In the past, blacks gained via cultural crossbreeding with whites. Whites also gained this way, especially in music. Charlie Parker and Miles Davis both had extensive knowledge of white and/or modern music. James Baldwin read extensively the classics of Western Lit. There was little race-mixing back then. The dynamics of racial mixing then was cultural and intellectual.
Nowadays, blacks don't care much about white culture. The attitude ranges from blissful indifference to toxic hostility bordering on phobia. Everything white is 'racist' or has something to do with 'white privilege'. Or, it is 'sexist' or 'homophobic', amusing coming from nonwhites because all human societies, white and nonwhite, have been mostly 'sexist' and 'homophobic' by today's insane standards.
But then, many whites don't care about white culture either. Raised on insta-thrill pop culture centered around rap, superhero movies, videogames, and pornification of just about everything(even kiddie culture at Disney), a lot of white kids haven't the patience or curiosity for anything that requires some effort and commitment. Or, they've been indoctrinated that Western Civilization is 'racist'. And yet, because of the undeniable greatness of the West, there is the OTHER agenda of blackening it. It used to be 'Hey Hey Ho Ho, Western Civ has got to go', but we increasingly hear, 'Hey Hey Ho Ho, Western Civ was Negro'. Not only are there theories that Ludwig van Beethoven was black but even clearly white historical figures, male and female, are increasingly depicted as black by Jewish-and-Cuck-run media. British queens, Finnish heroes, Roman generals, and etc. have been presented as black.
Maybe Robert E. Lee will be rehabilitated if he's presented as black while the slaves are made white. The 'Hamilton'-ization of history. Then, maybe blacks and progs will feel, "Black Robert E. Lee was a great man for fighting to defend an institution that enslaved all those evil racist honkeys who deserved no freedom." What blacks denounce as 'racist' is suddenly cool if the great white man/woman is made black. And white cucks and even conzos seem to embrace this. Maybe they figure it's the only way to save Western Civ. Any great white figure in history or culture can instantly go from 'punkass lowlife racist honkey mofo' to 'badass supercool dude' IF black-faced. Maybe it will even impact Neo-Nazis who decide to make Hitler black.
Anyway, if cultural crossbreeding of yesteryear is gone due to black self-absorption and decline of serious appreciation of culture and ideas, it seems the only way left for blacks to gain from whites is via miscegenation. The hell with white ideas and culture. Rather, hump the white ho and appropriate white genes(pertaining to higher IQ and attractiveness) for the black race. After all, the product of white/black mixing is considered fully black than half-black/half-white. No one called Obama a half-black president. No one called Tiger Woods a quarter-black golfer. And this is gaining steam because race-mixing is considered as 'progressive'. But is it really?
Actually, race-mixing isn't leftist or anything new. It's older than the oldest profession of prostitution. The fate of Neanderthals can attest to that. Men like to pork anything, the age-old tradition of victors taking the women of the vanquished. This is why white folks got some Neanderthal genes. Cro-Magnons defeated and destroyed the Neanderthals but porked their women as sexual trophies. So, race-mixing isn't anything new but a weapon and product of war, invasion, conquest, oppression, domination, and humiliation. And what is happening today between whites and blacks is just another chapter in this power struggle of winners and losers, not of equals.
Were the Ancient Egyptians 'progressive' or 'leftist' for taking women of defeated tribes for sexual pleasure? Were the Romans 'progressive' or 'leftist' for having done the same? Were Arabs 'progressive' for having used white slave women as sex objects? Were the Moors 'leftist' for having humiliated Southern Europeans by race-mixing with white women? Were the Ottoman Turks 'progressive' for having used Greek girls(and boys) as sexual trophies? Were the Mongols 'leftist' for having sexually exploited all the peoples they conquered? Did Persian and Russian rejoice over this 'liberation' by the Golden Horde? Were the Spanish Conquistadors a bunch of 'leftist progressives' for having forced race-mixing on the brown natives of the Americas? Were Southern slave-owners 'leftist' for having sexually exploited black slave women? Were US troops 'leftist' for having turned the women of Vietnam into a whores for the US military? (If memory serves me right, it was the Viet Cong that was considered leftist in that struggle.) So, there is nothing that is intrinsically leftist or progressive about race-mixing. The history of race-mixing has been mostly brutal, aggressive, and humiliating(especially for the men of the losing side).
Now, there is a way race-mixing could be construed as leftist or progressive. The universal strain of leftism may argue that all men and women are brothers and sisters under the skin. Therefore, the ideal is for all of mankind to acknowledge one another's humanity and shared destiny and fall in love regardless of race and skin color or whatever. A colorblind coming together of the races based on the global union of the heart.
But is this what is happening? No. The fact is Jungle Fever isn't colorblind but color-bound because black men associate white women with more attractive features and because white women associate black men with more muscle and bigger dongs. It's about ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs premised on BAMMAMA, or Blacks-Are-More-Muscular-and-More-Aggressive. It's about black sexual imperialism, conquest, and colonization of the white race. There was a time when genuinely leftist Jews(though they could have been disingenuous back then) pushed the notion that all races are essentially alike apart from skin color. Especially Jews who grew up under communist parents seem to believe this. David Horowitz was one, but in the Sixties and Seventies, he couldn't help realize that blacks were about thug-muscle power and felt hostility toward geek lefty Jews. Blacks cynically exploited Jewish idealism whereas Jews, for all their smarts, were blind to the actuality of racial dynamics. In the book DESTRUCTIVE GENERATION, the story of Fay Stender, a Jewish leftist lawyer who defended black criminals and had sex with them, suggested that there were racial-sexual dynamics between Jews and blacks that went beyond common cause based on ideology.
Since then, Jewish Leftism has pretty much vanished. Almost no Jew accepts Marxist theory of anything. No Jew of any consequence is a communist, or even a real humanist. Most Jews who matter know privately that race does matter and that racial equality is just a pipe-dream. Most Jews now regard themselves as superior and deserving to rule over dumb and/or weak-willed goyim(like the 'darn tootin' guy in FARGO). If Jews carry on with the proggy-sounding agenda of 'anti-racism'(in a world where they instigate wars and crises in which Zionists are favored and countless Arabs are pushed through the meat grinder), it is only to guilt-bait whites into cucking and sucking up to Jewish Supremacists. The current prog-agenda isn't to defeat all forms of supremacism but to sustain Jewish supremacism by labeling any hint of white autonomy and agency as 'white supremacist'. Bait-and-Switch.
Indeed, this is why today's race-mix propaganda is so different from that of yesteryear. In a movie like Stanley Kramer's GUESS WHO BE COMING TO DINNER?, the white girl hardly notices that she's hooked up with a NEGRO! She just goes on and on about his fine character and social status as successful doctor. So, it's all about content of character or some such. It's not about Jungle Fever but a sexual version of TO SIR WITH LOVE, with Sidney Poitier reliably playing the capable and upstanding Negroid.
Fast Forward to today, and the message is clearly race-conscious, or Jungle Feverish. It's not about color-blind unity of the races but how white women should go with black men because they are superior to white men in manhood. It's essentially the Saigonization of the white race. In Saigon during the war, Vietnamese women were turned into whores and sexual property of the conquering white and black soldiers whereas Vietnamese males' roles were as cucks, collaborators, and coolies. Today, this dynamics is pushed all across America. Robin DiAngelo's stuff about White Fragility is just BS. We know she has Jungle Fever(and most white men have Cuckitis).
The massive race-mixing in the US isn't part of anything new. It's not 'leftist' or 'progressive' but continuation of the age-old racial dynamics of the conquering race taking the women of the loser race. Whites may be smarter than blacks, but that doesn't matter because Jews are smarter than whites. With their money and power of persuasion(with sticks and carrots), smarter Jews have pressured smart whites into worshiping dumb but stronger blacks. If there's only Bob and Billy, and if Bob is smarter than Billy, Bob will likely control Billy, even if Billy is stronger. Brains often wins over brawn. But if there's also Bruce and if Bruce is smarter than Bob, and if Bruce favors Billy over Bob, Bob too will end up favoring Billy over himself because smarter Bruce insists it be so. And that is where the US is at today. If there were no Jews in the US, whites would be better positioned vis-a-vis blacks. Whites would use their smarts to come up with best ways to control blacks. But because Jews are smarter than whites and effectively control white minds, if Jews say, "Blacks are holy whereas whites are assholy, therefore whites must kiss black ass for redemption", plenty of whites go along in obedience to Jews with the prestige of higher IQ.
Today's race-mixing isn't about colorblind coming together of the races. Rather, it's about power and preferences. Jewish and black power prefer white women, and white men just accept their lot as cuck-losers and not only shut up but CELEBRATE Shtetl Fever and Jungle Fever as the greatest thing since sliced bread.
Even though the power-dynamics have changed drastically in the US, the public discourse still carries on with outdated paradigm of 'white supremacism' or 'systemic racism'. This is especially so because Jewish Power has yet to rear its head as the true master of New America, and white morons, cucked and craven, don't have the guts to spell out the nature of the new reality. The effect is downright surreal. We have the Jewish supremacist overclass forcing white cuck-elites to carry on with the charade that the US is ruled by 'white supremacists' who must be resisted in order to create a society of greater 'equity' and 'inclusion'. If so, how about including some Palestinian-Americans in Joe Biden's Jewish-packed government? How about some real talk of equity between Jews who grow ever richer and goyim who grow ever poorer? Super-rich Jewish Supremacists control all the institutions and industries with supremacist sway over us, but we are supposed to believe that the 'supremacist' threat comes from truck drivers and lower-middle class & working class whites who call for fair elections.
The current race-mixing propaganda is about dominating, humiliating, and erasing the white race. It's about the white race reduced to a mere prize or trophy. Like horses, or canines at a dog show. The race-mix message is that White Beauty now belongs to Jews who got all the money and blacks who got the glory as rap stars, athletes, and studs. In other words, Jews and blacks are active agents of power. Jews are in the game of money and influence. Blacks are in the game of celebrity and sports. As white males lost to Jews in the brain-game and lost to blacks in the brawn-game, they should accept their loser-dom. They no longer deserve to keep white women as racial possessions. No, white women are for sale or up for grabs as trophies and prizes for the real winners of America, Jews and blacks.
Trophy or Prize is coveted but passive, not active. Athletes are active. Winners take the trophy. Men in business and institutions are active in the struggle for power. Jewish message is clear. Jews and blacks are active as competitors in the power-grab. Whites, especially white women, are merely passive as trophies. If white men want to play an active role, it must as 'assists' to Jews and blacks, much like Sikhs were sidekicks to the British Imperialists. Active in assistance, not resistance, that is the Rule for Whites according to Jews. No wonder Jewish 'conservatives' tell whites that the Critical Race Theory(pushed by 'progressive' Jews) isn't anti-white but just anti-something-or-the-other. Jews of all stripes feel they must snuff out any spark of white consciousness. Both 'progressive' and 'conservative' Jews insist that white activism must be to ASSIST than RESIST Jewish Supremacism. So, while Jews tirelessly call for RESISTANCE to 'white supremacist' MAGA, whites are supposed to embrace ASSISTANCE to Jewish Power. Even when Jews ravaged Trump's presidency, what did the orange-man clown do? He pardoned Jewish crooks.
Jewish supremacist race-mix message is as follows: "You white guys lost to us in mental power and lost to blacks in muscle-power. So, just be a bunch of dweeby cucks while your women come over to us as our trophies." This is NOTHING NEW. It's the same sexual dynamics of age-old imperialism and conquest. It is like when Spanish men sexually conquered native brown women or when US neo-imperialist G.I.'s turned Vietnam into one big race-mixing whore-house. It's just that the Saigonization is now happening to the white race. This is what the removal of Robert E. Lee statues and Confederate monuments are all about. And there is hardly any resistance from Southern Whites, especially as white men down there are also cucked in their mindless worship of black-dominated college football where Negroes take white women.
This is especially so as Jews pegged the New Morality to idolatry than idealism, a policy as profoundly eventful as the creation of the Petro-Dollar where oil was fixed to the value of the dollar. If the Petro-Dollar meant Oil = US currency, the creation of the Jewgromo(Jewish-Negro-Homo)-Dollar meant Jews, Negroes, Homos = Morality and Spirituality. Moral Currency has been pegged to Jews, blacks, and homos. It isn't about all races bound by same rules and being judged by the same yardstick but about some groups being intrinsically precious whereas others are innately tainted. So, celebrating blacks even as blacks burn down cities and beat up innocent people is deemed 'moral'. Praising Jews and Israel to high heaven even as Jews spread terror and mayhem all across the Middle East and Ukraine is deemed 'moral'. Celebrating homos and trannies even as they turn mainstream culture into one big degenerate infestation is deemed 'moral'. Never mind what these groups do. Whatever they do must be right because their very identities have been pegged to moral righteousness and spiritual sanctity. As a result, the white race isn't merely sexually cucked but spiritually cucked to Jews and blacks(and homos).
Of course, there is ONE way white males can gain some holy 'woke' points but it is as homos who take dongs(often black, as with Andrew Sullivan) up their bungs or as trannies in flowery dresses and pretend to be 'women' despite the hairy chest, pud, and balls. (Jews will favor white male trannies over women because they tend to favor deviant-minority over any natural majority, seek to undermine morale-boosting moral clarity among goyim, and insist that reality is what Jews say it is regardless of any objective truth. Anyone who can make others accept 2 + 2 = 5 despite the obvious truth of 2 + 2 = 4 has awesome power indeed.. like the overlords behind Big Brother Cult in Orwell's 1984.)
Great article.
ReplyDeleteOnly thing I'd argue, & judging by the rest of your article I think you already understand this, you've just overlooked it, is that leftism/progressivism in itself is a genuine ideological manifestation of the very conquest you're describing.
The roots of leftism in the West are jewish racial interests (initially driven & still dominated by jews, but also naturally beneficial to other non-Whites) & capitalist interests (mostly jewish in itself & heavily influenced by the financial system they control, but not exclusively, & can be pushed by rich, greedy Whites & other races as well).
The influence of leftism over the Western world has risen directly in proportion of the gradual & total conquest of the Western world by jews & money power. Leftism is simply internationalist indoctrination crafted to the benefit of jews & money power.
It's just that the true purposes of leftism is concealed out of necessity. Out of necessity because the aim is to get the majority population to support beliefs & actions that go against their own interests. Hence you get mass indoctrination phrases like "equity & equality". "diversity is our strength", & "we're all one race" & social controls like "racist" & "sexist", rather than something like "we want to exploit your nation & destroy your race", which would be far more truthful, but would instantly result in resistance & wouldn't be able to take off in the first place.
But the more power they've obtained & the more they feel confident in this power, the more they're sticking the boot in & the less they're able to control their outright disdain towards White people & their lust to dominate us. Even among White normies, White normies who don't have the slightest clue about what's going on, White normies who still believe that Whites control everything under a "White supremacist power structure" & that promoting their own racial interests is "evil". Even these White normies are waking more & more to an increasing hostility towards them & are starting to resist it, & the more this occurs, the more they'll break out of the mental prison they live under & start to explicitly take their own side.