Saturday, July 19, 2025

How Jews Could Have Been Blessed as Peacemakers But Chose to be Piece-Makers, Blowing Up the World Into Pieces

 "Blessed are the peacemakers" - The tragic missed opportunity of Jewish Talent.


What a great lost opportunity, the role that Jews around the world could have played in the post-Cold War order. If any people were poised to play this role, it was the Jews, especially in partnership with Anglos, the greatest empire builders in history. Anglos and Jews, more than any other people, on the basis of their traits, training, and trial-and-error, could have facilitated a New World Order of peace and prosperity for mankind. The tragic waste of this chance in history may yet lead to major crises in the 21st century that may rival the worst horrors of the last century. Hopefully, the emerging great powers will manage to deflect and defuse the confrontations provoked by the Jewish-Supremacist controlled West.

An obvious problem is the current nature of Jewish Power. It is in supremacist mode, made worse(and more complicated) as a hide-and-seek kind of supremacism, i.e. even as Jews devise and execute policies based on supremacist objectives with the backing of the white managerial class, they employ the smoke-and-mirrors of ‘wokeness’ to perpetuate the illusion that they, as the Eternal Holy Holocaust People, are the best friends of the ‘marginalized’ groups against the ‘far right’ and ‘white supremacism’.

In truth, it’s long been the case that most white(and goy) politicians in Washington D.C. have been little more than obedient dogs to their Jewish masters. It’s no wonder those brown-nosing cucks cheer on the mayhem in Gaza and the Judeo-Nazi alliance in Ukraine in total appeasement to the Jews as the Exceptional People. Yes, the very same Jews who hold endless conferences warning of the specter of evil-white-this and evil-white-that.
Of course, the bulk of Jewish ire isn’t directed at ‘Neo-Nazi skinheads’, an endangered species in the West(and nearly wiped out in Ukraine by the Russian military) but at any white person who wants out from the Maggie’s Farm of Jewish Supremacism overseen by the likes of Ben Shapiro, Bill Maher, Rachael Maddow, and Jonathan Greenblatt with their media bullwhips.

If you reject the Jewish-Supremacist-engineered White Nakba, aka the Great Replacement, and would rather preserve your homeland, you’re designated as ‘far right’, and if you want no part in wars instigated by Jewish Supremacists around the world, you’re likely an ‘isolationist’. (Remember that Neocons reviled MAGA, at least in its initial incarnation, mainly for its generally antiwar platform.) And if you name the Jewish Power, you are an ‘Anti-Semite’.
To demonstrate that you’re no such evil thing, you must support not only the idea of the Jewish Homeland(or nationhood for Jews, most of whom deny nationhood for goyim, especially Europeans and Palestinians) but also the endless Jewish or Zionist aggressions in any part of the world. And, keep pretending that Israel never does wrong, the corollary of which is that whatever Zionists do is right. (There you go, the Zionist definition of right-and-wrong. If Jews do it, it’s right. If Jews like it, it’s also right. If Jews dislike it, it’s wrong.)
For bonus points, one gets compared to Winston Churchill if one supports the Jewish proxy war in Ukraine against Russia, the conflict where Jewish Power has actively encouraged Ukro-Nazi forces. Things can hardly get more demented than this, but the madness goes on because virtually every white goy in elite position is a pitiful and pathetic dog of Zion.

Was it inevitable that Jewish Power would turn out this way? Perhaps, given the combination of Jewish ethno-religious tradition(with the Tribe as the Chosen of God) and Jewish self-perception of being smarter, stronger-willed, more devious(as honor is a dirty word for Jewish Power), and bigger-minded than other groups.
Even so, supremacist tendencies are usually humbled by reality checks. The boxer with the biggest ego will readjust his attitude after losing some fights. It’s one thing to want to win the marathon, quite another to actually do it. Had National Socialist Germany and Imperial Japan been checked more decisively early on, things might not have come to a head in Europe and the Pacific. Even the most dangerous leader in the world isn’t so dangerous if restrained by bigger, greater powers. Erdogan and Netanyahu are about equally unhinged, but the former is less dangerous because his ambitions haven’t been indulged on the world stage.

Then, the problems of Jewish Supremacism can be attributed not only to Jewish nature and personality but to the failure of goyim, especially the Anglos(in the US, UK, Canada, Australia, and etc.) to act as a reality check, pushback, or bulwark. Constructive criticism never hurt anyone.
Granted, one could say that Jewish Power checkmated goyim into a position whereupon meaningful opposition became virtually impossible, i.e. whatever was expressed as criticism or counter-argument was construed as ‘Anti-Semitic’, evoking memories of the Nazis and the Holocaust, thereby forcing critics, however well-meaning and non-malicious, into a defensive position. Worse, as Jews came to control the key institutions and industries of the law, academia, media, finance, and arts/culture, any prospective critic of Jewish Power found himself surrounded and ‘checked’ on all sides. Thus, the Jewish checkmate on the goyim.

But the Western goyim, especially Anglos, could have prevented this when Jewish Power was far from all-powerful. The fact that they allowed this problem to fester to the point where Jewish Supremacist Power became absolute is a testament to their stupidity, cravenness, weakness, and lack of foresight.
If Anglos and Anglo-Americans, having lost the will-to-power to compete for dominance, resigned themselves to passing from history, then, at the very least, they should have groomed other groups to serve as counterbalances to Jewish Power. But, just when Jews took over the top positions from the WASPs, the example set by the latter was one of limp and lame servility to Jews(as the tragic and magical wise-men of history). If anything is worse than having bad rulers, it’s the worship of bad rulers.

There’s long been a debate about goodness as essentially an internal quality or an external factor. If someone is good, is it mainly because he’s good on the inside or conditioned to be good by outside forces? According to B.F. Skinner’s behaviorism, it makes little sense to speak of ‘personality’ or ‘moral nature’ because human behavior is believed to be the sum of all the external pressures that have conditioned it, much like a sculpture is the product of all the strokes by hammer and chisel. The so-called free will, according to this idea, is mostly an illusion. People do ‘good’ or ‘bad’ not so much as a matter of individual choice but as a matter of social conditioning. This isn’t to be confused with something like the Ludovico Treatment in A CLOCKWORK ORANGE where Alex is bio-chemically programmed against acting violently, wildly, or licentiously. Alex is incapacitated from doing what he really wants to do, whereas according to behaviorism, the myriad conditionings not only mold a person’s behavior but customizes him into believing he’s doing the ‘right’ thing(and refraining from ‘wrong’ things).

The reality is surely somewhere between internalism and externalism. It would be foolish to rely on external conditioning alone. The cultivation of moral character goes some way in the creation of decent members of society. It’s been said Japan is a Shame Culture that has relied more on its own brand of behaviorism. People are raised to be mindful of how others think of them and act in accordance with those expectations at the expense of one’s own individual sense of right-and-wrong, or personal conscience.
In contrast, it’s been said the Christian West, especially the Protestant North, has been a Guilt(or Sin) Culture where one’s primary sense of truth and decency is between oneself and God, or in the secular era, between oneself and a rational-fact-based knowledge of the world. (One could argue that Christianity, far from fostering genuine conscience, led to a hive-mind of puritanism, a kind of collective sanctimony of hysteria and moral panic, the secular-degenerate variation of which can be found in ‘wokeness’.)

Whatever may be true in the case of individuals, externalism is the better model on the macro-international scale, i.e. it’s foolish to rely on a country, especially a very powerful country, to be good and do good on the basis of its supposedly ‘internalized’ value system. For proof, we only need to consider the current West with its endless talk of ‘democracy’, ‘human rights’, ‘diversity-equity-inclusion’, ‘rules-based order’, ‘tolerance’, and etc., when its actual modus operandi is Jewish supremacist gangsterism aided and abetted by brown-nosing white cuck toadyism.

 Video Link

A society or nation, let alone an empire, is too big and complex for anything like an individual conscience. While a society made up of mostly nice people is likely to be pleasant, it’s no less true that even nice people can be swayed into believing the stupidest or craziest things. Nice is nice, but it’s a sentiment and attitude, hardly a guarantee for truth or meaning(which indeed may be deemed ‘un-nice’, like when a doctor has to tell the patient about a dire diagnosis). Most dogs are nice. Many cats are nice. Plenty of people are nice, which is nice, but it also means they’re docile, eager-to-please, and anxious-for-approval, thereby easy to manipulate by venal and devious types, for whom nice people are merely suckers-born-every-minute.

Usually, even in an order of nice people, the kind that rise to the top tend not to be so nice; they tend to be driven by greed, egotism, opportunism, power-lust, and etc. With their levers of control and manipulation, they can nudge-nudge the nice masses(with boy-scout souls) toward stupid or crazy things, much like how adults toy with the hearts and minds of children. How else does one explain so many NICE people going ape-shit over the Covid hysteria, not to mention BLM and Russia Collusion Hoax? 70% of Americans support ‘gay marriage’. They think they’re being so very nice. Lunacy via manipulation of niceness.

One would like to believe that a socio-political order full of nice people will reflect the general niceness at the top, but that hasn’t always been the case, not least because nice people tend to be suckers to the P.T. Barnums of the world.
As such, the only real hope for countries behaving well is through the mechanism of external pressures, e.g. the stronger country exerting pressure on a weaker country, weaker countries acting in concert against a stronger country, or a strong country counterbalancing a strong country. As for empires, they’re bound to fail at the level of decency because of the hubris intrinsic to imperialism. The US has amply demonstrated this following the end of the Cold War. It could have played the role of the Good Global Cop but became addicted to its power and prestige as the Lone Superpower.

The outcome of the political shift in the US might have been tolerable if the Jewish Ruling Elite that usurped the WASPs was represented by people of some wisdom, patience, and understanding. Failing that, if non-Jewish groups filled the counterbalancing role of constructive criticism.
Instead, with each passing year, Jews consolidated more control in the key institutions and industries, not only politically, economically, and culturally but spiritually, as Jewish Identity became most identified with the Holocaust(and the Cult of Anne Frank) and also with the images of Jews as funnymen, wise-men, and/or hapless victims, with the likes of Woody Allen often playing all three.

If Jews were mostly a passive, submissive, and/or resigned second-rate people, such sympathetic indulgences on the part of goyim would have been harmless. In truth, however, Jews have been among the most driven, capable, ruthless, devious, and/or neurotic people on the planet. Branding Jewishness with the victim-saint cult of Anne Frank, the adorable wise-man-cult Albert Einstein, and the endearing funnyman cult of Seinfeld simply missed the mark of the true nature of Jewishness and its victims.

Historically, Jews have been among the staunchest and most radical ideologues, often calling for violent means to effect change. Jews have been among the most spine-chilling executioners of communism. Jews have been among the most devious and parasitic of financiers, among the most corrupting influences on society and culture, among the cruelest in organized crime.
Jewish Supremacists engineered the events that led to the Ukraine War that may have consumed up to a million Christian Slavic lives, yet the ONLY Jewish concern is, “Is it good for the Jews?” Zionist Jews in Israel are now committing what some call a ‘genocide’ — if 1/10th of the violence done on Gaza was done on Israel, every Western member of the elite would call it ‘genocide’ for sure — , but the dominant discourse in political and legacy media circles boils down to “We must protect Anne Frank from another holocaust”.
The sacralized image of Jews and the actual nature of Jewish Power are so at odds that the contradiction has turned cancerous, utterly corrupting the West into defending Israel’s mass slaughter of civilians in Gaza as an act of ‘defense’, as if Jews are Forever-Anne-Franks no matter what they do whereas their victims are Forever-Nazis or Forever-Anti-Semites simply because they happen to be at loggerheads with the Jewish Agenda.

The other great contradiction in the current Western Mind involves the blacks who are narratively and idolatrously presented as wise, magical, kind, caring, noble, or so-cool-and-badass-that-their-transgressions-are-forgivable, but who, in reality, are the most criminal, thuggish, destructive, pathological, rude, and nasty creatures around. So, even though blacks have turned entire urban areas into mini-detroits and continue to fray the social fabric, they are usually regarded as saintly Emmett Tills or victims of ‘systemic racism’ — never mind the actual Emmett Till was a creep, though perhaps not as bad as Leo Frank.

We have psychopathic Jews using the US as the lone superpower to lay waste to entire parts of the world, and we have sociopathic blacks destroying entire communities across the US, but the great white majority in America is still stuck on the Anne-Frank and Emmett-Till narrative.
In the current West, we must pretend Benjamin Netanyahu is a wise and moral voice in the wilderness, a leader and a prophet, the ‘greatest man in the world'(according to Donald Trump), when he’s surrounded by ultra-right Zionist lunatics who aid and abet his maniacal wars. And we must pretend George Floyd is the greatest saint since Saint Paul, indeed even bigger than MLK, Mandela, and Michael Jackson combined.

Civilization isn’t just about wealth and material means. It’s about the vision of truth that guides it, and the current vision is about as decrepit as ever existed in history. Thus, no matter how rich and powerful the West may be, it will(and must) decline for its willful delirium that Jewish supremacist mass murderers are a bunch of Anne Franks and that black thug-savages are the salt of the earth, the kind of people at whose feet whites must grovel and mewl.

Anyway, with Jewish Power lacking wisdom & self-restraint and with most goyim, especially the white majority, sucking up to the Jews as the fount of all that is wise, holy, brilliant, and tragic, the continued degradation of the West seems a certainty. It makes you wonder about an order that puts the likes of Victoria Nuland, Anthony Blinken, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth in charge of foreign policy; an order in which the likes of utter human-garbage Mike Pompeo and John Hagee are emblematic of what represents ‘conservative’ values.

Whether it’s low IQ whites(Evangelicals) or higher IQ whites(libertarians and HBD), what unites them is a mental slavery to Zion as either the Chosen or the Champions. Evangelicals see Jews as the spiritual master race, whereas libertarian & HBD whites see Jews as the intellectual champion race, but the end result in political terms comes down to the same thing: It’s the duty of whites, as either Christian Zionists or IQ-cultist-Zionists, to cuck to the obviously superior tribesmen without whose guidance whites would have no direction and no future.

If sentimentality about the Jews, given what happened in World War II, may have been understandable prior to the apotheosis of Jewish ascendancy, it can only be diagnosed as a kind of retardation or craven opportunism nowadays, fueled mainly by fear and awe.
Likewise in ancient Roman times, partiality toward Christians went from voluntary sympathy for a victimized group to a mandatory adherence to a powerful group, indeed newly anointed as the most powerful. If, at one time, certain pagan Romans may have pitied the oppressed Christians, they later trembled in fear as all were mandated to pledge allegiance to the one and only faith.
Similarly, there is nothing personally or individually conscientious about white expressions of sympathy toward Jews in our time. No longer a matter of choice, one must grovel with compulsory sympathy(which isn’t real sympathy, a matter of personal choice) at the feet of Jews. When the likes of Mike Johnson, Mitt Romney, and Donald Trump do anal-licking on Zion, we know it’s out of fear and fright, but of course, no one wants to admit he’s a coward, so there’s the handy pretense that it’s all about caring for those poor poor Jews who may yet be Anne-Franked once again.

Now, why were the Jews uniquely poised to be the great peace-makers of the 21st century? One can come up with myriad reasons. The Jewish Diaspora is not only vast but intricately networked. So, while Greeks or Armenians in different parts of the world mostly focus on personal/local matters, Jews around the world have cultivated a global consciousness. So, a Jew in Germany, France, England, or Poland isn’t simply a Jew living in a country but a member of a larger worldwide community.
In addition, not only is the Jewish Diaspora vast and varied but Jews have gained elite status in most countries in which they reside, resulting in considerable institutional influence. Jews have also exhibited a dual nature that could be beneficial in international affairs, i.e. instead of a single-minded loyalty to one’s own nation, a larger sense of duty to mankind as a whole. (As things turned out, Jewish Power was less divided between nationalism[of the goy country in which Jews reside] and internationalism than between internationalism and Jewish supremacism.) Furthermore, Jewish intellectualism, especially the interest in history, politics, philosophy, and culture, lent the community an aptitude to excel in fields devoted to international relations that require depth and breadth of knowledge to understand and deal with peoples of different backgrounds, customs, and interests. And Jewish experience as haggling merchants and squabbling scholars well-prepared them for the arduous but rewarding profession of diplomacy and related fields. Diaspora + talent + knowledge + influence + sociability = Jewish advantage as interlocutors for the world community. Few groups were as well-equipped as the Jews to fulfill this role.

And when we consider men like Jeffrey Sachs and Chas Friedman, we can’t help but lament at the missed opportunity. Sachs and Friedman seem like decent individuals who, though loyal to the country of their birth/residence, wish well for all of humanity. Their vision is one of win-win for all nations. The United States need not see countries like Russia or China as adversaries or enemies. Differences can be ironed out or overcome. Or some kind of compromise is always preferable to demonization and escalation of tension. They may feel as patriotic Americans and even harbor a profound sense of Jewishness, but such feelings don’t negate acknowledging that Americans and Jews are part of a larger community of many countries and cultures.

If such Jews had commanded the heights of US foreign policy, perhaps the 21st Century would have been one of peace, in no small part made possible by the efforts of Jews.
Even Henry Kissinger, though understandably vilified in certain circles(especially on the Left), embodied a deeper and more complex idea of diplomacy, i.e. that while conflicts and confrontations are inevitable in history, there are common interests even among rivals, and those can be ferreted out to prevent the world from sliding into World War III. At the very least, respect your enemies as worthy foes. 21st Century diplomacy commanded by the likes of Kissinger might not have been ideal, but even that would have produced results preferable to what has been so far(and are likely to get worse).

Granted, Kissinger plied his talents when the US had a rival superpower(or at least a peer-power in military prowess, population, and resources) and when Jews played a supporting(than dominant) role in the power structure. Thus, there was less temptation for Kissinger(and other Jews of his generation) to prioritize Jewish Hegemony that had yet to materialize in years to come. (Given the CIA and LJB’s role in concealing/defending Israel’s nuclear program and the far-from-accidental USS Liberty attack, one could argue that Jews had already gained dominance in will-and-spirit even before achieving mastery of means. Even when Anglo-Americans or WASPs were at the top, they may have sensed somehow that Jews embodied an indomitable force that had to be either acquiesced or submitted to. Of course, there were even earlier signs, as when Harry Truman caved to the demands of the Zionists despite his personal loathing of them.)

In the final decade of the 20th century, several events and trends converged to make hegemony irresistible to a certain school of Jewish Thought. Boomers, in which Jews played an essential role in the various mini-revolutions(or ‘liberations’), took over the levers of power. The generational shift signaled an ethnic shift in the power balance, especially with the sudden collapse of WASP confidence, pride, and authority.
The Reagan Era deregulations gave green light to finance to run with ‘greed is good’, which meant a lot more money for Jews so prominent in the industry. It also meant the rise of monopolies and oligopolies, as with the concentration of all media in a few hands, most of them Jewish. (Jews had long dominated the media, but the domination got even more obnoxious beginning in the late 80s.)
The fall of the Soviet Union meant there was now only one superpower, the US that, under the presidency of boomer Bill Clinton, became a battleship of Jewish Boomer power.

The decade witnessed two falls and two rises. The fall of the WASPS(and the fading of the Greatest Generation) and the fall of the Soviet Union. The rise of Jewish Boomers and the US as the lone superpower.

Had Jews been wiser, they could have used the opportunity to take on the role of peacemakers around the world. And surely, there were some Jews, perhaps like Chas Freeman in his younger years, who regarded the moment(aka The End of History) as a golden opportunity to bring about greater peace around the world. After all, the USSR dissolved and the former Eastern Bloc nations went their own way. And China gave up Maoism in the Eighties and joined the global economy. Germany reunited without the alarmism of other European nations, and even Vietnam and Cuba were moving toward market economies. The US could have been the lone superpower minus the arrogance(that soon led to full-blown hubris) and could have represented the strength of immigrants drawn from all parts of the world.

Yet, just when so much was being made of ‘diversity is our strength’, the actual power in the US became ever more narrowly concentrated on ‘Jewishness is our master.’ Even as the goy elites grew more diverse by the year — blacks, browns, yellows, and etc. emerging in higher positions — , the ‘national’ theme became ever more focused on “Israel is our greatest ally” and “Israel is our closest ally” and Jewish This, Jewish That, and Jewish Whatever. All the ‘Arabists’ in foreign policy were summarily purged, and both political parties became ever more obeisant to the Neocons whose Democratic flipside were the Neolibs. And the slightest whiff of critical attitude toward Israel(and Zionist-adjacent policies) was grounds for dismissal, resulting in foreign policy teams(of both parties) that became ever more blindly, fanatically, and stupidly pro-Israel, pro-Neocon, and pro-Jewish-supremacist.

Perhaps, the test case for Jewish Power came when George H.W. Bush(and James Baker) pressed on Israel to stop building settlements in the Occupied Territories. Especially given the Gulf War, partly carried out to appease the Israel-Firsters, Bush possibly hoped that Jews would be more appreciative and understanding. He’d gone out of his way to crush Saddam Hussein, the much reviled enemy of Israel, and so, maybe the Jews would cut him some slack for putting some brakes on Israel.
Instead, Jewish Power(especially among the supposedly ‘liberal’ Democrats) pulled out all the stops to make sure Bush would lose in the 1992 election. A mild recession was made out to be another great depression. Now, it’s possible Bush would have lost anyway given the GOP fatigue, boomer-power emergence, L.A. riots aftermath, and host of other factors, but Jewish Power blatantly went out of its way to remove Bush and Baker for their stance on Israel. And indeed, it was the LAST TIME any President did anything substantial to check the Zionist agenda, though perhaps one could argue that Bill Clinton, the first boomer president, thought he was in good enough graces with the Jews to enact some kind of peace deal between the Jews and the Palestinians. (And then, sonny boy George W. Bush ended up being the biggest whore-dog of Zion ever, and it’s been a complete shit-show ever since, with Obama running as the man who opposed the Iraq War but then using the presidency to start even more Wars for Zion.)
With George H.W. Bush punished, demolished, and made-an-example for daring to apply pressure on Israel and with goy politicians getting the message that nothing must stand in the way of the Zionist agenda, Jewish Power became ever more emboldened that the world is their (g)oyster. The most illustrative face of this power was the hideous transformation of Victoria Nuland from a pleasant-looking operative to a monstrous hag willing to sacrifice any number of goy lives in service to Jewish Supremacism. What a crazy hagula.

Former Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland testifies during a hearing before the Senate Intelligence...

Consider a few examples of what could have been.

Following the collapse of communism in Russia, Jews there and in the US & around the world could have coordinated efforts to transform the Russian economy and politics towards something beneficial to everyone, but the main focus was to prop up a handful of Jewish oligarchs who looted the economy.
The face of political ‘reform’ under this Jewish influence was the boorish-drunk-and-ultimately-senile Boris Yeltsin who, in more ways than one, anticipated the Trump-Biden-Trump clown-show.
Given that Putin stabilized a country in tatters, went after only the worst of the Jewish oligarchs, built relations with Israel, banned ‘antisemitism’, and offered good-will cooperation with the global Jewish community, one would have thought Jews would have reciprocated.
But go to any library, and just about all the books on Putin(mostly written by Jews) are utterly rabid and virulent, downright deranged. Indeed, even books on Hitler, Stalin, and Mao aren’t so lopsided in their appraisals. In the end, what did it all lead to? The Judeo-Russian War in Ukraine in which over a million Slavs were sacrificed on the altar of Jewish Supremacism.

Now, take the case of China. More than any other group, Jewish globalist elites gained the trust of the Chinese government, and the relationship appeared to be symbiotic. Thus, Jews could have played the role of constructive mediator between the two giants, the US and China.
However, the ultimate goal of the Jews was regime-change, to promote ‘democratization’ to transform China into yet another anemic and hapless ‘Asian Pussy’ vassal like Japan, South Korea, and of course Taiwan. It seems the Chinese wised up to this, i.e. the so-called Liberal Democracy is really an Imperial Democracy with the Jewish-run West as the hegemon imposing its standards of what constitutes ‘democracy’ around the world, even if it means propping up the nasty and repressive regime of Zelensky in Ukraine as representative of ‘democratic values’.
According to the supposed rules of the Imperial Democracy, even democratic means are ‘autocratic’ or ‘far right'(or ‘far left’ for that matter) if the results run counter to the designs of Washington D.C.(and New York and London, both Jewish-ruled), whereas even repressive and tyrannical methods are ‘democratic’ and ‘rules-based’ if the results comport with the wishes of the hegemon. Recently, even the ISIS-Al- Qaeda head-chopper Jolani became the darling of the Western ‘rules-based’ political jet-set because he was instrumental in toppling the Assad government hated by Zion.

More likely than not, China figured this out, i.e. all this talk of ‘liberal democracy’ is so much BS emanating from Washington. Perhaps, there was a time when, naively or not, some figures in the West really did believe global democratization could turn the world into a better, freer, and more just place. Yet, the current Imperial Democratic model(that began to take shape in the aftermath of Francis Fukuyama’s declaration of The End of History) is focused on one thing only: The Sorosian strategy of promoting openness around the world to better facilitate the infiltration of institutions, indoctrination of minds, and recruitment of collaborators to erase national sovereignty in favor of satellite status to the one-world order as dominated by the Jewish-run West. Whether it was Russia in the 1990s or Ukraine in the 2010s(or Iran, Venezuela, Hong Kong, and etc.), it wasn’t about idealism or principles but about control and domination.

There was once a time when the West, especially the US, was accused of propping up dictatorships around the world(as puppets), but who would have thought that democratization would turn out to be an even more potent means of takeover, control, and domination? Japan as a democracy may enjoy certain individual freedoms(missing in China), but is the nation politically sovereign and culturally independent? Or must it do the bidding of its political master, the Jewish-ruled US, and comply with the cultural program of waving the GlogoHomo flag? If the current EU is what ‘democracy’ is all about, who wants it?
Instead of working toward peace and cooperation between the US and China(as a sovereign country), Jews now fan the flames of Yellow Peril(or Dragon Danger) because (1) they’re bitter that China stood by Russia in the Judeo-Russian War in Ukraine and because (2) directing Western ire at China distracts attention from the fact of Jewish parasitism in the West. And as white elites are too afraid and weak to address the problems of Jewish Power, they are more than happy to display the bogus valor by huffing-and-puffing at Fu Manchu.

And then, consider the Middle East. The recent sneak-attack on Iran was the most egregious manifestation of the Jewish Supremacist way. Pretending to negotiate for a compromise in good faith while planning for total regime change and takeover. What Israel attempted on Iran was merely the most violent and dramatic reiteration of what Global Jewry had been planning against Russia and China.
And the West itself hasn’t been immune as the cucked reality in the US and EU cannot be understood apart from the fact that Jews have effected something like ‘regime changes’ in nearly all the Western countries(while even the ones that have resisted, like Hungary, live in a state of fear and seek to placate the Jews by rolling out the red carpet to vile Zionists like Netanyahu).
Indeed, consider the stark differences between the EU on the eve of Bush’s invasion of Iraq and the EU today. Back then, European governments pushed back against the Neocon plan, but today, there’s hardly a voice among the governing elites of the EU that has the temerity to say NO to Neocons/Neolibs, aka global Jewish Supremacists. What happened to the European elites during that period?
As happened in the US, it seems global Jewish Power, by hook and by crook, installed a new clone-breed of ‘leaders’ like Emmanuel Macron who are incapable of ever saying NO to any Jewish Supremacist demand. When even the man who as harassed and tormented by the Jews the most, none other than Donald Trump, goes out of his way to appease Jewish Power at every turn, even trampling on every liberal and/or conservative principle at the heart of American Constitutionalism, the Jewish ‘regime change’ operation in the West seems complete.
Of course, given the total Jewish takeover of Western institutions and industries, there was no need for violent tactics as seen in the color revolution in Ukraine, the air campaign over Libya, the manufactured ‘civil war’ in Syria, and the sneak attack on Iran, though, to be sure, when push came to shove, Jewish Power hasn’t been averse to employing violent mobs of Antifa and BLM to wreak havoc across the US. Rather, the ‘regime change’ in the West has been relatively silent and beneath the surface, i.e. despite the regular cycles of elections and successions of politicians, the end result has been a revolving door of goy cuck puppets of Jewish Power. Nearly every politician is like a stepford-clone of Marco Rubio.

The Jewish failure is, in some ways, most tragic in the Middle East. Many Jews have long held a dual identity as whites/Westerners and Semites of Near Eastern origin. Thus, if Europeans in the Middle East and North Africa could only have been perceived as colonizers and imperialists, Jews could have played a dual role as people of the West and a people of the Middle East. Had Zionism been more humane and mutual-oriented, it could have worked out a deal with the Palestinians. Instead, Zionism opted for wholesale takeover of the land at the expense of its native population.
Even so, there was the possibility of the two-state solution and lasting peace, but even that was squandered as Israel insisted on holding onto whole swaths of the West Bank that was to remain under Jewish military occupation even if Palestinians were to have their own state.

Thus, instead of acting as a people of dual-heritage-and-identity, the Zionists decided to act like the European Imperialists of old. And instead of working for peace between the West and the Middle East, they took over the former and arm-twisted it into destroying the latter, the only choices for the Arabs/Muslims being collaborate-and-survive or resist-and-die. The choice is between Jordan, which collaborates and survives as a whore-puppet of Zion, or Syria, which resisted and has been utterly destroyed.
Jews, one of the few ancient peoples to survive into the modern age, could have come to an understanding with the Iranians/Persians, another people with deep and rich history. The fact that there’s a thriving Jewish community in Iran proves Jews and Persians need not be enemies. But Jews opted for total regional domination, even if it means endless wars and even genocide.

The people who could have been the greatest peace-makers became the biggest piece-makers, blowing up entire parts of the world into bits and pieces. In a way, all the traits that qualified Jews to be peacemakers also equipped them to be piece-makers, were they to go that way.
In the end, it was up to the Jews to decide as to how they should employ their unique abilities and advantages in world affairs. For the good of humanity, in which Jews would play a key role, or for the vanity of Jewish Supremacism. Somehow, the good Jews lost out to the bad ones. The vile Netanyahu, so murderous and mendacious, has become the face of Jewish Power.

But the blame must also go to the goyim who let this happen. How pathetic the goyim must be around the world to be so easily duped, so easily manipulated, and so readily culpable in the biggest crimes of the 21st century. And it’s not just cuck-maggots like Lindsey Graham in the West. Jews provoked a war in Ukraine that killed over a million Slavic lives, but Vladimir Putin and his cohorts have named just about everything — the Nazis, the Anglos, the Americans, NATO, the Europeans, and etc. — except the single most responsible party, the Jewish Supremacists. It’d be like Stalin fighting World War II without naming the Germans as the invaders. Goyim are pathetic.

Some people say the world is turning into an ‘idiocracy'(akin to Mike Judge’s movie), but most countries are ruled and run by men of smarts and experience. Most elite members of the US, EU, Asia, and Latin America attended good schools, earned credentials, and have experience. They are not idiotic or low-IQ like the morons in the comic movie.
What they’ve amply demonstrated is that high intelligence is no guarantee for integrity, i.e. intelligent people, though not idiotic, can be insipid, and insipidity is the state of much of the world, even including the elites in Iran — following Israel-America’s joint attack, the vapid and soulless president of Iran still wants to negotiate for a deal on the nuclear program. Goyim sure are pathetic.

 Video Link

Thursday, July 10, 2025

GloboHomo (Limp)Wristianity as Substitute for Christianity and Why Shallow Whites Obsessively 'Wristen' Everything

 The 'gay' agenda, from a local assertion of homosexual identity & interests to a global mission of absolution through Anno Sodomini.

The sorry sight of white people kneeling(or bending over) at the altar of GloboHomo is as remarkable as it is pathetic. Just how shallow of soul and weak of mind are they to be so easily manipulated into getting worked up over something so insipid, perverse, and ridiculous? Incredibly, degeneracy has been ‘spiritually’ placed atop the pedestal of themes that supposedly constitute the essence of Western Civilization. And, we’re not dealing with ignorant dummies but highly educated whites(and nonwhites with white-adjacent elitist vanities).
But then, what does it mean to be ‘educated’ these days when critical thinking, independence of mind, skepticism about authority, personal conscience, and free speech are suppressed in favor of idolatry, dogma, mantras, and official narratives?
Ideology can be oppressive, but at least it operates within a logical system, however restrictive it may be. In contrast, idolatry leaves no room for thought as it’s a mindless veneration and celebration of certain individuals(Stalin, Hitler, Mao, MLK, George Floyd), certain groups(Jews, blacks, and homos especially in the West), and cartoon narratives(superhero Churchill saved the West).
The rise of Safe Spaces and the doling out of milk & cookies to college students triggered by Donald Trump’s victory in 2016 were signs of the infantilization of American Mind, reaching its apotheosis with the Millennials, surely the most worthless and retarded generation in American History.
Jews, who’d once embodied the spirit of defiance and rebellion in their status war with the WASP establishment, came to favor hivemind obedience and brain-dead politics once they took charge. What was conceived of as ‘Critical Theory’ pioneered by Jewish intellectuals became vulgarized into a Jewish-led game of what & whom to condemn and what & whom to consecrate. Thus, Critical Theory wasn’t about cultivating a open critical mind on all questions confronting mankind but about the narrowing of criticality toward targets chosen by Jewish Power. If indeed Critical Theory were truly critical in outlook, there would have been ample criticism of Jewish Power, Black Thuggery, and Homosexual Degeneracy.
Instead, it was about harping endlessly about ‘antisemitism’, ‘racism’, or ‘homophobia’ against any candid discussion of certain topics while heaping endless critical abuse on targets chosen by Jews either out of genuine loathing(Russia, Iran, Hamas, and, of course, un-cucked whites like Thomas Massie) or for sake of distraction(China-China-China, or Yellow Peril card to distract the public from the real controllers of the West, the Jews).
It’s no wonder that Critical Theory soon evolved(or devolved) into Critical Race Theory. It wasn’t an exercise in free thought on racial matters but suppressing negative assessments of certain races or ethnic groups(especially blacks and Jews) while piling on the insults and blame on the white race, especially white males, especially real-sexual(or straight) white males, especially conservative real-sexual white males — if you’re a white male but homosexual, you’re somewhat blessed and if you’re a straight white male but ‘progressive’, you’re somewhat forgiven.
Not that the American Right has been much better. So-called HBD(Human Bio-Diversity) is also a kind of Critical Race Theory except that the likes of Jared Taylor heap abuse on blacks and Muslims but stay tight-lipped about the Jews, deemed so awesome that the white race’s only hope is apparently to win them over. As for Establishment Conservatism, it has proven itself to be just as foul and vicious as Critical Race Theory, with the likes of Tom Cotton, Mike Huckabee, Lindsey Graham, and countless others groveling at the feet of Zionists and cackling with hideous glee at the sight of starving Palestinian children and dead Palestinian mothers. In other words, the Right, far from being critical minded on all matters, has its own holy grails and blind-spots, its own politics of who/whom. HBD is less about biodiversity than Zio-diversity, the idea that Jews, being the top genius race, must be obeyed and served by the diversity of inferior goyim. Apparently, Zion deserves its license to operate above the morality of mediocre goyim whose only purpose in life is to compete for the position of the Favorite Pet of the Jews(as the rightful master race). So, we have garbage on the ‘left’, trash on the ‘right’.

In a way, white weakness and shallowness were evident in the 1,500 yr history of Western Christianity. Only a people devoid of spiritual depth and vision would have appropriated the mythic narratives and icons of another people and, furthermore, worship as (the Son of)God an ancient Jewish Man said to have been the Messiah, a Jewish concept. If whites possessed spiritual depth of their own, they wouldn’t have blindly adopted a foreign faith, even to the extent of waging total Culture War on their own heritage. Apparently, Europeans felt that their own culture was comparatively a pile of worthless shit and that they’d been living in darkness until they were offered the righteous path and promise of Salvation via the stories and sermons of the Jews and heretical Jews(who comprised the Early Christians).

When it came to material ingenuity, intellectual challenges, and creative output, Europeans became the equal of any civilization and then surpassed them all. But when it came to spiritual imagination, on matters of the holy and divine, they remained mental slaves of the Jews. Even as Christians at loggerheads with Jews and/or Judaism, whites were beholden to Jewish-conceived spirituality. And now, as post-Christians, they still rely on Jews for the Big Idea and Big Icon.
Today, there’s talk of ‘remigration’, or the need to physically send back nonwhite migrants and settlers in the West, but no less urgent perhaps is the need for the Remigration of the Mind, i.e. white minds must expel the colonizing elements of Jewish Influence. Because Christianity developed as much as an opposition to Judaism as a continuation of it — Jesus Christ as Messiah is the fulfillment of Old Testament Prophecy — , whites could always fool themselves that they were not spiritual-mental slaves of Jews. But despite Christianity’s deviation from core Judaism, the fact remains that its justification owes to Jewish Prophecy and its originators were all Jews. Besides, the modes of seeing and believing expressed in the New Testament are part of Jewish cosmology.

Now, it may well have been that Jewish spirituality was more profound and deeper than anything cooked up by the ancient Greeks, the Romans, and the barbarian Germanic folks. It has often been the case that one culture delved deeper, strove further, and reached higher. Jewish spirituality itself didn’t appear out of nowhere but was the product of Jews absorbing pagan influences all around them. But Jews took all those elements and forged a vision of their own.
So, the idea of whites drawing influence from Jewish spirituality was never the problem. But instead of emulation, there was imitation, something disdained by Johnny Cash in the liner notes of Bob Dylan’s NASHVILLE SKYLINE. Dylan himself wouldn’t have amounted to much without the influences drawn from various goy musical talents, but he molded those influences into something uniquely his own.

But white dummies or whummies adopted whole hog the Old Testament narrative, as if the ancestors of the Jews were their own ancestors, at least in the spiritual-emotional sense. For example, E. Michael Jones knows that his ancestors were white Europeans but dismisses their history as the wasted years of a bunch-of-half-naked-barbarians-hunting-pigs and looks to the ancient Jewish texts for moral/spiritual compass.
Even though the New Testament is central to Christianity, nearly the entirety of its narrative dwells on the final year of Jesus and, as such, is easily exhaustible as a source of inspiration and storytelling. Besides, the most exciting stuff is in Genesis and Exodus, with Charlton Heston as Moses doing battle with Yul Brynner as Ramses II. Or God blowing up proto-GloboHomo Sodom and Gomorrah like the fire-breathing flying turtle Gamera with space alien monsters. That’s where all the fun stuff is.
It’s no wonder that so many Christians are really Old Testament Christians. Despite the conviction that the New Testament redefined the Covenant and condemned the Jews, the likes of Mike Huckabee and his mentally challenged flock love to role-play as modern-day Israelites on the journey to the Promised Land. In this, we can understand why something like Mormonism took hold in the US. Though deemed a heretical sect of Christianity, the bulk of Mormonism is about re-imagining the stories in the Old Testament in a New World setting. (As if pretending that the ancestors of the Europeans were folks in the Bible wasn’t enough, the Mormons extended this myth even to the New World tribes.)

In this, the Abrahamic religion has been far more damaging to world cultures than, say, something like Confucianism. Even though Confucianism wasn’t exported globally, it did have a profound impact on peoples and cultures adjacent to China: Vietnam, Korea, Japan, etc. But even though Confucius was Chinese, Confucianism-as-export wasn’t to make the non-Chinese revere the Chinese but to advise them to revere their own ancestors. For example, a Vietnamese, Korean, or Japanese under Confucian influence believes it is his duty to venerate his own ancestors, not to pretend that the Chinese are their ancestors.
In other words, Chinese should remember their own ancestors, and non-Chinese should revere their own ancestors. Confucius’s idea was not that non-Chinese should ignore their own past in deference to all things Chinese but for them to be like the Chinese in revering their own past. So, Confucianism provided the method but not the content. A Japanese Confucian’s duty is to pay honor to his Japanese ancestors instead of making ritual offerings to long dead Chinese. Besides, Confucius was acknowledged as a teacher, not an object of worship.

In contrast, Christianity says the Jewish Jesus must be worshiped as God. Given His holiness, the story of the Jews in the Old Testament isn’t merely tribal but prophetic, a prolonged anticipation for the coming of the Messiah. Thus, the Jewish story, aglow with divine destiny ordained by God, was thought to shine brighter than any other.
The result has been for countless generations of whites to pretend as if the ancestors of the Jews were their own ancestors. The effect has been the same outside the West. A Japanese or Korean who adopted Confucianism venerated his own non-Chinese ancestors. In contrast, a Japanese or Korean who is Christian becomes fixated on the ancestry of the Ancient Hebrews and no longer cares about his own ancestors; he’s even likely to reject honoring his own Asian ancestors as ‘idol-worship’, much in the way that E. Michael Jones disdains his own ancestors as ‘pig-hunting barbarians’ before Catholicism came along and turned them into insufferably sanctimonious child-molesting priests.

Defenders of Christianity regard the religion as an evolutionary(or even revolutionary) moral improvement on Judaism, a spiritual contradiction in worshiping the one true universal God who, however, favors Jews above the rest of humanity. Judaism doesn’t concede that every people have their own gods and that the Jewish God, one among many, happens to favor the Jewish people; rather, it says all the gods of the goyim are false idols and only the God of the Jews is the true God. However, this true God, far from being the wise and loving lord over all mankind, has made a special Covenant with the Jews who are His Chosen. Thereby, some(or many) Jews concluded that goyim exist to serve the Jews as the Chosen Master Race. The emergence of Christianity exposed a moral contradiction within that cosmology, i.e. if the true God that the Jews worship is wise, loving, righteous, and just, why would He favor one group of humans to lord over the rest as lesser-humans?

Of course, in the time around the birth of Christianity, there was another contradiction: If indeed Jews were the Chosen of the one true God, why were they a hapless bunch at the mercy of the pagan Romans who then seemed destined to inherit and rule the Earth? Thus, Christianity grew as a response and resistance to both Jewish authority and Roman power.
At least from the viewpoint of what would later grow into a powerful Christian community, Jesus Christ solved the contradiction within Judaism. As the Messiah, He supposedly rewrote the Covenant so that ALL of mankind could be the beloved of God via conversion and devotion.
Thus, the Abrahamic cosmology went from tribal to universal. Instead of Judaism being regarded as the preeminent Abrahamic religion premised on the eternal Covenant between God and the Jews, it was seen by Christians as a vessel leading to the Final Destination as revealed by Jesus the Messiah who, far from arriving to save, defend, and empower the Jews against the goyim, came to bless the goyim, all of the mankind, with the promise of salvation. Instead of for-the-Jews-against-goyim, it was for-the-goyim-against-the-Jews. Even the much loathed Romans could be redeemed and saved as the children of the one true God through faith in Jesus Christ. In a way, it signaled the triumph of the Jewish Will over the Pagan Will(even if the Tribal Jews were left out in the cold in the Christian Order). “Romans conquered us in body, but we conquered them in spirit.”

It’s one way to interpret Christianity, a movement from the tribal to the universal. But another way is to see it as tribal-to-super-individual, tribal-to-egomaniacal, or ethnomaniacal-to-egomaniacal. Judaism says that the Jews are the Chosen, and all of humanity may be blessed only through the Jews(as a collective). No single Jew can claim spiritual lordship over all goyim. Rather, Jews as a tribe have that spiritual honor and privilege as laid out in the Jewish sacred texts.
Now, one may wonder what Jews meant by humanity being blessed through the Jews as spiritual middlemen, and surely Jews disagreed among themselves. It certainly wasn’t about equality with goyim but, in its kinder aspects, it could be construed as something like the “White Man’s Burden” as conceived by Rudyard Kipling, i.e. the nonwhites(and ‘lesser’ whites perhaps) mired in backwardness must be uplifted by the superior civilization of the whites.
But despite the positive spin, empire meant that the British would arrogantly and derisively lord over their subjects. While some Jews surely regarded goyim as filthy animals or barely human beasts, other Jews tempered their sense of superiority with a spiritual duty to mankind. The Old Testament vacillates between regarding goyim as enemies to smite and rival tribes worthy of recognition and respect, at least on the basis that if the goyim are nice to the Jews, God will bless them. “If you let me pick your pocket, my God will substitute your loss with twice the amount in gold.” There’s a sucker born every minute. At any rate, the more good-willed Jews were surely the progenitors of what would eventually become Christianity.

In the sense that Christianity welcomes all, it’s truly universal. But in the sense that it emphasizes a single Jew, Yeshua or Jesus, as the ONLY gatekeeper to Salvation, it’s even more ‘petty’ or ‘narrow-minded’ than what is tribal or ethno-maniacal: It is downright egomaniacal. Instead of ALL Jews of the Tribe laying claim to lordship over the goyim, Christianity is about ONE Jew saying that it’s all His. It’s almost like proto-Ayn-Rand stuff.

If Christianity said there is the one True God and ALL of humanity could gain His blessing, that would be one thing. Instead, it says all of humanity must go through the singular superstar Jew, Jesus Christ, to be saved.
In other words, while Christianity is, in many ways, more generous than Judaism in its universalism, it is also more selfish in saying that only one Jew, Jesus Christ, has the right of bestowing blessing on the goyim.

It’s likely one reason why the Jews have hated Christianity(and Jesus) with such virulence and sense of outrage: The nerve of the guy!! These Jews were being brotherly and mutually respectful, at least within the Tribe, that they would all share in the power to bestow blessings upon the goyim(under certain conditions, of course), but then this one Jew came along and said, “me, me, me”. Imagine if a brotherhood of ten agreed to rule the world together on an equal basis, but then one brother steps forth and declares himself the sole ruler.
Judaism was quasi-spiritual-socialist in positing that all Jews shared in the right of lordship over goyim(and in the dispensation of blessings), but Jesus went all Ayn-Rand-individualist in saying He(as the supreme individualist) is what matters for the salvation of mankind. He hogged the right of lordship over goyim. Thus, even as Christianity greatly expanded the number of applicants, it radically reduced the admission board to ONE, Jesus.

Then, the Jewish contempt for Jesus is likely twofold. On the one hand, Jesus was the sappy do-goody sucker who foolishly shared the Jewish Treasure with unworthy lowlife goyim. On the other hand, Jesus was the greediest Jew who hogged the Covenant for Himself, reformulating it to found a new religion whereby all of humanity would prostrate itself before Him(and him alone and not any other Jew) in order to be saved. After all, Christianity doesn’t say, “God loves you and you can be saved through His love.” Instead, it says, “God can love you but ONLY IF you worship the superstar Jew Jesus as your savior, or else it’s Hell.”

Christianity is a kind of minion-universalism. It doesn’t say all humans have individual worth and equal dignity as sentient and sentimental beings independent of dogma. Rather, it says all of humanity may be deemed worthy of salvation but ONLY THROUGH the figure of Jesus the Super-Jew or else they’re damned eternally. And even within Christianity, some Churches in imitation of Jesus, like Catholicism, say salvation is possible only through their brand of the faith.
If Jesus Christ and Bibi Netanyahu have one thing in common, it’s the idea that the-world-revolves-around-me-me-me. So, if the Middle East is engulfed in more wars that may spiral out of control and lead to World War III, that’s okay as long as it keeps Netanyahu in power. Likewise, despite the story of Jesus sacrificing himself for all mankind(that, however, never asked him to make the sacrifice on its behalf), Christianity insists that all of humanity is forever indebted to Jesus and only through Him can they be redeemed and saved. Clearly, Jesus and Netanyahu are very different individuals, but there’s the shared idea that all of humanity and history must submit to “My Will”.

Video Link

Both Judaism and Christianity are projections onto the universe of a particular set of Jewish temperaments, be they cultural proclivities or genetic traits. It is a kind of megalomaniacal totalization of everything with the Jewish mind-body-soul at the center, or Judeo-Centrism on steroids. Instead of subjectivity conceding to the impartial objective — “no matter how or what I or my own people feel, there is a reality out there that is independent of my wishes, emotions, or thoughts” — , it seeks to impose one’s subjective will as the utmost objective truth. As Karl Marx remarked, “The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it.”

It’s one reason why the more logical and/or empirical Ancient Greeks and Modern Anglos lost out to the Jews. Their way was to contain the subjective, personal or cultural, to better study and understand the objective, i.e. Ontology over phenomenology. In contrast, Jews with their forceful personality, whether religious or secular/‘scientific-materialist’, have insisted on imposing their subjectivity as the ultimate objectivity.
In this, despite all his talk of ‘materialism’ and ‘science’, Karl Marx had more in common with the Jewish Prophets of old. And even though Ayn Rand called her philosophy ‘objectivism’, it was really about her subjective insistence on how logic should work. Her subjective view of objectivity was the only true objectivity.
Now, when people who restrain their subjective personalities confront people who inflate their own, the latter gains the advantage of egoism, or the will to power. It’s like, if there are two homos and one homo keeps his penis flaccid while the other homo makes his penis erect, the latter will likely bugger the former. Notice how the more inhibited Anglos wilt in the presence of ‘pushy’ Jews.
Granted, the mere force of will isn’t sufficient to win the day, and the true Jewish advantage has been the verbal skills to spin their subjective biases into objective-seeming ‘truths’. Just like Jesus’s supreme egotist megalomania was sold as universalism, Karl Marx’s personal vision of history and justice was spun as ‘scientific’ and ‘materialist’. Countless goyim(with weaker wills and feebler minds) were persuaded. Neocons are still at this game. Their core ideology is really Jewish supremacist tribal-imperialism(or totally ethno-subjective), but they use think-tanks with names like ‘American’, ‘National’, ‘Democratic’, ‘Rules-Based’, ‘Progressive’, and etc. to fool goyim into believing that their agendas are objectively for the good of all humanity.

As long as the Western soul remains quintessentially Christian in some form or other, it doesn’t matter if one regards the Faith as anti-Jewish or even ‘Anti-Semitic’, i.e. useful as a spiritual shield against Jewish ethnic or religious hostility. All said and done, it means that the white race worships a Jew and is at the mercy of his cosmic whim, or else burn in Hell.
It implies that whites in their own right cannot be visionaries or prophets worthy of directly communing with the Great Mystery. It means ONLY Jews are so entitled, relegating whites to total reliance on Jews(of the Old Testament and the New Testament) to serve as intermediaries between the Great Mystery and Mankind. Thus, even as ‘Christ Is King’ may annoy Jews to no end, it ultimately means, “We whites worship the superstar Jew Jesus, without whom we are nothing, no better than a booger up a rat’s nose.”

Even in the post-Christian world, most of what the current West is, the Christian legacy sustains the mental habit of perceiving Jews as the highest authority with the final word on just about anything. It’s no wonder that even post-Christians and anti-Christians, be they atheists or agnostics, continue to look to Jews for the answers. For example, Holocaustianity, with Anne Frank as the new madonna and six million Jews as mini-christs, is perhaps the biggest mass cult in Europe.

As to what remains of Christianity, it’s better understood as Neo-Christianity, rather similar to how Conservatism gave way to Neo-Conservatism. Both Neo-Conservatism and Neo-Christianity are the reprogramming of what were essentially goy-dominated credos or movements into Jewish-centric ones. Over time, Neoconservatism revealed itself to be Israel-First, Ultra-Zionist, and Jewish Supremacist, as well as White Cuckist, White Dog-ist, and White Submissivist. Notice how the members of the GOP(as the ‘conservative’ party) fall all over each other to be the first one to suck Netanyahu’s cock.
Neo-Christians are the spiritual equivalents of the Neocons. They reject, atone for, and seek redemption for Christianity’s long history of ‘antisemitism’ and ‘blaming Jews as Christ-killers’. Instead of upholding Christianity as a corrective to and advancement on Judaism(as plagued with flaws, compromises, corruptions, and ultimate sin of Deicide), they regard their religion as an inferior little brother to Judaism as the higher faith.
Thus, Neo-Christianity isn’t about the spiritual rejection of and liberation from Judaic failings and betrayals but about the commitment to enthrone the Jews to their rightful role as the Chosen Masters of the World. Figures like Kristi Noem the puppy-killing wench and Mike Huckabee the cuckabee are essentially Neo-Christians.
‘Progressive’ Jews complain that the Evangelicals support Zionism only to bring about the return of Jesus accompanied by Waffen-SS troops assigned to summarily execute all Jews refusing to convert to Christ-worship, but that is no longer the case. Neo-Christians worship Jews more than Jesus. They believe Jesus, upon returning, will first visit Netanyahu and kiss his feet. Neo-Christians prefer the Old Testament to the New Testament, which is why they wet their pants at Zionists invoking the ‘Amalek’ in the slaughter of Palestinian women and children.

Neo-Christians come in several flavors. While the ‘conservative’ Neo-Christians, usually Evangelical types, generally focus on Judeo-Centric Israel-worship, the ‘liberal’ Neo-Christians of the ‘Mainline’ denominations don’t necessarily have a hard-on for Jewish Power. Some of them may even air grievances against Zionism and express sympathy for, if not solidarity with, Palestinians.
However, they are indirectly subordinate to Jewish Power because, wittingly or not, their main ideological themes and iconic symbols are the products of the academia-and-media complex controlled by Jews. As these types are no less influenced by Hollywood(as the cultural vatican of the world) and colleges disseminating the latest fashions in moral panic and neo-missionary fervor, they invariably become mind-bots of Jewish Influence.
Indeed, despite pockets of pro-Palestinian sentiments in the ‘Mainline’ sphere, the predominant themes are centered on Jewish-funded Globo-Homo and Negrolatry, which is designed to milk ‘white guilt’, thereby rendering whites pliable to agendas of the Other, especially the Jews of course.

For a couple of years, St. George Floyd Worship was the hot-button topic in ‘Mainline’ circles, but if there’s been a consistent running theme in nearly all of them, it’s been Anno Sodomini, Globo-Homo, Queertianity, Assboy Veneration, and Bunghole Apotheosis.
Walk by just about any ‘Mainline’ church, and you’re likely to see it draped with symbols of ‘gay pride’, nowadays just called ‘pride’. Apparently, vain and narcissistic homos not only nabbed the term ‘gay’ for themselves but ‘pride’ as well. What’s next? ‘Good’ and ‘Noble’, followed by ‘Sacred’ and ‘Holy’, all claimed to be synonymous with ‘homosexual’? In our age when a man can claim to be a ‘woman’, I suppose it’s no crazier to associate homo-fecal-penetration with ‘pride’. “I’m so proud that some guy ejaculated up my anus, and then I sucked his dick.”

Unlike the troubled alliance of Jews and blacks with vastly divergent talents — Jewish brains and black brawn — , the partnership between Jews and homos is far more complementary and constructive. Both groups tend to share interests in the same or interrelated fields of arts & letters, academia & media, politics & power, lawfare & organized crime, and gossip & information-gathering. Both are obsessed with status and prestige.
As minorities, they’ve mastered the art of nudging and manipulating larger groups via passive/aggressive ploys of damning praise, veiled threats, and blackmail. Jews play the dominant role in this partnership, with homos as the happy ‘bitch’ who love the thrust and feel of Jewish Power up their arses. Homos love to be where the power is, and they are grateful to the Jews for having elevated homos to quasi-sacred status. And homos make ideal global agents because every part of the world has its share of fruiters and tooters who are more than willing to work with Jewish Power that showers them with prizes and elevates them to the status of angel-aristocrats seated next to the Jewish throne.

Indeed, apart from the worship of Zion, what is the biggest unifying theme among all the elites of the West and the satellite countries? It’s not German-ness, Britishness, Frenchness, Japanese-ness, Italian-ness, Swedishness, Korean-ness, Mexican-ness, Norwegian-ness, Finnishness, and etc. It’s not even abstract principles like democracy, human rights, sovereignty, and justice. What unites them is the shared adoration of Holy Homo.
From the Jewish perspective, the veneration of homos as an elite-minority nicely complements and comports with the submission to the Jews as the minority-ruling-elite. This is why Jews have been so insistent on forcing male tranny athletes into women’s sports. It’s really about enforcing the view that minority privilege, especially if endorsed by Jews, must take precedence over majority concerns. Homos over the straight majority, Jews over the goy majority, trannies over the female majority.

If not for Jewish Power, homos in the liberal democratic order would have carved out a nice niche for themselves. They’d be free to be homosexual, indulge in their homo-ish acts, and have rights as individuals regardless of their deviant proclivities. But, their ways would not be celebrated, their symbols would not be officialized, their narcissism would not be forced on normal society, and their degeneracy would not be encouraged among school children. It’s the Jews who turned ‘gay rights’ into Gay Rites, the building blocks of which would be used to construct a substitute for Christianity as the defining spiritual mythos of the West. It’s like the robot ‘Maria’ in METROPOLIS(by Thea von Harbou & Fritz Lang) that is created to replace the real Maria, the spiritual leader of the working class. We’re living in ShlomoHomoNegropolis.

Video Link

The ‘gay’ issue in the West went from a liberal-secular tolerance of deviant lifestyles to a virtually official and compulsory veneration and worship. Though initially attached to secular politics, it has since become a means of transforming the West into a quasi-theocracy.
What distinguishes a theocracy from a liberal-secular state? Theocracy posits that certain truths aren’t only immutable but sacrosanct, therefore it should be taboo to question, ridicule, or mock certain ‘protected'(which is euphemism for ‘officially-promoted’) groups and their preferences and convictions.
In a theocracy, mocking Moses, Jesus, or Muhammad could get you punished or exiled, even killed. In a secular liberal order, you have the right of free speech, individual conscience, and critical mindset to question any orthodoxy, and as such, the Power shouldn’t determine what is ‘unacceptable’ as a credo or statement, even if it means you prefer Satan over God. And indeed, one can badmouth God or Jesus in the West and not be punished.
However, as the history of Marxism demonstrated, even secular and ‘scientific’ ideas can become dogmatic and enforce consensus on entire populations. Marxism wasn’t regarded as one among several economic theories but the only true one, akin to holy scripture.

In the current post-liberal neo-theocratic order, Jews control the gods, and it’s virtually deemed taboo to be ‘racist’, ‘anti-semitic’, or ‘homophobe’. Once upon a time, being ‘racism’ meant shouting ‘nigger’ for no reason, ‘antisemitism’ meant hating Jews for no reason, and ‘homophobia’ meant hounding & assaulting homosexuals minding their own business. Now, ‘racism’ is noticing that blacks commit the bulk of crimes due to their genetic nature, ‘antisemitism’ means noticing the supremacist nature of Jewish Power & Zionism, and ‘homophobia’ means pointing out that the quasi-sexual acts of homos are abnormal, gross, and unhealthy.

In other words, the post-liberal order goes far beyond the call for tolerance and empathy for all groups, majority and minority, normal and deviant, mainstream and dissident. Rather, it expressly favors three particular groups — Jews, blacks, and homos — for adulation, veneration, and idolization. BLM has been neo-theocratic, as when everyone was compelled to accept the narrative of saint George Floyd. People who refused to toe the line were harassed, persecuted, fired, and blacklisted, the Current Year equivalent of being burned at the stake for heresy. The 10/7 Narrative is also neo-theocratic. We are expected to ignore all of Israel’s crimes and acts of terror prior to that event(Gaza Uprising) and mindlessly accept that peace-loving Jews dancing in Eden were attacked by subhuman Palestinians(or ‘Hamas’) that just loves to kill Jews for no reason(especially by beheading forty babies).
Instead of weighing the grievances of both sides, most powerful institutions and figures in the West(especially in the US) frame the event and crisis only in terms of pure-as-snow Jews defending themselves from another holocaust by Arab-Nazis… even though, in its aftermath, Jews have been committing horrors comparable to those done by the Nazis.

And Jews would have us believe that GloboHomo is the New Normal. In other words, the great majority of real-sexual or straight people must pretend that homo-fecal-penetration and tranny-genital-mutilation are just as healthy and positive as real-normal-sexuality, the kind that produces life; and, they should confirm and encourage the delusions of homos and trannies with endless panoplies of ‘gay rainbow’ colors and month-long festivities.
And if Evangelical Neo-Christians worship Israel as the land of the Chosen, the ‘progressive’ types revere Israel as the ‘gayest country in the world’, or Bunghole Mecca.

GloboHomo festivities are presented as blissful and jubilant, but it comes with a dark side. As with the rallies in North Korea, the participants are compelled to show enthusiasm. If you crave status and want to ‘belong’, you better join in the fanfare, or else you come under suspicion as a heretic or renegade. It’s been said that powerful people once took care not to be associated with homos or homosexuality in public, but it’s become virtually compulsory for all politicians and prominent people to show support at ‘gay pride’ parades in big cities.
Even hoi polloi can be fired from their jobs if they express disgust about what homosexuals do. And it has spread like wildfire in the West and its satellites. In the UK and much of Europe, you can be arrested and fined for expressing anti-homo sentiments. Jared Taylor once remarked that a Japanese politician privately expressed disgust for homosexuality, but when it got out, he was forced to apologize profusely and step down.
These are all signs that the West is a neo-theocracy as certain matters are held to be so sacrosanct that anyone who crosses the official line must be purged, shamed, and cast out. Like the Jewish-dominated New York Times opined, the debate on “Gay Marriage”(aka “same-sex marriage”) is OVER and that’s that. In other words, Jews decide what is what, and you better comply or else you will be destroyed and cast into darkness.
There was a beauty pageant where a contestant, Carrie Prejean, was asked if she supported ‘gay marriage’, and she thought she still lived in a free country and had a choice. Her answer was no, and the smile of the questioner instantly turned into a spiteful grimace, and then the entire media complex hounded her and dragged her reputation through the coals. She was treated like a witch who carried out demonic rituals. For Jewish Power, she was a heretic to be destroyed.

A sure sign that GloboHomo was intended(by Jewish Power) as a substitute for Christianity is its uncanny mimicry of the outward semblance of Christianity. While pagan-Dionysian aspects of GloboHomo are plain to see, the Agenda has quasi-sacramental aspirations as well, implying that ‘gayness’ is not only next to godliness but synonymous with divinity itself. No doubt countless homos have entered the Catholic Church to subvert and transform it from the inside, which explains why Catholic colleges are often festooned with globo-homo symbols and displays.
As for ‘Mainline’ denominations, their primary certification of ‘spiritual’ purity is devotion to ‘rainbow’ Sodom. Even as they profess to welcome all groups and all people, the ONE GROUP they emphasize for special attention is the LGBTQXYZ community.
The de facto message is that most groups are simply generic and interchangeable in the eyes of the church, but HOMOS are special and deserving of their place atop the pedestal as the chosen of heaven. The message is that all groups must venerate homos, prioritize them over all others, even their own.
It’d be one thing if these denominations said that Christianity is open to everyone, even sinners(including homosexuals), and all are capable of redemption. Instead, the ‘Mainline’ message is that homosexuality is, far from being sinful, one of the greatest of all virtues, the blessed of god. It’s like Tim Cook of Apple invoked god when discussing his ‘sexuality’. Somehow, spending one’s entire life getting rammed in the arse by other men is a blessing from above.

One of the features of religions, especially universalist ones, is the idea of the one true path for ALL. For Muslims, Muhammad is the final and greatest Prophet, and his message is the true message for all mankind. For Christians, there is no Salvation outside the Church and without Jesus. Judaism isn’t universalist in the conversionary sense(like Christianity and Islam) but could be construed as semi-universalist in believing that there is One and True God for all the world and humanity, except that He favors Jews over all other groups, and therefore other peoples can be blessed only by being good to the Jews as the Chosen.
According to Buddhism, the one true path is through the attainment of Nirvana. And even non-universalist religions(or cults or superstitions) have a way of making people feel paranoid about not having done the proper thing to gain blessings, favors, or reprieves from the supernatural or cosmic forces.

If there’s only one true way, then everything must be blessed or purified through it or else remain cursed, vulnerable, or unprotected(like Achilles’ heel that wasn’t dipped into the river Styx). In time, even things that ostensibly have little or nothing to do with spirituality may be sanctified in its name. Jews concocted kosher laws that came to affect so many facets of their lives, from diet to dress to all manner of daily habits. Christianity did away with most of Jewish customs, but it had its own sets of rituals, depending on the church, sect, or denomination of course.
Therefore, even though Jesus offered no theory on architecture, a new building would be ‘christened’ in His name. Artistic expressions of pagan origin, especially Greco-Roman, were ‘christianized’ to infuse Biblical tales and stories with beauty and color. Pagan temples were ‘christianized’ into Christian ones(and later some were Islamized when Muslims conquered Christian areas, like in Constantinople/Istanbul). Even things that had zero origin in or relation to Christianity were blessed or consecrated in the name of Jesus with the implication that nothing in the world could have worth unless somehow filtered and reprocessed through Christianity, the only religion with the supposed Midas touch of holiness.

Such practices became so commonplace that eventually the term ‘to christen’ took on a generic meaning, a ceremonial dedication for any occasion, like smashing a champagne bottle on a newly built ship, devoid of any spiritual content. Still, it was an extension or secularization of the Christian idea that, because there’s only one true path to Salvation, everything had to be processed through the Church or ‘touched’ by Jesus/Jehovah. Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus, or ‘Outside the Church [there is] no salvation’ or ‘No salvation outside the Church’. Just like ‘all roads lead to Rome’ and all Muslims gather at Mecca, all things must be within the approving purview of the Church. No wonder the Christian symbol became so ubiquitous, displayed not only in churches and religious centers but everywhere and further materialized through images/icons, banners, jewelry, and trinkets.

And when Christians contemplated the big wide world, it was full of heathens whose souls had to be brought into the light. Christianity wasn’t only about embracing its members but reaching out and touching out all of humanity with the miracle of Jesus. It didn’t matter their race, ethnicity, or religion. Whether they were white, black, brown, yellow, or red, they could only be saved through Jesus. Whether they were Jewish, Muslim, pagan, or whatever, they could secure true Salvation only through faith in Jesus.
Thus, Christianity obsessed about how all of humanity could be brought to Jesus. Even peoples who knew nothing of Christianity or worshiped other religions were eyed as benighted souls to be eventually conquered, converted, and thus saved. So, even when Christians didn’t force Jews to convert, they prayed for the conversion of the Jews.

In some cases, Christians sought to stamp out the heathen or pagan cultures of the peoples they conquered and/or converted. In other cases, however, the pagan practices were allowed to remain but were nevertheless christened and consecrated, thus incorporated into Christo-cosmology. Consider how many of the pagan rituals of Europe were ‘syncretized’ and transformed into Christian observances, not least with the emergence of the Christmas holiday. Thus, even non-Christian things were made ‘Christian’, blessed and holy.
Pagan elements faced two options with the spread of Christianity: Erasure or elevation(via christening). In the Renaissance, so much of the Classical pagan expressions were revived to idealize and mythologize the themes in the Bible, the very thing that had done so much to destroy the pagan heritage. But pagan expressions could be rehabilitated via christening or Christianization.

The Jewish-concocted GloboHomo (mass)cult has taken a page out of the Christian playbook. For Jews, ‘gay rights’ thing was meant to become Gay Rites, the substitute for Christianity(and possibly Islam as well) and replacement for classic leftism(of Marxism and the like), or from class politics to ass politics, from May Day to Gay Day.
Even though the ‘gay rights’ movement began as a localized and limited affair — the demand for homos to have the freedom and right to be different in lifestyle and orientation — , it was increasingly promoted as something of fascination(and then great fascination) to the real-sexual straight community as well.
Initially, it was a way to remind straight people to be sensitive about homo feelings, e.g. not calling them ‘faggots’ or shouting ‘God Hates Fags’. But increasingly, the the straight or real-sexual community was pressured to accept homosexuality as something okay, acceptable, decent, admirable, wonderful, normal, moral, and then even spiritual.
The movement began with homos demanding to live in their own spaces with their own desires/wishes. Then, we were to believe that homo-fecal-penetration was just as natural and normal as real sex. Then, the idea was that what homos do qualifies for the blessings of marriage. And even though homosexuality cannot create life(and never produced a single life in all of history), homos should be ‘parents’ too by taking life created through real-sexuality, i.e. homos should be free to reject real-sexuality but then demand its fruits.

Jews and homosexuals have a shared antipathy toward Christianity. For Jews, it’s the faith that accused the Chosen Tribe of Deicide, or Jews as Christ-Killers; the faith also said that the Messiah, for so long prophesied by the greatest seers among the Jews, arrived only to favor the goyim(who would accept Him) over the Jews, a total reversal of expectation and hope.
As for homosexuals, Christianity was forever the value system that condemned and purged the sodomites, in a manner far more draconian than when the West had been under pagan rule. Under Christianity, homosexuality wasn’t merely a deviance or even perversion but a sin of the worst kind.
Not that secularism or neo-paganism necessarily offered safe haven for homos. Freudianism held homosexuality to be pathology linked to childhood sexual abuse/trauma, therefore a mental sickness. And we know how the communists and National Socialists regarded homosexuality.
Still, the longest running show and the most deeply entrenched spiritual system in the West was Christianity, historically and resolutely anti-Jewish and anti-homosexual.
Then, it’s understandable why Jews and homos made common cause to subvert Christianity. Granted, the anti-sodomite position of Christianity has roots in Judaic Laws that condemn homosexual acts as deserving of capital punishment. But in the late modern era, the secular Jews gained the greatest power, and their sense of Jewishness was ethno-centrist-supremacist than moral-spiritual, and this made the Jewish-Homo, or Jomo, alliance possible.

The redefinition of ‘gay’ to mean ‘homosexuality’ should have been a warning sign. The homos took a word that had various meanings but made it almost exclusively synonymous with homosexuality.
Then, the idea of ‘gay pride’ was bad enough as what was there to be proud about? Some guy like Milo taking multiple dongs up his bung? Someone like Andrew Sullivan sucking dicks? Eventually, homos claimed the term ‘pride’ itself to be synonymous with homosexuality. Nowadays, if anyone hears ‘pride’, it usually means ‘gay’. Imagine a group making ‘brave’ or ‘noble’ synonymous with their identity.

None of this would have been possible without the power of the Jews with their control of money, institutions, and industries. It was the Jewish-run media that saturated the discourse whereby ‘pride’ came to connote the wonders of homosexuality. And then, homosexuality was associated with rainbow colors. Thus, one of the wonders of nature became associated with bung-donging and lesbian muff-eating.

Of course, this was a clever Jewish trick. If homosexuality had been sold straight for what it really is, people would have associated it with sexual deviants doing homo-fecal penetration and spreading filth and disease all over. In other words, most people would have been turned off by it.
But instead, homosexuality was promoted in association with non-homo things with positive or favorable attributes, like the rainbow for instance. Who doesn’t like the rainbow? The term ‘gay’ was useful in distracting people from what exactly homosexuals do, which is practice a pseudo form of ‘sexuality’ whereby a sexual organ penetrates the fecal organ of the anus.
And ‘LGBTQ’ was useful like ‘KFC'(Kentucky Fried Chicken) when fried food got a bad rap in public consciousness. Just go with ‘F’ than ‘fried’ — hipper that way. The use of such an acronym made homosexuality sound like a form of sci-fi futurism.
And in TV shows, homos were often featured as ‘more normal than normal’: cleaner, nicer, healthier, gentler, happier, better-adjusted, in other words like the Mormons. Just like Mormons sought to compensate for the retardation of their cult-heresy by trying to be more-normal-than-normal, homos(and their enablers) have also created this image of homos as mostly a professional class of well-educated types, the people-next-door, the new Ozzies and Harriets, except that they’re Ozzies and Harrys who prefer bumholes over beavers.

Over time, homosexuality went from the biological to the ideological, then to the spiritual. At the strictly biological level, homos are simply those who were born homo, and they count for maybe two to three percent of the population. At the biological level, we can accept that some people are born homo and wanna do their homo things, like take penises up the anuses. It’d be their business, not ours.
But at the ideological level, homosexuality became part of the academic/intellectual/cultural discourse on gender identity and politics. Even though gender ideology generally doesn’t say non-homos can become homo, it does promote ‘gender’ confusion whereby real-sexuals, especially if affected from a young impressionable age, wonder if they are really one of the many ‘wondrous’ unicorn-like ‘gender-fluid’ identities yet to be discovered.
Thus, even if not homo, they become homo-adjacent in their rejection of the solid foundations of real-sexuality.

Furthermore, because so much of ‘intellectual’ discourse is centered on gender(and LGBTQXYZ), young people come to associate philosophical sophistication with ‘queerness’. Thus, even real-sexuals come to believe that higher consciousness and deeper meanings are inaccessible without the fawning discourses on homosexuality and its gender-adjacent deviancies.
In time, nothing seems lamer, more square(and reactionary), and more contemptible than ‘hetero-normativity’ and ‘cis-male’ identity. Consider that normal and natural things have been renamed to sound freaky or sickly. Not ‘male’ but ‘cis-male’, for example.
And as trannies would have it, women are not women but ‘biological women’, as if there’s any other kind. Of course, trannies would have us believe they are more-woman-than-woman whereas women are simply and lamely biologically women. Trannies are ‘women’ based on sophisticated concepts, ‘more evolved’ ideology, and creative wish-fulfilment, whereas women are simply and lamely born as women, yawn.
In a perverse way, trannies have something in common with Christians who are wanna-be Jews, or New Jews: Whereas the ‘boring’ Jews are merely born Jewish, the ‘exciting’ Christians pursue the fantasy of being the New Chosen by trying to out-Jew the Jew, and that somehow makes Christians nobler as they go out of their way to dream of Heaven(whereas Jews take for granted that they’re the Chosen of God).

Jews, the main pushers of the ‘gay’ agenda, cleverly turned the HIV fiasco in favor of homosexuality. Even though the disease resulted from the obscene, filthy, and gross behavior of too male homos, homos were presented as saintly victims who were being impugned merely for ‘loving’ other people — you see, taking it up the arse from hundreds of men in the washrooms of ‘gay bars’ is ‘love’, or ‘love is love’, and the fault is with those who see that as gross.
Just like phony ‘liberals’ call for compassion for the Palestinians in Gaza without ever mentioning that the horror has been perpetrated by murderous Zionists, the Jewish-run ‘gay’ agenda made a big deal of the tragic suffering of the homos while hardly mentioning how and why the disease spread like wildfire in the homo community.
In Jonathan Demme’s bogus PHILADELPHIA, the Tom Hanks character is said to have caught the disease from a single chance encounter when, in fact, most homos who got the disease had indulged in homo-fecal-penetrative acts with innumerable men.
Post-religious libby-dib wiberals needed something to feel holy-shmoly about, and the Jewish spin on homos-as-tragic-suffering-saints-dying-for-the-sin-of-‘love’ became the new gospel and was soon adopted by the ruling elites.
As for cuck-conservatives, their status vanity and servility to Jews(as the richest and most powerful people), as well as their awareness that homos had penetrated into the deepest corridors of elite institutions, meant that they no longer had the will to fight the good fight against the spread of this cultural plague.

Jewish Power was such that it used the very problem caused by homos to elevate them to holy status. It was as if homos stricken with HIV were mini-christs who died for ‘love’ to absolve us of the sins of ‘homophobia’. The bogus term of ‘homophobia’ initially implied that those who are grossed out by homosexuality are clinically or mentally unwell, i.e. you see, it’s ‘irrational’ to believe that penis doesn’t belong up the poop-chute.
But in time, the term took on ‘spiritual’ implications well. It wasn’t just a mental malady but a SIN against the holy homo. Not surprisingly, one of the poster-boys of the Agenda was Matthew Shepherd, an irresistible name to the Agenda. Ah, the new gospel of Matthew, the saintly shepherd of men.
Even though he was killed in a drug deal gone bad by other homos, the Jewish-run media spun the incident as a case of wicked small-town redneck ‘homophobes’ who crucified him on a fence. The real-sexual normal society was blamed and called on to atone.
But then, these are the same Jews who, via BLM, created the BS about an epidemic of innocent black males being mowed down by white ‘racists’ when, in fact, most blacks are killed by other blacks(who don’t give a shit about the ‘niggaz’). With Jewish Power, everything gets inverted. For example, Israel attacks Iran, but all we hear is “Israel has a right to defend itself.” Even though Israel has nukes aimed at Iran, “Iran must give up its nuclear program.”

At any rate, the homo thing didn’t merely go from the biological to the ideological but entered the realm of the spiritual, especially as homos began to take over the Mainline churches and festooned them with homo colors. And the Catholic church has a large pool of crypto-homos waiting to leap out of the closet and claim the Vatican as the New Sodom.
GloboHomo mimics Christianity in proselytizing to the entire world. But, it’s also like Judaism in that there’s a clear hierarchy between the homos and the non-homos. Globo-Shlomo and Globo-Homo run side-by-side in our world, especially in the West, in that all are welcome but the non-shlomos(the goyim) and non-homos(the straights and gender-confused) must defer to the shlomos(the Jews) and homos(as the Pride Tribe) as holier and more blessed.
Christian Zionism, for example, is about Christians united with Jews in a cause where Jews are the masters and the Christians are the servants, pleading for trickle-down-blessings from the Chosen. And with Queertianity, the straights or real-sexuals praise, cheer on, and celebrate homos(and trannies) as especially precious and wonderful(or superior to straights). Notice ‘woke’ or ‘progressive’ parents don’t feel pride in their normal kids; no, they make a big holy stink ONLY IF their kid comes out as ‘gender fluid’ and insists on a frankenstein-surgery of ‘gender affirmative’ care. Would that be ‘gender affirmative action’?

Wherever Jews spread GloboHomo, the idea is that the great majority of real-sexuals should venerate the homos as the rightful minority-elites, and all homo minority-elites around the world are to be interconnected via global Jewish Power. Thus, even if real-sexuals cannot biologically or socially become homosexual or ‘gay’, they can become quasi-spiritual adherents to the cult of homo-holiness. It’s similar to the idea that mortal humans cannot be like the immortal gods, but they can worship the gods and receive favors or blessings.

If Christians had the habit of christening things, GloboHomo has its counterpart, what might be called ‘wristening’, that is if we were to label Globo-Homo as Limpwristianity, or simply Wristianity, a global mass-cult intended by Jews to replace Christianity. Given homo narcissism, of course homos(and trannies) love all this attention. If Christianity says all of humanity can be blessed ONLY THROUGH Jesus Christ(and/or the official church in His name), Wristianity says all the world can be blessed ONLY THROUGH the tinkerbell-magic of the homos(as the closest allies of the Jews).

Thus, instead of “Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus”(or “outside the Church there is nothing”), we have “Extra anum homosexualis nulla celebration est”(or outside the homo’s anus, there is no celebration”). It’s as if the wonders of the world are null and void without the ‘sanctity’ of homosexuality. Thus, far from homosexuality being contained in a localized sphere as a deviant sexual category, its ‘aura’ and ‘radiance’ must light up the world and work its magic on all things.
It’s no wonder we see ‘gay pride’ symbols even in association to things that have NOTHING to do with homosexuality. I passed by an animal hospital one day with a ‘gay flag’. Now, what does treating injured cats and administering rabies shots to dogs have to do with Andrew Sullivan’s bunghole being pummeled by black dongs? What does veterinary medicine have to do with homos having an orgy in a bathhouse in San Francisco? Absolutely nothing, but nowadays, ‘gay’ is more than ‘homo’. It is a homily for all seasons and reasons, grace for all faces and places.
So, one may visit a garden and see a homo symbol. Visit a military site and see a homo symbol. Visit a museum(of whatever) and see homo symbols. Pass by a cafe with a homo flag. What does ordering a coffee have to do with Milo getting rammed in the arse by Negroes? I don’t know, but that’s of course not the point. Everything has to be ‘wristened’ because the Holy Homo is the prevailing ‘spiritual’ theme of the current West under Jewish Power. The once ubiquity of the Christian cross and other religious symbols have been replaced with GloboHomo or Wristian symbols.

Of course, Jews did their best to rid public spaces of Christian symbols on grounds of the separation of church and state, but the spread of Wristianity is really a form of neo- or quasi-theocracy. The Agenda is no longer about the need to acknowledge that some people are born homo and should be tolerated as such. It is now the near-mandatory idea that homosexuality is good, noble, wonderful, and inspiring, or the celebration of ‘reaming’ is redeeming.
It has all the trappings of a theocracy because those who reject, oppose, or mock GloboHomo Wristianity are routinely ‘canceled’, fired, and blacklisted. It’s no longer a matter of rational discourse, individual choice, or critical investigation; there is only one ‘truth’, and it demands that you bow down to Wristianity.
Given the spiritual, cultural, and moral hollowing of the West(as the Empire of Lies), it’s depressing but unsurprising that so many people, especially vapid whites, took this Jewish bait and entered the love-is-love tunnel of the homo’s anus, which is now the white vision of heaven filled with ‘rainbows’, the final destination of the ‘pursuit of happiness’ as laid out by the Founding Fathers in our age of the Fondling Sons.

That’s why we see homo-this and homo-that everywhere. Some people(and I mean straight people) dress up their dogs and other pets in homo colors. ‘Woke’ parents make their kids wear ‘gay rainbow’ t-shirts. Children’s spaces in libraries and schools have been infected with tranny propaganda, greeted as angelic and magical by idiot parents and ‘educators’. “Those who can, do; those who can’t, teach worship of sodomy.” The ‘gay rainbow’ has become the crusading battle flag of the West. Wherever it is prominently displayed, it means Jewish Power has conquered, colonized, and ‘converted’ the hearts-and-minds of the fools and cowards there.

And then, there is food. So many foods have been ‘wristened’ with GloboHomo stuff. Apparently, it wasn’t enough to make all foods kosher-friendly in a country where the vast majority of people aren’t Jews. In the Current Year, foods must be ‘wristened’ or ‘homoshered’. Even though burgers, cookies, and candies have NOTHING to do with Bill bung-donging Bob, many store and restaurants feature ads where certain food items are presented in globohomo colors. Oreo cookies became Homoreo cookies. Why would anyone want to be reminded of sodomy while eating anything? “Hey, this donut tastes better because it’s associated with what ‘gay’ guys do.” “Wow, this drink is awesome because it’s associated with some guy sucking another guy’s penis.”

The current West makes such a big fuss about ‘diversity’ and ‘inclusion’, but some identities/groups are more-equal-than-others. We know this about Jews and blacks. It also goes for homos, which is kind of weird.
After all, Jewishness and blackness, as with all groups and identities, have both positives and negatives. In contrast, there is NOTHING GOOD about homosexuality. What is good about homo-fecal-penetration, aka sodomy or bung-donging? Now, some may argue that homos have contributed significantly to arts & letters, and that’s true enough, but the act of homosexuality is objectively and naturally gross. It’s better to celebrate the arts and creativity while acknowledging the significant role played by homo sensibility and skills.

The US claims to be proud of comprising just about every racial, ethnic, national, cultural, and/or religious background, but most of them go ignored while so much is made of homosexuality, for which there is an entire month devoted to it. And in many parts of the West, Globo-Homo is like a year-long cult of devotion. Many crosswalks in urban centers have ‘gay rainbow’ colors, thereby compelling EVERYONE to follow the homo-brick-road as if we’re all off to see the Wizard of Poz. Talk about ‘intersectionality’. All roads must converge on the Homo Square.
Thus, homosexuality isn’t merely one of the many identities that make up Western Society but The Crucial and Essential Identity to which all other identities must bow down to. It’s like the entire world has to be sprinkled with the golden shower of some freaking homo.

Indeed, the ‘gay agenda’ no longer treats LGBTQXYZ obsessions as part of a subculture and instead promotes them as transit links to the GloboHomo Central Station through which all of humanity is to gather, receive communion(or cum-union), and be confirmed as ‘citizens of the world’ at the end of Francis Fukuyama’s End of History. It’s no longer about homos(and trannies) doing their own thing but serving as the quasi-spiritual conductors for all of humanity.
Thus, it’s not enough that you’re white, black, Irish, Hindu, Muslim, Russian, Hungarian, Turkish, Kenyan, Chinese, or whatever. No, your worth isn’t complete or fulfilled unless you’ve been sprinkled with ‘rainbow’ colors by homos as the magic fairies of the world.

At one time, the homo flag only represented the homo community and its peccadillos. Due to their innate narcissism, homos couldn’t resist reveling in their perversity as a matter of ‘pride’.
And then, homo narcissism soon gave way to homo megalomania, i.e. it went from “We homos are so proud” to “Humanity is cursed without our blessings.’ Humanity must partake of Anno Sodomini. Apparently, it’s easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for anyone to enter the halls of status, prestige, wealth, and influence without the stamp of approval from GloboHomo.

In other words, homos aren’t merely beneficiaries of ‘diversity’ and ‘inclusion’ but the very emblems and gatekeepers of those ‘virtues’. For all the talk of ‘inclusion’, ‘diversity’, and ‘equity’, you don’t have to know much or anything about Mexicans, Colombians, Cubans, Japanese, Vietnamese, Burmese, Saudis, Iranians, Yemenites, Turks, Azeris, Russians, Hungarians, and etc. but you better damn well know about homos, how wonderful and magical they are, and why there must be month-long celebrations of their ‘pride’ in all the globalist centers of the world. Indeed, you can even forsake and forget about your own ethnic identity, culture, history, and heritage entirely as the current Cult of Diversity has no curiosity or concern for the ethnicities and cultures around the world(except when it comes to food and drink).
So, if a Burmese or Kurd in the West forgets all about his people, culture, and history, that’s no disqualification for joining the club of power and privilege. But, he must accept the GloboHomo sacrament(along with Jew-Worship and Negrolatry).

All peoples must be subsumed into the GloboHomo church and faith. Whatever their differences in race, language, ethnicity, nationality, history, ideology, and whatever, they must share in and partake of the magic of Homo-Mania.
At a minimum, they must have in common the veneration of homo-fecal-penetration draped in ‘rainbow’ colors.
The formula is similar to that of Christianity, whereby you may keep your own ethnicity, language, history, and culture, BUT all must share in the faith of Jesus Christ as the Messiah and Son of God. Thus, your identity is secondary to what really matters, your devotion to Jesus. It doesn’t really matter if you keep your Mexican identity or lose it, BUT you must prioritize your utmost devotion to Jesus.

Likewise, by making GloboHomo the intersectional depot for the global hubbub, the message is loud and clear: All your identities are secondary to the worship of the godly ‘gay’, and all identities exist only to seek benediction by entering the ‘rainbow’-colored anal canal of sodomic lust.
And so, homosexuality went from one identity among many to the crucial Imperial Identity to which all other identities must pledge fealty for absolution. It has become like the godfather of identities. Sodom has become the mecca of globalism.

Whatever independent worth an identity may have, it remains suspect and unfulfilled UNLESS it acknowledges its place as a sliver of color on the GloboHomo ‘Rainbow’ Flag that centralizes Homosexuality as the highest identity(after Jews, but then Limpwristianity is a Jewish concoction, a neo-satanic parody of Christianity, which, for all its problems, was the product of higher moral and spiritual yearnings of Jews for whom Judaism was no longer enough).
Notice all we hear from Western politicians is endless paeans to Jews and Israel, endless hosannas for all-things-homo, and endless platitudes about Negro Magic, which explains why the Western World is erecting random statues of fat black women simply on grounds that blackness makes them special(and apparently better, along with Jews and homos, over the rest of mankind).

Ever notice homosexual symbols have become ubiquitous at just about any event, even those that have NOTHING to do with homosexuality? In 2020, BLM symbols were accompanied by ‘gay’ ones in marches. Whatever is being celebrated or protested, it’s as if the theme or cause would be incomplete or deficient in some way without the blessings of ‘rainbow’ angels. Just about every institution or event has to be ‘wristened’ to obtain the stamp of approval by the homos as the new priestly caste.
It could be about racial issues, labor conflict, feminism, immigration, ‘social justice’, or even conservatism(like Turning Point USA with its official mascot of the tranny ‘Lady Maga’). All must be limpwristened with ‘gay’ symbols to show that they are ‘kosher’ in the eyes of globalism.
So, even if side A and side B are opposed on some issue, they are likely to share in the adoration of the holy homo(and fealty to Zion, of course). Democrats and Republicans, both are now for ‘gay marriage’. ‘Liberals’ or ‘Conservatives’, both are agreed that “Israel has a right to defend itself”(even when it is the genocidal aggressor in the Middle East). Whatever the various identity/interest groups may be divided on, they better be united on devotion to Jews and Homos.

And so, that’s where we are at. (Limp)Wristianity, Anno Sodomini, or GloboHomo has become the neo-religion of the decadent and degenerate West, in which real culture has been hollowed out by pop culture, celebrity, idolatry, and shallow ideological fashions and in which Jewish Power made sure that only the worst kind of people moved up the ladder of status, success, and influence. Utterly unserious but taken so seriously by the ‘most educated’ in a system where neo-theocratic indoctrination has replaced critical thought and recognition of reality.