxically, the Christian element that dampened the pagan spirit of individuality actually made the Western Light burn brighter in the long run. It's like an overly ambitious person may feel resentful about being told to get some rest, take it easy, spend time with family, and go on vacation. So obsessed with winning, he may want to work 24/7. And yet, that is a good way to burn out... as Alexander the Great did. But in being forced to balance his drive for excellence with some time set aside for peace of mind, his energy will actually last longer. It's like an athlete who plays too hard all the time won't last long in the ring or field. And Christianity, a religion originating from heretical Jews, provided a kind of balance to the highly aggressive Western pagan spirit for excellence. Many scholars see this Hebraic influence as having set back European advancement, and that is partly true. In the Muslim world, Islam did end up holding back progress. And Christianity in the Byzantium was too heavy and stifling of innovation and individuality. But in the Renaissance West, a balance was reached between hunger and humility. This way, instead of civilization as short bursts of sprints that soon peter out, the West set upon a long-term marathon of advancement with Christian humility serving as a stabilizing force to Pagan hunger. So, the West broke out of the cycles of rises and falls and embarked on a long journey of progress to more progress to more progress. (But in the post-Christian age, we are witnessing how the drive for more experimentation, more freedom, more power, and more wealth WITHOUT the stabilizing force of some great spiritual-moral counter-force is leading to the Great Fall. The Post-Christian West seems to intuit this danger on some level and grasps for new spiritual truths, but worship of the Super-Jew, Holy Homo, and Magic Negroes just doesn't cut it.)
It was that combination of Hellenistic drive and Hebraic spirit that made the West truly 'cancerous'. It led to endless rise and rise and more rise, and more expansion and more growth and etc. Though, as the story of Galileo tells us, the influence of religion often held back the power of reason, it also prevented the secular forces from growing too vain, arrogant, adventurous, impatient, and reckless. When religion mattered in the West, homo artists made the great works of the Renaissance. But in our time, homos just celebrate their degeneracy without shame, and such narcissism is promoted as the new spirit of the times. The moral rot from this in times to come will be incalculable. Generations raised with drag queen story hour. Churches festooned with sodomy-glorifying banners. Maybe, in some ways, this is a good thing in the long run. Maybe it is time for Western Civilization to fall to ruin and start again. Maybe the Hellenic-Hebraic cancer had a great long run, and now must end.
In a way, life itself is like a cancer. Like cancer, life seeks to grow and grow. Any organism is 'cancerous' in multiplying without limit to take over the whole world. But life could not be cancerous because organisms all balanced each other out. Countless plants and countless animals all canceled out one another. So, even if one organism wanted to take over everything, it couldn't as it was balanced by or depended on other organisms. The first truly cancerous organism arrived with mankind. (When rabbit population explodes and eats up the vegetation, rabbits begin to starve and nature restores the balance. When predators eat up most of the prey animals, they begin to starve and the natural balance is restored. But mankind, in creating agriculture and cattle-farming, could destroy/transform so much of nature yet still keep growing in numbers and power. They broke free of the natural balance, and then, the white race took it to the next step by means of uniting all the world under their hegemony.) When Sontag wrote her piece, she probably had no idea how destructive even primitive man was upon the Earth. Archaeologists now believe that the migration of prehistoric men led to the extinctions of most mammal species in all five continents. So, humans were cancerous before the arrival of the white race. But among the human races, the white race became the most cancerous of them all.
Again, by 'cancerous', it's as much a compliment as an epithet because cancer is a great awesome disease. While all human groups built empires and conquered and killed many — Huns, Aztecs, Mongols, Ottomans, etc — , it took the white race to finally conquer every piece of land on Earth, split the atom, and send men into space. While non-white races were also ruthless, aggressive, and cruel, their 'cancerousness' was limited. Mongols conquered so much but couldn't expand further and couldn't sustain their pace and then soon faded. Ottomans seemed to be on the verge of conquering and overtaking Christendom but reached their peak and then began the long decline. They remained locked in cycles of rises and falls experienced by most civilizations. (To be sure, the Muslim world, like the Christian world, experienced a long continuity due to the stabilizing power of the words of the Prophet. But Islam was bound to be more stifling of innovation and progress for one crucial reason. Whereas Christianity developed as a universal religion by dumping the narrow tribal laws of the Jews, Islam combined universalism with the local customs of Arabs & Judaic laws. Christianity dropped the particularity of culture and emphasized the universality of spirit whereas Islam attached Arab-Judaic customary particularism to a universalist creed. As such, there was too much cultural baggage in Islam for it to allow much in the way of creativity and innovation.)
When Sontag wrote her piece, the white world seemed distinct from the non-white world. Also, whites were clearly in control of the white world. Jews didn't control the US or Europe, though they were clearly influential. So, one could speak of the West vs the Rest. But over the yrs, whites cucked to Jews and even cucked to blacks. And whites now cuck to Diversity, or mass migration-invasion.
As such, it's no longer the case that whiteness is the cancer of humanity. It is no longer whiteness or white power or white ways that are threatening to control all the world. Rather, whiteness is now like a cuck-cancer bridge to Jewish cancer, black cancer, and homo cancer. Whites are now like the god Atlas. It is no longer the active god of the world but the supportive and servile god. White managerial shoulders now serve as the bridge of Jewish supremacist cancer that spreads wars, predatory capitalism, hegemonism, and genocides(especially against Arabs and Muslims). But under the control of Jews, white shoulders also serve as the bridge for non-white invasion of white lands. Billy Boy Clinton and Joe Biden welcome the browning of the West. Even Donald Trump who ran on border controls says he wants more legal immigration. Brexit led to shutting UK to other Europeans but welcomes more blacks and browns. On the bridge of white shoulders, the Jewish cancer spreads all over, and of course, Jews spread globo-homo cancer as their proxy disease all around the world. Jews figure homos in each nation will make the best collaborationist agents for Jews. And whiteness also serves as bridge for the spread of Afromaniacal cancer all over the world. Would there be blacks outside Africa if not for the white bridge? White folks used to spread white power around the world. Now whiteness as cuck-cancer spreads Jewish power, Negro might, and homo sickness around the world. What do Chinese boys worship most? Negroes in the NBA.
That is why, if whites cannot bring about white liberation from Jewish supremacism and black monstrosity, it would be better if the white race just vanished from Earth. In our times, whiteness is most dangerous not because of 'white supremacism' but because of white cuck-ism that helps to spread Jewish supremacism, black ghastliness, and homo degeneracy all around the world. Does the world really need to worship BLM and 'Muh Israel'? Does the world really need to be instructed by fruits and trannies whose main mode of being is tooty-toot-toot vanity?

Cancer isn't infectious, but it seems as though the white cancer came to submit, serve, and transmit the Jewish cancer, black cancer, and homo cancer as the hegemonic forces to every corner of the world. BLM protests even in Iceland? Huh? But then, with Hollywood as the new vatican, the new faiths are the Wonder Jew, Magic Negro, and Holy Homo.

Friday, June 26, 2020

Our is the Age of Deformation than Reformation — While Morality May be Protestantist, Culture Need be Catholicist — Conscience is Inherently Intolerant but Culture Is Ideally Tolerant

There was the Reformation. Now, there is the Deformation.

Reformation was often violent and bloody, but its core themes were God and holiness.
In contrast, the Deformation is vile and rotten to the core. It's about idolatry of the Negro, the most savage race, because he be best at basketball, rapping, and bumping-n-grinding. It's about celebration of homo-mania and tranny lunacy. It is about mandatory submission to Jews as the new master race and god-folks.

The Reformation believe in a Power and Truth above man. The current Deformation says the holy three of Negroes, homos, and Jews possess(indeed monopolize) the highest authority, and all of humanity must kneel, bow, and grovel before them. What about blacks committing the most crime and destroying entire societies? Never mind, 'black lives matter' and get on your knees. What about Jews in supremacist mode spreading wars, wrecking entire nations , looting entire economies, and spreading the culture of degeneracy? Never mind, just suck up to Jews as the eternal holy holocaust people and obey them... or else you're an 'anti-semite'. What about Homos being obsessed with vanity & narcissism and indulging in fecal-penetration and spreading disease while trannies are messed in the head and go for penis-cutting to get fake vaginas? Never mind, just celebrate all they do, and even drag your children to drag-queen story hours... or else you are a 'homophobe' or 'trannyphobe'.
And being a porny slut with tattoos and piercings(and green hair) is the new 'empowerment' for women.
An entire generation raised on demented violent video games, Tarantino gore-fests of sadism & nihilism(despite the recent partial redemption with ONCE UPON A TIME... IN HOLLYWOOD), retarded rap music, easily accessible porn even for kiddies & dick/vagina pic-'sexting' on smart phones, endless homo propaganda as the New Normal, vilification of whiteness as the new devil, ugly MMA filled with deranged lunatics with tattoos(made worse by female MMA slug-fests), erasure of heritage, and ends-justify-the-means nihilism(made worse by having ends that can never be met). In the case of Emma Sulkowicz, acting porny was the new puritanism. She actually made porn to make a 'moral' statement. And how fitting in our Deformed Age that George Floyd the junkie porn actor has been elevated as black moses-christ? But then, how surreal that the opportunistic sleazebag Donald Trump was embraced by so many as the nationalist hero. It's like we're living in a cartoon world.
The so-called new 'left' is about Negro Worship and Globo-Homo-mania or Queertianity financed by super-rich globalist capitalists. And why are Negroes and Homos favored over others? They found some of the biggest successes under capitalism. Blacks in sports and music, and homos in fashion and design. Classic Leftism, for all its problems, was humanist and saw value in all lives. The new 'left' pretends to be about justice, but its distorted and deformed notion of Truth rests on idolatrous capital valuation. Since Negros have value in sports/pop and homos have value in fashion/fanfare/pageantry, they matter more than other peoples. Palestinians, like 'white trash', mean nothing because they have little capital value. That is the new 'leftism'. It's no wonder that the proglodyte mobs don't attack Apple or Google headquarters. Or California agro-business for exploiting brown labor. As long as Big Capital wave the Noble Negro and Holy Homo banner, they have 'god on their side'.
Personally, I prefer Protestantism for conscience and Catholicism for culture. While the puritanical streak in Protestantism can be annoying(and even dangerous), the Protestant model is closer to true conscience because it's about individual agency and accountability in relation to God or the Truth. Instead of relying on the bureaucratic middleman and rigid dogma, you yourself need to peer into your own heart and make amends before God or Truth. On some level, one must be one's own priest.

But culturally, the Protestantist outlook can be destructive toward all that is deemed false or idolatrous. In seeking what is truly true, it has little tolerance for all that is deemed wicked, wrong, or deviant. It can lead to a cultural drabness. (Today, things are worse because the New Puritanism is in service to utter puerility. It is 'pueritanism'. Infantile idolatry of the trashy and trivial has the highest 'spiritual' value in our Deformist age. With Hollywood as the new vatican, is it any surprise that pop culture tropes and celebritism have become objects of highest reverence among the masses? And now that 'forever young' boomers are the old folks, we have childishness from old to young.)
On the cultural level, the Catholicist mindset is preferable, and one doesn't need to be a Catholic to cultivate and practice this approach. Catholicism found a compromise between the glories of paganism and the New Faith. It came to revere and preserve tradition in the arts and cultural expression EVEN WHEN those objects didn't conform to the spiritual ideals of the dominant Faith. Thus, it was multi-iconographic than iconoclastic in search of purity.
Martin Scorsese, in his two deeply personal documentaries about cinema — the American and the Italian — exhibited a Catholicist perspective on film history. They was criticality but also empathy and reverence. Sure, some of the past works may now seem 'racist' or were made under the Fascist regime, but they too are part of film history and should be studied, preserved, and appreciated. If certain narratives were overlooked or repressed in the past, the right way is to make new movies that address those matters than destroy old films. (In other words, don't burn all prints of Otto Preminger's EXODUS but makes some movies about Nakba from the Palestinian perspective.) After all, if puritanism takes hold in the cultural sphere, there is no end to the excuses for attacking, denouncing, and destroying just about anything. Also, puritanism can go into micro-purist mode, seeking out micro-aggressions even after macro-offenders have been banished. Iconoclasm can go into germ-freak mode. (PC is oddly quasi-fascist. Even though it denounces fascism as a kind of pornography of power devoid of classic idealism, PC sees everything in terms of Power and No Power. It is less interested in right and wrong than Power vs No Power. If your side has no power, then empowerment BY ANY MEANS is justified. It's no wonder Jews, homos, and blacks, along with feminists, have gotten so nihilistic. Jews no longer care about ideology. All that matters is More Jewish Power. Feminism used to side with socialists, but they now celebrate any woman who reaches the top, even if she serves US imperialism or predatory capitalism. Blacks just want blacks to be on top regardless of the ideology or agenda they're serving. So, who cares if Obama destroyed entire nations? He be a black dude who be calling the shots, sheeeeeiiit. Or consider the feminist praise of that vile movie THE LAST SEDUCTION. The femme fatale bitch in it is just awful and preys on innocent victims, but hey, it's FEMALE empowerment. In a way, the 'anti-fascists' really envied fascism because the 'pornographics of power' meant anything was possible without moral restraint. It's no wonder Nietzsche and Foucault became such neo-leftist icons in the postwar period. Classic leftism meant progressives must seek power in service to a set of ideals. Thus, there were brakes on empowerment. Attainment of power had to be justified on moral grounds. But once identity politics and power-for-power's sake came to define the new proggism, all that mattered was More Power for Myself or My People by any means necessary and for whatever ends. Jews really set the template in this as the Jewish Left and Jewish Right converged on More Jewish Power. Notice how Bernie Sanders eventually turned out to be a Jewish Supremacist First and socialist second because he willfully took a dive and chose not to lead a potentially true leftist movement against the System controlled by Jewish supremacists.)

Now, morality, in seeking what is true, cannot hold too many conflicting values together. If you're opposed to slavery, your morality cannot say "slavery is not okay here, but it's okay over there." You should oppose slavery as a principle. However, culture isn't only about morality. It's a remembrance of the past, the realization and understanding that ideas, values, and attitudes changed over time, a sense that we can't expect other times and other cultures to think and feel just as we do in the righteous moment.
Thus, cultural(and historical) sense has to be more tolerant and empathetic than the moral sense, which by its nature cannot be too tolerant. Ideally, one should be morally righteous but culturally broad in the appreciation of the arts. Surely, even an atheist should be able to appreciate Angkor Wat, Temples of India, Mosques of Arabia, and Cathedrals of Europe. Likewise, even an 'anti-racist' should see merit in THE BIRTH OF A NATION, even an anti-communist should see value in BATTLESHIP POTEMKIN, even sympathizers with American Indians should recognize the glory of American Westerns, and even a Jew should see value in Richard Wagner's operas and Leni Riefenstahl's two landmark 'documentaries'(which are more like 'propamentaries' or propaganda-documentaries). And even an anti-Jewish person should see value in Gustav Mahler, Mendelssohn, and Mel Brooks.

The current Deformation is the worst of all worlds. Not only does the Rage of the Moment dictate moral puritanism that is utterly destructive and demented but the supposed morality is really an immorality. The truth sought in the Reformation was about God and Holiness. One could disagree with the interpretations and arguments of the opposing sides, but at their core it was about genuine search for and defense of sanctity as they understood it. At the very least, they knew better than to worship the cult of man and things. Even Catholics accused by Protestants for idolatry understood that God, Jesus, and Truth were infinitely higher than anything made of stone by human hands.
In contrast, the Deformation cannot conceive of anything higher than George Floyd as Magic Negro. Or consider when Michael Jackson died. You'd think it was the death of god hisself. Deformation cannot conceive of anything holier than drag queens and homos prancing about by hogging the word 'pride'. Deformation cannot think of a higher loyalty that 'Muh Israel' and 'We stand with Israel(as it sucks out the life of remaining Palestinian communities in West Bank). The Deformation isn't merely about tolerance of vices, such as gambling, but promotion of vice as the new virtue, e.g. "Look, gambling is morally justified because it provides reparations for them Indians, thus washing away America's sins!" (How about a casino at Auschwitz?) The Desert Inn Has Heart, the Desert Inn Has Heart. Las Vegas, the Christmas Place To Be!!! Homosexual vanity isn't merely to be tolerated and contained in the homo community. It has to be 'spiritualized' and its symbols must hang in churches!
We've been fed this narrative about linear human progress, but spiritually and morally, are people in the West better off in the crazy 21st century than during the Reformation? Is it 'more progress' to worship Mammon, Magic Negroes, Tooty Homos, and Insane Jewish Supremacists? We were told that mankind went from religion and superstition to reason and sense. So, where is rationality in elevating the criminal Negro up on the spiritual pedestal? Where is the sense in supporting Zionist lunatics in their maniacal schemes? Where is the science in saying a man with penis & balls and wig on his head is really a 'woman'? This sounds more like the Age of Endarkenment than Enlightenment.

If this keeps up, even Scorsese's two magisterial documentaries will have to be scrapped in the spirit of 'canceling' bad culture because too many works discussed can be associated with this-ism, that-ism, or whatever-ism. For the longest time, the Left made kids read Arthur Miller's CRUCIBLE as a warning against authoritarianism, ideological puritanism, and the culture of paranoia. But the warning has now become the blueprint. But then, the same happened with Kafka's THE TRIAL and THE CASTLE. The way Jewish oligarchs are behaving with their power, we must all navigate like K in the novels. We must deal with repression with vague rules where goal posts are constantly moved. We're rendered like the anti-hero in COOL HAND LUKE who must keep digging and digging. But then, there was something disingenuous about Jews like Arthur Miller. He attacked the political puritanism of the American Right in defense of communists whose puritanism and purge-culture were through the roof. This suggests that, in essence, Jews resisted repression not for the ultimate goal of more freedom for everyone but to amass the power to repress all others.

Thursday, June 25, 2020

You are Free.. To Agree... Otherwise, You Must be Destroyed — How the Current Situation in the West is like the Anti-Rightist Movement following the Hundred Flowers Campaign in China — All said and done, the Real Power is Jewish Supremacism, and No Real Change is Possible UNLESS This Truth is Spoken

The current lunacy has often been compared with the Cultural Revolution, but in some ways, it is closer to the aftermath of the Hundred Flowers Campaign.

Consider the story in the video below:

A company that claims to value Diversity of Views & Opinions fired the mother of the Atlanta police officer who was charged with murder of a black guy who resisted arrest with physical violence, snatched the taser from one of the officers, and fired it at them. What was her thought crime? She called it 'nonsense'. She was accused of creating a 'hostile work environment' and canned just like that. So, on the one hand, the company says its policy is about the diversity of views(or freedom of speech) but, in practice, will immediately remove anyone who deviates from the official program.
It sounds like those Jewish oligarchs and commissars at Big Tech, academia & media, law firms & courts, and government who say they are for Free Speech but will not tolerate 'hate speech'(to be subjectively and politically determined by their ilk). So, 'diversity of views' are respected but not when it is 'hostile', like a mother speaking up for her son who was obviously race-framed by the system. So, free speech is wonderful as long as it's not 'hateful', with 'hate' being defined mostly by Jews who apparently think BDS(or speech calling for justice for Palestinians) is 'hateful'. For sure, anti-BDS legislation has the backing of both parties.

Now, what happened in the aftermath of the Hundred Flowers Campaign? Nikita Khrushchev ushered in a new era of de-Stalinization, something the Chinese Communists were very critical of. They feared that criticism of Stalin's legacy would undermine their legitimacy. Still, Mao Zedong wasn't one to be outdone by Khrushchev and decided to have his own experimentation with freedom and go even further. So, he declared the Hundred Flowers Campaign. He urged all Chinese, high and low, to hold nothing back and speak their minds. Initially, most Chinese were hesitant as the first six years of communist rule had been pretty ruthless and repressive. People had either been cowed into fearful conformism or indoctrinated with party dogma. They were scaredy cats or rabid dogs.
When Mao called on the people in and out of government and in all walks of life to speak freely, most people were either hesitant or confused. So, the commissars were instructed to apply pressure on the people to speak up, to complain about something, to let things off their chest. It was as if people were forced to engage in free speech and speaking-truth-to-power. Gradually, one by one, people began to speak out. Then, the voices grew louder and bolder. The criticism went from personal things to local matters to problems at work to the failings of the communist party and then communism itself and finally the big kahuna, Mao himself. Still, people were speaking out ONLY BECAUSE Mao had started the Hundred Flowers Campaign. He was the one who ordered the Chinese people to take part in proto-Glasnost, and they did. They were told to be free in thought and speech, and they spoke their minds.
But when Mao had just about heard enough, he shut down the campaign and those who'd spoken up were rounded up and punished. The serious offenders who denounced the Party and Mao were executed. But even those who mildly rebuked the political system were denounced, fired from work, and sent to forced-labor camps. In the memoir SON OF THE REVOLUTION, Liang Heng told the story of his mother. When the campaign began, she was reluctant to say anything and told her boss that all was well. But her boss pressed upon her to voice some complaint in keeping with the spirit of the times. If Chairman Mao wanted people to speak freely, they should. So, finally and perhaps grudgingly, she made a minor criticism about some details at work. And everything seemed to be fine until Mao called an end to the campaign and ordered his commissars to punish those who had spoken against the Party. Suddenly, the very people who'd urged Liang's mother to speak up came down hard on her. Especially to save their own skins, they had to condemn the very people they'd encouraged to speak freely during the campaign. The new directive, the Anti-Rightist Campaign, was about gathering up all those who'd spoken 'hostile' words about the system and punishing them as class enemies. So, the woman was denounced and fired from the job. Worse, her craven husband divorced her and denounced her, and she was sent to the farms to 'learn from the people'.

So, what is the similarity between China of the Hundred-Flowers-and-Anti-Rightist-Campaigns and the US of today? Back in the mid-1950s, the Chinese were told to value freedom and speak freely... but, as it turned out, they were only free to agree with the dogma and narrative(and to hail Mao to high heaven). If they dared to speak freely against the system, dogma, or narrative, they were to be targeted for denunciation, firing, imprisonment, and even execution. You were free only to agree.

US and the West of today follow a similar logic. They're said to be 'liberal democracies' that value free speech, but that doesn't mean 'hate speech', and of course, ANYTHING can be construed as 'hate speech' by the Jewish Supremacists who rule as overlords. And so-called 'liberal' institutions of media and academia say they value diversity of views and opinions, but they will not tolerate words that create 'hostile' work environments. But what does this mean? It doesn't mean all forms of hostility or aggression are banned. Indeed, certain hostilities are encouraged, as with Facebook and Youtube Terms of Service that, while banning 'hostile views' against Jews, blacks, homos, and the like, are not only okay but encouraging of hostile views against whites, conservatives, true Christians, and nationalists. Diversity Programs encourage everyone, from children to adults, to harbor hostile feelings toward certain groups, especially straight white men, while berating whites to be ever so sensitive about not saying or doing anything that might, just might, offend certain favored groups, especially Jews, blacks, and homos. Whites are forced into fragility but then accused of 'white fragility' as well. Damned if you do, damned if you don't. (But all those whites who wonder why the Chinese acted so stupidly under Mao should look in the mirror because their behavior is just as irrational, stupid, craven, and retarded.)
Now, is this a victory of the Left over the Right? Is it a triumph of Liberalism over Conservatism? Many think so, especially as Tucker Carlson and others of Conservatism Inc. keep blaming the Left, Left, Left. But the real power behind all this is Jewish Tribal Supremacism. True Leftism died long ago. Not only did communism fall in the East but the American Left gave up on workers and cut a deal with super-capitalists of Big Tech, Wall Street, and Global 'free trade'. The triumph of Homo-Mania has NOTHING to do with true leftism. It's faux-leftism that destroyed Mayday in favor of Gayday with full backing of Super-Capital and neo-aristo globalism.
Also, if Antifa is truly communist or against the oligarchy, why does it pick fights mostly with the Dissident Right that has NO POWER in any industry and institution. In effect, Antifa has been valued by Jewish Capitalist Oligarchs as their Janissary force(who attack any sign of white identity or white pride as 'nazi'); Jews promote and protect Antifa thuggery to clamp down on uppity whites who seek White Liberation from the Jewish Supremacist Plantation. Antifa are mostly idiot whites trained and directed by venal Jewish tribalists to hate and attack white patriots. Jews use the goy dolts of Antifa for their own supremacist purposes but hoodwinked the idiots into believing they are fighting the coming of Neo-Nazism to the West.

There is no true left anymore. And it's not a triumph of liberalism either. Liberalism is about individualism, liberty, and free speech. The current power hates individual conscience and free speech. It insists that we all bow our heads and go along to get along with the System dominated by Jewish globo-homo capitalists. Why would Jews approve of individual conscience when a truly free-thinking moralist will surely condemn Zionist tyranny over Palestinians? Jews use PC to dictate approved-morality(the kind that is useful to Jewish Power) on the masses. Sure, some of the current rhetoric has some faux-leftist window-dressing or sentimentalism about 'liberal democratic values'(as opposed to the 'autocratic' ways of Evil Putin and the like), but boiled down to essentials, the dominant power is Jewish Supremacist.
If leftism is about the little guy or the underdog and if indeed leftism is the dominant ideology in the US, the current power should be siding with Palestinians against Zionists. But where do you see that? Some may say BLM movement is leftist in supporting justice for blacks against powerful white 'racism' and 'white privilege', but it's really a form of black supremacism exploited by Jewish supremacism. Blacks act out in supremacist contempt toward the weaker races. They love to holler, intimidate, and do as they please. They don't really care about black lives, or else they'd stop murdering one another. BLM implies that blacks lives are superior to white lives, and that's why it's an unforgivable sin for any white to kill a black; it'd be like a slave killing the master, and blacks feel as the new master race. BLM isn't about remembrance of slavery and the dark past. Rather, it is a cultist-spiritualization of the past to elevate blacks from a people with a tragic history to new gods to be worshiped and ass-kissed by rest of humanity. It is the expression of black god-complex. It is also a form of black nihilism, i.e. blacks can use anything as an excuse to rob, loot, pillage, beat up people, murder whites, shoot police officers, and etc. Blacks can act like animals by pretending to be angels.
In truth, history changes, and blacks today are not what they were 100 yrs ago, just like China today isn't what it was 100 yrs ago. Basing current perception of blacks on past history is like seeing today's China through the prism of China-as-sick-man-of-Asia 100 yrs ago. It's like pretending history is static, rather weirdly ironic coming from progs who are always celebrating the acceleration of history and change. (For those who say blacks are mired in problems due to the legacy of slavery, why not argue blacks are mired in savagery due to the legacy of savagery? After all, blacks were slaves for only 200 yrs in America whereas they were savages for 100,000 yrs in Africa? Isn't the legacy of savagery and its genetic imprint a more determinant driver of black behavior than the meager 200 yrs of slavery, which, at the very least, elevated blacks from the stage of savagery? It's been a common theme among all human groups wherein slavery played a key role as civilizing agent. It was hardly unique to blacks.) And we know Jews aren't sincere in their concern for blacks because they have no qualms about oppressing and terrorizing Palestinians and using the US to wage Wars for Israel that have destroyed millions of lives. And speaking of hate campaigns, which group in Hollywood financed all those movies depicting Arabs/Muslims as nothing but subhuman terrorists? It sure wasn't the Eskimos.

Just like the Corleones in THE GODFATHER movies had a lot of buffers, Jews have a lot of buffers or fronts. Neocons used buffers like Dubya Bush, John McCain, and Mitt Romney. Globo-Homo Zionists had their pet monkey in Barack Obama. BLM is a tool used by Jews for the most cynical reasons. Jews incited BLM rage to turn blacks away from Donald Trump. Jews use BLM to bolster 'white guilt', the key element in keeping whites ashamed and subservient, thus obeisant to Jewish Supremacist Power. The scales will fall off many more eyes when they stop blaming the 'left' or 'liberals' and just name the Power that is Jewish Supremacist.

Though Soviet leaders and CCP bigshots acted like gangsters, they were still in service of an ideology. There is no ideology in the current madness in the West. As such, it's hard to discern any thematic consistency in all that is happening. Instead, we are to believe in the magic of Diversity. But Diversity of Peoples often leads to contention and conflict. Diversity of Ideas means commitment to free speech, but free speech also means speaking-truth-to-power, something Jewish supremacist elites cannot tolerate as they fear being called out(and blamed) as the True Rulers of the West, i.e. Jewish Privilege, not 'white privilege', is the determining force in US and EU.
Because Diversity of Peoples and Cultures leads to conflict, some kind of unity is sought by 'Idology'(or idolatry as ideology) of gods and devils. Since it'd be too confusing to emphasize the equal worth of every group, the trick is to make ALL groups unite in reverence to the Holy Three: Jews, blacks, and homos. That is one part of Intersectionality. Whether you're Mexican, Hindu, Chinese, Iranian, Muslim, Arab, Filipino, or etc, your identity doesn't have much intrinsic value, and therefore, you must rally around the 'gay pride' flag because homos are special, or 'more equal than others'. All unite under Globo-Homo... or BLM or Holocaust-Worship. The other side of Intersectionality is the common denunciation of the Enemy, the Devil, the Whitey. So, never mind the problems among all shades of blacks, browns, yellows, and etc. Where they should all 'intersect' is in demonizing and scapegoating Whitey as the source of all Evil, rather ironic since they all head to or cling to the white worlds(and run from their own peoples and cultures) for better material lives and more Rule of Law.

But behind all this is the Barzini-Hyman-Roth of Jewish Power. Jewish Supremacists are pulling the strings. And yes, the current discourse is uber-stupid because 'idology' is based on cult-worship of idolized groups and witch-hunting of demonized ones. One might say the current ideology is 'anti-racist', but if 'racism' means racial supremacism and demonization of certain groups based on skin color, then it is the reigning zeitgeist of the times. Of course, many are blind to this because whites have IN ESSENCE been associated with racial supremacism while blacks have been branded as eternal 'victims of racism'. But history changes, and the victims of yesterday can be oppressors of today and tomorrow. But under the illogic of current stupidity, even if blacks were to enslave whites and make 'honkeys' pick cotton under the whip, the narrative would drone on and on about the new reality as 'justice' because blacks, even as the new master race, have been tagged as the eternal victim race whereas whites, though the new slave race, has been tagged as the eternal 'racist' master race. Such is the idiocy that blinds people to Zionist tyranny over Palestinians. Because Jews have been tagged as the Eternal Victims of Antisemitism, even criticism of Jews acting like New Nazis toward a weak people like the Palestinians is deemed 'antisemitic' because Jews are righteous and holy no matter what they do. Even as they kill and terrorize as IDF goon squads, they are to be regarded as a bunch of Anne Franks.
But then, white people deserve blame for failing to speak the truth. As long as they don't name Jewish Power in all this, they are hopeless and deserve to lose and fall. Those who are incapable or unwilling to speak the truth deserve no sympathy. They are like cancer patients who refuse to admit they got cancer and seek proper treatment. Are they so fearful of charges of 'racism' and 'antisemitism'? Don't they know that history changes and is not static? Look at China and Japan today as opposed to how things were 100 yrs ago. Look at Roman Empire and Germanic Barbarians when the former was on top and when the latter was on top and sacked Rome. Look at Jews as early immigrants to Palestine that was overwhelmingly Arabic and compare them to Jews who totally dominate Israel/Palestine today. A small immigrant community became the dominant force in the territory.
Blacks were social slaves of whites, but they soon became biological masters over whites. Being more muscular and more aggressive, they began to kick white butt. Blacks complain of 'redlining', but whites suffered even more under black violence and criminality. White Flight was something that was forced on whites by black thuggery. Whites were forced to pay HIGHER PRICES for property values just to be safe and secure from black neo-savagery. If whites were guilty of redlining, blacks were guilty of front-lining, i.e. turning entire localities into front-lines of black war on white. Many whites didn't want to leave their ethnic communities in the cities. They had roots there. They left because of the black fist and oogity-behavior. But no one talks about the biological slavery of whites under black thuggery. White Flight was like Harriet-Tubmanism for whites. If blacks tried to flee to the north from social slavery in the South, whites tried to flee from biological slavery under black thuggery. And Jews are full of shit because Jew Flew was part of White Flight. And what brought down crime in places like NY in the 1990s and 2000s? Jews worked with Billy Boy Clinton to build neo-plantations of prison systems to incarcerate lots of black super-predators who were exploited for cheap labor.

Wednesday, June 17, 2020

Tribalism vs Universalism. And then, there's 'TRIVERSALISM' where a Certain Tribe becomes the Universal Idol for Other Groups to Revere and Worship — BLM as 'Triversal' Identity — Imperialism of Guilt and Its Dangers — Universalization of White Guilt about Jews and Blacks

According to Dr. Steve Turley, there is a silver lining to the rise of BLM as the defining theme of 'leftism'. Unbeknownst to the so-called 'progressives', the hysterical emphasis on the sanctity of black lives uber alles may have a fracturing and alienating effect on the 'political left', especially as the modern left has roots in the universalist and individualist principles of the Enlightenment.

So, what will happen to the Diversity Coalition? Many Non-Black Minorities surely noticed that the Democratic Party and Establishment don’t care about them as black thugs and white antifa retards loot, riot, commit arson, and/or just destroy things, especially the properties and businesses of who rank lower in the Holy-Victim-Hierarchy. All they hear is that ONLY BLACK LIVES Matter from the prevailing mantric Narrative. And prior to BLM-mania, it had mostly been about homos and trannies uber alles. Will such selective favoritism lead to bitterness among Non-Black Minority groups? Will they feel betrayed by the 'Left' that is certainly not colorblind?

According to Steve Turley, the rise of BLM undermines leftism because black tribalism is at odds with the core principles of modernism. (Watch the Video Below.) Though rationalized as something akin to the Civil Rights Movement, a call for racial justice than black supremacism, the blind rage that fuels BLM's fantasy-narrative is inseparable from the blatancy of black identity and black pride. Following Turley’s logic, the rise of BLM will likely lead to fractures within Diversity as each group will cling closer to its own tribalism, just like blacks with BLM.


But what if that doesn’t happen? What if a certain tribalism becomes a kind of ‘triversalism’, one where a particular tribe becomes universally adulated by other tribes? In a way, the US was ‘triversal’ from the beginning. Non-Anglos looked up to Anglos as dominant, most powerful, and even most admirable. And so, non-Anglo whites revolved around Anglo identity and power. They sought to emulate Anglo-Americans and become Anglo-ized. This was true even of German Jews in the US; they aspired to be like the Boston Brahmins and Anglicized their Jewish-sounding names.
Anglo culture, language, habits, and values became the standard for other groups. Though sold as Americanism than Anglo-ism, to become an American was essentially to become Anglo-ized in one way or another: Anglo Way Matters. But because Anglo-Americans didn’t nail down Anglo-ness as the essence of Americanism, their star was bound to fade. (Though Islam is a universal faith, it did for Arab culture what Americanism did for Anglo culture, at least for quite a spell. To become a Muslim meant submitting to the ways and customs of the Arab peoples. For a time, Islam was disseminated only through Arabic, deemed a holy language of the Prophet.)
The rise of Jewish Power has been a kind of ‘triversalism’. If we follow Turley’s logic, Jewish ethnocentrism, tribal identity, and even supremacism should have led to rises of similar tribalism among other groups. Instead, what we’ve seen is just about every group in both parties hail Israel, praise Jews, and pledge to do everything for Zion. Instead of boosting their own identity to compete with the Jewish one, they pledged fealty and obedience to the power and prestige of Jews. Indeed, if Liberal homos and Conservative Evangelicals have one thing in common, it is total commitment to praising Jews, remembering the Holocaust, and supporting Israel(because it’s either God’s Land or the nation with the biggest homo ‘pride’ parade). Though the Shoah is remembered as a uniquely Jewish tragedy, it has been ‘universalized’ to the extent that all other peoples are to acknowledge Jews as the most tragic people on Earth, therefore deserving of the most sympathy from all corners of the world; otherwise, you are an 'Anti-Semite'!!

So, it is not true, as Turley argued, that the rise in tribalism of one group necessarily leads to counter-tribalism in other groups. Spanish insisted on the primacy of their culture, language, and identity in the New World, but this didn’t lead to the counter-emergence of indigenous identities. Instead, the native browns submitted to the stronger tribal-centrism of the Conquistadores, and Spanish Identity became the regional ‘universal’ in Latin America. After all, what do Italians in Argentina have in common with browns in some Mexican village? They are united by Latino ‘triversal’ identity.

And consider the rise of homos and the wider cultural consequences. While homos are not really a tribe, they constitute a much-hyped identity and interest group. As homos(and even truer of trannies) are a tiny minority in all nations, one might think their identity and ‘pride’ would mean NOTHING(or even something negative and hostile) to the overwhelming majorities that are straight. Or, in counter to homo identity, straight people should insist even more on their normal identity. But instead, homosexuality and even tranny business have become the unifying ‘universal theme’ among so many straight people the world over. Homos praise themselves, and straights praise homos… just like Jews praise themselves and goyim praise Jews. There are now ‘gay pride’ parades all over the world, not just in US vassal-states but even in Vietnam that lost 2 million in resistance to US imperialism. Even Cuba cucked to globo-homo-mania.

And this also seems to be the case with blacks. By Turley’s logic, the rise of BLM should lead to similar identity movements among other groups: Brown Lives Matter, Yellow Lives Matter, Red Lives Matter, White Lives Matter, and etc. But blacks have gained ‘triversal’ value. They are now seen as so special, tragic, magical, awesome, and/or whatever that so many non-black groups look to blacks as the people deserving of special love, sympathy, and concern by ALL the peoples of the world. Indeed, look at BLM protests and riots no both sides of the Atlantic, even among whites in Europe. Blacks dominate pop music and sports, and that means they are the main heroes and idols of youths all over the world. Chinese boys worship NBA stars as gods. Iranian youths and Vietnamese youths ape American rappers. White women got jungle fever for black dongs, and white male cucks have Jungle Faith in the Magic Negro. Jewish Media promoted black tragedy as the greatest tragedy of all time AFTER the Shoah. Even though the number of blacks killed by lynching is minuscule compared to other tragedies — more Poles died at Katyn in a single event than all the blacks who were lynched by whites over 100 yrs —, but Hollywood and World Media fill the eyes and ears of the world with ‘Muh Holocaust’ and ‘Muh Slavery’ narratives. The cult of White Guilt has been spread by none other than hegemonic US imperialism. And even though there is non-stop narrative about black suffering in US history, there is no discussion of how the US lifted blacks up from savagery in the Dark Continent where they didn’t even have written language and the wheel. Indeed, if the world now believes that slavery is evil, it’s only because hearts-and-minds in all five continents have been colonized with Western Values.
Anyway, the fact that so many non-Jews, non-homos, and non-blacks flock around those three groups as the holy trinity of globalism suggests that not all tribalisms are the same. If all tribes were of the same value, the rise in tribalism in one would likely lead to the rise of counter-tribalism in others. But if a particular tribe is deemed especially great, awesome, noble, and/or magical, its apotheosis might become the unifying idol for other tribes.
Indeed, it's similar among individuals, which is why individualism never leads to egalitarianism. The ascendant prestige of one individual doesn’t necessarily lead to similar or counter-consciousness in other individuals. Rather, the Great Individual becomes the focal point of admiration and fascination for the lesser individuals, a kind of human cenotaph around which other individuals encircle in a state of reverence or ecstasy. The rise of fuhrer-ism in Adolf Hitler didn’t lead to the rise of counter-fuhrer-ism among the German population. Hitler’s super-individuality led to the dissolution of individual agency and pride among other Germans who came to mindlessly shout ‘Heil Hitler’ and pledge undying allegiance to him.

It goes to show that idolatry can be bigger than any ideology. Jews, Negroes, and Homos have attained ‘triversal’ status in the West. As their stars burn brighter, the lesser stars of other groups don’t even aspire to burn equally as bright but slavishly accept the superior radiance of the Holy Three as the defining light of the galaxy.

Promoting BLM all over the world is an example of the Imperialism of Guilt.

Western Powers used to practice an Imperialism of Pride: “We whites are awful proud, and you lesser non-whites must serve our greatness.” In other words, non-white identities should universally serve the higher white identity. Thus, Western Enlightenment Universalism was less the abandonment of all identities and cultures than the suppression or subsuming of lesser identities in service to the greater ones, the peaks of human achievement that all of humanity must universally admire, revere, and serve. And it was whiteness and Western Civilization. And even among those who emphasized Religion or Rationalism than white identity, there was an overwhelming sense that Christianity and Modernity were both nearly synonymous with white greatness and power.

As of now, Western Powers are under Jewish Rule, and they export the Imperialism of Guilt. “We whites are awfully ashamed, and ALL OF HUMANITY must share in our white guilt… even if you peoples had nothing to do with the Shoah or slavery in America.”

So, it went from All the World should follow Whites because Whites have so much to be Proud of … TO… All the World should follow Whites because Whites have so much to Atone for.

Why is this dangerous? Because it forces the particular Guilt of Whites on the entire world. Palestinians were among the greatest victims of this mindset. The Imperialism of Guilt argued “Because whites feel guilty about what was done to Jews in WWII, all the world must share in the guilt and pay the price.” So, Palestinians were made to pay the price of ‘white guilt’ even thought they had NOTHING to do with World War II or the Shoah. And what was said when Palestinians resisted Zionist Imperialism? They were judged in accordance to the logic of the Imperialism of Guilt. They were branded as ‘Anti-Semites’ even though their reason for anti-Jewish resistance had NOTHING to do with European Antisemitism. According to that craven sniveling cuck-historian Andrew Roberts, the ENTIRE WORLD was guilty for not having done enough about the Shoah. How laughable. Most of the world had NOTHING to do with European affairs or the machinations behind WWII. Why should the world share in the European 'guilt' over what befell Jews in WWII? Should the whole world share in the guilt of Mongols who once invaded China, Persia, and Russia?
After the Cold War, the Imperialism of Guilt led to Wars for Israel that killed or destroyed countless lives in the Middle East and North Afrca. But such wars and aggression were justified on grounds of the Imperialism of Guilt. If 'white guilt' means white indebtedness to Jews, all of humanity must share in the moral/financial debt, even though most of the world had nothing to do with ‘antisemitism’. Not only must Germans pay reparations to Jews but so must Palestinians who, indeed, lost their homeland to Jews on grounds that the World owes Jews something. The Imperialism of Guilt imposed the Western Burden of Guilt on the Palestinians even though they had nothing to do with the tragic events of Western History. Not supporting Zionism and Israeli interests would constitute a new antisemitism, the rise of new hitlers, and new holocausts. So, the West feels compelled to support More Jewish Wars. And even though Israel is the most powerful and aggressive nation in the region, we must all stick with the Western Guilt narrative that says Jews are always scrappy underdogs struggling to survive against ‘hate’.

And now, the Imperialism of Guilt is spreading Negrolatry all around. Most nations had nothing to do with blacks, let alone the Atlantic Slave Trade. But the White Guilt Narrative about blacks is being made standard all around the world. Many nations have been made to worship Mandela above their own national heroes, idols, and leaders. They know more about the Negro Victim Narrative than about their own peoples.
So, even browns, yellows, Hindus, and etc. must all share in the special sympathy for blacks. If not, they are ‘racist’. (Indeed, the financial burden of reparations for blacks will largely fall on the non-white immigrant populations who arrived in the US a hundred years AFTER the Civil War. Imperialism of Guilt in action.) What applies to whites due to their ‘historical guilt’ now applies to the whole world. Japan never conquered Africa or brought over black slaves. But if Japan doesn’t open up to blacks, it is deemed ‘racist’. It's as if Japanese must be just as servile to blacks as whites have become. Of course, Cuckpan is doing just that, and its sports idols are being taken over by blacks, and so Japan is over in the long term. In Europe, the result of the Imperialism of Guilt(or more specifically the Imperialism of White American Guilt) is already evident and very dire. Even European nations that had NOTHING to do with overseas imperialism, Atlantic Slave Trade, and the like now share in the White American Guilt. Swedes and Finns feel a need to sympathize with the Noble Negro and open their nations to Africans. If not, they are ‘racist’ just like Southern rednecks.

Now, some people may welcome the Imperialism of White Guilt as a case of the US undermining its own legitimacy and power. After all, if white America is confessing before the world how evil and lowly it is, wouldn’t the self-flagellation undermine the American Hegemonic enterprise? Yes, but ONLY IF the US were still ruled by whites and ONLY IF White Guilt applied equally to all groups, e.g. Palestinians, Syrians, Russians, Iranians, etc.

But the fact is the US is not white-ruled. It is Jewish-ruled, and BLM is merely a Jewish Power Ploy to boost the cult of White Guilt to keep whites subservient to Jewish Supremacist Power. After all, the Narrative of BLM doesn’t focus on Jewish exploitation of blacks, Jewish role in the slave trade, Jewish use of gentrification, Jewish push for the Israelization of US police force, Jewish use of globo-homo to send black interests to the back of the bus, and etc. BLM narrative is all about white working class police ‘brutality’ and ‘white legacy of slavery’. So, BLM is less about black power than about Jewish supremacist power exploiting ‘white guilt’ about blacks to keep whites browbeaten. Jewish Power is saying to whites, “We Jews are holy, whereas you whites are vile and guilty. So, to redeem your ugly white souls that oppressed all those innocent blacks, you whites need to serve us Holy Holocaust Jews in securing Imperialist Hegemony over the world.”
Notice US embassies are not putting up signs that say “Palestinian Lives Matter” or “Syrian Lives Matter” or “Libyan Lives Matter”. Or considering how many Russians died in the privatization or piratization schemes of the 1990s pushed by Jewish-Americans, “Russian Lives Matter.” No, Jews only push Black Lives Matter as a tool of ‘white guilt’ to keep white folks subservient as the cuck-race that blindly supports Jewish supremacist imperialism around the world that has killed or destroyed millions of lives through wars, sanctions, and financial piracy.
This is why those who see the BLM as being fatal to US imperialism are wrong. Sure, it does tarnish America’s reputation by making it seem a ‘racist’ country. But it is a Jewish gambit. Jews know that the MOST IMPORTANT element in the maintenance of Jewish Supremacist Hegemony is white submission to Jewish Power. As BLM will further shame whites, whites will feel even more compelled to serve the Holy Peoples: Jews, blacks, and homos. Indeed, look at Donald Trump. He’s cucking to Jews and siding with the Negroes against the Police.

In some ways, the Imperialism of White Guilt about Blacks will be even more damaging than the Imperialism of White Guilt about Jews. Whereas the latter led to the destruction mainly of North Africa and the Middle East, the Universalization of the Guilt about Blacks will lead to the junglization of entire nations around the world. Canada and UK used to be mostly black-free, but now, it’s deemed ‘racist’ for anyone there to say NO MORE BLACKS. Even though blacks commit the most crimes and cause the most problems, the Imperialism of Guilt about Blacks ensures that the global media will ignore stories of black thuggery/savagery while amplifying any story of a Dead Innocent Negro because Black Lives Matter More, or BLMM according to the Imperialism of Guilt. After all, black military men have been known to rape and even murder Japanese women in Okinawa. But has the US embassy ever held up a sign saying ‘Japanese Lives Matter’? No. Japan and other nations are constantly excoriated for their, as yet, less-than-ecstatic perception of blacks whereas so little is made of out-of-control bad black behavior around the world. The Ugly African makes the Ugly American look mild by comparison… but Jews control the global media and narrative, and Negroes be Holy.