Some geopolitical strategists fear that China’s rise in the 21st century will mirror the dramatic rise of Germany and Japan in the late 19th century and first half of the 20th century. Perhaps, it’s a misplaced fear. Such assurance may seem counter-intuitive because China is so much bigger and more populous than Germany and Japan. Paradoxically, however, China might be less dangerous than Japan and Germany precisely because it is a bigger nation. Being huge in land mass and population in its own right, China may be satisfied with what it has. It surely wants to expand trade with the world, but China doesn’t need to conquer or control other nations to be a great power. It doesn’t need an empire because it is an empire-sized nation.
Same could be said for Russia. Its gigantic size and limitless resources ensure its place in the world as an important player. While Russians are underachievers, Russia doesn’t need more territory to be one of the great powers of the world.
In contrast, the reason why Japan and Germany became so problematic was the discrepancy between their ambitions(in will and ability) and their limitations(in land and resources). If both had been content to be normal nations, they would have accepted their prescribed place in the world. But modern Germany looked to Great Britain and France as models, moderate-sized nations that became world powers by amassing empires. Unlike the US and Russia that could be great on their own due to abundant geography and sizable & growing demography, France and Great Britain couldn’t be great on their own. They needed to control the seas and other lands.
Germans perceived themselves to be a capable, even superior, people, and felt deserving of greatness too, and that meant Germany needed an empire of its own.
As for Japan, its rapid rise filled them with confidence and then hubris. Especially after the great naval victory in the Russo-Japanese War, they began to feel they could overcome all odds. But like Germany, Japan had limited land mass and resources that could feed and supply only so many people. On its own, it could be a regional power but not a great power. Especially after observing the miserable failures of China, Japan saw itself as the rightful master-ruler of Asia.
Now, if China had modernized at the same time and at the same pace as Japan in the 19th century, then it would also have developed as an industrial power, and then, Japan would have had no choice but to acknowledge China as the dominant power in Asia. It would have been less likely for Japan to develop an over-sized national ego from the perception of China as the Sick Man of Asia. In its encounter with the West, China was slow to modernize whereas Japan did so almost overnight. Flush with power and success, Japan was determined to remain ahead of China as the main power of Asia. Back then, Japan was much smaller than China but much stronger, and China was much bigger than Japan but much weaker. This contradiction led to the great war between the two nations. It was like a fit and feisty small guy taking on a flabby and feeble big guy. Japan as the tough small guy was the better fighter but couldn’t deliver a KO blow to a guy who was too big despite his sickness. At any rate, because Japan could only be a great power by having an empire, it was desperate to gain more territory and clashed with other empires and eventually was crushed by the combined might of the Allies.
Well that was then, this is now. China now has both a bigger economy and bigger military than Japan. The bigger nation has the bigger power, and so, the geopolitical dynamics in Asia is more normal as it’s only natural that the bigger nation should be more powerful. Indeed, for most of Asian history, Japan had always acknowledged China as the main power in the region, and that recognition had been the basis of peace between them as well as with other Asian nations.
Now, will the newly risen China feel tempted to act like Japan in the first half of the 20th century? Flush with wealth and might, will it aggressively seek to gain hegemony over all of Asia and maybe the world? Will it be like Militarist Japan x 10? It’s unlikely because China doesn’t need more land and more people to be a great power. China can be a great power with what it has within its borders. Thus, its ambitions are limited to coastal areas. China has no territorial ambitions in other parts of the world. Also, it has enough problems within its own borders, especially with Tibetans and Uighurs. The last thing it needs is more ethnic conflicts.
So, which people will be the main menace to world peace and geopolitical stability? The main problem lies with the Jews because their Contradiction of Power is the most radioactive by far. What is the essence of this contradiction? Jews are rich in money and influence but poor in numbers(demographics). The result is a Jewish neurosis composed of equal measures of megalomania and paranoia.
Just think. Jews are more powerful than the Chinese, Hindus, Russians, Anglos, Germans, Japanese, French, and Iranians, but there are far fewer Jews than the populations of major gentile nations. Japan has over 110 million, Germany has 80 million, Russia has 125 million, etc. In contrast, there are only 13 million Jews in the world. And their nation, Israel, is a tiny speck in the Middle East. Jewish super-power owes to Jews controlling US(the most powerful nation on earth), UK, Canada, and the EU, but their influence hangs in the balance of White Submissivism, i.e. unless white gentiles continue to remain servile and defer to Jews, Jewish Power can collapse overnight.
This is why Jews are so fearful of the slightest whiff of White Identity & Interest and hysterically defame any sign of white consciousness as ‘white supremacism’. Without white gentiles putting Jewish interests before their own, Jewish supremacism cannot be sustained because Jews simply don’t have the numbers. It’s like a mind is useless if it can’t control the body. A cowboy is in trouble if he can’t control the steers. A shepherd is lost if the sheepdogs and sheep decide to do their own thing.
This is why Jews hate nationalism in all its manifestations except in Israel. Nationalism makes the people of a nation think mainly of their own kind, their own race and culture. Also, universal nationalism — national autonomy and sovereignty for each people and culture — means greater peace and stability among gentile nations as each nation will expect other nations to respect its sovereignty as it respects the sovereignties of other nations in turn. And then, there will be easier facilitation of trade and communication among nations. Also, if every nation is sovereign, it will find its own ways to deal with other nations. It won’t need a middleman power to get involved as the ultimate arbiter of what is doable and undoable, what is or isn’t right. In other words, there will be less reason for Jews to stick their noses into everything. There will be less need for Jews, period.
Therefore, it’s in the interest of Jewish Supremacism to have a turbulent world of gentiles vs. gentiles: US vs Muslims, EU vs Russia, US vs China, Saudis vs Iran, etc. This way, gentiles will be too busy hating one another to focus on what is best for their own nation. When gentiles hate gentiles, Jews can squeeze in between the cracks and manipulate all sides. Consider how American Jews declared New Cold War on Russia while Netanyahu and Jews-in-Russia assured Putin that they are doing their best to improve Russia’s standing in the world. Jews play good cop/bad cop.
Now, gentile peoples can create havoc around the world all on their own without Jews. Indeed, history in all five continents is a testament of how people can be warlike and brutal, and most human conflicts had little or nothing to do with Jews. Alexander the Great and Genghis Khan didn’t invade other peoples at the behest of Jews.
Still, there was a golden opportunity for world peace after the Cold War when the final great ideological/imperial conflict came to an end. There could have been good relations among US, EU, Russia, China, and other parts of the world as nations committed to mutual respect and rational restraint. The golden opportunity was lost because Jews knew that world peace would be 'bad' for the Jews or, more precisely, for the purposes of Jewish Supremacism. (Jews were no longer content with the good life and wanted to rule the world. Jews saw the entire world as a casino that must be controlled by themselves.) There were too many nations in the Middle East that Jews wanted destroyed. Since Jews themselves couldn’t do it, they manipulated American Power to wage Wars for Israel. And when Russia failed to fall completely into the hands of Jewish globalists and when Jews feared that the Russian resistance to Jewish supremacism might spread to EU and even the US, Jews concocted the so-called ‘New Cold War’ against Russia that actually wanted peaceful ties and trade with EU and the US. Jews simply couldn’t stand the idea of white Russian gentiles getting along with white Europeans and white Americans. By turning US and EU against Russia, Jews got to play one side against the other and vice versa.
If most peoples think in terms of their own national sovereignty, they will see no point in supporting Jewish supremacism. Why should they favor the interests of an alien people over their own? (The problem is not Jews per se but Jewish insistence on their supremacist domination of other peoples. Jews denounce gentiles-serving-gentile-interests as 'supremacist', but Jews not only serve their own interests but demand that gentiles serve Jewish interests. That is the essence of supremacism.) So many people are so confused and lost because they’ve been misled by Jews to think globally than nationally. After all, if they can’t be for their own kind, whom should they be for? Individuals have a natural longing to serve something bigger than their lone selves. But if white people have been taught that it’s evil and wrong for them to care about their own identity and serve their own interests, what about their need to serve something bigger than themselves?
This is where Jews step in as consultants to all those confused and alienated whites. Yes, whites are told they must serve something bigger than individual interest, and it happens to be Jewish interests. Or, if fanatical Zionism isn’t your cup of tea, then you must serve Homomania(which is just another way of serving Jewish power since the Homo agenda has been a proxy of Jewish power from day one). So, we have the odd spectacle in the US of White Conservatives worshiping the 2% of the population that is Jewish(even though most Jews despise white conservatives) and of White Liberals worshiping the 2% of the population that is homo(and closely allied with Jewish supremacist power).
But despite all the hysterical euphoria of praising Israel and Homos, the Jewish advice unto white goyim ultimately spirals into more confusion because a people will continue to lose out by serving another people(especially one as contemptuous as the Jews) than by serving their own interests. Imagine what would happen to Jewish power if Jews decided to serve Palestinian, Iranian, Russian, and Anglo interests but never their own. It’d be Game Over for Jews soon enough.
Because whites have been led to believe Jews are so wise and wonderful, they want to believe that the Jewish advice is the best and noblest in the world. In their childlike and sheeplike state, they believe that serving Jews is as good as serving themselves because, in return for their devotion and support, Jews will do what is best for all mankind. Whites would never be so easily hoodwinked by Chinese, Iranians, or Hindus because there is no Taboo that forbids skepticism about them. But the notion of ‘antisemitism’ has made any skepticism or criticism of Jewish power and agenda a Taboo. Any negative view of Jews is deemed a ‘rabid’ and ‘virulent’ ‘canard’. So, when Jews give advice, white people believe it’s their duty to trust and obey, just like Christians are supposed to blindly worship God and Jesus.
But when things keep getting worse as the result of heeding the Jewish advice, a complex is bound to form within white minds. One side of them says they must trust Jews because Jews are so holy & wise, and besides, it’d be ‘antisemitic’ to cast aspersions on Jews. But as the world crumbles around them, there is a growing sense that maybe Jews are not only up to no good but are no good at their very core. Russians sure found out in the 1990s when Jewish advice led to mass poverty and/or mass death for so many people. And people in the EU are beginning to notice that the Jewish push for ‘multi-culturalism’ is leading to their racial and cultural demise. According to Jewish advice, Europeans must import millions more non-whites in order for Europe to ‘survive’. Imagine the loopy logic of this Jewish advice. In order for Europe to survive, Europeans must be invaded and replaced by non-Europeans as ‘New Europeans’. Now, such an advice would sound totally nuts to a sane person, but alas, the Holocaust Cult has instilled white gentiles with mindless Jewish Worship and even more mindless ‘White Guilt’.
It’s no wonder then that Jewish supremacists can use the US & EU to wage Wars for Israel to smash the Muslim World and then steer tons of ‘refugees’(aided by George Soros & his cabal) to flood into Europe. And all those cucked-out Germans think their duty as Europeans is to serve ‘refugees’, Muslims, and Africans on the advice of World Jewry. When Germans and others put the interests of the Other above their own kind, it means White Submissivism to Jewish Supremacism is their main mode of existence.
No comments:
Post a Comment