If Pope Francis doesn’t want to judge, why not join a disco than a church? Religion exists to judge, and Christianity is a judgmental religion. If he doesn’t want to judge, he should find a new ‘faith’ or some hobby. But then, Francis really does love to judge. He loves to judge and condemn traditionalists for refusing to bow down to the latest fashions of degeneracy.
1. It has gone from so-called ‘gay rights’ to Gay Rites, a ‘neocracy’ of globohomo-mania as a new object of reverence, rapture, and worship. While the West is becoming irreligious(in the waning of traditional faith), there’s a neo-theocracy or ‘neocracy’ of satanism with Sodomania and Tranny-scendence as the highest value, along with Magic Negro Cult and Holy Jew Worship. Idolatry is the new faith, with its adherents foaming at the mouth in their faddish fanaticism.
From its inception to around the new millennium, the ‘gay’ agenda was marketed as a secular and ‘rational’ movement in favor of individual rights, i.e. some individuals are homo, and they have rights as individuals to practice homo-fecal-penetration and be what nature made them to be.
But then, the ‘gay’ agenda(or globohomo or queertianity) became the official policy of statism: Government and politicians must either observe, celebrate, and praise homosexuality OR keep their mouths shut if deficient in requisite enthusiasm. At the very least, they must NOT oppose the agenda as it would displease the Jews who control both political parties, big media, and the deep state. Finally, we now see globo-homo nuttery being pushed into houses of worship. We’ve reached the point where the hope of American ‘conservatives’, Donald Trump, proudly hosted a ‘gay wedding’ at his estate Mar-a-Lago with almost no pushback from the weeny MAGA base.
The Agenda is no longer secular but neo-theocratic or ‘neocratic’. Indeed, given its success, it’s past being an agenda and is the de facto state religion of the ruling elites who’ve replaced Jesus with the Jewish-promoted homo anus as the holiest symbol of civilization.
In our time, churches and temples fling their gates wide open to the worship of satanism. And Jews turned the Holy Land into Sodom and Gomorrah, and we must praise the fact that Israel annually(and anally)has one of the biggest ‘gay’ parades in the world. Furthermore, even non-homo things now seek blessing via ‘christening’ or ‘limp-wristening’ via globo-homo symbolism/ritualism. Want to make your dog or sports team more special? Wrap it in globohomo colors.
Sign says ALL ARE WELCOME but of course decent people who refuse to celebrate Homo-Fecal-Penetration and Tranny-Penis-Cutting are NOT welcome in this neo-satanist church gone rotten. More like All Are Well-Cum.
2. Jews were the main force behind globo-homo. Anyone who denies this fact is either ignorant, dishonest, or cowardly. It was a ploy by which Jews reinforced minority-elite-supremacism. As homos are minorities all around the world, any society that puts homos on a pedestal effectively ends up favoring the minority over the majority. It complements Jewish minority-supremacist power. People who bow down before minority-homos are made more likely to bow down before minority-Jews. Also, as homos are alienated from their own societies, they make ideal fifth-column collaborators of Jewish Globalist Power. Jewish Power coddles and bribes them, and they do the bidding of the Empire of Judea.
Welcome to Anno Sodomini
3. Jews hated Christianity for historical reasons — ‘antisemitism’ and the smuggling of the Jewish God to the goyim — and ideological reasons, as the Church remained the bastion of conservative values. The church was, at one time, the main force against globo-homo and other forms of decadence, depravity, and degeneracy, often pushed by Jews.
Jews figured on two ways to deal with the challenge. Bring down the church and discredit it with salacious scandals, mocking caricatures, and secular arguments. Or change it from the inside. Turn the church into a manger for globo-homo, thereby eroding any effective force against the ‘gay’ agenda, especially as secular ‘conservatives’ only cater to power and money, sucking up to anyone on top — notice that once rich Jews told GOP to stop opposing globo-homo, ALL Republicans followed suit.
Jews know that christianity gone globo-homo is spiritually dead. No sane religion celebrates sodomy and tranny-penis-cutting in its houses of worship. The fact that so many people(especially ‘educated’ people) in the West will approve of christianity ONLY IF it embraces the ‘gay’ agenda is proof that they put sodomy and tranny-vanity over God and Jesus. They don’t expect homos and trannies to repent and atone before God and Jesus(and Allah and Muhammad). Instead, they expect Divinity to bow down to the fad-fanaticism of the day. In other words, divinity now exists to flatter the deviancy of sexual perverts.
Jewish Satanism and Homo Vanity demands that the Christian God and Jesus cater to the narcissism of sexual deviancy.
4. The character of any institution is ultimately decided more by personnel than principles. There is nothing in the teachings of Christianity that would celebrate sinners and sodomy. Jesus opened His heart to everyone, even murderers and rapists, but on condition that they seek repentance and redemption.
So, all this globo-homo stuff has nothing to do with church doctrine or principles. But then, the fate of any institution is decided by its members. If satanists take over the church, it will become satanist even if it remains nominally Christian and features frescos of Jesus on the wall. If capitalists take over a communist government, it will practice capitalism. If communists take over a capitalist industry, they will run it along communist lines. If the Supreme Court is taken over by radicals or Jewish supremacists, it will do away with free speech, gun rights, and freedom of assembly EVEN IF those are guaranteed in the Constitution.
People of Power(POP) decide, not core principles. So, if the Catholic church is taken over by globo-homo types, it becomes effectively ‘sodomitic’ regardless of the church doctrine since time immemorial. Then, it’s no wonder that ‘muh constitution’ types are benighted and clueless. They believe laws and policies are secured by principles. No, it’s the Power that decides. Jews took over US institutions and used their power to shut down BDS, suppress free speech, persecute political enemies, and promote Zionic supremacism, all of which don’t flow from the Constitution but are nevertheless enforced because Jews got the power to favor lawfare over the rule of law. They even passed ‘gay marriage’ through the Supreme Court. Where is that in the Constitution? Where does it say marriage can be redefined to accommodate and flatter sexual deviancy and perversion? (Using SCOTUS logic, incest or same-family marriage should also be allowed.) People of Power or POP can just pull stuff out of the thin air or out of their arse. It’s like Stalin had the power to make a pact with Hitler even though it went against communist principles. In this sense, fascism has a better understanding of how power really works. Power itself is the ‘principle’ of history.
5. If the masses were at odds with the elites, the People of Power or POP would have more difficulty doing as they please. In other words, even if all the institutions were pro-homo, the Power would be up against popular opposition to the agenda(of something like ‘gay marriage’). Popular will, however, especially in the age of mass media and public education, is a plaything for the People of Power who churn out the pop culture that selects and favors certain issues and agendas and, furthermore, decides which images and idols shall colonize the mass mind. Jews have control over mass culture and pushed ‘gay’-as-angel iconography to the masses. As most people are sheeple, they fell for it like children fall for Santa. So, Jews got elite power and control mass-passion, or ‘massion’.
Similarly, on the eve of the Cultural Revolution, Mao had the authority and means to whip the young ones into mass hysteria. In the West, Jews got the Stalin-or-Mao-like power. No wonder then that conzos usually caved and resigned themselves to “Muh Israel” and “Gay Marriage is now a conservative value.”
6. There are two kinds of people. The Easies and the Hards. The Easies are push-overs. Easily molded by public education, advertising, fads & fashion, state propaganda, and political correctness. Most ‘liberals’ today are Easies. They are so easy to influence, so receptive to the latest manias. They are trusting of elite institutions, status-conscious, and conceitedly partial to anything packaged as ‘new’, ‘radical’, ‘hip’, ‘cool’, and/or pro-‘social justice’.
So, if the Power says a man can be a ‘she’ or even a ‘they’, the Easies go along without thought(or what masquerades as thought with rote slogans and pseudo-intellectual jargons). As even plenty of higher-IQ ‘liberals’ have fallen for the scam, Easiness is less a matter of IQ than of self-sense and conviction. Easies have weak individual sense, racial consciousness, core values, and/or awareness of culture/roots. If at least one’s disconnect from roots and core values was compensated with a strong sense of individuality and criticality, one would be so easy to manipulate. As a free thinking individual, he would be skeptical and keep asking questions. At the very least, he won’t fall for every fad and fashion out of anxiety or approval because he would trust himself to search for the answers.
Unfortunately, today’s so-called ‘liberals’ not only have been uprooted but denied individuality and criticality, rendering them so ‘easy’ to any fad/fashion. Devoid of true individuality, they latch onto the judgmental emotionalism of PC. ‘Easy’ connotes tolerance, taking-it-easy, and live-and-let-live attitude(the kind in the movie DAZED AND CONFUSED), but today’s Easies are instantly ‘triggered’ by whatever that doesn’t jibe with their indoctrination and ‘idolatration'(the process of instilling idol-worship).
The so-called ‘wokeness’ is a contradictory phenomenon. Ideologically, it is flimsy and keeps mutating into ever sillier formulations. And yet, its minions are among the most puritanically rabid. How could they be SO SURE about an ‘ideology’ or idol-driven-ideology(or ‘idology’) that is changing all the time, often contradicting itself, and/or going from one outrage to another at breakneck speed? One moment, the all-consuming outrage is over ‘those poor immigrants’. Next, NOTHING matters more than the celebration of ‘gays’. Then, it’s all about the Noble Negroes and ‘systemic racism’, as if those issues must command our attention 24/7/365. Then, it’s about trannies. Then, it’s Me-Too and feminism(even though the ‘liberal’-dominated pop culture has pornified womanhood).
People who once would have scoffed at the notion of Bruce Jenner as a ‘woman’ are suddenly SO SURE that he is one, and YOU BETTER AGREE or else you’re a ‘transphobe’ who must be fired, purged, and blacklisted. So much conviction with so little consistency. How could this be?
It’s because ‘wokeness’ is essentially amnesiac. It instills people with a righteous sense of outrage but without roots/heritage and/or individuality/criticality. Conservatives argue for roots/heritage, for values with deep historical and spiritual pedigree. Classical liberals and libertarians argue for a strong sense of individuality. ‘Wokeness’ rejects both(as ‘reactionary’ or ‘uncommitted’) and calls for Collective Outrage over the latest ‘injustice'(to be selected by the Power). ‘Woke’ minions are game for such nonsense because they have weak roots and weak sense of self. (Their trashy narcissism and vanity are not to be confused with a strong sense of individuality that doesn’t require constant flattery from others for validation. The whole insistence on pronouns among the gender-looney suggests a pathological lack of confidence that needs to be assuaged by forcing others to comply with their delusions. As for normal-sexual people who go along with this charade by listing their all-too-obvious pronouns — he/him or she/her — , it’s a sign of their ideological vapidity, always eager for confirmation and approval from the powers-that-be.) The ‘woke’ are neither like Patrick Buchanan(strong roots) nor Ayn Rand(powerful individuality).
However one may feel about Buchanan, he undoubtedly has a deep sense of tradition and heritage to lend meaning to his life. Whatever one thinks of Ayn Rand, she believed in the power of the individual to think for himself/herself. She refused to agree with anyone for the sake of acceptance or approval.
Lacking either quality, the ‘woke’ minions harbor outrage than true passion. Theirs is a fashion-passion of amnesia conforming to the latest fads. Like a swarm of locusts carried by ever shifting winds, the ‘woke’ fall upon and feed on whatever field of outrage they’re flung into.
Since the late 1980s, Political Correctness molded generations that are not only ‘Easy’ but Queasy, i.e. easily molded by the powers-that-be into feeling queasy about whatever deemed ‘incorrect’ or ‘unacceptable’. They are the neo-puritans as the current ‘woke’ ideology(or ‘idology’) is actually more a mindless idolatry of Jews, homos, and blacks, thus a kind of Tri-Supremacism.
If Political Correctness in its vanguard role mandated what mustn’t be said, ‘wokeness’ in its overarching mission is to decree what must be said(or chanted in unison).
It should be obvious by now that ‘wokeness’ isn’t truly leftist, egalitarian, or progressive. It is about the supremacism of Jews and whatever Jews prefer uber alles. PC-addled Easy-Queasies are like dogs. Notice dogs can be made to bark and bite at ANYTHING by their master. A dog that is gentle with a rabbit can be instantly made to tear it to pieces. A dog’s agency is always outsourced to its master. Its emotion of servitude to the master overrides all other considerations. Even though most Jews claim to be ‘liberal’, they themselves are not easy-queasy. If anything, they push the Easy-mentality on the goyim because, deep down inside, they themselves are Hard-minded about their own tribal identity and interests. Jewishness is hardcore tribal supremacism wrapped in ‘liberal’ clothing.
The Easy-Queasies hate the Hards. If Easies have clay-minds readily molded by Jewish Hands, the Hards are hard-hats, tougher to crack. Some are hard due to a rather dogmatic rootedness in heritage or tradition. People like Buchanan are true Catholics with a deep sense of church history and values. They won’t cower to the latest fad or outrage for approval from the ruling class and the easily swayed mobs.
Others are hard for reasons of individual pride. They believe that right-or-wrong and good-vs-bad must be a matter of individual reasoning and conviction. It shouldn’t be decided by popular outrage or political pressure. These individuals may disagree with one another, but each of them is Hard in that he is resolved to reason things out for himself than bow to pressure from above or below(or from their peers).
No wonder Jewish Power values the Easies and detests the Hards. Easies are easy to control, whereas the Hards have their own ideas rooted in tradition or individuality.
Of course, there are Hard-Tards as well, such as moronic Creationists or the ‘god hates fags’ crowd who simply refuse to honestly grapple with the science of evolution or homosexuality. Being dogmatic or stubborn for the hell of it isn’t a good way to be Hard.
There are also the Hard-Lards, those who seem to be Hard but are actually all talk and no walk. All those ‘right-wing’ talk show hosts sure talk big but usually fold when push comes to shove. Donald Trump is hard-lard. He acts and talks tough but usually caves to every fashion and to the Jews who hate him. ‘Muh Israel’.
Generally speaking, Hards are usually better than the Easies, though there are times of emergency when it’s imperative to make the great majority ‘easily’ fall in line or behind some major cause. And even though Hardness is currently more a right-wing or conservative trait, it isn’t necessarily so. In an extremely conservative order, the Easies are the conservative folks, the overwhelming majority, who ‘easily’ fall in line with the reigning dogma and dominant narrative. In such an order, it is the liberal who is hard-minded in his insistence on thinking independently or listening to the views, ideas, and narratives from sources disapproved by the authority. While most conservatives in such an order ‘easily’ stick to the supposedly tried-and-true(or traditional), the liberal takes on the harder and more difficult challenge of thinking outside the box.
In the current order, however, conservatives face the harder challenge and more difficult path. Granted, one could argue that true liberals face the hardest task as the current order is far from liberal(in the genuine sense) and really operates on establishmentarian dogmatism. For example, acknowledging that homosexuals exist and letting them do their own thing is liberal. But elevating homos and trannies on a pedestal as the favored idols/icons of society and then ‘canceling’ or blacklisting anyone who doesn’t go along is NOT liberal, though it’s often called that(or ‘leftist’, which is ludicrous). Glenn Greenwald, more or less a true liberal, defends free speech against both the Democrats and Republicans(who, for all their kvetching about Cancel Culture, will easily censor or blacklist anyone who displeases the Zionists whom the GOP caters to for more shekels and blessings).
In the current order of rootlessness, degeneracy, and frivolity, most people are ‘liberal’ Easies, or Easy-Queasies given their mental-weaning on ‘wokeness’. They’re NPC clones of Will Stancil or Steven Bonnell(aka Destiny). If liberals of the past in a conservative order had to make an effort to think and live freely, today’s so-called ‘liberals’ are herd-critters who stampede from one fad to the next, from one outrage to the next. They are so easily led by the nose(which may explain the popularity of nose-rings).
If conservatives in a conservative order ‘easily’ stuck with the reigning customs and dogma, in the current order they need to resist and make an effort not to blindly go along with the crowd on the latest craze. Thus, they are, along with true liberals, the Hards in the current order. Of course, the difference between a true liberal and a conservative is that the former is always ‘hard’ in tirelessly resisting the temptation of the Power(of any ideology) to censor and control thought, whereas today’s conservatives could easily turn ‘easy’ if they could have their preferred order. Andrew Torba of GAB, for instance, is now part of the ‘hard’ crowd given the reigning ideology of Jewish Supremacism and its proxy of ‘wokeness’, but, being a theocrat at heart, his Christian-National order, if realized, would make things easy for people like himself while making it hard for everyone else.
WHY JEWS PUSH GAY MARRIAGE – Brother Nathanael
No comments:
Post a Comment