How JUSTICE really functions in the IDOLATRY POLITICS of the Jewish-Supremacist West — The Immorality of Moral Immortality — US is a Theocracy of 'Idolocracy', a mindless worship of Jews, Blacks, and Homos

Justice, especially political justice, is a matter of who/whom: Who has the power and which groups have 'sacral' worth? This is also true of individuals — notice how certain Jews tend to get pardoned more than people of other groups, and consider how the Law pretty much allows black thugs and shoplifters/looters to walk free — but especially true at the political level. In Central America during the Cold War, the white-led right-wing regimes could employ 'death squads' and mow down countless indigenous brown folks suspected of being sympathetic to Marxist guerrillas. That was 'justice' in those parts, with the acquiescence of US power. In communist nations, the secret police could arbitrarily arrest anyone and charge him of treason, espionage, or 'bourgeois' thought crimes. The accused could be sent to prison camps or shot dead in basements. That was 'justice' under communism. So, justice is usually the tool of the power. It is what the Power wants and says it is.

Under liberal systems, there developed the idea that justice should be impartial, fair-minded, based on strict adherence to laws(applicable to all), and protective of the 'universal rights' of all citizens, rich or poor, regardless of color or creed. Though liberal systems were far from perfect in the practice of administering justice, it could be said that, more or less, the West was moving toward greater impartiality and fairness up to the 1960s. This mode of justice was based on individual rights. But the Civil Rights Movement wasn't just about the right of blacks as individuals but as a group, and that agenda, along with other trends, provided the groundwork for a different kind of justice. If traditional rightist justice favored the upper classes and certain races over others and if the radical leftist justice favored the notion of 'social justice' that trampled on individual rights in favor of the supposed good of the collective, the classic liberal notion of justice emphasized the rights of individuals. But the New Liberal theory tended to be both more collective-utilitarian(though not to the extent of communism) and special-interest-oriented in the name of reversing past injustice. Collective-utilitarian notion of justice was at the heart of the New Deal. And special-interest notion of justice animated the Great Society program of LBJ and the rise of Holocaust Cult. By emphasizing the problems of black history, the idea was that blacks as a group deserved special recognition. And because Jews suffered the Holocaust, supposedly the greatest evil act in all of history, they were deserving of special sympathy and consideration. (Initially, pro-black & pro-Jewish attitudes and policies were based on sympathy, but the rising cult of their Noble Suffering and their spectacular success in 'idolic' fields of brains & brawn led to idolatrous worship of them as the Truly Superior Races.)

This came to function as a template for other groups as well. Noticing how blacks and Jews gained so much by pushing for justice on grounds of special interest than individual rights, many groups in the US began to develop their own form of Identity Politics. Identity Politics was different from national chauvinism of old that was premised on the conviction of one's own people being somehow superior and/or more powerful than others. In contrast, Identity Politics was based on the cult of victim-hood. Your people could be said to be more special if they suffered more than others. As Identity Politics emerged when the white West pretty much dominated all the world — even the Soviet Union was mostly white, something Red China exploited in its appeal to the non-white world during the Sino-Soviet Rift — , the general impression was of White Dominance and Non-White Victim-hood. Still, as the scales of victim-hood were still determined by the Power, it all came down to who/whom/when/where as emphasized by the Narrative, the product of media & academia.
Victim-hood mattered more if the villains were white and if the victims were non-white or Jewish. And it mattered MORE if the oppression happened IN the West, especially the US or Northern Europe. And it was mostly about the 19th and 20th century. As blacks were oppressed in America by whites, they had a good claim. As Jews suffered in Europe in World War II, they too had an easy claim. But much less sympathy goes to non-white victims of whites in non-white lands. More blacks and Hindus were mowed down by whites in Africa and India, but there is far more outrage about far fewer number of blacks who were killed by whites in the US. As for all the violence among non-whites, they don't matter. Who cares about what's been happening in Kashmir? Even as anti-whites claim to call for 'de-colonization of the mind', they are hopelessly 'West-centric' in emphasizing what happened/happens in the West uber alles. (Furthermore, these 'de-colonizers' are desperate to depart from their own native lands to go live in the West. It's as if they still consider the West to be the only Metropole that matters. And of course, even most anti-Western rhetoric has been cooked up by self-hating Westerners whose minds were colonized by Jewish Power and fueled by post-Christian need for absolution by some other means. So, anti-white politics is essentially about non-whites adopting the politics of white self-loathing, and as such, non-whites are still under white mind-control, albeit that of self-loathing whites. And the fact that many of these non-whites prize Jews, blacks, and/or homos over their own kind suggests that they're still totally 'colonized' by Western Powers that now happens to controlled by Jews.) A truly de-colonized mind would stop seeing the West as the source of all good and evil — the paradise to emigrate to and the hell to denounce — , but such is the state of your average non-white & anti-white mind.

Because of the Rules of Identity Politics, various non-whites groups must demonstrate their worthiness of sympathy by emphasizing their victim-hood at the hands of whites in the West, especially in the 20th century(and maybe 19th century). But as many of these groups are relatively recent immigrants, their experience of oppression under whites happened mostly in non-Western lands, and that means their suffering counts for less than that of Jews and blacks. (Even as globalism attacks the notion of national territorial rights, the tragic worth of any history is largely determined by WHERE it happened, i.e. if the police kills a black man on US soil, that is an outrage, but if the US military kills scores of innocent civilians abroad, it doesn't matter. The logic of Tragic Dirt.) Shoah happened in Europe, and black slavery happened in the US, and as such, they matter more. (Oddly enough though, their cults of suffering are transferable to all others of their kind. So, even though American and Anglo Jews were safe during WWII, indeed infinitely more so than white goyim in Europe who died in greater numbers than the Jews did, they too can invoke 'muh holocaust' as fellow Jews. Likewise, recently arrived black African immigrants in US and Europe can also invoke BLM nonsense and 'muh slavery' even though their ancestors captured and sold black slaves to Arabs & whites and even though black-on-black oppression & violence in black nations are far beyond anything whites have done to blacks in recent years. Also, the fact that American Indian experience doesn't count for much in the Narrative shows that the rules of Identity Politics are not set in stone. If a certain group tends not to be vocal and exhibits no special talent in the 'idolic' fields, it is mostly ignored regardless of its tragic history at the hands of whites. Today, American Indians, the people with the biggest claim to victim-hood in American History, get less attention than Asian-Indians who are always talking and balking.) Identity Politics is based on victim-hood points, but over time, it has fused with the All-American culture of winner-takes-all. Jews and blacks began their Identity Politics by wailing abut their victim-hood but, in good ole American fashion, gained special consideration because of their success with money, humor, arts & culture, athletics, & entertainment. So, over time, Identity Politics became more like Idolatry Politics. In other words, 'muh victim-hood' wasn't good enough. What really mattered was 'muh victor-hood to accentuate muh victim-hood'. In other words, if a group could demonstrate superiority in some key field, its victim-hood was to be considered MORE TRAGIC on account of injustice having been done to something better. It's like it's deemed worse to kill a gorilla than a baboon or to kill a giraffe than a gazelle.

So, what we now call Identity Politics is essentially Idolatry Politics. We don't have mass parades in favor of Palestinians where everyone shows up and waves the BDS flag. But we do have 'Pride' Parades where peoples of all colors sing homosannas to fruits and trannies draped in 'rainbow' colors. Of course, Jews want it this way because an Identity Politics where all groups have equal worth — or where all non-white groups have equal worth — would be threatening to their Zionist-globalist supremacist agenda. Indeed, what would happen to Jewish Power if Americans were to give equal hearing to Palestinians, Syrians, and Iranians as to Israelis and their Jewish-American enablers? Also, so many groups around the world have had unpleasant experience with Jews, be they blacks in South Africa or the peoples of Latin America. And European History wasn't only of Antisemitism but Jewish chicaneries, some of which came to do great harm. This is why Jews are wary of all-out Identity Politics. It's like Ben Shapiro denounces it because it means groups such as Palestinian-Americans can have their day in the sun as a victim group as well.

As far as Jews are concerned, the only kind of Identity Politics that is acceptable is an Idolatrous one where Jews get to decide the who/whom. So, Jewish Identity and Jewish Suffering are special and must serve as the basis of goyim making amends to Jews by doing whatever Jews demand. And Jews have especially chosen homos and blacks as fellow Idolatrous Groups, not only because both are highly profitable to Jewish industries in fashion & entertainment but because blacks can be used to bait 'white guilt' and homo-celebration can be used to replace Christianity with Queertianity. (Deep in their hearts, Jews still regard Jesus and Paul as renegade Jews, and there is no 'hate symbol' more 'triggering' to Jews than the Christian Crucifix. Of course, as the West was overwhelmingly Christian for over a millennia, Jews couldn't say that outright, but their big dream was always to destroy Christianity and banish the Crucifix. They tried this by destroying churches in the USSR, but it didn't work, and so they are now working to spiritually corrupt Christianity with Anno Sodomini and worship of Magic Negro or Fentanyl Floyd.)

There can be no true justice or impartial justice with idolatry, which is a cheap form of theology. Idolatry may not be deep, but like religion, it is about blind or mindless worship/faith. As such, US justice system is essentially theocratic or 'idolocratic'. Just like religious folks cannot question, blame, or condemn God or gods(no matter what), the idolocratic US cannot condemn sacred Jews and holy blacks(and homos) no matter what they do. The ONLY time Jews, blacks, and homos come under fire is when they insult or attack one another. So, Donald Sterling the Jewish oligarch had to be denounced because he said unkind things about blacks. So, Nick Cannon has to be bitch-slapped back into 'sense' for having said nasty stuff about Jews — never mind what he said about whites. It's perfectly okay for Jews to insult, defame, and smear whites. It's okay for blacks to denounce whites as the devil. No matter how much abuse is heaped on them, whites must keep their mouths shut, do nothing as their symbols & monuments are vandalized by mobs or removed by the establishment, take the knee, and cuck out. Or, whites can go into brainwashed Janissary mode like Antifa goons or the likes of John Bolton & Dan Crenshaw and join with Jews against the Culture War on whites and nationalism. How can true justice operate in such a world?

The fate of Arabs and Muslims in the current order is a sure sign that Idolatry Politics has rendered Justice into a tool of special groups, namely Jews, blacks, and homos. BLM means black lives are precious, white lives are not. And, it's always who/whom. When blacks kill blacks, never mind. As blacks are special, they may kill other blacks, just like gods may fight gods. But how dare these inferior low-life white mortals dare to kill a black god like Fentanyl Floyd or Gentle Giant Michael Brown? Blacks have been robbing, raping, assaulting, and murdering whites in alarming numbers since the 1960s, but who cares? The god-race may attack the mortal-race. Gods are deemed immortal, and blackness has been immortalized in the sense that the black tragedy of American Slavery has been essentialized to apply to all black folks and all of black history. (Also, electronic recording means that all future generations of whites get to worship Otis Redding and Bob Marley as immortal gods of pop culture.) After all, the so-called 1619 project applies even to black African immigrants, the descendants of blacks who captured and sold slaves. So, all of blackness from time immemorial to all the future is to be defined by tragic suffering at the hands of whites. So, never mind Bantu genocides against other Africans. Never mind Zulu atrocities. Never mind the likes of Idi Amin and all those nasty black thugs in the US and elsewhere. All of blackness through the eons is now about 'muh slavery' and ennoblement by suffering under white 'racism'. 100,000 yrs of blackness is to center around 200 yrs of slavery in America. And Jews have done the same with 'muh Holocaust'. All of Jewish Identity and History are to be associated with that tragedy. It's as if all of Jewish-Gentile history led up to that point and all of Jewish-Gentile future must revolve around that memory that condemns whites while consecrating Jews. So, it doesn't matter if Jewish history is full of bad Jewish behavior and if Jews do terrible things now or in the future. Jewish Identity has achieved Moral Immortality via the Holocaust Cult. Of course, in practice, Moral Immortality can only be a monstrous immorality as it's downright demented for any human group to act like they're eternally hallowed and sacred, thus above the rules that apply to other groups.

What does Moral Immortality for blacks and Jews mean in practice? Consider the fate of Muslims and Arabs. There was the photograph of the Muslim man whose business was destroyed in the aftermath of the Ferguson riots. He'd done no wrong. He was strong-armed and robbed by Michael Brown, and later big bully Brown attacked a police officer and got killed in the altercation. But the ONLY narrative that mattered was 'black lives matter' or Negrolatry. The livelihoods or the lives of Muslim businessmen didn't matter at all. The Jewish Media pushed Idolatry Politics of blacks uber Muslims. And one wonders how many Muslim businesses were destroyed this time around following the death of Fentanyl Floyd? To the New American Mind, only Jews, blacks, and homos have starring roles as the good guys while whites have the starring roles as villains. All other groups have supporting roles(at best) or exist only as blurry extras in the background. In movies, we don't care how many people get killed as long as the main characters survive. In INDEPENDENCE DAY, who cares if the entire city blows up as long as the key characters are alive and well and get all the glory?
I'm assuming many more Muslims had their lives ruined as the result of riots following the death of Fentanyl Floyd, but no one cares. So, blacks have a righteous right to riot, burn, loot, and attack people. Their lives(and lusts) matter, but others don't matter. This proves the utter hollowness of all this 'liberal' yammering about Diversity and Equality. Not only are immigrant groups being slated to pay the bulk of 'reparations' to blacks but all these 'nice white liberals' show no sympathy for people such as Muslims who were attacked by black violence.

But it is even worse with Jewish Power and its use of Mass Murder Inc, aka the US military. When Neocons smeared the 'Arabists', what were they really attacking? An American policy of blindly favoring Arabs over Jews? No, so-called 'Arabists' were calling for a more fair and balanced approach to the Middle East by considering Arab/Muslim interests as well as those of Zionists. If anything, your average 'Arabist' was nevertheless more pro-Zionist than pro-Arab. Still, he wasn't 100% pro-Zionist and willing to lend an ear to the other side, especially in service to American Interests. But, that wasn't good enough for Jews, for whom it had to be 100% pro-Jewish and the hell with Arab/Muslim interests. In other words, US foreign policy must be totally JEWIST, but of course, all the cuck-shills of Zion aren't called that. Idolatry Politics means Jews are special, wonderful, and oh-so-admirable in every way. Jews being so great, how can anyone oppose any Jewish demand?
So, whatever the problem or consequence, the US must always favor Jews EVEN IF these policies lead to wanton destruction of countless Arab/Muslim lives. Jewish Lives Matter, Arab Lives Don't. Jews can wipe out Palestine off the map, but never mind, and Long Live Israel. Instead, focus on paranoid fantasies of how Iran is going to 'wipe Israel off the map'. Israel ignores international standards and has 300 nukes with stolen technology and material from the US while Iran has no nukes and has caved to every international demand. But never mind. Shower Israel with billions in aid while starving Iran and subverting its economy, making millions suffer. And if Jews cheer on Saudi Arabia's genocidal war on Yemen on grounds that it's good for Jews and bad for Iran, that's great too. And even though Mossad is carrying out terrorist attacks in Iran(and aiding the most demented terrorists in Syria), ignore all that and just accuse Iran of being the #1 terrorist nation, as worthless Donald Trump does all the time as the pathetic dog of Zion.
So-called 'liberals' are so into idolatry(of Jews, blacks, and homos) that they are incapable of fair-mindedness. And for all their bleating about injustice, they are such craven cowards who dare not offend Jews lest they lose their precious jobs in elite institutions and industries. As for 'conservatives', their hierarchical mindset means they will kneel before whomever has the most power and privilege. Whether it's Sean Hannity praising Amazon or Rich Lowry cucking before his Jewish donors, 'conservatives' are following in the grand tradition of sucking up to the royal court. As for some others on the right, cheering for White Jews over Brown Arabs is a subliminal way of White Pride. It's ironic of course. Jews prohibit white identity and white agency, but Jews wink-wink urge white rightists to cheer for white Jews and Israel(as outpost of Western Civilization) against those Sand Ni**ers. If you can't have Apartheid and Jim Crow anymore, you can at least cheer for Jim Crowitz and IDF death squads mowing down those brown women and children. The likes of David French will virtue-signal by denouncing Old America but cheer on Israelis defending the border and shooting women and children in Gaza. A truly surreal case of whites, having had their own 'racism' canceled by Jews, must outsource their 'racist' fantasies to 'white' Jews who, being Moral Immortals, have the license to mow down brown people in the old ways of colonialist-imperialist wars.

Moral Immortality means Jews and blacks get to loot the world. Jews, being smart, used financial trickery to rape the Russian economy. Jewish banksters in Wall Street got massive bailouts and grew even richer during the Great Recession at the expense of Main Street. Ever more billions are poured into the coffers of Israel while coffins multiply in the Muslim World. The likes of Paul Singer and George Soros can loot entire nations.
Blacks, being stupid and childish, loot in the savage-barbarian way of smashing windows and running off with the goods. And beating up or shooting anyone in their way. Outwardly, blacks seem to do far more damage, but the amount they steal is a pittance compared to cargoes of Jewish Booty. At most, blacks will destroy a part of town. Jewish oligarchs and sharks loot entire economies. Not for nothing was George Soros called 'the man who broke the Bank of England'. But just like most black looters get to walk away scot-free with their loot, Jewish globalist sharks are allowed to keep their ill-gotten loot and look to steal more and more.

But, Jewish Power isn't only about white collar crime. By controlling cuck-politicians of the US, Jewish Power gets to employ Mass Murder Inc, aka US military, to wage Wars for Israel, thus destroying entire nations with invasions, bombings, drone attacks, and blockades. The death tolls abroad from such ventures are far beyond the murder and mayhem committed by blacks. But what do Jews and blacks care? Even when they are caught doing bad stuff, they usually get a slap on the wrist or get pardoned. Most black looters will walk free, and so many bad Jews are never investigated, and even those who get convicted serve in minimum-security prisons or get pardoned. Such is justice in Idolocratic America. Justice follows the theocratic mode of worshipful attitudes toward certain groups who can almost never do wrong even when they do wrong, whereas certain other groups, especially whites, Palestinians, Russians, and Iranians, are always deemed wrong even when they do right. But what would be right-and-wrong in a world of 'gay marriage' and 'trannies are women' logic that has inverted all sense of reality?

https://www.bitchute.com/video/UZaI1ZqikkNH/

It's Not Enough to Blame Anarcho-Tyranny for the Current Mess — Name the Power Wizard behind Anarcho-Tyranny, and It is AnarKOSHER-Tyranny

Anarcho-Tyranny? Okay, but controlled by WHOM?

After all, anarcho-tyranny doesn’t mean total breakdown of order but selective use of ‘anarchy’ by the tyranny that directs the wild energies.

Take the Cultural Revolution in China. At first look, it may have looked like total mayhem and anarchy, but there was a guiding iron hand behind it: Mao Zedong and the Gang of Four. The Red Guards attacked Old Culture and ‘capitalist roaders’ targeted by Mao. They didn’t attack Mao and the Gang of Four.

So, it’s not enough to say ‘anarcho-tyranny’. One must ask, WHAT is the tyrannical force that is directing the ‘anarchy’? To whom/what are US ‘leaders’ of both parties beholden to?

How come there is so much moral outrage over Fentanyl Floyd and a handful of black thugs killed by police every year but total silence about the countless dead Arabs, Muslims, and etc. slaughtered by US military men who are hailed as ‘heroes’ by both parties? US police are boy scouts compared to the US military, the Murder Inc. around the world — not because US soldiers are evil by nature but because their violence is orchestrated by vile and venal globalist elites.

Notice there are no murals about PALESTINIAN LIVES MATTER. There is no outrage about how blacks rob, rape, assault, and murder, often white victims.

Instead, there's the Antifa allowed to run riot to beat up patriots like Michelle Malkin, and there's BLM to keep whites paralyzed with fear & ‘guilt’ and thus subservient to the Other(that holds the power).

So, what is this power? Unless Malkin and others are willing to loudly name and blame Jewish Power, this madness will never abate. Just calling out ‘anarcho-tyranny’ is like calling out WAR during World War II without naming Germans and Japanese as the main instigators.

What we’re witnessing is Jewish-supremacist-orchestrated anarcho-tyranny. It’s better labeled Zionarcho-Tyranny or Anarkosher-Tyranny. Jewish Power uses PC education and Pop Culture to spread anti-white hatred. This way, the ire of Diversity is directed against whites than on Jewish Power, and furthermore, many whites become burdened with ‘guilt’ and feel that the ONLY way whites can be righteous is by hunting down imaginary ‘nazis’ and screaming ‘racism’ 24/7. Jewish-controlled media are certainly spreading anti-white propaganda more murderous than anti-Jewish propaganda spread by National Socialists in the 1930s. Jews are trying not only to instill guilt among whites but to strike fear into their hearts. Jews are telling whites, "We've spread anti-white hatred so much among blacks, non-whites, and brainwashed self-loathing whites that you white goyim better obey us... or we will unleash violence against you and your children."

https://www.bitchute.com/video/aupVFLym1uA/


Also, don’t be ashamed of hate speech. Hate can be liberating. A slave must hate his master to seek freedom. A slave who only speaks love for his master will remain a slave. It is when he feels and speaks hatred about the master that he begins the path to freedom. When Jewish masters say that whites-as-cucks must only speak loving words to Jews-as-their-masters, it's a formula for white enslavement. White Liberation from the shekel-shackle begins with defiant hate speech against the Jewish Master Class. Did Poles love the Nazi invaders? Did Hungarians love the Soviet occupiers? Did Algerians and Vietnamese love the French colonizers? Did socialists love the exploitative capitalist oligarchs? No, they felt hatred, and it was hate that was liberating and led to resolve & action. White Liberation requires white hatred for Jewish supremacism. Just like Jews have a right to feel hatred about anti-Jewish oppressors, whites have every right to hate Zionarcho-Tyranny or AnarKosher Tyranny.

Now, Jewish Supremacists will say whites are not oppressed but the oppressors. Historically, a case can be made for this, but history is never static. It’s like the Romans, once conquerors over the Germanic tribes, became conquered by them. It’s like Mongols were once rulers over Russians, but later the Soviets dominated Mongolia. Muslims conquered large swaths of Europe and were once the oppressors but later they were conquered and oppressed by the Technological West. Latin Americans feel oppressed by Gringos, but Latin American societies are about the oppression of browns by mestizos and oppression of mestizos by blancos, generally speaking. Jews are now in the supremacist master race position over goyim. As they are such terrible masters and elites, they must be hated if whites and goyim are to find liberation. Palestinians sure hate Zionist oppressors, and why shouldn’t they? For the oppressed, hate speech is the most potent kind of free speech. It speaks truth to power. Moses sure spoke a lot of anti-Egyptian hatred in TEN COMMANDMENTS when he said, “Let my people go.” We need white moseses filled with righteous and liberating hatred.

Oppression is relative. Those who oppress can also be oppressed. French oppressed the Vietnamese who historically oppressed the Cambodians. During the Nazi Occupation, the French oppressors were oppressed by the Germans. Europeans oppressed the Manchu ruling class that was oppressing the Chinese. It’s like a bully can be bullied by a bigger bully.
So, while it’s true that whites are in a oppressive position vis-a-vis certain peoples, they are also in the oppressed situation vis-a-vis Jewish Supremacists. It’s like Asian Indians had an oppressive caste system but were oppressed by the British. Oppressors can also be oppressed.
So, whites need to stop oppressing whomever they are oppressing but also end the oppression over them by Jewish supremacists. As long as there is no white liberation, whites will be stained with oppression over others at the behest of Jewish supremacists. It’s because whites are such pathetic cucks to Jews that they serve as Janissary oppressors over Arabs and Palestinians who are seen by Jews as less-than-human. Jewish Supremacists oppress whites into oppressing Palestinians who never did any harm to whites.

Mentioning Anarcho-Tyranny without mentioning Jewish Power is like mentioning Brown Shirts without mentioning Hitler & Nazis or like mentioning the Janissary without mentioning the Ottoman power behind it. Or, it’s like mentioning the Sikhs without mentioning British Imperialists who employed them as the warrior wing.

Michael Tracy should have said, "I will say Black Lives Matter IF you say Palestinian Lives Matter and End Zionist Genocide of Palestinians."

We must name the source of the 'anarcho' violence. Jewish capitalists fund and direct ‘Marxist’ goons to attack white patriots who dare to gather. At Charlottesville, white nationalists did NOTHING WRONG but were shut down and exposed to violent mobs of Antifa goons and black thugs who had the protection of the police. Following Fentanyl Floyd’s death, Antifa and BLM mobs have been on the rampage but with total support of Deep State Power and with hardly any condemnation from Republicans who are ALL pathetic puppets of Jewish Donor Class. Antifa scum gets away with lots of crap because they are protected by the Power just like Jewish 'settlers' are in West Bank. The 'settlers' can terrorize Palestinians, but if Palestinians touch one hair on the Jewish Settlers, the IDF comes after the Palestinians, and Israeli courts almost always favor the Jews. Jews perfected lawfare over Palestinians.

Thank you @tuckercarlson for reporting on #DenverAnarchoTyranny & amen @PatrickForCO -We need @realdonaldtrump federal intervention. Stand down orders by mob-coddling @denverpolice & other PDs are brazen civil rights violations that endanger law-abiding.https://t.co/kISfKISMrH

— Michelle Malkin (@michellemalkin) July 23, 2020

In a way, white Americans are now reaping what they sowed when they allowed Jews to get away with murder in the creation of Israel. Most Americans didn’t think much of it, but it sent a message to Jews and whites that Jews are above the law… because of whatever, such as ‘muh holocaust’. By aiding and abetting the total destruction of the innocent Palestinians, white leaders/people set the template that (1) Jews get whatever they demand (2) Jewish lives are more precious than non-Jewish lives (3) Jews live by a different set of standards (4) Jews can do ANYTHING to goyim.

Of course, whites didn’t realize the full boomerang implication of this because it was Jewish terror directed against Arabs. But once Jews were emboldened with such attitude and power, they could then eventually direct it against OTHER peoples as well. And whites couldn’t say NO because they’d agreed to the New Template that said Jews are holy and above human standards and must be treated like gods.

So, here we are today. There is now the insane phenomenon of White Nakba. Jews encourage blacks, Diversity mobs, and white Janissary or Antifanissary to attack any sign of white identity, patriotism, or resistance. Any notion of white territory, white race, white history, white pride, white heritage, white unity, and etc. must be expunged. Whites must open their nations to Diversity, obey Jews, worship blacks, and celebrate homos. White lands are no longer white lands. White wombs are no longer for white seeds. White history for others to pilfer and appropriate. Whites must not 'steal' from other cultures, but non-whites have the 'human right' to take all they can from whites.

When Jews made demands about Palestine back in the 1940s, American Power should have been firm and sent a strong message to Jews that their identity and interests will not be favored over others, especially the Palestinians who never did any harm to the US or the West. In other words, while Jews shall be treated fairly, they shall not be favored over others just because Jews demand it be so. Jews will abide by the same principles governing all nations and peoples.
But whites relented under Jewish Pressure, and the perverse covenant between Jews-as-god and whites-as-cucks became “Jews demand, whites serve.” It began with whites helping Jews destroy Arabs and Muslims, but now, the Jewish agenda of White Nakba targets the entire West. But how can whites say no when the terms of relation with Jews is “Jews are holy, and all their demands must be served.” (Of course, Jews maintain their supremacism by BIG stick and BIG carrots. If you go against Jews, you will be totally crushed and destroyed. But if you cuck to Jews like Paul Ryan and Lindsey Graham, you shall be rewarded most handsomely. The choice is between starvation and feast, and most white elites go for the grand buffet. If the choice were between little stick and BIG carrots, more whites will be less fearful and defy Jews. Or if the choice were between BIG stick and little carrots, more whites might choose not to cuck because the reward isn't worth it. But when it's heaven if you cuck but hell if you don't, most white elites go for 'heaven'.)

In a way, things will be worse for whites than for Palestinians. At least, Palestinians never bought into the Zionist lie and knew they were going to lose everything under Jewish Power. Even in physical defeat, Palestinians still retained soulful pride as an identity. Jews failed to make Palestinian hate Palestinian-ness. In contrast, Jews are not only destroying whites physically but making whites feel disgusted over their own whiteness. We have ‘conservative’ Rich Lowry cucking to Jewish Power and cheering the destruction of Confederate heroes.

Well, at least there is a kind of poetic justice to this. Whites cheered on Jewish Terror and jeered at Palestinian plight. They cackled with hideous glee at the Palestinian tragedy while sucking up to Zionist gangsters. Well, how does it feel that the same is being done to whites? It’s like the refrain in the Bob Dylan song, "Like a Rolling Stone".

How does it feel?
How does it feel?
To be on your own
With no direction home
A complete unknown
Like a rolling stone?

By the way, why back the blue? Police in the US are like police everywhere. Mere attack dogs of the Power. Under Hitler, German police did the bidding of Nazis. Then, under Soviet domination, the very people who’d served the Nazis served the commies.

US political process is about white cucks taking orders from Jewish supremacists. So, if cops are ordered to stand down and let Antifa thugs(the Janissary of Jews) attack white patriots like Michelle Malkin, cops aren’t going to do anything about it. Malkin the Filipino is hopelessly romantic about White America. White America is now, from top to bottom, totally enslaved by Jewish Power and enthralled with mindless Negro Worship.
So, it's no surprise that Michelle Malkin and Gang got Charlottesvilled in Denver, and the police did nothing to protect them, and if anything, was complicit in the violence. US police and US laws are now totally controlled by Jewish supremacists. Just like US military goes and murders Arabs and Muslims left and right because it's all about following orders, the US police is no different. If the Power orders the police to stand down and let the mob attack patriots, the police won't do anything. Malkin must drop her faith in White America and the police, the dogs of the Power.

Finally, Anarcho-Tyranny need not be anti-white. If white supremacists controlled the US, they could use anarcho-tyranny against the Left. What was Kristallnacht but German supremacist anarcho-tyranny against Jews in Germany? Right-wing regimes in Central America allowed ‘death squads’ to carry out anarcho-tyranny on the indigenous populations. Rape, rob, and terrorize them into submission. In China, Mao used anarcho-tyranny to attack his rivals, the ‘capitalist roaders’. In South Vietnam, mercenary troops served as anarcho-tyrannists over villages suspected of harboring Viet Cong guerrillas. In Ancient Greece, Spartan youths routinely went on rampages to terrorize and frighten the helot population to keep them in line. So, anarcho-tyranny is a tool, not a particular ideology. As Shane said, a gun is only as good as the man using it. If someone is beaten with a hammer, you don’t blame the hammer but the man who used the hammer. Anarcho-Tyranny in the US is the hammer of Jewish capitalists.

So, it’s not enough to say ‘anarcho-tyranny’. It’s too fuzzy and vague. We need 20/20 vision and must see with clarity who/what is pulling the strings of anarcho-tyranny in the US and West, and it is Jewish Power that provides protection and lawfare for Antifa. It’s AnarKosher-Tyranny.

Notice how these 'leftist' types have no sense of honor. They use violence and terror against the 'system' but cry like a baby the moment they get hurt and even lie about it. A real man fights and licks his wounds. These 'leftists' use ugly violence but play 'innocent victim' the instant they get hurt. And contrary to fighting the 'system', they are enabled by the Deep State as part of coup attempt Trump. But don't expect dummies to realize they are tools.

As for faux-communist larpers like Antifa, they’re just grungy spoiled brats without elite prospects getting some thrills as 'radicals' because they can’t make it as studs and athletes. And they are funded and protected by Jewish capitalists who use them as Janissary against white patriots. German conservatives used anti-communist Nazis against Jewish Power, and Jewish Power uses ‘anti-fascist’ communists against the prospect of White Power. This has led to the odd phenomenon of capitalists supporting communists against fascism. It’s odd because fascism was willing to work with capitalism whereas communism sought to destroy it. But for Jewish Minority Power, white ‘communists’ are more reliably anti-white than white fascists, and, furthermore, Jewish Power altered the terms of Leftism into being more about globo-homo and idolatry of certain groups(blacks, Jews, and homos) than about class struggle and hate-the-rich. So, even if Antifa may be anti-rich, their primary animus against 'nazis' means that Jewish capitalists can goad them into attacking 'white supremacists'(even fantastical ones, as so many Antifa morons are on drugs) than ever getting around to attacking capitalists. In Israel, Jewish capitalists side with Jewish fascists because fascism in the Zionist context is pro-Jewish. But as fascism in white nations tend to be pro-white and even anti-Jewish, Jewish capitalist must form a symbiotic alliance with the 'communists'.

White Liberation means "Is It Good for Whites?" than "Is It Good for Jews?" — White Agency demands Whites think and act Independently of Jewish Agendas and Demands

https://www.takimag.com/article/jewish-privilege/

Steve Sailer:

"Will Jews eventually figure out that promoting antiwhite hate is not good for the Jews?
Much hinges upon that question."

So, the future depends on the Jewish decision/agency, not the white one.

Why not ask instead, “Will whites eventually figure out that Jewish Power is hostile and not good for whites?” And then, act accordingly on the basis of that undeniable fact.

Why must the future depend on Jewish realization than on white realization? Why should it be a matter of Jews realizing they should stop hating on whites than whites realizing they should hate Jews if Jews hate whites? If Jews hate whites(as is abundantly clear by all signs), shouldn’t whites return the favor? It'd only be natural, that is if whites have pride and dignity.

The Jewish-White Question or JWQ prioritizes Jewish consciousness & interests over white ones. In other words, the implication is Jews should stop hating whites ONLY or MAINLY BECAUSE it’s not good for Jews. Never mind what it means for whites.
There is a better way: If something is bad for whites, whites should take action and fight back REGARDLESS of what it means for Jews, especially if Jews are leading the anti-white charge.

When Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, did white Americans ask, “Will Japanese realize that being anti-American isn’t good for them?” and pray for the Japanese to change their minds? No, Americans didn’t care what the Japanese thought and fought back. When Germany invaded Russia, did Russians think, “Hmm, will Germans realize that attacking Russia isn’t good for Germans?” and just hope for German change of heart?

Why should whites care about Jews when Jews not only NOT care about whites but are downright hostile to them? It’s more ridiculous than the ‘conservative’ case against Affirmative Action, i.e. it is bad because it hurts blacks. What about what it does to whites? Why must white interests always take the backseat to those of Jews and blacks and now others, such as ‘Dreamers’?

At this point, it’s about time whites realized that Jewish Power is hostile to them. Not all Jews are, and there are Jews like David Cole who want whites and Jews to bury the hatchet and get along, and kudos to them, but they don’t have the Power, no more than pacifist Japanese during WWII. It is about time that whites realized that Jewish Power(the only thing that matters) is virulently anti-white, and therefore, whites must stop caring about Jews.
If Jewish Power cared about whites, whites should care about Jews. It'd be give-and-take. But when it’s all take-and-take among Jews, whites would be stupid to care about what Jews think or whether it’s good for Jews or not. Your average Jew-of-Power has an attitude closer to that of Rob Reiner or Sarah Silverman than that of David Cole or even Dave Rubin. National Review came to the defense of Matt Yglesias, and his reaction was “Ewwwwwww, get away from me!!”

Do Jews plead with whites, “Don’t do such and such because it’s bad for you white folks”? No, they are hellbent on making sure whites do stuff that is bad for whites. Notice how all those Jews who signed the pro-‘free speech’ petition got involved ONLY BECAUSE their own kind was coming under pressure from the rage mob. They didn’t care one bit about all those ‘conservatives’ who'd gotten doxed and destroyed.

Ben Shapiro and Bari Weiss whine about the dangers of identity politics and ‘tribalism’ without any self-awareness. Or maybe they know and are just being devious cretins.
In fact, what is known as Identity Politics began with Jews. Contrary to popular belief, so-called identity politics isn’t so about tribalism as idolatry of certain groups. As such, it is more dangerous than tribalism that, at the very least, allows equal rights of identity & interests for each and every group. Tribalism is as old as the hills: My people, my culture, my heritage. If US were truly tribal and if each group prioritized its own interests, it wouldn’t be so bad. There would be a kind of balance. Indeed, imagine how fairer things would be if whites were tribal and cared about white interests and didn’t always intervene in favor of Jewish interests over Palestinian ones. In other words, whites would approach Jews and Palestinians on the basis of 'what is good for whites', sometimes favoring Jews over Palestinians and sometimes the other way around. But the Identity Politics of Jewish Idolatry means whites must be knee-jerk in their mindless support of Jews and Israel no matter what. It's great for Jews but bad for whites and terrible for Palestinians. The problem is whites are into the Identity Politics of idolizing Jews.

Identity Politics boils down to the demand that all other groups should revere, favor, serve, and idolize a certain group or groups over all else. Thus, it’s not even a fair kind of tribalism where each group gets to favor its own kind. Rather, one or few groups hog all the praise, adulation, and support. Instead of all groups being planetary in its gravitational pull, most groups must revolve around the greater identity gravitational force of key solar groups. Jews occupy the place of the sun and chose homos and blacks as main allies. All other groups are mere planets that must revolve around the Identity Politics of Jews, blacks, & homos. Notice there is nothing about PALESTINIAN LIVES MATTER even though the US war machine is far more racially hostile to Arabs than to blacks, a people actually adulated by US media and culture.

Jewish power is immense not only because of riches and institutional power but because other groups, especially majority whites, bend to its will. After all, Wasps once had great wealth and institutional domination but lacked the kind of power Jews have now because they were open to criticism and didn't demand Wasp-Worship. They were dominant but not holy idols for other groups to mindlessly revere and obey.
Even the emphasis on the Anglo-American Narrative was a compromise with non-Anglo groups. While non-Anglos would learn of Anglo-American achievements and respect Anglo-American giants and heroes, Anglo-Americans would in turn broaden the definition of ‘American’ to accommodate non-Anglos. Thus, Anglos and non-Anglos would merge into the big tent identity called ‘American’.

In contrast, Jews demand that all groups bow down to Jewishness, but Jewish Identity remains stingily particular and distinct, even downright exclusive. How can there be any compromise with such people? Sarah Silverman said Jews hate nationalism because it did harm to Jews. But if Jews had dropped their own ‘nationalism’ of separate identity long ago, they would have just merged and dissolved with other populations, the sea of common humanity, and then, there would have been no Jew-Goy tensions. So, what did she really mean? She meant all goyim must give up their nationalism so that Jewish nationalism alone can thrive and grow stronger. Compromise is impossible with such people.

Compromise means either all groups drop their nationalism or all groups keep their nationalism. But the Jewish Way is for Jews to keep their nationalism while goyim must lose theirs. It’s ‘heads I win, tails you lose’. It is supremacism, pure and simple. Also, mindless worship of Jews as Eternal-Holocaust-People has led to race-nihilism or the nihilism of power. As long as Jewish Essentialism is forever about the Shoah, everything they do, no matter how rotten, is justified or forgivable on grounds that they are the Holy Holocaust Tribe. So, even when Jews do grave harm unto others, whites cheer on the Forever Good Jews while turning a blind eye to their victims. Because Jews are the Holy Holocaust People, they can crush Palestinians, and if Palestinians resist, they are the 'nazis' and 'Anti-Semites'. Likewise, because blacks are Noble Negroes forever identified with American Slavery, even their violent rages are always justified, and never mind all the non-black victims of black thuggery and lunacy. It's Jews and blacks uber alles. Sympathy for Jews and blacks may have begun as moralism but it's since degenerated into nihilism... just like too many religious folks came to believe that all their aggressions and violence were justified as long as in the name of God, Jesus, Allah, or Muhammad. It's even more dangerous when people begin to worship other humans as godlike. Moral consideration for Jews went from denouncing white/goy supremacism to justifying Jewish supremacism, but as long as Jewish Power is cloaked in the banner of combating goy supremacism, its own supremacism remains camouflaged.

It’s time for Divorce between whites and Jews. Whites should think in terms of the Bob Dylan song: "

You say you disturb me
And you don’t deserve me
But you know sometimes you lie
You say you’re shakin'
And you’re always achin'
But you know how hard you try
Sometimes it gets so hard to care
It can’t be this way everywhere
And I’m gonna let you pass
Yes, and I’ll go last
Then time will tell who has fell
And who’s been left behind
When you go your way and I go mine

Current Crisis is less a Matter of Wrong Ideology than Abnormal Psychology(on a Mass Scale)

It seems ideology is now secondary to psychology, much of it abnormal.

What we are witnessing is so much lunacy with no relation to reality.

At least when communism was a major movement in the late 19th century and the 20th century, there were workers mired in terrible conditions. There was violent class repression. So, even if communism ultimately proved not to be the answer, its criticisms and promises had something to do with reality.

And the same could be said of the Civil Rights Movement. Whatever one thinks of MLK and the demands, blacks were second-class citizens in the US without full guarantee of rights.

And even though, in retrospect, anti-communist rhetoric was exaggerated — Soviet Union never had more missiles than the US and faced huge economic problems, and communist victory in Vietnam didn't set off the 'domino theory' — , there really was a Cold War and the Soviet Empire to rival US empire.

But today, there is MORE hysteria, paranoia, rage, and hatred than ever BUT with no relation to reality. BLM is based on a total falsehood. Russia wants peace and trade, not a 'new cold war'. But the anti-Russian hatred is beyond belief. Border security is what national stability and Rule of Law are about, but ‘liberals’ and ‘progressives’ claim that detaining illegals is like the Holocaust all over again. Trump is a fool, clown, and charlatan, but is he ‘literally Hitler’? Russia Collusion stuff was a total hoax, but half the nation, from elites to masses, was totally enthralled with it. A free press is supposed to be about clarifying the truth, not using smoke-and-mirrors in collusion with Deep State. Covid-19 is a problem, and precautions should be taken, but is it really End of the World scenario where entire economies must be sanctioned for ‘recovery’?

When ideology is based on mindless idolatry of Jews, blacks, homos, & ‘muh diversity’ and when it has no bearing on actual reality, it’s no longer about clash of visions or values. It’s about dealing with mass psychosis created by PC indoctrination and Pop Culture degeneracy, made worse by the fading of true faith, heritage, tradition, family, and things that really matter.

In the past, dealing with leftists was to wrestle with wrong ideas. Though leftist or radical solutions were misguided, they were still addressing some real problems and serious issues. Today, we are not dealing with wrong ideas but CRAZY notions. Some of it is surely ‘larping’ as a whole bunch of Antifa kids seem to be bored with life and in search of ‘authenticity’ by 'commitment' and 'radical' action, especially as globalism has hollowed out the middle class, which means that many educated young ones don’t have much of a future. But others really believe in the nonsense. (Also, increased enrollment means that too many dummies got college degrees and expect elitist prospects that aren't available for them. So, they direct their frustration at fighting 'systems' this-or-that or the 'nazis'. As Jews control the academia/media, they cleverly make sure that the disaffected youths target ANYTHING but the Jews. Make the youths believe US is threatened by 'neo-nazis' than by Jewish supremacists who really control things.)

In a sane and mature society, crazy impulses would be balanced by critical mindset championed by liberals and caution & culture of respect urged by conservatives. But liberal culture of free thought & free speech centered on critical thinking is dead. And conservatism just became cravenism and opportunism: Cowards too afraid to displease their Jewish masters or greedy little shills of big money. When GOP’s main funding base is Koch Brothers and Las Vegas — and when John Boehner is now a salesman for Weed — , where is the culture of adulthood?

Without liberal criticality and conservative sobriety to push back against the nuttery, the lunacy just grows worse. Antifa is Peter-Pan-ism with clubs. BLM is like a horror movie: All these brave black souls battling evil white cop zombies and KKK everywhere. It’s all based on fantasy. It's politics as pop genre.
In a way, young people today probably feel cheated because all the great causes were in the 20th century. So, just like the music industry and movie industry, all they have is to recycle and rejigger past causes and events into neo-narratives so that they too could feel part of a great movement. So, cops are the KKK, and Trump is ‘hitler’, and Putin is the ‘other hitler’. (As Jews control media and academia, they taught young ones to see Evil in terms of ‘racist’, ‘nazi’, or ‘anti-semite’. Or ‘homophobe’.) And Conservatism Inc seems nostalgic for the Cold War and seeks out the New Evil Empire to be relevant again. John Bolton is a willfully delusional psychotic on the ‘right’, a mad dog of the Jewish supremacists who encourage such fantastical mindsets as guarantees of More Wars for Israel.
Speaking of mass mental psychosis, what bigger proof is there than homo-mania? What sane person believes in ‘gay marriage’? And yet, in mass psychotic US, 80% support it. And it seems majorities in many nations now believe a tranny is really a ‘woman’. And even though Jews rule the US, noticing Jewish Power means you are ‘delusional’. Truth = delusional according to the Narrative that characterizes rioters and looters as 'mostly peaceful protesters'.
Over the years, the main obsession became not truth or justice but POWER. So, anything that increases power for your side is good. If falsehood is more empowering for your side, it is preferable to truth that could undermine it. This is the result of the 'Nietzscheanization' of the Left. This is why BLM marches with falsehoods. This is why Jewish Supremacists spread lies and more lies to wage more Wars for Israel and to deflect attention from Jewish Power. In all this, there is no place for honor because a person or people with honor will sometimes concede ground to the other side based on higher principles of truth and justice. Jews, homos, blacks, and cucks have no sense of honor. Jews, homos, and blacks are shameless in their power-lust, and white cucks are utterly craven in getting some crumbs for themselves. When POWER than truth, justice, or honor is at the center of the struggle, lies will usually override the truth because, in politics, lies are more useful and convenient than the truth. At least cynics know they are using lies to further their agendas, but don't expect the masses of dummies to, wink-wink, understand the game. Being naive, earnest, stupid, and ignorant, they often swallow the lies with spiritual fanaticism. It's like Mao Zedong understood that the Cultural Revolution was really a power struggle to get rid of his rivals by youth rage as the battering ram, but the mindless Red Guards believed in the movement 100%. Today, cynical Jewish elites and Democratic Party are using Covid-19 panic and BLM nuttery to undermine Trump, but many progs and youngsters are totally swept up in the hysteria.

Though mass-psychosis affects both sides, it is nevertheless a bigger problem on the 'left' because lunacy is usually made worse by self-righteousness. It's like adding fuel to fire. The current Narrative gives the 'left'(of Jews, blacks, and homos) the moral edge over the 'right'. So, while the 'right' is hampered by moral defensiveness, apologetics, and self-doubt, there are far fewer moral or emotional brakes on the nuttery of the 'left'.
If Bob harbors hatred for Bill and vice versa BUT if Bob is made to feel guilty about hating Bill whereas Bill is made to feel great about hating Bob, Bill's hatred will be more out of control, even to the point of insanity. The fact that the biggest 'sins' in the West are 'racism', 'homophobia', and 'antisemitism' means that the 'left' has the moral advantage over the 'right'. So, its derangement syndromes feel more justified. Indeed, it feels more justified the more deranged(i.e. 'passionate' or 'committed') it is.

Maybe it’s time to stop calling them the ‘left’, ‘liberal’, or ‘progressive’ and start calling them out on their psychological states. They should be called hysterics, paranoids, psychotics, delusionals, schizos. We need Schizology to understand what is really going on. (And these terms also apply to ‘conservatives’, as most of them are bimbo idiots or cuck shills. Alt Right held some promise, but the mental states of Richard Spencer, Chris Cantwell, and Matt Heimbach proved they are loony as well.) Given the current mass mental state of the US, it’s no wonder we got presidents like Barack Obama and Donald Trump. Obama the narcissist hustler and Trump the snake-oil salesman. And who’s the candidate now? Joe Biden the mentally-gone nominee. And why not? In a crazy nation, having a working mind or honest mind is actually a handicap.

There is medical craziness and mass craziness. Tiny percentage of people are genuinely schizo or delusional in the medical sense. They see and hear things that are obviously not there. Most people are not mentally abnormal. They are not medically crazy. And yet, how come so many people can become mass-crazy? How did so many Chinese become lunatic Red Guards? How did Germans, the most educated people, become minions of pathological Hitler? How did Jews, the most cerebral people, become such diehard fanatics of communism? Why are so many boys and girls falling for trans-gender nonsense and declaring themselves as 'really male' or 'really female'? It goes to show a people need not be medically crazy to be drive to mass-craziness. Just look at the spread of ugly tattoos and piercings, especially among people who are clearly not medically crazy.

In a way, we are already partly trans-human. We don’t yet have machines and man merged into one, which is still sci-fi stuff in the future. And yet, especially in our electronic age, the various devices such as radio, TV, smart-phones, and internet function as extensions of our eyes and ears(and our minds as well, as most people 'think' through the 'expertise' of others). So, even if we are not medically crazy, we can be mentally fed with lots of crazy, false, stupid, ridiculous, degrading, & hysterical notions and spellbound with insane idolatry. Even non-crazy people can be made mass-crazy with endless streams of nonsense about stuff like Russia Collusion Hoax or “Muslims are taking over America!!”(a favorite on the ‘right’). Insofar as electronic media serve as extensions of the eyes, ears, senses, and even brains(as most people go along with ‘expert opinion’ than form their own) of the masses, entire peoples can be driven mass-crazy with lots of false info, hysterical fear-mongering, delirium, paranoia, rapturous hatred, sensationalist idolatry, and etc. Also, the kind of people who tend to gain the most money and power tend to be sociopaths, and as such, they use the instruments of media, academia, and etc. to spread ANYTHING(no matter how false or dangerous) that furthers their agenda. Think of George Soros.

Most Chinese were not medically crazy but were made mass-crazy because Mao and his flunkies controlled mass propaganda in China. Most Germans were not medically crazy but fell under the sway of Hitler and his pathological henchmen like Joseph Goebbels who gained control of media and education.

The erosion of liberal critical thinking and conservative sobriety has led to a culture dominated by PC lunacy and Pop Culture fantasies. When the control of American Liberalism went from Wasps to Jews, Jewish Liberals had a choice between choosing liberalism or tribalism, and they chose the latter, and liberalism got worse and worse as the result. Alan Dershowitz, once the face of liberal ACLU and free speech, is now a cretin who will pull any gangster trick for Israel and Jewish Power. Cass the Ass Sunstein is no better. As ‘good liberals’, they warn of ‘fascism’ but support Jewish gangster-fascism of the worst kind. As for conservatism, it is useless without a backbone. It needs strong roots and a sense of structure. But what is American Conservatism now? It is David French sucking up to Jewish Power and singing along with ‘money rules everything’ and praising 'drag queen story hour' as what American Conservatism is all about.

Can mass craziness be stopped? Not when it spreads like a forest fire. Then, the ONLY way it can end is to burn itself out. This is why we should not oppose the Chaz-ization of blue cities. Let the lunatics run the asylum. Those who can’t learn through the mind will learn the hard way, through the body.

Welcome to Schizopolis.

When WHITE POWER is Taboo, the Only Thing a White Individual can hope for is White Privilege — In that sense, We are living in the Age of White Privilege

The so-called Left yammers on and on about 'white privilege' while many on the 'right' deny it exists. It's more accurate to say White Privilege does exist but as a function of White Submission than of White Supremacism. After all, if indeed the entirety of white race had a solid supremacist position over all other races, there would be no need for White Privilege. Who needs privilege when you got supremacist power over others? Even though White Supremacism is racially defined, it is at least universalist within the white race, i.e. all whites, smart or dumb, rich or poor, share in their superiority & supremacy over or security & safety from other peoples, groups, and races. So, even though some whites would be socially and/or economically privileged over other whites, ALL whites would be universal in their superiority over or security from other races. There would be no White Privilege because ALL whites would share in the dominance. It would be universalist within the particularity of the white race.

The term 'privilege' connotes something more than domination or shared power/position. It implies 'exceptionality' limited to a few. Thus, if something is broadly shared by the entire population, it doesn't qualify as privilege EVEN IF another group is broadly kept in a subservient position. So, if society is made up 50/50 of People A and People B and if ALL members of People A have superiority over all members of People B, it can be called Power but not Privilege. Power unites, Privilege divides. Power for People A would unite all of them, from rich to poor. In contrast, Privilege for People A would mean only select members of the group would enjoy special advantages or exemptions from burdens shared by the rest. If indeed People A had Power over People B, privilege would matter more among People B as some of them would seek favors that would advantage them over most of their kind who must keep within the subservient position.
In the American South, a white man, no matter how poor, could not be enslaved. This fact united him with other whites. Rich or poor, whites could not be slaves. This was not a privilege but the power of rights that applied to all whites. In contrast, privilege mattered a great deal to blacks because any black could be enslaved. So, for a black man to be a free man, that was a matter of privilege. Without such privilege, he was like all the other 'ni**ers'. And there was a privilege system even among the black slaves: the House Negroes and the Field Ni**ers. While both groups were slaves, the former got access to the massuh's house, ate better, enjoyed more petty freedoms, and got more access to good stuff. Because, by and large, blacks had a subservient position to whites in the American South, privilege was a very important thing for blacks as individuals. Since they could not gain power, freedom(as a right), and full spectrum of rights as a People, they could only hope to gain advantages as individuals of privilege. Such privileges exempted them from the lot faced by most of their kind.

Fast Forward to today, and we can argue that White Privilege is indeed a real phenomenon but not in the way that 'left'(as controlled by Jewish Supremacists) would have us believe. According to the Official Narrative, ALL whites enjoy this thing called 'white privilege'. But if something is universal among whites, it's not a privilege but a power. But where do you see any such? Whites are divided as 'liberals' and 'conservatives'. Denied the identity of race/heritage/culture, whites seek meaning only through ideology of 'libertarian individualist conservatism' vs 'radical collectivist progressivism' OR idolatry(or 'idology' as fusion of ideology and idolatry) for the Holy Three of Jews, Negroes, and Homos. White elites disdain the white hoi polloi, and increasingly the white masses hate the white elites.
Also, the Official Dogma of New Jewish-ruled America says that Whiteness is at best problematic and at worst downright evil. Whiteness is the Mark of Cain, a human stain, and the original sin of creation(not unlike Nation of Islam's theory about how whites were grafted from the black race). Whites must feel guilt, whites must atone, whites must feel shame, whites must surrender their lands, whites must surrender their jobs & wealth, whites must kneel & sob, white wombs must be sexually colonized by blacks, white soldiers must fight, kill, and die for Jewish Supremacist crusades, and etc. In other words, whites must live for the Other, not for their own kind. White Power is evil. White Unity is cursed. White Identity is wicked. White Anything is suspect.
Then, there is nothing to unite whites together. There is no intra-universality among whites that binds them together against the Other. Indeed, whites must especially cuck and apologize because they still happen to be the richest people in the world, mostly the result of past White Evil, Greed, Rottenness, and Wickedness. And of course, White 'liberals' and progs are onboard with such worldview, not least because they were raised by the 2 PC's: Pop Culture and Political Correctness dominated by Jews — over the years, Pop Culture and Advertising have become overly politicized by capitalist elites trained by 'cultural marxists' in colleges who spread the notion of 'cultural hegemony'; as these elites no longer believe in communism, they use the capitalist means of marketing to spread the 'idology' of Jew-worship, homo-worship, Negro-worship, and Diversity Cult. (Some radicals and blacks say 'white liberalism' is also a form of white supremacism, and there is a kernel of truth in the claim in that 'white liberalism' could only arise from a state of white supremacism. It was the supremacist position of whites that made some whites drop their guard, grow more generous & conscientious, be less tribal & warlike, and be more critical of their own kind. They could risk such magnanimity because they took white power, security, wealth, and well-being for granted, even as a permanent state of being. Indeed, is it any wonder that some of the biggest virtue-signaling 'white liberal' types tend to live in nice areas with plenty of money and security? If a whole bunch of black savages were coming to rape and pillage them, they would change their tune sooner than later. So, even as 'white liberalism' denounces white supremacism, it exists only as a product of white domination over other races. Whites gained such power and success that a large portion of them could drop their natural guard, ignore their tribal instincts, and put on do-goody airs toward the Other that was seen as helpless children. It's like humans in a state of nature do not feel generous toward animals that are seen as rivals; it was only when modern man gained absolute supremacist dominion over the natural world that humans began to wax poetic about fauna and flora as something that needs protection. Environmentalism is the product of human supremacism over nature. Living in the state of nature, mankind's main worry would be to survive other animals than to help them survive the impact of humans.)

Because whiteness is now so degraded and demeaned, there is no advantage to white identity, white unity, and white continuity as building blocks for white power. In the American West, all whites united to fight the Indians and conquer/settle the lands. In 19th century South Africa, whites of all kinds banded together against blacks. (Back then, whites easily made up 50% of the sparsely populated region.) It was about White Power, not white privilege. All whites of different stripes and backgrounds were united in their identity and purpose. Even though they created social orders in which whites had advantages and rights over others, the rules applied universally to all whites. Whites didn't need privilege because they insisted on the unity of power. It's much the same among Jews in Israel and West Bank. Jews don't need special privileges because they got the power. ALL Jews are favored over ALL Arabs. If anything, it is the Arabs who rely on special privileges(granted by Jewish Supremacists) if they are to avoid the fate of most Palestinians. It's like some Chinese and Hindus collaborated with the British Imperialists for special privileges. Whereas all whites belonged to the dominant race and had their rights secured under the Imperial Law, Hindus and Chinese needed special privileges to enjoy better positions in the Order.

Given the current reality where whiteness is as reviled as Jewishness was in National Socialist Germany, whites better rely on privileges to have it so good. Whereas blackness, Jewishness, and homo-ness are innately holy according to the New Order, whiteness is fake, vile, venal, ugly, hideous, and evil. As whiteness sucks so bad, it can hardly be used as an organizing principle, unifying force, matter of dignity, or point of pride. In other words, 'white' is the 'new ni**er'. Since being white is a great moral, historical, political, social, and spiritual disadvantage, it makes no sense to aspire toward White Power that might unite all whites as one race with shared destiny. In other words, there can be no intra-universal truth to whiteness. The ONLY THING all whites must share is guilt and shame about whiteness. When it comes to celebration, it must be about homos; when it comes to awe & fever, it must be for blacks; when it comes to reverence & obedience, it must be for Jews.
In such an Order where whiteness is just a ticket to hell, white individuals need privileges more than ever as exemptions from collective punishment. White Privilege is like buying indulgences, once a common practice in the Catholic Church. So, in that sense, we do live in a world of White Privilege. This privilege doesn't apply to all whites as privilege can never be universal, not even intra-universal. Privilege always applies to select individuals or a small inner-group, not to an entire population, even if it is generally advantaged over another population. For example, there were dirt-poor white farmers in the American South who were materially worse off than House Negroes on big plantations. The advantage they had over blacks was not a matter of privilege but power.

Back then, white power mattered. Today, nothing is excoriated more than the notion of whiteness + power or whiteness + identity. It's NOT okay to be white. When power is disallowed, privilege is the only game in town. If your people have been condemned as a whole, then forget about Power. Just seek privilege as a white individual, or as an individual virtue-signaler who is eager to secure one's privilege by ho-de-do-ing that you are working oh-so-very-hard to expunge yourself of the evils of 'racism' and 'white supremacism'.
Then, it's no surprise that today's white elites are all about privilege, not power. When it comes to power, they recognize Jewishness, blackness, and homo-ness as the only identities/qualities deserving of it. Whiteness deserves no power, and white lands and white wombs must surrender to the Other. Still, white individuals want success and money, and since they can no longer rely on White Power, they must go for White Privilege, an advantage that, far from applying to all whites, applies ONLY TO those whites who can afford to pay indulgences to the 'woke' extortion industries. So, all those multi-national corporations, including Chick-Fil-A(now more like Dic*-Fill-Ass), go out of their way to appease the Wokextortionists or Woktortionists to gain favor as good House Honkeys or Corpo-Cucks. Jeff Bezos and Jack Dorsey are super-duper-rich, but they don't have white power. Just white privilege. Of course, they don't care as long as they got theirs and the approval of their 'moral superiors' made up of Jews, blacks, and homos. They are happy honkucks.

Still, the crucial point is what they got is privilege, not power. They got privilege by cuck-collaborating with the real power of Jews, blacks, and homos. This state of affairs illustrates how power isn't just about money but about prestige. A House Negro could be far better off than some Po' White Trash, but the latter was a free man who could take his freedom for granted. No matter how poor and 'trashy' he may be, he couldn't be enslaved by the richest white plantation owner. But even the fanciest House Negro eating well and living in the Massuh's Mansion could lose his privileges overnight and be sent to pick cotton. So, even when the House Negro is materially well-off, he wasn't free and actually had less power than even the lowest Po' White Trash. In a way, the likes of Tim Cook and Bill Gates understand this. They are mega-rich and got more money than they could ever hope to spend, but they got no power because they are white. They can pour tons of money into various ventures and causes but never for the power of their race. If anything, to keep their privileges, they must pour vast sums into causes that do harm to whites while expanding the power of Jews, Negroes, and Homos.

So, we are indeed living in the Age of White Privilege. When Power is banned, all you can strive for is privilege.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/lSNArbFnPxgW/