At the same moment the ADL began, a number of Jewish businessmen from the Boston area were plotting to finance the most degrading and hateful blackface movie ever made—The Birth of a Nation. The silent movie epic released in 1915 was the first movie blockbuster, smashing all box office records.
I can understand why black people would be offended by D.W Griffith's movie, but it's one of the most prophetic movies ever in American History. It is less a historical summary than a future warning. And its warnings have been validated by history. Indeed, the reason why that movie is now so denigrated and suppressed(despite Griffith's reputation as the first great movie-maker) is not because its contentions are false but because they ring truer than ever. But PC neo-victorianism vilifies and represses all-too-obvious truths, leading its minions to be triggered into hysterical fits of panic by any utterance that deviates from the Iron Bubble Narrative.
So, what does the movie tell us?
1. Naive white do-gooder elites have no idea what's really in store for them. Complacent with inherited power(that was originally hard-fought and won by years of war and conflict) or shoe-horned into privilege(by having the right connections and/or fashionable opinions) and imbued with Christian notion that all souls are goody-goody alike around the world, they believe that black is white and white is black, and all will get along if whites only try harder. In truth, blacks have different temperaments & souls and regard white good-will as a weakness to flatter and manipulate. The woman's father in the movie is a do-gooder white guy who trusts the mulatto... who later tries to rape his daughter.
2. Rise of mulatto as conduit between whites and blacks. As even well-meaning whites find total blackness a bit intimidating, they rely on the semi-white-ish mulatto as bridge. Back in the days, most mulattoes were products of white men and black women: symbols of white sexual advantage. Today, most are products of black men and white women with jungle fever: symbols of black sexual advantage. These mulattoes are Loki-like characters who have black aggression but white calculation. They use their white intellect to serve the black soul. We saw this with Barack Obama and now see other mulattoes taking over the Democratic Party(though, to be sure, mainly as shills of Zionist Supremacists). Notice that even proggy Democrats prefer mulattoes to outright blacks: Kamala Harris and Cory Booker. Mulatto serves as the butter to soften the white bread before it is devoured by the Negro. Whites are more likely to fall for mulattoes because there is something white-like about the latter, making them appear 'less threatening', as with Colin Powell and Barack Obama. Blacks rely on mulattoes as cross-over figures... though mulattoes also fool and cheat blacks as well whites. And mulattoes manipulate both sides, white and black, to accrue more advantage for themselves. In some ways, mulattoes feel as the superior race because they got white intellect(superior to black intellect) and black soul(stronger than white soul).
3. Black political corruption. While corruption is endemic all around the world, black corruption really takes the cake(and the cornbread, grits, chitlins, black-eyed peas, fried chicken, an entire bucketful). Just look what Negro politicians have done to Detroit, Baltimore, black parts of St. Louis-Milwaukee-Chicago-Oakland. Because blacks tend to be more impulsive, more egocentric, more uninhibited, and more psychopathic, they are more shameless and unrestrained in their corruption. Furthermore, because they can get off the hook so easily by screaming 'it be racist!', they know they can get away with so much. Even though the depiction of corrupt black politicians in BOAN is cartoonish and over-the-top, the state of black politics in the US(and other black run places like South Africa) isn't much different from the movie.
4. Blacks are naturally wild and savage, and if unrestrained, will revert to their jungle nature. Anti-'racists' have been attacking such 'negative' racial stereotype forever, but then, even they have been at odds with their own narrative. On the one hand, goody-good 'anti-racist' Libs say it's wrong to say stereotype blacks and say they are wilder and more prone to ugabuga. But then, they praise blacks for having natural rhythm, dancing better, singing louder, coming up with new forms of hyper-sexual music & dance, and spreading trends like bumping-and-grinding and 'twerking'. Libs get triggered when someone says blacks are more into 'let the good times roll', but they say blacks be so fuzzy-wuzzy-funky and hot-cool-badass sassy and indeed thawed and liberated lame white people from ice-cold puritanical repression. BOAN says blacks are naturally wilder, and it has been condemned for racial stereotyping. But how do the Jewish-Liberal-controlled media depict blackness? As thug athletes, thug rappers, sex-crazed studs whose only idea is 'muh dic*', black 'biatches' who be 'twerking' and yapping about her booty(and even be named Bootisha or Assnique). Also, ever since blacks obtained total freedom to express their true nature, their culture has turned more savage and crazy. If anything, depiction of black savagery in BOAN is mild compared to what rappers and other black thugs do in culture.
5. Black men despise white males as wussy and want to hump white women. This was one of the core message of BOAN. If left unchecked, black male lust will stalk white females. We've been told that this is just racial fear and paranoia with no basis in reality. But in SOUL ON ICE, Eldridge Cleaver wrote his own Portnegro's Complaint. Just like Philip Roth the Jew said he had endless 'boings' thinking of Aryan-blonde Shikses(and Norman Mailer wrote a very porny-horny book on Marilyn Monroe as his sex goddess... who married Jewish Arthur Miller btw), Cleaver said he not only fantasized raping white women but really did it(though he didn't serve many yrs in prison even in those days). Look at FBI rape statistics, and most interracial rape in the US is almost entirely black-on-white and black-on-non-black. And much of Rap culture is about black guys and white girls with jungle fever dumping on dorky white guys. Also, Jews control pornography and promote interracial black-man-and-white-woman as the thing. From pop culture to porn culture(though two have merged considerably under Jewish cultural hegemony), the message is black guys are the real men and want white women, and white women should go with superior Negroes. So, BOAN was proved right on that account. Where it was wrong(hopefully naive) perhaps was that white women in the movie are shown to rebuff the advances by black men at every turn. But Griffith should have known better because Jack Johnson became champion before the movie came out. Because blacks are racially-athletically superior to whites, he easily destroyed and humiliated so many white men, but what did a lot of white women do? Stick with their fallen men out of racial solidarity? No, just like French women who ran into arms of victorious Germans in WWII and Japanese women who ran into arms of US GI's after Japan's defeat, white women ran into the arms of Jack Johnson. Since then, the sports culture has been one of black guys dominating the field, white cuck athletes serving as bench-warmers, and countless white women getting knocked up by Negro athletes and thugs. The biggest name in the movies of the 90s and 2000s, Quentin Tarantino, was raised by such a mudshark. And in the 90s, madonna or mudonna's second act was that she was passed around as an inflatable sex doll by blacks in the NBA. So, if anything, BOAN was mostly right about the sexual dynamics of black and white but didn't go far enough. If white men lose power, not only will black guys come after white women but white women will go with Negroes. It's like Poland is turning into Simon Moland. One African goes to Poland and gets to hump over 300 jungle-feverish women.
--------------------
Today, Jews denounce BOAN and speak about those 'bad old days', but have things really changed? No. Though depictions of blacks today are 'positive', the underlying assumptions about race are much the same as in BOAN. Hollywood doesn't show that all races are equal. After all, why does it promote black male and white female pairing more than white male and black female pairing? It is on the assumption of racial differences, i.e. black men are more masculine and white women are more feminine, thus implying that white women should go with superior black men. Likewise, most white/Asian pairing is white male and yellow female, suggesting that white men are manlier than yellow men, therefore yellow women should go with white men. So, interracism is just another form of 'racism'. It is not about racial equality but racial superiority. And given that most depictions of blackness in the media & entertainment are hyper-sexual, people 100 yrs after BOAN still believe that blacks have that surplus ugabuga sexual mojo. In BOAN, it as presented negatively whereas now it is presented positively, but the underlying assumptions are identical: Blacks be wild and crazy as the People of Sex. And look at sports culture. Who watches sports such as NBA, NFL, and Track & Field and comes off thinking, "Gee, race is just a social construct." No, any honest person notices BAMMAMA, or Blacks Are More Muscular And More Aggressive. Now, if that is true, what is its social implications? It means tougher blacks will intimidate, threaten, beat up, and humiliate whites in schools, streets, public places, and even home invasions. It means white men will lose pride of manhood and lose their women to black men. So, if we connect the dots, the fact that blacks dominate sports should wake white people up to the black threat. But because white people are such idolatrous dolts(or idolts), they worship black athletes as 'heroes' and 'demigods'. They worship the athletic victory of the very power(black muscle advantage) that is beating up white guys and castrating them of manhood.
Furthermore, let's not forget that racial stereotypes have always been with us. Hollywood won't make stuff like BOAN anymore because blacks are now 'sacred cows' in the West. But Jewish Hollywood made so many movies about evil 'terrorist' Muslims in the 90s and 2000s(with hardly any protest from progs and Jews who, btw, funded most of them). If anything, these movie stereotypes about Muslims were far more over-the-top than anything in BOAN. RULES OF ENGAGEMENT goes so far as to suggest that no Muslim, man-woman-or-child, is trustworthy, and when push comes to shove, they must all be mowed down to the last man-woman-and-child. No wonder then that most Americans didn't care about Bill Clinton and Madeline Albright starving 100,000s of Iraqi children to death in the 1990s. (Israel has been condemned by the world community for its imperialism and tyranny, but can anyone imagine US politicians calling for sanctions on Israel to kill 100,000s of Jewish kids? Democrats and Republicans agree that Jewish lives are more precious than Muslim lives.) Jewish Hollywood remade RED DAWN as a yellow peril fantasy of North Korea(a nation with 1/40th the economy of South Korea) invading the US. And even though Jews are among the biggest sex-slavers in the world, it made movies like TAKEN where Muslims are the main sex traffickers. Yes, Muslims have been involved in sex-grooming, but who enslaved all those Slavic women in Israel to be used a sex slaves? Jews. Hollywood won't be making a movie or TV show about that anytime soon. And consider all the delirious anti-Russia movies being cranked out by Hollywood.
Also, even though BOAN was wrong about certain facts of history, globo-homo depiction of current reality is even more surreal. According to the recent Gillette ad, it is white guys who are sexually harassing 'women of color', and it is the noble black guy who comes to the rescue of the damsels. Anyone who knows real reality that black guys are the kings of 'toxic masculinity'. Rap is black. Black men are top rapists and attackers of women. Also, given that women are into 'muh pussy' and slut pride culture, it's amusing they are ones to bitch about 'toxic' anything. We live in a world where the Jew-run media would have us believe in the Russia Collusion fantasy. That's what passes for Real News. These people who can't even get current reality right dare to condemn BOAN for not getting history correct. As the recent Covington Highschool Kids incident and Jussie Smollett 'hate hoax' anti-white defamation stunt have well-illustrated, the Jew-run media have no interest in the truth. Only in their procrustean Narrative to sustain 'white guilt' and white cuckery so that whites will go on bowing down before Jews and doing their bidding.
Interestingly enough, even though Jewish Hollywood has been peddling anti-Muslim 'terrorist' tropes forever, if you go searching for "hollywood anti-muslim propaganda", the result is usually videos about 'Trump is anti-Muslim'. https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=hollywood+anti-muslim+propaganda In fact, it's difficult to find any video on Youtube that details the history of Jewish Hollywood's negative depictions of Arabs and Muslims. Jews spread anti-Muslim hatred and steered US foreign policy to destroy Muslim nations, but they are now pretending to be champion-defenders of Muslims against 'American racism and Islamophobia'. These are the very same Jews who use whore-politicians to push through anti-BDS laws that rob us of our freedom of speech and conscience. https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/la-et-hollywood-values-updates-how-hollywood-s-muslim-portrayals-1483650479-htmlstory.html
Look all around us and we live in a world of Global Village Idiots or GVI. Even many Libs agree that the culture is inundated with excess of PC, a household term for several decades. Bill Maher had a show called POLITICALLY INCORRECT to highlight the importance of free speech and independent voices. But then, it was mostly a conceit as he never deviated much from its core tenets. He was either a faker or, when push come to shove, a company man.
In some ways, globalism has done wonders in spreading technology and knowledge all around the world. But it has also spread idiocy and degeneracy in equal or greater measure. It's gotten to the point where the elites are hardly more elevated culturally than the hoi polloi. Elites might as well be called the haute polloi. (In turn, the lower orders, in their addiction to fantasy and drugs, have become just as decadent as the spoiled rich wallowing in perversion.) In the past, when urbanites were mindful of class prerogatives and respectability, they could justifiably feel superior(at least culturally and intellectually if not morally or spiritually) to the rubes in small towns and villages. They were well-educated, refined in manners, and versed in arts & ideas. In contrast, the rubes had folk music, broken fiddles, and overalls for fashion. To an urban sophisticate, even a normal villager would have seemed hardly distinguishable from the village idiot. In those days, to leave one's village and make something of oneself in the cosmopolitan world was to be elevated.
But now, urban centers shamelessly wallow in degeneracy, stupidity, and idiocy spread by satellite media all around the world. People in the West and their eager imitators in the Non-West get all excited about a bunch of parading homos and associate what homos and trannies do(such as homo fecal-penetration and penis-and-ball-cutting) with the 'rainbow'. If a man dons a wig and says he's a 'woman', we better believe it.... but if he changes his mind a few weeks later and insists he's a man again, we better go along again. If we refuse the offer, it means we are not only backward & less-evolved idiots but evil and 'hateful'. By the commands of our 'betters' who control academia, media, and the state, we are supposed to believe that Covington Highschool produces neo-KKKids while the Black Israelites are nice fellas quoting from the Bible and preaching 'equality'(according to CNN). And BLM must be true because there are, of course, so many white KKKops prowling around da Hood to gun down innocent black kids. Never mind that murder rates spiked after the police retreated from black parts of Baltimore and Chicago. It's Inverse Reality that is fed to us by Global Village or GV media.
Today, being part of the globalist community is to be an idiot sucked into virtual reality controlled by Jewish oligarchs and deep state agents. What passes for fashion according to GV? Tattoos, piercing, green hair. And how does one make a political statement? Go into permanent PMS mode with 'pussy hats' and vagina-costumes. And, what kind of shows do urbanites(the 'best educated', most intelligent, and 'most evolved' among us) watch? Stuff like Lena Dunham's GIRLS, now replaced by even worse trash. This is sophistication according to rules of GV. This is 'intelligent', 'woke', and 'edgy'... or 'more evolved'. Honestly, it makes bumpkins in overalls look downright respectable and classy by comparison. Being a member of the cosmopolitan urban community used to mean having class, refinement, and kultur. In the present, it really means you're just a Global Village Idiot.
Furthermore, the notion of 'global village' is misleading because it implies the meeting of hearts and minds of ALL THE WORLD on the basis of equal opportunity to say their say. Actually no, GV doesn't work like that. In reality, Global Village is an electronic artificial bubble created and sustained by Media Monopolies. Being part of Global Village doesn't mean you're part of a larger humanity who are all equal in voice and power. It means you are part of a Virtual Village or Gay-Trix manufactured by a handful of media conglomerates that get to decide what is 'real' or 'unreal' for the Village Sheeple.
So, what is REAL news and FAKE news in the GV or GVV(global-virtual-village)? Most of us with a modicum of sense and experience(and less amnesia) know not to trust 'reality' as defined by the GV media. We know GV is about Elite Media power, not Middle Median power. So, the elites(fatally biased due to ethno-domination of Jews) deign to tell us what is truth and what is false. Elites design the props of this virtual bubble we've all been sucked into. According to GV, Russia Collusion is real. CNN and MSNBC are trustworthy news sources while Alex Jones peddles conspiracy theories. Now, Jones has often been a kook, but have CNN and MSNBC really been better? In a Truth Village, we'd have to agree that most of mainstream media does little but peddle conspiracy theories to serve the Power that is overwhelmingly globo-homo-shlomo. But truth doesn't count in GV because WE do NOT get to control the levers that prop up the virtual illusion of Global Village. The elites do.
According to the GV propaganda machine, the US is a nation where poor helpless blacks are set upon by the KKK and neo-Nazis. In truth, racial violence is almost entirely black on white. But because Global Village Idiots are mentally and emotionally weaned on the 'surreality' of GV, they believe in falsehood as their favored 'reality' and disbelieve in truth as 'triggering'(or prickly to the Comfort Bubble they've become so accustomed to). Kids raised on PC are like Bubble Boys and Girls. They are germ-freaks when it comes to fresh ideas and views that may infect their bubble world of correct thought. (To be sure, one reason why Jewish urbanites and Libby-dib gentrifiers rhapsodize about the supposedly noble and wonderful blacks is to create a moral smokescreen for their not-so-hidden agenda of driving black criminal elements out of the city. In order for Jews, fancy homos, and hipster-yuppies to push dangerous black underclass elements out, they must create the illusion of comity & camaraderie among the two communities while pretending that Trump and MAGA types are the cause of all the woes in the black community. By flattering blacks while scapegoating ‘rednecks’, the very people -- mostly Jews, homos, and yuppies -- who are socio-economically engineering the mass relocation of blacks get to work under moral cover. They wear Atticus Finch masks while carrying out Bull Connors work. For sure, Bill Clinton was able to lock up tons of black criminals precisely because he disarmed the Negro community with his shtick as the ‘first black president’. Same trickery prevails in Middle East Policy. Notice that the more the US goes about smashing Muslim nations, the more it pretends to care about the welfare of Muslims. In the 80s and 90s when the US was less involved in the Middle East, there were all these Muslim-as-terrorist movies. Now that the US has been invading, intervening, and smashing the Muslim world, there is much oh-so-precious condemnation of ‘Islamophobia’.)
According to the 'narrative logic' of the Global Village or GV, Jews are forever the Holocaust People who need protection when, if anything, they are the dominant power in the US and the most deadly & destructive force in the world. GV says the US needs to stay in Syria to protect Israel when, in reality, it is Israel that has been bombing Syria and aiding ISIS & Alqaeda there. GV tells us that US is a 'liberal democracy' but Congress just passed a bill that criminalizes BDS and Justice for Palestinians. So much for free speech and freedom of conscience. Jewish Power hates white Americans, but white Americans, having been sucked into the Conzo version of GV, act as if Jews and white Christians are the best of friends. LOL. Jews claim to care about Muslims who are held in contempt by 'Islamophobic' white Christians, but it was Jewish Hollywood that spread the Muslim Terrorist trope and it was Zionists who insisted on Wars for Israel that destroyed millions of Muslim lives. As for Palestinians, they hardly show up on the GV radar.
Now, things would look differently if the global village were truly democratic and equal. After all, on the ground level, there are people on both Right and Left who know the truth about the Palestinian situation. But GV ignores and even suppresses such individuals who dare speak the truth. Free thinkers are shunted to alternative outlets, but then GV works tirelessly to have even those shut down. Consider what GV tried to do to GAB. Apparently, GV gets to decide what is 'hate speech', therefore not free speech. AIPAC's calling for hatred against Iran, stealing of more Palestinian land, and support for apartheid-like policies in West Bank is not Hate. But if you denounce Zionist imperialism, that is 'hate'. Because GV says Jews are a protected group, the implication is Jewish supremacism is a protected supremacism. Now, what happens when the 'protected' Jews oppress the 'protected' Muslims? Since Jews are oppressing 'protected' Muslims, shouldn't we call out on Jewish supremacism? But then, as Jews are 'protected' too, it just gets more complicated... and ludicrous. It's like the conundrum when a 'made' guy in the Mafia kills another 'made' guy? What is to be done? Well, I guess some people, esp Jews, are 'more protected' than others.
In a true Global Village that would treat all peoples the same, our impressions of the world would be drawn equally from Palestinians, Syrians, Iranians, and Russians as from globo-homo media conglomerates controlled by Jews and their cuckatoo puppets. But despite the tireless efforts of independent voices to spread truth and justice, they have no control over the levers of GV that still dominates world discourse. The World according to GV is defined and shaped by the venal Deep State. Across borders, it's like the Seep State because US influence seeps into EU and many parts of the world. So, how well-grounded in reality is GV engineered by the Deep State?
Well, what does this globo-homo Deep State tell Europeans about the likely consequences of mass-immigration-invasion? Europeans are assured that hundreds of millions of African migrant-invaders will do wonders for the Continent. That's 'reality' according to GV for you. Now, if people arrived at an honest assessment of Africa(and why it is the way it is) and Europe(and why it is the way it is), they would realize that tons of Africans in EU will wreck the whole continent. That would be global reality. But the GV says otherwise. Why, all those blacks are Magic Negroes, and the future will be bright. The Daily Mail story below shows the difference between truth and falsehood. GV controlled by the Deep-and-Seep State tells whites that they should aspire to be cucky-wuck dads and daughters into ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs.
Why does GV command such power and authority among the elites, the people who really matter in controlling the world? One reason is status-vanity. Elite-educated people like to be associated with kultur, sophistication, and refinement(even in our Age of Degeneration), and GV controls respectable opinion outlets like NYT, New Yorker, Atlantic, and etc. In truth, those are essentially little more than mouthpieces of the sinister Deep-Seep-State, but they still manage to maintain a veneer of 'class', 'prestige', and 'respectability'. Indeed, it is often less the product than the venue that determines worth in the eyes of the vain and shallow. So, even though HAMILTON the musical is trash, it played in respectable venues in NY and won the praise of all-the-people-that-matter, so the status-keepers and status-strivers all flocked to see it and agree as Global Village Idiots because blacks are magical and anything associated with Magic Negritude is miraculous. Remember that the critical community also praised New STAR WARS and BLACK PANTHER as great important works.
Also, GV owns the brands that matter. Harvard is a brand, so it doesn't matter that many of its graduates and bigshots have been some of the most destructive, greedy, and repulsive people on Earth. The brand counts, and most strivers, preferring status over integrity and truth, flock to fancy brands. As long as GV controls venues and brands, it can get away with tons of nonsense. Just consider. Homomania and Trannymania are ridiculous, BUT if the top institutions, brands, and venues promote and rhapsodize about them, gee... maybe they are really special. Notice even Charles Murray bent over to 'gay marriage', the silly bugger. And Terry Teachout is supposed to be a conservative critic of culture. That grotesque fat-body cried like a baby over HAMILTON and fumes about Russia because it won't bend over to globo-homo propaganda. What a worthless Fat-Cuck to Zion. Just another shill and Global Village Idiot or GVI.
Not sure Stalinism offers the best understanding of what is going on.
Communism had to be simple because it was about the pride of work, dignity of labor, simple virtues of proles. Back then, the bourgeoisie had all the privilege. Workers were barely literate or semi-literate. More literate in places like Germany but still less educated than the bourgeoisie with fancy taste and refinement. In the story of the princess and the pea, the girl notices the pea because she is really of royal background. If she were a true prole, she would have been content with a hard wooden bed with a bunch of peas. Just any place to sleep.
Especially because communism came to power in backward Russia(and later even more backward China), the themes had to be simplified even further. In USSR, communism was less about the workers inheriting wealth and property from the bourgeoisie(that had been hoarding it all) than about turning peasants into proles to build a modern economy. According to classic Marxism, the contradictions within capitalism would lead to revolution. But because capitalism would have already built a modern and wealthy economy, revolution would be about taking the loot of the rich and sharing them equally among the workers. Also, the workers would have collective ownership of factories, land, and resources. And with more leisure and less work, workers could lead moderate ‘bourgeois’-like lifestyles. They would work about 4 hrs and devote other time of the day to art, culture, ideas, and etc. The bourgeoisie would lose out as a class, but bourgeois-ness would remain as lifestyle. In habit, culture, and attitude, Marx was even more bourgeois than Adolf Hitler who was half-bourgeois and half-bohemian. He didn’t so much want to destroy everything bourgeois as elevate workers to a point where they too could partake of the good stuff enjoyed by the bourgeoisie.
No such luck for Russia and later China. When the Revolution happened, the majority were still dirt-poor peasants. Because there wasn’t much wealth to take from capitalists, a whole new economy had to be built. That meant the workers had to be driven to work even harder. They had to be tough. There was no time for nonsense. It was work, work, and build, build. So, naturally, the ideology had to be simplified for the masses. Trotsky scoffed at Stalin’s ‘second-rate’ intellect. Lenin and Trotsky were hyper-intellectuals. Marxist ‘Greeks'(as Nassim Taleb might describe them). Stalin was a Marxist ‘Roman’. He was about getting things done, and the fact was communism would have to build a modern economy from ground up as there wasn’t one to take and inherit from the bourgeoisie(that was much smaller in Russia). And then, later Mao made Marxism even simpler because China was even more backward than Russia. In the Soviet Union(at least until the 60s when there were some burgeoning signs of a consumer economy), the main theme was about the basic needs of survival. It wasn’t about choosing which pastry and wine but having enough bread and water. US was much better off than the USSR, but then, universal prosperity didn’t arrive until about after two decades after WWII. At the turn of 20th century, majority of Americans were still on the farm. Great Depression and WWII led to hardships and shortages. After WWII, 50% didn’t have indoor plumbing. So, even though there was certainly more choice than in the USSR, most people had to do with basic stuff.
But from end of WWII to the present, US and Western Europe have continued without a great depression. There were some recessions(some serious) along the way, but life got easier for more people. With everyone taking substance for granted in a world where even poor people grow fat, style took precedence. And this goes for ideology as well. When a lot of people were hungry, the ideology was about bread. And when wars destroyed so many lives of common folk, the ideology was about peace. But there’s no shortage of bread. And recent wars have killed just a fraction of lives lost in WWI and WWII. And there’s no draft. So, ideology has turned into a game of personal choice. It’s like shopping for various kinds of cheese, wine, candy, chocolate, and etc.
Oddly enough, consumerist mentality went better with leftist ideology. This seems counter-intuitive because capitalism was on the ‘right’ and socialism was on the ‘left’ during the Cold War. But if leftists are more likely to complain, nitpick, bitch, and fuss about social problems, it means their mentality is more like that of the finicky consumer with ‘customer is king’ mentality. Jews are known for haggling and negotiating things down to the last penny. Homos are known for being fussy and bitchy about everything. They are less likely to be content with any product. So, the consumer who is never content with any product and the progressive who is never content with society share the same kind of mentality. In a society where consumerism is king, leftism was bound to take on features of consumerism. So, today’s ‘progressivism’ is different from yesterday’s when the theme was Bread for Every Man. Same bread for every man? How boring. Just like consumers want lots of choice among various breads, cookies, and pastries, the new ‘progressivism’ is like 31 flavors of Ice Cream. Even within homo ideology, there is ‘gay’, ‘lesbian’, ‘bi’, ‘trans’, ‘queer’, and many more. And people can mix and match their grievance products. So, a New Muslim can intersect his identity with ‘gay’ identity, feminism(which also comes in many flavors such as slut pride, vagina mania, corporate feminism, etc), and immigrant-identity(legal, illegal, undocumented, New American, New Jews, etc). Just like there are many kinds of Comfort Food, there are now many kinds of Grievance Products.
And capitalists appreciate this PC branding. As rich folks and big corporations are always worried about being called out for being greedy and profit-obsessed, how convenient for them to market grievance-approved products… like Gillette that is against ‘sexual harassment'(all by white men) and Nike that features Kaepernick. That way, they can rake in the dough while posing as ‘caring’. And the fussy consumer mentality and griping ‘progressive’ mentality fuse into one. Some snotty consumer who wants to buy the very best is also glad to know that the product is buying is also ‘woke’. It flatters both his status and standing. In a way, corporations appreciate micro-complaining and micro-bitching. Such gives them more of a rationale to crank out new and improved products. Sometimes, the new stuff is indeed better. Other times, like so many variations of smart-phones, it’s mostly hype to rake in more bucks.
Your average conservative is more likely to be ‘socialist’ in his tastes and outlook. He is more likely to focus on basic needs and basic values. Less likely to be fussy wussy about the very best. Less likely to complain that not everything is as he wants it. But people who are content with basic bread and stuff make less demanding consumers who want more and better. Can anyone imagine John Wayne character complaining that his coffee ain’t the fancy kind? In contrast, homos are always bitching about everything, and they can be a real pain in the ass. But you have to give credit where it’s due, and so much of improvement in consumer goods was driven by people who always found faults in something. Germans were hardy but also extremely thorough, which made them obsessed about creating the ever-more-perfect machine or system. It’s no wonder they built a greater economy than Russia with all its resources. Culture of Complaint can do some good… in the right measure.
Since the beginning of time, mankind has been fascinated with the Light. Egyptians worshiped the Sun god. The Sun is central to Japanese mythology. Indeed, it’s difficult to think of a people or culture, ancient-medieval-modern, that hasn’t been profoundly inspired by the Sun in art, mythology, and science. Before there was a division of astronomy and astrology, two were one and the same. Astronomy moved from geocentrism to heliocentrism. And astrology has strange relationship with the Sun. Without the Sun, there would be no life on earth, no humans to gaze at the sky and read the stars. But then, the stars are visible only to the side of the Earth turned away from the Sun. The effect of the Sun from dawn to dusk is not unlike the effect of monotheism. The Sun is so bright and dominant that every last vestige of the starry sky vanishes soon after sunrise. The impact of the rise of universal-monotheism(derived from Judaism), especially of Christianity and Islam, has had a similar effect on the spiritual imagination of humanity around the world. Across Europe and Middle East(as well as what became ‘Latin America’), so much of pagan cultures and gods has been wiped out. But just as stars always return in the night to the side of the Earth that is asleep, perhaps there was something to what Carl Jung said about how the pagan gods and spirits are still within our buried psyches. Though vanquished from the conscious mind by the coming of the One God, they lingered in the hidden corners of the mind, re-emerging at times to inspire creativity and vision, as during the Renaissance and the Romantic Era. It’s like what Merlin says in EXCALIBUR: "The days of our kind are numberèd. The one God comes to drive out the many gods. The spirits of wood and stream grow silent. It's the way of things. Yes... it's a time for men, and their ways." And then later... "You(Arthur) brought me back... Back to where you are now. In the land of dreams."
Just like there will always be nights brimming with stars, there will always be an unconscious realm independent of conscious will & knowledge; and in this world of dreams, the dead, exiled, or forsaken gods whisper in our ears once again. Some people partake of prayer, meditation, or, exorcism to purge this deeper realm of the mind as a kind of ‘hell’ inhabited with demon spirits, i.e. apparently, it wasn’t enough to slay the pagan gods and hurl them into the dark pits of one's soul; the dark areas of one's soul must be scoured of the every last trace of paganism or ‘demonism’, not unlike what a doctor does with radiation and chemotherapy to destroy as many cancer cells as possible. But what may be deemed as cancerous or wicked by some is the very stuff of creativity, vision, poetry, and imagination to others. Indeed, is it an accident that the three great creative eras of the West since the Fall of Rome had to do with either the re-emergence of paganism and/or the fading of monotheism’s grip on the culture? Renaissance, Romanticism, and Modernism. Monotheism has done wonders for prophets, but polytheism or paganism has been more friendly to poets. And yet, oddly enough, the rise of Modernism, though seemingly most at odds with Monotheism, eventually led to a kind of neo-monotheism or secular-monotheism. One reason is Judeo-Christo-Islam and Science/Math have one thing in common in seeking the one-and-only truth. Monotheism requires one to believe that God is the only True God. If other gods are also valid, then Monotheism has no legitimacy. Likewise, science seeks the one truth. Unless there is a single set of universal laws of nature that governs the cosmos, science becomes pointless. While there have been many competing scientific hypotheses, they have all sought to discover which one is true, thereby proving all others false. For example, the Lamarckian hypothesis lost out to the Darwinian one, and certain elements of Darwinism have been discarded over the years by theories backed with more advanced experimentation. Because science has gained such prestige, even non-scientific fields have sought to imitate scientific methodology and terminology, resulting in an intellectual phenomenon called ‘scientism’, which isn’t really science but has its outward appearance. (The most dangerous quacks speak the language of medicine.) Then, it is not surprising that everyone from Karl Marx to Josef Stalin to Sigmund Freud to Carl Jung to Herbert Spencer to Adolf Hitler all claimed to speak in 'scientific' terms. Since science is about rejecting all false assumptions and hypotheses in search of the one true theory, such mental habit also came to define the rationalist scientism of ‘social sciences’ and modern ideologies. Then, it is no wonder that Modernism was both liberating and limiting. Initially, it led to the explosion of freedoms unthinkable earlier. But in its imitation of science, so much in the arts, architecture, music, literature, and social commentary came to insist that a certain form, method, or narrative was THE true one. Even though such attitudes emerged in opposition to the old dominant Idea or Narrative, the New Way was less about freedom than about the replacement of the old dogma with the new doctrine, even at the expense of eradicating future freedom to think differently and independently. Then, it’s hardly surprising that so much of the humanities is now more about technical jargon and 'correct' consensus than about personal and individualistic thinking on various matters. Even in discussion of popular entertainment, consider that so many critics now have a box-mentality that obliges them to praise certain works because of their subject matter and ideology. They might as well all be programmed NPC's. Possibly, the counter-appeal of Nietzsche and Heidegger owes to their rejection of quasi-objectivism that took hold of so much since the advent of science and technology. Objectivity, so essential to science, contracts, legal justice, and journalism, is easily corrupted in areas that are inherently subjective. When English Department that largely deals with fiction & poetry adopts an all-knowing ideology of PC, it creates the illusion that literature must be neatly divided into ‘correct’ and ‘incorrect’, i.e. those in line with the official PC ideology is ‘good’ while those outside it are ‘bad’. Over time, this ideological ‘objectivization’ leads academics to favor bad literature that is ‘good’ over good literature that is ‘bad’.
Even as the humanities came to reject traditional standards and ‘conventional’ criteria of what is good or bad, it came to adopt ideological standards(as a form of new objectivism) of what is approved as opposed to what is ‘unacceptable’. This has affected general discussion as well, which is why anyone who speaks the truth about black crime or racial differences between blacks and non-blacks — just ask James D. Watson — is relegated to pariah-status, whereas total fantasies such as Wakanda(of BLACK PANTHER), BLM hysteria(that evil white cops are gunning down random blacks), and Hate Hoaxes(usually as acts of anti-white defamation carried out mostly by Jews and blacks) are approved, promoted, and even ‘sacralized’. But then, we live in a world where we are to believe that homo fecal-penetration is just as biologically legit as real sex between man and woman involving proper interaction of relevant organs; we are also to believe that if a man puts on a wig and says he’s a ‘woman’, then he is indeed a ‘woman’, but if few months later, he changes his mind and says he’s a man again, he’s a man.
It was bad enough when objectivism affected fields that are, by and large, subjective. While art cannot thrive without standards and some degree of consensus, there is no objective scientific law that can prove that Beatles REVOLVER is better than Rolling Stones’ AFTERMATH. Now, most people with good sense would know the Beatles were better than Herman’s Hermits, but their reasoning must still be made from a subjectivist viewpoint because so much of art appreciation has to do with one’s personal and emotional responses. Also, even though we know that a well-trained classical violinist is a better musician than some high-school violinist, art is more than about technical skills. Indeed, a less conventionally good singer may do more for a song. Maybe Celine Dion could have sung "Landslide" in a ‘better’ way, but Stevie Nicks, with a voice so uniquely bewitching, owns that song as composer and performer.
So, the realm of humanities should never have been infected with ideological objectivism, especially one as confused as PC that, on the one hand, claims to be committed to multiple perspectives against the Mono-Narrative, but then, on the other hand, insists that all perspectives must be converge on globo-homo-ism and be ‘intersectonal’, which really means that all groups must express themselves in ways that lionize Jews, homos, and/or Negroes while blaming all the bad stuff on ‘cis-gender white males’.
But something even stranger happened following the ‘objectivization’ of the humanities and English Department. Because Movies and TV do so much to convey an impression of shared reality and because so many journalists start out as English Majors, subjectivism(the stuff of art and fiction) has also seeped into what should be the objectivity of journalism and the law. Just consider: Today, Arts & Entertainment must conform to the mono-objectivism of PC. This goes from the haute Art World down to comic books for kids. So, we have Art Galleries selling million-dollar piles of junk about ‘patriarchy’ or ‘my liberated vagina’, and we have Archies comic book where the hero sacrifices his life to save a saintly homo from a deranged ‘homophobe’. Once the subjective humanities were turned ‘objective’ via PC ideology, they became a socio-political tool. Since journalism is about objective coverage of world events and trends, it began to take cues from the humanities that now claimed to have an objective grasp on society, justice, politics, and truth. Subjective was made ‘objective’, and in turn, objective was made ‘subjective’. It’s on wonder that so much of what passes for journalism today is about ‘muh feels’ that are now baked into the hearts and minds of anyone who attends college. Just consider: Obama as ‘the one’, Homomania as new faith, ‘gay marriage’ as legitimate, a man with wig is a ‘woman’, Russian Collusion Hoax, Trump is ‘literally Hitler’, Wakanda is truth, New STAR WARS is better than ever because ‘diversity’, ‘hate speech’ is not free speech, and etc. It’s gotten so ludicrous that even some on the Political Left are beginning to dump on the Lunacy:
(Jimmy Dore’s denunciation of the Russia Hysteria or Russysteria is most welcome and necessary, but he runs the same tired narrative on Joe McCarthy. While McCarthy was reckless and reached too far, a vast Soviet Network had sprung up in the US in government and cultural spheres during the FDR years. That was no joke, no fantasy. Even big shots like Harry Dexter White and Alger Hiss were communist spies. Rosenbergs and Morton Sobell funneled atom bomb blueprints — the most carefully guarded secrets in the US — to Stalin’s empire, the destroyer of millions of lives and occupier of Eastern Europe. And there were real communists and Soviet spies in media, entertainment, and academia. So, why have so many influential Jews, especially in academia and media, attacked McCarthy and the ‘Red Scare’ over the yrs ? Because many of the radicals and Soviet spies were Jews. That is why even non-communist Jews circled the wagon for the sake of Tribal Solidarity and spread the counter-hysteria that the ‘Red Scare’ had all been paranoid ‘hysteria’ when, in fact, there had been an extensive communist cabal in the US that funneled tons of secrets to Stalin’s government. Today, Jews are doing the opposite. If Jews of yesteryear denounced anti-communism as mostly paranoia, they now concoct and spread utterly bogus hysteria about Russia. Why? Even though the tactics have changed, they both serve the same core objective: Tribal Jewish Power. In the past, Wasps controlled the US, and Jews even sided with communists to discredit the Establishment. Jews worked with subversives to decry the Establishment’s anti-radical measures as ‘rabid and virulent’. Today, Jews are the Establishment and fear any dissent against or subversion of their power. Jews work with the Deep State to silence, shut down, and blacklist any courageous dissenting voice as ‘hateful’, ‘divisive’, or ‘Russian’. Funny that these Jewish elites who show zero solidarity with the Nationalist Folks of America insist that the latter must stand in solidarity with the former. "You suck our dick while we cut off your balls." Why do Jews now hate Russia so much? In the 1990s, Jewish globalists economically looted Russia and nearly owned that country. But Vladimir Putin restored some national sovereignty and locked up a handful of super oligarchs who happened to be Jewish. THAT is why Jews hate Putin and Russia. It’s not about ‘liberal democracy’ but Tribal Supremacism. Jews think they should own and rule Russia like they’ve come to own and rule US, UK, and Canada. Also, Russia, along with Iran and China, is one of the few nations on Earth that remains somewhat independent of US that is controlled by EOJ or Empire of Judea. And so, Jews fear Russia as a model of goy Nationalist Resistance against Jewish globo-homo Hegemonism. That is why the Jew-run Media have cooked up this nonsense about Russia Hysteria. Indeed, isn’t it funny that the very Jew-run Media that berate Donald Trump as a puppet of Russia, a foreign nation, have no problem with his truly servile attitude toward Israel, another foreign nation? What does that tell you? It means Jews demand that white Americans prioritize Jewish interests above all else. And yet, there is a paradox. Even as Jews increasingly dump on white conservatives as the unifying object of hatred for Jews and People of Color, they also increasingly rely on white conservatives to support Jews and Israel because Grievance Politics among POC often turn against Jewish privilege and Zionist tyranny. With there being less support for Israel and growing criticism of white-Jewish privilege among the growing non-white base among Democrats, Jews will have to depend more on support for Israel among white conservatives. Jews will have to increasingly rely on the very people they denigrate most in the media. But can Jews expect continued support among white conservatives when the latter is beginning to wake up to the fact that most virulent forms of anti-white-ism originates from Jews?)
Anyway, here we are in the 21st Century following the tumultuous 20th Century, the most notable developments of which was (1) Rise of USA as the premier world power and (2) Jewish takeover as the premier elites of the US. So, the 21st Century began with the legacy of the 20th that Jews on top of the world. It began with Jews controlling the US that controls the world. And one key feature of that control is the Mono-media-ism or Mono-mediantics of the Jews. Jews control the media like the Sun itself. Especially in the age of electronic media, most people get the news, info, ideas, data, entertainment, and messaging through rays from movie screens, TV screens, smart-phone screens, computer screens, and etc. We are constantly exposed to these rays. There are over 330 million people in America — many more if we include illegals — , and everyone has one or more TV’s, PC computers, laptops, smart-phones, and other such devices. And Hollywood still rakes in billions every year because so many young people flock to theaters with its giant electronic screens. And cities are increasingly covered with electronic advertisement.
Now, because we purchase and possess our own devices, there is a sense of autonomy and independence. After all, you watch your program on your TV, and I watch my program on my TV. You look for your news on your computer, and I look for my news on my computer. And yet, all these devices are useless on their own. They are merely hardware designed to relay or play something made by someone else. And for most of us for most of the time in most places, everything we are watching is made by a handful of people in NY, LA, and few other key centers. A handful of corporations controlled by oligarchs of a Certain Tribe get to decide who gets hired, what gets written, what gets made and who makes them, and how they are marketed. So, paradoxically, the fact that we own our devices has turned all of us into mental-sensual-and-emotional slaves of a handful of corporations controlled by World Jewry and their Homo agents. (Tootkins have gained much because they are experts of subtle finger-work in an economy that is increasingly less dependent on brawny arm-and-leg work of the working class. Appreciation of finger-work is in inverse proportion to depreciation in arm-and-leg work. There is still, however, some use of handiwork.) We own the devices, but Jews control the light that comes through them. Thus, we are all exposed to the Jew-Ray or J-Ray. Jewish Power owes much to their control of the Light of Modernity. Prior to electricity and rise of modern mass media, most goyim relied on local community for values, ideas, and information. Also, as there was far less centralization of society and nation, there were many media outlets, and often, local news and affairs took precedence over the Grand Narrative. Furthermore, news and ideas didn’t travel instantly and uniformly. But with the rise of electronic media, everything began to change. Those who controlled the signals could reach millions upon millions, then tens of millions upon tens of millions, then hundreds of millions upon hundreds of million, then billions upon billions... and uniformly and instantly. It began with sound with the advent of radio. Cinema emerged before radio, but one had to actually go to the movies. It didn’t follow one home. Also, even though cinema depended on electricity, film reels had to be physically transported from theater to theater. In contrast, the radio was in the house, possibly in every room. And then came the TV that combined sound & image and soon found its way into every home, then just about every room. Everyone owned his or her own TV but had NO control over what he or she saw. He or she became spellbound with the rays emanating from the screen. Through those rays, he or she found much entertainment and joy. He or she received much essential information and news. Through documentaries, he or she learned about other parts of the world. So much was for the good. But he or she came under the spell of those who monopolized the Light and turned them into rays that would alter minds and transform(or deform) souls all across the world. In DIE NIBELUNGEN, the Jewish-like dwarfs gain control of the Rhine Gold and then fashion a Ring of Power out of it to control the world.
Jews have gained supremacy with money, gold, and diamonds. But their power over us has to do with their control of Light. Prior to the rise of electricity, Light belonged to the Sun, the stars, and man's control of fire. Nighttime was lit by torches, firewood, or candles. For a time, city streets were lit with gas lamps. And then, with the coming of electricity and the light-bulb, nighttime became universally lit for everyone, at least in the First World. Humanity no longer depended on the Sun or on unreliable & often dangerous fire for radiance. With a flick of the switch, nighttime could be as bright or even brighter than the day. But, electricity didn’t merely light up the night or run machinery. It could be processed into signals to transmit enticing semblances of sound and image. And with the radio(and later with TV), these signals could travel through the air without wire. There was no longer the need for cumbersome infrastructure, as with telephones prior to the advent of the Cell Phone. A media center with powerful antennae could transmit its signals to millions upon millions of people. And with satellite technology, a single media center could reach the entire world. Beatles’ performance of "All You Need is Love" was the first globally transmitted TV broadcast via satellite, but its real lesson was All You Need Is Light. Beatles sang the song, but Jews came to control the light, the rays emanating from the screens of countless TV screens all around the world.
It didn’t matter if your TV was made in US, Germany, or Japan. On its own, a TV set is nothing. It exists only to relay the Light transmitted via signals, and the power to create that Light for all the world came to be controlled by Jews. Jews understood that control of Light was more powerful than control of Gold.
In Greek mythology, Prometheus steals fire from the gods and gifts it to mankind. In Judeo-centric Historiography, St. Paul ‘stole’ the spirituality light of the Jews and passed it onto goyim. Zeus was angry with Prometheus and punished him forever(though the story of Heracles says he freed Prometheus from the torment). And we know that Jews never forgave Jesus and St. Paul for passing the Jewish God to the Gentiles. Likewise, as with Zeus and religious Jews, modern secular Jews are determined to maintain monopoly ownership of the Light. Jews want all of us to remain spellbound by the J-Ray. Jews also use Gay-Ray, or Propaganda of Homomania, to serve the J-Ray. Not only are homos the most loyal and zealous servant-partners of Jewish Power but Homomania complements Jewish Supremacism as both are predicated on Minority Elite Supremacism. If Jewish Light is the Sun of the Mass Media, Homo Light is its ‘rainbow’. Like the Sun vanquishes all the stars in the sky, Jewish Media Power works tirelessly to blot out and silence all alternative and counter-narratives. And the Jewish Sun seeds the clouds to produce cultural conditions conducive for the 'gay rainbow’, which has been associated with men who do homo fecal-penetration or tranny penis-cutting.
In a way, each of us is living in a TRUMAN SHOW. Our Jewish Master uses the power of Light to control our beliefs, values, and perimeters of what-is-permissible. We are trapped in two ways, like people in Peter Weir’s movie. Truman is trapped because he’s been duped into believing that his bubble-world is real. But then, people who are addicted to watching Truman are also trapped because, even though on the outside, their lives revolve around the life shaped and manipulated by Media Central. They are as addicted to Truman as Truman is anchored to his fake world. And even as they root for Truman’s escape, it all takes place within the bubble, and even after Truman's liberation, the viewers demand yet another show. It’s like they’ve been robbed of the inner light and inner life because they’ve become so accustomed to artificial worlds beamed to them on their TVs. Again, they own the TV’s but not what comes through them. Of course, as the movie was made by Hollywood, the villainous media mogul who would be god is a goy, but in the real world, we know that such figures are Jews.
We are bombarded with J-Ray, not the White Light. In all the religions and mythologies, God or gods own and control the light. Mankind could only hope to harness some of that light. Or it had to contend with unstable and dangerous fire that produced smoke or burned out of control... or was difficult to reignite in wind and rain. Just as mankind enviously eyed the magical flight of birds, it was filled with fear and awe of the power of God or gods over the Light. Indeed, consider the cultures that sacrificed so many innocents to appease the Sun god. Just like God or gods held tremendous sway over mankind that believed in Light as a divine source, Jews now have godlike power over us as they control the electronic light that transfixes virtually all of humanity. Even in nations where Jews don’t directly own and control the media, so many people demand more J-Ray from Hollywood and US mass media. After all, however vile and wicked Jewish Power may be, the fact remains that Jews are talented in creativity and, with their vast financial resources, scoop up talents from around the world. Jewish Hollywood makes a lot of crap, but it’s expensive good-looking crap, and that sure beats cheap-looking crap made by the rest of the world. The New STAR WARS is crap, but with a budget over $100 million, it looks better than space fantasy movies made for few millions, which is what the rest of the world can barely afford. With control of the Electronic Media, it’s as if Jews control the Sun of Modernity. Media might as well be called Sunstein.
Close Encounters of the Third Kind
Close Encounters - Mothership
Compared to the J-Ray of Sunstein media, dissident voices are like stars in the night. There are so many of them but disconnected from one another. Though there have always been dissident voices in a controlled democracy like the US, most remained invisible and unheard. Those that garnered some degree of attention did something outlandish, like anarchists who threw bombs at the police, individuals who assassinated politicians, extremist groups that either rioted or practiced strange rituals, and radicals-of-convenience selectively & momentarily exploited by the power. (Jew-run Mass media promoted the Westboro Church to defame anti-homo-agenda people as a bunch of deranged lunatics.) Obviously, if ‘fringe groups’ or extremist individuals do something really far-out or outlandish, they will get attention. But the Power will sometimes use certain radical individuals or groups as subversive or corrosive agents against rival Powers. A famous case of this was the Right-Wing German government use of Lenin and Bolsheviks to undermine the nationalist government in Russia. Germans, in their short-term interests, figured communist takeover of Russia was worth it if it assured German victory on the Eastern Front. Generally, the Power seeks to maintain respectability and avoids appearing extreme, unseemly, or dirty. So, it will use the shadow government — CIA, FBI, NSA, etc — to do the dirty work under the cover of ‘official business’. Or, esp in Third World nations(but also in first ones), the Power will use its ties with the underworld to carry out certain deeds. CIA had ties with the Mafia, and Zionists worked with gangsters like Meyer Lansky to pull strings. Or, the Power will selectively favor certain radicals to do its bidding while claiming plausible deniability. We see this in how Jewish Power uses Antifa to shut down dissident voices on the Right. Even as the Power denies direct links between itself and Antifa thugs, it pulls strings to ensure that the police and courts will go lightly on Antifa gangs. Thus, Antifa has essentially become the para-military force of the globo-homo power.
Jewish Power also works like the mafia in this regard: It runs an Extortion Racket as a Protection Program. But of course, you must pay off the Jews and/or serve them in order to have protection from none other than them. Jews make you an offer you can’t refuse. Jews use para-gangster organizations like SPLC, ADL, and AIPAC as moral covers to do their bidding. These groups veil their activities in the guise of Moral Crusade to pressure politicians, social critics, artists, entertainers, and businessmen into sucking up to Jews and supporting Israel. If anyone refuses to go along, the groups work in tandem with the Jew-run media to smear the American Refusenik as a ‘hater’, ‘extremist’, ‘white supremacist’, ‘anti-Semite’, and etc. Jewish Power has been so effective in this that cucking to Jews has become almost second-nature among prominent whites. Just look at Mitt Romney, the worthless dog of the Jews. Donald Trump pumped himself as a proud and tough white man, but look at him recently. He has Zionist cum drooling down the side of his lips. He looks like he’s been rammed in the ass by Chuck the Buttfuc* Schumer.
Anyway, whereas Jewish Media Power is like the powerful Sun whose rays cover all the world and own all the sky(as stars and the Moon are rendered invisible), dissident voices are like the dispersed stars in the sky. There are so many stars in the night, but the sky remains dark because there is no unity among the stars. Due to the internet, there are now more stars than ever. Unlike in the past when few corporations controlled all the media, anyone has the chance to become an known entity via the internet. As such, he or she can disseminate ideas disapproved by the Power. Indeed, this is the crucial difference between Established Electronica and New Electronica. With TV, the flow of images and sounds was only in one direction. It was from Media Central to all of us. We received but never returned information(except through ‘letters to the editor’). Also, there were limited means by which people could communicate with one another and form their own networks. Mostly, people talked to friends and family on the phone or sent letters. It was just person-to-person. But with the rise of the internet, a single voice on the internet can win over numerous fans. And there are eccentrics like PewDiePie who has tens of millions of followers on Youtube. Thus, in some ways, the stars in the sky are getting brighter and brighter. Meanwhile, the Sunstein seems to be dimming as more and more people, especially young ones, tend to rely more on peers and personalities on the internet for information than on official sources or establishment figures that, especially for people on the Right, have lost so much credibility, mainly because being so subservient to Jewish Power and addled with PC dogma has rendered most journalists into mere tools of the Power. One would have to be dumb, dishonest, demented, or deranged with worship of power-for-power’s-sake to take anything by the so-called mainstream media seriously. It’s just more Jewish globo-homo propaganda. In contrast, despite their limited resources and access to sources, many dissident, eccentric, or unique people on the internet can speak their minds and offer frank assessments of what may be REALLY going on.
Thus, Sunstein is dimming while the stars are burning ever more brightly. Still, the balance of power is with Sunstein. Also, the internet, like big media, has fallen into the hands of Jewish globo-homo supremacists. How did Jews manage to take over the internet? They used the Old Hustle Trick. You know how the hustle works. Some guy pretends to be not so good at billiards and loses a few games. The other guy gains confidence and plays for higher stakes. And then, the hustler shows his true colors and cleans up.
Jews used the same trick with takeover of the internet. But then, Jews pulled the same stunt in their takeover of mass media. If Jews, prior to media takeover, had revealed their true intentions — that, with media power, they intend to promote anti-white hatred and infect whites with ‘white guilt’ and ‘white self-loathing’ — , would they have been allowed to take over? Of course not. So, what did Jews do? They pretended to be Good Americans who love to compose Christmas songs and make patriotic war movies & all those Western movies that pay tribute to white menfolk and womenfolk who conquered and settled the West. So, most whites came to see Jews as Good Patriotic Decent Americans and didn’t oppose Jewish takeover of the media. But when Jews finally had monopoly control of the media, they showed their true face and pushed one anti-white agenda after another.
Jews did much the same to take over the internet. Platforms, Search Engines, and Social Networks controlled by Jews gained dominance by claiming to be neutral. Remember Google’s motto used to be "Don’t Be Evil". It created the impression that Google would be fair to all and not rig things to favor certain groups or agendas over others. Indeed, if Google and Facebook had stated at the very outset what their ultimate agenda would be — favor globo-homo progs over conservatives, effectively censor search results(or ‘censearch’), use monopoly power to smear certain individuals and groups while protecting others with far more power and record of evil, etc. — , at least half of America would NEVER have signed up to use their services. But Google, Facebook, and other such platforms hustled us and sucked us all in with promise of neutrality and fairness. But once they gained monopoly control, they went about favoring certain figures, ideas, and agendas over others. Also, while Jew-run Google and Facebook shut down or shadow-ban any courageous white voice who speaks truth to power, certain groups are ‘protected’ from the same standards.
Jews would have us believe that these groups need special protection because they are so vulnerable, but it’s all bogus. It’s really about Protected Supremacisms. What honest person can deny that the main supremacisms in the US are Jewish, black, and homo? Jews control just about all elite institutions and industries that matter. Blacks use their superior muscle power to dominate sports and beat up whites all over in streets and schools. And homos have been elevated to neo-angel status in America. Queertianity has become a defacto compulsory neo-religion for all those who want to succeed in life. Also, it’s hilarious when Jews claim to oppose anti-Muslim speech because it’s ‘hate speech’. It was Hollywood Jews who made all those movies with Muslims-as-Terrorists that convinced so many Americans that 'Muzzies' are subhuman psychos. It was Jewish groups that pressured Americans into supporting Israel that has terrorized and tyrannized so many Palestinian Muslim lives. It was Jewish Neocons and Liberal Zionists who used Deep State and Big Media to make the US wage Wars for Israel that has destroyed millions of Muslim lives in Middle East and North Africa. Jews pull all this shit, but they got the gall to pretend that they are protecting vulnerable Muslims from ‘haters’. These are the same Jews who used mega-money and media power to make Congress pass the unconstitutional anti-BDS laws. Jews are truly vile and hideous in their hyper-hypocrisy. Sometimes, I wonder if Jews are simply disgustingly dishonest... or are they so full of themselves as the smartest, wisest, richest, most successful, most tragic(‘muh holocuast’), and most ‘progressive’(always pushing some nuttery as the new moral panic of the year) that they’ve become blind to their own perfidy and venality. Consider a vile lowlife scum like Bari Weiss:
Via the Hustle, Jews gained monopoly control of the internet. Granted, not all platforms are owned by Jews, but as even Big Goyim in Big Tech rely on Jewish finance, Jewish lawyers & judges, Jewish academia, Jewish-controlled Deep State, and etc., they have no choice but to play along. Just look at Jack Dorsey’s dorky cuck-face. He always looks weak and wussy like Brad Pitt after he was castrated by Hollywood and Angelica Jolie. He’s always looking over his shoulders to see if anything he says has the approval of ADL, a Jewish ‘protection racket’ that is always "making an offer you can’t refuse".
Jack Dorsey the Dorky Horsey
Or consider the pussy-wussy goy-boy at Cloudflare who denied service to Daily Stormer in hope of obtaining more shekels from Jewish Finance. Now, Andrew Anglin and Daily Stormer are shit, BUT when we look at the state the world is in, WHO did all the damage? Anglin the clown who posts ridiculous headlines on his site or Zionist globo-homo scum and their goy cuck-puppets who used financial trickery to rob trillions and waged Wars for Israel to wreck entire nations? And who has promoted all the ugly gangsta rap music that encouraged urban violence? Andrew Anglin never killed anyone. Timothy McVeigh killed 150. Bill Clinton and Madeleine Albright starved and killed 100,000s of Iraqi children in the 90s in service of Zionist Supremacism. And yet, the Jew-run media and their cuck-puppets would have us believe that the good citizens of Silicon Valley are working so tirelessly to shut down ‘hate’ that may destroy lives. This is funny coming from Google, a company that has major centers in Israel, a nation created via Nakba pogroms, a imperialist power that still occupies West Bank. Cuck-Duck Donald Trump says US troops will remain in Syria to protect Israel, but who is endangering whom? When was the last time Syria attacked Israel? In contrast, Israel has shot so many missiles and dropped so many bombs on Syria. Israel aided so many terrorists in Syria. Like the saying goes, "Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you."
If Trump wants to remain in Syria to protect it from Israel, that would make some sense. In fact, he keeps US soldiers in Syria to pin it down so that Israel can attack it more, but Trump and the Jew-run Sunstein media spin it as "US is protecting Israel from Syria and its allies." With Jews, you lose. I’m not the one to deny or disbelieve the core facts of Shoah or the Holocaust, but I’m beginning to see the need for Holocaust Realization. A Holocaust Realizer would be someone who finally realizes why something as horrific as Shoah befell Jews. Based on observations of Jewish supremacist behavior in the past 50 yrs, it isn’t difficult to understand why so many people were ‘antisemitic’ and hated Jews. While it’s possible that Jews of yesteryear were totally different from Jews of here-and-now, that is unlikely. Recent Jewish behavior strongly suggests why ‘antisemitism’ was so prevalent throughout European history. These Jews just don’t know when to quit. Pushy, deranged, contemptuous, and hateful, they are vicious and sadistic. Given them an inch, and they will go about totally destroying you and your people. Jews are essentially like Gypsies with higher intelligence. Also, the neuroticism arising from conflict between Jewish tribal supremacism and secular-universal moralism seems to have literally driven a third of them insane, a third of them cynical, and a third of them nihilistic.
Jews control the internet like they control the media, but there is, of course, one key difference. Given the nature of the internet, Jews cannot maintain total monopoly as with the Old Media. While Youtube can ban and censor many voices, it can’t suppress all voices. Also, the more that Big Tech companies censor or rig algorithms, word gets around that Jewish Geeks are up to no good, and this increases anti-Jewish animus and distrust among goyim. Also, the Jewish Monopoly’s censorship of elements of the Left that supports BDS is making more people(across the political spectrum) wake up to the hypocrisy of Jewish Power that claims to be ‘progressive’ and for the ‘little guy’ but is actually indistinguishable from the ugly Zionist supremacism of Sheldon Adelson and Thomas Friedman.
Also, because it’s less expensive to start an internet company than a traditional media company, even small players can enter the market and pose some degree of challenge to the big players. If Youtube censors too much, it will be a huge boost to a site like Bitchute that mostly eschews censorship. And despite all the Power’s effort to shut down Gab.ai as Free Speech alternative to Twitter, it’s still going and growing. And the reaction to Patreon’s banning of Sargon of Akkad goes to show that people have some power to push back against Big Tech in ways that readers and viewers didn’t have with Print and TV media.
Hopefully, the dissident stars in the night will burn ever more brightly as the Sunstein media dims and becomes overcome with sunspots. Sure, it has solar flares now and then to get people like Alex Jones de-platformed from every major site. Jewish Monopolies have the ultimate kill-switch on much of the internet. Furthermore, Jews use their control of Payment Processing to effectively silence voices and destroy lives by cutting off funds. Just like Zionist conquerors in the West Bank cut off water-supplies to Palestinians, Jewish monopolists cut off money supply to goyim they hate.
Jews also use Narrative Tyranny to have people they hate fired. In the current US, if someone is labeled as ‘alt right’ or ‘white nationalist’, he can be fired from any job. But if someone is an open Zionist supremacist who supports Wars for Israel, hatred against Russia & Iran, defamation of white people, and oppression of Palestinians, he faces no job risk. If anything, his Jewish supremacism will do wonders for his resume in climbing the corporate ladder or working for the Deep State.
Indeed, the US government passed a law that not only supports Zionist tyranny but penalizes anyone who supports BDS and justice for Palestinians against Zionist-supremacist-imperialist tyranny. In the current US, a sicko like Sheldon Adelson who called for the nuking of Iran gets to rake in billions of dollars and buy off whore politicians. But if you’re a white person who says, "It’s Okay to be White", Jews, their Antifa goons, and Anti-Fact shills in Cuck-Media will harass, bully, and threaten your place of employment to get your fired. THAT is how Jews behave. Just ask the Palestinians. If Jews treat a people as powerless and blameless as the Palestinians as subhuman, why would they treat YOU any differently? Jews wanted Palestinian land, and so, they pulled off all sorts of dirty tricks to dispossess Palestinians and humiliate them. Dirty Jews use the smokescreen of 'progressivism' and 'compassion for the disenfranchised' to hide their supremacism. It's just another manifestation of "Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you." By making so much noise about protecting the powerless, Jews hope that we won't notice that they are the Powerful who oppress the powerless. Just ask the Palestinians. Jews want total supremacy over the US and want whites to be their cuck-dogs forever. So, why would Jews with their monopoly power treat whites with ANY fairness or decency? Since when does a master treat a slave as an equal? Again, just ask the Palestinians, and they will tell you what Jews do to you once they gain supremacist power over you and your kind.
Is there a way by which the dissident stars can pull their lights together to form a Counter-Sun to the Sunstein Media? The White Light against the J-Ray? It won’t be easy, and truth be told, too many people on the Alt Right and Dissident Right lack the kind of prophetic vision, inspiration, and theory of justice to create a movement that pools all the lights together. What Lawrence said of the Arabs may apply to the Alt Right and Dissident Right as well: "...so long as the Arabs fight tribe against tribe, so long will they be a little people, a silly people, greedy, barbarous, and cruel, as you are." To lead a great movement, there has to be men of drive and ambition, but it can’t just be about ME, ME, ME. For awhile, people thought Richard Spencer might be the one to lead, but his spiled-brat selfishness as a player made it impossible for him to recruit and keep men of quality around him. He just ended up with second-raters or far-right lunatics.
But then, no great movement can be led by gentlemen. Jared Taylor is a respectable persona to those who know him, but a man who dares not to get his feathers ruffled won’t have what is necessary to form an army of true-believing warriors. When the right man finally arrives on the scene, maybe all the disparate and dispersed white lights in the sky will come together to form a light so bright and powerful that it will illuminate a new path for the white race. One wonders what might have been possible if Adolf Hitler and National Socialists had served as a bridge between the West(mainly UK and France) and the East(mainly Russia and Slavic nations). He could have been one of the greatest man that ever lived. Instead, by picking on Poland, he drove a wedge between Germany and UK/France. But he had a second chance as Germany prevailed over France in an easy victory. Hitler could still have worked to serve as bridge between the West and Russia, then an ally. But he turned on Russia, and that was the end of the dream. No man had so much of world history in the palm of his hand and then lost everything. But then, Hitler was born with a pathological personality, and maybe there was nothing to stop the madness in the long run. Men of inspiration tend to be eccentric and extreme in some way... but they must be fundamentally sane and sound of mind and spirit if they're to make a positive mark on humanity.
Even as Jews increasingly vilify white conservatives(scapegoats for all problems) as the unifying theme for Jews and People of Color, they also increasingly draw on white conservatives to support Jews and Israel, because, after all, Grievance Politics among the POC often turns against Jewish privilege and Zionist tyranny. Jews depend more and more on the water from the well they are poisoning. With decreasing support for Israel and growing criticism of white-Jewish privilege among the expanding non-white and radical-white base among Democrats, Jews have to depend more and more on white conservatives for unconditional support for Jews and Israel. The vile Anti-BDS law passed with near-total support from Republicans while only 40% support from Democrats. Jews will increasingly have to rely on the very people they denigrate most in media, academia, law, state, entertainment, advertising, and corporacracy. But can Jews be assured of continued support among white conservatives when the latter is beginning to awaken to the fact that it's the Jews who are leading the anti-white derangement syndrome among the POC? But then, Jews must shame and blame whites in order to make them serve Jews. After all, the default position of any people is to feel good about their own kind and serve their own interests. Naturally, white Christians and conservatives should serve white/Christian/conservative interests. To make them do otherwise, they must be made to feel that the Other is somehow superior, morally or spiritually, to themselves. And Jews have done this by implanting 'white guilt' into the souls of whites, both liberals and conservatives. Thus, whites feel morally tainted by history and seek redemption by serving the Holy Other. As far as white conservatives are concerned, serving Jews(and maybe blacks and homos) should be good enough, and so, they go out on a limb to appear as 'good for Jews'. But for Jews, this isn't enough because there is still the possibility that whites may change their minds one day... and then what? So, the ONLY way to ensure permanent Jewish domination is via Diversity. That way, with whites relegated to minority status in the US, they won't be able to use electoral-demographic majority power to topple Jewish supremacy. Jews want more Diversity because, deep down inside, they know Intersectionality is really about Gridlock among Goyim. Even within the Proglob camp, so-called intersectionality has led to Demolition Derby or Roller Derby among blacks, homos, women, white working class, browns, yellows, and etc. It's turning into Road Rage politics... like the movie CRASH that won Best Pic.
Anyway, it seems more and more whites are waking up to the fact of Jewish hostility towards them. An obvious case has been Ann Coulter who, in 2016, mocked GOP candidates for droning on and on about the 'fuc*king Jews'. For such awakened whites, we need to end mass immigration as soon as possible because loss of white majority will mean end of GOP, and then whites are lost for good. But whites should take cues from the Jews on the Art of Power. If a people need majority power to rule, how does one account for the fact that Jews, who are only 2% of the nation, totally rules the US? So, how can whites threaten Jewish power even if they lose majority status in the US? They can make Jews have a taste of their own medicine. Jewish 'progressive' line has been 'diversity and equality are good, while privilege is bad'. Okay, then whites should take the Jews at their word and side with the POC against the most privileged people in the US, the Jews. Jeremy Corbyn is doing this in the UK with hilarious reactions from the Jewish community. Jews in UK have been dumping on white Britons as 'racists' and demanding that whites welcome and embrace non-whites. Well, that is exactly what Corbyn's Labour did, and guess how the Jews are reacting? They are flipping out because most non-whites don't give a rat's ass about super-rich Jewish bankers, Israel, Zionist imperialism, and Holocaust-Cult-Forever. This is why the US would do best to get rid of the GOP, have all whites join the Democrats, and then have whites side with POC against the Deep State dominated by Jews, homos, and cucks. Then, the current elites can be brought down, and then, the ensuing chaos will bring back the Restart of History from the terrible 'End of History' of Fukuyama's naive idealization.
I suppose Jews still got the homo card. Homo Power is mostly white-male, and it is reliably on the side of Jews because vain homos love power and privilege. It's no wonder that 10% of DC is now homo. Homos go there to seek power, and Jews have elevated them(along with cuck-dog Mormons) to serve as the missionary arm of globo-homo hegemony. Thus, homos, along with Mormons, have played a big role in Wars for Israel and new 'cold war' with Russia. Homos + Mormons = Homormons. Homos not only love to serve the Power(that is mostly Jewish) but appreciate the fact that Jews have decided to make Homomania the substitute for Christianity, indeed the Cult of the New World Order. As for Mormons, most of them are just status-strivers and moral-materialists, i.e. their moralism is all about making money, and money is the highest good. Also, ashamed of their history as an odd cult and ever so eager to appear respectable to the current globo-homo ruling elites, Mormons will go out of their way to cuck hard. Salt Lake City Mormons are the favorite dogs of Goldman Sachs and dutifully voted for Obama and Hillary. Mormons are the Sheep State within the Deep State.
