It’s been said(by Mark Twain?) that history doesn’t repeat itself but rhymes. A notable historical rhyme is between the current Taiwan crisis and the Manchurian crisis of the 1920s/1930s. In either case, a non-Chinese, even anti-Chinese, imperialist power attempts to pry away a key Chinese territory under dubious pretexts.
Japan coveted parts of northeast China, especially Manchuria(connected to Korea, already a Japanese colony)and concocted an ‘enlightened’ and ‘humanistic’ justification for the landgrab. Japan insisted that Manchuria or Manchukuo is an autonomous region worthy of independence from China, and its presence was as a brotherly power to secure the integrity of the Manchurian nation, one to be led by its rightful emperor(said to be on friendly terms with the Japanese counterpart).
Initially, Japan had set its eyes on swathes of Siberia as well and took full opportunity of the Russian Civil War to occupy its easternmost part. But when the Soviet Union grew in power and dealt a series of setbacks to Japanese ambitions, the two domains settled on a kind of compromise. Mongolia, long part of the Chinese Empire, would serve as a puppet state of the Soviet Union(though this process was initiated under the Tsar) while Japan would spread its influence over Manchuria.
In both cases, there was a nominal illusion of national sovereignty when, in fact, Mongolia was a satellite of the Soviets while Manchuria was being transformed into the jewel in the crown of the Japanese Empire. The Mongolian case was somewhat contradictory because the Soviet Union was officially anti-imperialist, whereas Japan, along with the European powers, openly claimed to practice a kind of benign and enlightened imperialism, even at times preaching a kind of comradely pan-Asianism at odds with the non-Asian powers.
The Soviets could be faulted for hypocrisy, but one could argue a truly independent Mongolia wasn’t viable at the time. If the Soviets left it alone, Japan would have gobbled it up. As far as the Chinese were concerned, Mongolia should have been part of their civilization given the long interaction between Mongolia and China. (Besides, the Mongols, upon invading China in tandem with the Manchus, had de facto become a part of Sinosphere.)
At any rate, even though China was irate with both cases, it could afford to lose Mongolia, mostly a sparsely populated desert, whereas Manchuria was geographically, demographically, and economically essential to the development and security of China. (Similarly, Russia can tolerate Finland and Sweden as new members of NATO but not Ukraine serving as a dagger to the heart of Russia.)
As monstrous as Japan’s intrusion into Northwest China turned out to be, it was at least understandable given Japan’s limited resources and desperate economic straits. For all its rapid advancement and process into modernity, Japan’s place in the world was precarious given that the rest of the world had been carved up by Russia and the Western powers.
What is truly appalling about US neo-imperialism is that the US has so much and doesn’t need an empire for power, peace, and prosperity. America itself is an empire-sized country. Canada is essentially its front yard while Mexico(and much of Latin America) is its backyard. The US has Japan, South Korea, and Philippines as whore-puppets. The EU is now just a vassal of the US(as the Jewel in the Crown of the Empire of Judea).
Unlike Japan in the 1920s/30s, the US has tons of everything, land and resources and control of sea routes. And yet, it virtually lays claim to Taiwan as well and, in doing so, accuses China of aggression for seeking eventual reunification with an island that had long been part of China?
In this respect, the US empire is surely the most obnoxious in history, made worse by its craven servitude to the petty imperialism of Jewish supremacist gangsters who, despite all their riches, cannot let go of the dream of completing their once attempted rape of the Russian economy. Given its current character of utter depravity, the richest country in the world with an excess of billionaires and lots of fat people continues to occupy entire swaths of Syria to steal its grain and oil from a desperate people whose lives have been torn asunder by terrorist proxies of the US, Israel, and their duplicitous allies. The current US is many times worse than Imperial Japan as its policies are driven by vanity and avarice than necessity and desperation.
Fast forward in history, and Manchuria reverted back to Chinese control with the defeat of the Japanese Kwantung Army at the hands of the Soviet Union. And with the end of the Cold War, Mongolia gained something like full independence and now exists in a kind of limbo among the influences of Russia, China, and the US(with its cash prizes). In the future, Mongolia will likely remain independent but become absorbed into the Sinosphere. At any rate, there is no controversy about the status of Manchuria. It’s part of China.
But now, we have the Taiwan Problem. Just as Japan claimed the role of protector of Manchurian independence against Chinese resurgence or revanchism, the US professes to be the noble defender of Taiwanese independence and freedom, aka ‘democracy’.
Of course, the difference is that, whereas Japan didn’t acknowledge China’s claim on Manchuria, the US under the Nixon-Kissinger administration accepted that Taiwan is a part of China and hoped for a gradual and peaceful reconciliation and reunification between the two states.
But with growing anti-Chinese sentiment, the agreement(that Taiwan is part of China) has come to be in name only. In actual policy, the US is clearly working to drive a permanent wedge between China and Taiwan(as has de facto been accomplished with the division of Korea). As Xi Jinping said to Joe Biden and Anthony Blinken, “You say this but do that. It no good.”
There has been a kind of perfect storm developing in the politics of hostility towards China. The most obvious reason is the US became accustomed to its role as the lone superpower since the collapse of the Soviet Union. Hubris is like an addictive drug. The US has also grown accustomed to the prestige as the hegemon over all of the Pacific, the East as well as the West, following the collapse of the Japanese Empire that, for a time, laid claim to the control of the Asian Pacific. (Especially as East Asia is the only part of the world that caught up more or less with the West in wealth-generation and technological prowess, the US maintains Western hegemony through the control of trade routes and positioning of military bases to encircle the Asian landmass.)
The Cold War justified American’s continued presence in the East Pacific, especially as China had fallen to the communists. Furthermore, in fear of Red China, non-communist Asian countries leaned to the US for protection, especially given the inferno in Vietnam and the Domino Theory.
But with the end of the Cold War and China’s acceptance of market economics(and interconnection with the economies all around Asia), the US could have receded from Asian Pacific but chose not to due to the military industrial complex, imperial pride, and paranoia that China as the newly risen counter-hegemon might pose a threat to America’s role in the world. (Ironically, China’s emphasis on global economic ties vs America’s emphasis on global military control may come to favor China in the eyes of the world. People would rather trade carrots than be threatened with the stick. If, during the Cold War, much of the world was willing to accept US military might as a nightstick against the commies, the idea that the world relies on US power for peace and prosperity is becoming ever more specious and far-fetched with each passing year, especially as any honest observer can see that the US, far from being a fair broker, is now essentially the aircraft carrier and bomber fleet for Zion.)
There is perhaps also, in the recesses of the White American mind, the Yellow Peril complex that began with the sudden rise of Japan in the 19th century. If a small island nation with limited resources could rise so fast and pose a challenge to the Western world order, what might the rise of China, with its vast population and considerable resources, mean for the world, especially Western dominance?
Of course, the current moral logic of the anti-Chinese argument differs from those in the past, at least in rhetoric. A century ago, the Yellow Peril thing was about the challenge the yellows may pose to the White Race, the White West, White Hegemony. Such is verboten today as whites, under Jewish influence, have accepted white self-loathing, race-mixing & jungle fever, diversity celebration via the great replacement(or White Nakba), and etc.
So, the argument against China is more along the lines of “Chinese are the real racists because China is mostly dominated by the Han Chinese.” In other words, white people are now supposed to hate China for having the kind of racial views whites did a century ago.
This is, of course, a stretch. China is mostly Chinese because it’s China. It’s not a colonial-settler state like the United States, Canada, and Australia where one people replaced another, though an argument could be made for Tibet and Xinjiang(but then, the West more or less accepted those areas as part of China before the takeover by the CCP).
China-bashing today has replaced the Japan-bashing of the 1980s, a period when Japan seemed poised to dominate the world through wealth, consumer products, and technology(whereas the Chinese then rode around in bicycles and were only beginning to assemble cheap lighters and can-openers.)
For a time, the US and China were loosely united in their anti-Japan stance. The US felt compelled to put Japan back in its place and make it do as told(instead of making noises like Shintaro Ishihara, the author of JAPAN THAT CAN SAY NO). China, in its post-Maoist phase, needed a theme to rally the nation around, and it became Japan-bashing by reviving painful memories of the past. China felt safe in targeting Japan that was, for all its wealth, politically weak. It was safer than bashing Russia or the US; and besides, if China, Russia, and the US had one point of shared narrative, it was pride in the defeat of the Axis Power of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan. (In retrospect, it was stupid on the part of China as it only served to alienate the Japanese and sour future relations between the two countries, playing into the American hands.) But the steady decline of Japan and the dramatic rise of China(plus its political sovereignty) meant that the main rivalry would be between the US and China.
Still, there is no single reason for China-bashing. Partly, it’s a convenient diversion for the globalist capitalist oligarchs in the US who fulsomely profited from shipping factories to China. By blaming China for ‘stealing American jobs’, populist working class ire is directed at China, thus deflected from the oligarchic class who shipped the jobs overseas to maximize their own wealth. The ‘stolen by China’ narrative conceals the ‘sent by oligarchs’ truth. It’s like Rush Limbaugh praising Walmart for its superb capitalism while dumping on the ‘Chicoms’ for the problems of globalism.
Also, China’s size and power abroad plus the Chinese minority’s relative silence and compliance in the US makes for easy criticism and revulsion. Even as China is painted as the big bad wolf, the Chinese in the US are either too timid, submissive, or craven to ever speak up for their own country(contra to the Jews who go to hell and back for Israel).
And speaking of Jews, there is also the factor of their tribal interests. China-bashing diverts attention not only from the betrayal of the capitalist-globalist oligarchs but from the domination by Jews. By ragging about the Chi-coms as Alex Jones does or blaming the Chinese as the ‘real racists'(or ethnocentric nationalists) as Tucker Carlson does, it creates the impression that China poses the real threat and may already control entire sectors of the US. If you’re a ‘patriotic’ conservative but too chicken to name the Jewish Power, how safer to harp about the Chicoms buying up all the farmland! Or screech that “China controls Hollywood!” or “China uses Tiktok to promote green-haired lesbians with piercings.”
Thus, Americans are duped into blaming China than Jewish Power for all the problems facing the US. Take the southwestern border. Instead of blaming the Jews-around-Biden like Mayorkas for destroying border security, run a narrative about how Xi is sending military-aged men across the border to set up a secret army to take over America, apparently like in the remake of RED DAWN.
There are plenty of Americans dumb enough to believe such fantasies(like the suspicion of Barack Obama being a secret Muslim agent when everything about his rise and policy was thoroughly Jewish/Zionist), but the anti-China hysteria is also useful to white brownnosers who do know the truth. These whites have been so browbeaten and conditioned to look up to Jews as the rightful masterful race that they simply cannot conceive of pushing back when Jews pummel and beat them to the ground. These whites operate on the foundation of “Jews rule and deserve to rule”, meaning that even when Jews do whites wrong, the most that whites can hope is for Jews to change their minds and be a bit kinder to whites. These whites know Jews got the power and abuse whites, but their position isn’t to push back and fight back but to do whatever is necessary to court favor with the Jews. By fulminating against China, they are signaling to Jews, “We whites and you Jewish whites, how about us joining together against the Real Other? You beat and kick us, but we never blame you and always stand beside or behind you all the way. So, how about we bash China together than you bashing us?” Of course, Jews see through this and hold such cuckery in contempt as wussy weakness(even as they take advantage of it).
Jews also hate China more than ever because of the Russia Factor. The Jewish Plan for Russia is hardly different from the Nazi German plan of ‘lebensraum’. If Germans had the numbers to actually invade Russia, hopefully defeat and colonize it with tens of millions of German farmers, Jews have no such means of outright conquest. But they know they can take over financially and culturally, reduce the Russian elites to cuck-maggot collaborators, and engineer a series of programs to reduce Russia more or less into a globalist colony of Jewish hegemony.
After all, Jews managed to pull it off in the Anglosphere where most white elites are cuck-collaborators and facilitate the policies of White Nakba. (Against such hostility, the most that whites can manage to dredge up is, “Master Jews, please don’t push diversity. Not because it hurts us whites, who don’t matter because it’s NOT okay to be white, but because it will likely hurt you wise and wonderful Jews, and you know that we whites place YOUR security and well-being above all else, not least over our own interests that have no validity as whiteness must be erased.”) Jews have succeeded with the White Nakba agenda in Anglosphere and most of the EU(as even Poland is going that way), and of course, Ukraine has been turned into a Jewish-gangster-paradise, more Blackrockville than anything like a sovereign Slavic nation. But Russia, despite its entrenched fifth-column network, hasn’t fallen to total Jewish Hegemony.
China, given that its meteoric economic rise owes much to US markets, was supposed to do the bidding of the US against Russia, not least because Sino-Russian relations have long been uneasy. But China sensed that Russia no longer poses any real threat to China and has kept to the terms agreed upon in the meeting between Deng Xiaoping and Mikhail Gorbachev.
Contra Russia’s conciliatory approach to China, the US has been playing fast-and-loose with the Taiwan issue and ramping up military ‘alliances’ with Japan and other Asian puppets. Even as China worked with the US to isolate North Korea, the US has been drumming up South Korean animus against China. Also, the US naval bases are the most worrisome to China. The Russian/Soviet military threat that once breathed down China’s neck is all but gone.
Furthermore, Russia-China relations are based on multi-polarity and civilizational conceptions, i.e. both have their own systems of rule and cultures/traditions and respect each other as such, whereas the US/West pushes a single ‘rules-based-order’ for all, made worse by the fact that the so-called ‘rules’ are made up by the West, or more accurately by the Jews who control the West. These rules don’t apply equally to all but are bent and twisted to serve Jewish hegemonic interests. Even if the US cannot defeat China in the struggle over Taiwan, China’s takeover of Taiwan could be used as the rationale to sanction China and grab its assets in the West(and renege on debt obligations).
That China has chosen to back Russia in world affairs is taken by Jews as a kind of betrayal. Of course, China doesn’t see it that way. As long as it’s concerned, the main obligation of China is to look out for its own national interests, and if China’s ties with Russia are good for China(and Russia believes it’s good for Russia), then there should be no problem. It’s just diplomacy.
But such a perspective requires a multipolar vision of the world of sovereign countries. Jews, in their Judeo-Centrism, believe that goyim exist to revolve around and serve Jews. As far as Jews are concerned, they helped build up China to use it as a piece(a big piece to be sure) in the Judeo-Centric Puzzle. Thus, whatever China does, it mustn’t obstruct the grand global design of the Jews.
Jewish arrogance along these lines was aggrandized by total white cuckery to the Tribe. Having grown so accustomed to all the goyim in the West groveling before and carrying water for Zion, Jews are easily triggered and offended when some countries refuse to similarly toe the line. They feel ‘betrayed’ given their unipolar(or Junipolar) vision of the world.
It’s like polytheism allows for different peoples to worship different gods, but monotheism denounces anyone who rejects the one true god as a heathen, infidel, or worse. Jews are into self-worship and expect all the world to worship them, and the white race added fuel to the fire by sucking up to Jews at every turn, but then, just about all the goyim do the same in the West. Be they white, black, brown, yellow, or etc. they are busy sucking the Zionic dong. Blacks like their bling, and as long as Jews shower them with da gold and shit, dey be acting da co-imperialist in the Zionist global hegemony. They don’t own the limousine but get to drive it and receive good tips.
Given all these factors, the failure(due to incompetence, rashness, or willfulness) of diplomacy can well lead to a major conflagration over Taiwan, just like the Manchurian issue set off the conflagration between China and Japan. That’s where the histories then and now rhyme, but of course, current conditions are nothing like in the past. If China then was divided(mainly between the pro-communists and the KMT) in its war with Japan, China is today united as a single force. And if China was in the infancy of industrial development when Japan invaded, China today is the biggest manufacturing power in the world. Although still dwarfed militarily by the US and would easily be defeated in a Midway kind of scenario — navy vs navy in the middle of the Pacific — , it has enough missiles to sink the US fleet close to Chinese shores.
One advantage of the US is its vast network of alliances in the Pacific. If Imperial Japan increasingly found itself isolated as the war dragged on in China without a clear victory, even resulting in the oil-and-iron embargo by the US, the US today has Japan, South Korea, Philippines, and of course Taiwan on its side. But, are Japan and South Korea willing to fully join with the US in a war with China that they know will only grow stronger in the coming years, especially as the young today in those countries are ‘herbivorous’ sissy soyboy gay-K-pop dorks? South Koreans may worry that if they join the war, China may back North Korea against the South in a big way. If the Japanese are smart and imaginative, they could use the anti-China hysteria to build up their military and then use it to wrest itself from the clutches of Uncle Sam, but don’t expect the shallow and craven Japanese to think that far ahead. Japan is now just a shameless whore-mamasan of the Jewish-run US. It has a globohomo Zionist dildo deep up its arse(and enjoys it like the bitch that it is).
Of course, the China-bashers will say they have nothing against the Chinese, only against autocracy, ‘communism’, tyranny, and etc., i.e. they are not ‘racist’ against Asians and only oppose Chinese authoritarianism. After all, they are full of praise for the Asian democracies. But this is nonsense given that US hostility in the 1980s was mostly directed at ‘democratic’ Japan than at autocratic China, which received friendlier and more sympathetic Western press at the time.
What the US really means is that it can accept Asians as collaborators, servitors, satellites, and puppets but not as a truly sovereign power that conceives of its own interests and forges its own path.
The US position on Asia is much like the Jewish position on whites. Whites having autonomy, agency, and pride isn’t tolerable. It’s ‘far right’ and ‘extremist’. But whites doing the bidding of Jews and outsourcing their agency to Zion is all very well. Whites can be successful and rich(like Asians in South Korea, Taiwan, and Japan) but they cannot be independent of the Jewish Will. Whites must be satellites, cucks, and dogs of the Jews.
Likewise, the US can accept a poor and backward Asia(like China in the 80s) or a rich and servile Asia(like Japan and Taiwan), but it cannot accept a rich, independent, and powerful Asia, which China now seems to be(and what Japan was feared of becoming in the 80s with its rising wealth and influence). Besides, a sovereign China is far more difficult to contend with and/or contain than, say, Vietnam, also a sovereign state but hardly a major power in world affairs.
It could be that the US hoped that China, despite its size and pride of history, could be made subordinate to the West, especially given the fate of Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea(and ironically, even the ideological dynamics of China, Vietnam, and North Korea under communism). This owes to the spiritual shallowness of East Asia. India has spiritual richness and autonomy with Hinduism. Countries like Indonesia and Malaysia have Islam, a spiritual force that has resisted both Christianity and communism.
While Confucianism has a kind of quasi-spiritual depth in its reverence of ancestors, the rise of modernity made way for Neo-Confucianism that spat on the graves of ancestors and focused almost entirely on test-taking for material success and status. Thus, if traditional Confucianism kept the elites reverentially rooted to the past, neo-Confucianism has made modern Asians obsessed about the future, even to the point where East Asians don’t want to have children (1) as obstacles to their enjoyment of the futuristic or (2) unless they can be assured that their children will do well and have a niche in future success.
Even in the acceptance of communism, East Asia became future/foreign driven, what with Maoism unleashing the Cultural Revolution that called on revolutionary youths to lay waste to all things old and reactionary. And before Mao’s triumph, Chiang Kai-Shek of the KMT had converted to Christianity(like his wife before him). With Marxism-Leninism-Stalinism, East Asians almost entirely rejected their own traditions in favor of a foreign ideology.
Without a powerful spiritual grounding, East Asia and its brand of neo-Confucianism is success/status-obsessed. And as the West, especially the US, has come to represent all things rich, powerful, progressive, cool, and what-have-you, most of East Asia naturally tilt to the West. After all, Japanese, Taiwanese, and South Koreans seemed to relish imitating all things Western in fashion, attitude, culture, and ideology. Much of anime is Japanese imagining themselves as white, and K-Pop seems to be Koreans basing themselves on anime characters.
To be sure, Japan was a special historical case, somewhat unique in East Asia. Unlike China, Korea, and even Vietnam that allowed Confucianism to smother the deeper ‘pagan’ roots of the culture, Japan maintained its unique spiritual essence via Shintoism and reverence for the Emperor. Thus, it possessed a kind of spiritual depth or at least peculiarity, but it was all lost when Japan met defeat in the Pacific War and the emperor was reduced to a kind of Japanese Charlie Chaplin, a ridiculous figure. And in time, merchant mentality replaced samurai mentality, and Japan’s been a soulless place ever since.
As for China, despite its defiance spirit against the West and the pride of finally having ‘stood up’, it was rather incredible that a people with such depth of history and civilization could so totally take up a foreign ideology(Marxism-Leninism-Stalinism) and use it to ruthlessly wage war on their own culture. Mao’s China was politically independent but enslaved to the vision of a modern Jewish prophet and its Russo-Soviet secular-priesthood.
Then, it’s understandable why the West thought that the spiritually shallow East Asia would eventually fold and fall in line. West would lead, East would follow, the formula for the New World Order. West would invent, East would imitate. West would create, East would build. All of East Asia, whether enthralled with capitalism or communism, had totally succumbed to a foreign vision of the ‘End of History’. With no indigenous spiritual links left, East Asia was devoid of a foundational essence.
Nevertheless, it must be admitted that looking to the White West as the model came with real benefits in the Post-War and Cold War period. The White West had, after all, done so many things right and pretty much created the modern world. Also, white people were proud, confident, patriotic, moral(in the truer sense), and spiritual(with genuine attachment to Christianity). And white progressive idea of justice was about universal values and principles than (1) favoring certain groups, like Jews and blacks or (2) promoting degeneracy as the new holiness, as with globohomo nuttery.
Using such a model, there was much that East Asia and the non-West could gain. Imitating whites meant to be patriotic/nationalistic, moral in family and communal affairs, proud & confident, sensibly race-ist, conscientious, and spiritually rooted. That was the case when whites ruled the West. Upon independence, both India and Singapore admired the Anglo world and sought to learn much from its success.
During the height of the Cold War when Maoism went bonkers, the very existence of Taiwan seemed an oasis of Chinese sanity despite its lack of political sovereignty. While Red Guard youths were rampaging about and smashing just about every vestige of traditional Chinese culture and foreign influence(like classic literature) they could get their hands on, the national museum in Taipei stood as the repository of China’s great treasures(that had been brought over in KMT’s retreat from the mainland).
But times have changed, and now, Taiwan is Cuck Island of the US that has now gone bananas with Jewish gangsterism, Negrolatry, globohomo, and the full-retardation of ‘wokeness’; worse, the US seeks to create a permanent division between China and Taiwan, and no patriotic red-blooded Chinese should tolerate this. But Taiwan as Cuck-Island is full of traitors who ideally should be rounded up and shot.
Anyway, something happened when Jews took over the West, whereby Jews re-characterized and re-coded whiteness into something other. It became redefined in association with guilt, shame, self-loathing, self-debasing self-indulgence, servility toward Jews, cuckery to blacks, and even the celebration of sodomy & globohomo, indeed to the point where the white elites in the West now believe a man in a wig and dress is a ‘woman’.
If the white model had once been beneficial to the non-West, it is now pure poison as a standard for any people or nation. Surely, a non-Western country that aspired to be like France, Britain, Canada, and the US of the 1950s had much to gain. But any people of a non-Western country that imitates current whites(especially the elites) of today will drive their society off the cliff. While extreme white racism could be offensive and nasty, moderate and rational race-ism kept the White World together and was a wonderful model for all the world, i.e. don’t call people ‘wogs’ but don’t let them invade your country and replace your people either.
As Jews sought more than mere success and wealth and set out to conquer, colonize, and control white souls to do the bidding of Zion, whiteness had to be reprogrammed into one of guilt and atonement(as devised by Jews, of course, leading to hypocrisy such as whites denouncing ‘racism’ but then supporting Jewish supremacist demolition of Palestine). Given what has become of whiteness in its current sorry state, the worst thing any people can do today is to emulate it.
As shallow as East Asia was in the post-war order, they gained much by imitating the White World that was still healthily moral(against degeneracy), race-ist & nationalist, and proud. The Japanese were defeated by White America but, in emulating elements of White Americanism, found ways by which Japan too could be proud and wealthy. But today, when the likes of Rahm Emanuel push ‘gay marriage’ on Japan, the formula says, “Look, whites now suck our Jewish dicks and swallow and then turn around and bend over to take them up their arse, and then turn around and get on their knees to suck them stained with their own fecal matter. This is what whites do all over the West. So, what’s stopping you Japanese from doing the same?”
Now, the obvious answer would be, “Because me no horny for Jewish dick”, but East Asia in the post-war era became so accustomed to following and imitating all things Western that even stuff like globohomo and racial self-loathing(based on white self-loathing) is spreading like wildfire over there. According to Jared Taylor, a highly positioned Japanese official was forced to resign because, in a private conversation, he said he’s repulsed by what homos do to one another, which is arse-buggering. It wasn’t even a public statement but ruined his career because he deviated from the script of globohomo. And the childlike South Koreans, once among the biggest converts to Christianity on the basis that it was the religion of the rich and powerful West, are now going through among the fastest de-Christianization around the world because they now worship the new gods of the West, globohomo and diversity. As the still rich and powerful West now worship the new gods put forth by Jews, the shallow and mindless South Koreans do likewise in monkey-see-monkey-do fashion. While Korean Christians and Korean Sodomists may be at loggerheads with one another, they’re the products of the same underlying logic: Both are what they are because they accepted the reigning gods of the West. In the past, it was God and Jesus. Today, it’s Jews, Homos, and Blacks, the new trinity or Tridolatry.
So, could the same happen to China?
To an extent, it has happened already, which is why Xi Jinping’s regime has been trying to clamp down on globohomo trash and sissy-soyboy mania that has gripped Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea. The CCP keeps a cautious eye on Christianity, no longer a true and meaningful religion in the West but a globalist cult(with the Catholic Church led by the Devil Pope pushing Great Replacement on the West), cult worship of Negroes like Fentanyl Floyd, genocidal cucking to the Zionists(and cheering on the mass slaughter of Palestinians), celebration of sodomy(as so many churches now fly the ‘gay’ flag), and other such nonsense.
Even though China remained politically independent, its economy and culture came under the influence of the West(and Westernized East Asian ‘tigers’), the one dominated by Jews & Homos than by Christian Whites and serious-minded people.
Severed from their own roots via neo-confucian futurism, lacking a powerful value system of their own(like Islam), having lost faith in Marxism via the excesses of Maoism, and burnt-out from overwork in the development of China as technopolis, China is a vapid place. Besides, in order to keep the people’s minds off politics, China promoted escapist hedonism imported from or imitative of the degenerate West and its Asian satellites. Though escapist hedonism is often promoted as apolitical, their overall impact is to create a fashion-mindset that can easily be swayed by the latest trends(most of which originate from the globohomo West).
Even though Xi’s China seeks to move away from the cultural hegemony of the West(that infects many Chinese young), it has yet to offer a convincing alternative vision to win the hearts and minds of the new generation(that, by the way, is barely materializing given the birth dearth). That said, Mainland China still shows more promise than Taiwan, Japan, and South Korea that are complete political, cultural, ideological, and economic satellites of the US.
Given the paralysis of ‘democracy’, it would be difficult for the rulers to reverse course in those countries even if inspired figures emerged to save the country. So many people have been ‘empowered’ to defend degeneracy and collaboration with the US that any attempt at greater autonomy in ideas, values, and vision would be met with stiff opposition.
China, at least in theory, has a government with sufficient authority to steer the ship away from the iceberg ahead. Such autocratic powers can be dangerous if misused but given the utter rot of the Western system, it may be the only hope for countries like China, Russia, and Iran.
Democracy is good if it empowers serious and moral people to demand the right thing, but it’s worse than tyranny if the people have been corrupted to demand their own demise. In the US, nearly half the white population has been corrupted into demanding their own racial decline and cultural degeneracy. Granted, the masses are always manipulated by those on top who control the most powerful institutions and industries, and the corrupted populace of the West now ‘freely’ demand cultural rot and racial death. Donald Trump, the supposed patriot and defender of what is good and true, hosted a ‘gay wedding’ at his Mar-a-lago mansion and lauded the codification of ‘gay marriage’. Democracy with such leaders and soul-gutted masses who applaud such things is worse than autocracy or ‘tyranny’ by serious and decent men.
This brings us to the question of democracy vs autocracy, or more accurately, democracy vs sovereignty. Granted, a democratic order can be sovereign, as is certainly the case with Israel that holds elections and is ruled by a set of laws upheld by the power of institutions, but the kind of ‘democracy’ that spread around the world, especially after the end of the Cold War, has mostly been an euphemism for Jewish-Supremacist Globalist puppetry.
Not that the current iteration of Western Democracy is anything to write home about. The West, from the US to Canada to Australia to UK to EU, is essentially the tyranny of Jewish supremacist oligarchy. There are elections but also the lawfare that allows for all kinds of election rigging, as evinced in 2020. The media as the fourth estate is really just part of the Zionist estate. Far from speaking truth to power, it speaks for the Power. The levers of justice, far from being fair and equal in administration of the law, allow for Jewish Supremacists and Zionists to get away with murder while turning a blind eye to the Anti-BDS laws that trample on the US Constitution. ‘Gay marriage’ became the law of the land by judicial fiat by a corrupted court system. And the people were spellbound into embracing globohomo because of the Jewish stranglehold on the media, lawfare courts, and puppet politicians. What now passes for ‘conservatism’ is the whoredom of politicians who take money from Jewish-run casinos. The movie CASINO JACK shows the essence of ‘conservatism’ in the US.
Because white Christians, once the ruling power in the US, totally caved to all things Jewish and Zionist, the rest of the world under the US umbrella is cajoled and compelled to do likewise. After all, what happens in the US(as the lone superpower) must be the template for all the world. Lesson #1 is that the world must take notice that whites have no agency and dutifully do as Jews expect them to. After all, if white Christians, still the majority in the US, were to push back against Jewish Power and its excesses, others around the world might be inspired to do likewise in emulation of defiant White Christian power. But when white Christians, conservatives, and liberals all grovel before Jews, suck the Zionic dong, and even swallow, what is the rest of the world to do? If the Great White Man sucks the Jewish dong, who are YOU to do otherwise?
The US practices a kind of petty imperialism. Not the grand imperialism of the lone superpower as a just and fair-minded policeman of the world but the petty globo-thuggery as the bouncer and hitman for Jewish gangsterism.
In the current situation, if the Japanese were to challenge nefarious Jewish influence on their country, they wouldn’t get any support from white Christian Americans. Instead, White Christian America would suck up to Jews and denounce Japan for its ‘antisemitism’ in failing to suck up to Jewish Power like White America reliably does.
If democracy means a political chemistry based on checks and balances, there is no democracy in the US because it’s Jewish Power all the way regardless of who’s president and which party holds Congress. Jews have been dehumanizing whites forever and keep shoving hot pokers up Donald Trump’s fat arse, but what do we get? We get White Southern boys cucking to Israel even though Jews funded Antifa and BLM to destroy Southern heritage and monuments. And there’s Trump, despite his arse being sore from so many hot pokers shoved into his anus by the Jews, pledging to do more for Israel and egging on Zionists to butcher more Palestinians.
Some democracy! In some ways, the US is as much a Judeo-autocracy as Russia and China are autocracies, the difference being that the Jewish Power has no feelings whatsoever for the goyim they rule over and merely play games with them to manipulate and control. Putin and Xi, for all their faults, can at the minimum be trusted to love their own country and countrymen, but if anyone thinks the likes of Anthony Blinken, Victoria Nuland, Alan Dershowitz, Mayorkas, Elena Kagan, Steven Spielberg, and etc. care about anyone or anything but Jews and Israel, he’s either a numbnut or a cuck-maggot.
With the end of the Cold War, had the US and the West in general sought to genuinely foster democracies around the world, it might have been a great thing. Democracy(or more accurately a republican form of government) done right can be the most ideal form of government. Francis ‘End of History’ Fukuyama described democracy as not just about elections and rule by majority but system of rule of law, basic humanitarian principles, and commitment to individual liberty. If the West had sought to impart such principles and values around the world, it would have done more good than harm.
The Post-Cold War period seemed an ideal time to encourage and promote democracy around the world. Finally, the US could uphold democracy without fear of the other great power(or evil empire) to contend with. The End of History meant that Liberalism had prevailed as the Final Formula for human rights, liberty, dignity, and progress.
During the Cold War, the danger was that democracy could play into the Other Side. Western European countries had powerful communist parties, especially in France and Italy. In the 1960 Italian election, the US military was poised to move in(like the Soviet Union into Hungary in 1956) if the Communist Party were to win. Democratic processes led to governments in Iran and Guatemala that were perceived as either antagonistic to corporate interests or friendly to the Soviet Union. So, the US propped up a puppet-monarch in Iran and toppled the Arbenz government in Guatemala(even though it was moderately socialist and hardly communist). Had free elections been held in Vietnam following the French withdrawal, Ho Chi Minh would have won, not because he was committed to liberal democracy — as a committed communist, he certainly wasn’t — but because he was widely regarded as the foremost patriotic leader in the resistance for national independence. Democratic impulses in Taiwan and South Korea seemed destabilizing at best and subversive at worst, and the US decided it was a safer bet to lend support to strongmen like Chiang and Pak. In the case of Chile, democratic elections led to Salvador Allende’s presidency, seen as a threat to US interests.
Given that the Cold War priority was the preservation of the American sphere of interest to counterbalance the Soviet threat(much exaggerated), the US was willing to de-prioritize democracy in favor of anti-communism, even if it meant the US favored dictators over democracies, especially in Latin America.
Indeed, the US was often loath to promote democracy in Latin American countries lest some Allende-like anti-American leftist come to power. And back then, the US liberal media were often critical of America’s policy in the Global South, more often a case of our-son-of-a-bitch vs commie-son-of-a-bitch than democracy vs dictatorship. Given the US backed so many repressive regimes in Latin America, the media often favored the Cuban experiment as at least producing better results in terms of education, health care, and social stability. Back then, the media often called the US clientele states in Latin America as ‘dictatorships’ that routinely resorted to ‘right-wing death squads’ to keep order. Many in the media had a view of US-Latin-America relations that aligned with Oliver Stone’s vision in SALVADOR and the film UNDER FIRE.
Still, many in the US establishment believed IF the choice was between pro-US dictatorship and the spread of communist influence, the former were preferable. Besides, whereas right-wing dictatorships were only authoritarian, the communists were totalitarian, i.e. the right-wing regimes repressed political dissent but allowed a degree of economic and social freedoms, whereas the leftist regimes of communism controlled every facet of society and the economy.
But with the fall of communism, there was no more danger of countries joining or allying with the Soviet Bloc(or the other superpower). And even the few remaining communist countries, namely Cuba and North Korea, were isolated and no longer meaningful in the geopolitical chess game. That meant the US could finally stop supporting dictatorships or ‘our sons of bitches’ and promote liberal democracy all around the world. The US could also pressure its puppet authoritarian regimes to step down and make way for a transition to democracy, as happened in South Korea, Philippines, and Taiwan. Thus, the US could burnish its reputation as a promoter and defender of freedom all over the world than an enabler of dictators and tyrants. And of course, the communist regimes of Eastern Bloc nations gave way to US-supported agents for democracy. This really seemed like a golden age.
Back then, just about everyone supported the protesters in Tiananmen Square in 1989 as the democratic tide seemed inevitable and unstoppable.
But this democratic project failed in the long run. In one respect, it succeeded in that most of the world is now composed of one kind of democracy or another, or electoral processes in politics. But in another way, it was a tragic failure for several reasons. For democracy to truly work, it has to be a national democracy. Not only must the people be freed from domestic tyranny but the nation has to be freed from foreign domination. But even as the US spread democracy, it didn’t give up its neo-globo-imperial aims and often used promotion-of-democracy to penetrate and infiltrate other countries. With its vast financial resources, power to sanction other countries, cultural/intellectual hegemony via media/academia, and military might, the US de facto installed neo-puppet regimes all over the world.
After all, if ‘democratic’ elections are about whom to vote for, money decides who shall be the candidates and the concentration of media-control shapes mass perceptions. Thus, democracy-promotion turned into a series of color revolutions. Or, given that so many foreign elites came to study in the US, they consciously or subconsciously became the instruments of US hegemony. Is it any wonder that globo-homo spread so far and wide? Thus, more often than not, spread of democracy came to mean a loss of sovereignty and submission to the US.
Another reason for the failure of democracy was the cynicism of the ‘rules-based order’. Francis Fukuyama was correct that a truly functional democracy cannot rely solely on elections and majority rule. Elections can bring to power corrupt or repressive scumbags, and the majority can use elections to favor bigotry, demagoguery, and mindless tribalism. So, regardless of who wins elections, a true democratic order needs powerful institutions that remain committed to the rule of law. All very sound in theory.
But the West distorted and abused this principle to discredit any electoral outcome it didn’t like. For example, when Viktor Orban won the election, the West couldn’t deny the electoral outcome and that it had been fair. But it tried to disparage Orban as an autocrat who disrespected the rule of law. But, such criticism had nothing to do with actual rules or laws but with the displeasure that Orban defied the coercive globalist consensus that ALL Western Democracies MUST open its borders to endless migration-invasion and celebrate Diversity, minimize Christianity, promote GloboHomo, and worsen relations with Russia. So, all the talk of the rules-based-order was purely about hegemony, not principles. Who can deny this when the West says Ukraine stands for ‘liberal democracy’ whereas Hungary represents ‘autocracy’?
And, of course, another reason why the post-cold-war Democracy Project failed was the rise of Jewish oligarcho-tyranny in the West, whereby democracy turned into a mere shell. If the US during the Cold War often disfavored democratic results around the world lest they favor Soviet power/influence, the US after the Cold War often rejected the electoral results in an endless appeasement to the Jews. So, when free and fair elections favored Hamas over Fatah in the Palestinian areas, the US and Israel worked behind the scenes to repel Hamas from the West Bank. Following the Arab Spring when Egyptians freely and fairly elected the Muslim Brotherhood into office, the US supported the military to mow down civilians, depose the democratically elected government, and re-impose martial law. And we know what happened in Ukraine in 2014. Ukraine, of course, is the baby of Jewish gangster globalists.
With the Star of David over the West, the so-called Western Democracy simply became a gangster-fascist empire for Zion. Given the twisted logic of this order, toppling an elected government in Ukraine was for the sake of ‘democracy’ in 2014. And Zelensky the Jewish clown-gangster is the New Churchill, a defender of ‘democracy’ even though he’s clamped down on all opposition, shut down churches, criminalized opposition parties, and suspended elections.
Western Liberal Democracy may have prevailed over communist totalitarianism, but it succumbed to Jewish supremacist tyranny. And in 2020, Jews amply demonstrated that they’re willing to pull any dirty trick to manipulate results, or ‘fortify elections'(like Arnold Rothstein ‘fortified’ the World Series in 1919). (And of course, even Trump, the supposed populist demagogue nationalist, was nothing but a bitch-puppy of the Jews in his term as president. And now, even as Jews pummel his anus, he’s shilling for Israel and threatening the protesters who denounce what’s happening in Gaza).
An honest assessment tells us that the current West is more a theocracy and oligarchy than any kind of democracy. Too many whites worship Jews and are even willing to sacrifice the Constitution to appease Zion-as-god. Look at those GOP cucks trampling all over Free Speech principles in the Bill of Rights to suck up to Jews and have more shekels thrown their way. Look at the entire establishment that worships Anno Sodomini and ‘cancels’ and blacklists anyone who expresses revulsion for homo-fecal-penetration. Look how all those supposedly ‘well-educated’ held up icons of George Floyd, wept like tard-babies, and groveled to wash the stinky feet of Negroes. This isn’t any kind of liberal or secular mentality but a quasi-religious one.
Of course, such a theocratic mindset fosters corruption and degradation. Religion is about faith and worship, which is why God judges but cannot be judged. When Jews, Negroes, and Homos are sacralized and deified, it becomes blasphemous to criticize or judge them. Why, it’d be the cardinal sin of ‘antisemitism’, ‘racism’, or ‘homophobia’.
Now, if those groups were powerless and irrelevant, the sentimentality about them would hardly matter. But, Jews are the most powerful and richest people in the West. Blacks are numerous and possess immense thug-power, the kind that has already destroyed cities like Detroit, Gary, Baltimore, and St. Louis. Indulging blacks only adds fuel to their thug-pathologies; surely, the result of BLM in 2020 was predictable to any honest and rational race-ist.
And homos are deeply entrenched in the arts, media, entertainment, and deep state, in other words in positions of influence. They are vain, narcissistic, and often psychotic. Pretending homos are a bunch of angel-saints can only lead to cultural and social rot. Just look all around since the cancerous spread of globohomo. Even J.K. Rowling found out the hard way. It’s like feeding rats thinking they’ll act nice.
For all those reasons, the Democracy Project that could have triumphed and done so much good for the world was corrupted and debased, and now it’s just a Zionist-CIA-globohomo front to ‘turn the world gay’, like Alex Jones’ frogs.
Then, we can appreciate the pro-Palestinian cause in the West as it’s the first truly democratic and justice-based movement in a long long time. Instead of appeasing Jewish Power, it speaks truth to it. Also, Jews in the movement are showing genuine conscience in their conviction that being Jewish doesn’t automatically justify whatever Jews or Zionists do. Jews too must be accountable. Whatever happened in the Holocaust, it doesn’t make Jews above the law. The movement is also useful in exposing the sheer hypocrisy of the system, not just among the so-called ‘liberals’ but among the so-called ‘conservatives’ who are willing to spit on the Constitution just to win more doggy biscuits from the Jews.
Given the historical trajectory since the end of the Cold War, one may reasonably argue that the Chinese government’s clampdown on the protesters in 1989 was the right thing to do. Not because many of the protesters didn’t have good intentions(as they most certainly did), especially given that the history of the CCP, especially during the Mao Era, was often horrible, but because either (1) the US was cynically exploiting the democratic moment to weaken China(as would happen to Russia in the 1990s) or (2) the US was soon poised to fall into the hands of Jews who corrupted democracy-promotion as a foreign policy game of “Is it good for the Jews?”
We will never know if the Democracy Project would have done better if the Jews hadn’t gained total power over the US — perhaps, White Christian-led America would have been more constructive, helpful, and well-meaning on the global stage — , but once white people in the West betrayed their own democratic and rules-based principles to appease and suck up to Jewish Power(as the new boss in town), spreading democracy around the world came to mean everything-for-Israel and all-goyim-imitate-whites-in-total-cuckery-to-Jews. If that’s democracy, it isn’t the End of History but End of Humanity.
Now, how may the Taiwan conflict play out? Surely, not like past events. Roughly 200 yrs ago, China was humiliated in its defeat in the Opium Wars. About a century later, ill-prepared China clashed with Japan with disastrous results and was bailed out only thanks to the US and Soviet Union smashing Japan.
As we approach the centennial of the Mukden Incident that precipitated Japan’s wholesale entry into Manchuria, the point of contention is Taiwan. As far the Chinese are concerned, Taiwan was part of their civilization even before the United States ever existed. And it fell out of their control only because Japanese Imperialism, aided and abetted by European Imperialists, snatched it from China. After Japan’s defeat, it would have been a part of China but for the Civil War whereby the retreating KMT forces made Taiwan their final bastion, even as it lay claim as the true and sole government over all of China, a boast supported by the US until Richard Nixon’s meeting with Mao and Zhou En-Lai whereby Taiwan was acknowledged as a part of China whose sole legitimate government was in Peking or Beijing.
If the war over Taiwan erupts, two things can happen. It can blow up into a major conflagration or can end quickly with some kind of settlement. It is a war China cannot lose for reasons of history, pride, and world standing. One of the legitimizing myths of the CCP was that it finally made the Chinese people stand up in the world and ended the ‘Century of Humiliation’. As such, the ‘Mandate of Heaven’ of the CCP will be on the line. Even if China doesn’t outright invade and occupy Taiwan, it cannot accept any kind of defeat at the hands of the US. But, it will be no easy feat as the US navy is second to none, has bases all across the Asian Pacific, and can rely on its satellites Japan, South Korea, Philippines, and of course Taiwan. To what extent those Asian nations would want to go all in to support the US is anyone’s guess. Most likely, Japan will be most willing(and it is, of course, the strongest military among the US satellites).
If Japan joins with the US against China, history will have rhymed once again. Back in the late 19th Century, Japan managed to avoid colonization by the West but, for a time, served as its junior partner in the aggression against China, carving it up like a cake. Before Japan came into its own as a power to contend with, it was like a yellow dog imitation-imperialist tagging along the West.
After World War II, Japan experienced for the first time in its history a military occupation by a foreign power, and despite its official end in 1952, Japan has been more or less a military and political colony of the US. Indeed, for all the talk of democracy, the US willfully installed a de facto one-party system in Japan to better serve US hegemonic interests.
If Japan in the Pacific War was an autonomous and sovereign power(albeit committed to insanely hubristic foreign policy), Japan since defeat has been a lapdog and whore of the US. As such, Japan’s role in the China-US conflict over Taiwan will not be as an independent power but as a toady-bitch. And as in the late 19th century, Japan will be siding with a Western power against an Asian country. Back then, Japan joined the European powers against China. Today, Japan is with the US against China. On some level, Japanese never gave up trying to be wanna-be-whites.
If the US sees the conflict as ultimately hopeless, it will let China just take Taiwan without much of a fight. If the US chooses to go all in for Taiwan, it will turn into a major conflict as both China and the US(especially if backed by Japan) possess tons of firepower. But in the end, as China cannot lose this war, it will dig deeper to prevail whereas the US, as in Korea and Vietnam, will likely have to retreat(but after having wreaked a lot of damage). Of course, the best way is to prevent the war altogether. Return to the Nixonian-Kissingerian diplomacy that accepts Taiwan as part of China and agrees to a gradual and peaceful reunification of the two states some time in the future.
But who knows? There are likely plenty of military-industrial-complex types in the US, especially white goyim, who are itching for a war abroad as they’ve been so emasculated at home. After all, even tough-guy white goyim the US are now helpless before Jewish Power, black power, and homo power. They cannot even do anything to stop illegal immigration. As the US is totally dominated by Jews, they must praise Jews even as Jews pee in their mouths and push anti-white ideology. As whites are into Negrolatry and Jungle Fever, white culture is about white guys watching black guys win in sports and hump white girls. Even the US military features jungle fever ads with black guys with white girls. While Negroes burned down cities, white policemen took the knee and bowed their heads. The National Guard cannot even be called up to secure the US borders. So-called ‘conservative’ whites cuck to Jews and would die than be called ‘racist’. White goy ‘tough guys’ in the US military cannot even say No to Globohomo and must salute tranny officers as “ma’am”.
Thus humiliated like dogs at home, castrated and pussified, white goyim feel they must strut their tough guy credentials abroad against nations and peoples who aren’t in the sacralized categories. Jews, blacks, and homos are sacred, but the yellows aren’t. So, to compensate for their total cuckery at home and to regain some of their manhood, these white goy commanders in the US military rattle their sabers at the Chicoms. It’s like dogs that cower before their master excitedly bark and growl at strangers as a safety-valve for their predatory prowess. It also explains why the cowardly white male police are so eager to beat up pro-Palestinian protesters. Having been emasculated and pussifed in the 2020 BLM riots with orders to ‘stand down’, they now get to show their mettle as ‘tough guys’ by throwing people to the ground and clubbing them. But of course, standing down or clamping down, it’s all at the behest of Jewish supremacist gangsterism.
No comments:
Post a Comment